Search (35 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Suchtaktik"
  1. Xu, Y.: ¬The dynamics of interactive information retrieval behavior : part I: an activity theory perspective (2007) 0.03
    0.03219682 = product of:
      0.09659045 = sum of:
        0.08034424 = weight(_text_:states in 331) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08034424 = score(doc=331,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22009853 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039970156 = queryNorm
            0.3650376 = fieldWeight in 331, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=331)
        0.016246213 = product of:
          0.032492425 = sum of:
            0.032492425 = weight(_text_:22 in 331) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032492425 = score(doc=331,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13996868 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.039970156 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 331, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=331)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Human information-seeking behavior is a topic of increasing interest in many disciplines. However, the dynamics of this behavior remain elusive. The extant research has taken cognitive and behavioral perspectives to study information-seeking behavior, and observed its dynamics in multiple sessions. However, the underlying mechanisms that govern the dynamics of information-seeking behavior are not well understood. With a focus on interactive information retrieval behavior, this study proposes an integrated framework based on activity theory. This framework is not only comprehensive and integrated, but also offers an explanation of the mechanisms governing the interaction between users' cognitive states and their manifested behavior when using an information retrieval system. A set of four propositions are advanced to describe the mechanisms. The implications are discussed.
    Date
    27. 5.2007 13:55:22
  2. Hsieh-Yee, I.: Research on Web-search behavior (2001) 0.02
    0.015622491 = product of:
      0.09373494 = sum of:
        0.09373494 = weight(_text_:states in 2277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09373494 = score(doc=2277,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22009853 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039970156 = queryNorm
            0.42587718 = fieldWeight in 2277, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2277)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    This article reviews studies, conducted between 1995 and 2000, on Web search behavior. These studies reported on children as well as on adults. Most of the studies on children described their interaction with the Web. Research on adult searchers focused on describing search patterns, and many studies investigated effects of selected factors on search behavior, including information organization and presentation, type of search task, Web experience, cognitive abilities, and affective states. What distinguishes the research on adult searchers is the use of multiple data-gathering methods. The research on Web search behavior reflects researchers' commitment to examine users in their information environment and exhibits rigor in design and data analysis. However, many studies lack external validity. Implications of this body of research are discussed.
  3. Xu, Y.; Liu, C.: ¬The dynamics of interactive information retrieval : part II: an empirical study from the activity theory perspective (2007) 0.01
    0.013390707 = product of:
      0.08034424 = sum of:
        0.08034424 = weight(_text_:states in 333) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08034424 = score(doc=333,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22009853 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039970156 = queryNorm
            0.3650376 = fieldWeight in 333, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=333)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Human information-seeking behavior is complicated. Activity theory is a powerful theoretical instrument to untangle the "complications." Based on activity theory, a comprehensive framework is proposed in Part I (Y. Xu, 2007) of this report to describe interactive information retrieval (IIR) behavior. A set of propositions is also proposed to describe the mechanisms governing users' cognitive activity and the interaction between users' cognitive states and manifested retrieval behavior. An empirical study is carried out to verify the propositions. The authors' experimental simulation of 81 participants in one search session indicates the propositions are largely supported. Their findings indicate IIR behavior is planned. Users adopt a divide-and-conquer strategy in information retrieval. The planning of information retrieval activity is also partially manifested in query revision tactics. Users learn from previously read documents. A user's interaction with a system ultimately changes the user's information need and the resulting relevance judgment, but the dynamics of topicality perception and novelty perception occur at different paces.
  4. Kuhlthau, C.C.: Information search process (ISP) model (2009) 0.01
    0.013390707 = product of:
      0.08034424 = sum of:
        0.08034424 = weight(_text_:states in 3819) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08034424 = score(doc=3819,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22009853 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039970156 = queryNorm
            0.3650376 = fieldWeight in 3819, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3819)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    The information search process (ISP) is a six-stage model of the users' holistic experience in the process of information seeking. The ISP model, based on two decades of empirical research, identifies three realms of experience: the affective (feelings), the cognitive (thoughts), and the physical (actions) common to each stage. These studies were among the first to investigate the affective aspects or the feelings of a person in the process of information seeking along with the cognitive and physical aspects. Central to the ISP is the notion that uncertainty, both affective and cognitive, increases and decreases in the process of information seeking. A principle of uncertainty for information seeking is proposed that states that information commonly increases uncertainty in the early stages of the search process. Increased uncertainty indicates a zone of intervention for intermediaries and system designers.
  5. Still, J.: ¬The anthroplogy of online search strategy formation : a study of four countires (1996) 0.01
    0.011582514 = product of:
      0.06949508 = sum of:
        0.06949508 = weight(_text_:united in 4954) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06949508 = score(doc=4954,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22423708 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039970156 = queryNorm
            0.30991787 = fieldWeight in 4954, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4954)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Discusses the results of a survey sent to online searchers in the United Kingdom, USA, Australia and Canada. The purpose of the study was to investigate the influence of national culture on information retrieval skills. The survey form provided a sample question and asked searchers to prepare a preliminary strategy for a search on the Sociological Abstracts online database. Cultural patterns to online searching were discerned. American searchers were found to depend on controlled vocabulary much more than British searchers. Australian searchers seemed to have created a search style of their own, while Canadian searchers blended the American and British patterns. In reviewing results of the searches, over half of the citations retrieved were retrieved by more than one search. Australian searchers were more likely to retrieve items that no other search retrieved, while Canadian searchers had the highest overlap rate. If the theory that citations retrieved by the most searches are the most relevant is correct, then the Canadian searchers prepare the best searches. The Canadian searchers also seemed to be the most international, as their search results overlapped with those from the other 3 countires more often than did searches from other countries. One question contained in the survey asked searchers to suggest related databases for their searches. PAIS and SSCI were the databases mentioned most often in all 4 countires. Nevertheless, cultural differences and ethnocriticism could be discerned in the results with searchers listing databases specifically relating to their own countries or regions: Australian PAIS and US Political Science Abstracts being 2 examples
  6. Ross, C.S.: Finding without seeking : what readers say about the role of pleasure-reading as a source of information (1999) 0.01
    0.011520698 = product of:
      0.069124185 = sum of:
        0.069124185 = product of:
          0.13824837 = sum of:
            0.13824837 = weight(_text_:biography in 193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.13824837 = score(doc=193,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.31627175 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.912698 = idf(docFreq=43, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.039970156 = queryNorm
                0.43711895 = fieldWeight in 193, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  7.912698 = idf(docFreq=43, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=193)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    It is common to distinguish sharply between leisure reading undertaken purely for pleasure and utilitarian reading that satisfies what Peter Mann (1969, 53-61) has called `extrinsic' interests: reference materials for work and home such as medical books, cook books and repair manuals. We might suppose that information-seeking is concerned only with utilitarian reading. However, once we adopt a definition of information as something that fills in a gap in understanding or makes a difference to an individual's cognitive structure or helps people with their lives, it follows that we cannot deduce uses simply by looking at the texts themselves. Since meanings are constructed by readers, we must ask the readers about the uses they make of texts in the context of their lives. Findings from a research project focussed on 194 readers who read for pleasure indicate that for a broad understanding of the information behaviour of ordinary people, we need to think beyond reference books to include extended narrative forms, particularly biography, history, and fiction. People who are avid readers for pleasure report that during the course of wide reading they serendipitously encounter information that helps them in their lives
  7. Dennis, S.; Bruza, P.; McArthur, R.: Web searching : a process-oriented experimental study of three interactive search paradigms (2002) 0.01
    0.011158923 = product of:
      0.06695353 = sum of:
        0.06695353 = weight(_text_:states in 200) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06695353 = score(doc=200,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22009853 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039970156 = queryNorm
            0.304198 = fieldWeight in 200, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=200)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    This article compares search effectiveness when using query-based Internet search (via the Google search engine), directory-based search (via Yahoo), and phrase-based query reformulation-assisted search (via the Hyperindex browser) by means of a controlled, user-based experimental study. The focus was to evaluate aspects of the search process. Cognitive load was measured using a secondary digit-monitoring task to quantify the effort of the user in various search states; independent relevance judgements were employed to gauge the quality of the documents accessed during the search process and time was monitored as a function of search state. Results indicated directory-based search does not offer increased relevance over the query-based search (with or without query formulation assistance), and also takes longer. Query reformulation does significantly improve the relevance of the documents through which the user must trawl, particularly when the formulation of query terms is more difficult. However, the improvement in document relevance comes at the cost of increased search time, although this difference is quite small when the search is self-terminated. In addition, the advantage of the query reformulation seems to occur as a consequence of providing more discriminating terms rather than by increasing the length of queries
  8. Spink, A.: Towards a theoretical framework for information retrieval in an information seeking context (1999) 0.01
    0.011158923 = product of:
      0.06695353 = sum of:
        0.06695353 = weight(_text_:states in 300) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06695353 = score(doc=300,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22009853 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039970156 = queryNorm
            0.304198 = fieldWeight in 300, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=300)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    This paper presents the initial stages of the development of a three-dimensional model as a theoretical framework for conceptualizing and exploring interactive information retrieval (IR) with an information seeking context. The model, displayed in Figure 1, includes a Plane of Judgment within a Plane of Interaction within a Plane of Time. The Plane of Judgment includes levels and regions of relevance judgments, and other user judgments during interactive IR, e.g., magnitude or strategy feedback, tactics, search strategies, or search terms. The Plane of Judgment exists within a Plane of Interaction. The Plane of Interaction consists of interactive IR models, including Ingwersen (1992, 1996), Belkin, Cool, Stein and Theil (1995), and Saracevic (1996b, 1997). The Plane of Interaction includes movement or shifts within interactions or search episodes, e.g., tactics, information problem, strategies, terms, feedback, goal states, or uncertainty. IR interactions that occur within a Plane of Interaction exist within a Plane of Time. The Plane of Time includes users' information seeking stages, represented in the model by Kuhlthau's Information Search Process Model (1993) and users' successive searches over time related to the same or evolving information problem (Spink, 1996). The three-dimensional model is a framework for the development of theoretical and empirical research to: 1. Integrate interactive IR research within information-seeking context 2. Explore users' interactive IR episodes within their changing information-seeking contexts 3. Examine relevance judgments within users' information seeking processes 4. Broaden relevance research to include the concurrent exploration of relevance judgment level, region and time
  9. Kuhlthau, C.C.: Investigating patterns in information seeking : concepts in context (1999) 0.01
    0.011158923 = product of:
      0.06695353 = sum of:
        0.06695353 = weight(_text_:states in 301) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06695353 = score(doc=301,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22009853 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039970156 = queryNorm
            0.304198 = fieldWeight in 301, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=301)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    This paper presents the initial stages of the development of a three-dimensional model as a theoretical framework for conceptualizing and exploring interactive information retrieval (IR) with an information seeking context. The model, displayed in Figure 1, includes a Plane of Judgment within a Plane of Interaction within a Plane of Time. The Plane of Judgment includes levels and regions of relevance judgments, and other user judgments during interactive IR, e.g., magnitude or strategy feedback, tactics, search strategies, or search terms. The Plane of Judgment exists within a Plane of Interaction. The Plane of Interaction consists of interactive IR models, including Ingwersen (1992, 1996), Belkin, Cool, Stein and Theil (1995), and Saracevic (1996b, 1997). The Plane of Interaction includes movement or shifts within interactions or search episodes, e.g., tactics, information problem, strategies, terms, feedback, goal states, or uncertainty. IR interactions that occur within a Plane of Interaction exist within a Plane of Time. The Plane of Time includes users' information seeking stages, represented in the model by Kuhlthau's Information Search Process Model (1993) and users' successive searches over time related to the same or evolving information problem (Spink, 1996). The three-dimensional model is a framework for the development of theoretical and empirical research to: 1. Integrate interactive IR research within information-seeking context 2. Explore users' interactive IR episodes within their changing information-seeking contexts 3. Examine relevance judgments within users' information seeking processes 4. Broaden relevance research to include the concurrent exploration of relevance judgment level, region and time
  10. Morse, P.M.: Search theory and browsing (1970) 0.01
    0.0072205393 = product of:
      0.043323234 = sum of:
        0.043323234 = product of:
          0.08664647 = sum of:
            0.08664647 = weight(_text_:22 in 1448) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08664647 = score(doc=1448,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13996868 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.039970156 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 1448, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1448)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    22. 5.2005 19:53:09
  11. Case, D.O.: Looking for information : a survey on research on information seeking, needs, and behavior (2002) 0.01
    0.0066953534 = product of:
      0.04017212 = sum of:
        0.04017212 = weight(_text_:states in 1270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04017212 = score(doc=1270,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22009853 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039970156 = queryNorm
            0.1825188 = fieldWeight in 1270, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1270)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: JASIST 54(2003) no.7, S.695-697 (R. Savolainen): "Donald O. Case has written an ambitious book to create an overall picture of the major approaches to information needs and seeking (INS) studies. The aim to write an extensive review is reflected in the list of references containing about 700 items. The high ambitions are explained an p. 14, where Case states that he is aiming at a multidisciplinary understanding of the concept of information seeking. In the Preface, the author characterizes his book as an introduction to the topic for students at the graduate level, as well as as a review and handbook for scholars engagged in information behavior research. In my view, Looking for Information is particularly welcome as an academic textbook because the field of INS studies suffers from the lack of monographs. Along with the continuous growth of the number of journal articles and conference papers, there is a genuine need for a book that picks up the numerous pieces and puts them together. The use of the study as a textbook is facilitated by clearly delineated sections an major themes and the wealth of concrete examples of information seeking in everyday contexts. The book is lucidly written and it is accessible to novice readers, too. At first glance, the idea of providing a comprehensive review of INS studies may seem a mission impossible because the current number of articles, papers, and other contributions in this field is nearing the 10,000 range (p. 224). Donald Case is not alone in the task of coming to grips with an increasing number of studies; similar problems have been faced by those writing INS-related chapters for the Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (ARIST). Case has solved the problem of "too many publications to be reviewed" by concentrating an the INS literature published during the last two decades. Secondly, studies an library use and information retrieval are discussed only to a limited extent. In addition, Case is highly selective as to studies focusing an the use of specific sources and channels such as WWW. These delineations are reasonable, even though they beg some questions. First, how should one draw the line between studies an information seeking and information retrieval? Case does not discuss this question in greater detail, although in recent years, the overlapping areas of information seeking and retrieval studies have been broadened, along with the growing importance of WWW in information seeking/retrieval. Secondly, how can one define the concept of information searching (or, more specifically, Internet or Web searching) in relation to information seeking and information retrieval? In the field of Web searching studies, there is an increasing number of contributions that are of direct relevance to information-seeking studies. Clearly, the advent of the Internet, particularly, the Web, has blurred the previous lines between INS and IR literature, making them less clear cut. The book consists of five main sections, and comprises 13 chapters. There is an Appendix serving the needs of an INS textbook (questions for discussion and application). The structure of the book is meticulously planned and, as a whole, it offers a sufficiently balanced contribution to theoretical, methodological, and empirical issues of INS. The title, Looking for Information: A Survey of Research an Information Seeking, Needs, and Behavior aptly describes the main substance of the book. . . . It is easy to agree with Case about the significance of the problem of specialization and fragmentation. This problem seems to be concomitant with the broadening field of INS research. In itself, Case's book can be interpreted as a struggle against this fragmentation. His book suggests that this struggle is not hopeless and that it is still possible to draw an overall picture of the evolving research field. The major pieces of the puzzle were found and the book will provide a useful overview of INS studies for many years."
  12. Morse, P.M.: Browsing and search theory (1973) 0.01
    0.006317972 = product of:
      0.03790783 = sum of:
        0.03790783 = product of:
          0.07581566 = sum of:
            0.07581566 = weight(_text_:22 in 3339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07581566 = score(doc=3339,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13996868 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.039970156 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3339, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3339)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    22. 5.2005 19:52:29
  13. Branch, J.L.: Investigating the information-seeking process of adolescents : the value of using think alouds and think afters (2000) 0.01
    0.006317972 = product of:
      0.03790783 = sum of:
        0.03790783 = product of:
          0.07581566 = sum of:
            0.07581566 = weight(_text_:22 in 3924) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07581566 = score(doc=3924,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13996868 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.039970156 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3924, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3924)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Library and information science research. 22(2000) no.4, S.371-382
  14. Pejtersen, A.M.: Design of a classification scheme for fiction based on an analysis of actual user-librarian communication, and use of the scheme for control of librarians' search strategies (1980) 0.00
    0.004512837 = product of:
      0.027077023 = sum of:
        0.027077023 = product of:
          0.054154046 = sum of:
            0.054154046 = weight(_text_:22 in 5835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054154046 = score(doc=5835,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13996868 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.039970156 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5835, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5835)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    5. 8.2006 13:22:44
  15. Hsieh-Yee, I.: Search tactics of Web users in searching for texts, graphics, known items and subjects : a search simulation study (1998) 0.00
    0.002707702 = product of:
      0.016246213 = sum of:
        0.016246213 = product of:
          0.032492425 = sum of:
            0.032492425 = weight(_text_:22 in 2404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032492425 = score(doc=2404,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13996868 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.039970156 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2404, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2404)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    25.12.1998 19:22:31
  16. Limberg, L.: Three conceptions of information seeking and use (1999) 0.00
    0.002707702 = product of:
      0.016246213 = sum of:
        0.016246213 = product of:
          0.032492425 = sum of:
            0.032492425 = weight(_text_:22 in 281) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032492425 = score(doc=281,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13996868 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.039970156 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 281, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=281)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2002 9:53:10
  17. Lin, S.-j.; Belkin, N.: Validation of a model of information seeking over multiple search sessions (2005) 0.00
    0.002707702 = product of:
      0.016246213 = sum of:
        0.016246213 = product of:
          0.032492425 = sum of:
            0.032492425 = weight(_text_:22 in 3450) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032492425 = score(doc=3450,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13996868 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.039970156 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3450, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3450)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    10. 4.2005 14:52:22
  18. Koopmans, N.I.: What's your question? : The need for research information from the perspective of different user groups (2002) 0.00
    0.002707702 = product of:
      0.016246213 = sum of:
        0.016246213 = product of:
          0.032492425 = sum of:
            0.032492425 = weight(_text_:22 in 3612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032492425 = score(doc=3612,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13996868 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.039970156 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3612, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3612)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    2. 7.2005 12:22:50
  19. Crestani, F.; Du, H.: Written versus spoken queries : a qualitative and quantitative comparative analysis (2006) 0.00
    0.002707702 = product of:
      0.016246213 = sum of:
        0.016246213 = product of:
          0.032492425 = sum of:
            0.032492425 = weight(_text_:22 in 5047) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032492425 = score(doc=5047,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13996868 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.039970156 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5047, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5047)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    5. 6.2006 11:22:23
  20. Lee, S.-S.; Theng, Y.-L.; Goh, D.H.-L.: Creative information seeking : part II: empirical verification (2007) 0.00
    0.002707702 = product of:
      0.016246213 = sum of:
        0.016246213 = product of:
          0.032492425 = sum of:
            0.032492425 = weight(_text_:22 in 813) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032492425 = score(doc=813,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13996868 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.039970156 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 813, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=813)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    23.12.2007 12:22:16