-
Ross, J.: ¬The impact of technology on indexing (2000)
0.03
0.026927408 = product of:
0.053854816 = sum of:
0.053854816 = product of:
0.10770963 = sum of:
0.10770963 = weight(_text_:22 in 263) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10770963 = score(doc=263,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1739941 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049686626 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 263, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=263)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.25-26
-
Walker, A.: Indexing commonplace books : John Locke's method (2001)
0.03
0.026927408 = product of:
0.053854816 = sum of:
0.053854816 = product of:
0.10770963 = sum of:
0.10770963 = weight(_text_:22 in 13) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10770963 = score(doc=13,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1739941 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049686626 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 13, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=13)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.14-18
-
Crystal, D.: Quote index unquote (2000)
0.03
0.026927408 = product of:
0.053854816 = sum of:
0.053854816 = product of:
0.10770963 = sum of:
0.10770963 = weight(_text_:22 in 487) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10770963 = score(doc=487,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1739941 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049686626 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 487, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=487)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.14-20
-
Matthews, D.: Indexing published letters (2001)
0.03
0.026927408 = product of:
0.053854816 = sum of:
0.053854816 = product of:
0.10770963 = sum of:
0.10770963 = weight(_text_:22 in 4160) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10770963 = score(doc=4160,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1739941 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049686626 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4160, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4160)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.135-141
-
Gratch, B.; Settel, B.; Atherton, P.: Characteristics of book indexes for subject retrieval in the humanities and social sciences (1978)
0.02
0.023561481 = product of:
0.047122963 = sum of:
0.047122963 = product of:
0.094245926 = sum of:
0.094245926 = weight(_text_:22 in 1061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.094245926 = score(doc=1061,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1739941 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049686626 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1061, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1061)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Indexer. 11(1978), S.14-22
-
Davis, M.: Building a global legal index : a work in progress (2001)
0.02
0.023561481 = product of:
0.047122963 = sum of:
0.047122963 = product of:
0.094245926 = sum of:
0.094245926 = weight(_text_:22 in 6443) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.094245926 = score(doc=6443,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1739941 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049686626 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6443, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6443)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.123-127
-
Browne, G.: ¬The definite article : acknowledging The in index entries (2001)
0.02
0.023561481 = product of:
0.047122963 = sum of:
0.047122963 = product of:
0.094245926 = sum of:
0.094245926 = weight(_text_:22 in 12) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.094245926 = score(doc=12,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1739941 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049686626 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 12, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=12)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.119-122
-
Weinberg, B.H.: Book indexes in France : medieval specimens and modern practices (2000)
0.02
0.023561481 = product of:
0.047122963 = sum of:
0.047122963 = product of:
0.094245926 = sum of:
0.094245926 = weight(_text_:22 in 486) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.094245926 = score(doc=486,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1739941 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049686626 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 486, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=486)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.2-13
-
Mauer, P.: Embedded indexing : pros and cons for the indexer (2000)
0.02
0.023561481 = product of:
0.047122963 = sum of:
0.047122963 = product of:
0.094245926 = sum of:
0.094245926 = weight(_text_:22 in 488) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.094245926 = score(doc=488,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1739941 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049686626 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 488, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=488)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.27-28
-
Anderson, C.R.: Indexing with a computer : past and present (2000)
0.02
0.023561481 = product of:
0.047122963 = sum of:
0.047122963 = product of:
0.094245926 = sum of:
0.094245926 = weight(_text_:22 in 489) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.094245926 = score(doc=489,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1739941 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049686626 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 489, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=489)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.23-24
-
Lee, D.: Judging indexes : the criteria for a good index (2001)
0.02
0.023561481 = product of:
0.047122963 = sum of:
0.047122963 = product of:
0.094245926 = sum of:
0.094245926 = weight(_text_:22 in 4162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.094245926 = score(doc=4162,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1739941 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049686626 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4162, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4162)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2001) no.4, S.191-194
-
Weinberg, B.H.: Predecessors of scientific indexing structures in the domain of religion (2001)
0.02
0.023561481 = product of:
0.047122963 = sum of:
0.047122963 = product of:
0.094245926 = sum of:
0.094245926 = weight(_text_:22 in 4172) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.094245926 = score(doc=4172,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1739941 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049686626 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4172, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4172)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2001) no.4, S.178-180
-
Weinberg, B.H.: Index structures in early Hebrew Biblical word lists : preludes to the first Latin concordances (2004)
0.02
0.023561481 = product of:
0.047122963 = sum of:
0.047122963 = product of:
0.094245926 = sum of:
0.094245926 = weight(_text_:22 in 4180) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.094245926 = score(doc=4180,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1739941 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049686626 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4180, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4180)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 17.10.2005 13:54:22
-
Bell, H.K.: Indexing biographies, and other stories of human lives (1992)
0.02
0.020195555 = product of:
0.04039111 = sum of:
0.04039111 = product of:
0.08078222 = sum of:
0.08078222 = weight(_text_:22 in 5396) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08078222 = score(doc=5396,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1739941 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049686626 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 5396, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5396)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Knowledge organization 22(1995) no.1, S.46-47 (R. Fugmann)
-
Lathrop, L.: ¬An indexer's guide to the Internet (1999)
0.02
0.020195555 = product of:
0.04039111 = sum of:
0.04039111 = product of:
0.08078222 = sum of:
0.08078222 = weight(_text_:22 in 485) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08078222 = score(doc=485,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1739941 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049686626 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 485, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=485)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Indexer 22(2000) no.1, S.51 (R. Davis)
-
Weinberg, B.H.: ¬The body of a reference work in relation to its index : an analysis of wordsmanship (1996)
0.02
0.019040553 = product of:
0.038081106 = sum of:
0.038081106 = product of:
0.07616221 = sum of:
0.07616221 = weight(_text_:22 in 6940) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07616221 = score(doc=6940,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1739941 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049686626 = queryNorm
0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 6940, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6940)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 8. 3.1997 20:22:25
- Source
- Indexer. 20(1996) no.1, S.18-22
-
Olason, S.C.: Let's get usable! : Usability studies for indexes (2000)
0.02
0.019040553 = product of:
0.038081106 = sum of:
0.038081106 = product of:
0.07616221 = sum of:
0.07616221 = weight(_text_:22 in 882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07616221 = score(doc=882,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1739941 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049686626 = queryNorm
0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 882, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=882)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Vgl.: http://www.theindexer.org/files/22-2-olason.pdf.
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.2, S.91-95
-
Bell, H.K.: History of societies of indexing : part VII: 1992-95 (2000)
0.02
0.01682963 = product of:
0.03365926 = sum of:
0.03365926 = product of:
0.06731852 = sum of:
0.06731852 = weight(_text_:22 in 113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06731852 = score(doc=113,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1739941 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049686626 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 113, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=113)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.2, S.81-83
-
Stauber, D.M.: Facing the text : content and structure in book indexing (2004)
0.02
0.016224554 = product of:
0.032449108 = sum of:
0.032449108 = product of:
0.064898215 = sum of:
0.064898215 = weight(_text_:styles in 5040) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.064898215 = score(doc=5040,freq=2.0), product of:
0.3416753 = queryWeight, product of:
6.8766055 = idf(docFreq=123, maxDocs=44218)
0.049686626 = queryNorm
0.1899412 = fieldWeight in 5040, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.8766055 = idf(docFreq=123, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=5040)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: KO 32(2005) no.3, S.135-136 (N. Bridge): "Authors of books have usually lived with their material for years before they embark on the arduous business of writing the book, followed by the revisiting during the editing and publishing processes. The indexers of their books usually have between two and four weeks to absorb the subject of the book. Even with a prior knowledge of the discipline, they are faced with the author's particular "take" on the subject and writing style, including any one of a number of ways of presenting the material. This is multiplied in complexity when the book is a multiauthored work, a collection of essays and papers, comprising several authors' differing views and individual styles. Ideally, the indexer is an expert in the subject matter of the book, perfectly matched to the book; in practice, this almost never happens. Indexers aim at producing an index that is truly reflective of the individual book and its author, a goal that often seems overwhelming when the pile of page proofs arrives with the courier, or electronically through a PDF file, hundreds of pages of closely argued text. As well as the time limit, there can be other restrictions, most commonly having to make the index fit into the number of pages decreed by the publisher, with difficult, even agonizing decisions lying ahead. Consequently, indexers can fall into a number of different traps: getting lost in a welter of detailed overindexing; or, mindful of time and space limits, indexing too broadly and simplistically, bouncing from text heading to heading, topic sentence to topic sentence. Most indexers of academic books I know, including myself, tend to fall into the first category at least with their first few indexes. Especially when the content is personally fascinating, it's easy to lose a rational, analytical approach to the content of a book, and wrest this back only with difficulty during the editing stage with the deadline looming. Do Mi Stauber's title, Facing the Text, is, thus, provocative, because that's what all indexers inevitably have to do. She knows the process: for example, at the start, the "gap between you and those pages that for a moment seems very wide" (p. 1). This sympathetic, personal tone pervades the book: the emphasis is on the personal experiences, feelings, and perceptions of indexers when confronted by the various situations thrown up by indexing; it's "I" and "you" throughout. The chapter subheadings often echo this: my tendency to lose sight of main topics is explained and diagnosed in "Lost Among the Trees" (p. 63-64). The section "Being Stuck" (p. 324-26), describes a number of reasons for this common malady, along with remedies for each, including the "Hammock Method" (p. 46). Stauber has been presenting workshops with the title "Facing the Text" since 1997, and her book reflects a friendly, listening engagement with her audience.
-
Crawley, J.; Adams, C.: InfoAccess Project : comparing print, CD-ROM, and inhouse indexes (1991)
0.01
0.013463704 = product of:
0.026927408 = sum of:
0.026927408 = product of:
0.053854816 = sum of:
0.053854816 = weight(_text_:22 in 4824) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.053854816 = score(doc=4824,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1739941 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049686626 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4824, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4824)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Describes the InfoAccess Project at the Univ of Saskatchewan Libraries which compared searching of manual and automated indexes by 22 undergraduate psychology students to determine their searching preferences by ranking 'Psychological abstracts' in 3 formats: print, CD-ROM and a locally mounted tape service called InfoAccess. Their satisfaction regarding the physical environment, equipment, and instructional aids was also recorded. Users preferred to search with CD-ROM, but found InfoAccess to be an acceptable alternative
