Search (36 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Katalogfragen allgemein"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Lubetzky, S.: Writings on the classical art of cataloging (2001) 0.06 
    0.060484428 = product of:
  0.15121107 = sum of:
    0.06638607 = weight(_text_:21 in 2622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06638607 = score(doc=2622,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16162895 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052173212 = queryNorm
        0.41073132 = fieldWeight in 2622, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2622)
    0.084825 = weight(_text_:22 in 2622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.084825 = score(doc=2622,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1827017 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052173212 = queryNorm
        0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2622, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2622)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Date
    21. 1.2016 14:08:39
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Technicalities 22(2002) no.1, S.19-20 (S.S. Intner)
  2. Schneider, R.: OPACs, Benutzer und das Web (2009) 0.04 
    0.040322956 = product of:
  0.10080738 = sum of:
    0.04425738 = weight(_text_:21 in 2905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04425738 = score(doc=2905,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16162895 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052173212 = queryNorm
        0.27382088 = fieldWeight in 2905, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2905)
    0.056550004 = weight(_text_:22 in 2905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.056550004 = score(doc=2905,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1827017 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052173212 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2905, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2905)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Date
    17.12.1996 21:11:09
    22. 2.2009 18:50:43
  3. Bates, M.J.: Speculations on browsing, directed searching, and linking in relation to the Bradford distribution (2002) 0.03 
    0.030242214 = product of:
  0.075605534 = sum of:
    0.033193033 = weight(_text_:21 in 54) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.033193033 = score(doc=54,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16162895 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052173212 = queryNorm
        0.20536566 = fieldWeight in 54, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=54)
    0.0424125 = weight(_text_:22 in 54) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0424125 = score(doc=54,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1827017 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052173212 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 54, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=54)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Date
    22. 2.2007 18:56:23
    Source
    Emerging frameworks and methods: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on the Conceptions of Library and Information Science (CoLIS4), Seattle, WA, July 21 - 25, 2002. Eds.: Fidel, R., H. Bruce, P. Ingwersen u. P. Vakkari
  4. DeZelar-Tiedman, V.: Doing the LibraryThing(TM) in an academic library catalog (2008) 0.02 
    0.020161478 = product of:
  0.05040369 = sum of:
    0.02212869 = weight(_text_:21 in 2666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02212869 = score(doc=2666,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16162895 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052173212 = queryNorm
        0.13691044 = fieldWeight in 2666, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2666)
    0.028275002 = weight(_text_:22 in 2666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.028275002 = score(doc=2666,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1827017 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052173212 = queryNorm
        0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2666, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2666)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Many libraries and other cultural institutions are incorporating Web 2.0 features and enhanced metadata into their catalogs (Trant 2006). These value-added elements include those typically found in commercial and social networking sites, such as book jacket images, reviews, and usergenerated tags. One such site that libraries are exploring as a model is LibraryThing (www.librarything.com) LibraryThing is a social networking site that allows users to "catalog" their own book collections. Members can add tags and reviews to records for books, as well as engage in online discussions. In addition to its service for individuals, LibraryThing offers a feebased service to libraries, where institutions can add LibraryThing tags, recommendations, and other features to their online catalog records. This poster will present data analyzing the quality and quantity of the metadata that a large academic library would expect to gain if utilizing such a service, focusing on the overlap between titles found in the library's catalog and in LibraryThing's database, and on a comparison between the controlled subject headings in the former and the user-generated tags in the latter. During February through April 2008, a random sample of 383 titles from the University of Minnesota Libraries catalog was searched in LibraryThing. Eighty works, or 21 percent of the sample, had corresponding records available in LibraryThing. Golder and Huberman (2006) outline the advantages and disadvantages of using controlled vocabulary for subject access to information resources versus the growing trend of tags supplied by users or by content creators. Using the 80 matched records from the sample, comparisons were made between the user-supplied tags in LibraryThing (social tags) and the subject headings in the library catalog records (controlled vocabulary system). In the library records, terms from all 6XX MARC fields were used. To make a more meaningful comparison, controlled subject terms were broken down into facets according to their headings and subheadings, and each unique facet counted separately. A total of 227 subject terms were applied to the 80 catalog records, an average of 2.84 per record. In LibraryThing, 698 tags were applied to the same 80 titles, an average of 8.73 per title. The poster will further explore the relationships between the terms applied in each source, and identify where overlaps and complementary levels of access occur.
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
  5. Managing cataloging and the organization of information : philosophies, practices and challenges at the onset of the 21st century (2000) 0.02 
    0.017641291 = product of:
  0.044103228 = sum of:
    0.019362604 = weight(_text_:21 in 238) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.019362604 = score(doc=238,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16162895 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052173212 = queryNorm
        0.11979663 = fieldWeight in 238, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=238)
    0.024740625 = weight(_text_:22 in 238) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.024740625 = score(doc=238,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1827017 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052173212 = queryNorm
        0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 238, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=238)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Footnote
    Rez. in ZfBB 51(2004) H.1, S.54-55 (G. Pflug): "Unter dem wachsenden Einfluss der Informationstechnologie auf den Bibliotheksbereich nimmt die Katalogisierung eine Schlüsselstellung ein. Das vorliegende Werk gliedert sich in zwei Teile. Der erste Abschnitt ist mit »National Libraries« überschrieben, befasst sich jedoch nur mit der Library of Congress und der National Library of Canada. Ihm folgen Artikel über »Libraries around the world«. Dabei fälltjedoch auf, dass diese Studien zwar Bibliotheken in Großbritannien, Australien, Mittel- und Südamerika und selbst Afrika (Botswana) behandeln, nicht jedoch aus Kontinentaleuropa, trotz entsprechender Aktivitäten etwa in den Niederlanden, in Frankreich oder den deutschsprachigen Ländern. Nur DOBIS/LIBIS wird erwähnt, aber nur, weil es für kurze Zeit die kanadische Entwicklung beeinflusst hat. Im zweiten Teil kommen Katalogisierungsfachleute aus vier Spezial- und neun akademischen Bibliotheken - ausschließlich aus Nordamerika und Großbritannien - zu Wort. So enthält das Werk in 22 Beispielen Berichte über individuelle und regionale Lösungen. Dabei steht die Frage im Vordergrund, zu welchen Änderungen in der Katalogisierungs- und Sacherschließungspraxis die neuen elektronischen Techniken geführt haben. So streben z.B. die englischen Hochschulbibliotheken ein koordiniertes System an. Mit dem Übergang der British Library zu MARC 21 wird das Katalogsystem in Großbritannien nachhaltig beeinflusst - um nur zwei nahe liegende Beispiele zu nennen. Insgesamt werden drei Aspekte behandelt, die Automatisierungstechnik; die dabei einzusetzende Kooperation und das Outsourcing - nicht nur durch Übernahme von Daten anderer Bibliotheken oder durch Verbundsysteme, vor allem der Library of Congress, sondern auch durch Buchhandelsfirmen wie Blackwell North America Authority Control Service. In der Frage der Sacherschließung befassen sich die Beiträge mit den im amerikanischen Bereich üblichen Klassifikationssystemen, vor allem der Colon Classification, Dewey in seinen beiden Formen oder der Library of Congress Classification. Für die deutsche Diskussion sind diese Aspekte vor allem wegen des Übergangs der Deutschen Bibliothek in ihrer Nationalbibliografie zur DDC von großem Interesse (vgl. Magda Heiner-Freiling: Die DDC in der Deutschen Nationalbibliografie. In Dialog mit Bibliotheken. 15. 2003, Nr. 3, S. 8-13). Doch stellen auch die unterschiedlichen Überlegungen zur alphabetischen Katalogisierung, verbunden mit den da zugehörigen Datenbanken, einen interessanten Beitrag zur augenblicklichen Diskussion in Deutschland dar, da auch hier seit einigen Jahren die Katalogisierung nach RAK und ihre Ablösung eine lebhafte Diskussion ausgelöst hat, wie unter anderem der zusammenfassende Beitrag von Elisabeth Niggemann in: Dialog mit Bibliotheken (15. 2003, Nr. 2, S. 4-8) zeigt. Auch die angloamerikanischen und die mit ihnen zum Beispiel in Mexiko, Südamerika oder Australien verbundenen Bibliotheken - das zeigt das Buch deutlich - diskutieren die Frage der alphabetischen Katalogisierung kontrovers. So werden z.B. neben den dominanten AACR-Regeln mit ihrer Weiterentwicklung mehr als zehn andere Katalogisierungssysteme und rund 20 Online-Datenbanken behandelt. Damit liefert das Buch für die Diskussion in Deutschland und die anstehenden Entscheidungen in seiner Grundtendenz wie in den unterschiedlichen-auch widersprüchlichen-Aspekten dereinzelnen Beiträge wertvolle Anregungen."
  6. Bolin, M.K.: Catalog design, catalog maintenance, catalog governance (2000) 0.02 
    0.015490084 = product of:
  0.07745042 = sum of:
    0.07745042 = weight(_text_:21 in 493) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07745042 = score(doc=493,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16162895 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052173212 = queryNorm
        0.47918653 = fieldWeight in 493, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=493)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    21. 4.2002 18:46:29
  7. Aliprand, J.M.: ¬The Unicode Standard : its scope, design prin. ciples, and prospects for international cataloging (2000) 0.01 
    0.014137501 = product of:
  0.0706875 = sum of:
    0.0706875 = weight(_text_:22 in 4608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0706875 = score(doc=4608,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1827017 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052173212 = queryNorm
        0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4608, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4608)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  8. Petek, M.: Konzeptualni modelni na podrocju knjiznicnih katalogov (2000) 0.01 
    0.013277213 = product of:
  0.06638607 = sum of:
    0.06638607 = weight(_text_:21 in 5178) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06638607 = score(doc=5178,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16162895 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052173212 = queryNorm
        0.41073132 = fieldWeight in 5178, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5178)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:21:15
  9. LeBlanc, J.; Kurth, M.: ¬An operational model for library metadata maintenance (2008) 0.01 
    0.011996068 = product of:
  0.05998034 = sum of:
    0.05998034 = weight(_text_:22 in 101) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05998034 = score(doc=101,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.1827017 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052173212 = queryNorm
        0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 101, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=101)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    19. 6.2010 19:22:28
  10. El-Sherbini, M.A.: Cataloging and classification : review of the literature 2005-06 (2008) 0.01 
    0.011310001 = product of:
  0.056550004 = sum of:
    0.056550004 = weight(_text_:22 in 249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.056550004 = score(doc=249,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1827017 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052173212 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 249, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=249)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  11. Budd, J.: Exploring categorization : undergraduate student searching and the evolution of catalogs (2007) 0.01 
    0.011310001 = product of:
  0.056550004 = sum of:
    0.056550004 = weight(_text_:22 in 256) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.056550004 = score(doc=256,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1827017 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052173212 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 256, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=256)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  12. Miksa, S.D.: ¬The challenges of change : a review of cataloging and classification literature, 2003-2004 (2007) 0.01 
    0.011310001 = product of:
  0.056550004 = sum of:
    0.056550004 = weight(_text_:22 in 266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.056550004 = score(doc=266,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1827017 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052173212 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 266, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=266)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  13. Oberhauser, O.: Teil 2: Ergebnisse der Befragung : Web-Umfrage zur Benutzung von Card-Image Online-Katalogen (2002) 0.01 
    0.011064345 = product of:
  0.055321723 = sum of:
    0.055321723 = weight(_text_:21 in 983) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.055321723 = score(doc=983,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16162895 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052173212 = queryNorm
        0.3422761 = fieldWeight in 983, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=983)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    29. 9.2002 14:56:21
  14. Lewandowski, D.: Suchmaschinen als Konkurrenten der Bibliothekskataloge : Wie Bibliotheken ihre Angebote durch Suchmaschinentechnologie attraktiver und durch Öffnung für die allgemeinen Suchmaschinen populärer machen können (2006) 0.01 
    0.010953143 = product of:
  0.054765716 = sum of:
    0.054765716 = weight(_text_:21 in 3449) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.054765716 = score(doc=3449,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.16162895 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052173212 = queryNorm
        0.33883607 = fieldWeight in 3449, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3449)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    17.12.1996 21:11:09
    21. 4.2006 11:28:13
  15. Erdei, K.: Kein Umzug für Zettel : Die digitalisierten Kataloge im Neubau der UB Kiel (2001) 0.01 
    0.00989625 = product of:
  0.04948125 = sum of:
    0.04948125 = weight(_text_:22 in 5777) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04948125 = score(doc=5777,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1827017 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052173212 = queryNorm
        0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5777, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5777)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    28. 4.2001 16:49:22
  16. Bowman, J.H.: ¬The catalog as barrier to retrieval : Part 1: hyphens and ampersands in titles (2000) 0.01 
    0.00989625 = product of:
  0.04948125 = sum of:
    0.04948125 = weight(_text_:22 in 5365) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04948125 = score(doc=5365,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1827017 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052173212 = queryNorm
        0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5365, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5365)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    An Internet survey of 38 different OPAC systems, at eighty different libraries, was undertaken to investigate the effect on retrieval of the presence of the hyphen or the ampersand in titles. Title and Keyword searches were performed. In Title search, 22 of the systems treat the hyphen as equivalent to a space, while in Keyword the number is 16. The other systems treat it in various different ways (even including the equivalent of NOT), which means that results of searching multiple catalogs are very inconsistent. The ampersand may be ignored, treated as a special character, or treated as "and," again with very inconsistent results. Various recommendations are made with a view to improving consistency of performance.
  17. Marcum, D.B.: ¬The future of cataloging (2006) 0.01 
    0.00989625 = product of:
  0.04948125 = sum of:
    0.04948125 = weight(_text_:22 in 114) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04948125 = score(doc=114,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1827017 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052173212 = queryNorm
        0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 114, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=114)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  18. Eversberg, B.: Navigare necesse est : oder: Wie knüpft man die richtigen Beziehungen? (2006) 0.01 
    0.008851476 = product of:
  0.04425738 = sum of:
    0.04425738 = weight(_text_:21 in 1948) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04425738 = score(doc=1948,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16162895 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052173212 = queryNorm
        0.27382088 = fieldWeight in 1948, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1948)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    12. 7.2008 10:21:23
  19. Neubauer, W.: Von Bibliothekskatalogen zu Wissensportalen (2006) 0.01 
    0.0084825 = product of:
  0.0424125 = sum of:
    0.0424125 = weight(_text_:22 in 1757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0424125 = score(doc=1757,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1827017 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052173212 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1757, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1757)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    22. 3.2008 12:40:17
  20. Arsenault, C.; Ménard, E.: Searching titles with initial articles in library catalogs : a case study and search behavior analysis (2007) 0.01 
    0.0084825 = product of:
  0.0424125 = sum of:
    0.0424125 = weight(_text_:22 in 2264) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0424125 = score(doc=2264,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1827017 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052173212 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2264, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2264)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22

Authors

Languages

  • e 21
  • d 14
  • slv 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 31
  • b 3
  • m 3
  • el 1
  • r 1
  • s 1
  • More… Less…

Themes