Search (10 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Fox, M.J."
  1. Martínez-Ávila, D.; Chaves Guimarães, J.A.; Pinho, F.A.; Fox, M.J.: ¬The representation of ethics and knowledge organization in the WoS and LISTA databases (2015) 0.06 
    0.064897 = product of:
  0.129794 = sum of:
    0.129794 = sum of:
      0.087560154 = weight(_text_:organization in 2358) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.087560154 = score(doc=2358,freq=8.0), product of:
          0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051953442 = queryNorm
          0.47270393 = fieldWeight in 2358, product of:
            2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
              8.0 = termFreq=8.0
            3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2358)
      0.042233843 = weight(_text_:22 in 2358) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.042233843 = score(doc=2358,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1819321 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051953442 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2358, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2358)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    A naïve user seeking introductory information on a topic may perceive a domain as it is shown by the search results in a database; however, inconsistencies in indexing can misrepresent the full picture of the domain by including irrelevant documents or omitting relevant ones, sometimes inexplicably. A bibliometric analysis was conducted on the domain of ethics in knowledge organization in the World of Science (WoS) and Library, Information Science & Technology Abstracts (LISTA) databases to discern how it is being presented by search results in those databases and to attempt to determine why inconsistencies occurred.
    Content
    Beitrag anlässlich: Proceedings of the 3rd Milwaukee Conference on Ethics in Knowledge Organization, May 28-29, 2015, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, USA. Vgl.: http://www.ergon-verlag.de/isko_ko/downloads/ko_42_2015_5.
    Date
    17. 2.2018 16:50:22
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 42(2015) no.5, S.269-275
  2. Fox, M.J.: Medical discourse's epistemic influence on gender classification in three editions of the Dewey Decimal Classification (2014) 0.05 
    0.052074112 = product of:
  0.104148224 = sum of:
    0.104148224 = sum of:
      0.061914384 = weight(_text_:organization in 1427) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.061914384 = score(doc=1427,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051953442 = queryNorm
          0.33425218 = fieldWeight in 1427, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1427)
      0.042233843 = weight(_text_:22 in 1427) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.042233843 = score(doc=1427,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1819321 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051953442 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1427, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1427)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Series
    Advances in knowledge organization; vol. 14
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  3. Fox, M.J.; Reece, A.: Which ethics? Whose morality? : an analysis of ethical standards for information organization (2012) 0.03 
    0.028957801 = product of:
  0.057915602 = sum of:
    0.057915602 = product of:
      0.115831204 = sum of:
        0.115831204 = weight(_text_:organization in 424) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.115831204 = score(doc=424,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051953442 = queryNorm
            0.62532854 = fieldWeight in 424, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=424)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Ethical standards are required at both the individual and system levels of the information organization enterprise, but are those standards the same? For example, are the ethical responsibilities of DDC's editorial board fundamentally the same as for an individual cataloger? And, what are the consequences of decisions made using different ethical frameworks to the users of knowledge organization systems? A selection of ethical theories suitable for evaluating moral dilemmas at all levels in information organization is presented, including utilitarianism, deontology, and pragmatism, as well as the more contemporary approaches of justice, feminist, and Derridean ethics. Finally, a selection of criteria is outlined, taken from the existing ethical frameworks, to use as a starting point for development of an ethical framework specifically for information organization.
    Content
    Beitrag aus einem Themenheft zu den Proceedings of the 2nd Milwaukee Conference on Ethics in Information Organization, June 15-16, 2012, School of Information Studies, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee. Hope A. Olson, Conference Chair. Vgl.: http://www.ergon-verlag.de/isko_ko/downloads/ko_39_2012_5_j.pdf.
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 39(2012) no.5, S.377-383
  4. Fox, M.J.: 'Priorities of arrangement' or a 'hierarchy of oppressions?' : perspectives on intersectionality in knowledge organization (2016) 0.02 
    0.022341428 = product of:
  0.044682857 = sum of:
    0.044682857 = product of:
      0.08936571 = sum of:
        0.08936571 = weight(_text_:organization in 3174) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08936571 = score(doc=3174,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051953442 = queryNorm
            0.48245144 = fieldWeight in 3174, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3174)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The hallmark of Hope Olson's work has been to use a different set of analytical tools to examine our knowledge organization systems from humanistic, feminist, and philosophical angles. These perspectives have led to the uncovering of many instances and types of bias that lead to the marginalization of human groups. An important phenomenon her work has illuminated is intersectionality, a concept that arose from identity studies but has a literal embodiment in knowledge organization environments. Intersectionality describes the transformative, interlocking, and conflicting oppressions that occur when humans belong to more than one identity category. The concept arose with black women (but is not restricted to women) and has since extended to different variables beyond gender and race, such as sexual orientation, national origin, or able-bodiedness. In knowledge organization systems, mutual exclusivity, linearity, and hierarchy prohibit an easy solution for intersectional topics. Topics can be structurally or semantically misrepresented or erased. This article builds upon Olson's research to provide theoretical context from identity studies, further examples from knowledge organization, and describes some of the proposed methods of managing intersectionality.
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 43(2016) no.5, S.373-383
  5. Fox, M.J.; Reece, A.: ¬The impossible decision : social tagging and Derrida's deconstructed hospitality (2013) 0.02 
    0.022116886 = product of:
  0.044233773 = sum of:
    0.044233773 = product of:
      0.088467546 = sum of:
        0.088467546 = weight(_text_:organization in 1067) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.088467546 = score(doc=1067,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051953442 = queryNorm
            0.47760257 = fieldWeight in 1067, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1067)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Knowledge organization structures are dependent upon domain-analytical processes for determining ontological imperatives. Boundary objects-terms used in multiple domains but understood differently in each-are ontological clash points. Cognitive Work Analysis is an effective qualitative methodology for domain analysis of a group of people who work together. CWA was used recently to understand the ontology of a human resources firm. Boundary objects from the taxonomy that emerged from narrative analysis are presented here for individual analysis.
    Footnote
    Part of a section: "Papers from the Fourth North American Symposium on Knowledge Organization, sponsored by ISKO-Canada, United States, 13-14 June, 2013, Milwaukee, Wisconsin"
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 40(2013) no.4, S.260-265
  6. Miller, S.J.; Fox, M.J.; Lee, H.L.; Hope, H.A.: Great expectations : professionals' perceptions and knowledge organization curricula (2006) 0.02 
    0.021890039 = product of:
  0.043780077 = sum of:
    0.043780077 = product of:
      0.087560154 = sum of:
        0.087560154 = weight(_text_:organization in 253) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.087560154 = score(doc=253,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051953442 = queryNorm
            0.47270393 = fieldWeight in 253, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=253)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    A disparity seems to exist between the expectations that librarians have of education for the knowledge organization (KO) and what is taught in accredited master's programs across the United States and Canada. Analysis of official competencies, AUTOCAT discussion list postings, previous studies, and LIS curricula suggests that although many practitioners express this mismatch, the data reveal that KO competencies are hardly marginalized in curricula, and there is a large degree of consensus on what educators should and do offer. The analysis also indicates that there may be a "mismatch" in perception about the state of KO education and curricular offerings today within both the practitioner and educator communities.
    Series
    Advances in knowledge organization; vol.10
    Source
    Knowledge organization for a global learning society: Proceedings of the 9th International ISKO Conference, 4-7 July 2006, Vienna, Austria. Hrsg.: G. Budin, C. Swertz u. K. Mitgutsch
  7. Fox, M.J.; Wilkerson, P.L.; Warren, S.R.: Introduction to archival organization and description (1999) 0.02 
    0.0182417 = product of:
  0.0364834 = sum of:
    0.0364834 = product of:
      0.0729668 = sum of:
        0.0729668 = weight(_text_:organization in 3126) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0729668 = score(doc=3126,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051953442 = queryNorm
            0.39391994 = fieldWeight in 3126, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3126)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  8. Kipp, M.E.I.; Beak, J.; Graf, A.M.; Fox, M.J.: Tagging of banned and challenged books (2015) 0.02 
    0.018058361 = product of:
  0.036116723 = sum of:
    0.036116723 = product of:
      0.072233446 = sum of:
        0.072233446 = weight(_text_:organization in 2359) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.072233446 = score(doc=2359,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051953442 = queryNorm
            0.38996086 = fieldWeight in 2359, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2359)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Beitrag anlässlich: Proceedings of the 3rd Milwaukee Conference on Ethics in Knowledge Organization, May 28-29, 2015, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, USA. Vgl.: http://www.ergon-verlag.de/isko_ko/downloads/ko_42_2015_5.
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 42(2015) no.5, S.276-283
  9. Fox, M.J.: Prototype theory : an alternative concept theory for categorizing sex and gender? (2011) 0.02 
    0.015478596 = product of:
  0.030957192 = sum of:
    0.030957192 = product of:
      0.061914384 = sum of:
        0.061914384 = weight(_text_:organization in 4614) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.061914384 = score(doc=4614,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051953442 = queryNorm
            0.33425218 = fieldWeight in 4614, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4614)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Papers from the Third North American Symposium on Knowledge Organization, June 16-17, Toronto, Canada.
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 38(2011) no.4, S.328-334
  10. Fox, M.J.: Communities of practice, gender and social tagging (2012) 0.02 
    0.015478596 = product of:
  0.030957192 = sum of:
    0.030957192 = product of:
      0.061914384 = sum of:
        0.061914384 = weight(_text_:organization in 873) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.061914384 = score(doc=873,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051953442 = queryNorm
            0.33425218 = fieldWeight in 873, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=873)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Series
    Advances in knowledge organization; vol.13
    Source
    Categories, contexts and relations in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the Twelfth International ISKO Conference 6-9 August 2012, Mysore, India. Eds.: Neelameghan, A. u. K.S. Raghavan

Authors

Years

Types

Themes