-
Duncan, D.: IFLA Core Programme for Universal Bibliographic Control and International MARC (UBCIM) and Division of Bibliographic Control reports on activities 1994-1995 : Section on Classification and Indexing (1996)
0.06
0.06026233 = product of:
0.21091814 = sum of:
0.048010457 = weight(_text_:subject in 4927) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048010457 = score(doc=4927,freq=4.0), product of:
0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.4470745 = fieldWeight in 4927, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4927)
0.046620894 = weight(_text_:classification in 4927) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046620894 = score(doc=4927,freq=6.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.48755667 = fieldWeight in 4927, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4927)
0.06966591 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 4927) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06966591 = score(doc=4927,freq=6.0), product of:
0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.5959982 = fieldWeight in 4927, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4927)
0.046620894 = weight(_text_:classification in 4927) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046620894 = score(doc=4927,freq=6.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.48755667 = fieldWeight in 4927, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4927)
0.2857143 = coord(4/14)
- Abstract
- Discusses the work of the Section on Classification and Indexing, covering the working group on principles underlying subject heading languages; a state of the art survey of subject heading systems; requirements for a format for classification data; DDC edition 20; open programs at the Istanbul conference; the section newsletter; and cooperative projects
- Source
- International cataloguing and bibliographic control. 25(1996) no.1, S.6-7
-
Cataloging and classification standards and rules (1996)
0.05
0.045258246 = product of:
0.15840386 = sum of:
0.02546139 = weight(_text_:subject in 57) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02546139 = score(doc=57,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.23709705 = fieldWeight in 57, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=57)
0.045140486 = weight(_text_:classification in 57) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045140486 = score(doc=57,freq=10.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.4720747 = fieldWeight in 57, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=57)
0.042661484 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 57) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042661484 = score(doc=57,freq=4.0), product of:
0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.3649729 = fieldWeight in 57, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=57)
0.045140486 = weight(_text_:classification in 57) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045140486 = score(doc=57,freq=10.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.4720747 = fieldWeight in 57, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=57)
0.2857143 = coord(4/14)
- Abstract
- Issue devoted to the theme: cataloguing and classification standards and rules
- Content
- Enthält die Beiträge: McCALLUM, S.: What makes a standard?; HOLLEY, R.P.: IFLA and international standards in the area of bibliographical control; STERN, B.: Internationalizing the rules in AACR2: adopting and translating AACR2 for use in non-Anglo-American and non-English-speaking cataloging environments; GUILES, K., R. EWALD u. B. TILLETT: The evolution of LCRIs: from de facto standards to ?; SPICHER, K.M.: The development of the MARC format; THOMAS, S.E.: The core bibliographic record and the program for cooperative cataloging; PALOWITCH, C. u. L. HOROWITZ: Meta-information structures for networked information resources; KUHAGEN, J.A.: Standards for name and series authority records; WILLIAMSON, N.: Standards and rules for subject access; GUENTHER, R.S.: Automating the Library of Congress Classification Scheme: implementation of the USMARC Format for Classification Data; LEAZER, G.H.: Recent research on the sequential bibliographical relationship and its implications for standards and the library catalog: an examination of serials
- Footnote
- Rez. in: RQ 36(1996) no.2, S.313-314 (L. Chase); International cataloguing and bibliographic control 27(1998) no.1, S.27 (C. Oliver)
- Series
- Cataloging and classification quarterly; vol.21, nos.3/4
-
USMARC format for classification data : including guidelines for content designation (1991)
0.04
0.041994907 = product of:
0.19597623 = sum of:
0.074478 = weight(_text_:classification in 4372) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.074478 = score(doc=4372,freq=20.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.7788835 = fieldWeight in 4372, product of:
4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
20.0 = termFreq=20.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4372)
0.047020227 = product of:
0.09404045 = sum of:
0.09404045 = weight(_text_:schemes in 4372) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09404045 = score(doc=4372,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16067243 = queryWeight, product of:
5.3512506 = idf(docFreq=569, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.58529305 = fieldWeight in 4372, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.3512506 = idf(docFreq=569, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4372)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.074478 = weight(_text_:classification in 4372) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.074478 = score(doc=4372,freq=20.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.7788835 = fieldWeight in 4372, product of:
4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
20.0 = termFreq=20.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4372)
0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
- Abstract
- Format specifications for the communication of MARC classification records, which may be used in online public catalog retrieval systems, in systems to maintain and develop classification schedules, and in online systems for library classifiers. Defines the codes and conventions (tags, indicators, subfield codes, and codes values) that identify the data elements in the records. Developed to support the 2 major US classification schemes: Library of Congress Classification and Dewey Decimal Classification, but also lets you communicate other classification schemes. Includes a glossary of classification terms and full record examples of LCC, DDC, NLM classification and UDC
- Object
- USMARC for classification data
-
Guenther, R.S.: Automating the Library of Congress Classification Scheme : implementation of the USMARC format for classification data (1996)
0.04
0.04101864 = product of:
0.19142032 = sum of:
0.07811319 = weight(_text_:classification in 5578) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07811319 = score(doc=5578,freq=22.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.81689996 = fieldWeight in 5578, product of:
4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
22.0 = termFreq=22.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5578)
0.035193928 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 5578) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035193928 = score(doc=5578,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.30108726 = fieldWeight in 5578, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5578)
0.07811319 = weight(_text_:classification in 5578) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07811319 = score(doc=5578,freq=22.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.81689996 = fieldWeight in 5578, product of:
4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
22.0 = termFreq=22.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5578)
0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
- Abstract
- Potential uses for classification data in machine readable form and reasons for the development of a standard, the USMARC Format for Classification Data, which allows for classification data to interact with other USMARC bibliographic and authority data are discussed. The development, structure, content, and use of the standard is reviewed with implementation decisions for the Library of Congress Classification scheme noted. The author examines the implementation of USMARC classification at LC, the conversion of the schedules, and the functionality of the software being used. Problems in the effort are explored, and enhancements desired for the online classification system are considered.
- Footnote
- Beitrag eines Themenheftes "Cataloging and Classification Standards and Rules"
- Object
- USMARC for classification data
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 21(1996) nos.3/4, S.177-203
-
Standards for the international exchange of bibliographic information : papers presented at a course held at the School of Library, Archive and Information Studies, University College London, 3-18 August 1990 (1991)
0.04
0.035560314 = product of:
0.12446109 = sum of:
0.033948522 = weight(_text_:subject in 7884) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033948522 = score(doc=7884,freq=8.0), product of:
0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.31612942 = fieldWeight in 7884, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=7884)
0.013458292 = weight(_text_:classification in 7884) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013458292 = score(doc=7884,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.14074548 = fieldWeight in 7884, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=7884)
0.06359599 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 7884) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06359599 = score(doc=7884,freq=20.0), product of:
0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.54406947 = fieldWeight in 7884, product of:
4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
20.0 = termFreq=20.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=7884)
0.013458292 = weight(_text_:classification in 7884) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013458292 = score(doc=7884,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.14074548 = fieldWeight in 7884, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=7884)
0.2857143 = coord(4/14)
- Abstract
- 31 papers consider the major international bodies concerned with standards and the problems associated with special forms and different scripts. The creation of bibliographic records including the role of national bibliographic agencies is considered. Standards for subject access and the impact of automation are also covered
- Content
- Enthält u.a. die Beiträge: TEMPLETON, R.: The Library Association's role in developing standards; HARRISON, H.P.: Special materials and problems: standards for audiovisual materials; ANDERSON, D.: Selections of bibliographic standards and the processes of standardization; GILCHRIST, A.: The standards jungle; BOURNE, R.: The IFLA UBCIM programme: standards in the changing world; ROBERTS, W.: The role of IFLA in framing and promoting bibliographic standards; HILL, M.W.: Standards for information handling: needs and dilemmas; JUSU-SHERIFF, G.: Standardization: an African viewpoint; BISWAS, S.C.: Standardization of bibliographic control in South Asia; CROUCHER, M.: The British National Bibliography: an historical perspective; BUCKLEY, B.J.: CD-ROM at the British Library; HOPKINSON, A.: Information transfer and exchange formats; HESELTINE, R.G.: Library automation in the 1990s: the open systems future; GRAVES, S.E.: Problems of serials control; ODDY, P.: Authority control in the local, national and international environment; MITCHELL, J.: Library co-operatives: bibliographic databases; BROWN, S.: Angl-American cataloguing rules; MORELELI-CACOURIS, M. u. M. SKEPASTIANU: Cataloguing practices in Greece; MUN, K.S.: Bibliographic description and information exchange in Southeast Asia: a survey; CURWEN, A.G.: International standard bibliographic description; HANCOCK-BEAULIEU, M.: Bibliographic standards and the online catalogue user; WILLIAMSON, N.J.: Subject cataloguing and LCSH; AITCHISON, J.: Subject control: thesaurus construction standards; SWEENEY, R.: Dewey Decimal Classification: an international standard; McILWAINE, I.C.: Present role and future policy for UDC as a standard for subject control; BUXTON, A.B.: UDC in online systems; BUXTON, A.B.: International gateways; BUXTON, A.B.: Common command languages
-
Guenther, R.S.: ¬The USMARC Format for Classification Data : development and implementation (1992)
0.03
0.034413483 = product of:
0.16059625 = sum of:
0.060187314 = weight(_text_:classification in 2996) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.060187314 = score(doc=2996,freq=10.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.6294329 = fieldWeight in 2996, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2996)
0.04022163 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 2996) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04022163 = score(doc=2996,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.34409973 = fieldWeight in 2996, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2996)
0.060187314 = weight(_text_:classification in 2996) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.060187314 = score(doc=2996,freq=10.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.6294329 = fieldWeight in 2996, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2996)
0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
- Abstract
- This paper discusses the newly developed USMARC Format for Classification Data. It reviews its potential uses within an online system and its development as one of the USMARC standards for representing bibliographic and related information in machine-readable form. It provides a summary of the fields in the format, and considers the prospects for its implementation.
- Object
- USMARC for classification data
- Source
- Classification research for knowledge representation and organization. Proc. 5th Int. Study Conf. on Classification Research, Toronto, Canada, 24.-28.6.1991. Ed. by N.J. Williamson u. M. Hudon
-
Caplan, P.; Guenther, R.: Metadata for Internet resources : the Dublin Core Metadata Elements Set and its mapping to USMARC (1996)
0.03
0.033447683 = product of:
0.11706689 = sum of:
0.026916584 = weight(_text_:classification in 2408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026916584 = score(doc=2408,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.28149095 = fieldWeight in 2408, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2408)
0.04022163 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 2408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04022163 = score(doc=2408,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.34409973 = fieldWeight in 2408, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2408)
0.026916584 = weight(_text_:classification in 2408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026916584 = score(doc=2408,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.28149095 = fieldWeight in 2408, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2408)
0.02301209 = product of:
0.04602418 = sum of:
0.04602418 = weight(_text_:22 in 2408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04602418 = score(doc=2408,freq=4.0), product of:
0.10514317 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2408, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2408)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(4/14)
- Date
- 13. 1.2007 18:31:22
- Footnote
- Simultaneously published as Electronic Resources: Selection and Bibliographic Control
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.43-58
-
Holley, R.P.: IFLA and international standards in the area of bibliographic control (1996)
0.03
0.03274764 = product of:
0.15282232 = sum of:
0.033307575 = weight(_text_:classification in 5572) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033307575 = score(doc=5572,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.34832728 = fieldWeight in 5572, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5572)
0.08620717 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 5572) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08620717 = score(doc=5572,freq=12.0), product of:
0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.73751014 = fieldWeight in 5572, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5572)
0.033307575 = weight(_text_:classification in 5572) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033307575 = score(doc=5572,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.34832728 = fieldWeight in 5572, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5572)
0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
- Abstract
- The Division of Bibliographic Control of the International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions (IFLA) has taken an active role in standard setting to foster universal bibliographic control (UBC). UBC is built upon the assumption that a national cataloging agency will catalog national imprints and then share the records nationally and internationally. Standards in support of UBC include the International Standard Bibliographic Descriptions, UNIMARC, authority lists, and miscellaneous guidelines. The IFLA standard setting process requires consensus building and compromise among the various traditions of bibliographic control. The increasing importance of library networks and the internationalization of bibliographic control may reduce the importance of IFLA as a standard setting body.
- Footnote
- Beitrag eines Themenheftes "Cataloging and Classification Standards and Rules"
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 21(1996) nos.3/4, S.17-36
-
Weber, L.B.: Reading formatting MARC AMC (1990)
0.03
0.031521946 = product of:
0.11032681 = sum of:
0.026916584 = weight(_text_:classification in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026916584 = score(doc=484,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.28149095 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
0.04022163 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04022163 = score(doc=484,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.34409973 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
0.026916584 = weight(_text_:classification in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026916584 = score(doc=484,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.28149095 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
0.016272005 = product of:
0.03254401 = sum of:
0.03254401 = weight(_text_:22 in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03254401 = score(doc=484,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10514317 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(4/14)
- Abstract
- This paper discusses how archivists use the MARC AMC format to exchange information about archival materials. The paper explains the modifications that MARC AMC introduced to the MARC bibliographic formats; gives examples of a record in generic USMARC AMC, RLIN AMC, and OCLC AMC; and considers the possible impact of format integration. The paper concludes with some thoughts about the changes that MARC AMC is causing in the archival profession.
- Date
- 8. 1.2007 14:22:51
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 11(1990) nos.3/4, S.117-143
-
Parker, V.: MARC tags for cataloging cartographic materials (1999)
0.03
0.031166047 = product of:
0.14544155 = sum of:
0.04758225 = weight(_text_:classification in 5317) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04758225 = score(doc=5317,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.49761042 = fieldWeight in 5317, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5317)
0.05027704 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 5317) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05027704 = score(doc=5317,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.43012467 = fieldWeight in 5317, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5317)
0.04758225 = weight(_text_:classification in 5317) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04758225 = score(doc=5317,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.49761042 = fieldWeight in 5317, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5317)
0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
- Footnote
- Teil eines Themenheftes zu: "Maps and related cartographic materials: cataloging, classification, and bibliographic control"
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 27(1999) nos.1/2, S.5-9
-
Leazer, G.H.: Recent research on the sequential bibliographic relationship and its implications for standards and the library catalog : an examination of serials (1996)
0.03
0.031138109 = product of:
0.14531118 = sum of:
0.033307575 = weight(_text_:classification in 5579) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033307575 = score(doc=5579,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.34832728 = fieldWeight in 5579, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5579)
0.07869602 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 5579) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07869602 = score(doc=5579,freq=10.0), product of:
0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.6732516 = fieldWeight in 5579, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5579)
0.033307575 = weight(_text_:classification in 5579) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033307575 = score(doc=5579,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.34832728 = fieldWeight in 5579, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5579)
0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
- Abstract
- Evaluates current research into bibliographic relationships sparked off by B.B. Tillett's taxonomy of bibliographic relationships (LRTS 35(1991) no.4, S.393-405) and R.P. Smiraglia's taxonomy of the derivative bibliographic relationship (PhD dissertation, Chicago Univ., Graduate Library School, 1992). These researches provide the context for a discussion of recent research and standards work. Reevaluates research on the sequential relationship drawn from work conducted on periodicals and the implications of that research is applied to cataloguing system design. Evaluates the conceptual designs proposed by researchers such as G.H. Leazer and M. Gorman's and uses them in a critique of the USMARC format for bibliographic description
- Footnote
- Beitrag eines Themenheftes "Cataloging and Classification Standards and Rules"
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 21(1996) nos.3/4, S.205-220
-
Ranta, J.A.: Queens Borough Public Library's Guidelines for cataloging community information (1996)
0.03
0.02952891 = product of:
0.10335118 = sum of:
0.042009152 = weight(_text_:subject in 6523) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042009152 = score(doc=6523,freq=4.0), product of:
0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.3911902 = fieldWeight in 6523, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6523)
0.023552012 = weight(_text_:classification in 6523) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023552012 = score(doc=6523,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.24630459 = fieldWeight in 6523, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6523)
0.023552012 = weight(_text_:classification in 6523) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023552012 = score(doc=6523,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.24630459 = fieldWeight in 6523, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6523)
0.014238005 = product of:
0.02847601 = sum of:
0.02847601 = weight(_text_:22 in 6523) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02847601 = score(doc=6523,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10514317 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6523, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6523)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(4/14)
- Abstract
- Currently, few resources exist to guide libraries in the cataloguing of community information using the new USMARC Format for Cammunity Information (1993). In developing a community information database, Queens Borough Public Library, New York City, formulated their own cataloguing procedures for applying AACR2, LoC File Interpretations, and USMARC Format for Community Information to community information. Their practices include entering corporate names directly whenever possible and assigning LC subject headings for classes of persons and topics, adding neighbourhood level geographic subdivisions. The guidelines were specially designed to aid non cataloguers in cataloguing community information and have enabled library to maintain consistency in handling corporate names and in assigning subject headings, while creating database that is highly accessible to library staff and users
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) no.2, S.51-69
-
McCallum, S.: What makes a standard? (1996)
0.03
0.02850291 = product of:
0.13301358 = sum of:
0.0380658 = weight(_text_:classification in 5104) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0380658 = score(doc=5104,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.39808834 = fieldWeight in 5104, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5104)
0.056881975 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 5104) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056881975 = score(doc=5104,freq=4.0), product of:
0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.4866305 = fieldWeight in 5104, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5104)
0.0380658 = weight(_text_:classification in 5104) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0380658 = score(doc=5104,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.39808834 = fieldWeight in 5104, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5104)
0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
- Abstract
- Describes the characteristics of de jure standards developed by the formal standards organizations (ISO, ANSI, and NISO) and formal industry groups, and de facto standards developed by informal, self selected groups and companies. Compares this process with that used to develop Internet standards. Examines 3 key standards for the library community on this basis: standards that form the basis for encoding bibliographic data (MARC); standards for electronic documents (SGML-based), and standards for ordering and purchasing bibliographic items (EDIFACT-based)
- Footnote
- Beitrag eines Themenheftes "Cataloging and Classification Standards and Rules"
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 21(1996) nos.3/4, S.5-15
-
Michard, A.; Pham Dac, D.: Description of collections and encyclopedias on the Web using XML (1998)
0.03
0.027829072 = product of:
0.129869 = sum of:
0.0380658 = weight(_text_:classification in 3493) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0380658 = score(doc=3493,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.39808834 = fieldWeight in 3493, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3493)
0.053737402 = product of:
0.107474804 = sum of:
0.107474804 = weight(_text_:schemes in 3493) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.107474804 = score(doc=3493,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16067243 = queryWeight, product of:
5.3512506 = idf(docFreq=569, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.66890633 = fieldWeight in 3493, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.3512506 = idf(docFreq=569, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3493)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.0380658 = weight(_text_:classification in 3493) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0380658 = score(doc=3493,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.39808834 = fieldWeight in 3493, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3493)
0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
- Abstract
- Cataloguing artworks relies on the availability of classification schemes, often represented by hierarchical thesauri. Comments on the limitations of current practices and tools and proposes a new approach for the cooperative production of multilingual and multicultural classification schemes exploiting some features of the oncoming Extensible Markup Language based Web
-
Aliprand, J.M.: Linking of alternate graphic representation in USMARC authority records (1993)
0.02
0.023724673 = product of:
0.11071514 = sum of:
0.026916584 = weight(_text_:classification in 8341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026916584 = score(doc=8341,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.28149095 = fieldWeight in 8341, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8341)
0.056881975 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 8341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056881975 = score(doc=8341,freq=4.0), product of:
0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.4866305 = fieldWeight in 8341, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8341)
0.026916584 = weight(_text_:classification in 8341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026916584 = score(doc=8341,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.28149095 = fieldWeight in 8341, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8341)
0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
- Abstract
- Discusses the facilities in USMARC for linking fields containing non Roman scripts to their Romanized counterparts. In USMARC authority records, the 880 field: Alternate graphic representation (which contains the authentic non Roman text); is linked to the field that contains the same information in romanized form. The 880 field was added to the USMARC Format for Bibliographic Data in 1984 and to the USMARC Format for Authority Data in 1991. The new data elements in the Authority Format are modeled on those of the Bibliographic Format
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 18(1993) no.1, S.27-62
-
Aliprand, J.M.: Linkage in USMARC bibliographic records (1993)
0.02
0.023156079 = product of:
0.1080617 = sum of:
0.023552012 = weight(_text_:classification in 544) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023552012 = score(doc=544,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.24630459 = fieldWeight in 544, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=544)
0.060957674 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 544) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.060957674 = score(doc=544,freq=6.0), product of:
0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.52149844 = fieldWeight in 544, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=544)
0.023552012 = weight(_text_:classification in 544) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023552012 = score(doc=544,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.24630459 = fieldWeight in 544, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=544)
0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
- Abstract
- USMARC records that contain non Roman scripts exhibit 2 types of linkage between the Latin script fields and their alternate graphic representation (the non Roman text): linkage based on systematic romanization, and linkage between names for the same person, place or thing. The lack of rules for linkage inhibits copy cataloging and causes inconsistency on record displays. To determine an unequivocal basis for linkage, 4 types of field association in bibliographic records are examined: hierarchy of components; functional equivalence; semantic equivalence; and systematic romanization. Concludes that semantic equivalence is the ideal basis for linkage and can be accomodated by the current structure of the USMARC format for bibliographic data
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 16(1993) no.1, S.5-38
-
Woods, E.W.; IFLA Section on classification and Indexing and Indexing and Information Technology; Joint Working Group on a Classification Format: Requirements for a format of classification data : Final report, July 1996 (1996)
0.02
0.02307136 = product of:
0.16149952 = sum of:
0.08074976 = weight(_text_:classification in 3008) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08074976 = score(doc=3008,freq=8.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.8444729 = fieldWeight in 3008, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3008)
0.08074976 = weight(_text_:classification in 3008) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08074976 = score(doc=3008,freq=8.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.8444729 = fieldWeight in 3008, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3008)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
- Object
- USMARC for classification data
-
Spicher, K.M.: ¬The development of the MARC format (1996)
0.02
0.021816231 = product of:
0.10180908 = sum of:
0.033307575 = weight(_text_:classification in 5574) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033307575 = score(doc=5574,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.34832728 = fieldWeight in 5574, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5574)
0.035193928 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 5574) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035193928 = score(doc=5574,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.30108726 = fieldWeight in 5574, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5574)
0.033307575 = weight(_text_:classification in 5574) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033307575 = score(doc=5574,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.34832728 = fieldWeight in 5574, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5574)
0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
- Abstract
- The use of computerized cataloguing data requires a commitment on the part of libraries to the standardization of data elements and record formats. Early computerized formats were initiated by several research libraries to serve the needs of particular university systems. In developing MARC, the LoC drew on the experiences of these libraries in establishing a standard acceptable to the research library community for the interchange of bibliographic data. Discusses early computerized formats influencing MARC, the origins of the MARC Pilot Project, and design factors influencing the evolution of the format through MARC2. Research was based on primary sources documenting the early history of MARC, including unpublished documents in the LoC archives
- Footnote
- Beitrag eines Themenheftes "Cataloging and Classification Standards and Rules"
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 21(1996) nos.3/4, S.75-90
-
Recommandation 995 (1995)
0.02
0.020154601 = product of:
0.0940548 = sum of:
0.026916584 = weight(_text_:classification in 4689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026916584 = score(doc=4689,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.28149095 = fieldWeight in 4689, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4689)
0.04022163 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 4689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04022163 = score(doc=4689,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.34409973 = fieldWeight in 4689, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4689)
0.026916584 = weight(_text_:classification in 4689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026916584 = score(doc=4689,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.28149095 = fieldWeight in 4689, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4689)
0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
- Abstract
- Text of a document produced by the French Librarians Association, Federation of Library Software Users and the Association of Directors of Departmental Lending Libraries, setting out standards for local data included in bibliographic notices in UNIMARC format. These are specifically intended for loan copies sent from central to branch libraries, for integration into the local catalogue. The subfields (MARC field 995) are: origin of document; bar code; classification code and loan details; details of contents, support etc; and notes on physical features
-
Guenther, R.S.: ¬The Library of Congress Classification in the USMARC format (1994)
0.02
0.017803647 = product of:
0.12462553 = sum of:
0.062312763 = weight(_text_:classification in 8864) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.062312763 = score(doc=8864,freq=14.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.6516607 = fieldWeight in 8864, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=8864)
0.062312763 = weight(_text_:classification in 8864) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.062312763 = score(doc=8864,freq=14.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.6516607 = fieldWeight in 8864, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=8864)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
- Abstract
- The paper reviews the development of the USMARC Format for Classification Data, a standard for communication of classification data in machine-readable form. It considers the uses for online classification schedules, both for technical services and reference functions and gives an overview of the format specification details of data elements used and of the structure of the records. The paper describes an experiment conducted at the Library of Congress to test the format as well as the development of the classification database encompassing the LCC schedules. Features of the classification system are given. The LoC will complete its conversion of the LCC in mid-1995
- Object
- USMARC for classification data
