-
Benoit, G.; Hussey, L.: Repurposing digital objects : case studies across the publishing industry (2011)
0.21
0.21297637 = product of:
0.3549606 = sum of:
0.18976131 = weight(_text_:objects in 4198) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.18976131 = score(doc=4198,freq=4.0), product of:
0.32642284 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.061414577 = queryNorm
0.5813359 = fieldWeight in 4198, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4198)
0.10695351 = weight(_text_:studies in 4198) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10695351 = score(doc=4198,freq=4.0), product of:
0.24506101 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
0.061414577 = queryNorm
0.43643627 = fieldWeight in 4198, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4198)
0.05824579 = weight(_text_:22 in 4198) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05824579 = score(doc=4198,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21506338 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.061414577 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4198, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4198)
0.6 = coord(3/5)
- Abstract
- Large, data-rich organizations have tremendously large collections of digital objects to be "repurposed," to respond quickly and economically to publishing, marketing, and information needs. Some management typically assume that a content management system, or some other technique such as OWL and RDF, will automatically address the workflow and technical issues associated with this reuse. Four case studies show that the sources of some roadblocks to agile repurposing are as much managerial and organizational as they are technical in nature. The review concludes with suggestions on how digital object repurposing can be integrated given these organizations' structures.
- Date
- 22. 1.2011 14:23:07
-
Srinivasan, R.; Boast, R.; Becvar, K.M.; Furner, J.: Blobgects : digital museum catalogs and diverse user communities (2009)
0.19
0.18596244 = product of:
0.3099374 = sum of:
0.21431358 = weight(_text_:objects in 2754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.21431358 = score(doc=2754,freq=10.0), product of:
0.32642284 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.061414577 = queryNorm
0.656552 = fieldWeight in 2754, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2754)
0.054019682 = weight(_text_:studies in 2754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054019682 = score(doc=2754,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24506101 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
0.061414577 = queryNorm
0.22043361 = fieldWeight in 2754, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2754)
0.041604135 = weight(_text_:22 in 2754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041604135 = score(doc=2754,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21506338 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.061414577 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2754, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2754)
0.6 = coord(3/5)
- Abstract
- This article presents an exploratory study of Blobgects, an experimental interface for an online museum catalog that enables social tagging and blogging activity around a set of cultural heritage objects held by a preeminent museum of anthropology and archaeology. This study attempts to understand not just whether social tagging and commenting about these objects is useful but rather whose tags and voices matter in presenting different expert perspectives around digital museum objects. Based on an empirical comparison between two different user groups (Canadian Inuit high-school students and museum studies students in the United States), we found that merely adding the ability to tag and comment to the museum's catalog does not sufficiently allow users to learn about or engage with the objects represented by catalog entries. Rather, the specialist language of the catalog provides too little contextualization for users to enter into the sort of dialog that proponents of Web 2.0 technologies promise. Overall, we propose a more nuanced application of Web 2.0 technologies within museums - one which provides a contextual basis that gives users a starting point for engagement and permits users to make sense of objects in relation to their own needs, uses, and understandings.
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 18:52:32
-
Forsyth, D.A.: Finding pictures of objects in large collections of images (1997)
0.18
0.17884845 = product of:
0.29808074 = sum of:
0.16265255 = weight(_text_:objects in 763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16265255 = score(doc=763,freq=4.0), product of:
0.32642284 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.061414577 = queryNorm
0.49828792 = fieldWeight in 763, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=763)
0.06482361 = weight(_text_:studies in 763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06482361 = score(doc=763,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24506101 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
0.061414577 = queryNorm
0.26452032 = fieldWeight in 763, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=763)
0.07060456 = weight(_text_:22 in 763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07060456 = score(doc=763,freq=4.0), product of:
0.21506338 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.061414577 = queryNorm
0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 763, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=763)
0.6 = coord(3/5)
- Abstract
- Describes an approach to the problem of object recognition structured around a sequence of increasingly specialised grouping activities that assemble coherent regions of images that can be sown to satisfy increasingly stringent conditions. The recognition system is designed to cope with: colour and texture; the ability to deal with general objects in uncontrolled configurations and contexts; and a satisfactory notion of classification. These properties are illustrated using 3 case studies, demonstrating: the use of descriptions that fuse colour and spatial properties; the use of fusion of texture and geometric properties to describes trees; and the use of a recognition system to determine accurately whether an image contains people and animals
- Date
- 22. 9.1997 19:16:05
3. 1.1999 12:21:22
-
Bates, M.J.: Fundamental forms of information (2006)
0.18
0.17530863 = product of:
0.29218104 = sum of:
0.1341815 = weight(_text_:objects in 2746) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1341815 = score(doc=2746,freq=2.0), product of:
0.32642284 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.061414577 = queryNorm
0.41106653 = fieldWeight in 2746, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2746)
0.07562755 = weight(_text_:studies in 2746) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07562755 = score(doc=2746,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24506101 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
0.061414577 = queryNorm
0.30860704 = fieldWeight in 2746, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2746)
0.08237199 = weight(_text_:22 in 2746) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08237199 = score(doc=2746,freq=4.0), product of:
0.21506338 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.061414577 = queryNorm
0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 2746, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2746)
0.6 = coord(3/5)
- Abstract
- Fundamental forms of information, as well as the term information itself, are defined and developed for the purposes of information science/studies. Concepts of natural and represented information (taking an unconventional sense of representation), encoded and embodied information, as well as experienced, enacted, expressed, embedded, recorded, and trace information are elaborated. The utility of these terms for the discipline is illustrated with examples from the study of information-seeking behavior and of information genres. Distinctions between the information and curatorial sciences with respect to their social (and informational) objects of study are briefly outlined.
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 18:15:22
-
Winget, M.A.: Annotations on musical scores by performing musicians : collaborative models, interactive methods, and music digital library tool development (2008)
0.15
0.15396728 = product of:
0.25661212 = sum of:
0.11501272 = weight(_text_:objects in 2368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11501272 = score(doc=2368,freq=2.0), product of:
0.32642284 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.061414577 = queryNorm
0.35234275 = fieldWeight in 2368, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2368)
0.09167444 = weight(_text_:studies in 2368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09167444 = score(doc=2368,freq=4.0), product of:
0.24506101 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
0.061414577 = queryNorm
0.37408823 = fieldWeight in 2368, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2368)
0.049924962 = weight(_text_:22 in 2368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049924962 = score(doc=2368,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21506338 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.061414577 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2368, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2368)
0.6 = coord(3/5)
- Abstract
- Although there have been a number of fairly recent studies in which researchers have explored the information-seeking and management behaviors of people interacting with musical retrieval systems, there have been very few published studies of the interaction and use behaviors of musicians interacting with their primary information object, the musical score. The ethnographic research reported here seeks to correct this deficiency in the literature. In addition to observing rehearsals and conducting 22 in-depth musician interviews, this research provides in-depth analysis of 25,000 annotations representing 250 parts from 13 complete musical works, made by musicians of all skill levels and performance modes. In addition to producing specific and practical recommendations for digital-library development, this research also provides an augmented annotation framework that will enable more specific study of human-information interaction, both with musical scores, and with more general notational/instructional information objects.
-
Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004)
0.14
0.13702114 = product of:
0.34255284 = sum of:
0.29262787 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.29262787 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.52067345 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.061414577 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.049924962 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049924962 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21506338 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.061414577 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Content
- Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
- Date
- 8. 1.2013 10:22:32
-
Malsburg, C. von der: ¬The correlation theory of brain function (1981)
0.14
0.13588022 = product of:
0.33970052 = sum of:
0.09584394 = weight(_text_:objects in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09584394 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
0.32642284 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.061414577 = queryNorm
0.29361898 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
0.24385656 = weight(_text_:3a in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.24385656 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
0.52067345 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.061414577 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- A summary of brain theory is given so far as it is contained within the framework of Localization Theory. Difficulties of this "conventional theory" are traced back to a specific deficiency: there is no way to express relations between active cells (as for instance their representing parts of the same object). A new theory is proposed to cure this deficiency. It introduces a new kind of dynamical control, termed synaptic modulation, according to which synapses switch between a conducting and a non- conducting state. The dynamics of this variable is controlled on a fast time scale by correlations in the temporal fine structure of cellular signals. Furthermore, conventional synaptic plasticity is replaced by a refined version. Synaptic modulation and plasticity form the basis for short-term and long-term memory, respectively. Signal correlations, shaped by the variable network, express structure and relationships within objects. In particular, the figure-ground problem may be solved in this way. Synaptic modulation introduces exibility into cerebral networks which is necessary to solve the invariance problem. Since momentarily useless connections are deactivated, interference between di erent memory traces can be reduced, and memory capacity increased, in comparison with conventional associative memory
- Source
- http%3A%2F%2Fcogprints.org%2F1380%2F1%2FvdM_correlation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0g7DvZbQPb2U7dYb49b9v_
-
Dick, S.J.: Astronomy's Three Kingdom System : a comprehensive classification system of celestial objects (2019)
0.13
0.13064352 = product of:
0.32660878 = sum of:
0.268363 = weight(_text_:objects in 5455) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.268363 = score(doc=5455,freq=8.0), product of:
0.32642284 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.061414577 = queryNorm
0.82213306 = fieldWeight in 5455, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5455)
0.05824579 = weight(_text_:22 in 5455) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05824579 = score(doc=5455,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21506338 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.061414577 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5455, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5455)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Although classification has been an important aspect of astronomy since stellar spectroscopy in the late nineteenth century, to date no comprehensive classification system has existed for all classes of objects in the universe. Here we present such a system, and lay out its foundational definitions and principles. The system consists of the "Three Kingdoms" of planets, stars and galaxies, eighteen families, and eighty-two classes of objects. Gravitation is the defining organizing principle for the families and classes, and the physical nature of the objects is the defining characteristic of the classes. The system should prove useful for both scientific and pedagogical purposes.
- Date
- 21.11.2019 18:46:22
-
Gabler, S.: Vergabe von DDC-Sachgruppen mittels eines Schlagwort-Thesaurus (2021)
0.13
0.12810078 = product of:
0.32025194 = sum of:
0.24385656 = weight(_text_:3a in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.24385656 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
0.52067345 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.061414577 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
0.07639536 = weight(_text_:studies in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07639536 = score(doc=1000,freq=4.0), product of:
0.24506101 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
0.061414577 = queryNorm
0.3117402 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Content
- Master thesis Master of Science (Library and Information Studies) (MSc), Universität Wien. Advisor: Christoph Steiner. Vgl.: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/371680244_Vergabe_von_DDC-Sachgruppen_mittels_eines_Schlagwort-Thesaurus. DOI: 10.25365/thesis.70030. Vgl. dazu die Präsentation unter: https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=0CAIQw7AJahcKEwjwoZzzytz_AhUAAAAAHQAAAAAQAg&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwiki.dnb.de%2Fdownload%2Fattachments%2F252121510%2FDA3%2520Workshop-Gabler.pdf%3Fversion%3D1%26modificationDate%3D1671093170000%26api%3Dv2&psig=AOvVaw0szwENK1or3HevgvIDOfjx&ust=1687719410889597&opi=89978449.
- Imprint
- Wien / Library and Information Studies : Universität
-
Hajibayova, L.; Jacob, E.K.: Investigation of levels of abstraction in user-generated tagging vocabularies : a case of wild or tamed categorization? (2014)
0.13
0.12522046 = product of:
0.20870076 = sum of:
0.09584394 = weight(_text_:objects in 1451) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09584394 = score(doc=1451,freq=2.0), product of:
0.32642284 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.061414577 = queryNorm
0.29361898 = fieldWeight in 1451, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1451)
0.054019682 = weight(_text_:studies in 1451) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054019682 = score(doc=1451,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24506101 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
0.061414577 = queryNorm
0.22043361 = fieldWeight in 1451, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1451)
0.05883713 = weight(_text_:22 in 1451) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05883713 = score(doc=1451,freq=4.0), product of:
0.21506338 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.061414577 = queryNorm
0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 1451, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1451)
0.6 = coord(3/5)
- Abstract
- Previous studies of user-generated vocabularies (e.g., Golder & Huberman, 2006; Munk & Mork, 2007b; Yoon, 2009) have proposed that a primary source of tag agreement across users is due to wide-spread use of tags at the basic level of abstraction. However, an investigation of levels of abstraction in user-generated tagging vocabularies did not support this notion. This study analyzed approximately 8000 tags generated by 40 subjects. Analysis of 7617 tags assigned to 36 online resources representing four content categories (TOOL, FRUIT, CLOTHING, VEHICLE) and three resource genres (news article, blog, ecommerce) did not find statistically significant preferences in the assignment of tags at the superordinate, subordinate or basic levels of abstraction. Within the framework of Heidegger's (1953/1996) notion of handiness , observed variations in the preferred level of abstraction are both natural and phenomenological in that perception and understanding -- and thus the meaning of "things" -- arise out of the individual's contextualized experiences of engaging with objects. Operationalization of superordinate, subordinate and basic levels of abstraction using Heidegger's notion of handiness may be able to account for differences in the everyday experiences and activities of taggers, thereby leading to a better understanding of user-generated tagging vocabularies.
- Date
- 5. 9.2014 16:22:27
- Source
- Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
-
Carroll, J.M.; Mack, R.L.: Metaphor, computing systems and active learning (1985)
0.12
0.12239849 = product of:
0.3059962 = sum of:
0.17286298 = weight(_text_:studies in 6506) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17286298 = score(doc=6506,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24506101 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
0.061414577 = queryNorm
0.70538753 = fieldWeight in 6506, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6506)
0.13313323 = weight(_text_:22 in 6506) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13313323 = score(doc=6506,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21506338 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.061414577 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6506, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6506)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Source
- International journal of man-machine studies. 22(1985), S.39-57
-
Day, R.E.: Death of the user : reconceptualizing subjects, objects, and their relations (2011)
0.12
0.12132063 = product of:
0.30330157 = sum of:
0.21687007 = weight(_text_:objects in 4134) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.21687007 = score(doc=4134,freq=4.0), product of:
0.32642284 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.061414577 = queryNorm
0.6643839 = fieldWeight in 4134, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4134)
0.08643149 = weight(_text_:studies in 4134) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08643149 = score(doc=4134,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24506101 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
0.061414577 = queryNorm
0.35269377 = fieldWeight in 4134, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4134)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- The article explains why the concept of the user in Library and Information Science (LIS) user studies and information seeking behavior is theoretically inadequate and it proposes a reconceptualization of subjects, objects, and their relations according to a model of 'double mediation.' Formal causation (affordances) is suggested as a substitute for mechanistic causation. The notion of 'affective causation' is introduced. The works of several psychoanalysts and continental and Anglo-American philosophers are used as tools to develop the model.
-
Verwer, K.: Freiheit und Verantwortung bei Hans Jonas (2011)
0.12
0.11705115 = product of:
0.58525574 = sum of:
0.58525574 = weight(_text_:3a in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.58525574 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
0.52067345 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.061414577 = queryNorm
1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Content
- Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fcreativechoice.org%2Fdoc%2FHansJonas.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1TM3teaYKgABL5H9yoIifA&opi=89978449.
-
Fachsystematik Bremen nebst Schlüssel 1970 ff. (1970 ff)
0.11
0.11418428 = product of:
0.2854607 = sum of:
0.24385656 = weight(_text_:3a in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.24385656 = score(doc=3577,freq=2.0), product of:
0.52067345 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.061414577 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
0.041604135 = weight(_text_:22 in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041604135 = score(doc=3577,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21506338 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.061414577 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Content
- 1. Agrarwissenschaften 1981. - 3. Allgemeine Geographie 2.1972. - 3a. Allgemeine Naturwissenschaften 1.1973. - 4. Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft, Allgemeine Literaturwissenschaft 2.1971. - 6. Allgemeines. 5.1983. - 7. Anglistik 3.1976. - 8. Astronomie, Geodäsie 4.1977. - 12. bio Biologie, bcp Biochemie-Biophysik, bot Botanik, zoo Zoologie 1981. - 13. Bremensien 3.1983. - 13a. Buch- und Bibliothekswesen 3.1975. - 14. Chemie 4.1977. - 14a. Elektrotechnik 1974. - 15 Ethnologie 2.1976. - 16,1. Geowissenschaften. Sachteil 3.1977. - 16,2. Geowissenschaften. Regionaler Teil 3.1977. - 17. Germanistik 6.1984. - 17a,1. Geschichte. Teilsystematik hil. - 17a,2. Geschichte. Teilsystematik his Neuere Geschichte. - 17a,3. Geschichte. Teilsystematik hit Neueste Geschichte. - 18. Humanbiologie 2.1983. - 19. Ingenieurwissenschaften 1974. - 20. siehe 14a. - 21. klassische Philologie 3.1977. - 22. Klinische Medizin 1975. - 23. Kunstgeschichte 2.1971. - 24. Kybernetik. 2.1975. - 25. Mathematik 3.1974. - 26. Medizin 1976. - 26a. Militärwissenschaft 1985. - 27. Musikwissenschaft 1978. - 27a. Noten 2.1974. - 28. Ozeanographie 3.1977. -29. Pädagogik 8.1985. - 30. Philosphie 3.1974. - 31. Physik 3.1974. - 33. Politik, Politische Wissenschaft, Sozialwissenschaft. Soziologie. Länderschlüssel. Register 1981. - 34. Psychologie 2.1972. - 35. Publizistik und Kommunikationswissenschaft 1985. - 36. Rechtswissenschaften 1986. - 37. Regionale Geograpgie 3.1975. - 37a. Religionswissenschaft 1970. - 38. Romanistik 3.1976. - 39. Skandinavistik 4.1985. - 40. Slavistik 1977. - 40a. Sonstige Sprachen und Literaturen 1973. - 43. Sport 4.1983. - 44. Theaterwissenschaft 1985. - 45. Theologie 2.1976. - 45a. Ur- und Frühgeschichte, Archäologie 1970. - 47. Volkskunde 1976. - 47a. Wirtschaftswissenschaften 1971 // Schlüssel: 1. Länderschlüssel 1971. - 2. Formenschlüssel (Kurzform) 1974. - 3. Personenschlüssel Literatur 5. Fassung 1968
-
Proffitt, M.: Pulling it all together : use of METS in RLG cultural materials service (2004)
0.11
0.11337467 = product of:
0.2834367 = sum of:
0.21687007 = weight(_text_:objects in 767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.21687007 = score(doc=767,freq=4.0), product of:
0.32642284 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.061414577 = queryNorm
0.6643839 = fieldWeight in 767, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=767)
0.06656662 = weight(_text_:22 in 767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06656662 = score(doc=767,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21506338 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.061414577 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 767, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=767)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- RLG has used METS for a particular application, that is as a wrapper for structural metadata. When RLG cultural materials was launched, there was no single way to deal with "complex digital objects". METS provides a standard means of encoding metadata regarding the digital objects represented in RCM, and METS has now been fully integrated into the workflow for this service.
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.65-68
-
Johnson, E.H.: Using IODyne : Illustrations and examples (1998)
0.11
0.11337467 = product of:
0.2834367 = sum of:
0.21687007 = weight(_text_:objects in 2341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.21687007 = score(doc=2341,freq=4.0), product of:
0.32642284 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.061414577 = queryNorm
0.6643839 = fieldWeight in 2341, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2341)
0.06656662 = weight(_text_:22 in 2341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06656662 = score(doc=2341,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21506338 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.061414577 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2341, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2341)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- IODyone is an Internet client program that allows one to retriev information from servers by dynamically combining information objects. Information objects are abstract representations of bibliographic data, typically titles (or title keywords), author names, subject and classification identifiers, and full-text search terms
- Date
- 22. 9.1997 19:16:05
-
Holetschek, J. et al.: Natural history in Europeana : accessing scientific collection objects via LOD (2016)
0.11
0.10995846 = product of:
0.27489614 = sum of:
0.19168788 = weight(_text_:objects in 3277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.19168788 = score(doc=3277,freq=2.0), product of:
0.32642284 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.061414577 = queryNorm
0.58723795 = fieldWeight in 3277, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3277)
0.08320827 = weight(_text_:22 in 3277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08320827 = score(doc=3277,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21506338 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.061414577 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3277, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3277)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Source
- Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
-
Seeman, D.: Naming names : the ethics of identification in digital library metadata (2012)
0.11
0.1073333 = product of:
0.26833326 = sum of:
0.21431358 = weight(_text_:objects in 416) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.21431358 = score(doc=416,freq=10.0), product of:
0.32642284 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.061414577 = queryNorm
0.656552 = fieldWeight in 416, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=416)
0.054019682 = weight(_text_:studies in 416) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054019682 = score(doc=416,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24506101 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
0.061414577 = queryNorm
0.22043361 = fieldWeight in 416, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=416)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- In many digital libraries, visual objects are published and metadata attached to allow for search and retrieval. For visual objects in which people appear, names are often added to the metadata so that digital library users can search for people appearing in these objects. Although this seems straightforward, there are ethical implications of adding names to metadata for visual objects. This paper explores the impact of this action and discusses relevant ethical issues it raises. It asserts that an individual's right to privacy and control over personal information must be weighed against the benefit of the object to society and the professional ethic to authentically represent a resource through its metadata. Context and an understanding of the major ethical issues will inform the practical decision of whether to keep objects online and add metadata to them, but items should generally be published unless there are clear ethical violations or a community relationship is in jeopardy.
- Content
- Beitrag aus einem Themenheft zu den Proceedings of the 2nd Milwaukee Conference on Ethics in Information Organization, June 15-16, 2012, School of Information Studies, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee. Hope A. Olson, Conference Chair. Vgl.: http://www.ergon-verlag.de/isko_ko/downloads/ko_39_2012_5_c.pdf.
-
Olason, S.C.: Let's get usable! : Usability studies for indexes (2000)
0.11
0.106800966 = product of:
0.2670024 = sum of:
0.17286298 = weight(_text_:studies in 882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17286298 = score(doc=882,freq=8.0), product of:
0.24506101 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
0.061414577 = queryNorm
0.70538753 = fieldWeight in 882, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=882)
0.09413941 = weight(_text_:22 in 882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09413941 = score(doc=882,freq=4.0), product of:
0.21506338 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.061414577 = queryNorm
0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 882, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=882)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- The article discusses a series of usability studies on indexes from a systems engineering and human factors perspective. The purpose of these studies is to establish a set of user requirements that indexes need to satisfy. The results from the first set of studies are presented and suggestions made as to how these can be applied to improve the usability and quality of indexes.
- Footnote
- Vgl.: http://www.theindexer.org/files/22-2-olason.pdf.
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.2, S.91-95
-
Fidel, R.: ¬The image retrieval task : implications for the design and evaluation of image databases (1997)
0.11
0.10561261 = product of:
0.26403153 = sum of:
0.1992079 = weight(_text_:objects in 2885) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1992079 = score(doc=2885,freq=6.0), product of:
0.32642284 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.061414577 = queryNorm
0.6102756 = fieldWeight in 2885, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2885)
0.06482361 = weight(_text_:studies in 2885) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06482361 = score(doc=2885,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24506101 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
0.061414577 = queryNorm
0.26452032 = fieldWeight in 2885, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2885)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- A review of studies about searching beganiour in image retrieval suggests that retrieval tasks may affect searching behaviour. Retrieval tasks occur along a spectrum starting with the Data Pole, which involves retrieval of images for the information which the image include, and ending with the Objects Pole, which concerns the retrieval of images as objects. Each Pole generates a certain searching behaviour which has characteristics opposing those of the other pole. These characteristics suggest that: relevance feedback may not be useful for tasks on the Object Pole; measuring precision on the Data Pole should be replaced with another measurement of effort and time, while on the Objects Pole, the quality of browsing sets and the precision of the browsing process should be measured instead of precision; and recall is not useful for the Data Pole, and requires much exploration before it can be adopted for the Object Pole. Additional research in searching behaviour and about performance measurement will improve retrieval from image databases
