Search (431 results, page 1 of 22)

  • × theme_ss:"Formalerschließung"
  1. Puhlmann, H.; Nohr, H.: Erschließung und Abfrage formaler Kriterien im Online-Kontext (1991) 0.06
    0.056948185 = product of:
      0.39863726 = sum of:
        0.39863726 = weight(_text_:abfrage in 2040) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.39863726 = score(doc=2040,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.28580084 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.890225 = idf(docFreq=44, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03622214 = queryNorm
            1.3948078 = fieldWeight in 2040, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.890225 = idf(docFreq=44, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2040)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
  2. Troxler, W.: Einige Erfahrungen aus dem Informationsverbund Deutschsschweiz (IDS) (2002) 0.03
    0.032874495 = product of:
      0.23012145 = sum of:
        0.23012145 = weight(_text_:mehrsprachigkeit in 1093) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.23012145 = score(doc=1093,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3070917 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03622214 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 1093, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1093)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    Die Katalogsituation in der Schweiz ist in verschiedenen Bereichen uneinheitlicher als in Deutschland. Dies liegt vor allem an der Mehrsprachigkeit, am Fehlen von schweizerischen Normdateien und am Fehlen von einheitlichen Sacherschließungssystemen. Das Folgende beschränkt sich deshalb auf die Situation im Informationsverbund Deutschschweiz (IDS).
  3. Albrecht, R.; Körfer, N.: Online-Ressourcen in HeBIS : Neue Medien - neue Herausforderungen (2002) 0.01
    0.011300487 = product of:
      0.039551705 = sum of:
        0.003969876 = product of:
          0.01984938 = sum of:
            0.01984938 = weight(_text_:system in 1094) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.01984938 = score(doc=1094,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11408355 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.17398985 = fieldWeight in 1094, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1094)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
        0.03558183 = product of:
          0.07116366 = sum of:
            0.07116366 = weight(_text_:zugriff in 1094) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07116366 = score(doc=1094,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2160124 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.963546 = idf(docFreq=308, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.32944247 = fieldWeight in 1094, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.963546 = idf(docFreq=308, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1094)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    Seit der Gründung des HeBIS-Konsortiums (http://www.hebis.de/hebis-konsortium/) und seiner Institutionalisierung sowie der Bereitstellung von zentralen Erwerbungsmitteln durch das Land Hessen wurde für die hessischen Hochschul- und Fachhochschulbibliotheken eine beträchtliche Anzahl von Zeitschriftenpaketen und Datenbanken erworben. Die ebenfalls dem Hessischen BibliothekslnformationsSystem (HeBIS) angeschlossene UB Mainz profitiert in ähnlicher Weise von Aktivitäten in Rheinland-Pfalz. So erfreulich die zunehmende konsortiale Erwerbung von Online-Ressourcen mit Volltextzugriff auch ist - sie stellte die HeBIS-Bibliotheken vor folgende Probleme, für die dringend Lösungen eingefordert wurden: (1) Wer erstellt die Titelaufnahme? Innerhalb des HeBIS-Konsortiums wurden mittlerweile ca. 3500 Zeitschriften mit Volltextzugriff, ca. 400 Zeitschriften mit Zugriff auf Abstracts und Inhaltsverzeichnisse und ca. 100 Datenbanken erworben. Um den Arbeitsaufwand für die an den Konsortialverträgen beteiligten Bibliotheken möglichst gering zu halten, wurde eine zentrale Titelerfassung für die Verbunddatenbank sowie für die überregionale Zeitschriftendatenbank gefordert. Diese erfolgt nach Meldung neuer Verträge durch das HeBIS-Konsortium in der HeBIS-Verbundzentrale, die diese Aufgabe neu übernommen hat, ohne dafür jedoch zusätzliche Personalressourcen zu erhalten. (2) Wer erfasst die Lokaldaten? HeBIS betreibt eine Pica-basierte Verbunddatenbank. Im Pica-System werden die lokalen Bibliotheks-OPACs durch einen speziellen Mechanismus aus der zentralen Datenbank heraus automatisch beliefert. Ausgelöst wird dieser Mechanismus durch die Erstellung eines Lokaldatensatzes an einem Titeldatensatz. Jede Bibliothek muss ihre Lokaldaten normalerweise individuell erfassen, was einen hohen personellen Aufwand bedeutet.
  4. Nicholson, D.; Steele, M.: CATRIONA: a distributed, locally-oriented. Z39.50 OPAC-based approach to cataloguing the Internet (1996) 0.01
    0.010479822 = product of:
      0.036679376 = sum of:
        0.021956576 = product of:
          0.054891437 = sum of:
            0.03107218 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 6734) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03107218 = score(doc=6734,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.2835858 = fieldWeight in 6734, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6734)
            0.023819257 = weight(_text_:system in 6734) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023819257 = score(doc=6734,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11408355 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.20878783 = fieldWeight in 6734, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6734)
          0.4 = coord(2/5)
        0.0147228 = product of:
          0.0294456 = sum of:
            0.0294456 = weight(_text_:22 in 6734) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0294456 = score(doc=6734,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12684377 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 6734, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6734)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    Describes the origins of the CATaloguing and Retrieval of Information Over Network Applications (CATRIONA) Study in the BUBL Subject Tree service and nots its aims: to investigate the requirements for developing procedures and applications for cataloguing and retrieval of networked resources (particularly via the Internet); and to explore the feasibility of a collaborative project to develop and integrate them with existing library systems. The project established that a distributed catalogue of networked resources integrated with standard Z39.50 library system OPAC interfaces with information on hard copy resources is already a practical proposition at a basic level. Notes that at least one Z30.50 OPAC client can searcg remote Z39.50 OPACs, retrieve USMARC records with URLs in MARC field 856
    Series
    Cataloging and classification quarterly; vol.22, nos.3/4
  5. RAK-NBM : Interpretationshilfe zu NBM 3b,3 (2000) 0.01
    0.00793188 = product of:
      0.055523157 = sum of:
        0.055523157 = product of:
          0.111046314 = sum of:
            0.111046314 = weight(_text_:22 in 4362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.111046314 = score(doc=4362,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.12684377 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.8754574 = fieldWeight in 4362, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4362)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2000 19:22:27
  6. Ballard, T.; Grimaldi, A.: Improve OPAC searching by reducing tagging errors in MARC records (1997) 0.01
    0.007423487 = product of:
      0.025982203 = sum of:
        0.006351802 = product of:
          0.03175901 = sum of:
            0.03175901 = weight(_text_:system in 695) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03175901 = score(doc=695,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11408355 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.27838376 = fieldWeight in 695, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=695)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
        0.0196304 = product of:
          0.0392608 = sum of:
            0.0392608 = weight(_text_:22 in 695) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0392608 = score(doc=695,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12684377 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 695, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=695)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    One of the most common errors in cataloguing library materials involves miscoding of the nonfiling indicator of title fields. Notes the extent of the problem and its negative effect on searching in the library's online catalogue and surveys how librarians have approached solutions to the problems. Describes how the major library automation system address this problem
    Date
    6. 3.1997 16:22:15
  7. Chang, H.-Y.: Cataloguing electronic resources (1997) 0.01
    0.007423487 = product of:
      0.025982203 = sum of:
        0.006351802 = product of:
          0.03175901 = sum of:
            0.03175901 = weight(_text_:system in 1770) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03175901 = score(doc=1770,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11408355 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.27838376 = fieldWeight in 1770, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1770)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
        0.0196304 = product of:
          0.0392608 = sum of:
            0.0392608 = weight(_text_:22 in 1770) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0392608 = score(doc=1770,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12684377 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1770, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1770)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    Considers issues surrounding cataloguing electronic resources on the MELVYL online system at the University of California, USA. Considers implications of the differences between online and paper versions of serials, difficulties in providing precises information on holdings of full text articles, cataloguing rules changes that are need to integrate MARC formats, adding URLs as a subfield, archiving electronic journals and restricting access to electronic materials
    Source
    DLA bulletin. 17(1997) no.1, S.22-24
  8. Coyle, K.: Future considerations : the functional library systems record (2004) 0.01
    0.007423487 = product of:
      0.025982203 = sum of:
        0.006351802 = product of:
          0.03175901 = sum of:
            0.03175901 = weight(_text_:system in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03175901 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11408355 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.27838376 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
        0.0196304 = product of:
          0.0392608 = sum of:
            0.0392608 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0392608 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12684377 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    The paper performs a thought experiment on the concept of a record based on the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records and library system functions, and concludes that if we want to develop a functional bibliographic record we need to do it within the context of a flexible, functional library systems record structure. The article suggests a new way to look at the library systems record that would allow libraries to move forward in terms of technology but also in terms of serving library users.
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.166-174
  9. Cochenour, D.: Linking remote users and information : cataloguing Internet publications (1994) 0.01
    0.007282694 = product of:
      0.025489427 = sum of:
        0.0058590267 = product of:
          0.029295133 = sum of:
            0.029295133 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2170) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029295133 = score(doc=2170,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 2170, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2170)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
        0.0196304 = product of:
          0.0392608 = sum of:
            0.0392608 = weight(_text_:22 in 2170) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0392608 = score(doc=2170,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12684377 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2170, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2170)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    Libraries can add value to Internet resources by adding them to the library's catalogue in a manner consistent with the other resources held within the collection. Reports on OCLC studies into cataloguing Internet resources and accessing electronic periodicals. Existing retrieval methods on the Internet are limited because of shallow directory structures and idiosyncratic naming conventions. Catalogue entries for electronic resources need to provide a complete description of the access methodology if they are to satisfactorily connect remote users without the immediate possibility of backup from reference staff
    Date
    17.10.1995 18:22:54
  10. Harmon, J.C.: ¬The death of quality cataloging : does it make a difference for library users? (1996) 0.01
    0.007282694 = product of:
      0.025489427 = sum of:
        0.0058590267 = product of:
          0.029295133 = sum of:
            0.029295133 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 6435) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029295133 = score(doc=6435,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 6435, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6435)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
        0.0196304 = product of:
          0.0392608 = sum of:
            0.0392608 = weight(_text_:22 in 6435) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0392608 = score(doc=6435,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12684377 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6435, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6435)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    Defends the role of quality cataloguing. It is only with adequate records that users will be able to find the information they require. It is a prerequisite for efficient machine retrieval and integrated services. Quality MARC records and the intellectual structure of cataloguing are essential is standards of service are to be maintained
    Source
    Journal of academic librarianship. 22(1996) no.4, S.306-307
  11. Lee, E.: Cataloguing (and reference) at the crossroads (1996) 0.01
    0.007282694 = product of:
      0.025489427 = sum of:
        0.0058590267 = product of:
          0.029295133 = sum of:
            0.029295133 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 499) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029295133 = score(doc=499,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 499, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=499)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
        0.0196304 = product of:
          0.0392608 = sum of:
            0.0392608 = weight(_text_:22 in 499) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0392608 = score(doc=499,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12684377 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 499, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=499)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    Alerts librarians to directions in research in artificial intelligence relevant to information retrieval which will change current technology and user expectations and consequently the requirements for data provision and access at the base level. Predicts a reevaluation of priorities for using the expertise of cataloguers (and reference librarians) and of cataloguing methodologies. Debates the future of cataloguing, arguing for the need to monitor developments in adjacent research areas and to plan with these in mind
    Source
    Cataloguing Australia. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.68-75
  12. Striedieck, S.: Online catalog maintenance : the OOPS command in LIAS (1985) 0.01
    0.0071533015 = product of:
      0.025036555 = sum of:
        0.007859954 = product of:
          0.039299767 = sum of:
            0.039299767 = weight(_text_:system in 366) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.039299767 = score(doc=366,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.11408355 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.34448233 = fieldWeight in 366, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=366)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
        0.0171766 = product of:
          0.0343532 = sum of:
            0.0343532 = weight(_text_:22 in 366) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0343532 = score(doc=366,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12684377 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 366, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=366)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    LIAS, the Pennsylvania State University's (Penn State) integrated interactive online system, provides for messaging by the user to inform library staff of errors found in bibliographic records. The message is sent by use of the OOPS command, and results in a printout which is used by processing staff for online catalog maintenance. This article describes LIAS, the use of the OOPS command, the processing of the resulting OOPS reports, an assessment of the effect of its use, and some speculation on the expansion of the LIAS message system for use in catalog maintenance.
    Date
    7. 1.2007 13:22:30
  13. Botero, C.; Thorburn, C.; Williams, N.: Series in an online integrated system : an option beyond the MARC authority record (1990) 0.01
    0.0071533015 = product of:
      0.025036555 = sum of:
        0.007859954 = product of:
          0.039299767 = sum of:
            0.039299767 = weight(_text_:system in 482) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.039299767 = score(doc=482,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.11408355 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.34448233 = fieldWeight in 482, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=482)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
        0.0171766 = product of:
          0.0343532 = sum of:
            0.0343532 = weight(_text_:22 in 482) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0343532 = score(doc=482,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12684377 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 482, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=482)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    The authors describe the creation of online series authority records on the University of Florida Libraries' NOTIS-based LUIS system. It is an original method that uses serial bibliographic records as a basis for series authority records. We hope that our explanation of this pioneering method will be useful in varying degrees to other libraries attempting to convert their series authorities to an online environment. We also hope that this paper will prompt discussion among catalogers about series authorities in the online environment.
    Date
    8. 1.2007 12:29:22
  14. Gömpel, R.; Altenhöner, R.; Kunz, M.; Oehlschläger, S.; Werner, C.: Weltkongress Bibliothek und Information, 70. IFLA-Generalkonferenz in Buenos Aires : Aus den Veranstaltungen der Division IV Bibliographic Control, der Core Activities ICABS und UNIMARC sowie der Information Technology Section (2004) 0.01
    0.0071530645 = product of:
      0.050071448 = sum of:
        0.050071448 = sum of:
          0.040256247 = weight(_text_:zugriff in 2874) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.040256247 = score(doc=2874,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.2160124 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.963546 = idf(docFreq=308, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03622214 = queryNorm
              0.1863608 = fieldWeight in 2874, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                5.963546 = idf(docFreq=308, maxDocs=44218)
                0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=2874)
          0.0098152 = weight(_text_:22 in 2874) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0098152 = score(doc=2874,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.12684377 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03622214 = queryNorm
              0.07738023 = fieldWeight in 2874, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=2874)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    "Libraries: Tools for Education and Development" war das Motto der 70. IFLA-Generalkonferenz, dem Weltkongress Bibliothek und Information, der vom 22.-27. August 2004 in Buenos Aires, Argentinien, und damit erstmals in Lateinamerika stattfand. Rund 3.000 Teilnehmerinnen und Teilnehmer, davon ein Drittel aus spanischsprachigen Ländern, allein 600 aus Argentinien, besuchten die von der IFLA und dem nationalen Organisationskomitee gut organisierte Tagung mit mehr als 200 Sitzungen und Veranstaltungen. Aus Deutschland waren laut Teilnehmerverzeichnis leider nur 45 Kolleginnen und Kollegen angereist, womit ihre Zahl wieder auf das Niveau von Boston gesunken ist. Erfreulicherweise gab es nunmehr bereits im dritten Jahr eine deutschsprachige Ausgabe des IFLA-Express. Auch in diesem Jahr soll hier über die Veranstaltungen der Division IV Bibliographic Control berichtet werden. Die Arbeit der Division mit ihren Sektionen Bibliography, Cataloguing, Classification and Indexing sowie der neuen Sektion Knowledge Management bildet einen der Schwerpunkte der IFLA-Arbeit, die dabei erzielten konkreten Ergebnisse und Empfehlungen haben maßgeblichen Einfluss auf die tägliche Arbeit der Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare. Erstmals wird auch ausführlich über die Arbeit der Core Activities ICABS und UNIMARC und der Information Technology Section berichtet.
    Content
    Cataloguing Section (Sektion Katalogisierung) Der Schwerpunkt der Arbeit dieser Sektion liegt auf der Erarbeitung bzw. internationalen Harmonisierung von Strukturen, Regeln und Arbeitsverfahren mit dem Ziel, die internationale Kooperation im Katalogisierungsbereich zu verbessern. In Anbetracht des laufenden Evaluierungsprozesses wurde der Strategieplan der Sektion zum jetzigen Zeitpunkt nur dort aktualisiert, wo es unbedingt erforderlich war. Neue Ziele wurden nicht aufgenommen. Oberste Priorität bei den strategischen Zielen behielt die Entwicklung internationaler Katalogisierungsstandards für die bibliographische Beschreibung und den Zugriff. In ihrer zentralen Bedeutung bestätigt wurden auch die "Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records" (FRBR). Darüber hinaus gehört auch in Zukunft die Weiterentwicklung und Revision der ISBDs zu den zentralen Anliegen der Arbeit der Sektion Katalogisierung. Ein weiteres vorrangiges Ziel bleibt die Erarbeitung von Standards, Regeln und Informationslisten, um den Zugang zu bibliographischen Daten in allen Sprachen zu ermöglichen. Hierzu zählen u. a.: - die vollständige Veröffentlichung der Anonymous Classics: Der Teil für europäische Literatur ist inzwischen veröffentlicht'. Für die Erarbeitung weiterer Teile (Lateinamerika, Afrika und Asien) soll das Verfahren gestrafft und ein Zeitplan erstellt werden. - die Beobachtung der Aktivitäten zu Unicode und die Information der Sektionsmitglieder darüber zur Förderung des mehrsprachigen Zugangs zu bibliographischer Information - die Entwicklung eines web-basierten multilingualen Wörterbuchs für Katalogisierungsbegriffe - die Entwicklung und der Test von (Daten-)Modellen für eine virtuelle internationale Normdatei - die Überarbeitung der "IFLA Names of persons". Das Open Programme der Sektion stand in diesem Jahr unter dem Motto "Developments in Cataloguing Guidelines" und wurde von Barbara Tillett, Lynne Howarth und Carol van Nuys bestritten. Lynne Howarth ging in ihrem Vortrag "Enabling metadata: creating a core record for resource discovery" auf die Reaktionen im weltweiten Stellungnahmeverfahren auf die Veröffentlichung des Papiers "Guidance an the Structure, Content and Application of Metadata Records for digital resources and collections" der Working Group an the Use of Metadata Schemes ein. Carol van Nuys stellte das norwegische "Paradigma Project and its quest for metadata solutions and services" vor.
    Classification and Indexing Section (Sektion Klassifikation und Indexierung) Die Working Group an Guidelines for Multilingual Thesauri hat ihre Arbeit abgeschlossen, die Richtlinien werden Ende 2004 im IFLAnet zur Verfügung stehen. Die 2003 ins Leben gerufene Arbeitsgruppe zu Mindeststandards der Inhaltserschließung in Nationalbibliographien hat sich in Absprache mit den Mitgliedern des Standing Committee auf den Namen "Guidelines for minimal requirements for subject access by national bibliographic agencies" verständigt. Als Grundlage der zukünftigen Arbeit soll der "Survey an Subject Heading Languages Used in National Libraries and Bibliographies" von Magda HeinerFreiling dienen. Davon ausgehend soll eruiert werden, welche Arten von Medienwerken mit welchen Instrumentarien und in welcher Tiefe erschlossen werden. Eine weitere Arbeitsgruppe der Sektion befasst sich mit dem sachlichen Zugriff auf Netzpublikationen (Working Group an Subject Access to Web Resources). Die Veranstaltung "Implementation and adaption of global tools for subject access to local needs" fand regen Zuspruch. Drei Vortragende zeigten auf, wie in ihrem Sprachgebiet die Subject Headings der Library of Congress (LoC) übernommen werden (Development of a Spanish subject heading list und Subject indexing in Sweden) bzw. wie sich die Zusammenarbeit mit der LoC gestalten lässt, um den besonderen terminologischen Bedürfnissen eines Sprach- und Kulturraums außerhalb der USA Rechnung zu tragen (The SACO Program in Latin America). Aus deutscher Sicht verdiente der Vortrag "Subject indexing between international standards and local context - the Italian case" besondere Beachtung. Die Entwicklung eines Regelwerks zur verbalen Sacherschließung und die Erarbeitung einer italienischen Schlagwortnormdatei folgen nämlich erklärtermaßen der deutschen Vorgehensweise mit RSWK und SWD.
  15. Olson, C.: Cataloging Southeast Asian language materials : the case of the Thai language (1996) 0.01
    0.0064955507 = product of:
      0.022734426 = sum of:
        0.0055578267 = product of:
          0.027789133 = sum of:
            0.027789133 = weight(_text_:system in 5112) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027789133 = score(doc=5112,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11408355 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.2435858 = fieldWeight in 5112, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5112)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
        0.0171766 = product of:
          0.0343532 = sum of:
            0.0343532 = weight(_text_:22 in 5112) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0343532 = score(doc=5112,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12684377 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5112, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5112)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    Cataloging and accessing non-roman languages, such as the languages in the JACKPHY group, have been better served because of the inclusion of vernacular languages in their bibliographic records. However, Southeast Asian languages such as Thai, Lao or even Burmese present other problems for catalogers because only romanized versions of these languages are present in current bibliographic records. The problems in cataloging and accessing the materials in these languages occur not only because of the romanization system but also due to the nature of the languages themselves. This paper presents a number of problems related to the cataloging of Thai language materials.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) no.2, S.10-28
  16. Khurshid, Z.: ¬The impact of information technology an job requirements and qualifications for catalogers (2003) 0.01
    0.0064955507 = product of:
      0.022734426 = sum of:
        0.0055578267 = product of:
          0.027789133 = sum of:
            0.027789133 = weight(_text_:system in 2323) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027789133 = score(doc=2323,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11408355 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.2435858 = fieldWeight in 2323, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2323)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
        0.0171766 = product of:
          0.0343532 = sum of:
            0.0343532 = weight(_text_:22 in 2323) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0343532 = score(doc=2323,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12684377 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2323, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2323)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    Information technology (IT) encompassing an integrated library system, computer hardware and software, CDROM, Internet, and other domains, including MARC 21 formats, CORC, and metadata standards (Dublin Core, TEI, XML, RDF) has produced far-reaching changes in the job functions of catalogers. Libraries are now coming up with a new set of recruiting requirements for these positions. This paper aims to review job advertisements published in American Libraries (AL) and College and Research Libraries News (C&RL NEWS) to assess the impact of the use of IT in libraries an job requirements and qualifications for catalogers.
    Source
    Information technology and libraries. 22(2003) no. March, S.18-21
  17. Haynes, K.J.M.; Saye, J.D.; Kaid, L.L.: Cataloging collection-level records for archival video and audio recordings (1993) 0.01
    0.0064955507 = product of:
      0.022734426 = sum of:
        0.0055578267 = product of:
          0.027789133 = sum of:
            0.027789133 = weight(_text_:system in 584) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027789133 = score(doc=584,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11408355 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.2435858 = fieldWeight in 584, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=584)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
        0.0171766 = product of:
          0.0343532 = sum of:
            0.0343532 = weight(_text_:22 in 584) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0343532 = score(doc=584,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12684377 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 584, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=584)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    Describes a project to create a bibliographic control system for archival quality video and audio recordings of political commercials. The project objectives were: to design a local computer searchable database; prepare item level records for the local database; and prepare collection level records for the OCLC Online Union Catalog. The collection level records are intended to alert scholars, researchers, and other potential users to the existence of the archive and to direct them to it for more powerful item level searching in the local database. Some of the cataloguing problems discussed are: choice of cataloguing tools and MARC formats; organization of the collections around the political candidate, and name authority
    Date
    12. 1.2007 14:43:22
  18. Mandel, C.A.; Wolven, R.: Intellectual access to digital documents : joining proven principles with new technologies (1996) 0.01
    0.0063723573 = product of:
      0.02230325 = sum of:
        0.0051266486 = product of:
          0.025633242 = sum of:
            0.025633242 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 6740) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025633242 = score(doc=6740,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 6740, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6740)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
        0.0171766 = product of:
          0.0343532 = sum of:
            0.0343532 = weight(_text_:22 in 6740) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0343532 = score(doc=6740,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12684377 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6740, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6740)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    Considers the relevance of Cutter's principles of bibliographic access to Internet accessible digital materials and explores new methods for applying these principles in the context of new information technologies. Examines the value for retrieval of collecting authors' names, identifying authors' roles, collocating works and versions, and providing subject access through classification and controlled vocabularies for digital resources available through the WWW. Identifies emerging technologies and techniques that may be used in lieu of or as a supplement to traditional cataloguing to achieve these functions in organizing access to Internet resources
    Series
    Cataloging and classification quarterly; vol.22, nos.3/4
  19. Beall, J.; Kafadar, K.: ¬The effectiveness of copy cotaloging at eliminating typographical errors in shared bibliographic records (2004) 0.01
    0.0063723573 = product of:
      0.02230325 = sum of:
        0.0051266486 = product of:
          0.025633242 = sum of:
            0.025633242 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4849) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025633242 = score(doc=4849,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 4849, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4849)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
        0.0171766 = product of:
          0.0343532 = sum of:
            0.0343532 = weight(_text_:22 in 4849) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0343532 = score(doc=4849,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12684377 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4849, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4849)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    Typographical errors in bibliographic records can cause retrieval problems in online catalogs. This study examined one hundred typographical errors in records in the OCLC WorldCat database. The local catalogs of five libraries holding the items described by the bibliographic records with typographical errors were searched to determine whether each library had corrected the errors. The study found that only 35.8 percent of the errors had been corrected. Knowledge of copy cataloging error rates can help underscore the importance of quality data in bibliographic utilities and, further, can serve as an indication to libraries whether they need to pay more attention to correcting types in the copy cataloging process.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  20. Brunt, R.: Old rules for a new game : Cutter revisited (1998) 0.01
    0.0063723573 = product of:
      0.02230325 = sum of:
        0.0051266486 = product of:
          0.025633242 = sum of:
            0.025633242 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 771) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025633242 = score(doc=771,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 771, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=771)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
        0.0171766 = product of:
          0.0343532 = sum of:
            0.0343532 = weight(_text_:22 in 771) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0343532 = score(doc=771,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12684377 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 771, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=771)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    It is contended that while there are considerable numbers of people interested in the application of information retrieval (IR) software on their home computers in their professional, working and recreational activities, they are not very well served in using it to best advantage. Describes the writer's attempts to transfer some of the recorded good practice of the first information managers to contemporary problems. Data input standards devoted to library organisation may be developed to establish a set of principles to encourage the consistent organisation of the entire range of objects which might be represented in databases. Specific areas of difficulty are examined.
    Date
    24. 1.2007 19:38:22

Years

Languages

Types

  • a 388
  • m 28
  • b 15
  • s 12
  • el 11
  • r 3
  • x 3
  • ? 1
  • n 1
  • More… Less…

Subjects