Search (27 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Internet"
  • × type_ss:"el"
  1. Blosser, J.; Michaelson, R.; Routh. R.; Xia, P.: Defining the landscape of Web resources : Concluding Report of the BAER Web Resources Sub-Group (2000) 0.03
    0.031158837 = product of:
      0.062317673 = sum of:
        0.054472968 = weight(_text_:processing in 1447) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.054472968 = score(doc=1447,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.175792 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043425296 = queryNorm
            0.30987173 = fieldWeight in 1447, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1447)
        0.007844705 = product of:
          0.023534114 = sum of:
            0.023534114 = weight(_text_:22 in 1447) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023534114 = score(doc=1447,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15206799 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043425296 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1447, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1447)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    The BAER Web Resources Group was charged in October 1999 with defining and describing the parameters of electronic resources that do not clearly belong to the categories being defined by the BAER Digital Group or the BAER Electronic Journals Group. After some difficulty identifying precisely which resources fell under the Group's charge, we finally named the following types of resources for our consideration: web sites, electronic texts, indexes, databases and abstracts, online reference resources, and networked and non-networked CD-ROMs. Electronic resources are a vast and growing collection that touch nearly every department within the Library. It is unrealistic to think one department can effectively administer all aspects of the collection. The Group then began to focus on the concern of bibliographic access to these varied resources, and to define parameters for handling or processing them within the Library. Some key elements became evident as the work progressed. * Selection process of resources to be acquired for the collection * Duplication of effort * Use of CORC * Resource Finder design * Maintenance of Resource Finder * CD-ROMs not networked * Communications * Voyager search limitations. An unexpected collaboration with the Web Development Committee on the Resource Finder helped to steer the Group to more detailed descriptions of bibliographic access. This collaboration included development of data elements for the Resource Finder database, and some discussions on Library staff processing of the resources. The Web Resources Group invited expert testimony to help the Group broaden its view to envision public use of the resources and discuss concerns related to technical services processing. The first testimony came from members of the Resource Finder Committee. Some background information on the Web Development Resource Finder Committee was shared. The second testimony was from librarians who select electronic texts. Three main themes were addressed: accessing CD-ROMs; the issue of including non-networked CD-ROMs in the Resource Finder; and, some special concerns about electronic texts. The third testimony came from librarians who select indexes and abstracts and also provide Reference services. Appendices to this report include minutes of the meetings with the experts (Appendix A), a list of proposed data elements to be used in the Resource Finder (Appendix B), and recommendations made to the Resource Finder Committee (Appendix C). Below are summaries of the key elements.
    Date
    21. 4.2002 10:22:31
  2. Landwehr, A.: China schafft digitales Punktesystem für den "besseren" Menschen (2018) 0.02
    0.01576062 = product of:
      0.06304248 = sum of:
        0.06304248 = product of:
          0.09456371 = sum of:
            0.047495477 = weight(_text_:29 in 4314) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047495477 = score(doc=4314,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15275662 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043425296 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 4314, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4314)
            0.047068227 = weight(_text_:22 in 4314) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047068227 = score(doc=4314,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15206799 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043425296 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4314, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4314)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2018 14:29:46
  3. Networked knowledge organization systems (2001) 0.01
    0.011793743 = product of:
      0.04717497 = sum of:
        0.04717497 = weight(_text_:processing in 6473) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04717497 = score(doc=6473,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.175792 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043425296 = queryNorm
            0.26835677 = fieldWeight in 6473, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6473)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Knowledge Organization Systems can comprise thesauri and other controlled lists of keywords, ontologies, classification systems, clustering approaches, taxonomies, gazetteers, dictionaries, lexical databases, concept maps/spaces, semantic road maps, etc. These schemas enable knowledge structuring and management, knowledge-based data processing and systematic access to knowledge structures in individual collections and digital libraries. Used as interactive information services on the Internet they have an increased potential to support the description, discovery and retrieval of heterogeneous information resources and to contribute to an overall resource discovery infrastructure
  4. Weber, S.: Kommen nach den "science wars" die "reference wars"? : Wandel der Wissenskultur durch Netzplagiate und das Google-Wikipedia-Monopol (2005) 0.01
    0.010810301 = product of:
      0.043241203 = sum of:
        0.043241203 = product of:
          0.064861804 = sum of:
            0.023303263 = weight(_text_:science in 4023) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023303263 = score(doc=4023,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11438741 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043425296 = queryNorm
                0.20372227 = fieldWeight in 4023, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4023)
            0.04155854 = weight(_text_:29 in 4023) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04155854 = score(doc=4023,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15275662 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043425296 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 4023, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4023)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    29. 9.2005 17:18:36
  5. Ask me[@sk.me]: your global information guide : der Wegweiser durch die Informationswelten (1996) 0.01
    0.007844705 = product of:
      0.03137882 = sum of:
        0.03137882 = product of:
          0.094136454 = sum of:
            0.094136454 = weight(_text_:22 in 5837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.094136454 = score(doc=5837,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15206799 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043425296 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 5837, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5837)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    30.11.1996 13:22:37
  6. Sadun, E.: ¬Die JavaScript CD (1996) 0.01
    0.006926424 = product of:
      0.027705695 = sum of:
        0.027705695 = product of:
          0.08311708 = sum of:
            0.08311708 = weight(_text_:29 in 3900) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08311708 = score(doc=3900,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15275662 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043425296 = queryNorm
                0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 3900, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3900)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    1. 3.2008 17:29:00
  7. Lange, H.: Wissensdatenbanken im Netz : Internetrecherche für das Projekt EFIL (2000) 0.01
    0.005936935 = product of:
      0.02374774 = sum of:
        0.02374774 = product of:
          0.07124322 = sum of:
            0.07124322 = weight(_text_:29 in 6475) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07124322 = score(doc=6475,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15275662 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043425296 = queryNorm
                0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 6475, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6475)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    15. 8.2001 10:29:54
  8. Rudner, L.: Who is going to mine digital library resources? : anf how? (2000) 0.01
    0.005936935 = product of:
      0.02374774 = sum of:
        0.02374774 = product of:
          0.07124322 = sum of:
            0.07124322 = weight(_text_:29 in 6800) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07124322 = score(doc=6800,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15275662 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043425296 = queryNorm
                0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 6800, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6800)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    26.12.2011 16:38:29
  9. Schmidt, J.; Horn, A.; Thorsen, B.: Australian Subject Gateways, the successes and the challenges (2003) 0.01
    0.005936935 = product of:
      0.02374774 = sum of:
        0.02374774 = product of:
          0.07124322 = sum of:
            0.07124322 = weight(_text_:29 in 1745) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07124322 = score(doc=1745,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15275662 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043425296 = queryNorm
                0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 1745, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1745)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    26.12.2011 12:46:29
  10. OWLED 2009; OWL: Experiences and Directions, Sixth International Workshop, Chantilly, Virginia, USA, 23-24 October 2009, Co-located with ISWC 2009. (2009) 0.01
    0.0058968714 = product of:
      0.023587486 = sum of:
        0.023587486 = weight(_text_:processing in 3391) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023587486 = score(doc=3391,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.175792 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043425296 = queryNorm
            0.13417839 = fieldWeight in 3391, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3391)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Content
    Long Papers * Suggestions for OWL 3, Pascal Hitzler. * BestMap: Context-Aware SKOS Vocabulary Mappings in OWL 2, Rinke Hoekstra. * Mechanisms for Importing Modules, Bijan Parsia, Ulrike Sattler and Thomas Schneider. * A Syntax for Rules in OWL 2, Birte Glimm, Matthew Horridge, Bijan Parsia and Peter Patel-Schneider. * PelletSpatial: A Hybrid RCC-8 and RDF/OWL Reasoning and Query Engine, Markus Stocker and Evren Sirin. * The OWL API: A Java API for Working with OWL 2 Ontologies, Matthew Horridge and Sean Bechhofer. * From Justifications to Proofs for Entailments in OWL, Matthew Horridge, Bijan Parsia and Ulrike Sattler. * A Solution for the Man-Man Problem in the Family History Knowledge Base, Dmitry Tsarkov, Ulrike Sattler and Robert Stevens. * Towards Integrity Constraints in OWL, Evren Sirin and Jiao Tao. * Processing OWL2 ontologies using Thea: An application of logic programming, Vangelis Vassiliadis, Jan Wielemaker and Chris Mungall. * Reasoning in Metamodeling Enabled Ontologies, Nophadol Jekjantuk, Gerd Gröner and Jeff Z. Pan.
  11. Schultz, S.: ¬Die eine App für alles : Mobile Zukunft in China (2016) 0.01
    0.005547044 = product of:
      0.022188175 = sum of:
        0.022188175 = product of:
          0.06656452 = sum of:
            0.06656452 = weight(_text_:22 in 4313) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06656452 = score(doc=4313,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15206799 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043425296 = queryNorm
                0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 4313, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4313)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2018 14:22:02
  12. Strittmatter, K.: Chinas digitaler Plan für den besseren Menschen (2017) 0.00
    0.0049474463 = product of:
      0.019789785 = sum of:
        0.019789785 = product of:
          0.05936935 = sum of:
            0.05936935 = weight(_text_:29 in 2114) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05936935 = score(doc=2114,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15275662 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043425296 = queryNorm
                0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 2114, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2114)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    19. 9.2017 14:45:29
  13. Ding, J.: Can data die? : why one of the Internet's oldest images lives on wirhout its subjects's consent (2021) 0.00
    0.00491406 = product of:
      0.01965624 = sum of:
        0.01965624 = weight(_text_:processing in 423) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01965624 = score(doc=423,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.175792 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043425296 = queryNorm
            0.111815326 = fieldWeight in 423, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=423)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Lena Forsén, the real human behind the Lenna image, was first published in Playboy in 1972. Soon after, USC engineers searching for a suitable test image for their image processing research sought inspiration from the magazine. They deemed Lenna the right fit and scanned the image into digital, RGB existence. From here, the story of the image follows the story of the internet. Lenna was one of the first inhabitants of ARPANet, the internet's predecessor, and then the world wide web. While the image's reach was limited to a few research papers in the '70s and '80s, in 1991, Lenna was featured on the cover of an engineering journal alongside another popular test image, Peppers. This caught the attention of Playboy, which threatened a copyright infringement lawsuit. Engineers who had grown attached to Lenna fought back. Ultimately, they prevailed, and as a Playboy VP reflected on the drama: "We decided we should exploit this because it is a phenomenon." The Playboy controversy canonized Lenna in engineering folklore and prompted an explosion of conversation about the image. Image hits on the internet rose to a peak number in 1995.
  14. Wesch, M.: Web 2.0 ... The Machine is Us/ing Us (2006) 0.00
    0.0039223526 = product of:
      0.01568941 = sum of:
        0.01568941 = product of:
          0.047068227 = sum of:
            0.047068227 = weight(_text_:22 in 3478) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047068227 = score(doc=3478,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15206799 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043425296 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3478, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3478)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    5. 1.2008 19:22:48
  15. Schrenk, P.: Gesamtnote 1 für Signal - Telegram-Defizite bei Sicherheit und Privatsphäre : Signal und Telegram im Test (2022) 0.00
    0.0039223526 = product of:
      0.01568941 = sum of:
        0.01568941 = product of:
          0.047068227 = sum of:
            0.047068227 = weight(_text_:22 in 486) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047068227 = score(doc=486,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15206799 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043425296 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 486, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=486)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2022 14:01:14
  16. Schneider, R.: Bibliothek 1.0, 2.0 oder 3.0? (2008) 0.00
    0.0034320583 = product of:
      0.013728233 = sum of:
        0.013728233 = product of:
          0.041184697 = sum of:
            0.041184697 = weight(_text_:22 in 6122) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041184697 = score(doc=6122,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15206799 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043425296 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6122, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6122)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Noch ist nicht entschieden mit welcher Vehemenz das sogenannte Web 2.0 die Bibliotheken verändern wird. Allerdings wird hier und da bereits mit Bezugnahme auf das sogenannte Semantic Web von einer dritten und mancherorts von einer vierten Generation des Web gesprochen. Der Vortrag hinterfragt kritisch, welche Konzepte sich hinter diesen Bezeichnungen verbergen und geht der Frage nach, welche Herausforderungen eine Übernahme dieser Konzepte für die Bibliothekswelt mit sich bringen würde. Vgl. insbes. Folie 22 mit einer Darstellung von der Entwicklung vom Web 1.0 zum Web 4.0
  17. Schetsche, M.: ¬Die ergoogelte Wirklichkeit : Verschwörungstheorien und das Internet (2005) 0.00
    0.002941764 = product of:
      0.011767056 = sum of:
        0.011767056 = product of:
          0.035301168 = sum of:
            0.035301168 = weight(_text_:22 in 3397) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035301168 = score(doc=3397,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15206799 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043425296 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3397, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3397)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    "Zweimal täglich googeln" empfiehlt Mathias Bröckers in seinem Buch "Verschwörungen, Verschwörungstheorien und die Geheimnisse des 11.9.". Der Band gilt den gutbürgerlichen Medien von FAZ bis Spiegel als Musterbeispiel krankhafter Verschwörungstheorie. Dabei wollte der Autor - nach eigenem Bekunden - keine Verschwörungstheorie zum 11. September vorlegen, sondern lediglich auf Widersprüche und Fragwürdigkeiten in den amtlichen Darstellungen und Erklärungen der US-Regierung zu jenem Terroranschlag hinweisen. Unabhängig davon, wie ernst diese Einlassungen des Autors zu nehmen sind, ist der "Fall Bröckers" für die Erforschung von Verschwörungstheorien unter zwei Aspekten interessant: Erstens geht der Band auf ein [[extern] ] konspirologisches Tagebuch zurück, das der Autor zwischen dem 13. September 2001 und dem 22. März 2002 für das Online-Magazin Telepolis verfasst hat; zweitens behauptet Bröckers in der Einleitung zum Buch, dass er für seine Arbeit ausschließlich über das Netz zugängliche Quellen genutzt habe. Hierbei hätte ihm Google unverzichtbare Dienste geleistet: Um an die Informationen in diesem Buch zu kommen, musste ich weder über besondere Beziehungen verfügen, noch mich mit Schlapphüten und Turbanträgern zu klandestinen Treffen verabreden - alle Quellen liegen offen. Sie zu finden, leistete mir die Internet-Suchmaschine Google unschätzbare Dienste. Mathias Bröckers
  18. Firnkes, M.: Schöne neue Welt : der Content der Zukunft wird von Algorithmen bestimmt (2015) 0.00
    0.002941764 = product of:
      0.011767056 = sum of:
        0.011767056 = product of:
          0.035301168 = sum of:
            0.035301168 = weight(_text_:22 in 2118) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035301168 = score(doc=2118,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15206799 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043425296 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2118, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2118)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    5. 7.2015 22:02:31
  19. Subramanian, S.; Shafer, K.E.: Clustering (1998) 0.00
    0.002774198 = product of:
      0.011096792 = sum of:
        0.011096792 = product of:
          0.033290375 = sum of:
            0.033290375 = weight(_text_:science in 1103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.033290375 = score(doc=1103,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11438741 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043425296 = queryNorm
                0.2910318 = fieldWeight in 1103, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1103)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    This article presents our exploration of computer science clustering algorithms as they relate to the Scorpion system. Scorpion is a research project at OCLC that explores the indexing and cataloging of electronic resources. For a more complete description of the Scorpion, please visit the Scorpion Web site at <http://purl.oclc.org/scorpion>
  20. Shafer, K.E.: Evaluating Scorpion results (1998) 0.00
    0.002774198 = product of:
      0.011096792 = sum of:
        0.011096792 = product of:
          0.033290375 = sum of:
            0.033290375 = weight(_text_:science in 1569) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.033290375 = score(doc=1569,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11438741 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043425296 = queryNorm
                0.2910318 = fieldWeight in 1569, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1569)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Scorpion is a research project at OCLC that builds tools for automatic subject assignment by combining library science and information retrieval techniques. A thesis of Scorpion is that the Dewey Decimal Classification (Dewey) can be used to perform automatic subject assignment for electronic items.