-
Mohan, K.C.: Boolean and nearest neighbour text searching in a multi-strategy retrieval system (1996)
0.01
0.0059145307 = product of:
0.041401714 = sum of:
0.041401714 = product of:
0.103504285 = sum of:
0.058590267 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 7255) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.058590267 = score(doc=7255,freq=8.0), product of:
0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.5347345 = fieldWeight in 7255, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7255)
0.044914022 = weight(_text_:system in 7255) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044914022 = score(doc=7255,freq=4.0), product of:
0.11408355 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.3936941 = fieldWeight in 7255, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7255)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- Information retrieval systems based on the Boolean model have been popular for some time. A major challenge to this model has come from the development of approaches based on the vector processing model. Both search strategies are explained and evaluated. Describes an experimental study in an opertational environment to compare the retrieval effectiveness of Boolean and nearest neighbour searching in a multi-strategy retrieval system based on query characteristic variables. Considers the significance of the results of the study
-
Shah, G.A.; Desai, A.T.; Nagarkar, S.A.: Search strategies : their importance in IR process (1992)
0.00
0.0043610106 = product of:
0.030527074 = sum of:
0.030527074 = product of:
0.07631768 = sum of:
0.03661892 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3806) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03661892 = score(doc=3806,freq=2.0), product of:
0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.33420905 = fieldWeight in 3806, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3806)
0.03969876 = weight(_text_:system in 3806) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03969876 = score(doc=3806,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11408355 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.3479797 = fieldWeight in 3806, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3806)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- Discusses how users' questions should be analysed and appropriate search strategies should be formulated with a view to enhancing the capabilities of a system in retrieval of the most relevant information with a high degree of precision
-
Kim, S.Y.: Search strategy, search tactics, moves (1995)
0.00
0.0043610106 = product of:
0.030527074 = sum of:
0.030527074 = product of:
0.07631768 = sum of:
0.03661892 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03661892 = score(doc=622,freq=2.0), product of:
0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.33420905 = fieldWeight in 622, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=622)
0.03969876 = weight(_text_:system in 622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03969876 = score(doc=622,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11408355 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.3479797 = fieldWeight in 622, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=622)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- The terms search strategy, search tactics, and moves are used to refer to interaction between an information retrieval system and the user. Examines papers using search strategy, search tactics, moves and analyzes the meaning of these terms. Suggests the need to use strategy and moves in information seeking studies
-
Ennis, M.; Sutcliffe, A.G.; Watkinson, S.J.: Towards a predictive model of information seeking : empirical studies of end-user-searching (1999)
0.00
0.004087601 = product of:
0.014306603 = sum of:
0.0044914023 = product of:
0.022457011 = sum of:
0.022457011 = weight(_text_:system in 296) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022457011 = score(doc=296,freq=4.0), product of:
0.11408355 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.19684705 = fieldWeight in 296, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=296)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.0098152 = product of:
0.0196304 = sum of:
0.0196304 = weight(_text_:22 in 296) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0196304 = score(doc=296,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12684377 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 296, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=296)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- Previous empirical studies of searcher behaviour have drawn attention to a wide variety of factors that affect performance; for instance, the display of retrieved results can alter search strategies (Allen 1991, 1994), the information need type influences search behaviour, (Elkerton et al 1984, Marchionini 1995); while the task complexity, reflected in the information need can affect user's search behaviour (Large et al 1994). Furthermore, information source selection (Bassilli 1977), and the user's model of the system and domain impact on the search process (Michel 1994); while motivation (Solomon 1993, Jacobsen et al 1992) and the importance of the information need (Wendt 1969) also influence search duration and the effort a user will employ. Rouse and Rouse (1984) in a review of empirical studies, summarise a wide variety of variables that can effect searching behaviour, including payoff, costs of searching, resource available, amount of information sought, characteristics of the data and conflicts between documents. It appears that user behaviour is inconsistent in the search strategies adopted even for the same search need and system (Davidson 1977, Iivonen 1995). Theories of searcher behaviour have been proposed that provide explanations of aspects of end-user behaviour, such as the evolution of the user's information need and the problems of articulating a query, [Bates (1979, 1989), Markey and Atherton 1978], effective search strategies in browsing and goal directed searches [Marchionini 1995, Belkin (1987, 1993)], the linguistic problem of matching search terms with indexing terms or content of target documents through an expert intermediary (Ingwersen 1982) or cognitive aspects of IR (Kulthau 1984, Ingwersen 1996).
- Date
- 22. 3.2002 9:54:13
-
Pejtersen, A.M.: ¬A new approach to design of document retrieval and indexing systems for OPAC users (1993)
0.00
0.004080667 = product of:
0.028564667 = sum of:
0.028564667 = product of:
0.07141167 = sum of:
0.031712912 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1300) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031712912 = score(doc=1300,freq=6.0), product of:
0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.28943354 = fieldWeight in 1300, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1300)
0.03969876 = weight(_text_:system in 1300) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03969876 = score(doc=1300,freq=8.0), product of:
0.11408355 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.3479797 = fieldWeight in 1300, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1300)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- This paper describes a new OPAC system called The Book House and discusses its relevance as a solution to current OPAC developments. The Book House is an interactive, multimedia, online public access catalogue system designed to support casual and/or novice end-users in information retrieval. It runs on a Macintosh and is available on CD-ROM and disks in English and Danish (it can be purchased from Risø for $100). It comprises an interface and module for classifying and indexing fact and fiction books in the database called Book House Write. It uses icons, text and animation in the display interface in order to enhance the utility of the system for the general public. Both words and pictures can be used for searching, which makes the system suitable for all age groups. It plays on users' previous experiencees with computer games to support learning by doing something in an enjoyable way. A prerequisite for the design of The Book House was a new approach to cognitive analysis of retrieval in libraries. Based on the success of this approach, it is claimed that OPAC systems will only be really useful and widespread (1) when their domain and task characteristics allow supplementary information to be added to existing descriptions of book content in online card catalogues in order to match end-users' intentions and needs, and (2) when the user interface and routes to the databases are configured as an integrated and uniform set of displays which match the search strategies of users, as well as their mental capabilities and limitations
-
Toms, E.G.: What motivates the browser? (1999)
0.00
0.0037117435 = product of:
0.0129911015 = sum of:
0.003175901 = product of:
0.015879504 = sum of:
0.015879504 = weight(_text_:system in 292) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015879504 = score(doc=292,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11408355 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.13919188 = fieldWeight in 292, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=292)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.0098152 = product of:
0.0196304 = sum of:
0.0196304 = weight(_text_:22 in 292) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0196304 = score(doc=292,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12684377 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 292, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=292)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- Browsing is considered to be unstructured and human-driven, although not a cognitively intensive process. It is conducted using systems that facilitate considerable user-system interactivity. Cued by the content, people immerse themselves in a topic of interest and meander from topic to topic while concurrently recognising interesting and informative information en route. They seem to seek and gather information in a purposeless, illogical and indiscriminate manner. Typical examples of these ostensibly random acts are scanning a non-fiction book, examining the morning newspaper, perusing the contents of a business report and scavenging the World Wide Web. Often the result is the acquisition of new information, the rejection or confirmation of an idea, or the genesis of new, perhaps not-wholly-formed thoughts about a topic. Noteworthy about this approach is that people explore information without having consciously structured queries or explicit goals. This form of passive information interaction behaviour is defined as acquiring and gathering information while scanning an information space without a specific goal in mind (Waterworth & Chignell, 1991; Toms, 1997), and for the purposes of this study, is called browsing. Traditionally, browsing is thought of in two ways: as a physical process - the action taken when one scans a list, a document, or a set of linked information nodes (e.g., Fox & Palay, 1979; Thompson & Croft, 1989; Ellis, 1989), and as a conceptual process, information seeking when the goal is ill-defined (e.g., Cove & Walsh, 1987). Browsing is also combined with searching in an integrated information-seeking process for retrieving information (e.g., Ellis, 1989; Belkin, Marchetti & Cool, 1993; Marchionini, 1995; Chang, 1995). Each of these cases focuses primarily on seeking information when the objective ranges from fuzzy to explicit.
- Date
- 22. 3.2002 9:44:47
-
Vakkari, P.: Task complexity, information types, search strategies and relevance : integrating studies on information retrieval and seeking (1999)
0.00
0.002613878 = product of:
0.018297145 = sum of:
0.018297145 = product of:
0.045742862 = sum of:
0.025893483 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 299) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025893483 = score(doc=299,freq=4.0), product of:
0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.23632148 = fieldWeight in 299, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=299)
0.01984938 = weight(_text_:system in 299) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01984938 = score(doc=299,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11408355 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.17398985 = fieldWeight in 299, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=299)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- Research in information science aims to comprehend the facilitation of access to information for supporting purposeful action. The major themes to be addressed have been how information is organized for access, how it is retrieved from storage, and how it is sought out and used for various purposes. Two central research areas in the field are information retrieval (IR) and information seeking (IS) (Vakkari & Rochester, 1998). Although intuitively the fields seem to be overlapping, their research communities have been active in their own enclosures. Few researchers have visited the neighboring side. However, there are researchers (Bates, 1989; Belkin & Vickery, 1986; Belkin, 1993; Ellis, 1989; Ingwersen, 1992, 1996; Järvelin 1987; Kuhlthau, 1993; Marchionini, 1995; Saracevic & Kantor, 1988) who have stressed the need to connect results from both research traditions. IR can be seen as a part of a broader process of information seeking. By IS is understood a process of searching, obtaining and using information for a purpose (e.g., form a solution for a task) when a person does not have sufficient prior knowledge. By 1R is understood the use of an information system for obtaining relevant information for a purpose (e.g., a task). This implies that information systems are a specific means among other sources and channels for obtaining information.
-
Hsieh-Yee, I.: Search tactics of Web users in searching for texts, graphics, known items and subjects : a search simulation study (1998)
0.00
0.0021032572 = product of:
0.0147228 = sum of:
0.0147228 = product of:
0.0294456 = sum of:
0.0294456 = weight(_text_:22 in 2404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0294456 = score(doc=2404,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12684377 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2404, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2404)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Date
- 25.12.1998 19:22:31
-
Limberg, L.: Three conceptions of information seeking and use (1999)
0.00
0.0021032572 = product of:
0.0147228 = sum of:
0.0147228 = product of:
0.0294456 = sum of:
0.0294456 = weight(_text_:22 in 281) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0294456 = score(doc=281,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12684377 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 281, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=281)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Date
- 22. 3.2002 9:53:10
-
Byström, K.: Information seekers in context : an analysis of the 'doer' in INSU studies (1999)
0.00
0.0017527144 = product of:
0.0122690005 = sum of:
0.0122690005 = product of:
0.024538001 = sum of:
0.024538001 = weight(_text_:22 in 297) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024538001 = score(doc=297,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12684377 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 297, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=297)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Date
- 22. 3.2002 9:55:52
-
Chamis, A.Y.: Vocabulary control and search strategies in online searching (1991)
0.00
0.0016740077 = product of:
0.011718053 = sum of:
0.011718053 = product of:
0.058590267 = sum of:
0.058590267 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.058590267 = score(doc=820,freq=8.0), product of:
0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.5347345 = fieldWeight in 820, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=820)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- COMPASS
- Information retrieval
Information retrieval / Use of / On-line computers
- Subject
- Information retrieval
Information retrieval / Use of / On-line computers
-
Chen, S.Y.; Ford, N.J.: Modelling user navigation behaviours in a hypermedia-based learning system : an individual differences approach (1998)
0.00
0.0015879505 = product of:
0.011115653 = sum of:
0.011115653 = product of:
0.055578265 = sum of:
0.055578265 = weight(_text_:system in 831) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055578265 = score(doc=831,freq=8.0), product of:
0.11408355 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.4871716 = fieldWeight in 831, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=831)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- The rapid evolution of hypermedia technology makes it possible to access an immense volume of information in an educational setting. This research examines the relationship between individual differences (in particular, cognitive styles) and navigation strategies using a WWW-based hyper-media learning system. The hypermedia learning system was used at Sheffield University's Department of Information Studies. 20 Master students were pre-tested for their cognitive styles. Dependent variables included navigation patterns, selection of navigation tools, and reactions to the hypermedia system. the results indicated that students with differing cognitive styles and individual characteristics selected different access facilities and applied different navigation patterns. The implication of these findings and the role of individual differences in designing hypermedia-based learning systems are discussed
-
Pejtersen, A.M.: Cognitive engineering in information retrieval domains : merging paradigms? (1995)
0.00
0.0014647568 = product of:
0.010253297 = sum of:
0.010253297 = product of:
0.051266484 = sum of:
0.051266484 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.051266484 = score(doc=3249,freq=2.0), product of:
0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 3249, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3249)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
-
Spink, A.; Goodrum, A.; Robins, D.: Elicitation behavior during mediated information retrieval (1998)
0.00
0.0014647568 = product of:
0.010253297 = sum of:
0.010253297 = product of:
0.051266484 = sum of:
0.051266484 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3265) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.051266484 = score(doc=3265,freq=8.0), product of:
0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 3265, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3265)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- Considers what elicitation or requests for information search intermediaries make of users with information requests during an information retrieval interaction - including prior to and during an information retrieval interaction - and for what purpose. Reports a study of elicitations during 40 mediated information retrieval interactions. Identifies a total of 1.557 search intermediary elicitations within 15 purpose categories. The elicitation purposes of search intermediaries included requests for information on search terms and strategies, database selection, search procedures, system's outputs and relevance of retrieved items, and users' knowledge and previous information seeking. Investigates the transition sequences from 1 type of search intermediary elicitation to another. Compares these findings with results from a study of end user questions
-
DiMartino, D.; Zoe, L.R.: End-user full-text searching : access or excess? (1996)
0.00
0.0013752056 = product of:
0.009626439 = sum of:
0.009626439 = product of:
0.048132192 = sum of:
0.048132192 = weight(_text_:system in 166) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048132192 = score(doc=166,freq=6.0), product of:
0.11408355 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.42190298 = fieldWeight in 166, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=166)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- Reports a study which examined and assessed the search techniques of trained end-users to determine whether or not they were searching the system affectively. 131 multilingual graduate students at Baruch College, City University of New York searched a full-text system and completed a survey that asked them to evaluate the system and describe their search strategy and techniques. 55% indicated dissatisfaction with their searches. Correlations between native language and searching results and satisfaction are shown. Findings suggest that computer-literate end users with prior experience searching other databases and formal training experience more difficulties than in commonly realized. Discusses the implications for training
-
Keen, E.M.: Some aspects of proximity searching in text retrieval systems (1992)
0.00
0.0011837021 = product of:
0.008285915 = sum of:
0.008285915 = product of:
0.04142957 = sum of:
0.04142957 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 6190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04142957 = score(doc=6190,freq=4.0), product of:
0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.37811437 = fieldWeight in 6190, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6190)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- Describes and evaluates the proximity search facilities in external online systems and in-house retrieval software. Discusses and illustrates capabilities, syntax and circumstances of use. Presents measurements of the overheads required by proximity for storage, record input time and search time. The search strategy narrowing effect of proximity is illustrated by recall and precision test results. Usage and problems lead to a number of design ideas for better implementation: some based on existing Boolean strategies, one on the use of weighted proximity to automatically produce ranked output. A comparison of Boolean, quorum and proximate term pairs distance is included
-
Ury, C.J.; Johnson, C.V.; Meldrem, J.A.: Teaching a heuristic approach to information retrieval (1997)
0.00
0.0011837021 = product of:
0.008285915 = sum of:
0.008285915 = product of:
0.04142957 = sum of:
0.04142957 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 831) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04142957 = score(doc=831,freq=4.0), product of:
0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.37811437 = fieldWeight in 831, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=831)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- To become lifelong learners, students must acquire information retrieval skills for future as well as current information needs. Describes how the library use instruction programme at Northwest Missouri State University incorporates a heuristic model in which students continually evaluate and refine their information seeking practices while progressing through all levels of courses in diverse disciplines. Collegial partnerships with departmental faculty and ongoing instructional assessment are essential to the success of the programme
-
Shaw, D.: Bibliographic database searching by graduate students in language and literature : search strategies, system interfaces, and relevance judgements (1995)
0.00
9.624433E-4 = product of:
0.0067371028 = sum of:
0.0067371028 = product of:
0.033685513 = sum of:
0.033685513 = weight(_text_:system in 5651) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033685513 = score(doc=5651,freq=4.0), product of:
0.11408355 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.29527056 = fieldWeight in 5651, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5651)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- Reports on a study conducted at Indiana University in the summer of 1993 which observed 10 advanced graduate students in language and literature studies as they conducted literature searches using databases on CD-ROM. Presents a brief review of related literature on relevance judgements, human-computer interaction (HCI) and information seeking behaviour of humanities students. The search strategies of the graduate students under study were found to be typical of humanities scholars, who create large sets and review records quickly to select relevant items. Factors influencing relevance assessments included language, source of publication, author, and length of work. Participants especially appreciated electronic access to the Modern Language Association (MLA) International Bibliography but encountered problems with the controlled vocabulary and analytic entries for books and proceedings. The study has identified problems with database content, presentation and search interfaces which should be considered by system designers
-
Zorn, P.: Advanced web searching : tricks of the trade (1996)
0.00
9.0740033E-4 = product of:
0.006351802 = sum of:
0.006351802 = product of:
0.03175901 = sum of:
0.03175901 = weight(_text_:system in 5142) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03175901 = score(doc=5142,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11408355 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.27838376 = fieldWeight in 5142, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5142)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- Examines, from the perspective of professional searchers, WWW search engines that provide advanced search features and search a comprehensive abd authoritative database of Internet sites. Looks at: AltaVista, InfoSeek, Lycos, and OpenText. Gives a detailed description of each of the system, their features, how to use them and how the search engines performed on sample searches
-
Cleary, J.S.: Asking the right question : formulating effective search strategies for electronic databases (1997)
0.00
8.3700387E-4 = product of:
0.0058590267 = sum of:
0.0058590267 = product of:
0.029295133 = sum of:
0.029295133 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1550) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029295133 = score(doc=1550,freq=2.0), product of:
0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 1550, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1550)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- Describes a simple technique that enables students to practice skills in formulating search strategies for electronic databases. Currently used in some library instruction classes at Slippery Roch University, this technique employs cooperative learning and critical thinking skills, requires relatively little time, and is effective with both undergraduates and graduates. In particular this technique claerly demonstrates that information retrieval is greatly affected by the manner in which the question is asked
