Search (667 results, page 1 of 34)

0.12923664 = product of:
  0.25847328 = sum of:
    0.25847328 = sum of:
      0.22481403 = weight(_text_:styles in 4218) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.22481403 = score(doc=4218,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.3416753 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.8766055 = idf(docFreq=123, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049686626 = queryNorm
          0.6579756 = fieldWeight in 4218, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            6.8766055 = idf(docFreq=123, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4218)
      0.03365926 = weight(_text_:22 in 4218) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03365926 = score(doc=4218,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1739941 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049686626 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4218, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4218)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

The discovery and retrieval of video games in library and information systems is, by and large, dependent on a limited set of descriptive metadata. Noticeably missing from this metadata are classifications of visual style-despite the overwhelmingly visual nature of most video games and the interest in visual style among video game users. One explanation for this paucity is the difficulty in eliciting consistent judgements about visual style, likely due to subjective interpretations of terminology and a lack of demonstrable testing for coinciding judgements. This study presents a taxonomy of video game visual styles constructed from the findings of a 22-participant cataloging user study of visual styles. A detailed description of the study, and its value and shortcomings, are presented along with reflections about the challenges of cultivating consensus about visual style in video games. The high degree of overall agreement in the user study demonstrates the potential value of a descriptor like visual style and the use of a cataloging study in developing visual style taxonomies. The resulting visual style taxonomy, the methods and analysis described herein may help improve the organization and retrieval of video games and possibly other visual materials like graphic designs, illustrations, and animations.

0.10762151 = product of:
  0.21524303 = sum of:
    0.21524303 = product of:
      0.43048605 = sum of:
        0.43048605 = weight(_text_:styles in 1281) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.43048605 = score(doc=1281,freq=22.0), product of:
            0.3416753 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.8766055 = idf(docFreq=123, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049686626 = queryNorm
            1.2599273 = fieldWeight in 1281, product of:
              4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                22.0 = termFreq=22.0
              6.8766055 = idf(docFreq=123, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1281)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Previous studies have shown that users' cognitive styles play an important role during web searching. However, only a limited number of studies have showed the relationship between cognitive styles and web search behavior. Most importantly, it is not clear which components of web search behavior are influenced by cognitive styles. This article examines the relationships between users' cognitive styles and their web searching and develops a model that portrays the relationship. The study uses qualitative and quantitative analyses based on data gathered from 50 participants. A questionnaire was utilized to collect participants' demographic information, and Riding's (1991) Cognitive Styles Analysis (CSA) test to assess their cognitive styles. Results show that users' cognitive styles influenced their information-searching strategies, query reformulation behavior, web navigational styles, and information-processing approaches. The user model developed in this study depicts the fundamental relationships between users' web search behavior and their cognitive styles. Modeling web search behavior with a greater understanding of users' cognitive styles can help information science researchers and information systems designers to bridge the semantic gap between the user and the systems. Implications of the research for theory and practice, and future work, are discussed.

0.0870701 = product of:
  0.1741402 = sum of:
    0.1741402 = product of:
      0.3482804 = sum of:
        0.3482804 = weight(_text_:styles in 4939) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.3482804 = score(doc=4939,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.3416753 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.8766055 = idf(docFreq=123, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049686626 = queryNorm
            1.0193315 = fieldWeight in 4939, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              6.8766055 = idf(docFreq=123, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4939)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Building upon previous research on the concepts of inquiring minds and elicitation styles (Wu, 2005; Wu & Liu, 2003), this study aims to identify the relationships between the theoretical constructs of elicitation behavior and user satisfaction in terms of the relevance, utility, and satisfaction of search results, search interaction processes, and overall search activities. Descriptive statistical analysis is applied to compare the user satisfaction ratings with respect to the concepts of inquiring minds and elicitation styles. The results suggest that the stereotyped elicitation style received the lowest user satisfaction ratings compared with functionally and situationally oriented styles. It is suggested that the intermediaries take into account the characteristics of search questions and, accordingly, adapt their professional mindsets to search interview situations; that is, using an inquiring mind in the query formulation process as default mode with functional and situational styles of elicitations would be helpful for enhancing the user's satisfaction ratings. Future research is suggested to better understand and to improve professional talk in information services.

0.08172785 = product of:
  0.1634557 = sum of:
    0.1634557 = sum of:
      0.12979643 = weight(_text_:styles in 4200) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.12979643 = score(doc=4200,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.3416753 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.8766055 = idf(docFreq=123, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049686626 = queryNorm
          0.3798824 = fieldWeight in 4200, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            6.8766055 = idf(docFreq=123, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4200)
      0.03365926 = weight(_text_:22 in 4200) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03365926 = score(doc=4200,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1739941 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049686626 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4200, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4200)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

A huge number of informal messages are posted every day in social network sites, blogs, and discussion forums. Emotions seem to be frequently important in these texts for expressing friendship, showing social support or as part of online arguments. Algorithms to identify sentiment and sentiment strength are needed to help understand the role of emotion in this informal communication and also to identify inappropriate or anomalous affective utterances, potentially associated with threatening behavior to the self or others. Nevertheless, existing sentiment detection algorithms tend to be commercially oriented, designed to identify opinions about products rather than user behaviors. This article partly fills this gap with a new algorithm, SentiStrength, to extract sentiment strength from informal English text, using new methods to exploit the de facto grammars and spelling styles of cyberspace. Applied to MySpace comments and with a lookup table of term sentiment strengths optimized by machine learning, SentiStrength is able to predict positive emotion with 60.6% accuracy and negative emotion with 72.8% accuracy, both based upon strength scales of 1-5. The former, but not the latter, is better than baseline and a wide range of general machine learning approaches.

Date

22. 1.2011 14:29:23

0.07891554 = product of:
  0.15783107 = sum of:
    0.15783107 = product of:
      0.4734932 = sum of:
        0.4734932 = weight(_text_:3a in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.4734932 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.42124376 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049686626 = queryNorm
            1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fcreativechoice.org%2Fdoc%2FHansJonas.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1TM3teaYKgABL5H9yoIifA&opi=89978449.

0.07255841 = product of:
  0.14511682 = sum of:
    0.14511682 = product of:
      0.29023364 = sum of:
        0.29023364 = weight(_text_:styles in 2125) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.29023364 = score(doc=2125,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.3416753 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.8766055 = idf(docFreq=123, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049686626 = queryNorm
            0.84944284 = fieldWeight in 2125, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              6.8766055 = idf(docFreq=123, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2125)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Blogs are readily available sources of opinions and sentiments that in turn could influence the opinions of the blog readers. Previous studies have attempted to infer influence from blog features, but they have ignored the possible influence styles that describe the different ways in which influence is exerted. We propose a novel approach to analyzing bloggers' influence styles and using the influence styles as features to improve the performance of influence diffusion detection among linked bloggers. The proposed influence style (INFUSE) model describes bloggers' influence through their engagement style, persuasion style, and persona. Methods used include similarity analysis to detect the creating-sharing aspect of engagement style, subjectivity analysis to measure persuasion style, and sentiment analysis to identify persona style. We further extend the INFUSE model to detect influence diffusion among linked bloggers based on the bloggers' influence styles. The INFUSE model performed well with an average F1 score of 76% compared with the in-degree and sentiment-value baseline approaches. Previous studies have focused on the existence of influence among linked bloggers in detecting influence diffusion, but our INFUSE model is shown to provide a fine-grained description of the manner in which influence is diffused based on the bloggers' influence styles.

0.067444205 = product of:
  0.13488841 = sum of:
    0.13488841 = product of:
      0.26977682 = sum of:
        0.26977682 = weight(_text_:styles in 2400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.26977682 = score(doc=2400,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.3416753 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.8766055 = idf(docFreq=123, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049686626 = queryNorm
            0.7895707 = fieldWeight in 2400, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              6.8766055 = idf(docFreq=123, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2400)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

We propose a text classification tool based on support vector machines for the assessment of organizational leadership styles, as appearing to Twitter users. We collected Twitter data over 51 days, related to the first 30 Italian organizations in the 2015 ranking of Forbes Global 2000-out of which we selected the five with the most relevant volumes of tweets. We analyzed the communication of the company leaders, together with the dialogue among the stakeholders of each company, to understand the association with perceived leadership styles and dimensions. To assess leadership profiles, we referred to the 10-factor model developed by Barchiesi and La Bella in 2007. We maintain the distinctiveness of the approach we propose, as it allows a rapid assessment of the perceived leadership capabilities of an enterprise, as they emerge from its social media interactions. It can also be used to show how companies respond and manage their communication when specific events take place, and to assess their stakeholder's reactions.

0.065762945 = product of:
  0.13152589 = sum of:
    0.13152589 = product of:
      0.39457765 = sum of:
        0.39457765 = weight(_text_:3a in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.39457765 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.42124376 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049686626 = queryNorm
            0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F3131107&ei=HzFWVYvGMsiNsgGTyoFI&usg=AFQjCNE2FHUeR9oQTQlNC4TPedv4Mo3DaQ&sig2=Rlzpr7a3BLZZkqZCXXN_IA&bvm=bv.93564037,d.bGg&cad=rja

0.056203507 = product of:
  0.112407014 = sum of:
    0.112407014 = product of:
      0.22481403 = sum of:
        0.22481403 = weight(_text_:styles in 3961) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.22481403 = score(doc=3961,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.3416753 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.8766055 = idf(docFreq=123, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049686626 = queryNorm
            0.6579756 = fieldWeight in 3961, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              6.8766055 = idf(docFreq=123, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3961)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Purpose - Cognitive style has been identified to be significantly influential in deciding users' preferences of search engines. In particular, Witkin's field dependence/independence has been widely studied in the area of web searching. It has been suggested that this cognitive style has conceptual links with the holism/serialism. This study aims to investigate the differences between the field dependence/independence and holism/serialism. Design/methodology/approach - An empirical study was conducted with 120 students from a UK university. Riding's cognitive style analysis (CSA) and Ford's study preference questionnaire (SPQ) were used to identify the students' cognitive styles. A questionnaire was designed to identify users' preferences for the design of search engines. Data mining techniques were applied to analyse the data obtained from the empirical study. Findings - The results highlight three findings. First, a fundamental link is confirmed between the two cognitive styles. Second, the relationship between field dependent users and holists is suggested to be more prominent than that of field independent users and serialists. Third, the interface design preferences of field dependent and field independent users can be split more clearly than those of holists and serialists. Originality/value - The contributions of this study include a deeper understanding of the similarities and differences between field dependence/independence and holists/serialists as well as proposing a novel methodology for data analyses.

0.05506796 = product of:
  0.11013592 = sum of:
    0.11013592 = product of:
      0.22027184 = sum of:
        0.22027184 = weight(_text_:styles in 5219) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.22027184 = score(doc=5219,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.3416753 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.8766055 = idf(docFreq=123, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049686626 = queryNorm
            0.64468175 = fieldWeight in 5219, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              6.8766055 = idf(docFreq=123, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5219)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Publishing articles in high-impact English journals is difficult for scholars around the world, especially for non-native English-speaking scholars (NNESs), most of whom struggle with proficiency in English. To uncover the differences in English scientific writing between native English-speaking scholars (NESs) and NNESs, we collected a large-scale data set containing more than 150,000 full-text articles published in PLoS between 2006 and 2015. We divided these articles into three groups according to the ethnic backgrounds of the first and corresponding authors, obtained by Ethnea, and examined the scientific writing styles in English from a two-fold perspective of linguistic complexity: (a) syntactic complexity, including measurements of sentence length and sentence complexity; and (b) lexical complexity, including measurements of lexical diversity, lexical density, and lexical sophistication. The observations suggest marginal differences between groups in syntactical and lexical complexity.

0.046034064 = product of:
  0.09206813 = sum of:
    0.09206813 = product of:
      0.27620438 = sum of:
        0.27620438 = weight(_text_:3a in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.27620438 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.42124376 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049686626 = queryNorm
            0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Footnote

Rez. in: Philosophisch-ethische Rezensionen vom 09.11.2019 (Jürgen Czogalla), Unter: https://philosophisch-ethische-rezensionen.de/rezension/Goedert1.html. In: B.I.T. online 23(2020) H.3, S.345-347 (W. Sühl-Strohmenger) [Unter: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.b-i-t-online.de%2Fheft%2F2020-03-rezensionen.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0iY3f_zNcvEjeZ6inHVnOK]. In: Open Password Nr. 805 vom 14.08.2020 (H.-C. Hobohm) [Unter: https://www.password-online.de/?mailpoet_router&endpoint=view_in_browser&action=view&data=WzE0MywiOGI3NjZkZmNkZjQ1IiwwLDAsMTMxLDFd].

0.045889966 = product of:
  0.09177993 = sum of:
    0.09177993 = product of:
      0.18355986 = sum of:
        0.18355986 = weight(_text_:styles in 3043) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18355986 = score(doc=3043,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.3416753 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.8766055 = idf(docFreq=123, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049686626 = queryNorm
            0.5372348 = fieldWeight in 3043, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              6.8766055 = idf(docFreq=123, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3043)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Social media offers both opportunities and challenges in everyday life information seeking (ELIS). Despite their popularity, it is unclear whether the use of social media for ELIS heightens problematic outcomes, such as encountering too much information and finding irrelevant, conflicting, outdated, and noncredible information. In light of this gap, this study tested (a) whether the level of problematic informational outcomes varies with the use of social networking sites, microblogs, and social question and answer sites; (b) whether the problem level varies by gender and problem-solving styles; and (c) whether the aforementioned factors have significant interaction effects. An online questionnaire was used to survey 791 U.S. undergraduates. Irrelevant information was the top issue. Gender difference was statistically significant for conflicting information, which was more problematic for women. The multiway analysis of variance (ANOVA) indicated notable problem-solving style differences, especially on the Personal Control subscale. This highlights the importance of affective factors. It is noteworthy that although social media use has no significant main effect, there were significant interaction effects between microblog use and the Approach-Avoidance and Problem Solving Confidence subscales. The impact of microblog use on ELIS outcomes therefore warrants further investigation. Five propositions are posited for further testing.

0.03945777 = product of:
  0.07891554 = sum of:
    0.07891554 = product of:
      0.2367466 = sum of:
        0.2367466 = weight(_text_:3a in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2367466 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.42124376 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049686626 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Faclanthology.org%2FD19-5317.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0ZZFyq5wWTtNTvNkrvjlGA.

0.03945777 = product of:
  0.07891554 = sum of:
    0.07891554 = product of:
      0.2367466 = sum of:
        0.2367466 = weight(_text_:3a in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2367466 = score(doc=484,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.42124376 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049686626 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Footnote

https%3A%2F%2Fjournals.univie.ac.at%2Findex.php%2Fvoebm%2Farticle%2Fdownload%2F5332%2F5271%2F&usg=AOvVaw2yQdFGHlmOwVls7ANCpTii.

0.03893893 = product of:
  0.07787786 = sum of:
    0.07787786 = product of:
      0.15575571 = sum of:
        0.15575571 = weight(_text_:styles in 738) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15575571 = score(doc=738,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3416753 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.8766055 = idf(docFreq=123, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049686626 = queryNorm
            0.45585886 = fieldWeight in 738, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.8766055 = idf(docFreq=123, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=738)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Many recent studies on MEDLINE-based information seeking have shed light on scientists' behaviors and associated tool innovations that may improve efficiency and effectiveness. Few, if any, studies, however, examine scientists' problem-solving uses of PubMed in actual contexts of work and corresponding needs for better tool support. Addressing this gap, we conducted a field study of novice scientists (14 upper-level undergraduate majors in molecular biology) as they engaged in a problem-solving activity with PubMed in a laboratory setting. Findings reveal many common stages and patterns of information seeking across users as well as variations, especially variations in cognitive search styles. Based on these findings, we suggest tool improvements that both confirm and qualify many results found in other recent studies. Our findings highlight the need to use results from context-rich studies to inform decisions in tool design about when to offer improved features to users.

0.03893893 = product of:
  0.07787786 = sum of:
    0.07787786 = product of:
      0.15575571 = sum of:
        0.15575571 = weight(_text_:styles in 2348) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15575571 = score(doc=2348,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3416753 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.8766055 = idf(docFreq=123, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049686626 = queryNorm
            0.45585886 = fieldWeight in 2348, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.8766055 = idf(docFreq=123, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2348)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

In this brief contribution I argue that an apparent dichotomy between information behavior seen as the behavior of individuals and their respective information styles and information behavior considered as a social practice may be resolved by considering the underresearched corporeality of the human body aka embodiment, which is a fundamental aspect of any kind of behavior, including information behavior. Practice is inherently embodied too, which means embodiment can be utilized as a vantage point to seek conceptual grounding for the rather diverse range of theories and models in information behavior research. The challenge then is to articulate in what ways and on what levels a particular approach contributes to advancing information behavior research. Conceptual clarity would also help information behavior models and theories developed in libraries and information science become more accessible and hopefully also more relevant to researchers in cognate disciplines.

0.03893893 = product of:
  0.07787786 = sum of:
    0.07787786 = product of:
      0.15575571 = sum of:
        0.15575571 = weight(_text_:styles in 3640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15575571 = score(doc=3640,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3416753 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.8766055 = idf(docFreq=123, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049686626 = queryNorm
            0.45585886 = fieldWeight in 3640, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.8766055 = idf(docFreq=123, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3640)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

This study aims to identify different styles of personal digital information categorization based on the mindscape of the categorizers. To collect data, a questionnaire, a diary study, and 2 semistructured interviews were conducted with each of 18 participants. Then a content analysis was used to analyze the data. Based on the analysis of the data, this study identified 3 different types of categorizers: (i) rigid categorizers, (ii) fuzzy categorizers, and (iii) flexible categorizers. This study provides a unique way to understand personal information categorization by showing how it reflects the mindscapes of the categorizers. In particular, this study explains why people organize their personal information differently and have different tendencies in developing and maintaining their organizational structures. The findings provide insights on different ways of categorizing personal information and deepen our knowledge of categorization, personal information management, and information behavior. In practice, understanding different types of personal digital information categorization can make contributions to the development of systems, tools, and applications that support effective personal digital information categorization.

0.032881472 = product of:
  0.065762945 = sum of:
    0.065762945 = product of:
      0.19728883 = sum of:
        0.19728883 = weight(_text_:3a in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19728883 = score(doc=4997,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.42124376 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049686626 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

PhD Dissertation at International Doctorate School in Information and Communication Technology. Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Fcore.ac.uk%2Fdownload%2Fpdf%2F150083013.pdf&usg=AOvVaw2n-qisNagpyT0lli_6QbAQ.

0.032881472 = product of:
  0.065762945 = sum of:
    0.065762945 = product of:
      0.19728883 = sum of:
        0.19728883 = weight(_text_:3a in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19728883 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.42124376 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049686626 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Footnote

Vgl. unter: https://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwizweHljdbcAhVS16QKHXcFD9QQFjABegQICRAB&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.researchgate.net%2Fpublication%2F271200105_Die_Autonomie_des_Menschen_und_der_Maschine_-_gegenwartige_Definitionen_von_Autonomie_zwischen_philosophischem_Hintergrund_und_technologischer_Umsetzbarkeit_Redigierte_Version_der_Magisterarbeit_Karls&usg=AOvVaw06orrdJmFF2xbCCp_hL26q.

0.032881472 = product of:
  0.065762945 = sum of:
    0.065762945 = product of:
      0.19728883 = sum of:
        0.19728883 = weight(_text_:3a in 855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19728883 = score(doc=855,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.42124376 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049686626 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 855, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=855)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

Vgl. auch: New automatic interpreter for complex UDC numbers. Unter: <https%3A%2F%2Fudcc.org%2Ffiles%2FAttilaPiros_EC_36-37_2014-2015.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3kc9CwDDCWP7aArpfjrs5b>