Search (32 results, page 1 of 2)

0.0849553 = product of:
  0.1699106 = sum of:
    0.1699106 = sum of:
      0.13570267 = weight(_text_:literacy in 2603) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.13570267 = score(doc=2603,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.29616246 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.8650045 = idf(docFreq=340, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05049654 = queryNorm
          0.4582035 = fieldWeight in 2603, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            5.8650045 = idf(docFreq=340, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2603)
      0.03420792 = weight(_text_:22 in 2603) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03420792 = score(doc=2603,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17683028 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05049654 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2603, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2603)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Purpose - This paper aims to report the result of follow-up research on end-users' conceptions of information visibility on the web and their conceptualizations of success and failure in web searching. Design/methodology/approach - The data were collected by a questionnaire followed by a brief interview with the participants. The questionnaire was developed based on the information visibility model suggested by the author in the original study. Fifty-two library and information sciences students from Tarbiat Mollem University (TMU) and Iran University of Medical Sciences (IUMS) in Tehran took part in the study. Findings - The model of information visibility can enable web users to gain a better understanding of their information seeking (IS) outcomes and it can assist them to improve their information literacy skills. The model can provide a theoretical framework to investigate web users' IS behavior and can be used as a diagnostic tool to explore the contextual and conceptual elements affecting the visibility of information for end-users. Research limitations/implications - The paper suggests a visibility learning diary (VLD), which might be useful to measure the efficiency of information literacy training courses. Originality/value - The contextual and conceptual approach of the paper provides a deeper insight into the issue of information visibility, which has received little attention by IS and information retrieval researchers until now.

Date

1. 1.2009 10:22:40

0.033925667 = product of:
  0.067851335 = sum of:
    0.067851335 = product of:
      0.13570267 = sum of:
        0.13570267 = weight(_text_:literacy in 5047) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13570267 = score(doc=5047,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.29616246 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.8650045 = idf(docFreq=340, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05049654 = queryNorm
            0.4582035 = fieldWeight in 5047, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.8650045 = idf(docFreq=340, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5047)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

We investigated the searching behaviors of twenty-four children in grades 6, 7, and 8 (ages 11-13) in finding information on three types of search tasks in Google. Children conducted 72 search sessions and issued 150 queries. Children's phrase- and question-like queries combined were much more prevalent than keyword queries (70% vs. 30%, respectively). Fifty two percent of the queries were reformulations (33 sessions). We classified children's query reformulation types into five classes based on the taxonomy by Liu et al. (2010). We found that most query reformulations were by Substitution and Specialization, and that children hardly repeated queries. We categorized children's queries by task facets and examined the way they expressed these facets in their query formulations and reformulations. Oldest children tended to target the general topic of search tasks in their queries most frequently, whereas younger children expressed one of the two facets more often. We assessed children's achieved task outcomes using the search task outcomes measure we developed. Children were mostly more successful on the fact-finding and fully self-generated task and partially successful on the research-oriented task. Query type, reformulation type, achieved task outcomes, and expressing task facets varied by task type and grade level. There was no significant effect of query length in words or of the number of queries issued on search task outcomes. The study findings have implications for human intervention, digital literacy, search task literacy, as well as for system intervention to support children's query formulation and reformulation during interaction with Google.

0.033584695 = product of:
  0.06716939 = sum of:
    0.06716939 = product of:
      0.13433878 = sum of:
        0.13433878 = weight(_text_:literacy in 891) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13433878 = score(doc=891,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.29616246 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.8650045 = idf(docFreq=340, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05049654 = queryNorm
            0.4535983 = fieldWeight in 891, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.8650045 = idf(docFreq=340, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=891)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

The study investigated how users' emotion control and search tasks interact and influence the Web search behavior and performance among experienced Web users. Sixty-seven undergraduate students with substantial Web experience participated in the study. Effects of emotion control and tasks were found significant on the search behavior but not on the search performance. The interaction effect between emotion control and tasks on the search behavior was also significant: effects of users' emotion control on the search behavior varied depending on search tasks. Profile analyses of search behaviors identified and contrasted the most commonly occurring profiles of search activities in different search tasks. Suggestions were made to improve information literacy programs, and implications for future research were discussed.

0.028786883 = product of:
  0.057573766 = sum of:
    0.057573766 = product of:
      0.11514753 = sum of:
        0.11514753 = weight(_text_:literacy in 2383) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11514753 = score(doc=2383,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.29616246 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.8650045 = idf(docFreq=340, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05049654 = queryNorm
            0.38879853 = fieldWeight in 2383, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.8650045 = idf(docFreq=340, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2383)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

This paper desctibes a study of undergraduate student search behavlour, examines the results through the lens of various disciplines, and provides now insights that will increase our understanding and facilitate the development of mom effetive instructional programmes Perspectives and research results drawn from multiple disciplines are used to explore the role of mental modele, reference groups and habits, and IntelIectual development in the search behaviour demonstrated by the undergraduate students. During interviews conducted as part of the study, many students were able to articulate the importance of source evaluation and describe electronically-appropriate methods for assessing the authority and reliability of Weh based information resources. In practice, however, these students frequently abandoned source evaluation altogether and, following the path of Ieast resistance, relied exclusively on basic Google searching, This approach both compromiscd the quality of their search results and contributed to frustration with the research process. This may not be extraordinarily unusual behaviour, but it is cause for considerable concern among Information literacy programme planners and Instructors. Discussion of the study results and related research is followed by pragmatic suggestions for modifylng ineffective search behaviour through emhanced instructional programmes

0.028786883 = product of:
  0.057573766 = sum of:
    0.057573766 = product of:
      0.11514753 = sum of:
        0.11514753 = weight(_text_:literacy in 536) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11514753 = score(doc=536,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.29616246 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.8650045 = idf(docFreq=340, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05049654 = queryNorm
            0.38879853 = fieldWeight in 536, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.8650045 = idf(docFreq=340, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=536)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

In this article, we present an in-home observation and in-context research study investigating how 38 adolescents aged 14-17 search on the Internet. We present the search trends adolescents display and develop a framework of search roles that these trends help define. We compare these trends and roles to similar trends and roles found in prior work with children ages 7, 9, and 11. We use these comparisons to make recommendations to adult stakeholders such as researchers, designers, and information literacy educators about the best ways to design search tools for children and adolescents, as well as how to use the framework of searching roles to find better methods of educating youth searchers. Major findings include the seven roles of adolescent searchers, and evidence that adolescents are social in their computer use, have a greater knowledge of sources than younger children, and that adolescents are less frustrated by searching tasks than younger children.

0.027366336 = product of:
  0.054732673 = sum of:
    0.054732673 = product of:
      0.109465346 = sum of:
        0.109465346 = weight(_text_:22 in 1448) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.109465346 = score(doc=1448,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17683028 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05049654 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 1448, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1448)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

22. 5.2005 19:53:09

0.023989068 = product of:
  0.047978137 = sum of:
    0.047978137 = product of:
      0.09595627 = sum of:
        0.09595627 = weight(_text_:literacy in 3783) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09595627 = score(doc=3783,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.29616246 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.8650045 = idf(docFreq=340, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05049654 = queryNorm
            0.32399878 = fieldWeight in 3783, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.8650045 = idf(docFreq=340, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3783)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Searching for health information is one of the most popular activities on the web. In this domain, users often misspell or lack knowledge of the proper medical terms to use in queries. To overcome these difficulties and attempt to retrieve higher-quality content, we developed a query suggestion system that provides alternative queries combining the Portuguese or English language with lay or medico-scientific terminology. Here we evaluate this system's impact on the medical accuracy of the knowledge acquired during the search. Evaluation shows that simply providing these suggestions contributes to reduce the quantity of incorrect content. This indicates that even when suggestions are not clicked, they are useful either for subsequent queries' formulation or for interpreting search results. Clicking on suggestions, regardless of type, leads to answers with more correct content. An analysis by type of suggestion and user characteristics showed that the benefits of certain languages and terminologies are more perceptible in users with certain levels of English proficiency and health literacy. This suggests a personalization of this suggestion system toward these characteristics. Overall, the effect of language is more preponderant than the effect of terminology. Clicks on English suggestions are clearly preferable to clicks on Portuguese ones.

0.023945544 = product of:
  0.047891088 = sum of:
    0.047891088 = product of:
      0.095782176 = sum of:
        0.095782176 = weight(_text_:22 in 3339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.095782176 = score(doc=3339,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17683028 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05049654 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3339, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3339)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

22. 5.2005 19:52:29

0.023945544 = product of:
  0.047891088 = sum of:
    0.047891088 = product of:
      0.095782176 = sum of:
        0.095782176 = weight(_text_:22 in 3924) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.095782176 = score(doc=3924,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17683028 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05049654 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3924, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3924)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Library and information science research. 22(2000) no.4, S.371-382

0.01710396 = product of:
  0.03420792 = sum of:
    0.03420792 = product of:
      0.06841584 = sum of:
        0.06841584 = weight(_text_:22 in 5835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06841584 = score(doc=5835,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17683028 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05049654 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5835, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5835)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

5. 8.2006 13:22:44

0.013570267 = product of:
  0.027140534 = sum of:
    0.027140534 = product of:
      0.054281067 = sum of:
        0.054281067 = weight(_text_:literacy in 312) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.054281067 = score(doc=312,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.29616246 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.8650045 = idf(docFreq=340, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05049654 = queryNorm
            0.18328139 = fieldWeight in 312, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.8650045 = idf(docFreq=340, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=312)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

The book's central thesis is that information literacy, information architecture, and usability are all critical components of this new world order. Hand in hand with that is the contention that only by planning and designing the best possible software, devices, and Internet, will we be able to maintain this connectivity in the future. Morville's book is highlighted with full color illustrations and rich examples that bring his prose to life. Ambient Findability doesn't preach or pretend to know all the answers. Instead, it presents research, stories, and examples in support of its novel ideas. Are w truly at a critical point in our evolution where the quality of our digital networks will dictate how we behave as a species? Is findability indeed the primary key to a successful global marketplace in the 21st century and beyond. Peter Morville takes you on a thought-provoking tour of these memes and more -- ideas that will not only fascinate but will stir your creativity in practical ways that you can apply to your work immediately.

Footnote

Rez. in: nfd - Information Wissenschaft und Praxis 57(2006) H.3, S.177-178 (D. Lewandowski): "Wohl unbestritten ist, dass die Suche in Informationsbeständen eine immer größere Bedeutung erhält. Wir suchen nicht nur noch explizit, indem wir ein Informationssystem anwählen und dort eine Suche absetzen, sondern verwenden Suchfunktionen innerhalb von Programmen, auf Websites, innerhalb des Betriebssystems unseres Computers oder sogar ziemlich unbewusst, indem wir Informationen maßgeschneidert aufgrund einer einmal hinterlegten Suche oder eines automatisch erstellten Suchprofils erhalten. Man kann also in der Tat davon sprechen, dass wir von der Suche umgeben werden. Das ist mit dem Konzept der "Ambient Findability" gemeint. Angelehnt ist diese Bezeichnung an den Begriff der "Ambient Music" (in den 70er Jahren durch Brian Eno geprägt), die den Hörer umgibt und von ihm oft gar nicht aktiv wahrgenommen wird. Um eine Vorstellung von dieser Musik zu bekommen, eignet sich vielleicht am besten der Titel einer Platte eben von Brian Eno: "Music for Airports". Peter Morville, bekannt als Co-Autor des empfehlenswerten Buchs "Information Architecture for the World Wide Web"', hat sich nun mit der Veränderung der Suche auseinandergesetzt. Sein Buch bedient sich in ganz unterschiedlichen Disziplinen, um die Prozesse des Suchens, Stöberns und Findens aufzuzeigen. So finden sich Betrachtungen über die Orientierung des Menschen in unbekannten Umgebungen, über die Interaktion mit Informationssystemen, über das soziale Verhalten der Web-Nutzer (Stichworte: Content-Tagging, Folksonomies, Social Networking) und über technische Veränderungen durch die Verfügbarkeit von Informationssystemen in allen Lebenskontexten, vor allem auch über mobile Endgeräte. Das Buch ist in sieben Kapitel gegliedert. Das erste, "Lost and Found" betitelt, bietet auf wenigen Seiten die Definitionen der zentralen Begriffe ambient und findability, erläutert kurz das Konzept der Information Literacy und zeigt, dass die bessere Auffindbarkeit von Informationen nicht nur ein schöner Zusatznutzen ist, sondern sich für Unternehmen deutlich auszahlt.

0.010262376 = product of:
  0.020524751 = sum of:
    0.020524751 = product of:
      0.041049503 = sum of:
        0.041049503 = weight(_text_:22 in 2404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041049503 = score(doc=2404,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17683028 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05049654 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2404, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2404)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

25.12.1998 19:22:31

0.010262376 = product of:
  0.020524751 = sum of:
    0.020524751 = product of:
      0.041049503 = sum of:
        0.041049503 = weight(_text_:22 in 281) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041049503 = score(doc=281,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17683028 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05049654 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 281, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=281)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

22. 3.2002 9:53:10

0.010262376 = product of:
  0.020524751 = sum of:
    0.020524751 = product of:
      0.041049503 = sum of:
        0.041049503 = weight(_text_:22 in 3450) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041049503 = score(doc=3450,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17683028 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05049654 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3450, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3450)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

10. 4.2005 14:52:22

0.010262376 = product of:
  0.020524751 = sum of:
    0.020524751 = product of:
      0.041049503 = sum of:
        0.041049503 = weight(_text_:22 in 3612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041049503 = score(doc=3612,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17683028 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05049654 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3612, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3612)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

2. 7.2005 12:22:50

0.010262376 = product of:
  0.020524751 = sum of:
    0.020524751 = product of:
      0.041049503 = sum of:
        0.041049503 = weight(_text_:22 in 5047) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041049503 = score(doc=5047,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17683028 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05049654 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5047, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5047)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

5. 6.2006 11:22:23

0.010262376 = product of:
  0.020524751 = sum of:
    0.020524751 = product of:
      0.041049503 = sum of:
        0.041049503 = weight(_text_:22 in 331) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041049503 = score(doc=331,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17683028 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05049654 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 331, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=331)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

27. 5.2007 13:55:22

0.010262376 = product of:
  0.020524751 = sum of:
    0.020524751 = product of:
      0.041049503 = sum of:
        0.041049503 = weight(_text_:22 in 813) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041049503 = score(doc=813,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17683028 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05049654 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 813, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=813)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

23.12.2007 12:22:16

0.010262376 = product of:
  0.020524751 = sum of:
    0.020524751 = product of:
      0.041049503 = sum of:
        0.041049503 = weight(_text_:22 in 3589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041049503 = score(doc=3589,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17683028 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05049654 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3589, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3589)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Information searching in practice seldom is an end in itself. In work, work task (WT) performance forms the context, which information searching should serve. Therefore, information retrieval (IR) systems development/evaluation should take the WT context into account. The present paper analyzes how WT features: task complexity and task types, affect information searching in authentic work: the types of information needs, search processes, and search media. We collected data on 22 information professionals in authentic work situations in three organization types: city administration, universities, and companies. The data comprise 286 WTs and 420 search tasks (STs). The data include transaction logs, video recordings, daily questionnaires, interviews. and observation. The data were analyzed quantitatively. Even if the participants used a range of search media, most STs were simple throughout the data, and up to 42% of WTs did not include searching. WT's effects on STs are not straightforward: different WT types react differently to WT complexity. Due to the simplicity of authentic searching, the WT/ST types in interactive IR experiments should be reconsidered.

0.00855198 = product of:
  0.01710396 = sum of:
    0.01710396 = product of:
      0.03420792 = sum of:
        0.03420792 = weight(_text_:22 in 297) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03420792 = score(doc=297,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17683028 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05049654 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 297, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=297)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

22. 3.2002 9:55:52