Search (33 results, page 1 of 2)

0.022394788 = product of:
  0.111973934 = sum of:
    0.111973934 = weight(_text_:22 in 1448) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.111973934 = score(doc=1448,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18088265 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051653754 = queryNorm
        0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 1448, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1448)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Date

22. 5.2005 19:53:09

0.019595439 = product of:
  0.09797719 = sum of:
    0.09797719 = weight(_text_:22 in 3339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09797719 = score(doc=3339,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18088265 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051653754 = queryNorm
        0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3339, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3339)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Date

22. 5.2005 19:52:29

0.019595439 = product of:
  0.09797719 = sum of:
    0.09797719 = weight(_text_:22 in 3924) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09797719 = score(doc=3924,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18088265 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051653754 = queryNorm
        0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3924, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3924)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Source

Library and information science research. 22(2000) no.4, S.371-382

0.01682717 = product of:
  0.084135845 = sum of:
    0.084135845 = weight(_text_:cd in 5235) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.084135845 = score(doc=5235,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.21311972 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.125929 = idf(docFreq=1940, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051653754 = queryNorm
        0.39478207 = fieldWeight in 5235, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          4.125929 = idf(docFreq=1940, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5235)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Abstract

Cooper identifies search strategies in 21 seven year old children (entering Piaget's concrete operational stage), and compares these to those characterized by a model of adult search strategies with a particular interest on the impact of visual information. Videotapes were made of behavior at a bookshelf of the children in their regularly scheduled media center class and in visits outside the class time. Children largely ignored the camera and commented on the videotapes in a debriefing session. Field notes were also kept. The analysis produced counts of strategy types using the Belkin model. Thirty-three books on spiders were added to the collection and filed normally in Dewey 595.4. A CD-ROM encyclopedia was also made available and both were utilized. Nine search sessions on the CD-ROM encyclopedia were recorded and a Scan/Learn/Recognize strategy was favored. At the shelf a Scan/Select/Recognize strategy was common with only a few looking beyond the cover to make a selection. Metadata use was discussed and the children agreed it should be used. It was used in the CD-ROM search but not at the shelves. There is a tendency to rely on visual information if available, and it appears the Belkin model can be used to characterize children's search behavior.

0.01648719 = product of:
  0.08243595 = sum of:
    0.08243595 = weight(_text_:cd in 2421) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08243595 = score(doc=2421,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.21311972 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.125929 = idf(docFreq=1940, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051653754 = queryNorm
        0.38680583 = fieldWeight in 2421, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.125929 = idf(docFreq=1940, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2421)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Abstract

School library media specialists do not know which search strategies are most appropriate for the new full-text CD-ROM databases. Reports an experiment conducted to examine the effectiveness of 2 search strategies - analytical and browse strategies - for information seeking and use among high school students using an electronic full-text ancyclopedia for the search task. The experiment sought to determine whether: a short training session in a particular information strategy allows an information seeker to form an adequate mental model of the search task; and a simple 'browse' model compare favourably with a more 'analytical' model for information seeking in a full-text online environment. Both strategies proved effective for finding relevant information yet each demonstrated distinct advantages and disadvantages. Recommends that as new technologies are introduced, school library media specialists should conduct careful observations and controlled comparisons of how students use these systems

0.013996742 = product of:
  0.069983706 = sum of:
    0.069983706 = weight(_text_:22 in 5835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.069983706 = score(doc=5835,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18088265 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051653754 = queryNorm
        0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5835, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5835)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Date

5. 8.2006 13:22:44

0.013739325 = product of:
  0.068696626 = sum of:
    0.068696626 = weight(_text_:cd in 2420) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.068696626 = score(doc=2420,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.21311972 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.125929 = idf(docFreq=1940, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051653754 = queryNorm
        0.3223382 = fieldWeight in 2420, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.125929 = idf(docFreq=1940, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2420)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Abstract

The primary aim of the study was to investigate the effect of the absence of postings information on online searches and searching behaviour and these results were reported in Journal of information science 20(1994) no.1. The secondary aim, reported here, was to assess the cognitive styles of the participants to ensure that the population was sufficiently vareid in this respect and to investigate possible correlations between cognitive ability and searching behaviour. Throughout the project, searches were made by postgraduates at the department of information studies, University of Sheffield using the LISA database on CD-ROM. A total of 67 searchers carried out 275 searches, both with and without postings information. Reports significant differences in both searching behaviour and search outcomes obtained by those with different learning styles, with and without postings information. Significant correlations were found between cognitice styles and online searching. Searchers characterized by different learning styles tend to adopt different search strategies and strategies associated with comprehension and operation learning styles result in qualitatively different searching performance. Searching approaches associated with a versatile style are the most effective. Making feedback in the form of postings available enables comprehension and operation learners, and field independent searchers, to change their apporach in qualitatively different ways. Other findings are reported and discussed

Source

Online and CD-ROM review. 18(1994) no.2, S.79-86

0.011658204 = product of:
  0.058291018 = sum of:
    0.058291018 = weight(_text_:cd in 2589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.058291018 = score(doc=2589,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21311972 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.125929 = idf(docFreq=1940, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051653754 = queryNorm
        0.27351302 = fieldWeight in 2589, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.125929 = idf(docFreq=1940, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2589)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Abstract

An exploratory study was conducted of elementary school children searching a full-text electronic encyclopedia on CD-ROM. 28 third and forth graders and 24 sixth graders conducted 2 assigned searches, one open-ended, the other one closed, after 2 demonstration sessions. Keystrokes captured by the computer and observer notes were used to examine user information-seeking strategies from a mental model perspective. Older searchers were more successful in finding required information, and took less time than younger searchers. No differences in total number of moves were found. Analysis of search patterns showed that novices used a heuristic, highly interactive search strategy. Searchers used sentence and phrase queries, indicating unique mental models for this search system. Most searchers accepted system defaults and used the AND connective in formulating queries. Transition matrix analysis showed that younger searchers generally favoured query refining moves and older searchers fovoured examining title and text moves. Suggestions for system designers were made and future research questions were identified

0.011658204 = product of:
  0.058291018 = sum of:
    0.058291018 = weight(_text_:cd in 5651) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.058291018 = score(doc=5651,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21311972 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.125929 = idf(docFreq=1940, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051653754 = queryNorm
        0.27351302 = fieldWeight in 5651, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.125929 = idf(docFreq=1940, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5651)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Abstract

Reports on a study conducted at Indiana University in the summer of 1993 which observed 10 advanced graduate students in language and literature studies as they conducted literature searches using databases on CD-ROM. Presents a brief review of related literature on relevance judgements, human-computer interaction (HCI) and information seeking behaviour of humanities students. The search strategies of the graduate students under study were found to be typical of humanities scholars, who create large sets and review records quickly to select relevant items. Factors influencing relevance assessments included language, source of publication, author, and length of work. Participants especially appreciated electronic access to the Modern Language Association (MLA) International Bibliography but encountered problems with the controlled vocabulary and analytic entries for books and proceedings. The study has identified problems with database content, presentation and search interfaces which should be considered by system designers

0.009715169 = product of:
  0.048575845 = sum of:
    0.048575845 = weight(_text_:cd in 4954) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.048575845 = score(doc=4954,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21311972 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.125929 = idf(docFreq=1940, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051653754 = queryNorm
        0.2279275 = fieldWeight in 4954, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.125929 = idf(docFreq=1940, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4954)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Source

Online and CD-ROM review. 20(1996) no.2, S.59-66

0.009715169 = product of:
  0.048575845 = sum of:
    0.048575845 = weight(_text_:cd in 1300) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.048575845 = score(doc=1300,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21311972 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.125929 = idf(docFreq=1940, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051653754 = queryNorm
        0.2279275 = fieldWeight in 1300, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.125929 = idf(docFreq=1940, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1300)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Abstract

This paper describes a new OPAC system called The Book House and discusses its relevance as a solution to current OPAC developments. The Book House is an interactive, multimedia, online public access catalogue system designed to support casual and/or novice end-users in information retrieval. It runs on a Macintosh and is available on CD-ROM and disks in English and Danish (it can be purchased from Risø for $100). It comprises an interface and module for classifying and indexing fact and fiction books in the database called Book House Write. It uses icons, text and animation in the display interface in order to enhance the utility of the system for the general public. Both words and pictures can be used for searching, which makes the system suitable for all age groups. It plays on users' previous experiencees with computer games to support learning by doing something in an enjoyable way. A prerequisite for the design of The Book House was a new approach to cognitive analysis of retrieval in libraries. Based on the success of this approach, it is claimed that OPAC systems will only be really useful and widespread (1) when their domain and task characteristics allow supplementary information to be added to existing descriptions of book content in online card catalogues in order to match end-users' intentions and needs, and (2) when the user interface and routes to the databases are configured as an integrated and uniform set of displays which match the search strategies of users, as well as their mental capabilities and limitations

0.008398045 = product of:
  0.041990224 = sum of:
    0.041990224 = weight(_text_:22 in 2404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.041990224 = score(doc=2404,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18088265 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051653754 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2404, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2404)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Date

25.12.1998 19:22:31

0.008398045 = product of:
  0.041990224 = sum of:
    0.041990224 = weight(_text_:22 in 281) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.041990224 = score(doc=281,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18088265 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051653754 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 281, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=281)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Date

22. 3.2002 9:53:10

0.008398045 = product of:
  0.041990224 = sum of:
    0.041990224 = weight(_text_:22 in 3450) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.041990224 = score(doc=3450,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18088265 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051653754 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3450, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3450)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Date

10. 4.2005 14:52:22

0.008398045 = product of:
  0.041990224 = sum of:
    0.041990224 = weight(_text_:22 in 3612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.041990224 = score(doc=3612,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18088265 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051653754 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3612, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3612)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Date

2. 7.2005 12:22:50

0.008398045 = product of:
  0.041990224 = sum of:
    0.041990224 = weight(_text_:22 in 5047) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.041990224 = score(doc=5047,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18088265 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051653754 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5047, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5047)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Date

5. 6.2006 11:22:23

0.008398045 = product of:
  0.041990224 = sum of:
    0.041990224 = weight(_text_:22 in 331) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.041990224 = score(doc=331,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18088265 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051653754 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 331, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=331)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Date

27. 5.2007 13:55:22

0.008398045 = product of:
  0.041990224 = sum of:
    0.041990224 = weight(_text_:22 in 813) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.041990224 = score(doc=813,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18088265 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051653754 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 813, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=813)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Date

23.12.2007 12:22:16

0.008398045 = product of:
  0.041990224 = sum of:
    0.041990224 = weight(_text_:22 in 3589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.041990224 = score(doc=3589,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18088265 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051653754 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3589, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3589)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Abstract

Information searching in practice seldom is an end in itself. In work, work task (WT) performance forms the context, which information searching should serve. Therefore, information retrieval (IR) systems development/evaluation should take the WT context into account. The present paper analyzes how WT features: task complexity and task types, affect information searching in authentic work: the types of information needs, search processes, and search media. We collected data on 22 information professionals in authentic work situations in three organization types: city administration, universities, and companies. The data comprise 286 WTs and 420 search tasks (STs). The data include transaction logs, video recordings, daily questionnaires, interviews. and observation. The data were analyzed quantitatively. Even if the participants used a range of search media, most STs were simple throughout the data, and up to 42% of WTs did not include searching. WT's effects on STs are not straightforward: different WT types react differently to WT complexity. Due to the simplicity of authentic searching, the WT/ST types in interactive IR experiments should be reconsidered.

0.006998371 = product of:
  0.034991853 = sum of:
    0.034991853 = weight(_text_:22 in 297) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.034991853 = score(doc=297,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18088265 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051653754 = queryNorm
        0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 297, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=297)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Date

22. 3.2002 9:55:52