Search (58 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Suchtaktik"
  1. Jordan, R.P.: Searching for information on tests : reference sources and a search strategy (1995) 0.11
    0.109826624 = product of:
      0.16473994 = sum of:
        0.12820151 = weight(_text_:reference in 1883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12820151 = score(doc=1883,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.205834 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050593734 = queryNorm
            0.62283933 = fieldWeight in 1883, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1883)
        0.036538422 = product of:
          0.073076844 = sum of:
            0.073076844 = weight(_text_:database in 1883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.073076844 = score(doc=1883,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20452234 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.042444 = idf(docFreq=2109, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050593734 = queryNorm
                0.35730496 = fieldWeight in 1883, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.042444 = idf(docFreq=2109, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1883)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Research methodologies in several of the social sciences require the use of tests. When assisting social science researchers who seek information on tests, reference librarians do not, themselves, always have direct access to the instruments. Librarians should not only have the knowledge that various print and electronic database resources are available to gain needed information, but they should also have a strategy by which these sources can be searched in an expedient and thorough manner. This paper offers such a search strategy which can be used with the materials commonly found in a large research or specialized test library
    Source
    Reference librarian. 1995, no.48, S.199-221
  2. Adams, V.M.: Concepts in end-user training : how to convert end users into effective searchers (1997) 0.07
    0.073703736 = product of:
      0.1105556 = sum of:
        0.074017175 = weight(_text_:reference in 766) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.074017175 = score(doc=766,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.205834 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050593734 = queryNorm
            0.35959643 = fieldWeight in 766, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=766)
        0.036538422 = product of:
          0.073076844 = sum of:
            0.073076844 = weight(_text_:database in 766) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.073076844 = score(doc=766,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20452234 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.042444 = idf(docFreq=2109, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050593734 = queryNorm
                0.35730496 = fieldWeight in 766, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.042444 = idf(docFreq=2109, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=766)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Provides guidelines for information professionals running end user search programmes. Covers: the reference interview, evaluation of information sources (purpose, authprity, scope and proposed audience), user aids giving information on access, electronic database procedures, standards, electronic search strategies (logical connectors, proximity connections, limiting searches), and the role of the information centre in supporting end users
  3. Hsieh-Yee, I.: Search tactics of Web users in searching for texts, graphics, known items and subjects : a search simulation study (1998) 0.07
    0.06604756 = product of:
      0.09907133 = sum of:
        0.07850707 = weight(_text_:reference in 2404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07850707 = score(doc=2404,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.205834 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050593734 = queryNorm
            0.38140965 = fieldWeight in 2404, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2404)
        0.020564256 = product of:
          0.041128512 = sum of:
            0.041128512 = weight(_text_:22 in 2404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041128512 = score(doc=2404,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17717063 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050593734 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2404, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2404)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Date
    25.12.1998 19:22:31
    Footnote
    Part of an issue devoted to electronic resources and their use in libraries, from the viewpoint of reference services, with an emphasis on the Internet and Geographic Information Systems
    Source
    Reference librarian. 1998, no.60, S.61-85
  4. McCrank, L.J.: Reference expertise : paradigms, strategies, and systems (1993) 0.06
    0.061061054 = product of:
      0.18318316 = sum of:
        0.18318316 = weight(_text_:reference in 7956) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18318316 = score(doc=7956,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.205834 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050593734 = queryNorm
            0.8899558 = fieldWeight in 7956, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7956)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Past trends in reference instruction, query analysis and proloferation of reference tools classed by primary functions into a general typology anticipated the use of paradigm logic, templates, search strategies, and systematic searching in applied Artificial Intelligence research and design of expert system, especially referral and decision-support systems. The approach, methodologies, and technique employed in basic reference and subject-area reference instruction in four graduate library schools, developed first at the University of Maryland after 1976, are reviewed. The advantages and limitations of the latter are discussed to suggest the interplay of personal service, manual tools, and computerized systems for holistic reference programs. Librarians' transition to the automated tools using AI methods might be improved by introducing paradigms, typologies, strategies, and a systems approach in reference instruction for professionals and more generally in bibliographic instruction
    Source
    Reference librarian. 1993, no.40, S.11-42
  5. Cole, P.F.: ¬The analysis of reference question records as a guide to the information requirements of scientists (1958) 0.04
    0.04317668 = product of:
      0.12953004 = sum of:
        0.12953004 = weight(_text_:reference in 3866) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12953004 = score(doc=3866,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.205834 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050593734 = queryNorm
            0.62929374 = fieldWeight in 3866, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3866)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  6. Cole, C.; Kennedy, L.; Carter, S.: ¬The optimization of online searches through the labelling of a dynamic, situation-dependent information need : the reference interview and online searching for undergraduates doing a social-science assignment (1996) 0.04
    0.04273384 = product of:
      0.12820151 = sum of:
        0.12820151 = weight(_text_:reference in 6918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12820151 = score(doc=6918,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.205834 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050593734 = queryNorm
            0.62283933 = fieldWeight in 6918, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6918)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Proposes a reference interview strategy that will allow the reference librarian to: efficiently assess the information need of undergraduates undertaking a social science assignment, label the information need, and assign the most appropriate online search strategy to satisfy this need
  7. Pomerantz, J.: ¬A linguistic analysis of question taxonomies (2005) 0.04
    0.03739211 = product of:
      0.11217632 = sum of:
        0.11217632 = weight(_text_:reference in 3465) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11217632 = score(doc=3465,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.205834 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050593734 = queryNorm
            0.5449844 = fieldWeight in 3465, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3465)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Recent work in automatic question answering has called for question taxonomies as a critical component of the process of machine understanding of questions. There is a long tradition of classifying questions in library reference services, and digital reference services have a strong need for automation to support scalability. Digital reference and question answering systems have the potential to arrive at a highly fruitful symbiosis. To move towards this goal, an extensive review was conducted of bodies of literature from several fields that deal with questions, to identify question taxonomies that exist in these bodies of literature. In the course of this review, five question taxonomies were identified, at four levels of linguistic analysis.
  8. Jahoda, G.; Braunagel, J.S.: ¬The librarian and reference queries : a systematic approach (1980) 0.04
    0.037008584 = product of:
      0.11102575 = sum of:
        0.11102575 = weight(_text_:reference in 3359) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11102575 = score(doc=3359,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.205834 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050593734 = queryNorm
            0.5393946 = fieldWeight in 3359, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3359)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  9. Vakkari, P.; Pennanen, M.; Serola, S.: Changes of search terms and tactics while writing a research proposal : a longitudinal case study (2003) 0.03
    0.02664893 = product of:
      0.079946786 = sum of:
        0.079946786 = sum of:
          0.045673028 = weight(_text_:database in 1073) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.045673028 = score(doc=1073,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.20452234 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.042444 = idf(docFreq=2109, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050593734 = queryNorm
              0.2233156 = fieldWeight in 1073, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.042444 = idf(docFreq=2109, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1073)
          0.034273762 = weight(_text_:22 in 1073) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.034273762 = score(doc=1073,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17717063 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050593734 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1073, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1073)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The study analyses how students' growing understanding of the topic and search experience were related to their choice of search tactics and terms while preparing a research proposal for a small empirical study. In addition to that, the findings of the study are used to test Vakkari's (2001) theory of task-based IR. The research subjects were 22 students of psychology attending a seminar for preparing the proposal. They made a search for their task in PsychINFO database at the beginning and end of the seminar. Data were collected in several ways. A pre- and post-search interview was conducted in both sessions. The students were asked to think aloud in the sessions. This was recorded as were the transaction logs. The results show that search experience was slightly related to the change of facets. Although the students' vocabulary of the topic grew generating an increased use of specific terms between the sessions, their use of search tactics and operators remained fairly constant. There was no correlation between the terms and tactics used and the total number of useful references found. By comparing these results with the findings of relevant earlier studies the conclusion was drawn that domain knowledge has an impact on searching assuming that users have a sufficient command of the system used. This implies that the tested theory of task-based IR is valid on condition that the searchers are experienced. It is suggested that the theory should be enriched by including search experience in its scope.
  10. Bates, M.J.: Information search tactics (1979) 0.02
    0.024672393 = product of:
      0.074017175 = sum of:
        0.074017175 = weight(_text_:reference in 2407) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.074017175 = score(doc=2407,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.205834 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050593734 = queryNorm
            0.35959643 = fieldWeight in 2407, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2407)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    As part of the study of human information search strategy, the concept of the search tactic, or move made to futher a search, is introduced. 29 search tactics are named, defined, and discussed in 4 categories: monitoring, file structure, search formulation, and term. Implications of the search tactics for research in search strategy are considered. The search tactics are inteded to be practically useful in information searching. This approach to searching is designed to be general, yet nontrivial; it is applicable to both bibliographic and reference searches and in both manual and on-line systems
  11. Ross, C.S.: Finding without seeking : what readers say about the role of pleasure-reading as a source of information (1999) 0.02
    0.02180752 = product of:
      0.06542256 = sum of:
        0.06542256 = weight(_text_:reference in 193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06542256 = score(doc=193,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.205834 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050593734 = queryNorm
            0.31784135 = fieldWeight in 193, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=193)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    It is common to distinguish sharply between leisure reading undertaken purely for pleasure and utilitarian reading that satisfies what Peter Mann (1969, 53-61) has called `extrinsic' interests: reference materials for work and home such as medical books, cook books and repair manuals. We might suppose that information-seeking is concerned only with utilitarian reading. However, once we adopt a definition of information as something that fills in a gap in understanding or makes a difference to an individual's cognitive structure or helps people with their lives, it follows that we cannot deduce uses simply by looking at the texts themselves. Since meanings are constructed by readers, we must ask the readers about the uses they make of texts in the context of their lives. Findings from a research project focussed on 194 readers who read for pleasure indicate that for a broad understanding of the information behaviour of ordinary people, we need to think beyond reference books to include extended narrative forms, particularly biography, history, and fiction. People who are avid readers for pleasure report that during the course of wide reading they serendipitously encounter information that helps them in their lives
  12. Bates, M.J.: Idea tactics (1979) 0.02
    0.02158834 = product of:
      0.06476502 = sum of:
        0.06476502 = weight(_text_:reference in 2406) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06476502 = score(doc=2406,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.205834 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050593734 = queryNorm
            0.31464687 = fieldWeight in 2406, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2406)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    An information search tactic is a move made to further a search. In this article, 17 "idea tactics" are presented: tactics to help generate new ideas or solutions to problems in information searching. The focus of these tactics is psychological; they are intended to help improve the information specialist's thinking and creative processes in searching. The tactics are applicable to all kinds of situations - both bibliographical and reference searches, and in both manual and on-line systems. Research leads for the study of idea tactics are suggested, and experimental design problems associated with the testing of all sorts of search tactics are discussed
  13. Pejtersen, A.M.: Search strategies and database design (1988) 0.02
    0.02131408 = product of:
      0.06394224 = sum of:
        0.06394224 = product of:
          0.12788448 = sum of:
            0.12788448 = weight(_text_:database in 3110) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12788448 = score(doc=3110,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20452234 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.042444 = idf(docFreq=2109, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050593734 = queryNorm
                0.62528366 = fieldWeight in 3110, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.042444 = idf(docFreq=2109, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3110)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  14. Becker, N.J.: Google in perspective: : understanding and enhancing student search skills (2003) 0.02
    0.018504292 = product of:
      0.055512875 = sum of:
        0.055512875 = weight(_text_:reference in 2383) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.055512875 = score(doc=2383,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.205834 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050593734 = queryNorm
            0.2696973 = fieldWeight in 2383, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2383)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    This paper desctibes a study of undergraduate student search behavlour, examines the results through the lens of various disciplines, and provides now insights that will increase our understanding and facilitate the development of mom effetive instructional programmes Perspectives and research results drawn from multiple disciplines are used to explore the role of mental modele, reference groups and habits, and IntelIectual development in the search behaviour demonstrated by the undergraduate students. During interviews conducted as part of the study, many students were able to articulate the importance of source evaluation and describe electronically-appropriate methods for assessing the authority and reliability of Weh based information resources. In practice, however, these students frequently abandoned source evaluation altogether and, following the path of Ieast resistance, relied exclusively on basic Google searching, This approach both compromiscd the quality of their search results and contributed to frustration with the research process. This may not be extraordinarily unusual behaviour, but it is cause for considerable concern among Information literacy programme planners and Instructors. Discussion of the study results and related research is followed by pragmatic suggestions for modifylng ineffective search behaviour through emhanced instructional programmes
  15. Morse, P.M.: Search theory and browsing (1970) 0.02
    0.01827934 = product of:
      0.05483802 = sum of:
        0.05483802 = product of:
          0.10967604 = sum of:
            0.10967604 = weight(_text_:22 in 1448) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10967604 = score(doc=1448,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17717063 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050593734 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 1448, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1448)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 5.2005 19:53:09
  16. Rehkop, B.: 'Quick-and-dirty' company searches : four options (1992) 0.02
    0.018269213 = product of:
      0.054807637 = sum of:
        0.054807637 = product of:
          0.109615274 = sum of:
            0.109615274 = weight(_text_:database in 4296) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.109615274 = score(doc=4296,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20452234 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.042444 = idf(docFreq=2109, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050593734 = queryNorm
                0.53595746 = fieldWeight in 4296, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.042444 = idf(docFreq=2109, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4296)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Database. 15(1992) no.6, S.40-43
  17. Shuman, B.A.: Cases in online search strategy (1993) 0.02
    0.018269213 = product of:
      0.054807637 = sum of:
        0.054807637 = product of:
          0.109615274 = sum of:
            0.109615274 = weight(_text_:database in 702) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.109615274 = score(doc=702,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20452234 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.042444 = idf(docFreq=2109, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050593734 = queryNorm
                0.53595746 = fieldWeight in 702, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.042444 = idf(docFreq=2109, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=702)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Series
    Database searching series; no.5
  18. Snow, B.: ¬The Internet's hidden content and how to find it (2000) 0.02
    0.018269213 = product of:
      0.054807637 = sum of:
        0.054807637 = product of:
          0.109615274 = sum of:
            0.109615274 = weight(_text_:database in 4801) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.109615274 = score(doc=4801,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20452234 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.042444 = idf(docFreq=2109, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050593734 = queryNorm
                0.53595746 = fieldWeight in 4801, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.042444 = idf(docFreq=2109, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4801)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Footnote
    Vgl. auch: Notess, G.R.: Searching the hidden Internet. in: Database 20(1997) no.3, S.37-40.
  19. Morse, P.M.: Browsing and search theory (1973) 0.02
    0.015994422 = product of:
      0.047983266 = sum of:
        0.047983266 = product of:
          0.09596653 = sum of:
            0.09596653 = weight(_text_:22 in 3339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09596653 = score(doc=3339,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17717063 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050593734 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3339, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3339)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 5.2005 19:52:29
  20. Branch, J.L.: Investigating the information-seeking process of adolescents : the value of using think alouds and think afters (2000) 0.02
    0.015994422 = product of:
      0.047983266 = sum of:
        0.047983266 = product of:
          0.09596653 = sum of:
            0.09596653 = weight(_text_:22 in 3924) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09596653 = score(doc=3924,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17717063 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050593734 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3924, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3924)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Library and information science research. 22(2000) no.4, S.371-382

Years

Languages

  • e 57
  • d 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 55
  • m 3
  • More… Less…