Search (4658 results, page 2 of 233)

0.077567935 = product of:
  0.15513587 = sum of:
    0.15513587 = sum of:
      0.099512465 = weight(_text_:media in 6424) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.099512465 = score(doc=6424,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.24036849 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051318336 = queryNorm
          0.41399965 = fieldWeight in 6424, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6424)
      0.05562341 = weight(_text_:22 in 6424) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05562341 = score(doc=6424,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17970806 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051318336 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6424, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6424)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Librarians responsible for organizing access to library collections have an obligation to plan for the future. Developments in the world of information which will inevitably have an impact on how they do their jobs include new forms of media, new cataloguing tools and standards, and new methods of creating, acquiring, and searching for data. Equally if not more important, new models are needed for the range of services which bibliographic control units are working to provide, and for the roles which these units will play in the larger organization

Source

Journal of library administration. 22(1996) nos.2/3, S.123-132

0.077567935 = product of:
  0.15513587 = sum of:
    0.15513587 = sum of:
      0.099512465 = weight(_text_:media in 6732) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.099512465 = score(doc=6732,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.24036849 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051318336 = queryNorm
          0.41399965 = fieldWeight in 6732, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6732)
      0.05562341 = weight(_text_:22 in 6732) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05562341 = score(doc=6732,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17970806 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051318336 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6732, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6732)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Considers the problem of applying standard concepts of cataloguing and bibliographic control to electronic media by studying the degree of fit between the Standford Integrated Digital Library Project (SDLP) and both the USMARC format and the Text Encoding Initiative (TEI). Notes the lack of fit of both USMARC and TEI but stresses the advantages of the latter due its lack of dependency on 3 digit tags and its use of SGML conventions

Series

Cataloging and classification quarterly; vol.22, nos.3/4

0.077567935 = product of:
  0.15513587 = sum of:
    0.15513587 = sum of:
      0.099512465 = weight(_text_:media in 7231) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.099512465 = score(doc=7231,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.24036849 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051318336 = queryNorm
          0.41399965 = fieldWeight in 7231, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7231)
      0.05562341 = weight(_text_:22 in 7231) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05562341 = score(doc=7231,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17970806 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051318336 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7231, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7231)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Considers the new Guidelines for bibliographic description of interactive multimedia published by the ALA in 1994. Examines the current and future status of the Guidelines and discusses the problems involved in applying them to the media coming into the library at La Trobe University, Victoria, Australia

Source

Cataloguing Australia. 22(1996) nos.1/2, S.17-20

0.077567935 = product of:
  0.15513587 = sum of:
    0.15513587 = sum of:
      0.099512465 = weight(_text_:media in 7232) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.099512465 = score(doc=7232,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.24036849 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051318336 = queryNorm
          0.41399965 = fieldWeight in 7232, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7232)
      0.05562341 = weight(_text_:22 in 7232) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05562341 = score(doc=7232,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17970806 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051318336 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7232, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7232)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Footnote

Paper presented at conference on 'Local documents, a new classification scheme' at the Research Caucus of the Florida Library Association Annual Conference, Fort Lauderdale, Florida 22 Apr 95

Source

Journal of educational media and library sciences. 34(1996) no.1, S.10-18

0.077567935 = product of:
  0.15513587 = sum of:
    0.15513587 = sum of:
      0.099512465 = weight(_text_:media in 336) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.099512465 = score(doc=336,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.24036849 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051318336 = queryNorm
          0.41399965 = fieldWeight in 336, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=336)
      0.05562341 = weight(_text_:22 in 336) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05562341 = score(doc=336,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17970806 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051318336 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 336, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=336)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

The growing interest in end user or direct patron access to on-line bibliographic databases is reviewed with references to online catalogues, databases, and CD-ROMs. The literature of end user searching is surveyed with notes on: user training, software search aids, end user services in libraries: characterisation of end user searches; the role of librarians; and CD-ROMs as end user media

Source

Annual review of information science and technology. 22(1987), S.227-263

0.077567935 = product of:
  0.15513587 = sum of:
    0.15513587 = sum of:
      0.099512465 = weight(_text_:media in 403) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.099512465 = score(doc=403,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.24036849 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051318336 = queryNorm
          0.41399965 = fieldWeight in 403, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=403)
      0.05562341 = weight(_text_:22 in 403) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05562341 = score(doc=403,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17970806 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051318336 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 403, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=403)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Link-up. 14(1997) no.2, S.22

0.077567935 = product of:
  0.15513587 = sum of:
    0.15513587 = sum of:
      0.099512465 = weight(_text_:media in 3696) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.099512465 = score(doc=3696,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.24036849 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051318336 = queryNorm
          0.41399965 = fieldWeight in 3696, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3696)
      0.05562341 = weight(_text_:22 in 3696) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05562341 = score(doc=3696,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17970806 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051318336 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3696, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3696)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

The terms: information society, the information age, the knowledge based society and the knowledge driven economy are all now familiar terms. Governments have been promoting them, the media has been reporting on them and leaders use them to indicate progress and advancement. In light of all this exposure, considers just how far along the road are these societies from the industrial age towards the information age

Date

22. 5.1999 19:55:13

0.077567935 = product of:
  0.15513587 = sum of:
    0.15513587 = sum of:
      0.099512465 = weight(_text_:media in 2852) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.099512465 = score(doc=2852,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.24036849 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051318336 = queryNorm
          0.41399965 = fieldWeight in 2852, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2852)
      0.05562341 = weight(_text_:22 in 2852) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05562341 = score(doc=2852,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17970806 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051318336 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2852, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2852)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

The World Civilizations Image Repository (WCIR) and Photos Online are two collaborative image database projects under way at the Washington State University (WSU) Libraries. These projects demonstrate how the WSU Libraries have employed OCLC/DiMeMa's (Digital Media Management) CONTENTdm in partnership with other University departments to develop visual collections free from copyright restrictions, as well as to manage "born digital" images on a collaborative basis.

Source

Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.198-208

0.077567935 = product of:
  0.15513587 = sum of:
    0.15513587 = sum of:
      0.099512465 = weight(_text_:media in 5083) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.099512465 = score(doc=5083,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.24036849 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051318336 = queryNorm
          0.41399965 = fieldWeight in 5083, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5083)
      0.05562341 = weight(_text_:22 in 5083) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05562341 = score(doc=5083,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17970806 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051318336 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5083, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5083)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

27. 5.2007 22:19:35

Source

Journal of educational media and library sciences. 47(2006) no.2, S.153-171

0.077567935 = product of:
  0.15513587 = sum of:
    0.15513587 = sum of:
      0.099512465 = weight(_text_:media in 5549) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.099512465 = score(doc=5549,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.24036849 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051318336 = queryNorm
          0.41399965 = fieldWeight in 5549, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5549)
      0.05562341 = weight(_text_:22 in 5549) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05562341 = score(doc=5549,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17970806 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051318336 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5549, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5549)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Selecting electronic resources requires both a policy statement to guide collection development and management and procedures to manage the process of selecting and handling these resources. Both policy and procedures must be crafted in response to local priorities, resources, limitations, and organizational structure. This paper examines issues that should be addressed when developing local procedures. Particular emphasis is given to preparing a mechanism to guide selection between various media and modes of information delivery-is explored.

Source

Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.9-24

0.077567935 = product of:
  0.15513587 = sum of:
    0.15513587 = sum of:
      0.099512465 = weight(_text_:media in 1484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.099512465 = score(doc=1484,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.24036849 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051318336 = queryNorm
          0.41399965 = fieldWeight in 1484, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1484)
      0.05562341 = weight(_text_:22 in 1484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05562341 = score(doc=1484,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17970806 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051318336 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1484, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1484)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

13. 9.2014 14:45:22

Source

http://www.searchmetrics.com/media/documents/knowledge-base/searchmetrics-ranking-faktoren-studie-2014.pdf

0.077567935 = product of:
  0.15513587 = sum of:
    0.15513587 = sum of:
      0.099512465 = weight(_text_:media in 318) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.099512465 = score(doc=318,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.24036849 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051318336 = queryNorm
          0.41399965 = fieldWeight in 318, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=318)
      0.05562341 = weight(_text_:22 in 318) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05562341 = score(doc=318,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17970806 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051318336 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 318, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=318)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

In der Session "Knowledge Representation" auf der ISI 2021 wurden unter der Moderation von Jürgen Reischer (Uni Regensburg) drei Projekte vorgestellt, in denen Knowledge Representation mit RDF umgesetzt wird. Die Domänen sind erfreulich unterschiedlich, die gemeinsame Klammer indes ist die Absicht, den Zugang zu Forschungsdaten zu verbessern: - Japanese Visual Media Graph - Taxonomy of Digital Research Activities in the Humanities - Forschungsdaten im konzeptuellen Modell von FRBR

Date

22. 5.2021 12:43:05

0.07540778 = product of:
  0.15081556 = sum of:
    0.15081556 = product of:
      0.30163112 = sum of:
        0.30163112 = weight(_text_:media in 5887) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.30163112 = score(doc=5887,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.24036849 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051318336 = queryNorm
            1.2548697 = fieldWeight in 5887, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5887)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

COMPASS

Mass media / Information sources

Subject

Mass media / Information sources

0.07363323 = product of:
  0.14726646 = sum of:
    0.14726646 = sum of:
      0.10554891 = weight(_text_:media in 5123) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.10554891 = score(doc=5123,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.24036849 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051318336 = queryNorm
          0.43911293 = fieldWeight in 5123, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5123)
      0.041717555 = weight(_text_:22 in 5123) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.041717555 = score(doc=5123,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17970806 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051318336 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5123, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5123)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Traces the development of text searching and retrieval software designed to cope with the increasing demands made by the storage and handling of large amounts of data, recorded on high data storage media, from CD-ROM to multi gigabyte storage media and online information services, with particular reference to the need to cope with graphics as well as conventional ASCII text. Includes details of: Boolean searching, fuzzy searching and matching; relevance ranking; proximity searching and improved strategies for dealing with text searching in very large databases. Concludes that the best searching tools for CD-ROM publishers are those optimized for searching and retrieval on CD-ROM. CD-ROM drives have relatively lower random seek times than hard discs and so the software most appropriate to the medium is that which can effectively arrange the indexes and text on the CD-ROM to avoid continuous random access searching. Lists and reviews a selection of software packages designed to achieve the sort of results required for rapid CD-ROM searching

Date

12. 9.1996 13:56:22

0.07363323 = product of:
  0.14726646 = sum of:
    0.14726646 = sum of:
      0.10554891 = weight(_text_:media in 2603) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.10554891 = score(doc=2603,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.24036849 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051318336 = queryNorm
          0.43911293 = fieldWeight in 2603, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2603)
      0.041717555 = weight(_text_:22 in 2603) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.041717555 = score(doc=2603,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17970806 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051318336 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2603, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2603)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

This comprehensive annotated webliography describes online cataloging resources that are free to use, currently updated, and of high quality. The major aim of this webliography is to provide assistance for catalogers who are new to the profession, unfamiliar with cataloging specific formats, or unable to access costly print and subscription resources. The annotated resources include general websites and webpages, databases, workshop presentations, streaming media, and local documentation. The scope of the webliography is limited to resources reflecting traditional cataloging practices using the Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules, 2nd edition, RDA: Resource Description and Access, and MAchine Readable Cataloging (MARC) standards. Non-MARC metadata schemas like Dublin Core are not covered. Most components of cataloging are represented in this webliography, such as authority control, classification, subject headings, and genre terms. Guidance also is provided for cataloging miscellaneous formats including sound and videorecordings, streaming media, e-books, video games, graphic novels, kits, rare materials, maps, serials, realia, government documents, and music.

Date

10. 9.2000 17:38:22

0.07363323 = product of:
  0.14726646 = sum of:
    0.14726646 = sum of:
      0.10554891 = weight(_text_:media in 3589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.10554891 = score(doc=3589,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.24036849 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051318336 = queryNorm
          0.43911293 = fieldWeight in 3589, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3589)
      0.041717555 = weight(_text_:22 in 3589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.041717555 = score(doc=3589,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17970806 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051318336 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3589, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3589)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Information searching in practice seldom is an end in itself. In work, work task (WT) performance forms the context, which information searching should serve. Therefore, information retrieval (IR) systems development/evaluation should take the WT context into account. The present paper analyzes how WT features: task complexity and task types, affect information searching in authentic work: the types of information needs, search processes, and search media. We collected data on 22 information professionals in authentic work situations in three organization types: city administration, universities, and companies. The data comprise 286 WTs and 420 search tasks (STs). The data include transaction logs, video recordings, daily questionnaires, interviews. and observation. The data were analyzed quantitatively. Even if the participants used a range of search media, most STs were simple throughout the data, and up to 42% of WTs did not include searching. WT's effects on STs are not straightforward: different WT types react differently to WT complexity. Due to the simplicity of authentic searching, the WT/ST types in interactive IR experiments should be reconsidered.

0.07124502 = product of:
  0.14249004 = sum of:
    0.14249004 = sum of:
      0.10772541 = weight(_text_:media in 1397) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.10772541 = score(doc=1397,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.24036849 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051318336 = queryNorm
          0.44816777 = fieldWeight in 1397, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1397)
      0.03476463 = weight(_text_:22 in 1397) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03476463 = score(doc=1397,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17970806 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051318336 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1397, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1397)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

The "Screen Design Manual" provides designers of interactive media with a practical working guide for preparing and presenting information that is suitable for both their target groups and the media they are using. It describes background information and relationships, clarifies them with the help of examples, and encourages further development of the language of digital media. In addition to the basics of the psychology of perception and learning, ergonomics, communication theory, imagery research, and aesthetics, the book also explores the design of navigation and orientation elements. Guidelines and checklists, along with the unique presentation of the book, support the application of information in practice.

Date

22. 3.2008 14:29:25

0.07124502 = product of:
  0.14249004 = sum of:
    0.14249004 = sum of:
      0.10772541 = weight(_text_:media in 3698) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.10772541 = score(doc=3698,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.24036849 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051318336 = queryNorm
          0.44816777 = fieldWeight in 3698, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3698)
      0.03476463 = weight(_text_:22 in 3698) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03476463 = score(doc=3698,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17970806 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051318336 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3698, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3698)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Although bibliographic classifications usually adopt a perspective different from that of object classifications, the two have obvious relationships. These become especially relevant when users are looking for knowledge scattered in a wide variety of forms and media. This is an increasingly common situation, as library catalogues now coexist in the global digital environment with catalogues of archives, of museums, of commercial products, and many other information resources. In order to make the subject content of all these resources searchable, a broader conception of classification is needed, that can be applied to an knowledge item, rather than only bibliographic materials. To illustrate this we take an example of the research on bagpipes in Northern Italian folklore. For this kind of research, the most effective search strategy is a cross-media one, looking for many different knowledge sources such as published documents, police archives, painting details, museum specimens, organizations devoted to related subjects. To provide satisfying results for this kind of search, the traditional disciplinary approach to classification is not sufficient. Tools are needed in which knowledge items dealing with a phenomenon of interest can be retrieved independently from the other topics with which it is combined, the disciplinary context, and the medium where it occurs. This can be made possible if the basic units of classification are taken to be the phenomena treated, as recommended in the León Manifesto, rather than disciplines or other aspect features. The concept of bagpipes should be retrievable and browsable in any combination with other phenomena, disciplines, media etc. Examples are given of information sources that could be managed by this freely-faceted technique of classification.

Date

22. 7.2010 20:40:08

0.07124502 = product of:
  0.14249004 = sum of:
    0.14249004 = sum of:
      0.10772541 = weight(_text_:media in 2635) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.10772541 = score(doc=2635,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.24036849 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051318336 = queryNorm
          0.44816777 = fieldWeight in 2635, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2635)
      0.03476463 = weight(_text_:22 in 2635) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03476463 = score(doc=2635,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17970806 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051318336 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2635, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2635)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Political sentiment analysis using social media, especially Twitter, has attracted wide interest in recent years. In such research, opinions about politicians are typically divided into positive, negative, or neutral. In our research, the goal is to mine political opinion from social media at a higher resolution by assessing statements of opinion related to the personality traits of politicians; this is an angle that has not yet been considered in social media research. A second goal is to contribute a novel retrieval-based approach for tracking public perception of personality using Gough and Heilbrun's Adjective Check List (ACL) of 110 terms describing key traits. This is in contrast to the typical lexical and machine-learning approaches used in sentiment analysis. High-precision search templates developed from the ACL were run on an 18-month span of Twitter posts mentioning Obama and Romney and these retrieved more than half a million tweets. For example, the results indicated that Romney was perceived as more of an achiever and Obama was perceived as somewhat more friendly. The traits were also aggregated into 14 broad personality dimensions. For example, Obama rated far higher than Romney on the Moderation dimension and lower on the Machiavellianism dimension. The temporal variability of such perceptions was explored.

Date

22. 1.2016 11:25:47

0.07036594 = product of:
  0.14073189 = sum of:
    0.14073189 = product of:
      0.28146377 = sum of:
        0.28146377 = weight(_text_:media in 7327) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.28146377 = score(doc=7327,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.24036849 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051318336 = queryNorm
            1.1709678 = fieldWeight in 7327, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7327)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Issue devoted to media literacy