Search (147 results, page 1 of 8)

  • × theme_ss:"Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus"
  1. Thesaurus rules and conventions (1967) 0.04
    0.04129444 = product of:
      0.22023702 = sum of:
        0.062951215 = product of:
          0.12590243 = sum of:
            0.12590243 = weight(_text_:rules in 7141) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12590243 = score(doc=7141,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16161752 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032090448 = queryNorm
                0.77901477 = fieldWeight in 7141, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7141)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.12590243 = weight(_text_:rules in 7141) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12590243 = score(doc=7141,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16161752 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.77901477 = fieldWeight in 7141, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7141)
        0.031383373 = product of:
          0.062766746 = sum of:
            0.062766746 = weight(_text_:ed in 7141) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.062766746 = score(doc=7141,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11411327 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032090448 = queryNorm
                0.55003893 = fieldWeight in 7141, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7141)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.1875 = coord(3/16)
    
    Source
    Guide for source indexing and abstracting engineering literature. Ed.: F.Y. Speight
  2. Kent, R.E.: Implications and rules in thesauri (1994) 0.03
    0.031978153 = product of:
      0.17055015 = sum of:
        0.050872266 = product of:
          0.10174453 = sum of:
            0.10174453 = weight(_text_:rules in 3457) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10174453 = score(doc=3457,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16161752 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032090448 = queryNorm
                0.629539 = fieldWeight in 3457, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3457)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.10174453 = weight(_text_:rules in 3457) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10174453 = score(doc=3457,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16161752 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.629539 = fieldWeight in 3457, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3457)
        0.017933354 = product of:
          0.035866708 = sum of:
            0.035866708 = weight(_text_:ed in 3457) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035866708 = score(doc=3457,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11411327 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032090448 = queryNorm
                0.31430796 = fieldWeight in 3457, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3457)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.1875 = coord(3/16)
    
    Abstract
    A central consideration in the study of whole language semantic space as encoded in thesauri is word sense comparability. Shows how word sense comparability can be adequately expressed by the logical implications and rules from Formal Concept Analysis. Formal concept analysis, a new approach to formal logic initiated by Rudolf Wille, has been used for data modelling, analysis and interpretation, and also for knowledge representation and knowledge discovery
    Source
    Knowledge organization and quality management: Proc. of the 3rd International ISKO Conference, 20-24 June 1994, Copenhagen, Denmark. Ed.: H. Albrechtsen et al
  3. Austin, D.; Dale, P.: Guidelines for the establishment and development of monolingual thesauri (1981) 0.03
    0.026819376 = product of:
      0.21455501 = sum of:
        0.1786883 = weight(_text_:2nd in 20) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1786883 = score(doc=20,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18010403 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6123877 = idf(docFreq=438, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.99213934 = fieldWeight in 20, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.6123877 = idf(docFreq=438, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=20)
        0.035866708 = product of:
          0.071733415 = sum of:
            0.071733415 = weight(_text_:ed in 20) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.071733415 = score(doc=20,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11411327 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032090448 = queryNorm
                0.6286159 = fieldWeight in 20, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=20)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.125 = coord(2/16)
    
    Issue
    2nd ed.
  4. ISO 2788 Guidelines for the establishment and development of monolingual thesauri (1986) 0.03
    0.026819376 = product of:
      0.21455501 = sum of:
        0.1786883 = weight(_text_:2nd in 2493) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1786883 = score(doc=2493,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18010403 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6123877 = idf(docFreq=438, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.99213934 = fieldWeight in 2493, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.6123877 = idf(docFreq=438, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2493)
        0.035866708 = product of:
          0.071733415 = sum of:
            0.071733415 = weight(_text_:ed in 2493) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.071733415 = score(doc=2493,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11411327 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032090448 = queryNorm
                0.6286159 = fieldWeight in 2493, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2493)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.125 = coord(2/16)
    
    Issue
    2nd ed.
  5. Rudell-Betts, L.: New rules for thesauri (1995) 0.02
    0.023606706 = product of:
      0.18885365 = sum of:
        0.062951215 = product of:
          0.12590243 = sum of:
            0.12590243 = weight(_text_:rules in 6076) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12590243 = score(doc=6076,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16161752 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032090448 = queryNorm
                0.77901477 = fieldWeight in 6076, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6076)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.12590243 = weight(_text_:rules in 6076) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12590243 = score(doc=6076,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16161752 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.77901477 = fieldWeight in 6076, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6076)
      0.125 = coord(2/16)
    
  6. Roulin, C.: Sub-thesauri as part of a metathesaurus (1992) 0.02
    0.023596823 = product of:
      0.12584972 = sum of:
        0.035972122 = product of:
          0.071944244 = sum of:
            0.071944244 = weight(_text_:rules in 2112) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.071944244 = score(doc=2112,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16161752 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032090448 = queryNorm
                0.4451513 = fieldWeight in 2112, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2112)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.071944244 = weight(_text_:rules in 2112) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.071944244 = score(doc=2112,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16161752 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.4451513 = fieldWeight in 2112, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2112)
        0.017933354 = product of:
          0.035866708 = sum of:
            0.035866708 = weight(_text_:ed in 2112) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035866708 = score(doc=2112,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11411327 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032090448 = queryNorm
                0.31430796 = fieldWeight in 2112, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2112)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.1875 = coord(3/16)
    
    Abstract
    A metathesaurus is a set made of a reference thesaurus and various forms of indexing languages attached to it. Among these, the sub-thesauri cover restricted fields in more detail. A functional definition of the sub-thesaurus is proposed: elements, relationships, sub-systems and rules to be respected to preserve the possibilities for communication via the reference thesaurus. Considerations on the methods of presentation, the use and the compilation are also given
    Source
    Classification research for knowledge representation and organization. Proc. 5th Int. Study Conf. on Classification Research, Toronto, Canada, 24.-28.6.1991. Ed. by N.J. Williamson u. M. Hudon
  7. Jones, S.; Gatford, M.; Robertson, S.; Hancock-Beaulieu, M.; Secker, J.; Walker, S.: Interactive thesaurus navigation : intelligence rules OK? (1995) 0.02
    0.023114135 = product of:
      0.12327539 = sum of:
        0.031475607 = product of:
          0.062951215 = sum of:
            0.062951215 = weight(_text_:rules in 180) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.062951215 = score(doc=180,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16161752 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032090448 = queryNorm
                0.38950738 = fieldWeight in 180, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=180)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.028848568 = weight(_text_:american in 180) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028848568 = score(doc=180,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10940785 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.26367915 = fieldWeight in 180, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=180)
        0.062951215 = weight(_text_:rules in 180) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.062951215 = score(doc=180,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16161752 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.38950738 = fieldWeight in 180, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=180)
      0.1875 = coord(3/16)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 46(1995) no.1, S.52-59
  8. Losee, R.: Thesaurus structure, descriptive parameters, and scale (2016) 0.02
    0.023074254 = product of:
      0.123062685 = sum of:
        0.055614963 = weight(_text_:descriptive in 3087) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.055614963 = score(doc=3087,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17974061 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.601063 = idf(docFreq=443, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.3094179 = fieldWeight in 3087, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.601063 = idf(docFreq=443, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3087)
        0.022482576 = product of:
          0.04496515 = sum of:
            0.04496515 = weight(_text_:rules in 3087) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04496515 = score(doc=3087,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16161752 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032090448 = queryNorm
                0.27821955 = fieldWeight in 3087, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3087)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.04496515 = weight(_text_:rules in 3087) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04496515 = score(doc=3087,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16161752 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.27821955 = fieldWeight in 3087, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3087)
      0.1875 = coord(3/16)
    
    Abstract
    A thesaurus contains a set of terms or features that may be used to represent recorded information, including prose documents or scientific data sets. The focus of this work is on the basic structural nature of a thesaurus itself, not on how people develop a thesaurus or how a thesaurus effects retrieval performance. Thesauri in this research are automatically developed in a simulation from sets of randomly or exhaustively generated documents. Each thesaurus is generated by the Thesaurus Generator software from a set of several hundred documents, and thousands of different document sets are used as input to the Thesaurus Generator, producing thousands of thesauri. Thus, thousands of thesauri are generated for each data point in accompanying graphs. The characteristics of this large number of thesauri are studied so that the relationships between thesaurus parameters can be determined. Some rules governing these relationships are suggested, addressing factors such as tree height and width, number of tree roots in thesauri, and number of terms available for the vocabulary. How these parameters scale as vocabularies grow is addressed. These results apply to various information systems that contain features with hierarchical relationships, including many thesauri and ontologies.
  9. Klaus, H.: implications for construction and display : Understandings of thesauri in the online dialogue (1999) 0.02
    0.021027623 = product of:
      0.16822098 = sum of:
        0.08411049 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 3449) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08411049 = score(doc=3449,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.5894953 = fieldWeight in 3449, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3449)
        0.08411049 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 3449) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08411049 = score(doc=3449,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.5894953 = fieldWeight in 3449, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3449)
      0.125 = coord(2/16)
    
    Source
    Cataloguing Australia. 25(1999) nos.1/4, S.120-139
  10. Stumm, D.: When is a forest fire a bushfire? : Towards an Australian Pictorial Thesaurus (1999) 0.02
    0.021027623 = product of:
      0.16822098 = sum of:
        0.08411049 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 500) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08411049 = score(doc=500,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.5894953 = fieldWeight in 500, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=500)
        0.08411049 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 500) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08411049 = score(doc=500,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.5894953 = fieldWeight in 500, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=500)
      0.125 = coord(2/16)
    
    Source
    Cataloguing Australia. 25(1999) nos.1/4, S.140-146
  11. Zainab, A.N.; Silva, S.M. de: Expert systems in library and information services : publication trends, authorship patterns and expressiveness of published titles (1998) 0.02
    0.020879813 = product of:
      0.111359 = sum of:
        0.04126692 = weight(_text_:author in 2927) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04126692 = score(doc=2927,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15482868 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.824759 = idf(docFreq=964, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.26653278 = fieldWeight in 2927, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.824759 = idf(docFreq=964, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2927)
        0.035046037 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 2927) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035046037 = score(doc=2927,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.24562302 = fieldWeight in 2927, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2927)
        0.035046037 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 2927) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035046037 = score(doc=2927,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.24562302 = fieldWeight in 2927, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2927)
      0.1875 = coord(3/16)
    
    Abstract
    Presents a state of the art review of the literature of expert systems in library and information science, involving exhaustive searches of all major LIS CD-ROM databases (LISA, ERIC, LiLi, INSPEC etc.) and bibliographies appended in review articles. The search retrieved 679 references, comprising 362 periodical articles, 180 conference proceedings, 63 books articles, 28 theses and 46 monographs. The growth of the literature peaked between 1989 and 1990 and subsequently declined after 1992. Over 1/3 (287) covered intelligent front ends and interfaces for online searching and retrieval, followed by applications in reference service (113), classification, indexing and abstracting (86) and cataloguing (7). The most productive periodicals comprised 6 titles, of which 'Information processing and management' topped the lsit: 43 authors were found to contribute between 5 and 35 articles each, hence contributing 32,19% of the total contributors. 382 of the publications were single author works, 172 were by 2 authors, 72 were by 3 authors and 49 were by 4 or more authors. Only 161 titles were expressive enough to reveal both the name and function of systems being developed
  12. Little, K.: Constructing a thesaurus of environmental protection terms (1993) 0.02
    0.019825032 = product of:
      0.15860026 = sum of:
        0.07930013 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 8200) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07930013 = score(doc=8200,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.5557815 = fieldWeight in 8200, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8200)
        0.07930013 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 8200) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07930013 = score(doc=8200,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.5557815 = fieldWeight in 8200, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8200)
      0.125 = coord(2/16)
    
    Footnote
    Paper presented at the 10th National Cataloguing Conference on Subject to change: subject access and the role of the cataloguer, Freemantle, Western Australia, 4-6 Nov 93
    Source
    Cataloguing Australia. 19(1993) nos. 3/4, S.222-232
  13. Aitchison, J.; Gilchrist, A.: Thesaurus construction : a practical manual (1987) 0.02
    0.017922772 = product of:
      0.14338218 = sum of:
        0.11168019 = weight(_text_:2nd in 6869) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11168019 = score(doc=6869,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18010403 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6123877 = idf(docFreq=438, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.6200871 = fieldWeight in 6869, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.6123877 = idf(docFreq=438, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6869)
        0.031701993 = product of:
          0.06340399 = sum of:
            0.06340399 = weight(_text_:ed in 6869) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06340399 = score(doc=6869,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.11411327 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032090448 = queryNorm
                0.55562323 = fieldWeight in 6869, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6869)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.125 = coord(2/16)
    
    Footnote
    3rd ed. u.d.T.: Thesaurus construction and use
    Issue
    2nd ed.
  14. Riesthuis, G.J.A.: Multilingual subject access and the Guidelines for the establishment and development of multilingual thesauri : an experimental study (2000) 0.02
    0.01769762 = product of:
      0.0943873 = sum of:
        0.026979093 = product of:
          0.053958185 = sum of:
            0.053958185 = weight(_text_:rules in 131) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.053958185 = score(doc=131,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16161752 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032090448 = queryNorm
                0.33386347 = fieldWeight in 131, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=131)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.053958185 = weight(_text_:rules in 131) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053958185 = score(doc=131,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16161752 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.33386347 = fieldWeight in 131, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=131)
        0.013450016 = product of:
          0.026900033 = sum of:
            0.026900033 = weight(_text_:ed in 131) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.026900033 = score(doc=131,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11411327 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032090448 = queryNorm
                0.23573098 = fieldWeight in 131, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=131)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.1875 = coord(3/16)
    
    Abstract
    In this paper, after an introduction about problems of multilingual information languages, the rules and recommendations of the Guidelines for the establishment and development of multilingual thesauri for non-equivalence and partial equivalence of terms in different languages are discussed. Artificial terms are not very useful in searching, because most users are not willing to use a thesaurus to find the right descriptor. On the other hand indexers need guidance on how to index and therefore need a thesaurus with all desirable and necessary relations. It is suggested that bibliographic online systems can take over some of the functions for the searcher from the thesaurus and that a few new relations could be helpful to an indexer
    Source
    Dynamism and stability in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the 6th International ISKO-Conference, 10-13 July 2000, Toronto, Canada. Ed.: C. Beghtol et al
  15. Cheti, A.; Viti, E.: Functionality and merits of a faceted thesaurus : the case of the Nuovo soggettario (2023) 0.02
    0.017621385 = product of:
      0.09398072 = sum of:
        0.026979093 = product of:
          0.053958185 = sum of:
            0.053958185 = weight(_text_:rules in 1181) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.053958185 = score(doc=1181,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16161752 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032090448 = queryNorm
                0.33386347 = fieldWeight in 1181, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1181)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.053958185 = weight(_text_:rules in 1181) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053958185 = score(doc=1181,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16161752 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.33386347 = fieldWeight in 1181, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1181)
        0.013043438 = product of:
          0.026086876 = sum of:
            0.026086876 = weight(_text_:22 in 1181) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.026086876 = score(doc=1181,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11237528 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032090448 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1181, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1181)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.1875 = coord(3/16)
    
    Abstract
    The Nuovo soggettario, the official Italian subject indexing system edited by the National Central Library of Florence, is made up of interactive components, the core of which is a general thesaurus and some rules of a conventional syntax for subject string construction. The Nuovo soggettario Thesaurus is in compliance with ISO 25964: 2011-2013, IFLA LRM, and FAIR principle (findability, accessibility, interoperability, and reusability). Its open data are available in the Zthes, MARC21, and in SKOS formats and allow for interoperability with l library, archive, and museum databases. The Thesaurus's macrostructure is organized into four fundamental macro-categories, thirteen categories, and facets. The facets allow for the orderly development of hierarchies, thereby limiting polyhierarchies and promoting the grouping of homogenous concepts. This paper addresses the main features and peculiarities which have characterized the consistent development of this categorical structure and its effects on the syntactic sphere in a predominantly pre-coordinated usage context.
    Date
    26.11.2023 18:59:22
  16. Walker, A.: Building an Australian thesaurus : indexing Australian historical photographs (1993) 0.02
    0.017346904 = product of:
      0.13877523 = sum of:
        0.069387615 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 8201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.069387615 = score(doc=8201,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.4863088 = fieldWeight in 8201, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=8201)
        0.069387615 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 8201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.069387615 = score(doc=8201,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.4863088 = fieldWeight in 8201, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=8201)
      0.125 = coord(2/16)
    
    Footnote
    Paper presented at the 10th National Cataloguing Conference on Subject to change: subject access and the role of the cataloguer, Freemantle, Western Australia, 4-6 Nov 93
    Source
    Cataloguing Australia. 19(1993) nos. 3/4, S.268-279
  17. Schmitz-Esser, W.: Thesaurus and beyond : an advanced formula for linguistic engineering and information retrieval (1999) 0.02
    0.016705295 = product of:
      0.08909491 = sum of:
        0.049520306 = weight(_text_:author in 4116) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049520306 = score(doc=4116,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15482868 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.824759 = idf(docFreq=964, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.31983936 = fieldWeight in 4116, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.824759 = idf(docFreq=964, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4116)
        0.026531162 = weight(_text_:26 in 4116) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026531162 = score(doc=4116,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.113328174 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.23410915 = fieldWeight in 4116, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4116)
        0.013043438 = product of:
          0.026086876 = sum of:
            0.026086876 = weight(_text_:22 in 4116) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.026086876 = score(doc=4116,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11237528 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032090448 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4116, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4116)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.1875 = coord(3/16)
    
    Abstract
    This paper describes a proposal for a new approach to thesaurus design and construction that could have significant implicantions for change in the way multilingual thesauri are handled and integrated with each other. The formula presented here has its origin in the work of the German Thesaurus Committee and has had input from a number of scientists and practitioners int he field. The emphasis is on the various types of relationships found among concepts, notiions and universals in languages. These relationships are analysed and refined beyond the approach taken in existing thesauri. This proposal is very much at the discussion stage and the author invites the assistance of interested readers through criticisms, discussion and dialogue. Applications of the proposed thesaurus are included and the major goal of this proposal is to provide the basis for improved desing and integration of multilingual thesauri
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 26(1999) no.1, S.10-22
  18. Chmielewska-Gorczyca, E.: Tezaurus prawa Biblioteki Sejmowej (1996) 0.01
    0.011803353 = product of:
      0.094426826 = sum of:
        0.031475607 = product of:
          0.062951215 = sum of:
            0.062951215 = weight(_text_:rules in 3222) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.062951215 = score(doc=3222,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16161752 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032090448 = queryNorm
                0.38950738 = fieldWeight in 3222, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3222)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.062951215 = weight(_text_:rules in 3222) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.062951215 = score(doc=3222,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16161752 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.38950738 = fieldWeight in 3222, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3222)
      0.125 = coord(2/16)
    
    Abstract
    Describes the thesaurus that has been created at the Library of the Polish Parliament and is one element of the STEBIS system (System Tezaurusow Biblioteki Sejmowej). Discusses and illustrates with examples the rules of selecting vocabulary terms. The main aim is to map the contents of Polish and foreign documents and to preserve compatibility with the EUROVOC Thesaurus of the European Parliament. Emphasizes the need for the systematization of terms within one logical setup, with regard to the alphabetical and systematic part of the thesaurus and the multilingual character of the EUROVOC Thesaurus
  19. Chen, H.; Ng, T.: ¬An algorithmic approach to concept exploration in a large knowledge network (automatic thesaurus consultation) : symbolic branch-and-bound search versus connectionist Hopfield Net Activation (1995) 0.01
    0.011466932 = product of:
      0.09173545 = sum of:
        0.024727343 = weight(_text_:american in 2203) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024727343 = score(doc=2203,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10940785 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.22601068 = fieldWeight in 2203, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2203)
        0.06700811 = weight(_text_:2nd in 2203) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06700811 = score(doc=2203,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18010403 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6123877 = idf(docFreq=438, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.37205225 = fieldWeight in 2203, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.6123877 = idf(docFreq=438, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2203)
      0.125 = coord(2/16)
    
    Abstract
    Presents a framework for knowledge discovery and concept exploration. In order to enhance the concept exploration capability of knowledge based systems and to alleviate the limitation of the manual browsing approach, develops 2 spreading activation based algorithms for concept exploration in large, heterogeneous networks of concepts (eg multiple thesauri). One algorithm, which is based on the symbolic AI paradigma, performs a conventional branch-and-bound search on a semantic net representation to identify other highly relevant concepts (a serial, optimal search process). The 2nd algorithm, which is absed on the neural network approach, executes the Hopfield net parallel relaxation and convergence process to identify 'convergent' concepts for some initial queries (a parallel, heuristic search process). Tests these 2 algorithms on a large text-based knowledge network of about 13.000 nodes (terms) and 80.000 directed links in the area of computing technologies
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 46(1995) no.5, S.348-369
  20. Srinivasan, P.: Thesaurus construction (1992) 0.01
    0.010057266 = product of:
      0.08045813 = sum of:
        0.06700811 = weight(_text_:2nd in 3504) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06700811 = score(doc=3504,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18010403 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6123877 = idf(docFreq=438, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.37205225 = fieldWeight in 3504, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.6123877 = idf(docFreq=438, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3504)
        0.013450016 = product of:
          0.026900033 = sum of:
            0.026900033 = weight(_text_:ed in 3504) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.026900033 = score(doc=3504,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11411327 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032090448 = queryNorm
                0.23573098 = fieldWeight in 3504, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3504)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.125 = coord(2/16)
    
    Abstract
    Thesauri are valuable structures for Information Retrieval systems. A thesaurus provides a precise and controlled vocabulary which serves to coordinate dacument indexing and document retrieval. In both indexing and retrieval, a thesaurus may be used to select the most appropriate terms. Additionally, the thesaurus can assist the searcher in reformulating search strategies if required. Examines the important features of thesauri. This should allow the reader to differentiate between thesauri. Next, a brief overview of the manual thesaurus construction process is given. 2 major approaches for automatic thesaurus construction have been selected for detailed examination. The first is on thesaurus construction from collections of documents,a nd the 2nd, on thesaurus construction by merging existing thesauri. These 2 methods were selected since they rely on statistical techniques alone and are also significantly different from each other. Programs written in C language accompany the discussion of these approaches
    Source
    Information retrieval: data structures and algorithms. Ed.: W.B. Frakes u. R. Baeza-Yates

Authors

Languages

Types

  • a 123
  • m 10
  • n 7
  • s 4
  • el 3
  • x 2
  • b 1
  • p 1
  • More… Less…