-
Sauperl, A.; Saye, J.D.: Have we made any progress? : catalogues of the future revisited (2009)
0.04
0.043771923 = product of:
0.087543845 = sum of:
0.069554016 = weight(_text_:sites in 2843) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.069554016 = score(doc=2843,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2408473 = queryWeight, product of:
5.227637 = idf(docFreq=644, maxDocs=44218)
0.046071928 = queryNorm
0.28878886 = fieldWeight in 2843, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.227637 = idf(docFreq=644, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2843)
0.01798983 = product of:
0.03597966 = sum of:
0.03597966 = weight(_text_:design in 2843) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03597966 = score(doc=2843,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17322445 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7598698 = idf(docFreq=2798, maxDocs=44218)
0.046071928 = queryNorm
0.20770542 = fieldWeight in 2843, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7598698 = idf(docFreq=2798, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2843)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Purpose - Library online public access catalogues (OPACs) are considered to be unattractive in comparison with popular internet sites. In 2000, the authors presented some suggestions on how library catalogues should change. Have librarians actually made their OPACs more user-friendly by adopting techniques and technologies already present in other information resources? This paper aims to address these issues. Design/methodology/approach - The characteristics of four OPACs, one online bookstore and two internet search engines are analyzed. The paper reviews some of the changes and directions suggested by researchers and adds some of authors own. All this is in the hope that library catalogues will survive "Google attack." Findings - Changes are identified in the information services studied over a seven-year period. Least development is found in library catalogues. Suggestions are made for library catalogues of the future. Research limitations/implications - A library catalogue, a web search engine and an internet bookstore cannot be compared directly because of differences in scope. But features from each could be fruitfully used in others. Practical implications - OPACs must be both attractive and useful. They should be at least as easy to use as their competitors. With the results of research as well as the knowledge librarians have many years, the profession should be able to develop better OPACs than we have today and regain lost ground in the "competition" for those with information needs. Originality/value - A comparison of OPAC features in 2000 and 2007, even if subjective, can provide a panoramic view of the development of the field.
-
Eversberg, B.: Wie sagt man's dem Benutzer? : Bemerkungen zur öffentlichen Sprache der Bibliotheken (2002)
0.04
0.03501754 = product of:
0.07003508 = sum of:
0.055643216 = weight(_text_:sites in 1096) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055643216 = score(doc=1096,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2408473 = queryWeight, product of:
5.227637 = idf(docFreq=644, maxDocs=44218)
0.046071928 = queryNorm
0.23103109 = fieldWeight in 1096, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.227637 = idf(docFreq=644, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1096)
0.014391863 = product of:
0.028783726 = sum of:
0.028783726 = weight(_text_:design in 1096) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028783726 = score(doc=1096,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17322445 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7598698 = idf(docFreq=2798, maxDocs=44218)
0.046071928 = queryNorm
0.16616434 = fieldWeight in 1096, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7598698 = idf(docFreq=2798, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1096)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Bibliotheken können heute im World Wide Web ein größeres Publikum "ansprechen" als jemals zuvor. Seit längerem war aufgefallen, dass Bibliotheken in ihren Web-Angeboten sprachlich und vor allem terminologisch durchaus uneinheitlich auftreten. Es erscheint wünschenswert, dass Bibliotheken trotz aller äußerlichen Unterschiede des Erscheinungsbildes (Homepage-Design) nicht als einzelne, unverbundene Einrichtungen wahrgenommen werden, sondern dass Gemeinsamkeiten hervortreten, durch die sich Bibliotheken von anderen Anbietern im Web unterscheiden. Dazu gehört eine gemeinsame Terminologie und ein sprachliches Niveau, das zeitgemäßen Erwartungen entspricht, ohne aufdringlich zu sein, und das die Waage hält zwischen unangemessen vergröbernder Popularisierung oder oberflächlichem Marktschreiertum und dem zwar präzisen, aber für Außenstehende unzugänglichen Fachjargon. Von Anbeginn sollte man sich auch über dieses im Klaren sein: es gibt auch anspruchsvolle Benutzer, die ein auch in sprachlicher Hinsicht niveauvolles Angebot zu schätzen wissen. Werden sie uns ernst nehmen, wenn wir einseitig eine Annäherung an ein möglichst niedriges Niveau versuchen, mit der allzu deutlich durchscheinenden Bemühung, "alles ganz einfach" zu machen? Ursache für einen großen Teil der Divergenzen im Sprachgebrauch ist sicherlich die "Modernisierung". Bibliotheken stellen sich neuen Herausforderungen, aber die Sprache hält nicht immer Schritt (sondern bleibt zu stark buchbezogen) oder wagt sich zu weit vor auf noch unsicheres Terrain (erkennbar meist an einem Übermaß an Neologismen, insbesondere Anglizismen). Modewörter erkennt man nicht immer sofort als solche, aber der Bedarf für neue Ausdrucksmöglichkeiten kann nicht ignoriert werden. Es besteht jedoch ein Dilemma: Bibliotheken haben nicht die Art von "Ausstrahlung", Autorität oder Präsenz im öffentlichen Raum, die sprachliche Impulse geben kann. Davon sind sie weit entfernt, darüber verfügen heute wohl nur die Medien und die Werbung. Nur vereintes, einvernehmliches und einheitliches Vorgehen könnte die Chancen geringfügig vergrößern: eine konsistent verwendete und durchdachte Terminologie kann immerhin einen Wiedererkennungswert erreichen und den Bibliothekskontext als ein größeres Ganzes erlebbar machen.
- Footnote
- Teil eines Heftschwerpunktes: 'Bibliothekarische Web-Sites'
-
Frâncu, V.: ¬An interpretation of the FRBR model (2004)
0.03
0.03406372 = product of:
0.06812744 = sum of:
0.055643216 = weight(_text_:sites in 2647) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055643216 = score(doc=2647,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2408473 = queryWeight, product of:
5.227637 = idf(docFreq=644, maxDocs=44218)
0.046071928 = queryNorm
0.23103109 = fieldWeight in 2647, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.227637 = idf(docFreq=644, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2647)
0.012484221 = product of:
0.024968442 = sum of:
0.024968442 = weight(_text_:22 in 2647) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024968442 = score(doc=2647,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16133605 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046071928 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2647, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2647)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Content
- 1. Introduction With the diversification of the material available in library collections such as: music, film, 3D objects, cartographic material and electronic resources like CD-ROMS and Web sites, the existing cataloguing principles and codes are no longer adequate to enable the user to find, identify, select and obtain a particular entity. The problem is not only that material fails to be appropriately represented in the catalogue records but also access to such material, or parts of it, is difficult if possible at all. Consequently, the need emerged to develop new rules and build up a new conceptual model able to cope with all the requirements demanded by the existing library material. The Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records developed by an IFLA Study Group from 1992 through 1997 present a generalised view of the bibliographic universe and are intended to be independent of any cataloguing code or implementation (Tillett, 2002). Outstanding scholars like Antonio Panizzi, Charles A. Cutter and Seymour Lubetzky formulated the basic cataloguing principles of which some can be retrieved, as Denton (2003) argues as updated versions, between the basic lines of the FRBR model: - the relation work-author groups all the works of an author - all the editions, translations, adaptations of a work are clearly separated (as expressions and manifestations) - all the expressions and manifestations of a work are collocated with their related works in bibliographic families - any document (manifestation and item) can be found if the author, title or subject of that document is known - the author is authorised by the authority control - the title is an intrinsic part of the work + authority control entity
- Date
- 17. 6.2015 14:40:22
-
DeZelar-Tiedman, V.: Doing the LibraryThing(TM) in an academic library catalog (2008)
0.03
0.03406372 = product of:
0.06812744 = sum of:
0.055643216 = weight(_text_:sites in 2666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055643216 = score(doc=2666,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2408473 = queryWeight, product of:
5.227637 = idf(docFreq=644, maxDocs=44218)
0.046071928 = queryNorm
0.23103109 = fieldWeight in 2666, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.227637 = idf(docFreq=644, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2666)
0.012484221 = product of:
0.024968442 = sum of:
0.024968442 = weight(_text_:22 in 2666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024968442 = score(doc=2666,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16133605 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046071928 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2666, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2666)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Many libraries and other cultural institutions are incorporating Web 2.0 features and enhanced metadata into their catalogs (Trant 2006). These value-added elements include those typically found in commercial and social networking sites, such as book jacket images, reviews, and usergenerated tags. One such site that libraries are exploring as a model is LibraryThing (www.librarything.com) LibraryThing is a social networking site that allows users to "catalog" their own book collections. Members can add tags and reviews to records for books, as well as engage in online discussions. In addition to its service for individuals, LibraryThing offers a feebased service to libraries, where institutions can add LibraryThing tags, recommendations, and other features to their online catalog records. This poster will present data analyzing the quality and quantity of the metadata that a large academic library would expect to gain if utilizing such a service, focusing on the overlap between titles found in the library's catalog and in LibraryThing's database, and on a comparison between the controlled subject headings in the former and the user-generated tags in the latter. During February through April 2008, a random sample of 383 titles from the University of Minnesota Libraries catalog was searched in LibraryThing. Eighty works, or 21 percent of the sample, had corresponding records available in LibraryThing. Golder and Huberman (2006) outline the advantages and disadvantages of using controlled vocabulary for subject access to information resources versus the growing trend of tags supplied by users or by content creators. Using the 80 matched records from the sample, comparisons were made between the user-supplied tags in LibraryThing (social tags) and the subject headings in the library catalog records (controlled vocabulary system). In the library records, terms from all 6XX MARC fields were used. To make a more meaningful comparison, controlled subject terms were broken down into facets according to their headings and subheadings, and each unique facet counted separately. A total of 227 subject terms were applied to the 80 catalog records, an average of 2.84 per record. In LibraryThing, 698 tags were applied to the same 80 titles, an average of 8.73 per title. The poster will further explore the relationships between the terms applied in each source, and identify where overlaps and complementary levels of access occur.
- Source
- Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
-
Aliprand, J.M.: ¬The Unicode Standard : its scope, design prin. ciples, and prospects for international cataloging (2000)
0.03
0.033595107 = product of:
0.13438043 = sum of:
0.13438043 = sum of:
0.07195932 = weight(_text_:design in 4608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07195932 = score(doc=4608,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17322445 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7598698 = idf(docFreq=2798, maxDocs=44218)
0.046071928 = queryNorm
0.41541085 = fieldWeight in 4608, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7598698 = idf(docFreq=2798, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4608)
0.062421106 = weight(_text_:22 in 4608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.062421106 = score(doc=4608,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16133605 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046071928 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4608, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4608)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Clarke, R.I.: Cataloging research by design : a taxonomic approach to understanding research questions in cataloging (2018)
0.03
0.033499055 = product of:
0.13399622 = sum of:
0.13399622 = sum of:
0.09654356 = weight(_text_:design in 5188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09654356 = score(doc=5188,freq=10.0), product of:
0.17322445 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7598698 = idf(docFreq=2798, maxDocs=44218)
0.046071928 = queryNorm
0.55733216 = fieldWeight in 5188, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.7598698 = idf(docFreq=2798, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5188)
0.03745266 = weight(_text_:22 in 5188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03745266 = score(doc=5188,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16133605 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046071928 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5188, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5188)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- This article asserts that many research questions (RQs) in cataloging reflect design-based RQs, rather than traditional scientific ones. To support this idea, a review of existing discussions of RQs is presented to identify prominent types of RQs, including design-based RQs. RQ types are then classified into a taxonomic framework and compared with RQs from the Everyday Cataloger Concerns project, which aimed to identify important areas of research from the perspective of practicing catalogers. This comparative method demonstrates the ways in which the research areas identified by cataloging practitioners reflect design RQs-and therefore require design approaches and methods to answer them.
- Date
- 30. 5.2019 19:14:22
-
Budd, J.: Exploring categorization : undergraduate student searching and the evolution of catalogs (2007)
0.03
0.026876085 = product of:
0.10750434 = sum of:
0.10750434 = sum of:
0.05756745 = weight(_text_:design in 256) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05756745 = score(doc=256,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17322445 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7598698 = idf(docFreq=2798, maxDocs=44218)
0.046071928 = queryNorm
0.33232868 = fieldWeight in 256, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7598698 = idf(docFreq=2798, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=256)
0.049936883 = weight(_text_:22 in 256) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049936883 = score(doc=256,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16133605 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046071928 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 256, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=256)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Debate about the future of library catalogs and cataloging has been, and continues to be, featured in the literature of librarianship. Some research into the ways undergraduate students at one institution assign subjects to selected works provides insight into the cognitive elements of categorization. The design of catalogs can be informed by this research, as well as work currently being done on alternative means of organization, such as information systems ontologies.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Tarulli, L.; Spiteri, L.F.: Library catalogues of the future : a social space and collaborative tool? (2012)
0.02
0.024591058 = product of:
0.098364234 = sum of:
0.098364234 = weight(_text_:sites in 5565) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.098364234 = score(doc=5565,freq=4.0), product of:
0.2408473 = queryWeight, product of:
5.227637 = idf(docFreq=644, maxDocs=44218)
0.046071928 = queryNorm
0.40840912 = fieldWeight in 5565, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.227637 = idf(docFreq=644, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5565)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Next-generation catalogues are providing opportunities for library professionals and users to interact, collaborate, and enhance core library functions. Technology, innovation, and creativity are all components that are merging to create a localized, online social space that brings our physical library services and experiences into an online environment. While patrons are comfortable creating user-generated information on commercial Web sites and social media Web sites, library professionals should be exploring alternative methods of use for these tools within the library setting. Can the library catalogue promote remote readers' advisory services and act as a localized "Google"? Will patrons or library professionals be the driving force behind user-generated content within our catalogues? How can cataloguers be sure that the integrity of their bibliographic records is protected while inviting additional data sources to display in our catalogues? As library catalogues bring our physical library services into the online environment, catalogues also begin to encroach or "mash-up" with other areas of librarianship that have not been part of a cataloguer's expertise. Using library catalogues beyond their traditional role as tools for discovery and access raises issues surrounding the expertise of library professionals and the benefits of collaboration between frontline and backroom staff.
-
Barton, J.; Mak, L.: Old hopes, new possibilities : next-generation catalogues and the centralization of access (2012)
0.02
0.020866206 = product of:
0.08346482 = sum of:
0.08346482 = weight(_text_:sites in 5560) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08346482 = score(doc=5560,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2408473 = queryWeight, product of:
5.227637 = idf(docFreq=644, maxDocs=44218)
0.046071928 = queryNorm
0.34654665 = fieldWeight in 5560, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.227637 = idf(docFreq=644, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5560)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Next-generation catalogues can be viewed as the latest manifestation of a tendency in library catalogue history to strive for centralization of access to collections-a single portal for the discovery of library resources. Due to an increasing volume of published materials and the explosion of online information resources during the Internet age, the library does not currently provide centralized access to its various information silos, nor does it provide a user-friendly search and retrieval experience for users whose expectations are shaped by Google and other major commercial Web sites. Searching across library resources is a complicated task, bearing high-attention "transaction costs" for the user, which discourage the use of library resources. Libraries need access systems that minimize complexity, easing discovery and delivery of resources for user populations. Here, the authors review past efforts of centralization of access, consider the potential of next-generation catalogues in the context of this historical tendency toward centralization of access, and describe what goals underlie that centralization.
-
Majors, R.: Comparative user experiences of next-generation catalogue interfaces (2012)
0.02
0.017388504 = product of:
0.069554016 = sum of:
0.069554016 = weight(_text_:sites in 5571) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.069554016 = score(doc=5571,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2408473 = queryWeight, product of:
5.227637 = idf(docFreq=644, maxDocs=44218)
0.046071928 = queryNorm
0.28878886 = fieldWeight in 5571, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.227637 = idf(docFreq=644, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5571)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- One of the presumed advantages of next-generation library catalogue interfaces is that the user experience is improved-that it is both richer and more intuitive. Often the interfaces come with little or no user-facing documentation or imbedded "help" for patrons based on an assumption of ease of use and familiarity of the experience, having followed best practices in use on the Web. While there has been much gray literature (published on library Web sites, etc.) interrogating these implicit claims and contrasting the new interfaces to traditional Web-based catalogues, this article details a consistent and formal comparison of whether users can actually accomplish common library tasks, unassisted, using these interfaces. The author has undertaken a task-based usability test of vendor-provided next-generation catalogue interfaces and Web-scale discovery tools (Encore Synergy, Summon, WorldCat Local, Primo Central, EBSCO Discovery Service). Testing was done with undergraduates across all academic disciplines. The resulting qualitative data, noting any demonstrated trouble using the software as well as feedback or suggested improvements that the users may have about the software, will assist academic libraries in making or validating purchase and subscription decisions for these interfaces as well as help vendors make data-driven decisions about interface and experience enhancements.
-
Bolin, M.K.: Catalog design, catalog maintenance, catalog governance (2000)
0.01
0.012592879 = product of:
0.050371516 = sum of:
0.050371516 = product of:
0.10074303 = sum of:
0.10074303 = weight(_text_:design in 493) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10074303 = score(doc=493,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17322445 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7598698 = idf(docFreq=2798, maxDocs=44218)
0.046071928 = queryNorm
0.58157516 = fieldWeight in 493, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7598698 = idf(docFreq=2798, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=493)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
-
Hafter, R.: ¬The performance of card catalogs : a review of research (1979)
0.01
0.012484221 = product of:
0.049936883 = sum of:
0.049936883 = product of:
0.09987377 = sum of:
0.09987377 = weight(_text_:22 in 3069) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09987377 = score(doc=3069,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16133605 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046071928 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 3069, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3069)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 3.10.2000 20:48:22
-
Tennant, R.: ¬The print perplex : building the future catalog (1998)
0.01
0.012484221 = product of:
0.049936883 = sum of:
0.049936883 = product of:
0.09987377 = sum of:
0.09987377 = weight(_text_:22 in 6462) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09987377 = score(doc=6462,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16133605 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046071928 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6462, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6462)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Library journal. 123(1998) no.19, S.22-24
-
Treichler, W.: Katalogisierungsregeln, Kataloge und Benützer in schweizerischen Bibliotheken (1986)
0.01
0.009363165 = product of:
0.03745266 = sum of:
0.03745266 = product of:
0.07490532 = sum of:
0.07490532 = weight(_text_:22 in 5352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07490532 = score(doc=5352,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16133605 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046071928 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 5352, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5352)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 8.10.2000 14:22:27
-
Martin, S.K.: ¬The union catalogue : summary and future directions (1982)
0.01
0.009363165 = product of:
0.03745266 = sum of:
0.03745266 = product of:
0.07490532 = sum of:
0.07490532 = weight(_text_:22 in 290) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07490532 = score(doc=290,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16133605 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046071928 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 290, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=290)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 6. 1.2007 14:49:22
-
Lubetzky, S.: Writings on the classical art of cataloging (2001)
0.01
0.009363165 = product of:
0.03745266 = sum of:
0.03745266 = product of:
0.07490532 = sum of:
0.07490532 = weight(_text_:22 in 2622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07490532 = score(doc=2622,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16133605 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046071928 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2622, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2622)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Technicalities 22(2002) no.1, S.19-20 (S.S. Intner)
-
Albrechtsen, H.: ¬The order of catalogues : towards democratic classification and indexing in public libraries (1998)
0.01
0.008904511 = product of:
0.035618044 = sum of:
0.035618044 = product of:
0.07123609 = sum of:
0.07123609 = weight(_text_:design in 2099) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07123609 = score(doc=2099,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17322445 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7598698 = idf(docFreq=2798, maxDocs=44218)
0.046071928 = queryNorm
0.41123575 = fieldWeight in 2099, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.7598698 = idf(docFreq=2798, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2099)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Discusses how classification systems have developed to perform the work of articulation in electronic libraries as exemplified by projects involving cooperative design of classificatory structures and democratic classification and indexing. Delineates the stages in this evolution and focuses on the mutual design activity of libraries and users which took place in the development of an enriched multimedia catalogue on the WWW at Ballerup public library in Denmark and on research in england into the democratic indexing of images and fiction. Although recent projects are promising it is important to avoid a mechanistic concept of knowledge and maintain a social view
-
Kemp, R.: Catalog/cataloging changes and Web 2.0 functionality : new directions for serials (2008)
0.01
0.008904511 = product of:
0.035618044 = sum of:
0.035618044 = product of:
0.07123609 = sum of:
0.07123609 = weight(_text_:design in 2254) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07123609 = score(doc=2254,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17322445 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7598698 = idf(docFreq=2798, maxDocs=44218)
0.046071928 = queryNorm
0.41123575 = fieldWeight in 2254, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.7598698 = idf(docFreq=2798, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2254)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- This article presents an overview of some of the important recent developments in cataloging theory and practice and online catalog design. Changes in cataloging theory and practice include the incorporation of the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records principles into catalogs, the new Resource Description and Access cataloging manual, and the new CONSER Standard Record. Web 2.0 functionalities and advances in search technology and results displays are influencing online catalog design. The paper ends with hypothetical scenarios in which a catalog, enhanced by the developments described, fulfills the tasks of finding serials articles and titles.
-
Jochum, U.: ¬Eine Theorie der Verweisung (1998)
0.01
0.007802638 = product of:
0.031210553 = sum of:
0.031210553 = product of:
0.062421106 = sum of:
0.062421106 = weight(_text_:22 in 2268) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.062421106 = score(doc=2268,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16133605 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046071928 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2268, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2268)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Bibliothek: Forschung und Praxis. 22(1998) H.2, S.235-243
-
Gödert, W.: Inhaltliche Erschließung mehrbändiger Werke : oder eine Notiz zu der Frage, was wir als bibliographische Identität betrachten wollen? (1994)
0.01
0.007802638 = product of:
0.031210553 = sum of:
0.031210553 = product of:
0.062421106 = sum of:
0.062421106 = weight(_text_:22 in 2411) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.062421106 = score(doc=2411,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16133605 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046071928 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2411, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2411)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 20. 4.2020 20:22:29
