Search (178 results, page 1 of 9)

  • × theme_ss:"Multilinguale Probleme"
  1. Powell, J.; Fox, E.A.: Multilingual federated searching across heterogeneous collections (1998) 0.09 
    0.08982116 = product of:
  0.17964232 = sum of:
    0.16057299 = weight(_text_:markup in 1250) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.16057299 = score(doc=1250,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.27638784 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.572923 = idf(docFreq=167, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042049456 = queryNorm
        0.5809698 = fieldWeight in 1250, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.572923 = idf(docFreq=167, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1250)
    0.019069336 = product of:
      0.05720801 = sum of:
        0.05720801 = weight(_text_:language in 1250) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05720801 = score(doc=1250,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16497234 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042049456 = queryNorm
            0.34677336 = fieldWeight in 1250, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1250)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    This article describes a scalable system for searching heterogeneous multilingual collections on the World Wide Web. It details a markup language for describing the characteristics of a search engine and its interface, and a protocol for requesting word translations between languages.
  2. Hull, D.: ¬A weighted Boolean model for cross-language text retrieval (1998) 0.03 
    0.03172376 = product of:
  0.12689504 = sum of:
    0.12689504 = product of:
      0.19034255 = sum of:
        0.12135652 = weight(_text_:language in 6307) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12135652 = score(doc=6307,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16497234 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042049456 = queryNorm
            0.7356174 = fieldWeight in 6307, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6307)
        0.06898602 = weight(_text_:29 in 6307) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06898602 = score(doc=6307,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14791684 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042049456 = queryNorm
            0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 6307, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6307)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    5. 8.2001 14:04:29
    Source
    Cross-language information retrieval. Ed.: G. Grefenstette
  3. MacEwan, A.: Crossing language barriers in Europe : Linking LCSH to other subject heading languages (2000) 0.03 
    0.027895436 = product of:
  0.11158174 = sum of:
    0.11158174 = sum of:
      0.042906005 = weight(_text_:language in 5618) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.042906005 = score(doc=5618,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16497234 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
            0.042049456 = queryNorm
          0.26008 = fieldWeight in 5618, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5618)
      0.03449301 = weight(_text_:29 in 5618) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03449301 = score(doc=5618,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.14791684 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
            0.042049456 = queryNorm
          0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 5618, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5618)
      0.034182724 = weight(_text_:22 in 5618) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.034182724 = score(doc=5618,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.14725003 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.042049456 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5618, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5618)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    27. 5.2001 16:22:10
    Series
    Cataloging and classification quarterly; vol.29, nos.1/2
  4. Schubert, K.: Parameters for the design of an intermediate language for multilingual thesauri (1995) 0.03 
    0.02530179 = product of:
  0.10120716 = sum of:
    0.10120716 = product of:
      0.15181074 = sum of:
        0.111930884 = weight(_text_:language in 2092) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.111930884 = score(doc=2092,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.16497234 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042049456 = queryNorm
            0.6784828 = fieldWeight in 2092, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2092)
        0.039879844 = weight(_text_:22 in 2092) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.039879844 = score(doc=2092,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14725003 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042049456 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2092, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2092)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    The architecture of multilingual software systems is sometimes centred around an intermediate language. The question is analyzed to what extent this approach can be useful for multilingual thesauri, in particular regarding the functionality the thesaurus is designed to fulfil. Both the runtime use, and the construction and maintenance of the system is taken into consideration. Using the perspective of general language technology enables to draw on experience from a broader range of fields beyond thesaurus design itself as well as to consider the possibility of using a thesaurus as a knowledge module in various systems which process natural language. Therefore the features which thesauri and other natural-language processing systems have in common are emphasized, especially at the level of systems design and their core functionality
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 22(1995) nos.3/4, S.136-140
  5. Levergood, B.; Farrenkopf, S.; Frasnelli, E.: ¬The specification of the language of the field and interoperability : cross-language access to catalogues and online libraries (CACAO) (2008) 0.02 
    0.024616893 = product of:
  0.09846757 = sum of:
    0.09846757 = product of:
      0.14770135 = sum of:
        0.11351863 = weight(_text_:language in 2646) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11351863 = score(doc=2646,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.16497234 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042049456 = queryNorm
            0.6881071 = fieldWeight in 2646, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2646)
        0.034182724 = weight(_text_:22 in 2646) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034182724 = score(doc=2646,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14725003 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042049456 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2646, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2646)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    The CACAO Project (Cross-language Access to Catalogues and Online Libraries) has been designed to implement natural language processing and cross-language information retrieval techniques to provide cross-language access to information in libraries, a critical issue in the linguistically diverse European Union. This project report addresses two metadata-related challenges for the library community in this context: "false friends" (identical words having different meanings in different languages) and term ambiguity. The possible solutions involve enriching the metadata with attributes specifying language or the source authority file, or associating potential search terms to classes in a classification system. The European Library will evaluate an early implementation of this work in late 2008.
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
  6. Larkey, L.S.; Connell, M.E.: Structured queries, language modelling, and relevance modelling in cross-language information retrieval (2005) 0.02 
    0.021602673 = product of:
  0.086410694 = sum of:
    0.086410694 = product of:
      0.12961604 = sum of:
        0.10113043 = weight(_text_:language in 1022) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10113043 = score(doc=1022,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.16497234 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042049456 = queryNorm
            0.6130145 = fieldWeight in 1022, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1022)
        0.028485604 = weight(_text_:22 in 1022) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028485604 = score(doc=1022,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14725003 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042049456 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1022, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1022)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Two probabilistic approaches to cross-lingual retrieval are in wide use today, those based on probabilistic models of relevance, as exemplified by INQUERY, and those based on language modeling. INQUERY, as a query net model, allows the easy incorporation of query operators, including a synonym operator, which has proven to be extremely useful in cross-language information retrieval (CLIR), in an approach often called structured query translation. In contrast, language models incorporate translation probabilities into a unified framework. We compare the two approaches on Arabic and Spanish data sets, using two kinds of bilingual dictionaries--one derived from a conventional dictionary, and one derived from a parallel corpus. We find that structured query processing gives slightly better results when queries are not expanded. On the other hand, when queries are expanded, language modeling gives better results, but only when using a probabilistic dictionary derived from a parallel corpus. We pursue two additional issues inherent in the comparison of structured query processing with language modeling. The first concerns query expansion, and the second is the role of translation probabilities. We compare conventional expansion techniques (pseudo-relevance feedback) with relevance modeling, a new IR approach which fits into the formal framework of language modeling. We find that relevance modeling and pseudo-relevance feedback achieve comparable levels of retrieval and that good translation probabilities confer a small but significant advantage.
    Date
    26.12.2007 20:22:11
  7. Ata, B.M.A.: SISDOM: a multilingual document retrieval system (1995) 0.02 
    0.021149173 = product of:
  0.08459669 = sum of:
    0.08459669 = product of:
      0.12689504 = sum of:
        0.08090435 = weight(_text_:language in 895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08090435 = score(doc=895,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16497234 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042049456 = queryNorm
            0.4904116 = fieldWeight in 895, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=895)
        0.045990683 = weight(_text_:29 in 895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045990683 = score(doc=895,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14791684 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042049456 = queryNorm
            0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 895, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=895)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    The Malay language is widely used in Malaysia, Indonesia and brunei. The growth in the number of documents written in Malay justifies the need for a document retrieval system for that language. Describes the implementation of a bilingual Malay and English full text document retrieval systems: SIStem capaian DOkumen Multilingua (SISDOM), by the Kebangsaan University Malaysia. The system incorporates many facilities for users, including the choice of search techniques, browsing of retrieved documents, and ranking of documents
    Date
    31. 7.1996 9:29:12
  8. Park, J.-r.: Cross-lingual name and subject access : mechanisms and challenge (2007) 0.02 
    0.021080218 = product of:
  0.08432087 = sum of:
    0.08432087 = product of:
      0.12648131 = sum of:
        0.08090435 = weight(_text_:language in 255) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08090435 = score(doc=255,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16497234 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042049456 = queryNorm
            0.4904116 = fieldWeight in 255, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=255)
        0.045576964 = weight(_text_:22 in 255) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045576964 = score(doc=255,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14725003 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042049456 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 255, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=255)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    This paper considers issues surrounding name and subject access across languages and cultures, particularly mechanisms and knowledge organization tools (e.g., cataloging, metadata) for cross-lingual information access. The author examines current mechanisms for cross-lingual name and subject access and identifies major factors that hinder cross-lingual information access. The author provides examples from the Korean language that demonstrate the problems with cross-language name and subject access.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  9. Freitas-Junior, H.R.; Ribeiro-Neto, B.A.; Freitas-Vale, R. de; Laender, A.H.F.; Lima, L.R.S. de: Categorization-driven cross-language retrieval of medical information (2006) 0.02 
    0.019344522 = product of:
  0.07737809 = sum of:
    0.07737809 = product of:
      0.11606713 = sum of:
        0.08758152 = weight(_text_:language in 5282) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08758152 = score(doc=5282,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.16497234 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042049456 = queryNorm
            0.5308861 = fieldWeight in 5282, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5282)
        0.028485604 = weight(_text_:22 in 5282) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028485604 = score(doc=5282,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14725003 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042049456 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5282, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5282)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    The Web has become a large repository of documents (or pages) written in many different languages. In this context, traditional information retrieval (IR) techniques cannot be used whenever the user query and the documents being retrieved are in different languages. To address this problem, new cross-language information retrieval (CLIR) techniques have been proposed. In this work, we describe a method for cross-language retrieval of medical information. This method combines query terms and related medical concepts obtained automatically through a categorization procedure. The medical concepts are used to create a linguistic abstraction that allows retrieval of information in a language-independent way, minimizing linguistic problems such as polysemy. To evaluate our method, we carried out experiments using the OHSUMED test collection, whose documents are written in English, with queries expressed in Portuguese, Spanish, and French. The results indicate that our cross-language retrieval method is as effective as a standard vector space model algorithm operating on queries and documents in the same language. Further, our results are better than previous results in the literature.
    Date
    22. 7.2006 16:46:36
  10. Cao, L.; Leong, M.-K.; Low, H.-B.: Searching heterogeneous multilingual bibliographic sources (1998) 0.02 
    0.01713083 = product of:
  0.06852332 = sum of:
    0.06852332 = product of:
      0.10278498 = sum of:
        0.05720801 = weight(_text_:language in 3564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05720801 = score(doc=3564,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16497234 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042049456 = queryNorm
            0.34677336 = fieldWeight in 3564, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3564)
        0.045576964 = weight(_text_:22 in 3564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045576964 = score(doc=3564,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14725003 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042049456 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3564, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3564)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Propopses a Web-based architecture for searching distributed heterogeneous multi-asian language bibliographic sources, and describes a successful pilot implementation of the system at the Chinese Library (CLib) system developed in Singapore and tested at 2 university libraries and a public library
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:08:06
  11. Bian, G.-W.; Chen, H.-H.: Cross-language information access to multilingual collections on the Internet (2000) 0.02 
    0.015810166 = product of:
  0.06324066 = sum of:
    0.06324066 = product of:
      0.094860986 = sum of:
        0.06067826 = weight(_text_:language in 4436) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06067826 = score(doc=4436,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16497234 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042049456 = queryNorm
            0.3678087 = fieldWeight in 4436, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4436)
        0.034182724 = weight(_text_:22 in 4436) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034182724 = score(doc=4436,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14725003 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042049456 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4436, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4436)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Language barrier is the major problem that people face in searching for, retrieving, and understanding multilingual collections on the Internet. This paper deals with query translation and document translation in a Chinese-English information retrieval system called MTIR. Bilingual dictionary and monolingual corpus-based approaches are adopted to select suitable tranlated query terms. A machine transliteration algorithm is introduced to resolve proper name searching. We consider several design issues for document translation, including which material is translated, what roles the HTML tags play in translation, what the tradeoff is between the speed performance and the translation performance, and what from the translated result is presented in. About 100.000 Web pages translated in the last 4 months of 1997 are used for quantitative study of online and real-time Web page translation
    Date
    16. 2.2000 14:22:39
  12. Seo, H.-C.; Kim, S.-B.; Rim, H.-C.; Myaeng, S.-H.: lmproving query translation in English-Korean Cross-language information retrieval (2005) 0.02 
    0.015810166 = product of:
  0.06324066 = sum of:
    0.06324066 = product of:
      0.094860986 = sum of:
        0.06067826 = weight(_text_:language in 1023) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06067826 = score(doc=1023,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16497234 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042049456 = queryNorm
            0.3678087 = fieldWeight in 1023, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1023)
        0.034182724 = weight(_text_:22 in 1023) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034182724 = score(doc=1023,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14725003 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042049456 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1023, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1023)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Query translation is a viable method for cross-language information retrieval (CLIR), but it suffers from translation ambiguities caused by multiple translations of individual query terms. Previous research has employed various methods for disambiguation, including the method of selecting an individual target query term from multiple candidates by comparing their statistical associations with the candidate translations of other query terms. This paper proposes a new method where we examine all combinations of target query term translations corresponding to the source query terms, instead of looking at the candidates for each query term and selecting the best one at a time. The goodness value for a combination of target query terms is computed based on the association value between each pair of the terms in the combination. We tested our method using the NTCIR-3 English-Korean CLIR test collection. The results show some improvements regardless of the association measures we used.
    Date
    26.12.2007 20:22:38
  13. Fluhr, C.: Crosslingual access to photo databases (2012) 0.02 
    0.015810166 = product of:
  0.06324066 = sum of:
    0.06324066 = product of:
      0.094860986 = sum of:
        0.06067826 = weight(_text_:language in 93) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06067826 = score(doc=93,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16497234 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042049456 = queryNorm
            0.3678087 = fieldWeight in 93, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=93)
        0.034182724 = weight(_text_:22 in 93) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034182724 = score(doc=93,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14725003 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042049456 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 93, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=93)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    This paper is about search of photos in photo databases of agencies which sell photos over the Internet. The problem is far from the behavior of photo databases managed by librarians and also far from the corpora generally used for research purposes. The descriptions use mainly single words and it is well known that it is not the best way to have a good search. This increases the problem of semantic ambiguity. This problem of semantic ambiguity is crucial for cross-language querying. On the other hand, users are not aware of documentation techniques and use generally very simple queries but want to get precise answers. This paper gives the experience gained in a 3 year use (2006-2008) of a cross-language access to several of the main international commercial photo databases. The languages used were French, English, and German.
    Date
    17. 4.2012 14:25:22
  14. Reinisch, F.: Wer suchet - der findet? : oder Die Überwindung der sprachlichen Grenzen bei der Suche in Volltextdatenbanken (2000) 0.02 
    0.015261276 = product of:
  0.061045103 = sum of:
    0.061045103 = product of:
      0.09156765 = sum of:
        0.045990683 = weight(_text_:29 in 4919) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045990683 = score(doc=4919,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14791684 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042049456 = queryNorm
            0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 4919, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4919)
        0.045576964 = weight(_text_:22 in 4919) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045576964 = score(doc=4919,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14725003 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042049456 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4919, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4919)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    22. 7.2000 17:48:06
    Source
    Dokumente und Datenbanken in elektronischen Netzen: Tagungsberichte vom 6. und 7. Österreichischen Online-Informationstreffen bzw. vom 7. und 8. Österreichischen Dokumentartag, Schloß Seggau, Seggauberg bei Leibnitz, 26.-29. September 1995, Congresszentrum Igls bei Innsbruck, 21.-24. Oktober 1997. Hrsg.: E. Pipp
  15. Chen, K.-H.: Evaluating Chinese text retrieval with multilingual queries (2002) 0.02 
    0.01504981 = product of:
  0.06019924 = sum of:
    0.06019924 = product of:
      0.090298854 = sum of:
        0.05005701 = weight(_text_:language in 1851) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05005701 = score(doc=1851,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16497234 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042049456 = queryNorm
            0.30342668 = fieldWeight in 1851, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1851)
        0.040241845 = weight(_text_:29 in 1851) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040241845 = score(doc=1851,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14791684 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042049456 = queryNorm
            0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 1851, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1851)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    This paper reports the design of a Chinese test collection with multilingual queries and the application of this test collection to evaluate information retrieval Systems. The effective indexing units, IR models, translation techniques, and query expansion for Chinese text retrieval are identified. The collaboration of East Asian countries for construction of test collections for cross-language multilingual text retrieval is also discussed in this paper. As well, a tool is designed to help assessors judge relevante and gather the events of relevante judgment. The log file created by this tool will be used to analyze the behaviors of assessors in the future.
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 29(2002) nos.3/4, S.156-170
  16. Chen, H.-H.; Lin, W.-C.; Yang, C.; Lin, W.-H.: Translating-transliterating named entities for multilingual information access (2006) 0.01 
    0.014989476 = product of:
  0.059957903 = sum of:
    0.059957903 = product of:
      0.08993685 = sum of:
        0.05005701 = weight(_text_:language in 1080) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05005701 = score(doc=1080,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16497234 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042049456 = queryNorm
            0.30342668 = fieldWeight in 1080, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1080)
        0.039879844 = weight(_text_:22 in 1080) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.039879844 = score(doc=1080,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14725003 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042049456 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1080, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1080)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Named entities are major constituents of a document but are usually unknown words. This work proposes a systematic way of dealing with formulation, transformation, translation, and transliteration of multilingual-named entities. The rules and similarity matrices for translation and transliteration are learned automatically from parallel-named-entity corpora. The results are applied in cross-language access to collections of images with captions. Experimental results demonstrate that the similarity-based transliteration of named entities is effective, and runs in which transliteration is considered outperform the runs in which it is neglected.
    Date
    4. 6.2006 19:52:22
  17. Ménard, E.: Ordinary image retrieval in a multilingual context : a comparison of two indexing vocabularies (2010) 0.01 
    0.013367226 = product of:
  0.053468905 = sum of:
    0.053468905 = product of:
      0.080203354 = sum of:
        0.05720801 = weight(_text_:language in 3946) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05720801 = score(doc=3946,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.16497234 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042049456 = queryNorm
            0.34677336 = fieldWeight in 3946, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3946)
        0.022995342 = weight(_text_:29 in 3946) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022995342 = score(doc=3946,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14791684 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042049456 = queryNorm
            0.15546128 = fieldWeight in 3946, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3946)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Purpose - This paper seeks to examine image retrieval within two different contexts: a monolingual context where the language of the query is the same as the indexing language and a multilingual context where the language of the query is different from the indexing language. The study also aims to compare two different approaches for the indexing of ordinary images representing common objects: traditional image indexing with the use of a controlled vocabulary and free image indexing using uncontrolled vocabulary. Design/methodology/approach - This research uses three data collection methods. An analysis of the indexing terms was employed in order to examine the multiplicity of term types assigned to images. A simulation of the retrieval process involving a set of 30 images was performed with 60 participants. The quantification of the retrieval performance of each indexing approach was based on the usability measures, that is, effectiveness, efficiency and satisfaction of the user. Finally, a questionnaire was used to gather information on searcher satisfaction during and after the retrieval process. Findings - The results of this research are twofold. The analysis of indexing terms associated with all the 3,950 images provides a comprehensive description of the characteristics of the four non-combined indexing forms used for the study. Also, the retrieval simulation results offers information about the relative performance of the six indexing forms (combined and non-combined) in terms of their effectiveness, efficiency (temporal and human) and the image searcher's satisfaction. Originality/value - The findings of the study suggest that, in the near future, the information systems could benefit from allowing an increased coexistence of controlled vocabularies and uncontrolled vocabularies, resulting from collaborative image tagging, for example, and giving the users the possibility to dynamically participate in the image-indexing process, in a more user-centred way.
    Date
    29. 8.2010 10:51:07
  18. Dabbadie, M.; Blancherie, J.M.: Alexandria, a multilingual dictionary for knowledge management purposes (2006) 0.01 
    0.012848122 = product of:
  0.05139249 = sum of:
    0.05139249 = product of:
      0.07708873 = sum of:
        0.042906005 = weight(_text_:language in 2465) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042906005 = score(doc=2465,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16497234 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042049456 = queryNorm
            0.26008 = fieldWeight in 2465, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2465)
        0.034182724 = weight(_text_:22 in 2465) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034182724 = score(doc=2465,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14725003 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042049456 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2465, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2465)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Alexandria is an innovation of international impact. It is the only multilingual dictionary for websites and PCs. A double click on a word opens a small window that gives interactive translations between 22 languages and includes meaning, synonyms and associated expressions. It is an ASP application grounded on a semantic network that is portable on any operating system or platform. Behind the application is the Integral Dictionary is the semantic network created by Memodata. Alexandria can be customized with specific vocabulary, descriptive articles, images, sounds, videos, etc. Its domains of application are considerable: e-tourism, online medias, language learning, international websites. Alexandria has also proved to be a basic tool for knowledge management purposes. The application can be customized according to a user or an organization needs. An application dedicated to mobile devices is currently being developed. Future developments are planned in the field of e-tourism in relation with French "pôles de compétitivité".
  19. Yamabana, K.; Muraki, K.; Doi, S.; Kamei, S.: ¬A language conversion front-end for cross-language information retrieval (1998) 0.01 
    0.0123859 = product of:
  0.0495436 = sum of:
    0.0495436 = product of:
      0.1486308 = sum of:
        0.1486308 = weight(_text_:language in 6306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1486308 = score(doc=6306,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.16497234 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042049456 = queryNorm
            0.90094376 = fieldWeight in 6306, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6306)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Cross-language information retrieval. Ed.: G. Grefenstette
  20. Airio, E.: Who benefits from CLIR in web retrieval? (2008) 0.01 
    0.011306727 = product of:
  0.04522691 = sum of:
    0.04522691 = product of:
      0.13568072 = sum of:
        0.13568072 = weight(_text_:language in 2342) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13568072 = score(doc=2342,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.16497234 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042049456 = queryNorm
            0.8224453 = fieldWeight in 2342, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2342)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Purpose - The aim of the current paper is to test whether query translation is beneficial in web retrieval. Design/methodology/approach - The language pairs were Finnish-Swedish, English-German and Finnish-French. A total of 12-18 participants were recruited for each language pair. Each participant performed four retrieval tasks. The author's aim was to compare the performance of the translated queries with that of the target language queries. Thus, the author asked participants to formulate a source language query and a target language query for each task. The source language queries were translated into the target language utilizing a dictionary-based system. In English-German, also machine translation was utilized. The author used Google as the search engine. Findings - The results differed depending on the language pair. The author concluded that the dictionary coverage had an effect on the results. On average, the results of query-translation were better than in the traditional laboratory tests. Originality/value - This research shows that query translation in web is beneficial especially for users with moderate and non-active language skills. This is valuable information for developers of cross-language information retrieval systems.

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 159
  • d 14
  • a 1
  • f 1
  • m 1
  • ro 1
  • sp 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 163
  • el 15
  • m 3
  • r 3
  • s 2
  • x 2
  • More… Less…

Themes

Classifications