Search (5742 results, page 2 of 288)

  1. Benavitz, W.R. III.: Cataloging Napoleonic meniatures (1996) 0.10
    0.099105485 = product of:
      0.19821097 = sum of:
        0.19821097 = sum of:
          0.14211231 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 4908) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.14211231 = score(doc=4908,freq=8.0), product of:
              0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051756795 = queryNorm
              0.6966982 = fieldWeight in 4908, product of:
                2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                  8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4908)
          0.05609865 = weight(_text_:22 in 4908) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05609865 = score(doc=4908,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051756795 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4908, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4908)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Chapter 1, "General Rules for Description", and Chapter 10, "Three Dimensional Artifacts and Realia" of AACR2R are clarified or modified for descriptive cataloging of Napoleonic miniatures. Rule 1.4G3 is disregarded because Rule 1.4F9 is modified. Rule 10.5C2 and Rule 10.0H1 are disregarded because of the nature of Napoleonic miniatures. The article promotes the use and modification of AACR2R, LCSH, and other bibliographic methods for cataloging and classifying museum items, three-dimensional artefacts, and realia in order to make them accessible.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) no.1, S.49-67
  2. Spillane, J.L.: Comparison of required introductory cataloging courses, 1986 to 1998 (1999) 0.10
    0.099105485 = product of:
      0.19821097 = sum of:
        0.19821097 = sum of:
          0.14211231 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 4946) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.14211231 = score(doc=4946,freq=8.0), product of:
              0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051756795 = queryNorm
              0.6966982 = fieldWeight in 4946, product of:
                2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                  8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4946)
          0.05609865 = weight(_text_:22 in 4946) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05609865 = score(doc=4946,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051756795 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4946, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4946)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Cataloging is an important part of library education. Concerns about the declining number of required introductory cataloging courses led to this study in which data collected from library school bulletins were compared to data gathered in a similar 1986 study. Results indicate that the number of required iniroductory cataloging courses has dropped.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  3. Gorman, M.: Metadata or cataloguing? : a false choice (1999) 0.10
    0.099105485 = product of:
      0.19821097 = sum of:
        0.19821097 = sum of:
          0.14211231 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 6095) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.14211231 = score(doc=6095,freq=8.0), product of:
              0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051756795 = queryNorm
              0.6966982 = fieldWeight in 6095, product of:
                2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                  8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6095)
          0.05609865 = weight(_text_:22 in 6095) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05609865 = score(doc=6095,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051756795 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6095, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6095)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Libraries, their collections, and bibliographic control are essential components of the provision of access to recorded knowledge. Cataloging is a primary method of bibliographic control. Full or traditional cataloging is very expensive, but relying on keyword searching is inadequate. Alternatives for a solution to cataloging needs for electronic resources including the use of metadata and the Dublin Core are examined. Many questions exist regarding the long-term future of today's electronic documents. Recommendations are made for preserving recorded knowledge and information in the electronic resources for future generations
    Source
    Journal of Internet cataloging. 2(1999) no.1, S.5-22
  4. Struble, C.A.; Kohberger, P.B.: Statistical survey to determine availability of cataloging copy on OCLC (1987) 0.10
    0.099105485 = product of:
      0.19821097 = sum of:
        0.19821097 = sum of:
          0.14211231 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 358) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.14211231 = score(doc=358,freq=8.0), product of:
              0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051756795 = queryNorm
              0.6966982 = fieldWeight in 358, product of:
                2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                  8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=358)
          0.05609865 = weight(_text_:22 in 358) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05609865 = score(doc=358,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051756795 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 358, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=358)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This paper reports the results of a year-long survey conducted at the University of Pittsburgh (Pitt) to determine what level of cataloging copy (Library of Congress, member input, or none) is present on OCLC at the time an item is received in Technical Services and after a six-month waiting period. These results were used to divert selected monographs from the normal workflow in order to expedite their cataloging and to release needed shelf space for other items.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 7(1987) no.3, S.13-22
  5. Steinhagen, E.N.: Historical perspective of a union catalog in Chile : authorities and periodicals (2003) 0.10
    0.09786703 = product of:
      0.19573405 = sum of:
        0.19573405 = sum of:
          0.12561074 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 4064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.12561074 = score(doc=4064,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051756795 = queryNorm
              0.6158 = fieldWeight in 4064, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4064)
          0.070123315 = weight(_text_:22 in 4064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.070123315 = score(doc=4064,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051756795 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4064, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4064)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    29. 7.2006 20:06:22
    Footnote
    Also published as Cataloging and Classification Quarterly, 35(2002/03)1/2 and 35(2002/03)3/4
    Source
    Historical aspects of cataloging and classification. Ed.: M.D. Joachim
  6. Lee-Smeltzer, K.-H. (Janet): Cataloging in three academic libraries: operations, trends, and perspectives (2000) 0.10
    0.096403435 = product of:
      0.19280687 = sum of:
        0.19280687 = sum of:
          0.15073287 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 5386) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.15073287 = score(doc=5386,freq=16.0), product of:
              0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051756795 = queryNorm
              0.73896 = fieldWeight in 5386, product of:
                4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                  16.0 = termFreq=16.0
                3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5386)
          0.042073987 = weight(_text_:22 in 5386) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042073987 = score(doc=5386,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051756795 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5386, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5386)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This article describes the cataloging operations and management in three medium-sized academic libraries - Oregon State University, University of Houston, and Colorado State University. It provides an overview of the staffing and organizational structure of the cataloging department in each library. Faced with similar challenges from constantly changing environments brought about by technology and institutional pressure to achieve more with less, library technical services in these three libraries, cataloging in particular, are developing some common strategies for coping. These trends include: (1) changing the roles and responsibilities of both professional and support staff (2) designing workflow around library systems and limited personnel resources, (3) mainstreaming government documents cataloging and processing into technical services, (4) using technology to increase cataloging efficiency, and (5) dealing with bibliographic control of current electronic resources and moving into digitization and metadata arenas.
    Date
    27. 7.2006 18:22:11
    Footnote
    Beitrag eines Themenheftes "Managing cataloging and the organization of information: philosophies, practices and challenges at the onset of the 21st century. Part II: Specialized and academic libraries in the United States"
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 30(2000) nos.2/3, S.315-329
  7. Weiss, A.K.: Proliferating guidelines : a history and analysis of the cataloging of electronic resources (2003) 0.10
    0.096403435 = product of:
      0.19280687 = sum of:
        0.19280687 = sum of:
          0.15073287 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 71) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.15073287 = score(doc=71,freq=16.0), product of:
              0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051756795 = queryNorm
              0.73896 = fieldWeight in 71, product of:
                4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                  16.0 = termFreq=16.0
                3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=71)
          0.042073987 = weight(_text_:22 in 71) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042073987 = score(doc=71,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051756795 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 71, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=71)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Cataloging rules for computer-based materials were first introduced in the 1970s, and since then have undergone almost continuous modification and revision. This article focuses on analysis and comparison of the various codes and guidelines for practice issued for what are now called electronic resources. Creation of new cataloging rules has been spurred by introduction of new physical carriers, the preeminence of materials accessed remotely versus those with physical carriers, the need for guidance in cataloging specific instances of computer-based materials, and the evolution of the theoretical concerns underlying the cataloging codes. Based on this history of constant change, it is easy to predict many more changes in the cataloging standards for computer-based materials in the future. However, continuous changes in the cataloging rules may have produced as much confusion as clarity for working catalogers. Caution should be exercised in the creation of new rules and standards for cataloging electronic resources, as it is possible that older rules and standards may, in fact, be readily adapted to new types of electronic resources.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  8. Electronic Resources: Selection and Bibliographic Control : [Themenheft] (1996) 0.10
    0.095366105 = product of:
      0.19073221 = sum of:
        0.19073221 = sum of:
          0.106584236 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 4206) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.106584236 = score(doc=4206,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051756795 = queryNorm
              0.52252364 = fieldWeight in 4206, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4206)
          0.084147975 = weight(_text_:22 in 4206) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.084147975 = score(doc=4206,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051756795 = queryNorm
              0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4206, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4206)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.1-238
  9. Chan, L.M.: Library of Congress Subject Headings : principles and application (1995) 0.10
    0.095366105 = product of:
      0.19073221 = sum of:
        0.19073221 = sum of:
          0.106584236 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 3985) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.106584236 = score(doc=3985,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051756795 = queryNorm
              0.52252364 = fieldWeight in 3985, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3985)
          0.084147975 = weight(_text_:22 in 3985) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.084147975 = score(doc=3985,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051756795 = queryNorm
              0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3985, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3985)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    25.11.2005 18:37:22
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Cataloging and classification quarterly 23(1996) no.1, S.127-130 (L. Kuyper-Rushing)
  10. Languages of the world : cataloguing issues and problems (1993) 0.10
    0.095366105 = product of:
      0.19073221 = sum of:
        0.19073221 = sum of:
          0.106584236 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 4242) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.106584236 = score(doc=4242,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051756795 = queryNorm
              0.52252364 = fieldWeight in 4242, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4242)
          0.084147975 = weight(_text_:22 in 4242) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.084147975 = score(doc=4242,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051756795 = queryNorm
              0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4242, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4242)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    15. 6.1996 18:06:22
    Series
    Cataloging and classification quarterly; vol.17, nos.1/2
  11. Martin, S.K.: ¬The union catalogue : summary and future directions (1982) 0.10
    0.095366105 = product of:
      0.19073221 = sum of:
        0.19073221 = sum of:
          0.106584236 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 290) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.106584236 = score(doc=290,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051756795 = queryNorm
              0.52252364 = fieldWeight in 290, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=290)
          0.084147975 = weight(_text_:22 in 290) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.084147975 = score(doc=290,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051756795 = queryNorm
              0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 290, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=290)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    6. 1.2007 14:49:22
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 2(1982) nos.1/2, S.121-125
  12. Lubetzky, S.: Writings on the classical art of cataloging (2001) 0.10
    0.095366105 = product of:
      0.19073221 = sum of:
        0.19073221 = sum of:
          0.106584236 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 2622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.106584236 = score(doc=2622,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051756795 = queryNorm
              0.52252364 = fieldWeight in 2622, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2622)
          0.084147975 = weight(_text_:22 in 2622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.084147975 = score(doc=2622,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051756795 = queryNorm
              0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2622, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2622)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Technicalities 22(2002) no.1, S.19-20 (S.S. Intner)
  13. Olson, C.: Cataloging Southeast Asian language materials : the case of the Thai language (1996) 0.09
    0.094055966 = product of:
      0.18811193 = sum of:
        0.18811193 = sum of:
          0.13902561 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 5112) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.13902561 = score(doc=5112,freq=10.0), product of:
              0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051756795 = queryNorm
              0.68156576 = fieldWeight in 5112, product of:
                3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                  10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5112)
          0.049086317 = weight(_text_:22 in 5112) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049086317 = score(doc=5112,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051756795 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5112, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5112)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Cataloging and accessing non-roman languages, such as the languages in the JACKPHY group, have been better served because of the inclusion of vernacular languages in their bibliographic records. However, Southeast Asian languages such as Thai, Lao or even Burmese present other problems for catalogers because only romanized versions of these languages are present in current bibliographic records. The problems in cataloging and accessing the materials in these languages occur not only because of the romanization system but also due to the nature of the languages themselves. This paper presents a number of problems related to the cataloging of Thai language materials.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) no.2, S.10-28
  14. Davies-Brown, B.; Williamson, D.: Cataloging at the Library of Congress in the digital age (1996) 0.09
    0.094055966 = product of:
      0.18811193 = sum of:
        0.18811193 = sum of:
          0.13902561 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 2118) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.13902561 = score(doc=2118,freq=10.0), product of:
              0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051756795 = queryNorm
              0.68156576 = fieldWeight in 2118, product of:
                3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                  10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2118)
          0.049086317 = weight(_text_:22 in 2118) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049086317 = score(doc=2118,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051756795 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2118, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2118)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The Library of Congress is participating in a number of initiatives to explore issues surrounding description and cataloging of digital materials. Additionally, programs have been written by LC staff which enable electronic enhancements in cataloging activities, such as the receipt of online information from publishers in the Electronic CIP Program. This paper is both an overview of the status of cataloging-related digital projects at LC and a description of software which facilitates productivity through the provision of advanced search capabilities and the elimination of repetitive keying.
    Series
    Cataloging and classification quarterly; vol.22, nos.3/4
  15. Blake, V.L.P.: Forging the Anglo-American cataloging alliance : descriptive cataloging, 1830-1908 (2002) 0.09
    0.094055966 = product of:
      0.18811193 = sum of:
        0.18811193 = sum of:
          0.13902561 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 5479) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.13902561 = score(doc=5479,freq=10.0), product of:
              0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051756795 = queryNorm
              0.68156576 = fieldWeight in 5479, product of:
                3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                  10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5479)
          0.049086317 = weight(_text_:22 in 5479) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049086317 = score(doc=5479,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051756795 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5479, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5479)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This paper discusses the development of descriptive cataloging from 1830 to 1908 and focuses on the careers of Antonio Panizzi, Charles Coffin Jewett, and Charles Ammi Cutter and the development of the American Library Association (ALA) and the Library Association of the United Kingdom (LAUK). It analyzes the various rules and codes put forth by both Americans and British librarians and the eventual cooperation between the United States and the United Kingdom.
    Footnote
    Beitrag eines Themenheftes: Historical aspects of cataloging and classification; Part I
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 35(2002) nos.1/2, S.3-22
  16. Marcum, D.B.: ¬The future of cataloging (2006) 0.09
    0.094055966 = product of:
      0.18811193 = sum of:
        0.18811193 = sum of:
          0.13902561 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 114) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.13902561 = score(doc=114,freq=10.0), product of:
              0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051756795 = queryNorm
              0.68156576 = fieldWeight in 114, product of:
                3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                  10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=114)
          0.049086317 = weight(_text_:22 in 114) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049086317 = score(doc=114,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051756795 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 114, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=114)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This paper explores cataloging in the Age of Google. It considers what the technologies now being adopted mean for cataloging in the future. The author begins by exploring how digital-era students do research-they find using Google easier than using libraries. Mass digitization projects now are bringing into question the role that library cataloging has traditionally performed. The author asks readers to consider if the detailed attention librarians have been paying to descriptive cataloging can still be justified, and if cost-effective means for access should be considered.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  17. Bothmann, R.: Cataloging electronic books (2004) 0.09
    0.094055966 = product of:
      0.18811193 = sum of:
        0.18811193 = sum of:
          0.13902561 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 129) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.13902561 = score(doc=129,freq=10.0), product of:
              0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051756795 = queryNorm
              0.68156576 = fieldWeight in 129, product of:
                3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                  10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=129)
          0.049086317 = weight(_text_:22 in 129) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049086317 = score(doc=129,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051756795 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 129, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=129)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Papers on the cataloging of electronic resources have focused on electronic journals and Internet resources such as Web sites and not on electronic books. Electronic books are nonserial monographic resources accessed with a computer either directly or remotely. Rules and standards for cataloging electronic resources have changed and continue to change. This article discusses the electronic book as a unique manifestation and provides practical instruction on the application of current cataloging rules. The cataloging elements covered are control fields and variable data fields, including classification, uniform titles, title information, edition information, type and extent of the resource, publication and distribution information, physical description, series statements, notes, and subject analysis.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  18. Letarte, K.M.; Turvey, M.R.; Bornemann, D.; Adams, D.L.: Practitioner perspectives on cataloging education for entry-level academic Librarians (2002) 0.09
    0.094055966 = product of:
      0.18811193 = sum of:
        0.18811193 = sum of:
          0.13902561 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.13902561 = score(doc=158,freq=10.0), product of:
              0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051756795 = queryNorm
              0.68156576 = fieldWeight in 158, product of:
                3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                  10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=158)
          0.049086317 = weight(_text_:22 in 158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049086317 = score(doc=158,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051756795 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 158, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=158)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The role of cataloging education within the library profession is a topic of considerable interest and debate. Fifty-five heads of reference and sixty-five heads of cataloging in Association of Research Librarians institutions responded to a survey based upon the Association for Library Collections and Technical Services Educational Policy Statement, Appendix: Knowledge and Skills, Intellectual Access and Information Organization, concerning the importance of cataloging competencies for all entry-level academic librarians. The survey found that practitioners agreed upon a definite set of core cataloging competencies that all entry-level academic librarians should possess. This finding holds larger implications for library education for academic librarians and for the profession as a whole.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  19. Byrd, J.: ¬A cooperative cataloguing proposal for Slavic and East European languages and the languages of the former Soviet Union (1993) 0.09
    0.094055966 = product of:
      0.18811193 = sum of:
        0.18811193 = sum of:
          0.13902561 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.13902561 = score(doc=564,freq=10.0), product of:
              0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051756795 = queryNorm
              0.68156576 = fieldWeight in 564, product of:
                3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                  10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=564)
          0.049086317 = weight(_text_:22 in 564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049086317 = score(doc=564,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051756795 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 564, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=564)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This paper proposes, as a backlog reduction strategy, a national cooperative cataloging program among libraries with major collections in the Slavic and East European languages and in the languages of the former Soviet Union. The long-standing problem of cataloging backlogs is discussed, including a brief discussion of some of the other ways that have been used to address the problem. The proposal for a cooperative effort is outlined and some of the cataloging issues to be considered are discussed.
    Date
    12. 1.2007 13:22:35
    Footnote
    Simultaneously published as Languages of the World: Cataloging Issues and Problems
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 17(1993) nos.1/2, S.87-96
  20. Davis-Brown, B.; Williamson, D.: Cataloging at the Library of Congress in the digital age (1996) 0.09
    0.094055966 = product of:
      0.18811193 = sum of:
        0.18811193 = sum of:
          0.13902561 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.13902561 = score(doc=604,freq=10.0), product of:
              0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051756795 = queryNorm
              0.68156576 = fieldWeight in 604, product of:
                3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                  10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=604)
          0.049086317 = weight(_text_:22 in 604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049086317 = score(doc=604,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051756795 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 604, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=604)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The Library of Congress is participating in a number of initiatives to explore issues surrounding description and cataloging of digital materials. Addtionally, programs have been written by LC staff which enable electronic enhancements in cataloging activities, such as the receipt of online information from publishers in the Electronic CIP Program. This paper is both an overview of the status of cataloging-related digital projects at LC and a description of software which facilitates productivity through the provision of software which facilitates productivity through the provision of advanced search capabilities and the elimination of repetitive keying.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.171-196

Authors

Languages

Types

  • a 4897
  • m 511
  • el 208
  • s 206
  • b 46
  • x 35
  • i 23
  • r 22
  • ? 10
  • n 7
  • p 7
  • h 4
  • d 3
  • ag 2
  • l 2
  • u 2
  • z 2
  • au 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications