Search (21 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  • × theme_ss:"Register"
  1. Wool, G.: Filing and precoordination : how subject headings are displayed in online catalogs and why it matters (2000) 0.05 
    0.05281871 = product of:
  0.10563742 = sum of:
    0.10563742 = product of:
      0.21127485 = sum of:
        0.21127485 = weight(_text_:headings in 5612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.21127485 = score(doc=5612,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.24837378 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051211677 = queryNorm
            0.85063267 = fieldWeight in 5612, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5612)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Library of Congress Subjecl Headings retrieved as the results of a search in an online catalog are likely to be filed in straight alphabetical, word-by-word order, ignoring the semantic structures of these headings and scattering headings of a similar type. This practice makes LC headings unnecessarily difficult to use and negates much of their indexing power. Enthusiasm for filing simplicity and postcoordinate indexing are likely contributing factors to this phenomenon. Since the report Headings for Tomorrow (1992) first raised this issue, filing practices favoring postcoordination over precoordination appear to have become more widespread and more entrenched
    Source
    The LCSH century: one hundred years with the Library of Congress Subject Headings system. Ed.: A.T. Stone
  2. Ross, J.: ¬The impact of technology on indexing (2000) 0.03 
    0.0277539 = product of:
  0.0555078 = sum of:
    0.0555078 = product of:
      0.1110156 = sum of:
        0.1110156 = weight(_text_:22 in 263) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1110156 = score(doc=263,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17933457 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051211677 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 263, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=263)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.25-26
  3. Walker, A.: Indexing commonplace books : John Locke's method (2001) 0.03 
    0.0277539 = product of:
  0.0555078 = sum of:
    0.0555078 = product of:
      0.1110156 = sum of:
        0.1110156 = weight(_text_:22 in 13) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1110156 = score(doc=13,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17933457 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051211677 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 13, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=13)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.14-18
  4. Crystal, D.: Quote index unquote (2000) 0.03 
    0.0277539 = product of:
  0.0555078 = sum of:
    0.0555078 = product of:
      0.1110156 = sum of:
        0.1110156 = weight(_text_:22 in 487) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1110156 = score(doc=487,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17933457 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051211677 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 487, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=487)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.14-20
  5. Matthews, D.: Indexing published letters (2001) 0.03 
    0.0277539 = product of:
  0.0555078 = sum of:
    0.0555078 = product of:
      0.1110156 = sum of:
        0.1110156 = weight(_text_:22 in 4160) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1110156 = score(doc=4160,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17933457 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051211677 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4160, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4160)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.135-141
  6. Davis, M.: Building a global legal index : a work in progress (2001) 0.02 
    0.024284663 = product of:
  0.048569325 = sum of:
    0.048569325 = product of:
      0.09713865 = sum of:
        0.09713865 = weight(_text_:22 in 6443) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09713865 = score(doc=6443,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17933457 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051211677 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6443, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6443)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.123-127
  7. Browne, G.: ¬The definite article : acknowledging The in index entries (2001) 0.02 
    0.024284663 = product of:
  0.048569325 = sum of:
    0.048569325 = product of:
      0.09713865 = sum of:
        0.09713865 = weight(_text_:22 in 12) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09713865 = score(doc=12,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17933457 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051211677 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 12, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=12)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.119-122
  8. Weinberg, B.H.: Book indexes in France : medieval specimens and modern practices (2000) 0.02 
    0.024284663 = product of:
  0.048569325 = sum of:
    0.048569325 = product of:
      0.09713865 = sum of:
        0.09713865 = weight(_text_:22 in 486) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09713865 = score(doc=486,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17933457 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051211677 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 486, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=486)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.2-13
  9. Mauer, P.: Embedded indexing : pros and cons for the indexer (2000) 0.02 
    0.024284663 = product of:
  0.048569325 = sum of:
    0.048569325 = product of:
      0.09713865 = sum of:
        0.09713865 = weight(_text_:22 in 488) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09713865 = score(doc=488,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17933457 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051211677 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 488, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=488)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.27-28
  10. Anderson, C.R.: Indexing with a computer : past and present (2000) 0.02 
    0.024284663 = product of:
  0.048569325 = sum of:
    0.048569325 = product of:
      0.09713865 = sum of:
        0.09713865 = weight(_text_:22 in 489) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09713865 = score(doc=489,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17933457 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051211677 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 489, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=489)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.23-24
  11. Lee, D.: Judging indexes : the criteria for a good index (2001) 0.02 
    0.024284663 = product of:
  0.048569325 = sum of:
    0.048569325 = product of:
      0.09713865 = sum of:
        0.09713865 = weight(_text_:22 in 4162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09713865 = score(doc=4162,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17933457 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051211677 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4162, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4162)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2001) no.4, S.191-194
  12. Weinberg, B.H.: Predecessors of scientific indexing structures in the domain of religion (2001) 0.02 
    0.024284663 = product of:
  0.048569325 = sum of:
    0.048569325 = product of:
      0.09713865 = sum of:
        0.09713865 = weight(_text_:22 in 4172) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09713865 = score(doc=4172,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17933457 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051211677 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4172, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4172)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2001) no.4, S.178-180
  13. Weinberg, B.H.: Index structures in early Hebrew Biblical word lists : preludes to the first Latin concordances (2004) 0.02 
    0.024284663 = product of:
  0.048569325 = sum of:
    0.048569325 = product of:
      0.09713865 = sum of:
        0.09713865 = weight(_text_:22 in 4180) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09713865 = score(doc=4180,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17933457 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051211677 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4180, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4180)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    17.10.2005 13:54:22
  14. Olason, S.C.: Let's get usable! : Usability studies for indexes (2000) 0.02 
    0.01962497 = product of:
  0.03924994 = sum of:
    0.03924994 = product of:
      0.07849988 = sum of:
        0.07849988 = weight(_text_:22 in 882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07849988 = score(doc=882,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17933457 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051211677 = queryNorm
            0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 882, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=882)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Footnote
    Vgl.: http://www.theindexer.org/files/22-2-olason.pdf.
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2000) no.2, S.91-95
  15. Bell, H.K.: History of societies of indexing : part VII: 1992-95 (2000) 0.02 
    0.017346188 = product of:
  0.034692377 = sum of:
    0.034692377 = product of:
      0.06938475 = sum of:
        0.06938475 = weight(_text_:22 in 113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06938475 = score(doc=113,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17933457 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051211677 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 113, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=113)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2000) no.2, S.81-83
  16. Rooney, P.: How I reused my own index (2007) 0.01 
    0.01387695 = product of:
  0.0277539 = sum of:
    0.0277539 = product of:
      0.0555078 = sum of:
        0.0555078 = weight(_text_:22 in 737) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0555078 = score(doc=737,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17933457 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051211677 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 737, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=737)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    8.12.2007 18:41:22
  17. Dextre Clarke, S.G.: Evolution towards ISO 25964 : an international standard with guidelines for thesauri and other types of controlled vocabulary (2007) 0.01 
    0.012142331 = product of:
  0.024284663 = sum of:
    0.024284663 = product of:
      0.048569325 = sum of:
        0.048569325 = weight(_text_:22 in 749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048569325 = score(doc=749,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17933457 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051211677 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 749, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=749)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    8.12.2007 19:25:22
  18. Stauber, D.M.: Facing the text : content and structure in book indexing (2004) 0.01 
    0.011763662 = product of:
  0.023527324 = sum of:
    0.023527324 = product of:
      0.04705465 = sum of:
        0.04705465 = weight(_text_:headings in 5040) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04705465 = score(doc=5040,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.24837378 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051211677 = queryNorm
            0.18945095 = fieldWeight in 5040, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=5040)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Footnote
    She divides the topics within the text to be indexed into the categories of metatopics, local main topics, and ancillary topics, followed by subheadings. The indexability of individual topics at whatever level, and their wording, absorb other chapters. Linkages among the topics - cross-references and doubleposting - arc tracked in the chapter "Connections and Access." Finally, the mechanics of indexing are contained in "Process" and "Inside an Indexer's Brain" describes her own procedure and feelings as she indexes a book from beginning to end. When I initially faced the text of this book, I felt overwhelmed, even bewildered, by the plethora of terminology, much of it Stauber's own. Further, each chapter is divided into a complex array of headings, subheadings, sub-subheadings, and more. But when I read from beginning to end, all those pieces fell into place. Stauber develops her text logically, explaining each step of the way clearly, distinguishing each detail from others, and frequently linking passages to relevant others. At every stage in the book, she illustrates with copious examples from indexes she or others have compiled. In the case of her own indexes, she describes her thought processes, her initial reactions to what she read, her decisions regarding the use of particular topics and at what level, and of her chosen terminology; and also, and often, how and why she later changed her mind as she got further into the text. This forms a candid and detailed analysis of indexing, step by step, stage by stage, complex and subtle but with a perceptibly firm connecting structure. In short, she's a good writer.
    Facing the Text falls into what I call the third wave of books about back-of-the-book indexing. Each of these waves overlaps, but generally the first consists of the general manuals on indexing books (and other media): Booth, Knight, Mulvany, and Wellisch, along with chapter 18 of the Chicago Manual of Style, 15th ed. These set out the fundamental principles, conventions, or rules of indexing in a mostly impersonal, dispassionate tone. The second wave carried manuals on indexing in specific disciplines and genres: biography, medicine, law, psychology, history, genealogy, etc. The third wave, exemplified by Stauber's Facing the Text and Smith and Kells' Inside Indexing, delves into what goes through the mind of the indexer "facing the text" and putting together an index based on it. The tone is personal and subjective, the authors taking the reader through their own perceptions of the stages of indexing a book, the inevitable problems and subsequent decision making, expressed through their own reactions and reasoning. Facing the Text is not a manual where the newcomer to indexing can find immediate answers to specific problems: the first and second waves of books on indexing are designed to provide those. It's a book for the professional indexer or academic author indexing more than one book; its effect is to hone skills and refine working habits, to increase efficiency and effectiveness, to create indexes that make faithful, logical sense of the text. Newcomers, including first-time academic-author indexers, should begin with the last chapter "Inside an Indexer's Brain," then the second-to-last chapter, "Process"; in fact, I would suggest that any reader begin with "Inside an Indexer's Brain," for its introduction to the terminology and the overall look at indexing, from the first to the last page of the text to be indexed. As one would expect, the index to Facing the Text is comprehensive; in fact, exhaustive, and admirably detailed. The personable, conversational tone continues here, with entries such as "Subheadings/creating as you go" and "Notes to yourself." Of course, "Being stuck" is there as is, and also helpfully doubleposted as "Stuckness strategies." Finally, and on a relatively small note, this is a nicely designed book. Not only is it laid out for looks, it's laid out for use. The type is a friendly size, and the complex structure of headings, subheadings, and sub-subheadings is rendered immediately intelligible by the well-chosen fonts. My only criticism concerns the tightness of the binding; manuals should lie flat, without having to be anchored on each side with paperweights."
  19. Miksa, F.: ¬The DDC Relative Index (2006) 0.01 
    0.008673094 = product of:
  0.017346188 = sum of:
    0.017346188 = product of:
      0.034692377 = sum of:
        0.034692377 = weight(_text_:22 in 5775) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034692377 = score(doc=5775,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17933457 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051211677 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5775, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5775)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The "Relative Index" of the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) is investigated over the span of its lifetime in 22 editions of the DDC as to its character as a concept indexing system, its provision of conceptual contexts for the terms it lists, and the way in which the index intersects with special tables of categories used in the system. Striking features of the index that are discussed include how the locater function of an index is expressed in it, its practice of including concepts that have not been given specific notational locations in the system, its two methods of providing conceptual contexts for indexed terms (by means of the notation of the system and by the insertion of enhancement terms that portray conceptual context), and how the index has intersected with three types of special tables of categories in the system. Critical issues raised include the indexing of constructed or synthesized complex concepts, inconsistencies in how enhancement terms are portrayed and the absence of them in some instances, the problem of equating conceptual context with disciplinary context, and problems associated with not indexing one type of special table. Summary and conclusions are extended to problems that arise in studying the index.
  20. Booth, P.F.: Indexing : the manual of good practice (2001) 0.01 
    0.0066545317 = product of:
  0.013309063 = sum of:
    0.013309063 = product of:
      0.026618127 = sum of:
        0.026618127 = weight(_text_:headings in 1968) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026618127 = score(doc=1968,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24837378 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051211677 = queryNorm
            0.107169636 = fieldWeight in 1968, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=1968)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Footnote
    Rez. in: nfd - Information Wissenschaft und Praxis 54(2003) H.7, S.440-442 (R. Fugmann): "Das Buch beginnt mit dem Kapitel "Myths about Indexing" und mit der Nennung von weit verbreiteten Irrtümern über das Indexieren, und zwar vorrangig über das Registermachen. Mit einem einzigen Satz ist die Problematik treffend skizziert, welcher das Buch gewidmet ist: "With the development of electronic documents, it has become possible to store very large amounts of information; but storage is not of much use without the capability to retrieve, to convert, transfer and reuse the information". Kritisiert wird die weit verbreitet anzutreffende Ansicht, das Indexieren sei lediglich eine Sache vom "picking out words from the text or naming objects in images and using those words as index headings". Eine solche Arbeitsweise führt jedoch nicht zu Registern, sondern zu Konkordanzen (d.h. zu alphabetischen Fundstellenlisten für Textwörter) und"... is entirely dependent an the words themselves and is not concerned with the ideas behind them". Das Sammeln von Information ist einfach. Aber die (Wieder-) Auffindbarkeit herzustellen muss gelernt werden, wenn mehr ermöglicht werden soll als lediglich das Wiederfinden von Texten, die man in allen Einzelheiten noch genau in Erinnerung behalten hat (known-item searches, questions of recall), die Details der sprachlichen Ausdrucksweise für die gesuchten Begriffe eingeschlossen. Die Verfasserin beschreibt aus ihrer großen praktischen Erfahrung, welche Schritte hierzu auf der gedanklichen und technischen Ebene unternommen werden müssen. Zu den erstgenannten Schritten rechnet die Abtrennung von Details, welche nicht im Index vertreten sein sollten ("unsought terms"), weil sie mit Sicherheit kein Suchziel darstellen werden und als "false friends" zur Überflutung des Suchenden mit Nebensächlichkeiten führen würden, eine Entscheidung, welche nur mit guter Sachkenntnis gefällt werden kann. All Dasjenige hingegen, was in Gegenwart und Zukunft (!) ein sinnvolles Suchziel darstellen könnte und "sufficiently informative" ist, verdient ein Schlagwort im Register. Man lernt auch durch lehrreiche Beispiele, wodurch ein Textwort unbrauchbar für das Register wird, wenn es dort als (schlechtes) Schlagwort erscheint, herausgelöst aus dem interpretierenden Zusammenhang, in welchen es im Text eingebettet gewesen ist. Auch muss die Vieldeutigkeit bereinigt werden, die fast jedem natursprachigen Wort anhaftet. Sonst wird der Suchende beim Nachschlagen allzu oft in die Irre geführt, und zwar um so öfter, je größer ein diesbezüglich unbereinigter Speicher bereits geworden ist.

Authors

Languages

  • e 20
  • d 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 19
  • m 2

Themes