Search (25 results, page 1 of 2)

Z39.67-1993: Computer software description (1993) 0.05

0.050453156 = product of:
  0.20181262 = sum of:
    0.20181262 = weight(_text_:description in 8732) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.20181262 = score(doc=8732,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.23150103 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04979191 = queryNorm
        0.8717569 = fieldWeight in 8732, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=8732)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract: Computer software can sometimes defy description! Z39.67 gives guidelines for unequivocally describing software in advertising, on the packaging and carrier and labels and on title screens

Resource Description and Access : RDA : developed in a collaborative process led by the Joint Steering Committee for Development of RDA (2013) 0.05

0.045155756 = product of:
  0.09031151 = sum of:
    0.071351536 = weight(_text_:description in 898) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.071351536 = score(doc=898,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23150103 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04979191 = queryNorm
        0.3082126 = fieldWeight in 898, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=898)
    0.018959979 = product of:
      0.037919957 = sum of:
        0.037919957 = weight(_text_:access in 898) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037919957 = score(doc=898,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.22468945 = fieldWeight in 898, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=898)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Fachkollegium der Arbeitsgruppe RNA/RDA derBibliotheken, Archive und Museen in Deutschland, Österreich und der Schweiz: Ressourcenerschließung mit Normdaten in Archiven und Bibliotheken (RNAB) für Personen-, Familien-, Körperschaftsarchive und Sammlungen : Richtlinie und Regeln (2019) 0.04
```
0.037629798 = product of:
  0.075259596 = sum of:
    0.05945961 = weight(_text_:description in 5259) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05945961 = score(doc=5259,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23150103 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04979191 = queryNorm
        0.25684384 = fieldWeight in 5259, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5259)
    0.015799982 = product of:
      0.031599965 = sum of:
        0.031599965 = weight(_text_:access in 5259) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031599965 = score(doc=5259,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.18724121 = fieldWeight in 5259, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5259)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
```
Abstract

Das neue Regelwerk RNAB wurde seit 2014 im Rahmen einer Sonderarbeitsgruppe des Standardisierungsausschusses unter der Leitung eines Redaktionsteams aus der Österreichischen und Schweizerischen Nationalbibliothek sowie der Staatsbibliothek zu Berlin ausgearbeitet. Dieser Arbeitsgruppe gehören Fachkolleginnen und Fachkollegen aus Bibliotheken, Archiven und Museen in Deutschland, Österreich und der Schweiz an. Ziel war es, das bestehende Regelwerk RNA praxisnah und kompatibel mit neu eingeführten Standards weiterzuentwickeln. Notwendig wurde die Überarbeitung durch die Einführung des bibliothekarischen Regelwerks Resource Description and Access (RDA) im internationalen Raum und Neuentwicklungen bei den Grundlagenmodellen IFLA Library Reference Model (IFLA LRM) und Records in Contexts (RiC). Die RNAB soll auch für nicht bibliothekarisch oder archivarisch ausgebildete Bearbeitende von Beständen eine leicht verständliche Anleitung sein. Sie erläutert den Umgang mit diesen Beständen und deren nachnutzbare und nachnutzende Verzeichnung unter Zuhilfenahme von Normdaten und kontrolliertem Vokabular.

Guidelines for bibliographic description of interactive multimedia (1994) 0.04

0.035675768 = product of:
  0.14270307 = sum of:
    0.14270307 = weight(_text_:description in 2975) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14270307 = score(doc=2975,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23150103 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04979191 = queryNorm
        0.6164252 = fieldWeight in 2975, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2975)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

ISAD(G): General International Standard Archival Description : adopted by the Ad Hoc Commission on Descriptive Standards, Sweden, 21-23 January (1994) 0.04

0.035675768 = product of:
  0.14270307 = sum of:
    0.14270307 = weight(_text_:description in 5023) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14270307 = score(doc=5023,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23150103 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04979191 = queryNorm
        0.6164252 = fieldWeight in 5023, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5023)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Agnese Galeffi, A.; Bertolini, M.V.; Bothmann, R.L.; Rodríguez, E.E.; McGarry, D.: Statement of International Cataloguing Principles (ICP) 2016 (2016) 0.03
```
0.032721665 = product of:
  0.06544333 = sum of:
    0.04756769 = weight(_text_:description in 3284) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04756769 = score(doc=3284,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23150103 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04979191 = queryNorm
        0.20547508 = fieldWeight in 3284, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3284)
    0.01787564 = product of:
      0.03575128 = sum of:
        0.03575128 = weight(_text_:access in 3284) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03575128 = score(doc=3284,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.21183924 = fieldWeight in 3284, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3284)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
```
Abstract

The original Statement of Principles - commonly known as the "Paris Principles" - was approved by the International Conference on Cataloguing Principles in 1961. Its goal of serving as a basis for international standardization in cataloguing has certainly been achieved: most of the cataloguing codes that were developed worldwide since that time have followed the Principles strictly or at least to a high degree. More than fifty years later, having a common set of international cataloguing principles is still necessary as cataloguers and users around the world use online catalogues as search and discovery systems. At the beginning of the 21st century, IFLA produced a new statement of principles (published in 2009) applicable to online library catalogues and beyond. The current version has been reviewed and updated in 2014 and 2015, and approved in 2016. The 2009 Statement of Principles replaced and explicitly broadened the scope of the Paris Principles from just textual resources to all types of resources, and from just the choice and form of entry to all aspects of bibliographic and authority data used in library catalogues. It included not only principles and objectives, but also guiding rules that should be included in cataloguing codes internationally, as well as guidance on search and retrieval capabilities. This 2016 edition takes into consideration new categories of users, the open access environment, the interoperability and the accessibility of data, features of discovery tools and the significant change of user behaviour in general. This statement builds on the great cataloguing traditions of the world, as well as on the conceptual models in the IFLA Functional Requirements family.

Content

This statement covers: - Scope - General Principles - Entities, Attributes, and Relationships - Bibliographic Description - Access Points - Objectives and Functions of the Catalogue - Foundations for Search Capabilities Vgl. auch: http://www.ifla.org/publications/node/11015.

¬The Dublin Core Metadata Element Set (2007) 0.03

0.029729806 = product of:
  0.11891922 = sum of:
    0.11891922 = weight(_text_:description in 3395) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11891922 = score(doc=3395,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23150103 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04979191 = queryNorm
        0.5136877 = fieldWeight in 3395, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3395)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract: Defines fifteen metadata elements for resource description in a cross-disciplinary information environment

¬The Dublin Core Metadata Element Set (2012) 0.03

0.029729806 = product of:
  0.11891922 = sum of:
    0.11891922 = weight(_text_:description in 4790) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11891922 = score(doc=4790,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23150103 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04979191 = queryNorm
        0.5136877 = fieldWeight in 4790, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4790)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract: Defines fifteen metadata elements for resource description in a cross-disciplinary information environment.

Bechhofer, S.; Harmelen, F. van; Hendler, J.; Horrocks, I.; McGuinness, D.L.; Patel-Schneider, P.F.; Stein, L.A.: OWL Web Ontology Language Reference (2004) 0.03
```
0.02943101 = product of:
  0.11772404 = sum of:
    0.11772404 = weight(_text_:description in 4684) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11772404 = score(doc=4684,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.23150103 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04979191 = queryNorm
        0.5085249 = fieldWeight in 4684, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4684)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
```
Abstract

The Web Ontology Language OWL is a semantic markup language for publishing and sharing ontologies on the World Wide Web. OWL is developed as a vocabulary extension of RDF (the Resource Description Framework) and is derived from the DAML+OIL Web Ontology Language. This document contains a structured informal description of the full set of OWL language constructs and is meant to serve as a reference for OWL users who want to construct OWL ontologies.

Regeln für die Schlagwortkatalogisierung (RSWK) (2017) 0.03

0.026340859 = product of:
  0.052681718 = sum of:
    0.04162173 = weight(_text_:description in 3459) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04162173 = score(doc=3459,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23150103 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04979191 = queryNorm
        0.17979069 = fieldWeight in 3459, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3459)
    0.011059988 = product of:
      0.022119977 = sum of:
        0.022119977 = weight(_text_:access in 3459) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022119977 = score(doc=3459,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.13106886 = fieldWeight in 3459, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3459)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract: Durch die Einführung des internationalen Regelwerks für die Erschließung, Resource Description and Access (RDA), wurde eine Anpassung der RSWK nötig, gleichzeitig sollten die GND-Übergangsregeln und Anwendungsbestimmungen in das Regelwerk eingearbeitet werden. Aus diesem Grund beauftrage der Standardisierungsausschuss im Juni 2015 die Expertengruppe Sacherschließung, eine Neuauflage der RSWK unter den aktuellen Gegebenheiten zu erstellen. Mit der 4. Auflage wurde der Titel des Regelwerks angepasst: "Regeln für die Schlagwortkatalogisierung" (statt wie bislang "Regeln für den Schlagwortkatalog"). Das etablierte und bekannte Akronym RSWK bleibt erhalten. Zusammen mit den RSWK erscheinen die Erfassungs- und Verwendungshilfen für RSWK-spezifische Sachverhalte (EH-S), welche die bisherigen GND-Übergangsregeln und Anwendungsbestimmungen ablösen sowie noch gültige Inhalte der bisherigen Praxisregeln aufnehmen.

ISO 15489: Records management : Pt. 1: ISO 15489-1: General; Pt.2: ISO/TR 15489-2: Guidelines (2001) 0.02

0.024013536 = product of:
  0.096054144 = sum of:
    0.096054144 = weight(_text_:26 in 480) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.096054144 = score(doc=480,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17584132 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04979191 = queryNorm
        0.5462547 = fieldWeight in 480, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=480)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Date: 13. 8.2004 17:09:26

ISO 25964 Thesauri and interoperability with other vocabularies (2008) 0.02
```
0.022577878 = product of:
  0.045155756 = sum of:
    0.035675768 = weight(_text_:description in 1169) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.035675768 = score(doc=1169,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23150103 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04979191 = queryNorm
        0.1541063 = fieldWeight in 1169, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1169)
    0.009479989 = product of:
      0.018959979 = sum of:
        0.018959979 = weight(_text_:access in 1169) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018959979 = score(doc=1169,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.11234473 = fieldWeight in 1169, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1169)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
```
Abstract

T.2: The ability to identify and locate relevant information among vast collections and other resources is a major and pressing challenge today. Several different types of vocabulary are in use for this purpose. Some of the most widely used vocabularies were designed a hundred years ago and have been evolving steadily. A different generation of vocabularies is now emerging, designed to exploit the electronic media more effectively. A good understanding of the previous generation is still essential for effective access to collections indexed with them. An important object of ISO 25964 as a whole is to support data exchange and other forms of interoperability in circumstances in which more than one structured vocabulary is applied within one retrieval system or network. Sometimes one vocabulary has to be mapped to another, and it is important to understand both the potential and the limitations of such mappings. In other systems, a thesaurus is mapped to a classification scheme, or an ontology to a thesaurus. Comprehensive interoperability needs to cover the whole range of vocabulary types, whether young or old. Concepts in different vocabularies are related only in that they have the same or similar meaning. However, the meaning can be found in a number of different aspects within each particular type of structured vocabulary: - within terms or captions selected in different languages; - in the notation assigned indicating a place within a larger hierarchy; - in the definition, scope notes, history notes and other notes that explain the significance of that concept; and - in explicit relationships to other concepts or entities within the same vocabulary. In order to create mappings from one structured vocabulary to another it is first necessary to understand, within the context of each different type of structured vocabulary, the significance and relative importance of each of the different elements in defining the meaning of that particular concept. ISO 25964-1 describes the key characteristics of thesauri along with additional advice on best practice. ISO 25964-2 focuses on other types of vocabulary and does not attempt to cover all aspects of good practice. It concentrates on those aspects which need to be understood if one of the vocabularies is to work effectively alongside one or more of the others. Recognizing that a new standard cannot be applied to some existing vocabularies, this part of ISO 25964 provides informative description alongside the recommendations, the aim of which is to enable users and system developers to interpret and implement the existing vocabularies effectively. The remainder of ISO 25964-2 deals with the principles and practicalities of establishing mappings between vocabularies.

Z39.50: Information retrieval service and protocol : Information retrieval application service definition and protocol specification for open systems interaction (1992) 0.02

0.02058303 = product of:
  0.08233212 = sum of:
    0.08233212 = weight(_text_:26 in 2889) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08233212 = score(doc=2889,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17584132 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04979191 = queryNorm
        0.4682183 = fieldWeight in 2889, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2889)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Date: 26. 6.1996 16:44:41

Z39.50: Information retrieval service and protocol : Information retrieval application service definition and protocol specification for open systems interaction (1995) 0.02

0.02058303 = product of:
  0.08233212 = sum of:
    0.08233212 = weight(_text_:26 in 4367) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08233212 = score(doc=4367,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17584132 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04979191 = queryNorm
        0.4682183 = fieldWeight in 4367, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4367)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Date: 26. 6.1996 16:44:41

Z39.19-2005: Guidelines for the construction, format, and management of monolingual controlled vocabularies (2005) 0.02
```
0.017837884 = product of:
  0.071351536 = sum of:
    0.071351536 = weight(_text_:description in 708) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.071351536 = score(doc=708,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23150103 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04979191 = queryNorm
        0.3082126 = fieldWeight in 708, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=708)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
```
Abstract

This Standard presents guidelines and conventions for the contents, display, construction, testing, maintenance, and management of monolingual controlled vocabularies. This Standard focuses on controlled vocabularies that are used for the representation of content objects in knowledge organization systems including lists, synonym rings, taxonomies, and thesauri. This Standard should be regarded as a set of recommendations based on preferred techniques and procedures. Optional procedures are, however, sometimes described, e.g., for the display of terms in a controlled vocabulary. The primary purpose of vocabulary control is to achieve consistency in the description of content objects and to facilitate retrieval. Vocabulary control is accomplished by three principal methods: defining the scope, or meaning, of terms; using the equivalence relationship to link synonymous and nearly synonymous terms; and distinguishing among homographs.
OWL Web Ontology Language Semantics and Abstract Syntax (2004) 0.02
```
0.017837884 = product of:
  0.071351536 = sum of:
    0.071351536 = weight(_text_:description in 4683) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.071351536 = score(doc=4683,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23150103 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04979191 = queryNorm
        0.3082126 = fieldWeight in 4683, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4683)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
```
Abstract

This description of OWL, the Web Ontology Language being designed by the W3C Web Ontology Working Group, contains a high-level abstract syntax for both OWL DL and OWL Lite, sublanguages of OWL. A model-theoretic semantics is given to provide a formal meaning for OWL ontologies written in this abstract syntax. A model-theoretic semantics in the form of an extension to the RDF semantics is also given to provide a formal meaning for OWL ontologies as RDF graphs (OWL Full). A mapping from the abstract syntax to RDF graphs is given and the two model theories are shown to have the same consequences on OWL ontologies that can be written in the abstract syntax.
SKOS Core Guide (2005) 0.02
```
0.017837884 = product of:
  0.071351536 = sum of:
    0.071351536 = weight(_text_:description in 4689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.071351536 = score(doc=4689,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23150103 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04979191 = queryNorm
        0.3082126 = fieldWeight in 4689, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4689)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
```
Abstract

SKOS Core provides a model for expressing the basic structure and content of concept schemes such as thesauri, classification schemes, subject heading lists, taxonomies, 'folksonomies', other types of controlled vocabulary, and also concept schemes embedded in glossaries and terminologies. The SKOS Core Vocabulary is an application of the Resource Description Framework (RDF), that can be used to express a concept scheme as an RDF graph. Using RDF allows data to be linked to and/or merged with other data, enabling data sources to be distributed across the web, but still be meaningfully composed and integrated. This document is a guide using the SKOS Core Vocabulary, for readers who already have a basic understanding of RDF concepts. This edition of the SKOS Core Guide [SKOS Core Guide] is a W3C Public Working Draft. It is the authoritative guide to recommended usage of the SKOS Core Vocabulary at the time of publication.
SKOS Simple Knowledge Organization System Primer (2009) 0.02
```
0.017837884 = product of:
  0.071351536 = sum of:
    0.071351536 = weight(_text_:description in 4795) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.071351536 = score(doc=4795,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23150103 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04979191 = queryNorm
        0.3082126 = fieldWeight in 4795, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4795)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
```
Abstract

SKOS (Simple Knowledge Organisation System) provides a model for expressing the basic structure and content of concept schemes such as thesauri, classification schemes, subject heading lists, taxonomies, folksonomies, and other types of controlled vocabulary. As an application of the Resource Description Framework (RDF) SKOS allows concepts to be documented, linked and merged with other data, while still being composed, integrated and published on the World Wide Web. This document is an implementors guide for those who would like to represent their concept scheme using SKOS. In basic SKOS, conceptual resources (concepts) can be identified using URIs, labelled with strings in one or more natural languages, documented with various types of notes, semantically related to each other in informal hierarchies and association networks, and aggregated into distinct concept schemes. In advanced SKOS, conceptual resources can be mapped to conceptual resources in other schemes and grouped into labelled or ordered collections. Concept labels can also be related to each other. Finally, the SKOS vocabulary itself can be extended to suit the needs of particular communities of practice.
Miller, E.; Schloss. B.; Lassila, O.; Swick, R.R.: Resource Description Framework (RDF) : model and syntax (1997) 0.01
```
0.014715505 = product of:
  0.05886202 = sum of:
    0.05886202 = weight(_text_:description in 5903) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05886202 = score(doc=5903,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.23150103 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04979191 = queryNorm
        0.25426245 = fieldWeight in 5903, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=5903)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
```
Abstract

RDF - the Resource Description Framework - is a foundation for processing metadata; it provides interoperability between applications that exchange machine-understandable information on the Web. RDF emphasizes facilities to enable automated processing of Web resources. RDF metadata can be used in a variety of application areas; for example: in resource discovery to provide better search engine capabilities; in cataloging for describing the content and content relationships available at a particular Web site, page, or digital library; by intelligent software agents to facilitate knowledge sharing and exchange; in content rating; in describing collections of pages that represent a single logical "document"; for describing intellectual property rights of Web pages, and in many others. RDF with digital signatures will be key to building the "Web of Trust" for electronic commerce, collaboration, and other applications. Metadata is "data about data" or specifically in the context of RDF "data describing web resources." The distinction between "data" and "metadata" is not an absolute one; it is a distinction created primarily by a particular application. Many times the same resource will be interpreted in both ways simultaneously. RDF encourages this view by using XML as the encoding syntax for the metadata. The resources being described by RDF are, in general, anything that can be named via a URI. The broad goal of RDF is to define a mechanism for describing resources that makes no assumptions about a particular application domain, nor defines the semantics of any application domain. The definition of the mechanism should be domain neutral, yet the mechanism should be suitable for describing information about any domain. This document introduces a model for representing RDF metadata and one syntax for expressing and transporting this metadata in a manner that maximizes the interoperability of independently developed web servers and clients. The syntax described in this document is best considered as a "serialization syntax" for the underlying RDF representation model. The serialization syntax is XML, XML being the W3C's work-in-progress to define a richer Web syntax for a variety of applications. RDF and XML are complementary; there will be alternate ways to represent the same RDF data model, some more suitable for direct human authoring. Future work may lead to including such alternatives in this document.

ISO 25964-2: Thesauri and interoperability with other vocabularies : Part 2: Interoperability with other vocabularies (2013) 0.01

0.012006768 = product of:
  0.048027072 = sum of:
    0.048027072 = weight(_text_:26 in 4832) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.048027072 = score(doc=4832,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17584132 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04979191 = queryNorm
        0.27312735 = fieldWeight in 4832, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4832)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Date: 30. 5.2015 19:04:26

Search (25 results, page 1 of 2)

Authors

Years

Languages

Types

Themes