-
Byrum, J.D.: ¬The emerging global bibliographical network : the era of international standardization in the development of cataloging policy (2000)
0.07
0.07434991 = product of:
0.14869982 = sum of:
0.14869982 = sum of:
0.11424282 = weight(_text_:policy in 190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11424282 = score(doc=190,freq=4.0), product of:
0.2727254 = queryWeight, product of:
5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
0.05086421 = queryNorm
0.41889322 = fieldWeight in 190, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=190)
0.03445699 = weight(_text_:22 in 190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03445699 = score(doc=190,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1781178 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05086421 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 190, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=190)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Catalogers have become interdependent in their pursuit to provide bibliographic control and access. This interdependency has brought with it the need for greater agreement in applying common cataloging policies and rules. The expanded application of AACR2 (Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules) is fostering greater uniformity in the provision of bibliographic description and access. The rules have been translated into numerous languages and used in European, Middle Eastern, and Latin American countries. Cataloging committees and individual libraries in Europe and South Africa have expressed strong interest in adopting, adapting, or aligning with AACR2. PCC (Program for Cooperative Cataloguing) is one of the most successful cooperative cataloging efforts and has a considerable international component, which encourages the use of AACR, LCSH (Library of Congress Subject Headings), and MARC. AACR2 is successful on an international level because it is based in internationally developed standards, including ISBDs and the Paris Principles. ISBDs (International Standard Bibliographic Description) and the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records are examples of the contributions that IFLA (International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions) has made to the internationalization of cataloging. IFLA sponsored the international conference that resulted in the Paris Principles as well as subsequent projects to craft international policy in relation to uniform headings for persons, corporate bodies, and titles.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Pohl, A.: OCLC, WorldCat und die Metadaten-Kontroverse (2009)
0.05
0.045697127 = product of:
0.09139425 = sum of:
0.09139425 = product of:
0.1827885 = sum of:
0.1827885 = weight(_text_:policy in 2780) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1827885 = score(doc=2780,freq=16.0), product of:
0.2727254 = queryWeight, product of:
5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
0.05086421 = queryNorm
0.67022914 = fieldWeight in 2780, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2780)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Mit der Ankündigung einer "Policy for Use and Transfer of WorldCat Records" hat OCLC (Online Computer Library Center) in der angelsächsischen Bibliothekswelt eine lebhafte Diskussion hervorgerufen. Im deutschsprachigen Raum hat die geplante Policy allerdings bisher sehr wenig Resonanz gefunden. Ein Grund mag darin liegen, dass OCLC in Europa (noch) deutlich weniger Gewicht hat als in den USA. Sicher hätte das Inkrafttreten einer OCLC-Metadaten-Policy (ganz gleich, wie sie ausgestaltet sein mag) weitreichende Auswirkungen auf das weltweite Bibliothekswesen. Eine Beschäftigung mit dem Thema ist also mehr als angebracht. Dieser Artikel dient dem Zweck, den Stand der Diskussion im angelsächsischen Raum wiederzugeben und einen Einblick in die verschiedenen Aspekte der Auseinandersetzung zu geben.
- Content
- "Hintergründe Das Online Computer Library Center (OCLC) mit Sitz in Dublin (Ohio) präsentiert sich als eine Non-Profit-Mitgliederorganisation, "die sich im öffentlichen Interesse für den breiteren, computergestützten Zugang zum weltweiten Wissen und die Senkung der damit verbundenen Kosten einsetzt." Im globalen Maßstab ist OCLC die größte Organisation im Bibliothekswesen, mit knapp 70.000 Mitgliedsbibliotheken in über 100 Ländern . Das Fundament von OCLC bildet der WorldCat, dessen Konzept dem eines Verbundkatalogs entspricht: eine bibliografische Online-Datenbank für die gemeinsame Katalogisierung, in der auch die Bestandsdaten der beteiligten Bibliotheken erfasst sind. Auf dieser Datenbank baut eine große Zahl der OCLC-Dienstleistungen auf, seien dies Katalogisierungs- und Metadatendienste, Recherchewerkzeuge für Endnutzer, Fernleihdienste oder Bestandsanalyse- und -managementwerkzeuge. Für die Teilnahme am WorldCat sowie die Fremddatenübernahme aus dem WorldCat berechnet OCLC den Mitgliedsinstitutionen nicht unbeträchtliche Summen. Die Einnahmen aus WorldCat-Gebühren und Fremddatendiensten machen mehr als ein Drittel der Gesamteinnahmen OCLCs aus: Im Steuerjahr 2007/2008 betrugen die Einnahmen OCLCs aus Metadatendiensten nach Unternehmensangaben 85,8 Millionen US-$. Das sind knapp 35% der Gesamteinnahmen von 246,4 Millionen US-$ im selben Jahr.6 Man kann OCLC also ein großes finanzielles Interesse daran unterstellen, diesen Datenpool weiterhin unter eigener Kontrolle zu halten, damit die gewohnten Gewinnströme nicht versiegen. Vor diesem Hintergrund nimmt es nicht wunder, dass OCLC versucht eine Policy einzuführen, welche die Geldströme auch in Zukunft sichern soll. Mit der Ankündigung dieser rechtsverbindlichen Regelung hat OCLC Anfang November 2008 die Gemüter kritischer Bibliothekare und von Open-Data-Verfechtern erhitzt. Viele Passagen der Policy erwecken den Eindruck, dass sich OCLC ein Monopol auf die WorldCat-Daten sichern will und Konkurrenz auszuschalten versucht. Die Reaktionen - besonders in der US-amerikanischen Blogosphäre - waren harsch, wodurch bereits einige Änderungen der Policy erreicht worden sind. Mitte Januar hat OCLC nun als Erwiderung auf die vehemente Kritik den geplanten Termin des Inkrafttretens der Policy nach hinten verlegt: von Mitte Februar auf das Dritte Quartal 2009. Mit dem Review "Board of Shared Data Creation and Stewardship" hat OCLC zudem ein Gremium einberufen, das indessen mit OCLC-Mitgliedern und anderen Beteiligten in Kontakt treten soll, um den Policy-Entwurf zu überarbeiten."
-
Lubetzky, S.: Writings on the classical art of cataloging (2001)
0.02
0.020674193 = product of:
0.041348387 = sum of:
0.041348387 = product of:
0.08269677 = sum of:
0.08269677 = weight(_text_:22 in 2622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08269677 = score(doc=2622,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1781178 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05086421 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2622, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2622)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Technicalities 22(2002) no.1, S.19-20 (S.S. Intner)
-
Aliprand, J.M.: ¬The Unicode Standard : its scope, design prin. ciples, and prospects for international cataloging (2000)
0.02
0.017228495 = product of:
0.03445699 = sum of:
0.03445699 = product of:
0.06891398 = sum of:
0.06891398 = weight(_text_:22 in 4608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06891398 = score(doc=4608,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1781178 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05086421 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4608, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4608)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
LeBlanc, J.; Kurth, M.: ¬An operational model for library metadata maintenance (2008)
0.01
0.014618864 = product of:
0.029237729 = sum of:
0.029237729 = product of:
0.058475457 = sum of:
0.058475457 = weight(_text_:22 in 101) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.058475457 = score(doc=101,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1781178 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05086421 = queryNorm
0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 101, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=101)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
19. 6.2010 19:22:28
-
Markey, K.: ¬The online library catalog : paradise lost and paradise regained? (2007)
0.01
0.014136827 = product of:
0.028273653 = sum of:
0.028273653 = product of:
0.056547306 = sum of:
0.056547306 = weight(_text_:policy in 1172) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056547306 = score(doc=1172,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2727254 = queryWeight, product of:
5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
0.05086421 = queryNorm
0.20734155 = fieldWeight in 1172, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1172)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The impetus for this essay is the library community's uncertainty regarding the present and future direction of the library catalog in the era of Google and mass digitization projects. The uncertainty is evident at the highest levels. Deanna Marcum, Associate Librarian for Library Services at the Library of Congress (LC), is struck by undergraduate students who favor digital resources over the online library catalog because such resources are available at anytime and from anywhere (Marcum, 2006). She suggests that "the detailed attention that we have been paying to descriptive cataloging may no longer be justified ... retooled catalogers could give more time to authority control, subject analysis, [and] resource identification and evaluation" (Marcum, 2006, 8). In an abrupt about-face, LC terminated series added entries in cataloging records, one of the few subject-rich fields in such records (Cataloging Policy and Support Office, 2006). Mann (2006b) and Schniderman (2006) cite evidence of LC's prevailing viewpoint in favor of simplifying cataloging at the expense of subject cataloging. LC commissioned Karen Calhoun (2006) to prepare a report on "revitalizing" the online library catalog. Calhoun's directive is clear: divert resources from cataloging mass-produced formats (e.g., books) to cataloging the unique primary sources (e.g., archives, special collections, teaching objects, research by-products). She sums up her rationale for such a directive, "The existing local catalog's market position has eroded to the point where there is real concern for its ability to weather the competition for information seekers' attention" (p. 10). At the University of California Libraries (2005), a task force's recommendations parallel those in Calhoun report especially regarding the elimination of subject headings in favor of automatically generated metadata. Contemplating these events prompted me to revisit the glorious past of the online library catalog. For a decade and a half beginning in the early 1980s, the online library catalog was the jewel in the crown when people eagerly queued at its terminals to find information written by the world's experts. I despair how eagerly people now embrace Google because of the suspect provenance of the information Google retrieves. Long ago, we could have added more value to the online library catalog but the only thing we changed was the catalog's medium. Our failure to act back then cost the online catalog the crown. Now that the era of mass digitization has begun, we have a second chance at redesigning the online library catalog, getting it right, coaxing back old users, and attracting new ones. Let's revisit the past, reconsidering missed opportunities, reassessing their merits, combining them with new directions, making bold decisions and acting decisively on them.
-
El-Sherbini, M.A.: Cataloging and classification : review of the literature 2005-06 (2008)
0.01
0.013782796 = product of:
0.027565593 = sum of:
0.027565593 = product of:
0.055131186 = sum of:
0.055131186 = weight(_text_:22 in 249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055131186 = score(doc=249,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1781178 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05086421 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 249, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=249)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Budd, J.: Exploring categorization : undergraduate student searching and the evolution of catalogs (2007)
0.01
0.013782796 = product of:
0.027565593 = sum of:
0.027565593 = product of:
0.055131186 = sum of:
0.055131186 = weight(_text_:22 in 256) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055131186 = score(doc=256,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1781178 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05086421 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 256, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=256)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Miksa, S.D.: ¬The challenges of change : a review of cataloging and classification literature, 2003-2004 (2007)
0.01
0.013782796 = product of:
0.027565593 = sum of:
0.027565593 = product of:
0.055131186 = sum of:
0.055131186 = weight(_text_:22 in 266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055131186 = score(doc=266,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1781178 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05086421 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 266, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=266)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Schneider, R.: OPACs, Benutzer und das Web (2009)
0.01
0.013782796 = product of:
0.027565593 = sum of:
0.027565593 = product of:
0.055131186 = sum of:
0.055131186 = weight(_text_:22 in 2905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055131186 = score(doc=2905,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1781178 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05086421 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2905, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2905)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 2.2009 18:50:43
-
Erdei, K.: Kein Umzug für Zettel : Die digitalisierten Kataloge im Neubau der UB Kiel (2001)
0.01
0.012059947 = product of:
0.024119893 = sum of:
0.024119893 = product of:
0.048239786 = sum of:
0.048239786 = weight(_text_:22 in 5777) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048239786 = score(doc=5777,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1781178 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05086421 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5777, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5777)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 28. 4.2001 16:49:22
-
Bowman, J.H.: ¬The catalog as barrier to retrieval : Part 1: hyphens and ampersands in titles (2000)
0.01
0.012059947 = product of:
0.024119893 = sum of:
0.024119893 = product of:
0.048239786 = sum of:
0.048239786 = weight(_text_:22 in 5365) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048239786 = score(doc=5365,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1781178 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05086421 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5365, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5365)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- An Internet survey of 38 different OPAC systems, at eighty different libraries, was undertaken to investigate the effect on retrieval of the presence of the hyphen or the ampersand in titles. Title and Keyword searches were performed. In Title search, 22 of the systems treat the hyphen as equivalent to a space, while in Keyword the number is 16. The other systems treat it in various different ways (even including the equivalent of NOT), which means that results of searching multiple catalogs are very inconsistent. The ampersand may be ignored, treated as a special character, or treated as "and," again with very inconsistent results. Various recommendations are made with a view to improving consistency of performance.
-
Marcum, D.B.: ¬The future of cataloging (2006)
0.01
0.012059947 = product of:
0.024119893 = sum of:
0.024119893 = product of:
0.048239786 = sum of:
0.048239786 = weight(_text_:22 in 114) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048239786 = score(doc=114,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1781178 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05086421 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 114, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=114)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Bates, M.J.: Speculations on browsing, directed searching, and linking in relation to the Bradford distribution (2002)
0.01
0.010337097 = product of:
0.020674193 = sum of:
0.020674193 = product of:
0.041348387 = sum of:
0.041348387 = weight(_text_:22 in 54) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041348387 = score(doc=54,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1781178 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05086421 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 54, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=54)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 2.2007 18:56:23
-
Neubauer, W.: Von Bibliothekskatalogen zu Wissensportalen (2006)
0.01
0.010337097 = product of:
0.020674193 = sum of:
0.020674193 = product of:
0.041348387 = sum of:
0.041348387 = weight(_text_:22 in 1757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041348387 = score(doc=1757,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1781178 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05086421 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1757, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1757)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 3.2008 12:40:17
-
Arsenault, C.; Ménard, E.: Searching titles with initial articles in library catalogs : a case study and search behavior analysis (2007)
0.01
0.010337097 = product of:
0.020674193 = sum of:
0.020674193 = product of:
0.041348387 = sum of:
0.041348387 = weight(_text_:22 in 2264) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041348387 = score(doc=2264,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1781178 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05086421 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2264, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2264)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Behrens-Neumann, R.: Aus der 55. Sitzung der Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Verbundsysteme am 5. und 6. November 2008 in Frankfurt am Main (2009)
0.01
0.008614248 = product of:
0.017228495 = sum of:
0.017228495 = product of:
0.03445699 = sum of:
0.03445699 = weight(_text_:22 in 2778) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03445699 = score(doc=2778,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1781178 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05086421 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2778, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2778)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 2.2009 19:35:56
-
Frâncu, V.: ¬An interpretation of the FRBR model (2004)
0.01
0.006891398 = product of:
0.013782796 = sum of:
0.013782796 = product of:
0.027565593 = sum of:
0.027565593 = weight(_text_:22 in 2647) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027565593 = score(doc=2647,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1781178 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05086421 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2647, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2647)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 17. 6.2015 14:40:22
-
Scheerer, H.: Gülich online : Die Retrokonversion des Zettelkatalogs der Bundestagsbibliothek (2007)
0.01
0.006891398 = product of:
0.013782796 = sum of:
0.013782796 = product of:
0.027565593 = sum of:
0.027565593 = weight(_text_:22 in 513) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027565593 = score(doc=513,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1781178 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05086421 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 513, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=513)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 8.2007 11:43:43
-
DeZelar-Tiedman, V.: Doing the LibraryThing(TM) in an academic library catalog (2008)
0.01
0.006891398 = product of:
0.013782796 = sum of:
0.013782796 = product of:
0.027565593 = sum of:
0.027565593 = weight(_text_:22 in 2666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027565593 = score(doc=2666,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1781178 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05086421 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2666, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2666)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
