Search (259 results, page 1 of 13)

  • × theme_ss:"Benutzerstudien"
  1. Branch, J.L.: Investigating the information-seeking process of adolescents : the value of using think alouds and think afters (2000) 0.08
    0.08248854 = product of:
      0.16497707 = sum of:
        0.16497707 = sum of:
          0.06581766 = weight(_text_:research in 3924) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06581766 = score(doc=3924,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1491455 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05227703 = queryNorm
              0.44129837 = fieldWeight in 3924, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3924)
          0.09915942 = weight(_text_:22 in 3924) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.09915942 = score(doc=3924,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18306525 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05227703 = queryNorm
              0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3924, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3924)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Library and information science research. 22(2000) no.4, S.371-382
  2. Okoli, C.; Mehdi, M.; Mesgari, M.; Nielsen, F.A.; Lanamäki, A.: Wikipedia in the eyes of its beholders : a systematic review of scholarly research on Wikipedia readers and readership (2014) 0.05
    0.04945602 = product of:
      0.09891204 = sum of:
        0.09891204 = sum of:
          0.056415144 = weight(_text_:research in 1540) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.056415144 = score(doc=1540,freq=8.0), product of:
              0.1491455 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05227703 = queryNorm
              0.37825575 = fieldWeight in 1540, product of:
                2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                  8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1540)
          0.042496894 = weight(_text_:22 in 1540) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042496894 = score(doc=1540,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18306525 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05227703 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1540, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1540)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Hundreds of scholarly studies have investigated various aspects of Wikipedia. Although a number of literature reviews have provided overviews of this vast body of research, none has specifically focused on the readers of Wikipedia and issues concerning its readership. In this systematic literature review, we review 99 studies to synthesize current knowledge regarding the readership of Wikipedia and provide an analysis of research methods employed. The scholarly research has found that Wikipedia is popular not only for lighter topics such as entertainment but also for more serious topics such as health and legal information. Scholars, librarians, and students are common users, and Wikipedia provides a unique opportunity for educating students in digital literacy. We conclude with a summary of key findings, implications for researchers, and implications for the Wikipedia community.
    Date
    18.11.2014 13:22:03
  3. Berger, F.C.; Hofstede, A.H.M. ter; Van der Weide, T.P.: Supporting query by navigation (1996) 0.05
    0.048059914 = product of:
      0.09611983 = sum of:
        0.09611983 = sum of:
          0.04654012 = weight(_text_:research in 6966) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04654012 = score(doc=6966,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.1491455 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05227703 = queryNorm
              0.31204507 = fieldWeight in 6966, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6966)
          0.04957971 = weight(_text_:22 in 6966) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04957971 = score(doc=6966,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18306525 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05227703 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6966, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6966)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Information retrieval: new systems and current research. Proceedings of the 16th Research Colloquium of the British Computer Society Information Retrieval Specialist Group, Drymen, Scotland, 22-23 Mar 94. Ed.: R. Leon
  4. Wildemuth, B.M.: Effective methods for studying information seeking and use : Introduction and overview (2002) 0.04
    0.041213352 = product of:
      0.082426704 = sum of:
        0.082426704 = sum of:
          0.047012623 = weight(_text_:research in 1257) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.047012623 = score(doc=1257,freq=8.0), product of:
              0.1491455 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05227703 = queryNorm
              0.31521314 = fieldWeight in 1257, product of:
                2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                  8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1257)
          0.03541408 = weight(_text_:22 in 1257) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03541408 = score(doc=1257,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18306525 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05227703 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1257, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1257)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    In conjunction with the American Society for Information Science and Technology's (ASIST) annual meeting in fall 2001, the Special Interest Group an Information Needs, Seeking, and Use (SIG USE) sponsored a research symposium an "Effective Methods for Studying Information Seeking and Use." The symposium was intended to address the SIG's goal of promoting studies of human information behavior by focusing an the research methods that can most effectively be used to study information needs, information seeking, information use, and other human information behaviors. The symposium included the presentation of six refereed articles, which were revised based an the discussion at the symposium and are included here. The six articles describe the application of a variety of research methods, singly or in combination. Some of the methods are most appropriate for studying individuals and their interactions with information, while others can be applied to studying group behaviors. The studies were conducted in a variety of settings, from a Web-searching laboratory to an archive, from hospitals to the great outdoors (i.e., forest and river sites). Each method or set of methods was applied to a particular user group, including young children, teenagers, and adults. Each article makes a unique contribution to our repertoire of research methods, as briefly reviewed here.
    Date
    20. 1.2003 9:37:22
  5. Bilal, D.: Children's use of the Yahooligans! Web search engine : III. Cognitive and physical behaviors on fully self-generated search tasks (2002) 0.04
    0.04119421 = product of:
      0.08238842 = sum of:
        0.08238842 = sum of:
          0.03989153 = weight(_text_:research in 5228) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03989153 = score(doc=5228,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.1491455 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05227703 = queryNorm
              0.2674672 = fieldWeight in 5228, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5228)
          0.042496894 = weight(_text_:22 in 5228) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042496894 = score(doc=5228,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18306525 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05227703 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5228, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5228)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Bilal, in this third part of her Yahooligans! study looks at children's performance with self-generated search tasks, as compared to previously assigned search tasks looking for differences in success, cognitive behavior, physical behavior, and task preference. Lotus ScreenCam was used to record interactions and post search interviews to record impressions. The subjects, the same 22 seventh grade children in the previous studies, generated topics of interest that were mediated with the researcher into more specific topics where necessary. Fifteen usable sessions form the basis of the study. Eleven children were successful in finding information, a rate of 73% compared to 69% in assigned research questions, and 50% in assigned fact-finding questions. Eighty-seven percent began using one or two keyword searches. Spelling was a problem. Successful children made fewer keyword searches and the number of search moves averaged 5.5 as compared to 2.4 on the research oriented task and 3.49 on the factual. Backtracking and looping were common. The self-generated task was preferred by 47% of the subjects.
  6. Borgman, C.L.; Smart, L.J.; Millwood, K.A.; Finley, J.R.; Champeny, L.; Gilliland, A.J.; Leazer, G.H.: Comparing faculty information seeking in teaching and research : implications for the design of digital libraries (2005) 0.04
    0.040759984 = product of:
      0.08151997 = sum of:
        0.08151997 = sum of:
          0.053188704 = weight(_text_:research in 3231) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.053188704 = score(doc=3231,freq=16.0), product of:
              0.1491455 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05227703 = queryNorm
              0.35662293 = fieldWeight in 3231, product of:
                4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                  16.0 = termFreq=16.0
                2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3231)
          0.028331263 = weight(_text_:22 in 3231) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.028331263 = score(doc=3231,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18306525 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05227703 = queryNorm
              0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 3231, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3231)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    ADEPT is a 5-year project whose goals are to develop, deploy, and evaluate inquiry learning capabilities for the Alexandria Digital Library, an extant digital library of primary sources in geography. We interviewed nine geography faculty members who teach undergraduate courses about their information seeking for research and teaching and their use of information resources in teaching. These data were supplemented by interviews with four faculty members from another ADEPT study about the nature of knowledge in geography. Among our key findings are that geography faculty are more likely to encounter useful teaching resources while seeking research resources than vice versa, although the influence goes in both directions. Their greatest information needs are for research data, maps, and images. They desire better searching by concept or theme, in addition to searching by location and place name. They make extensive use of their own research resources in their teaching. Among the implications for functionality and architecture of geographic digital libraries for educational use are that personal digital libraries are essential, because individual faculty members have personalized approaches to selecting, collecting, and organizing teaching resources. Digital library services for research and teaching should include the ability to import content from common office software and to store content in standard formats that can be exported to other applications. Digital library services can facilitate sharing among faculty but cannot overcome barriers such as intellectual property rights, access to proprietary research data, or the desire of individuals to maintain control over their own resources. Faculty use of primary and secondary resources needs to be better understood if we are to design successful digital libraries for research and teaching.
    Date
    3. 6.2005 20:40:22
  7. Byström, K.: Information seekers in context : an analysis of the 'doer' in INSU studies (1999) 0.04
    0.038064104 = product of:
      0.07612821 = sum of:
        0.07612821 = sum of:
          0.040714126 = weight(_text_:research in 297) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.040714126 = score(doc=297,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.1491455 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05227703 = queryNorm
              0.2729826 = fieldWeight in 297, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=297)
          0.03541408 = weight(_text_:22 in 297) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03541408 = score(doc=297,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18306525 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05227703 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 297, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=297)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    In information needs, seeking and use (INSU) research, individuals have most commonly been perceived as users (e.g., Kuhlthau, 1991; Dervin & Nilan, 1986; Dervin, 1989; Belkin, 1980). The concept user originates from the user of libraries and other information services and information systems. Over the years the scope of the concept has become wider and it is nowadays often understood in the sense of seekers of information (e.g., Wilson, 1981; Marchionini, 1995) and users of information (e.g., Streatfield, 1983). Nevertheless, the concept has remained ambiguous by being on the one hand universal and on the other hand extremely specific. The purpose of this paper is to map and evaluate views on people whose information behaviour has been in one way or another the core of our research area. The goal is to shed some light on various relationships between the different aspects of doers in INSU studies. The paper is inspired by Dervin's (1997) analysis of context where she identified among other themes the nature of subject by contrasting a `transcendental individual' with a `decentered subject', and Talja's (1997) presentation about constituting `information' and `user' from the discourse analytic viewpoint as opposed to the cognitive viewpoint. Instead of the metatheoretical approach applied by Dervin and Talja, a more concrete approach is valid in the present analysis where no direct arguments for or against the underlying metatheories are itemised. The focus is on doers in INSU studies leaving other, even closely-related concepts (i.e., information, information seeking, knowledge etc.), outside the scope of the paper.
    Date
    22. 3.2002 9:55:52
    Source
    Exploring the contexts of information behaviour: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Research in Information Needs, Seeking and Use in Different Contexts, Sheffield, UK, 1998. Ed. by D.K. Wilson u. D.K. Allen
  8. Agosto, D.E.: Bounded rationality and satisficing in young people's Web-based decision making (2002) 0.04
    0.035352234 = product of:
      0.07070447 = sum of:
        0.07070447 = sum of:
          0.028207572 = weight(_text_:research in 177) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.028207572 = score(doc=177,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1491455 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05227703 = queryNorm
              0.18912788 = fieldWeight in 177, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=177)
          0.042496894 = weight(_text_:22 in 177) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042496894 = score(doc=177,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18306525 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05227703 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 177, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=177)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This study investigated Simon's behavioral decisionmaking theories of bounded rationality and satisficing in relation to young people's decision making in the World Wide Web, and considered the role of personal preferences in Web-based decisions. It employed a qualitative research methodology involving group interviews with 22 adolescent females. Data analysis took the form of iterative pattern coding using QSR NUD*IST Vivo qualitative data analysis software. Data analysis revealed that the study participants did operate within the limits of bounded rationality. These limits took the form of time constraints, information overload, and physical constraints. Data analysis also uncovered two major satisficing behaviors-reduction and termination. Personal preference was found to play a major role in Web site evaluation in the areas of graphic/multimedia and subject content preferences. This study has related implications for Web site designers and for adult intermediaries who work with young people and the Web
  9. Aloteibi, S.; Sanderson, M.: Analyzing geographic query reformulation : an exploratory study (2014) 0.03
    0.034328513 = product of:
      0.068657026 = sum of:
        0.068657026 = sum of:
          0.03324294 = weight(_text_:research in 1177) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03324294 = score(doc=1177,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.1491455 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05227703 = queryNorm
              0.22288933 = fieldWeight in 1177, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1177)
          0.03541408 = weight(_text_:22 in 1177) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03541408 = score(doc=1177,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18306525 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05227703 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1177, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1177)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Search engine users typically engage in multiquery sessions in their quest to fulfill their information needs. Despite a plethora of research findings suggesting that a significant group of users look for information within a specific geographical scope, existing reformulation studies lack a focused analysis of how users reformulate geographic queries. This study comprehensively investigates the ways in which users reformulate such needs in an attempt to fill this gap in the literature. Reformulated sessions were sampled from a query log of a major search engine to extract 2,400 entries that were manually inspected to filter geo sessions. This filter identified 471 search sessions that included geographical intent, and these sessions were analyzed quantitatively and qualitatively. The results revealed that one in five of the users who reformulated their queries were looking for geographically related information. They reformulated their queries by changing the content of the query rather than the structure. Users were not following a unified sequence of modifications and instead performed a single reformulation action. However, in some cases it was possible to anticipate their next move. A number of tasks in geo modifications were identified, including standard, multi-needs, multi-places, and hybrid approaches. The research concludes that it is important to specialize query reformulation studies to focus on particular query types rather than generically analyzing them, as it is apparent that geographic queries have their special reformulation characteristics.
    Date
    26. 1.2014 18:48:22
  10. Beaudoin, J.E.: Content-based image retrieval methods and professional image users (2016) 0.03
    0.034328513 = product of:
      0.068657026 = sum of:
        0.068657026 = sum of:
          0.03324294 = weight(_text_:research in 2637) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03324294 = score(doc=2637,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.1491455 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05227703 = queryNorm
              0.22288933 = fieldWeight in 2637, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2637)
          0.03541408 = weight(_text_:22 in 2637) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03541408 = score(doc=2637,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18306525 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05227703 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2637, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2637)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This article reports the findings of a qualitative research study that examined professional image users' knowledge of, and interest in using, content-based image retrieval (CBIR) systems in an attempt to clarify when and where CBIR methods might be applied. The research sought to determine the differences in the perceived usefulness of CBIR technologies among image user groups from several domains and explicate the reasons given regarding the utility of CBIR systems for their professional tasks. Twenty participants (archaeologists, architects, art historians, and artists), individuals who rely on images of cultural materials in the performance of their work, took part in the study. The findings of the study reveal that interest in CBIR methods varied among the different professional user communities. Individuals who showed an interest in these systems were primarily those concerned with the formal characteristics (i.e., color, shape, composition, and texture) of the images being sought. In contrast, those participants who expressed a strong interest in images of known items, images illustrating themes, and/or items from specific locations believe concept-based searches to be the most direct route. These image users did not see a practical application for CBIR systems in their current work routines.
    Date
    22. 1.2016 12:32:25
  11. Belkin, N.J.: ¬An overview of results from Rutgers' investigations of interactive information retrieval (1998) 0.03
    0.029460195 = product of:
      0.05892039 = sum of:
        0.05892039 = sum of:
          0.023506312 = weight(_text_:research in 2339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.023506312 = score(doc=2339,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1491455 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05227703 = queryNorm
              0.15760657 = fieldWeight in 2339, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2339)
          0.03541408 = weight(_text_:22 in 2339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03541408 = score(doc=2339,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18306525 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05227703 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2339, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2339)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Over the last 4 years, the Information Interaction Laboratory at Rutgers' School of communication, Information and Library Studies has performed a series of investigations concerned with various aspects of people's interactions with advanced information retrieval (IR) systems. We have benn especially concerned with understanding not just what people do, and why, and with what effect, but also with what they would like to do, and how they attempt to accomplish it, and with what difficulties. These investigations have led to some quite interesting conclusions about the nature and structure of people's interactions with information, about support for cooperative human-computer interaction in query reformulation, and about the value of visualization of search results for supporting various forms of interaction with information. In this discussion, I give an overview of the research program and its projects, present representative results from the projects, and discuss some implications of these results for support of subject searching in information retrieval systems
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
  12. Coles, C.: Information seeking behaviour of public library users : use and non-use of electronic media (1999) 0.03
    0.027462807 = product of:
      0.054925613 = sum of:
        0.054925613 = sum of:
          0.026594352 = weight(_text_:research in 286) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.026594352 = score(doc=286,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.1491455 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05227703 = queryNorm
              0.17831147 = fieldWeight in 286, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=286)
          0.028331263 = weight(_text_:22 in 286) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.028331263 = score(doc=286,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18306525 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05227703 = queryNorm
              0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 286, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=286)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This paper highlights some of the significant findings from author's PhD: "Factors affecting the end-use of electronic databases in public libraries." Public libraries have a wide range of different types of users who, unlike academic or special library users, are not necessarily information-trained (see Coles, 1998). Whereas the academic, special library user may have specific information needs that can be met by electronic sources, public library users do not necessarily have such specific information needs that can easily be identified and met. Most user surveys have tended to concentrate on the searching and retrieval aspect of information seeking behaviour, whereas this study's user survey focused more on how people perceived and related to Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs). It was not how people searched a particular electronic source, in this case CD-ROM, that was of prime interest but rather whether or not people actually used them at all and the reasons why people did or did not use electronic media. There were several reasons the study looked at CD-ROM specifically. Firstly, CD-ROM is a well established technology, most people should be familiar with CD-ROM/multimedia. Secondly, CD-ROM was, at the start of the study, the only open access electronic media widely available in public libraries. As well as examining why public library users chose to use electronic sources, the paper looks at the types of CD-ROM databases used both in the library and in general Also examined are what sort of searches users carried out. Where appropriate some of the problems inherent in studying end-users in public libraries and the difficulty in getting reliable data, are discussed. Several methods were used to collect the data. I wished to avoid limiting research to a small sample of library sites, the aim was to be as broad in scope as possible. There were two main groups of people 1 wished to look at: non-users as well as CD-ROM users
    Date
    22. 3.2002 8:51:28
    Source
    Exploring the contexts of information behaviour: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Research in Information Needs, Seeking and Use in Different Contexts, 13-15 August 1998, Sheffield, UK. Ed. by D.K. Wilson u. D.K. Allen
  13. Scholle, U.: Kann ich Ihnen behilflich sein? : Erhebung am zentralen Auskunftsplatz der ULB Münster (2000) 0.02
    0.024789855 = product of:
      0.04957971 = sum of:
        0.04957971 = product of:
          0.09915942 = sum of:
            0.09915942 = weight(_text_:22 in 7585) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09915942 = score(doc=7585,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18306525 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05227703 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 7585, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7585)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2000 17:52:11
  14. Ennis, M.; Sutcliffe, A.G.; Watkinson, S.J.: Towards a predictive model of information seeking : empirical studies of end-user-searching (1999) 0.02
    0.023568155 = product of:
      0.04713631 = sum of:
        0.04713631 = sum of:
          0.018805047 = weight(_text_:research in 296) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.018805047 = score(doc=296,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1491455 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05227703 = queryNorm
              0.12608525 = fieldWeight in 296, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=296)
          0.028331263 = weight(_text_:22 in 296) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.028331263 = score(doc=296,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18306525 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05227703 = queryNorm
              0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 296, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=296)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2002 9:54:13
    Source
    Exploring the contexts of information behaviour: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Research in Information Needs, Seeking and Use in Different Contexts, Sheffield, UK, 1998. Ed. by D.K. Wilson u. D.K. Allen
  15. Griesbaum, J.; Mahrholz, N.; Kiedrowski, K. von Löwe; Rittberger, M.: Knowledge generation in online forums : a case study in the German educational domain (2015) 0.02
    0.023568155 = product of:
      0.04713631 = sum of:
        0.04713631 = sum of:
          0.018805047 = weight(_text_:research in 4440) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.018805047 = score(doc=4440,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1491455 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05227703 = queryNorm
              0.12608525 = fieldWeight in 4440, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4440)
          0.028331263 = weight(_text_:22 in 4440) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.028331263 = score(doc=4440,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18306525 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05227703 = queryNorm
              0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 4440, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4440)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to get a first approximation of the usefulness of online forums with regard to information seeking and knowledge generation. Design/methodology/approach - This study captures the characteristics of knowledge generation by examining the pragmatics and types of information needs of posted questions and by investigating knowledge related characteristics of discussion posts as well as the success of communication. Three online forums were examined. The data set consists of 55 threads, containing 533 posts which were categorized manually by two researchers. Findings - Results show that questioners often ask for personal estimations. Information needs often aim for actionable insights or uncertainty reduction. With regard to answers, factual information is the dominant content type and has the highest knowledge value as it is the strongest predictor with regard to the generation of new knowledge. Opinions are also relevant, but in a rather subsequent and complementary way. Emotional aspects are scarcely observed. Overall, results indicate that knowledge creation predominantly follows a socio-cultural paradigm of knowledge exchange. Research limitations/implications - Although the investigation captures important aspects of knowledge building processes, the measurement of the forums' knowledge value is still rather limited. Success is only partly measurable with the current scheme. The central coding category "new topical knowledge" is only of nominal value and therefore not able to compare different kinds of knowledge gains in the course of discussion. Originality/value - The investigation reaches out beyond studies that do not consider that the role and relevance of posts is dependent on the state of the discussion. Furthermore, the paper integrates two perspectives of knowledge value: the success of the questioner with regard to the expressed information need and the knowledge building value for communicants and readers.
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  16. Yoo, E.-Y.; Robbins, L.S.: Understanding middle-aged women's health information seeking on the web : a theoretical approach (2008) 0.02
    0.021248447 = product of:
      0.042496894 = sum of:
        0.042496894 = product of:
          0.08499379 = sum of:
            0.08499379 = weight(_text_:22 in 2973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08499379 = score(doc=2973,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18306525 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05227703 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2973, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2973)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    9. 2.2008 17:52:22
  17. Hsieh-Yee, I.: Research on Web-search behavior (2001) 0.02
    0.02015246 = product of:
      0.04030492 = sum of:
        0.04030492 = product of:
          0.08060984 = sum of:
            0.08060984 = weight(_text_:research in 2277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08060984 = score(doc=2277,freq=12.0), product of:
                0.1491455 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05227703 = queryNorm
                0.5404779 = fieldWeight in 2277, product of:
                  3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                    12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                  2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2277)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This article reviews studies, conducted between 1995 and 2000, on Web search behavior. These studies reported on children as well as on adults. Most of the studies on children described their interaction with the Web. Research on adult searchers focused on describing search patterns, and many studies investigated effects of selected factors on search behavior, including information organization and presentation, type of search task, Web experience, cognitive abilities, and affective states. What distinguishes the research on adult searchers is the use of multiple data-gathering methods. The research on Web search behavior reflects researchers' commitment to examine users in their information environment and exhibits rigor in design and data analysis. However, many studies lack external validity. Implications of this body of research are discussed.
    Source
    Library and information science research. 23(2001) no.2, S.167-185
  18. Wilson, T.D.: Recent trends in user studies : action research and qualitative methods (2000) 0.02
    0.019945765 = product of:
      0.03989153 = sum of:
        0.03989153 = product of:
          0.07978306 = sum of:
            0.07978306 = weight(_text_:research in 6115) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07978306 = score(doc=6115,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1491455 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05227703 = queryNorm
                0.5349344 = fieldWeight in 6115, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6115)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Information Research. 5(2000) no.3, April 2000
  19. Moore, C.W.: User reactions to online catalogs : an exploratory study (1981) 0.02
    0.018805047 = product of:
      0.037610095 = sum of:
        0.037610095 = product of:
          0.07522019 = sum of:
            0.07522019 = weight(_text_:research in 499) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07522019 = score(doc=499,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1491455 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05227703 = queryNorm
                0.504341 = fieldWeight in 499, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=499)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    College and research libraries. 42(1981) no.4, S.295-302
  20. Fussler, H.H.; Siman, J.L.: Patterns in the use of books in large research libraries (1969) 0.02
    0.018805047 = product of:
      0.037610095 = sum of:
        0.037610095 = product of:
          0.07522019 = sum of:
            0.07522019 = weight(_text_:research in 4490) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07522019 = score(doc=4490,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1491455 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05227703 = queryNorm
                0.504341 = fieldWeight in 4490, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4490)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    

Languages

Types

  • a 249
  • r 6
  • el 5
  • m 2
  • b 1
  • p 1
  • More… Less…