Search (144 results, page 1 of 8)

  • × theme_ss:"Information Gateway"
  1. Cervone, F.: Library portals and gateways (2009) 0.09
    0.08756393 = product of:
      0.14593989 = sum of:
        0.07017829 = weight(_text_:wide in 3839) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07017829 = score(doc=3839,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20479609 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046221454 = queryNorm
            0.342674 = fieldWeight in 3839, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3839)
        0.053843305 = weight(_text_:web in 3839) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053843305 = score(doc=3839,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1508442 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046221454 = queryNorm
            0.35694647 = fieldWeight in 3839, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3839)
        0.021918291 = product of:
          0.043836582 = sum of:
            0.043836582 = weight(_text_:22 in 3839) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043836582 = score(doc=3839,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16185966 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046221454 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3839, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3839)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Abstract
    Libraries have had web presences since the introduction of the World Wide Web. Providing access to information provided by the library has been attempted through various means throughout the years but no method has been as popular or pervasive as the uses of library gateways and portals. Development of gateways and portals in libraries has been affected by many factors many of which have been outside the direct control of libraries or librarians. Both the history of library practice in this area and these external factors have had a substantial impact on the state of library portal and gateway development today.
    Date
    27. 8.2011 14:22:27
  2. Kaizik, A.; Gödert, W.; Milanesi, C.: Erfahrungen und Ergebnisse aus der Evaluierung des EU-Projektes EULER im Rahmen des an der FH Köln angesiedelten Projektes EJECT (Evaluation von Subject Gateways des World Wide Web (2001) 0.09
    0.08543244 = product of:
      0.14238739 = sum of:
        0.05012735 = weight(_text_:wide in 5801) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05012735 = score(doc=5801,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20479609 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046221454 = queryNorm
            0.24476713 = fieldWeight in 5801, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5801)
        0.027194975 = weight(_text_:web in 5801) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027194975 = score(doc=5801,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1508442 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046221454 = queryNorm
            0.18028519 = fieldWeight in 5801, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5801)
        0.06506506 = sum of:
          0.020783428 = weight(_text_:research in 5801) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.020783428 = score(doc=5801,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13186905 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046221454 = queryNorm
              0.15760657 = fieldWeight in 5801, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5801)
          0.044281635 = weight(_text_:22 in 5801) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.044281635 = score(doc=5801,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.16185966 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046221454 = queryNorm
              0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 5801, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5801)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:42:22
    Source
    Information Research & Content Management: Orientierung, Ordnung und Organisation im Wissensmarkt; 23. DGI-Online-Tagung der DGI und 53. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Informationswissenschaft und Informationspraxis e.V. DGI, Frankfurt am Main, 8.-10.5.2001. Proceedings. Hrsg.: R. Schmidt
  3. Heery, R.: Information gateways : collaboration and content (2000) 0.08
    0.07810174 = product of:
      0.13016956 = sum of:
        0.07017829 = weight(_text_:wide in 4866) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07017829 = score(doc=4866,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20479609 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046221454 = queryNorm
            0.342674 = fieldWeight in 4866, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4866)
        0.038072966 = weight(_text_:web in 4866) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038072966 = score(doc=4866,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1508442 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046221454 = queryNorm
            0.25239927 = fieldWeight in 4866, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4866)
        0.021918291 = product of:
          0.043836582 = sum of:
            0.043836582 = weight(_text_:22 in 4866) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043836582 = score(doc=4866,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16185966 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046221454 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4866, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4866)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Abstract
    Information subject gateways provide targeted discovery services for their users, giving access to Web resources selected according to quality and subject coverage criteria. Information gateways recognise that they must collaborate on a wide range of issues relating to content to ensure continued success. This report is informed by discussion of content activities at the 1999 Imesh Workshop. The author considers the implications for subject based gateways of co-operation regarding coverage policy, creation of metadata, and provision of searching and browsing across services. Other possibilities for co-operation include working more closely with information providers, and diclosure of information in joint metadata registries
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:38:54
  4. Chung, W.; Chen, H.: Browsing the underdeveloped Web : an experiment on the Arabic Medical Web Directory (2009) 0.08
    0.076203324 = product of:
      0.1905083 = sum of:
        0.11766345 = weight(_text_:web in 2733) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11766345 = score(doc=2733,freq=26.0), product of:
            0.1508442 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046221454 = queryNorm
            0.780033 = fieldWeight in 2733, product of:
              5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
                26.0 = termFreq=26.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2733)
        0.07284486 = sum of:
          0.035270646 = weight(_text_:research in 2733) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.035270646 = score(doc=2733,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.13186905 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046221454 = queryNorm
              0.2674672 = fieldWeight in 2733, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2733)
          0.037574213 = weight(_text_:22 in 2733) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.037574213 = score(doc=2733,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16185966 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046221454 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2733, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2733)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    While the Web has grown significantly in recent years, some portions of the Web remain largely underdeveloped, as shown in a lack of high-quality content and functionality. An example is the Arabic Web, in which a lack of well-structured Web directories limits users' ability to browse for Arabic resources. In this research, we proposed an approach to building Web directories for the underdeveloped Web and developed a proof-of-concept prototype called the Arabic Medical Web Directory (AMedDir) that supports browsing of over 5,000 Arabic medical Web sites and pages organized in a hierarchical structure. We conducted an experiment involving Arab participants and found that the AMedDir significantly outperformed two benchmark Arabic Web directories in terms of browsing effectiveness, efficiency, information quality, and user satisfaction. Participants expressed strong preference for the AMedDir and provided many positive comments. This research thus contributes to developing a useful Web directory for organizing the information in the Arabic medical domain and to a better understanding of how to support browsing on the underdeveloped Web.
    Date
    22. 3.2009 17:57:50
  5. Zeitz, G.: Wissenschaftliche Informationen per Mausklick : Bibliotheken und Forschungsinstitute eröffnen fächerübergreifendes Internetportal - Hessische Einrichtungen sind beteiligt (2003) 0.05
    0.050036535 = product of:
      0.08339422 = sum of:
        0.040101882 = weight(_text_:wide in 1800) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040101882 = score(doc=1800,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20479609 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046221454 = queryNorm
            0.1958137 = fieldWeight in 1800, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1800)
        0.030767601 = weight(_text_:web in 1800) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030767601 = score(doc=1800,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1508442 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046221454 = queryNorm
            0.2039694 = fieldWeight in 1800, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1800)
        0.012524738 = product of:
          0.025049476 = sum of:
            0.025049476 = weight(_text_:22 in 1800) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025049476 = score(doc=1800,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16185966 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046221454 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1800, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1800)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Content
    "Wissenschaftler brauchen fundierte Informationen aus Quellen, auf die man sich verlassen kann. Die Suche nach solchen Quellen, wissenschaftlichen Aufsätzen, Dissertationen, Büchern, Datenbanken und Linklisten gestaltete sich bislang schwierig: Bibliotheken oder Verlage von Fachzeitschriften mussten einzeln angesteuert werden, einen zentralen, einheitlichen und einfachen Zugang gab es bislang, nicht. Das soll sich jetzt ändern: Das vom Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF) und von der Deutschen; Forschungsgemeinsehaft (DFG) geförderte Internetportal "vascoda", das nach dem Willen seiner Initiatoren auch Grundbaustein für die "Digitale Bibliothek Deutschland" sein soll, will Forschern Zugang zu wissenschaftlicher Information unterschiedlichster Fachrichtungen und unterschiedlichster Formate bieten. Das ist bundesweit in dieser Form ebenso einzigartig wie die Tatsache, dass die an vascoda angeschlossenen Datenbanken ausschließlich ;,geprüfte" Informationen liefern sollen: "Fachbibliothekare und Fachwissenschaftler der Anbieter, die sich unter dem vascoda-Dach zusammengeschlossen haben, prüfen, welche Texte vdrfügbar gemacht werden", sagt Christine Burblies von der vascoda-Geschäftsstelle in Hannover. "So können wir gewährleisten, dass die Informationen wissenschaftlichen Ansprüchen genügen." Das macht dann auch den wesentlichen Unterschied zu anderen Suchmaschinen aus: Die Suchmaske des Wissenschaftsportals ist zwar ähnlich einfach zu handhaben wie die Internet-Suchmaschine Google - vascoda verirrt sich aber nicht im World Wide Web. Und während andere Internet-Suchmaschinen nicht den Zugriff auf das so genannte "invisible web" bieten, also beispielsweise auf Bibliothekskataloge, ermöglicht vascoda auch den Zugriff auf dieses unsichtbare Netz. Das Wissenschaftsportal ist unentgeltlich nutzbar, und auch ein Großteil der Informationen ist kostenlos zu beziehen. Es sind aber auch kostenpflichtige Informationen verfügbar - zum Beispiel aus Verlagsangeboten und kommerziellen Datenbanken. Wer Informationen etwa zu soziologischen Fragen sucht, landet sicher auch auf den Internetseiten des Instituts für Soziologie in Darmstadt (www.ifs.tu-darmstadt.de/forsch.htm), das ebenso zu den vascoda-Anbietern gehört wie das Deutsche Institut für Internationale Pädagogik (DIPF) in Frankfurt (www.dipfde/index_1024.htm). In vascoda eingebunden sind zur Zeit 23 virtuelle Fachbibliotheken (ViFas), die vier großen Informationsverbünde EconDoc (Wirtschaft), GetInfo (Naturwissenschaften und Technik), infoconnex (Pädagogik, Sozialwissenschaften, Psychologie) und Medizin sowie die Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek (EZB), ein kooperativer Service von 209 Bibliotheken zur Bereitstellung von elektronischen Zeitschriften, -die im Internet publiziert werden. "Wir planen überdies die Erweiterung um das Fach Germanistik, und wenn es soweit ist, wird die Stadt- und Universitätsbibliothek Frankfurt diesen Service bereitstellen", sagt Burblies."
    Date
    17. 7.1996 9:33:22
  6. Lossau, N.: Search engine technology and digital libraries : libraries need to discover the academic internet (2004) 0.04
    0.043300506 = product of:
      0.10825126 = sum of:
        0.07017829 = weight(_text_:wide in 1161) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07017829 = score(doc=1161,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20479609 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046221454 = queryNorm
            0.342674 = fieldWeight in 1161, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1161)
        0.038072966 = weight(_text_:web in 1161) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038072966 = score(doc=1161,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1508442 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046221454 = queryNorm
            0.25239927 = fieldWeight in 1161, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1161)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    With the development of the World Wide Web, the "information search" has grown to be a significant business sector of a global, competitive and commercial market. Powerful players have entered this market, such as commercial internet search engines, information portals, multinational publishers and online content integrators. Will Google, Yahoo or Microsoft be the only portals to global knowledge in 2010? If libraries do not want to become marginalized in a key area of their traditional services, they need to acknowledge the challenges that come with the globalisation of scholarly information, the existence and further growth of the academic internet
  7. Woldering, B.: 2nd European Library Seminar / 3rd Gabriel Workshop (2003) 0.04
    0.037114717 = product of:
      0.09278679 = sum of:
        0.060152818 = weight(_text_:wide in 2132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.060152818 = score(doc=2132,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20479609 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046221454 = queryNorm
            0.29372054 = fieldWeight in 2132, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2132)
        0.032633968 = weight(_text_:web in 2132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032633968 = score(doc=2132,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1508442 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046221454 = queryNorm
            0.21634221 = fieldWeight in 2132, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2132)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    From 4 to 6 June 2003 the 2nd European Library Seminar / 3rd Gabriel Workshop was held at the Biblioteca Nacional in Lisbon, Portugal. 62 librarians and webmasters from 20 countries participated in the workshop, mainly Gabriel contacts but also quite a number of librarians from Portugal. Since its foundation in 1995 Gabriel, the world wide web service of the European national libraries, has established itself as the official network service of the Conference of European National Librarians (CENL) and has undergone a continuous development. The Gabriel website has been redesigned and restructured, and it was relaunched in summer 2002. At present, 41 libraries from 39 European countries are represented in Gabriel. Gabriel offers access to varied information sources and numerous online-catalogues and Services of the European national libraries. Gabriel is the only trans-European library service.
  8. Price, A.: NOVAGate : a Nordic gateway to electronic resources in the forestry, veterinary and agricultural sciences (2000) 0.04
    0.036838632 = product of:
      0.09209658 = sum of:
        0.07017829 = weight(_text_:wide in 4874) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07017829 = score(doc=4874,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20479609 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046221454 = queryNorm
            0.342674 = fieldWeight in 4874, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4874)
        0.021918291 = product of:
          0.043836582 = sum of:
            0.043836582 = weight(_text_:22 in 4874) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043836582 = score(doc=4874,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16185966 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046221454 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4874, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4874)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    NOVAGate is a subject-based information gateway covering electronic resources in the agricultural, veterinary and related fields. The service, which opened in July 1998, is produced by the veterinary and agricultural libraries of the 5 Nordic countries - Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway and Sweden - which serve the NOVA University. The gateway covers Nordic and European resources as well as the resources of international organizations, but being planned is a network of subject gateways which will give access to a wide range of international quality resources within the agricultural, veterinary and related fields. The service uses the ROADS software
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:41:00
  9. Meißner, B.: ViFaArt: eine virtuelle Fachbibliothek zur Gegenwartskunst (2004) 0.04
    0.03543474 = product of:
      0.08858685 = sum of:
        0.05012735 = weight(_text_:wide in 2409) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05012735 = score(doc=2409,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20479609 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046221454 = queryNorm
            0.24476713 = fieldWeight in 2409, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2409)
        0.038459502 = weight(_text_:web in 2409) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038459502 = score(doc=2409,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1508442 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046221454 = queryNorm
            0.25496176 = fieldWeight in 2409, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2409)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Virtuelle Quellen zur Kunst-Erschließung und Recherchewar das Thema eines Workshops, der am 16. Oktober 2003 in der Sächsischen Landesbibliothek - Staats- und Universitätsbibliothek Dresden (SLUB) veranstaltet wurde. Anliegen war die Präsentation des DFG-geförderten Projektes ViFaArtVirtuelle Fachbibliothek Gegenwartskunst. Im Folgenden wird dieses Projekt näher vorgestellt. Schwerpunkt der Darstellung wird der hierbei entwickelte Katalog von Webseiten bzw. Internetquellen sein (Art-Guide). Die Auseinandersetzung mit Internetquellen und ihre Nutzung für die Informationsgewinnung ist auch für die Kunstwissenschaft zum aktuellen Thema geworden. Eine Hauptaufgabe des World Wide Web liegt neben dem schnellen und direkten Informationsaustausch in der Vermittlung von Information - einem Hauptanliegen wissenschaftlicher Bibliotheken überhaupt. Somit rückt die Problematik auch immer näher an den Aufgabenkreis von Bibliotheken heran. Es stellen sich Fragen wie: Welche Art von Informationen liegen im Web bereit, sind sie vertrauenswürdig, wie kann man sie nutzen und vor allem: wie sind sie zu finden? Seit 2000 wird an der SLUB eine Virtuelle Fachbibliothek zur Gegenwartskunst projektiert: ViFaArt. Das Projekt ist Partner von Vascoda, dem interdisziplinären Internetportal für wissenschaftliche Information in Deutschland. Unter http:// www.vascoda.de/sind Online- und Print-Informationen von derzeit über 20 Virtuellen Fachbibliotheken, 4 Informationsverbünden und der Elektronischen Zeitschriftenbibliothek (EZB) abrufbar. Anfang des nächsten Jahres wird auch ViFaArt den Katalog der Internetquellen (Art-Guide, vgl. unten) als Datenbank dort einbringen. Eine Metasuche über Vascoda wird dann also immer auch alle ArtGuide-Katalogisate berücksichtigen.
  10. Stempfhuber, M.; Zapilko, B.: Modelling text-fact-integration in digital libraries (2009) 0.03
    0.03270064 = product of:
      0.08175159 = sum of:
        0.060152818 = weight(_text_:wide in 3393) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.060152818 = score(doc=3393,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20479609 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046221454 = queryNorm
            0.29372054 = fieldWeight in 3393, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3393)
        0.021598773 = product of:
          0.043197546 = sum of:
            0.043197546 = weight(_text_:research in 3393) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043197546 = score(doc=3393,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.13186905 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046221454 = queryNorm
                0.3275791 = fieldWeight in 3393, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3393)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Digital Libraries currently face the challenge of integrating many different types of research information (e.g. publications, primary data, expert's profiles, institutional profiles, project information etc.) according to their scientific users' needs. To date no general, integrated model for knowledge organization and retrieval in Digital Libraries exists. This causes the problem of structural and semantic heterogeneity due to the wide range of metadata standards, indexing vocabularies and indexing approaches used for different types of information. The research presented in this paper focuses on areas in which activities are being undertaken in the field of Digital Libraries in order to treat semantic interoperability problems. We present a model for the integrated retrieval of factual and textual data which combines multiple approaches to semantic interoperability und sets them into context. Embedded in the research cycle, traditional content indexing methods for publications meet the newer, but rarely used ontology-based approaches which seem to be better suited for representing complex information like the one contained in survey data. The benefits of our model are (1) easy re-use of available knowledge organisation systems and (2) reduced efforts for domain modelling with ontologies.
  11. Prasad, A.R.D.; Madalli, D.P.: Faceted infrastructure for semantic digital libraries (2008) 0.03
    0.030202365 = product of:
      0.07550591 = sum of:
        0.060809813 = weight(_text_:web in 1905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.060809813 = score(doc=1905,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.1508442 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046221454 = queryNorm
            0.40312994 = fieldWeight in 1905, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1905)
        0.014696103 = product of:
          0.029392205 = sum of:
            0.029392205 = weight(_text_:research in 1905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029392205 = score(doc=1905,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.13186905 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046221454 = queryNorm
                0.22288933 = fieldWeight in 1905, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1905)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - The paper aims to argue that digital library retrieval should be based on semantic representations and propose a semantic infrastructure for digital libraries. Design/methodology/approach - The approach taken is formal model based on subject representation for digital libraries. Findings - Search engines and search techniques have fallen short of user expectations as they do not give context based retrieval. Deploying semantic web technologies would lead to efficient and more precise representation of digital library content and hence better retrieval. Though digital libraries often have metadata of information resources which can be accessed through OAI-PMH, much remains to be accomplished in making digital libraries semantic web compliant. This paper presents a semantic infrastructure for digital libraries, that will go a long way in providing them and web based information services with products highly customised to users needs. Research limitations/implications - Here only a model for semantic infrastructure is proposed. This model is proposed after studying current user-centric, top-down models adopted in digital library service architectures. Originality/value - This paper gives a generic model for building semantic infrastructure for digital libraries. Faceted ontologies for digital libraries is just one approach. But the same may be adopted by groups working with different approaches in building ontologies to realise efficient retrieval in digital libraries.
    Footnote
    Beitrag eines Themenheftes "Digital libraries and the semantic web: context, applications and research".
    Theme
    Semantic Web
  12. Bayer, M.: Wikipedia - kein Einzelfall (2005) 0.03
    0.028347794 = product of:
      0.07086948 = sum of:
        0.040101882 = weight(_text_:wide in 3721) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040101882 = score(doc=3721,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20479609 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046221454 = queryNorm
            0.1958137 = fieldWeight in 3721, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3721)
        0.030767601 = weight(_text_:web in 3721) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030767601 = score(doc=3721,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1508442 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046221454 = queryNorm
            0.2039694 = fieldWeight in 3721, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3721)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Content
    ""Das Ehrenamt", schreibt Wikipedia, "bezeichnet ein öffentliches unbezahltes Amt, das durch soziale Anerkennung vergolten wird." Später heißt es weiter in eigener Sache: "Wikipedia wird zum größten Teil ehrenamtlich geleistet und stellt so eine neue Form von bürgerschaftlichem Engagement dar." Neu und unerwartet klingt das zunächst in der Tat: Das erfolgreichste Onlineprojekt seiner Art lebt nicht von den Millionen eines internationalen Konzerns, sondern dank der unentgeltlichen Arbeit seiner Nutzer. Steht das Internet doch in den Augen vieler vor allem für Kommerz und windige Geschäfte. Doch Wikipedia ist kein Einzelfall. Es gibt weitere Projekte im Internet, die in ihrer Qualität rein kommerziell kaum realisierbar sein dürften. Da ist etwa das "Open Directory" - nicht weniger als der Versuch, dem Internet ein Inhaltsverzeichnis zu geben. Ähnliche Kataloge professioneller Anbieter sind oft veraltet; zunehmend nehmen sie Adressen gegen Bezahlung vorrangig auf - was die Listen-Unabhängigkeit in Frage stellt. Beim "Open Directory" fließt kein Geld. Um die Einträge kümmern sich etwa 68.000 ehrenamtliche Editoren - eine Redaktionsstärke, die sich selbst finanzstarke Unternehmen kaum werden leisten wollen. Mehr als 400 Webseiten übernehmen den Katalog - unter anderem die bekannteste aller Web-Suchmaschinen in der Rubrik "Google Verzeichnis". Gegenseitiger Austausch und Hilfe - das macht entgegen mancher Wahrnehmung schon immer den Reiz des internets aus. Denn das Medium bringt Interessierte selbst für ungewöhnliche Vorlieben zusammen. Das geschieht oft abseits des bunten World Wide Web, etwa in Mail-Verteilerlisten oder den kaum bekannten Foren des Usenet. Sie leben von Debatten, Fragen und Antworten. Und sammeln erstaunliches Fachwissen - mal auf nationaler, mal auf internationaler Ebene. Google bietet einen Einblick in diese Welt unter groups.google.de. Freiwillig zusammen an einer gemeinsamen Sache arbeiten - das ist auch das Prinzip von Open-Source-Software, als deren prominenteste Vertreterin das Betriebssystem Linux gilt. Derartige Programme stehen unter bestimmten Bedingungen frei zur Verfügung. Den Aktiven ist die soziale Anerkennung sicher, von der Wikipedia spricht. Und manchmal nicht nur die. Hier und da wird aus dem Ehrenamt ein bezahlter Job - beispielsweise wenn es darum geht, Computersysteme zu betreuen, die mit der freien Software laufen."
  13. Blosser, J.; Michaelson, R.; Routh. R.; Xia, P.: Defining the landscape of Web resources : Concluding Report of the BAER Web Resources Sub-Group (2000) 0.03
    0.02803426 = product of:
      0.07008565 = sum of:
        0.057560913 = weight(_text_:web in 1447) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.057560913 = score(doc=1447,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.1508442 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046221454 = queryNorm
            0.38159183 = fieldWeight in 1447, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1447)
        0.012524738 = product of:
          0.025049476 = sum of:
            0.025049476 = weight(_text_:22 in 1447) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025049476 = score(doc=1447,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16185966 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046221454 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1447, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1447)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    The BAER Web Resources Group was charged in October 1999 with defining and describing the parameters of electronic resources that do not clearly belong to the categories being defined by the BAER Digital Group or the BAER Electronic Journals Group. After some difficulty identifying precisely which resources fell under the Group's charge, we finally named the following types of resources for our consideration: web sites, electronic texts, indexes, databases and abstracts, online reference resources, and networked and non-networked CD-ROMs. Electronic resources are a vast and growing collection that touch nearly every department within the Library. It is unrealistic to think one department can effectively administer all aspects of the collection. The Group then began to focus on the concern of bibliographic access to these varied resources, and to define parameters for handling or processing them within the Library. Some key elements became evident as the work progressed. * Selection process of resources to be acquired for the collection * Duplication of effort * Use of CORC * Resource Finder design * Maintenance of Resource Finder * CD-ROMs not networked * Communications * Voyager search limitations. An unexpected collaboration with the Web Development Committee on the Resource Finder helped to steer the Group to more detailed descriptions of bibliographic access. This collaboration included development of data elements for the Resource Finder database, and some discussions on Library staff processing of the resources. The Web Resources Group invited expert testimony to help the Group broaden its view to envision public use of the resources and discuss concerns related to technical services processing. The first testimony came from members of the Resource Finder Committee. Some background information on the Web Development Resource Finder Committee was shared. The second testimony was from librarians who select electronic texts. Three main themes were addressed: accessing CD-ROMs; the issue of including non-networked CD-ROMs in the Resource Finder; and, some special concerns about electronic texts. The third testimony came from librarians who select indexes and abstracts and also provide Reference services. Appendices to this report include minutes of the meetings with the experts (Appendix A), a list of proposed data elements to be used in the Resource Finder (Appendix B), and recommendations made to the Resource Finder Committee (Appendix C). Below are summaries of the key elements.
    Date
    21. 4.2002 10:22:31
  14. Buckland, M.; Lancaster, L.: Combining place, time, and topic : the Electronic Cultural Atlas Initiative (2004) 0.03
    0.0260104 = product of:
      0.065026 = sum of:
        0.056712627 = weight(_text_:wide in 1194) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.056712627 = score(doc=1194,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.20479609 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046221454 = queryNorm
            0.2769224 = fieldWeight in 1194, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1194)
        0.008313371 = product of:
          0.016626742 = sum of:
            0.016626742 = weight(_text_:research in 1194) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.016626742 = score(doc=1194,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13186905 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046221454 = queryNorm
                0.12608525 = fieldWeight in 1194, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1194)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    The Electronic Cultural Atlas Initiative was formed to encourage scholarly communication and the sharing of data among researchers who emphasize the relationships between place, time, and topic in the study of culture and history. In an effort to develop better tools and practices, The Electronic Cultural Atlas Initiative has sponsored the collaborative development of software for downloading and editing geo-temporal data to create dynamic maps, a clearinghouse of shared datasets accessible through a map-based interface, projects on format and content standards for gazetteers and time period directories, studies to improve geo-temporal aspects in online catalogs, good practice guidelines for preparing e-publications with dynamic geo-temporal displays, and numerous international conferences. The Electronic Cultural Atlas Initiative (ECAI) grew out of discussions among an international group of scholars interested in religious history and area studies. It was established as a unit under the Dean of International and Area Studies at the University of California, Berkeley in 1997. ECAI's mission is to promote an international collaborative effort to transform humanities scholarship through use of the digital environment to share data and by placing greater emphasis on the notions of place and time. Professor Lewis Lancaster is the Director. Professor Michael Buckland, with a library and information studies background, joined the effort as Co-Director in 2000. Assistance from the Lilly Foundation, the California Digital Library (University of California), and other sources has enabled ECAI to nurture a community; to develop a catalog ("clearinghouse") of Internet-accessible georeferenced resources; to support the development of software for obtaining, editing, manipulating, and dynamically visualizing geo-temporally encoded data; and to undertake research and development projects as needs and resources determine. Several hundred scholars worldwide, from a wide range of disciplines, are informally affiliated with ECAI, all interested in shared use of historical and cultural data. The Academia Sinica (Taiwan), The British Library, and the Arts and Humanities Data Service (UK) are among the well-known affiliates. However, ECAI mainly comprises individual scholars and small teams working on their own small projects on a very wide range of cultural, social, and historical topics. Numerous specialist committees have been fostering standardization and collaboration by area and by themes such as trade-routes, cities, religion, and sacred sites.
  15. Hellweg, H.; Hermes, B.; Stempfhuber, M.; Enderle, W.; Fischer, T.: DBClear : a generic system for clearinghouses (2002) 0.03
    0.025514692 = product of:
      0.06378673 = sum of:
        0.046151403 = weight(_text_:web in 3605) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.046151403 = score(doc=3605,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1508442 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046221454 = queryNorm
            0.3059541 = fieldWeight in 3605, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3605)
        0.017635323 = product of:
          0.035270646 = sum of:
            0.035270646 = weight(_text_:research in 3605) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035270646 = score(doc=3605,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.13186905 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046221454 = queryNorm
                0.2674672 = fieldWeight in 3605, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3605)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Clearinghouses - or subject gateways - are domain-specific collections of links to resources an the Internet. The links are described with metadata and structured according to a domain-specific subject hierarchy. Users access the information by searching in the metadata or by browsing the subject hierarchy. The standards for metadata vary across existing Clearinghouses and different technologies for storing and accessing the metadata are used. This makes it difficult to distribute the editorial or administrative work involved in maintaining a clearinghouse, or to exchange information with other systems. DBClear is a generic, platform-independent clearinghouse system, whose metadata schema can be adapted to different standards. The data is stored in a relational database. It includes a workflow component to Support distributed maintenance and automation modules for link checking and metadata extraction. The presentation of the clearinghouse an the Web can be modified to allow seamless integration into existing web sites.
    Source
    Gaining insight from research information (CRIS2002): Proceedings of the 6th International Conference an Current Research Information Systems, University of Kassel, August 29 - 31, 2002. Eds: W. Adamczak u. A. Nase
  16. Neubauer, W.: ¬The Knowledge portal or the vision of easy access to information (2009) 0.02
    0.024743145 = product of:
      0.061857864 = sum of:
        0.040101882 = weight(_text_:wide in 2812) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040101882 = score(doc=2812,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20479609 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046221454 = queryNorm
            0.1958137 = fieldWeight in 2812, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2812)
        0.02175598 = weight(_text_:web in 2812) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02175598 = score(doc=2812,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1508442 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046221454 = queryNorm
            0.14422815 = fieldWeight in 2812, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2812)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    From a quantitative and qualitative point of view the ETH Library is offering its users an extensive choice of information services. In this respect all researchers, all scientists and also all students have access to nearly all relevant information. This is one side of the coin. On the other hand, this broad, but also heterogeneous bundle of information sources has disadvantages, which should not be underestimated: The more information services and information channels you have, the more complex is it to find what you want to get for your scientific work. A portal-like integration of all the different information resources is still missing. The vision, the main goal of the project "Knowledge Portal" is, to develop a central access system in terms of a "single-point-of-access" for all electronic information services. This means, that all these sources - from the library's catalogue and the fulltext inhouse applications to external, licensed sources - should be accessible via one central Web service. Although the primary target group for this vision is the science community of the ETH Zurich, the interested public should also be taken into account, for the library has also a nation-wide responsibility.The general idea to launch a complex project like that comes from a survey the library did one and a half years ago. We asked a defined sample of scientists what they expected to get from their library and one constant answer was, that they wanted to have one point of access to all the electronic library services and besides this, the search processes should be as simple as possible. We accepted this demand as an order to develop a "single-point-of-access" to all electronic services the library provides. The presentation gives an overview about the general idea of the project and describes the current status.
  17. Rusch-Feja, D.; Becker, H.J.: Global Info : the German digital libraries project (1999) 0.02
    0.023476457 = product of:
      0.058691144 = sum of:
        0.040101882 = weight(_text_:wide in 1242) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040101882 = score(doc=1242,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20479609 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046221454 = queryNorm
            0.1958137 = fieldWeight in 1242, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1242)
        0.018589262 = product of:
          0.037178524 = sum of:
            0.037178524 = weight(_text_:research in 1242) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037178524 = score(doc=1242,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.13186905 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046221454 = queryNorm
                0.2819352 = fieldWeight in 1242, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1242)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    The concept for the German Digital Libraries Program is imbedded in the Information Infrastructure Program of the German Federal Government for the years 1996-2000 which has been explicated in the Program Paper entitled "Information as Raw Material for Innovation".3 The Program Paper was published 1996 by the Federal Ministry for Education, Research, and Technology. The actual grants program "Global Info" was initiated by the Information and Communication Commission of the Joint Learned Societies to further technological advancement in enabling all researchers in Germany direct access to literature, research results, and other relevant information. This Commission was founded by four of the learned societies in 1995, and it has sponsored a series of workshops to increase awareness of leading edge technology and innovations in accessing electronic information sources. Now, nine of the leading research-level learned societies -- often those with umbrella responsibilities for other learned societies in their field -- are members of the Information and Communication Commission and represent the mathematicians, physicists, computer scientists, chemists, educational researchers, sociologists, psychologists, biologists and information technologists in the German Association of Engineers. (The German professional librarian societies are not members, as such, of this Commission, but are represented through delegates from libraries in the learned societies and in the future, hopefully, also by the German Association of Documentalists or through the cooperation between the documentalist and librarian professional societies.) The Federal Ministry earmarked 60 Million German Marks for projects within the framework of the German Digital Libraries Program in two phases over the next six years. The scope for the German Digital Libraries Program was announced in a press release in April 1997,4 and the first call for preliminary projects and expressions of interest in participation ended in July 1997. The Consortium members were suggested by the Information and Communication Commission of the Learned Societies (IuK Kommission), by key scientific research funding agencies in the German government, and by the publishers themselves. The first official meeting of the participants took place on December 1, 1997, at the Deutsche Bibliothek, located in the renowned center of German book trade, Frankfurt, thus documenting the active role and participation of libraries and publishers. In contrast to the Digital Libraries Project of the National Science Foundation in the United States, the German Digital Libraries project is based on furthering cooperation with universities, scientific publishing houses (including various international publishers), book dealers, and special subject information centers, as well as academic and research libraries. The goals of the German Digital Libraries Project are to achieve: 1) efficient access to world wide information; 2) directly from the scientist's desktop; 3) while providing the organization for and stimulating fundamental structural changes in the information and communication process of the scientific community.
  18. Chowdhury, G.G.: Digital libraries and reference services : present and future (2002) 0.02
    0.022583393 = product of:
      0.05645848 = sum of:
        0.038459502 = weight(_text_:web in 4466) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038459502 = score(doc=4466,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1508442 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046221454 = queryNorm
            0.25496176 = fieldWeight in 4466, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4466)
        0.017998978 = product of:
          0.035997957 = sum of:
            0.035997957 = weight(_text_:research in 4466) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035997957 = score(doc=4466,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.13186905 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046221454 = queryNorm
                0.2729826 = fieldWeight in 4466, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4466)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Reference services have taken a central place in library and information services. They are also regarded as personalised services since in most cases a personal discussion takes place between a user and a reference librarian. Based on this, the librarian points to the sources that are considered to be most appropriate to meet the specific information need(s) of the user. Since the Web and digital libraries are meant for providing direct access to information sources and services without the intervention of human intermediaries, the pertinent question that appears is whether we need reference services in digital libraries, and, if so, how best to offer such services. Current digital libraries focus more on access to, and retrieval of, digital information, and hardly lay emphasis on the service aspects. This may have been caused by the narrower definitions of digital libraries formulated by digital library researchers. This paper looks at the current state of research in personalised information services in digital libraries. It first analyses some representative definitions of digital libraries in order to establish the need for personalised services. It then provides a brief overview of the various online reference and information services currently available on the Web. The paper also briefly reviews digital library research that specifically focuses on the personalisation of digital libraries and the provision of digital reference and information services. Finally, the paper proposes some new areas of research that may be undertaken to improve the provision of personalised information services in digital libraries.
  19. Shiri, A.; Molberg, K.: Interfaces to knowledge organization systems in Canadian digital library collections (2005) 0.02
    0.022583393 = product of:
      0.05645848 = sum of:
        0.038459502 = weight(_text_:web in 2559) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038459502 = score(doc=2559,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1508442 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046221454 = queryNorm
            0.25496176 = fieldWeight in 2559, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2559)
        0.017998978 = product of:
          0.035997957 = sum of:
            0.035997957 = weight(_text_:research in 2559) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035997957 = score(doc=2559,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.13186905 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046221454 = queryNorm
                0.2729826 = fieldWeight in 2559, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2559)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to report an investigation into the ways in which Canadian digital library collections have incorporated knowledge organization systems into their search interfaces. Design/methodology/approach - A combination of data-gathering techniques was used. These were as follows: a review of the literature related to the application of knowledge organization systems, deep scanning of Canadian governmental and academic institutions web sites on the web, identify and contact researchers in the area of knowledge organization, and identify and contact people in the governmental organizations who are involved in knowledge organization and information management. Findings - A total of 33 digital collections were identified that have made use of some type of knowledge organization system. Thesauri, subject heading lists and classification schemes were the widely used knowledge organization systems in the surveyed Canadian digital library collections. Research limitations/implications - The target population for this research was limited to governmental and academic digital library collections. Practical implications - An evaluation of the knowledge organization systems interfaces showed that searching, browsing and navigation facilities as well as bilingual features call for improvements. Originality/value - This research contributes to the following areas: digital libraries, knowledge organization systems and services and search interface design.
  20. Srinivasan, R.; Boast, R.; Becvar, K.M.; Furner, J.: Blobgects : digital museum catalogs and diverse user communities (2009) 0.02
    0.02164617 = product of:
      0.054115426 = sum of:
        0.038459502 = weight(_text_:web in 2754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038459502 = score(doc=2754,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1508442 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046221454 = queryNorm
            0.25496176 = fieldWeight in 2754, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2754)
        0.015655924 = product of:
          0.031311847 = sum of:
            0.031311847 = weight(_text_:22 in 2754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031311847 = score(doc=2754,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16185966 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046221454 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2754, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2754)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    This article presents an exploratory study of Blobgects, an experimental interface for an online museum catalog that enables social tagging and blogging activity around a set of cultural heritage objects held by a preeminent museum of anthropology and archaeology. This study attempts to understand not just whether social tagging and commenting about these objects is useful but rather whose tags and voices matter in presenting different expert perspectives around digital museum objects. Based on an empirical comparison between two different user groups (Canadian Inuit high-school students and museum studies students in the United States), we found that merely adding the ability to tag and comment to the museum's catalog does not sufficiently allow users to learn about or engage with the objects represented by catalog entries. Rather, the specialist language of the catalog provides too little contextualization for users to enter into the sort of dialog that proponents of Web 2.0 technologies promise. Overall, we propose a more nuanced application of Web 2.0 technologies within museums - one which provides a contextual basis that gives users a starting point for engagement and permits users to make sense of objects in relation to their own needs, uses, and understandings.
    Date
    22. 3.2009 18:52:32

Languages

  • e 108
  • d 36

Types

  • a 129
  • el 29
  • s 6
  • m 5
  • x 2
  • More… Less…