Search (17 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Geschichte der Kataloge"
  1. Panizzi, A.K.C.B.: Passages in my official life (1871) 0.04
    0.035058152 = product of:
      0.070116304 = sum of:
        0.070116304 = product of:
          0.14023261 = sum of:
            0.14023261 = weight(_text_:22 in 935) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14023261 = score(doc=935,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.18306525 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05227703 = queryNorm
                0.76602525 = fieldWeight in 935, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=935)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2007 12:05:26
    22. 7.2007 12:08:24
  2. Zerbst, H.-J.; Kaptein, O.: Gegenwärtiger Stand und Entwicklungstendenzen der Sacherschließung : Auswertung einer Umfrage an deutschen wissenschaftlichen und Öffentlichen Bibliotheken (1993) 0.03
    0.027676595 = product of:
      0.05535319 = sum of:
        0.05535319 = product of:
          0.16605957 = sum of:
            0.16605957 = weight(_text_:3a in 7394) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.16605957 = score(doc=7394,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.44320524 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05227703 = queryNorm
                0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 7394, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=7394)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Ergebnis einer Umfrage aus dem Frühjahr 1993. A. Wissenschaftliche Bibliotheken: Versandt wurde der Fragebogen an die Mitglieder der Sektion IV des DBV. Fragen: (1a) Um welchen Bestand handelt es sich, der sachlich erschlossen wird? (1b) Wie groß ist dieser Bestand? (1c) Wird dieser Bestand vollständig oder nur in Auswahl (einzelne Fächer, Lehrbücher, Dissertationen o.ä.) sachlich erschlossen? (1d) Seit wann bestehen die jetzigen Sachkataloge? (2) Auf welche Art wird der Bestand zur Zeit sachlich erschlossen? (3a) Welche Klassifikation wird angewendet? (3b) Gibt es alphabetisches SyK-Register bzw. einen Zugriff auf die Klassenbeschreibungen? (3c) Gibt es ergänzende Schlüssel für die Aspekte Ort, Zeit, Form? (4) Falls Sie einen SWK führen (a) nach welchem Regelwerk? (b) Gibt es ein genormtes Vokabular oder einen Thesaurus (ggf. nur für bestimmte Fächer)? (5) In welcher Form existieren die Sachkataloge? (6) Ist die Bibliothek an einer kooperativen Sacherschließung, z.B. in einem Verbund beteiligt? [Nein: 79%] (7) Nutzen Sie Fremdleistungen bei der Sacherschließung? [Ja: 46%] (8) Welche sachlichen Suchmöglichkeiten gibt es für Benutzer? (9) Sind zukünftige Veränderungen bei der Sacherschließung geplant? [Ja: 73%]. - B. Öffentliche Bibliotheken: Die Umfrage richtete sich an alle ÖBs der Sektionen I, II und III des DBV. Fragen: (1) Welche Sachkataloge führen Sie? (2) Welche Klassifikationen (Systematiken) liegen dem SyK zugrunde? [ASB: 242; KAB: 333; SfB: 4 (???); SSD: 11; Berliner: 18] (3) Führen Sie ein eigenes Schlagwort-Register zum SyK bzw. zur Klassifikation (Systematik)? (4) Führen Sie den SWK nach ...? [RSWK: 132 (= ca. 60%) anderen Regeln: 93] (5) Seit wann bestehen die jetzigen Sachkataloge? (6) In welcher Form existiern die Sachkataloge? (7) In welchem Umfang wird der Bestand erschlossen? (8) Welche Signaturen verwenden Sie? (9) Ist die Bibliothek an einer kooperativen Sacherschließung, z.B. einem Verbund, beteiligt? [Nein: 96%] (10) Nutzen Sie Fremdleistungen bei der Sacherschließung? [Ja: 70%] (11) Woher beziehen Sie diese Fremdleistungen? (12) Verfügen Sie über ein Online-Katalogsystem mit OPAC? [Ja: 78; Nein: 614] (13) Sind zukünftig Veränderungen bei der Sacherschließung geplant? [Nein: 458; Ja: 237]; RESÜMEE für ÖB: "(i) Einführung von EDV-Katalogen bleibt auch in den 90er Jahren ein Thema, (ii) Der Aufbau von SWK wird in vielen Bibliotheken in Angriff genommen, dabei spielt die Fremddatenübernahme eine entscheidende Rolle, (iii) RSWK werden zunehmend angewandt, Nutzung der SWD auch für andere Regeln wirkt normierend, (iv) Große Bewegung auf dem 'Systematik-Markt' ist in absehbarer Zeit nicht zu erwarten, (v) Für kleinere Bibliotheken wird der Zettelkatalog auf absehbare Zeit noch die herrschende Katalogform sein, (vi) Der erhebliche Nachholbedarf in den neuen Bundesländern wird nur in einem größeren Zeitraum zu leisten sein. ??? SPEZIALBIBIOTHEKEN ???
  3. Thom, I.W.: ¬The divided catalog in college and university libraries (1949) 0.02
    0.018805047 = product of:
      0.037610095 = sum of:
        0.037610095 = product of:
          0.07522019 = sum of:
            0.07522019 = weight(_text_:research in 1572) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07522019 = score(doc=1572,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1491455 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05227703 = queryNorm
                0.504341 = fieldWeight in 1572, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1572)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    College and research libraries. 10(1949) no.3, S.236-241
  4. Radford, W.: Cataloges, codes and bibliographical control (1949) 0.02
    0.018805047 = product of:
      0.037610095 = sum of:
        0.037610095 = product of:
          0.07522019 = sum of:
            0.07522019 = weight(_text_:research in 1837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07522019 = score(doc=1837,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1491455 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05227703 = queryNorm
                0.504341 = fieldWeight in 1837, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1837)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    College and research libraries. 10(1949) no.4, S.395-400;428
  5. Blake, V.L.P.: Forging the Anglo-American Cataloging Alliance : descriptive cataloging, 1830-1908 (2003) 0.02
    0.01770704 = product of:
      0.03541408 = sum of:
        0.03541408 = product of:
          0.07082816 = sum of:
            0.07082816 = weight(_text_:22 in 4056) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07082816 = score(doc=4056,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18306525 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05227703 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4056, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4056)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    S.3-22
  6. Steinhagen, E.N.: Historical perspective of a union catalog in Chile : authorities and periodicals (2003) 0.02
    0.01770704 = product of:
      0.03541408 = sum of:
        0.03541408 = product of:
          0.07082816 = sum of:
            0.07082816 = weight(_text_:22 in 4064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07082816 = score(doc=4064,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18306525 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05227703 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4064, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4064)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    29. 7.2006 20:06:22
  7. Spicher, K.M.: ¬The development of the MARC format (1996) 0.01
    0.014249943 = product of:
      0.028499886 = sum of:
        0.028499886 = product of:
          0.056999773 = sum of:
            0.056999773 = weight(_text_:research in 5574) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.056999773 = score(doc=5574,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.1491455 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05227703 = queryNorm
                0.38217562 = fieldWeight in 5574, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5574)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The use of computerized cataloguing data requires a commitment on the part of libraries to the standardization of data elements and record formats. Early computerized formats were initiated by several research libraries to serve the needs of particular university systems. In developing MARC, the LoC drew on the experiences of these libraries in establishing a standard acceptable to the research library community for the interchange of bibliographic data. Discusses early computerized formats influencing MARC, the origins of the MARC Pilot Project, and design factors influencing the evolution of the format through MARC2. Research was based on primary sources documenting the early history of MARC, including unpublished documents in the LoC archives
  8. Eversberg, B.: ADV und Zetteldruck : ein Widerspruch? (1975) 0.01
    0.0141656315 = product of:
      0.028331263 = sum of:
        0.028331263 = product of:
          0.056662526 = sum of:
            0.056662526 = weight(_text_:22 in 4431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.056662526 = score(doc=4431,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18306525 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05227703 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4431, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4431)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Zeitschrift für Bibliothekswesen und Bibliographie. 22(1975) H.5, S.387-390
  9. Blake, V.L.P.: Forging the Anglo-American cataloging alliance : descriptive cataloging, 1830-1908 (2002) 0.01
    0.012394927 = product of:
      0.024789855 = sum of:
        0.024789855 = product of:
          0.04957971 = sum of:
            0.04957971 = weight(_text_:22 in 5479) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04957971 = score(doc=5479,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18306525 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05227703 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5479, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5479)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 35(2002) nos.1/2, S.3-22
  10. Hauff, M.: Gimme back the card catalog (1996) 0.01
    0.009402524 = product of:
      0.018805047 = sum of:
        0.018805047 = product of:
          0.037610095 = sum of:
            0.037610095 = weight(_text_:research in 500) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037610095 = score(doc=500,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1491455 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05227703 = queryNorm
                0.2521705 = fieldWeight in 500, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=500)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Computer catalogues are far less easy to use than card catalogues and that their increasing sophistication takes them further away from the casual user, making successful catalogue use and library research an elitist skill. Describes a number of ways in which computer catalogues can be frustrating to use, both physically and intellectually, and suggests that card catalogues be retained alongside the automated version
  11. Pettee, J.: ¬The subject approach to books and the development of the dictionary catalog (1985) 0.01
    0.0070828157 = product of:
      0.0141656315 = sum of:
        0.0141656315 = product of:
          0.028331263 = sum of:
            0.028331263 = weight(_text_:22 in 3624) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028331263 = score(doc=3624,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18306525 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05227703 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 3624, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3624)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Original in: Pettee, J.: The history and theory of the alphabetical subject approach to books. New York: Wilson 1946. S.22-25.
  12. Smiraglia, R.P.: ¬The history of "The Work" in the modern catalog (2003) 0.01
    0.005876578 = product of:
      0.011753156 = sum of:
        0.011753156 = product of:
          0.023506312 = sum of:
            0.023506312 = weight(_text_:research in 5631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023506312 = score(doc=5631,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1491455 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05227703 = queryNorm
                0.15760657 = fieldWeight in 5631, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5631)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    From a historical perspective, one could consider the modern library catalog to be that bibliographical apparatus that stretches at least from Thomas Hyde's catalog for the Bodleian Library at Oxford to the near present. Mai and other recent authors have suggested postmodern approaches to knowledge organization. In these, we realize that there is no single and unique order of knowledge or documents but rather there are many appropriate orders, all of them contextually dependent. Works (oeuvres, opera, Werke, etc.), as are musical works, literary works, works of art, etc., are and always have been key entities for information retrieval. Yet catalogs in the modern era were designed to inventory (first) and retrieve (second) specific documents. From Hyde's catalog for the Bodleian until the late twentieth century, developments are epistemologically pragmatic--reflected in the structure of catalog records, in the rules for main entry headings, and in the rules for filing in card catalogs. After 1980 developments become empirical-reflected in research conducted by Tillett, Yee, Smiraglia, Leazer, Carlyle, and Vellucci. The influence of empiricism on the pragmatic notion of "the work" has led to increased focus on the concept of the work. The challenge for the postmodern online catalog is to fully embrace the concept of "the work," finally to facilitate it as a prime objective for information retrieval.
  13. Smiraglia, R.P.: ¬The history of "The Work" in the modern catalog (2003) 0.01
    0.005876578 = product of:
      0.011753156 = sum of:
        0.011753156 = product of:
          0.023506312 = sum of:
            0.023506312 = weight(_text_:research in 5652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023506312 = score(doc=5652,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1491455 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05227703 = queryNorm
                0.15760657 = fieldWeight in 5652, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5652)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    From a historical perspective, one could consider the modern library catalog to be that bibliographical apparatus that stretches at least from Thomas Hyde's catalog for the Bodleian Library at Oxford to the near present. Mai and other recent authors have suggested postmodern approaches to knowledge organization. In these, we realize that there is no single and unique order of knowledge or documents but rather there are many appropriate orders, all of them contextually dependent. Works (oeuvres, opera, Werke, etc.), as are musical works, literary works, works of art, etc., are and always have been key entities for information retrieval. Yet catalogs in the modern era were designed to inventory (first) and retrieve (second) specific documents. From Hyde's catalog for the Bodleian until the late twentieth century, developments are epistemologically pragmatic--reflected in the structure of catalog records, in the rules for main entry headings, and in the rules for filing in card catalogs. After 1980 developments become empirical-reflected in research conducted by Tillett, Yee, Smiraglia, Leazer, Carlyle, and Vellucci. The influence of empiricism on the pragmatic notion of "the work" has led to increased focus on the concept of the work. The challenge for the postmodern online catalog is to fully embrace the concept of "the work," finally to facilitate it as a prime objective for information retrieval.
  14. Krajewski, M.: Paper machines : about cards & catalogs, 1548-1929 (2011) 0.01
    0.005876578 = product of:
      0.011753156 = sum of:
        0.011753156 = product of:
          0.023506312 = sum of:
            0.023506312 = weight(_text_:research in 735) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023506312 = score(doc=735,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1491455 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05227703 = queryNorm
                0.15760657 = fieldWeight in 735, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=735)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    "Krajewski draws on recent German media theory and on a rich array of European and American sources in this thought-provoking account of the index card as a tool of information management. In investigating the road from the slips of paper of the 16th century to the data processing of the 20th, Krajewski highlights its twists and turns--failures and unintended consequences, reinventions, and surprising transfers."--Ann M. Blair, Henry Charles Lea Professor of History, Harvard University, and author of Too Much to Know: Managing Scholarly Information before the Modern Age -- Ann Blair "This is a fascinating, original, continuously surprising, and meticulously researched study of the long history of the emergence of card systems for organizing not only libraries but business activities in Europe and the United States. It is particularly important for English language readers due to its European perspective and the extraordinary range of German and other resources on which it draws." --W. Boyd Rayward, Professor Emeritus, Graduate School of Library and Information Science, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign -- W. Boyd Rayward "Markus Krajewski has done the history of cataloguing and the history of information management a considerable service: I recommend it highly." -- Professor Tom Wilson, Editor-in-Chief, Information Research
  15. Lubetzky, S.: Principles of cataloging (2001) 0.01
    0.005876578 = product of:
      0.011753156 = sum of:
        0.011753156 = product of:
          0.023506312 = sum of:
            0.023506312 = weight(_text_:research in 2627) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023506312 = score(doc=2627,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1491455 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05227703 = queryNorm
                0.15760657 = fieldWeight in 2627, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2627)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Imprint
    Los Angeles : California Univ., Inst. of Library Research
  16. Understanding FRBR : what it is and how it will affect our retrieval tools (2007) 0.00
    0.004986441 = product of:
      0.009972882 = sum of:
        0.009972882 = product of:
          0.019945765 = sum of:
            0.019945765 = weight(_text_:research in 1675) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.019945765 = score(doc=1675,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1491455 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05227703 = queryNorm
                0.1337336 = fieldWeight in 1675, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1675)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    1. An Introduction to Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) - Arlene G. Taylor (1-20) 2. An Introduction to Functional Requirements for Authority Data (FRAD) - Glenn E. Patton (21-28) 3. Understanding the Relationship between FRBR and FRAD - Glenn E. Patton (29-34) 4. FRBR and the History of Cataloging - William Denton (35-58) 5. The Impact of Research on the Development of FRBR - Edward T. O'Neill (59-72) 6. Bibliographic Families and Superworks - Richard P. Smiraglia (73-86) 7. FRBR and RDA (Resource Description and Access) - Barbara B. Tillett (87-96) 8. FRBR and Archival Materials - Alexander C. Thurman (97-102) 9. FRBR and Works of Art, Architecture, and Material Culture - Murtha Baca and Sherman Clarke (103-110) 10. FRBR and Cartographic Materials - Mary Lynette Larsgaard (111-116) 11. FRBR and Moving Image Materials - Martha M. Yee (117-130) 12. FRBR and Music - Sherry L. Vellucci (131-152) 13. FRBR and Serials - Steven C. Shadle (153-174)
    Footnote
    Resonanz: "Arlene Taylor and her compadres don't even try to teach you how to construct a hierarchical record. Instead, they direct their efforts toward showcasing what's possible when digital technology and traditional cataloging practice meet. This is the future of cataloging." - Library Media Connection "The emergence of this textbook is testimony to the breadth and depth of work done to date. It documents much of that work, and provides a good basic introduction to FRBR that is broadly understandable... The relational concepts within FRBR are complicated and can be challenging. This book does a good job of illuminating them in a straightforward manner. It also describes how the application of the FRBR concepts could improve our systems of bibliographic access in very specific ways... For those of us that really want or need to be able to predict the impact that FRBR will have on our work, this is an accessible explanation of the current state of the art. As such it is a real contribution to our understanding." - TechKNOW "Understanding FRBR... features chapters contributed by leading authorities in the cataloging field... It offers a basic introduction to FRBR, discussions about FRBR, FRAD (functional requirements for authority data), and RDA (resource description and access), and the issues involved in using FRBR in nontraditional library settings such as with cartographic materials and music. Both books are well illustrated and include numerous bibliographical resources.' [Reviewed in conjuntion with FRBR: A Guide for the Perplexed]." - Library Journal "Taylor and her contributors cover FRBR and introduce the reader to FRAD as well... All chapters conclude with current and useful references to further reading and more information." - Booklist "Understanding FRBR is clearly written, well illustrated (many of the concepts are clarified by very helpful diagrams), and well indexed; additionally, chapters feature extensive bibliographies, many of which provide URLs to the IFLA groups' documents. While it may seem that this book is of interest only to catalogers, the application of FRBR will change the structure of catalog and the systems used to store and display it; therefore, it is an important text for systems librarians, reference librarians, and anybody else interested in the future of the organization and display of bibliographic information." - College & Research Libraries "Understanding FRBR is a useful and timely book that brings together recent developments in FRBR and offers several assessments of it." - Technicalities "No cataloguer, bibliographic systems designer or library and information science lecturers and students should be without this book. It is a useful resource in acquiring an understanding of what FRBR is about and how it will change the way in which cataloguers will think about cataloguing in future." - The Electronic Library
  17. Laaff, M.: Googles genialer Urahn (2011) 0.00
    0.00442676 = product of:
      0.00885352 = sum of:
        0.00885352 = product of:
          0.01770704 = sum of:
            0.01770704 = weight(_text_:22 in 4610) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.01770704 = score(doc=4610,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18306525 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05227703 = queryNorm
                0.09672529 = fieldWeight in 4610, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=4610)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    24.10.2008 14:19:22