Search (24 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Register"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Rowland, M.J.: <Meta> tags (2000) 0.08
    0.07516497 = product of:
      0.112747446 = sum of:
        0.06973162 = weight(_text_:search in 222) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06973162 = score(doc=222,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.1747324 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05027291 = queryNorm
            0.39907667 = fieldWeight in 222, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=222)
        0.043015826 = product of:
          0.08603165 = sum of:
            0.08603165 = weight(_text_:engines in 222) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08603165 = score(doc=222,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.25542772 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05027291 = queryNorm
                0.33681408 = fieldWeight in 222, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=222)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    <META> tags are used to create meta-information, or information about the information in a Web site. There are many types of <META> tags, but those most relevant to indexing are the description and keyword tags. Description tags provide a short summary of the site contents that are often displayed by search engines when they list search results. Keyword tags are used to define words or phrases that someone using a search engine might use to look for relevant sites. <META> tags are of interest to indexers for two reasons. They provide a means of making your indexing business Web site more visible to those searching the Web for indexing services, and they offer indexers a potential new source of work: writing keyword and description tags for Web site developers and companies with Web sites. <META> tag writing makes good use of an indexer's ability to choose relevant key terms, and the closely related skill of abstracting: conveying the essence of a document in a sentence or two.
  2. Broccoli, K.; Ravenswaay, G.V.: Web indexing : anchors away! (2000) 0.06
    0.05551693 = product of:
      0.08327539 = sum of:
        0.04025957 = weight(_text_:search in 219) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04025957 = score(doc=219,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1747324 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05027291 = queryNorm
            0.230407 = fieldWeight in 219, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=219)
        0.043015826 = product of:
          0.08603165 = sum of:
            0.08603165 = weight(_text_:engines in 219) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08603165 = score(doc=219,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.25542772 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05027291 = queryNorm
                0.33681408 = fieldWeight in 219, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=219)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    In this chapter we turn to embedded indexing for the Internet, frequently called Web indexing. We will define Web indexes; describe the structure of entries for Web indexes; present some of the challenges that Web indexers face; and compare Web indexes to search engines. One of the difficulties in defining Web indexes is their relative newness. The first pages were placed on the World Wide Web in 1991 when Tim Berners Lee, its founder, uploaded four files. We are in a period of transition, moving from using well-established forms of writing and communications to others that are still in their infancy. Paramount among these is the Web. For indexers, this is an uncharted voyage where we must jettison firmly established ideas while developing new ones. Where the voyage will end is anyone's guess.
  3. Ross, J.: ¬The impact of technology on indexing (2000) 0.02
    0.01816343 = product of:
      0.054490287 = sum of:
        0.054490287 = product of:
          0.10898057 = sum of:
            0.10898057 = weight(_text_:22 in 263) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10898057 = score(doc=263,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17604718 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05027291 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 263, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=263)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.25-26
  4. Walker, A.: Indexing commonplace books : John Locke's method (2001) 0.02
    0.01816343 = product of:
      0.054490287 = sum of:
        0.054490287 = product of:
          0.10898057 = sum of:
            0.10898057 = weight(_text_:22 in 13) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10898057 = score(doc=13,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17604718 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05027291 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 13, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=13)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.14-18
  5. Crystal, D.: Quote index unquote (2000) 0.02
    0.01816343 = product of:
      0.054490287 = sum of:
        0.054490287 = product of:
          0.10898057 = sum of:
            0.10898057 = weight(_text_:22 in 487) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10898057 = score(doc=487,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17604718 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05027291 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 487, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=487)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.14-20
  6. Matthews, D.: Indexing published letters (2001) 0.02
    0.01816343 = product of:
      0.054490287 = sum of:
        0.054490287 = product of:
          0.10898057 = sum of:
            0.10898057 = weight(_text_:22 in 4160) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10898057 = score(doc=4160,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17604718 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05027291 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4160, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4160)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.135-141
  7. Davis, M.: Building a global legal index : a work in progress (2001) 0.02
    0.015893001 = product of:
      0.047679 = sum of:
        0.047679 = product of:
          0.095358 = sum of:
            0.095358 = weight(_text_:22 in 6443) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.095358 = score(doc=6443,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17604718 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05027291 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6443, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6443)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.123-127
  8. Browne, G.: ¬The definite article : acknowledging The in index entries (2001) 0.02
    0.015893001 = product of:
      0.047679 = sum of:
        0.047679 = product of:
          0.095358 = sum of:
            0.095358 = weight(_text_:22 in 12) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.095358 = score(doc=12,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17604718 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05027291 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 12, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=12)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.119-122
  9. Weinberg, B.H.: Book indexes in France : medieval specimens and modern practices (2000) 0.02
    0.015893001 = product of:
      0.047679 = sum of:
        0.047679 = product of:
          0.095358 = sum of:
            0.095358 = weight(_text_:22 in 486) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.095358 = score(doc=486,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17604718 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05027291 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 486, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=486)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.2-13
  10. Mauer, P.: Embedded indexing : pros and cons for the indexer (2000) 0.02
    0.015893001 = product of:
      0.047679 = sum of:
        0.047679 = product of:
          0.095358 = sum of:
            0.095358 = weight(_text_:22 in 488) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.095358 = score(doc=488,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17604718 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05027291 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 488, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=488)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.27-28
  11. Anderson, C.R.: Indexing with a computer : past and present (2000) 0.02
    0.015893001 = product of:
      0.047679 = sum of:
        0.047679 = product of:
          0.095358 = sum of:
            0.095358 = weight(_text_:22 in 489) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.095358 = score(doc=489,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17604718 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05027291 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 489, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=489)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.23-24
  12. Lee, D.: Judging indexes : the criteria for a good index (2001) 0.02
    0.015893001 = product of:
      0.047679 = sum of:
        0.047679 = product of:
          0.095358 = sum of:
            0.095358 = weight(_text_:22 in 4162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.095358 = score(doc=4162,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17604718 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05027291 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4162, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4162)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2001) no.4, S.191-194
  13. Weinberg, B.H.: Predecessors of scientific indexing structures in the domain of religion (2001) 0.02
    0.015893001 = product of:
      0.047679 = sum of:
        0.047679 = product of:
          0.095358 = sum of:
            0.095358 = weight(_text_:22 in 4172) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.095358 = score(doc=4172,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17604718 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05027291 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4172, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4172)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2001) no.4, S.178-180
  14. Weinberg, B.H.: Index structures in early Hebrew Biblical word lists : preludes to the first Latin concordances (2004) 0.02
    0.015893001 = product of:
      0.047679 = sum of:
        0.047679 = product of:
          0.095358 = sum of:
            0.095358 = weight(_text_:22 in 4180) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.095358 = score(doc=4180,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17604718 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05027291 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4180, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4180)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    17.10.2005 13:54:22
  15. MacDougall, S.: Signposts on the information superhighway : indexes and access (2000) 0.02
    0.015656501 = product of:
      0.0469695 = sum of:
        0.0469695 = weight(_text_:search in 6106) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0469695 = score(doc=6106,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1747324 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05027291 = queryNorm
            0.2688082 = fieldWeight in 6106, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6106)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Users of the Information Superhighway need signposts to find their way to appropriate, accurate and current information. Given the sheer quantity of information, intellectual indexing is more relevant than ever, complementing and augmenting automatic keyword indexing. Signposts come in various forms including browser bookmarks, local, on-site and remote lists, indexes and directories, temporary search engine results, and metadata. The considerable body of theory on vocabulary control for online database searching can be adapted to index construction for the Internet. At the same time, there are unresolved issues concerning information quality, indexing decisions, and standards
  16. Wool, G.: Filing and precoordination : how subject headings are displayed in online catalogs and why it matters (2000) 0.01
    0.013419857 = product of:
      0.04025957 = sum of:
        0.04025957 = weight(_text_:search in 5612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04025957 = score(doc=5612,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1747324 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05027291 = queryNorm
            0.230407 = fieldWeight in 5612, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5612)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Library of Congress Subjecl Headings retrieved as the results of a search in an online catalog are likely to be filed in straight alphabetical, word-by-word order, ignoring the semantic structures of these headings and scattering headings of a similar type. This practice makes LC headings unnecessarily difficult to use and negates much of their indexing power. Enthusiasm for filing simplicity and postcoordinate indexing are likely contributing factors to this phenomenon. Since the report Headings for Tomorrow (1992) first raised this issue, filing practices favoring postcoordination over precoordination appear to have become more widespread and more entrenched
  17. Olason, S.C.: Let's get usable! : Usability studies for indexes (2000) 0.01
    0.012843484 = product of:
      0.03853045 = sum of:
        0.03853045 = product of:
          0.0770609 = sum of:
            0.0770609 = weight(_text_:22 in 882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0770609 = score(doc=882,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17604718 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05027291 = queryNorm
                0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 882, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=882)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Footnote
    Vgl.: http://www.theindexer.org/files/22-2-olason.pdf.
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2000) no.2, S.91-95
  18. Bell, H.K.: History of societies of indexing : part VII: 1992-95 (2000) 0.01
    0.011352143 = product of:
      0.03405643 = sum of:
        0.03405643 = product of:
          0.06811286 = sum of:
            0.06811286 = weight(_text_:22 in 113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06811286 = score(doc=113,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17604718 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05027291 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 113, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=113)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2000) no.2, S.81-83
  19. Rowland, M.J.: Web site design for indexers (2000) 0.01
    0.011183213 = product of:
      0.03354964 = sum of:
        0.03354964 = weight(_text_:search in 225) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03354964 = score(doc=225,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1747324 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05027291 = queryNorm
            0.19200584 = fieldWeight in 225, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=225)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Do indexers really need Web sites? No, they do not. Indexers do not need computers either. Indexes can be done on cards; networking can be done at conferences; and marketing can be done with cold calls. But, just as email has become indispensable to communication, and computers have become essential to indexing, so Web sites have become more and more necessary for all types of businesses, particularly small companies with small advertising budgets, like indexing businesses. The amount of business being conducted on the Web is increasing exponentially. Publishers, packagers, and other potential clients are beginning to search the Web for indexers. Why not participate in e-commerce, the newest way of doing business? A good Web site not only helps you obtain work, it increases your professional reputation and helps you influence the future of indexing. You can use your site as an online resume, to display a list of all the books you have indexed in the past year, to provide examples of your work, and to network with others. You can use it to express your philosophy of indexing, to teach others about indexing, and to make your voice heard on issues affecting the indexing profession. Not all indexers need Web sites, but active, involved, and far-sighted indexers, like you, do!
  20. Rooney, P.: How I reused my own index (2007) 0.01
    0.009081715 = product of:
      0.027245143 = sum of:
        0.027245143 = product of:
          0.054490287 = sum of:
            0.054490287 = weight(_text_:22 in 737) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054490287 = score(doc=737,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17604718 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05027291 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 737, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=737)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    8.12.2007 18:41:22