Search (2211 results, page 1 of 111)

0.20940182 = product of:
  0.41880363 = sum of:
    0.41880363 = sum of:
      0.37297964 = weight(_text_:25964 in 749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.37297964 = score(doc=749,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.40591347 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.401051 = idf(docFreq=26, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04831699 = queryNorm
          0.9188649 = fieldWeight in 749, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            8.401051 = idf(docFreq=26, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=749)
      0.04582399 = weight(_text_:22 in 749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04582399 = score(doc=749,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16919786 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04831699 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 749, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=749)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

8.12.2007 19:25:22

Object

ISO 25964

0.13266876 = product of:
  0.26533753 = sum of:
    0.26533753 = sum of:
      0.22605981 = weight(_text_:25964 in 1181) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.22605981 = score(doc=1181,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.40591347 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.401051 = idf(docFreq=26, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04831699 = queryNorm
          0.55691624 = fieldWeight in 1181, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            8.401051 = idf(docFreq=26, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1181)
      0.039277706 = weight(_text_:22 in 1181) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.039277706 = score(doc=1181,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16919786 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04831699 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1181, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1181)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

The Nuovo soggettario, the official Italian subject indexing system edited by the National Central Library of Florence, is made up of interactive components, the core of which is a general thesaurus and some rules of a conventional syntax for subject string construction. The Nuovo soggettario Thesaurus is in compliance with ISO 25964: 2011-2013, IFLA LRM, and FAIR principle (findability, accessibility, interoperability, and reusability). Its open data are available in the Zthes, MARC21, and in SKOS formats and allow for interoperability with l library, archive, and museum databases. The Thesaurus's macrostructure is organized into four fundamental macro-categories, thirteen categories, and facets. The facets allow for the orderly development of hierarchies, thereby limiting polyhierarchies and promoting the grouping of homogenous concepts. This paper addresses the main features and peculiarities which have characterized the consistent development of this categorical structure and its effects on the syntactic sphere in a predominantly pre-coordinated usage context.

Date

26.11.2023 18:59:22

0.13186821 = product of:
  0.26373643 = sum of:
    0.26373643 = product of:
      0.52747285 = sum of:
        0.52747285 = weight(_text_:25964 in 4832) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.52747285 = score(doc=4832,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.40591347 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.401051 = idf(docFreq=26, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04831699 = queryNorm
            1.2994711 = fieldWeight in 4832, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              8.401051 = idf(docFreq=26, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4832)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

ISO 25964-2:2013 is applicable to thesauri and other types of vocabulary that are commonly used for information retrieval. It describes, compares and contrasts the elements and features of these vocabularies that are implicated when interoperability is needed. It gives recommendations for the establishment and maintenance of mappings between multiple thesauri, or between thesauri and other types of vocabularies.

Object

ISO 25964

Series

ISO 25964-2:2013(E)

0.09788677 = product of:
  0.19577354 = sum of:
    0.19577354 = product of:
      0.39154708 = sum of:
        0.39154708 = weight(_text_:25964 in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.39154708 = score(doc=862,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.40591347 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.401051 = idf(docFreq=26, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04831699 = queryNorm
            0.96460724 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              8.401051 = idf(docFreq=26, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

International standard ISO 25964-1:2011 - Thesauri for information retrieval, includes a detailed data model for thesaurus structure. It is intended to provide a rigorous presentation of the elements and relationships which will not only clarify and standardise the varying and conflicting interpretations which exist but which can also be implemented consistently in automated systems. It makes a clear distinction between concepts and the terms which are used to label them, and includes other features that may be present in a thesaurus, such as compound equivalence, arrays and node labels, concept groups, notes and version history.

Object

ISO 25964

0.09637904 = sum of:
  0.07674019 = product of:
    0.23022056 = sum of:
      0.23022056 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.23022056 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.40963197 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04831699 = queryNorm
          0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.019638853 = product of:
    0.039277706 = sum of:
      0.039277706 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.039277706 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16919786 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04831699 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.

Date

8. 1.2013 10:22:32

0.08477242 = product of:
  0.16954485 = sum of:
    0.16954485 = product of:
      0.3390897 = sum of:
        0.3390897 = weight(_text_:25964 in 1169) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.3390897 = score(doc=1169,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.40591347 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.401051 = idf(docFreq=26, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04831699 = queryNorm
            0.83537436 = fieldWeight in 1169, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              8.401051 = idf(docFreq=26, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1169)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

T.1: Today's thesauri are mostly electronic tools, having moved on from the paper-based era when thesaurus standards were first developed. They are built and maintained with the support of software and need to integrate with other software, such as search engines and content management systems. Whereas in the past thesauri were designed for information professionals trained in indexing and searching, today there is a demand for vocabularies that untrained users will find to be intuitive. ISO 25964 makes the transition needed for the world of electronic information management. However, part 1 retains the assumption that human intellect is usually involved in the selection of indexing terms and in the selection of search terms. If both the indexer and the searcher are guided to choose the same term for the same concept, then relevant documents will be retrieved. This is the main principle underlying thesaurus design, even though a thesaurus built for human users may also be applied in situations where computers make the choices. Efficient exchange of data is a vital component of thesaurus management and exploitation. Hence the inclusion in this standard of recommendations for exchange formats and protocols. Adoption of these will facilitate interoperability between thesaurus management systems and the other computer applications, such as indexing and retrieval systems, that will utilize the data. Thesauri are typically used in post-coordinate retrieval systems, but may also be applied to hierarchical directories, pre-coordinate indexes and classification systems. Increasingly, thesaurus applications need to mesh with others, such as automatic categorization schemes, free-text search systems, etc. Part 2 of ISO 25964 describes additional types of structured vocabulary and gives recommendations to enable interoperation of the vocabularies at all stages of the information storage and retrieval process.
T.2: The ability to identify and locate relevant information among vast collections and other resources is a major and pressing challenge today. Several different types of vocabulary are in use for this purpose. Some of the most widely used vocabularies were designed a hundred years ago and have been evolving steadily. A different generation of vocabularies is now emerging, designed to exploit the electronic media more effectively. A good understanding of the previous generation is still essential for effective access to collections indexed with them. An important object of ISO 25964 as a whole is to support data exchange and other forms of interoperability in circumstances in which more than one structured vocabulary is applied within one retrieval system or network. Sometimes one vocabulary has to be mapped to another, and it is important to understand both the potential and the limitations of such mappings. In other systems, a thesaurus is mapped to a classification scheme, or an ontology to a thesaurus. Comprehensive interoperability needs to cover the whole range of vocabulary types, whether young or old. Concepts in different vocabularies are related only in that they have the same or similar meaning. However, the meaning can be found in a number of different aspects within each particular type of structured vocabulary: - within terms or captions selected in different languages; - in the notation assigned indicating a place within a larger hierarchy; - in the definition, scope notes, history notes and other notes that explain the significance of that concept; and - in explicit relationships to other concepts or entities within the same vocabulary. In order to create mappings from one structured vocabulary to another it is first necessary to understand, within the context of each different type of structured vocabulary, the significance and relative importance of each of the different elements in defining the meaning of that particular concept. ISO 25964-1 describes the key characteristics of thesauri along with additional advice on best practice. ISO 25964-2 focuses on other types of vocabulary and does not attempt to cover all aspects of good practice. It concentrates on those aspects which need to be understood if one of the vocabularies is to work effectively alongside one or more of the others. Recognizing that a new standard cannot be applied to some existing vocabularies, this part of ISO 25964 provides informative description alongside the recommendations, the aim of which is to enable users and system developers to interpret and implement the existing vocabularies effectively. The remainder of ISO 25964-2 deals with the principles and practicalities of establishing mappings between vocabularies.

Object

ISO 25964

0.07992421 = product of:
  0.15984842 = sum of:
    0.15984842 = product of:
      0.31969684 = sum of:
        0.31969684 = weight(_text_:25964 in 535) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.31969684 = score(doc=535,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.40591347 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.401051 = idf(docFreq=26, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04831699 = queryNorm
            0.7875985 = fieldWeight in 535, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.401051 = idf(docFreq=26, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=535)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Object

ISO NP 25964

0.07992421 = product of:
  0.15984842 = sum of:
    0.15984842 = product of:
      0.31969684 = sum of:
        0.31969684 = weight(_text_:25964 in 2826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.31969684 = score(doc=2826,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.40591347 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.401051 = idf(docFreq=26, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04831699 = queryNorm
            0.7875985 = fieldWeight in 2826, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.401051 = idf(docFreq=26, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2826)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

This paper is aimed at assessing the potential of interoperable knowledge organization systems to respond to search strategies in order to retrieve information from databases in the areas of health and biomedicine. An analysis was done on the semantic consistency of synonym grouping of a term selected from the Metathesaurus, the Unified Medical Language System of the National Library of Medicine, based on the characteristics of equivalence proposed in ISO 25964: 2: 2011 and based on the following categories: semantic, morphological, syntactic and typographical variations. This paper highlights the importance of understanding the results of automatic mapping as well as the need for characterization, evaluation and selection of equivalences for preparation of consistent search strategies and presentation of search results in scientific work methodologies.

Object

ISO 25964-2

0.06395016 = product of:
  0.12790032 = sum of:
    0.12790032 = product of:
      0.38370094 = sum of:
        0.38370094 = weight(_text_:3a in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.38370094 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.40963197 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04831699 = queryNorm
            0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F3131107&ei=HzFWVYvGMsiNsgGTyoFI&usg=AFQjCNE2FHUeR9oQTQlNC4TPedv4Mo3DaQ&sig2=Rlzpr7a3BLZZkqZCXXN_IA&bvm=bv.93564037,d.bGg&cad=rja

0.056514952 = product of:
  0.113029905 = sum of:
    0.113029905 = product of:
      0.22605981 = sum of:
        0.22605981 = weight(_text_:25964 in 6033) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.22605981 = score(doc=6033,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.40591347 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.401051 = idf(docFreq=26, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04831699 = queryNorm
            0.55691624 = fieldWeight in 6033, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.401051 = idf(docFreq=26, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6033)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

Programm mit Links auf die Präsentationen: Armando Stellato, Ahsan Morshed, Gudrun Johannsen, Yves Jacques, Caterina Caracciolo, Sachit Rajbhandari, Imma Subirats, Johannes Keizer: A Collaborative Framework for Managing and Publishing KOS - Christian Mader, Bernhard Haslhofer: Quality Criteria for Controlled Web Vocabularies - Ahsan Morshed, Benjamin Zapilko, Gudrun Johannsen, Philipp Mayr, Johannes Keizer: Evaluating approaches to automatically match thesauri from different domains for Linked Open Data - Johan De Smedt: SKOS extensions to cover mapping requirements - Mark Tomko: Translating biological data sets Into Linked Data - Daniel Kless: Ontologies and thesauri - similarities and differences - Antoine Isaac, Jacco van Ossenbruggen: Europeana and semantic alignment of vocabularies - Douglas Tudhope: Complementary use of ontologies and (other) KOS - Wilko van Hoek, Brigitte Mathiak, Philipp Mayr, Sascha Schüller: Comparing the accuracy of the semantic similarity provided by the Normalized Google Distance (NGD) and the Search Term Recommender (STR) - Denise Bedford: Selecting and Weighting Semantically Discovered Concepts as Social Tags - Stella Dextre Clarke, Johan De Smedt. ISO 25964-1: a new standard for development of thesauri and exchange of thesaurus data

0.056514952 = product of:
  0.113029905 = sum of:
    0.113029905 = product of:
      0.22605981 = sum of:
        0.22605981 = weight(_text_:25964 in 4788) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.22605981 = score(doc=4788,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.40591347 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.401051 = idf(docFreq=26, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04831699 = queryNorm
            0.55691624 = fieldWeight in 4788, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.401051 = idf(docFreq=26, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4788)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Object

ISO 25964

0.056514952 = product of:
  0.113029905 = sum of:
    0.113029905 = product of:
      0.22605981 = sum of:
        0.22605981 = weight(_text_:25964 in 2113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.22605981 = score(doc=2113,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.40591347 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.401051 = idf(docFreq=26, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04831699 = queryNorm
            0.55691624 = fieldWeight in 2113, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.401051 = idf(docFreq=26, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2113)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

For some years mapping has been one of the main tasks in the EDUG member countries. While the ISO standard on mapping and interoperability with other vocabularies (ISO 25964-2) gives some advice on creating mappings between a thesaurus and e.g. a classification system, it does not deal with Dewey Decimal Classification specifically. The EDUG members have felt a growing need to discuss and record the knowledge acquired in mapping projects where either the source or the target vocabulary is DDC. The recommendations below are the result of a seminar on mapping in connection with the EDUG annual meeting in April 2015. The recommendations are not exhaustive and will be subject to change as EDUG members gain more experience in this field of work. We still hope that institutions planning to embark on a mapping project to/from DDC, may find the guidelines helpful.

0.051160127 = product of:
  0.102320254 = sum of:
    0.102320254 = product of:
      0.30696076 = sum of:
        0.30696076 = weight(_text_:3a in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.30696076 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.40963197 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04831699 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

https%3A%2F%2Ftannerlectures.utah.edu%2F_documents%2Fa-to-z%2Fp%2Fpopper80.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3f4QRTEH-OEBmoYr2J_c7H

0.04709579 = product of:
  0.09419158 = sum of:
    0.09419158 = product of:
      0.18838316 = sum of:
        0.18838316 = weight(_text_:25964 in 3695) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18838316 = score(doc=3695,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.40591347 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.401051 = idf(docFreq=26, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04831699 = queryNorm
            0.46409684 = fieldWeight in 3695, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.401051 = idf(docFreq=26, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3695)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

The concepts of simplicity and complexity play major roles in information storage and retrieval in knowledge organizations. This paper reports an investigation of these concepts in the structure of descriptors. The main purpose of simplicity is to decrease the number of words in the construction of descriptors as this idea affects semantic relations, recall and precision. ISO 25964 has affirmed the purpose of simplicity by requiring splitting compound terms into simpler concepts. This work aims to elaborate the standard methods of evaluation by providing a more detailed evaluation of the descriptors structure and identifying effective factors in simplicity and complexity results in the structure of thesauri descriptors. The research population is taken from the descriptors of the Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux (CAB) Thesaurus, the Persian Cultural Thesaurus (ASFA) and the Chemical Thesaurus. This research was conducted using the statistical and content analysis method. In this research we propose a new quantitative approach as well as novel indicators and indices involving Simplicity and Factoring Ratios to evaluate the descriptors structure. The results will be useful in the verification, selection and maintenance purposes in knowledge organizations and the inquiry method can be further developed in the field of ontology evaluation.

0.04709579 = product of:
  0.09419158 = sum of:
    0.09419158 = product of:
      0.18838316 = sum of:
        0.18838316 = weight(_text_:25964 in 1827) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18838316 = score(doc=1827,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.40591347 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.401051 = idf(docFreq=26, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04831699 = queryNorm
            0.46409684 = fieldWeight in 1827, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.401051 = idf(docFreq=26, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1827)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Object

ISO 25964-2

0.04709579 = product of:
  0.09419158 = sum of:
    0.09419158 = product of:
      0.18838316 = sum of:
        0.18838316 = weight(_text_:25964 in 5997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18838316 = score(doc=5997,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.40591347 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.401051 = idf(docFreq=26, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04831699 = queryNorm
            0.46409684 = fieldWeight in 5997, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.401051 = idf(docFreq=26, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5997)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Thesauri are Knowledge Organization Systems (KOS), that arise from the consensus of wide communities. They have been in use for many years and are regularly updated. Whereas in the past thesauri were designed for information professionals for indexing and searching, today there is a demand for conceptual vocabularies that enable inferencing by machines. The development of the Semantic Web has brought a new opportunity for thesauri, but thesauri also face the challenge of proving that they add value to it. The evolution of thesauri toward their integration with the Semantic Web is examined. Elements and structures in the thesaurus standard, ISO 25964, and SKOS (Simple Knowledge Organization System), the Semantic Web standard for representing KOS, are reviewed and compared. Moreover, the integrity rules of thesauri are contrasted with the axioms of SKOS. How SKOS has been applied to represent some real thesauri is taken into account. Three thesauri are chosen for this aim: AGROVOC, EuroVoc and the UNESCO Thesaurus. Based on the results of this comparison and analysis, the benefits that Semantic Web technologies offer to thesauri, how thesauri can contribute to the Semantic Web, and the challenges that would help to improve their integration with the Semantic Web are discussed.

0.046622455 = product of:
  0.09324491 = sum of:
    0.09324491 = product of:
      0.18648982 = sum of:
        0.18648982 = weight(_text_:25964 in 963) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18648982 = score(doc=963,freq=1.0), product of:
            0.40591347 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.401051 = idf(docFreq=26, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04831699 = queryNorm
            0.45943245 = fieldWeight in 963, product of:
              1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
                1.0 = termFreq=1.0
              8.401051 = idf(docFreq=26, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=963)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

25964

0.04476511 = product of:
  0.08953022 = sum of:
    0.08953022 = product of:
      0.26859066 = sum of:
        0.26859066 = weight(_text_:3a in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.26859066 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.40963197 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04831699 = queryNorm
            0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/login.jsp?tp=&arnumber=5386707&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fxpls%2Fabs_all.jsp%3Farnumber%3D5386707.

0.038370095 = product of:
  0.07674019 = sum of:
    0.07674019 = product of:
      0.23022056 = sum of:
        0.23022056 = weight(_text_:3a in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.23022056 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.40963197 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04831699 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Footnote

Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplore/login.jsp?reload=true&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fiel5%2F4755313%2F4755314%2F04755480.pdf%3Farnumber%3D4755480&authDecision=-203.

0.038370095 = product of:
  0.07674019 = sum of:
    0.07674019 = product of:
      0.23022056 = sum of:
        0.23022056 = weight(_text_:3a in 2514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.23022056 = score(doc=2514,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.40963197 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04831699 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2514, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2514)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fdelab.csd.auth.gr%2F~dimitris%2Fcourses%2Fir_spring06%2Fpage_rank_computing%2Fp527-li.pdf. Vgl. auch: http://www2002.org/CDROM/refereed/643/.