Search (22 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  • × theme_ss:"Retrievalalgorithmen"
  1. Tober, M.; Hennig, L.; Furch, D.: SEO Ranking-Faktoren und Rang-Korrelationen 2014 : Google Deutschland (2014) 0.03 
    0.03105314 = product of:
  0.09315942 = sum of:
    0.08571266 = weight(_text_:suchmaschinen in 1484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08571266 = score(doc=1484,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.15347718 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4677734 = idf(docFreq=1378, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03435205 = queryNorm
        0.5584717 = fieldWeight in 1484, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.4677734 = idf(docFreq=1378, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1484)
    0.007446766 = product of:
      0.03723383 = sum of:
        0.03723383 = weight(_text_:22 in 1484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03723383 = score(doc=1484,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.120295025 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03435205 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1484, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1484)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    Dieses Whitepaper beschäftigt sich mit der Definition und Bewertung von Faktoren, die eine hohe Rangkorrelation-Koeffizienz mit organischen Suchergebnissen aufweisen und dient dem Zweck der tieferen Analyse von Suchmaschinen-Algorithmen. Die Datenerhebung samt Auswertung bezieht sich auf Ranking-Faktoren für Google-Deutschland im Jahr 2014. Zusätzlich wurden die Korrelationen und Faktoren unter anderem anhand von Durchschnitts- und Medianwerten sowie Entwicklungstendenzen zu den Vorjahren hinsichtlich ihrer Relevanz für vordere Suchergebnis-Positionen interpretiert.
    Date
    13. 9.2014 14:45:22
    Theme
    Suchmaschinen
  2. Walz, J.: Analyse der Übertragbarkeit allgemeiner Rankingfaktoren von Web-Suchmaschinen auf Discovery-Systeme (2018) 0.01 
    0.013122018 = product of:
  0.07873211 = sum of:
    0.07873211 = weight(_text_:suchmaschinen in 5744) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07873211 = score(doc=5744,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.15347718 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4677734 = idf(docFreq=1378, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03435205 = queryNorm
        0.51298904 = fieldWeight in 5744, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          4.4677734 = idf(docFreq=1378, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5744)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    Ziel: Ziel dieser Bachelorarbeit war es, die Übertragbarkeit der allgemeinen Rankingfaktoren, wie sie von Web-Suchmaschinen verwendet werden, auf Discovery-Systeme zu analysieren. Dadurch könnte das bisher hauptsächlich auf dem textuellen Abgleich zwischen Suchanfrage und Dokumenten basierende bibliothekarische Ranking verbessert werden. Methode: Hierfür wurden Faktoren aus den Gruppen Popularität, Aktualität, Lokalität, Technische Faktoren, sowie dem personalisierten Ranking diskutiert. Die entsprechenden Rankingfaktoren wurden nach ihrer Vorkommenshäufigkeit in der analysierten Literatur und der daraus abgeleiteten Wichtigkeit, ausgewählt. Ergebnis: Von den 23 untersuchten Rankingfaktoren sind 14 (61 %) direkt vom Ranking der Web-Suchmaschinen auf das Ranking der Discovery-Systeme übertragbar. Zu diesen zählen unter anderem das Klickverhalten, das Erstellungsdatum, der Nutzerstandort, sowie die Sprache. Sechs (26%) der untersuchten Faktoren sind dagegen nicht übertragbar (z.B. Aktualisierungsfrequenz und Ladegeschwindigkeit). Die Linktopologie, die Nutzungshäufigkeit, sowie die Aktualisierungsfrequenz sind mit entsprechenden Modifikationen übertragbar.
  3. Bauckhage, C.: Marginalizing over the PageRank damping factor (2014) 0.01 
    0.012626667 = product of:
  0.07576 = sum of:
    0.07576 = weight(_text_:suchmaschinen in 928) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07576 = score(doc=928,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15347718 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4677734 = idf(docFreq=1378, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03435205 = queryNorm
        0.49362388 = fieldWeight in 928, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4677734 = idf(docFreq=1378, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=928)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Theme
    Suchmaschinen
  4. Behnert, C.; Plassmeier, K.; Borst, T.; Lewandowski, D.: Evaluierung von Rankingverfahren für bibliothekarische Informationssysteme (2019) 0.01 
    0.008838667 = product of:
  0.053032 = sum of:
    0.053032 = weight(_text_:suchmaschinen in 5023) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.053032 = score(doc=5023,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15347718 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4677734 = idf(docFreq=1378, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03435205 = queryNorm
        0.3455367 = fieldWeight in 5023, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4677734 = idf(docFreq=1378, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5023)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Theme
    Suchmaschinen
  5. Oberhauser, O.: Relevance Ranking in den Online-Katalogen der "nächsten Generation" (2010) 0.01 
    0.007576 = product of:
  0.045456 = sum of:
    0.045456 = weight(_text_:suchmaschinen in 4308) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.045456 = score(doc=4308,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15347718 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4677734 = idf(docFreq=1378, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03435205 = queryNorm
        0.29617432 = fieldWeight in 4308, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4677734 = idf(docFreq=1378, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4308)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    Relevance Ranking in Online-Katalogen ist zwar kein neues Thema, doch liegt dazu nicht allzu viel Literatur vor, die das Prädikat "ernstzunehmen" verdient. Dies ist zum einen darin begründet, dass das Interesse an der Ausgabe ranggereihter Ergebnislisten auf Seiten aller Beteiligter (Bibliothekare, Softwarehersteller, Benutzer) traditionell gering war. Zum anderen ging die seit einigen Jahren populär gewordene Kritik an den bestehenden OPACs vielfach von einer unzureichenden Wissensbasis aus und produzierte oft nur polemische oder emotional gefärbte Beiträge, die zum Thema Ranking wenig beitrugen. ... Der hier beschriebene Test ist natürlich in keiner Weise erschöpfend oder repräsentativ. Dennoch gibt er, wie ich glaube, Anlass zu einiger Hoffnung. Er lässt vermuten, dass die "neuen" OPACs - zumindest was das Relevance Ranking betrifft - auf dem Weg in die richtige Richtung sind. Wie gut es wirklich gelingen wird, die Rankingleistung von Suchmaschinen wie Google, die unter völlig anderen Voraussetzungen arbeiten, einzuholen, wird aber erst die Zukunft zeigen.
  6. Jindal, V.; Bawa, S.; Batra, S.: ¬A review of ranking approaches for semantic search on Web (2014) 0.01 
    0.007576 = product of:
  0.045456 = sum of:
    0.045456 = weight(_text_:suchmaschinen in 2799) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.045456 = score(doc=2799,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15347718 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4677734 = idf(docFreq=1378, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03435205 = queryNorm
        0.29617432 = fieldWeight in 2799, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4677734 = idf(docFreq=1378, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2799)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Theme
    Suchmaschinen
  7. Bhansali, D.; Desai, H.; Deulkar, K.: ¬A study of different ranking approaches for semantic search (2015) 0.01 
    0.0063133333 = product of:
  0.03788 = sum of:
    0.03788 = weight(_text_:suchmaschinen in 2696) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03788 = score(doc=2696,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15347718 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4677734 = idf(docFreq=1378, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03435205 = queryNorm
        0.24681194 = fieldWeight in 2696, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4677734 = idf(docFreq=1378, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2696)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Theme
    Suchmaschinen
  8. Bilal, D.: Ranking, relevance judgment, and precision of information retrieval on children's queries : evaluation of Google, Yahoo!, Bing, Yahoo! Kids, and ask Kids (2012) 0.01 
    0.0050506666 = product of:
  0.030304 = sum of:
    0.030304 = weight(_text_:suchmaschinen in 393) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.030304 = score(doc=393,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15347718 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4677734 = idf(docFreq=1378, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03435205 = queryNorm
        0.19744955 = fieldWeight in 393, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4677734 = idf(docFreq=1378, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=393)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Theme
    Suchmaschinen
  9. Fuhr, N.: Modelle im Information Retrieval (2013) 0.00 
    0.0016234969 = product of:
  0.009740981 = sum of:
    0.009740981 = product of:
      0.048704904 = sum of:
        0.048704904 = weight(_text_:28 in 724) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048704904 = score(doc=724,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12305808 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03435205 = queryNorm
            0.39578792 = fieldWeight in 724, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=724)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    5. 4.2013 13:47:28
  10. Maylein, L.; Langenstein, A.: Neues vom Relevanz-Ranking im HEIDI-Katalog der Universitätsbibliothek Heidelberg : Perspektiven für bibliothekarische Dienstleistungen (2013) 0.00 
    0.0012523937 = product of:
  0.007514362 = sum of:
    0.007514362 = product of:
      0.03757181 = sum of:
        0.03757181 = weight(_text_:29 in 775) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03757181 = score(doc=775,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12083977 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03435205 = queryNorm
            0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 775, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=775)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    29. 6.2013 18:06:23
  11. Bornmann, L.; Mutz, R.: From P100 to P100' : a new citation-rank approach (2014) 0.00 
    0.0012411277 = product of:
  0.007446766 = sum of:
    0.007446766 = product of:
      0.03723383 = sum of:
        0.03723383 = weight(_text_:22 in 1431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03723383 = score(doc=1431,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.120295025 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03435205 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1431, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1431)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    22. 8.2014 17:05:18
  12. Ravana, S.D.; Rajagopal, P.; Balakrishnan, V.: Ranking retrieval systems using pseudo relevance judgments (2015) 0.00 
    0.0010970123 = product of:
  0.0065820734 = sum of:
    0.0065820734 = product of:
      0.032910366 = sum of:
        0.032910366 = weight(_text_:22 in 2591) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032910366 = score(doc=2591,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.120295025 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03435205 = queryNorm
            0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2591, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2591)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
    18. 9.2018 18:22:56
  13. Habernal, I.; Konopík, M.; Rohlík, O.: Question answering (2012) 0.00 
    9.74098E-4 = product of:
  0.005844588 = sum of:
    0.005844588 = product of:
      0.02922294 = sum of:
        0.02922294 = weight(_text_:28 in 101) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02922294 = score(doc=101,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12305808 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03435205 = queryNorm
            0.23747274 = fieldWeight in 101, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=101)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    17. 4.2012 15:28:17
  14. Liu, X.; Turtle, H.: Real-time user interest modeling for real-time ranking (2013) 0.00 
    9.74098E-4 = product of:
  0.005844588 = sum of:
    0.005844588 = product of:
      0.02922294 = sum of:
        0.02922294 = weight(_text_:28 in 1035) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02922294 = score(doc=1035,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12305808 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03435205 = queryNorm
            0.23747274 = fieldWeight in 1035, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1035)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    28. 7.2013 12:59:19
  15. Mayr, P.: Bradfordizing als Re-Ranking-Ansatz in Literaturinformationssystemen (2011) 0.00 
    9.392953E-4 = product of:
  0.0056357714 = sum of:
    0.0056357714 = product of:
      0.028178858 = sum of:
        0.028178858 = weight(_text_:29 in 4292) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028178858 = score(doc=4292,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12083977 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03435205 = queryNorm
            0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 4292, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4292)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    9. 2.2011 17:47:29
  16. Hubert, G.; Pitarch, Y.; Pinel-Sauvagnat, K.; Tournier, R.; Laporte, L.: TournaRank : when retrieval becomes document competition (2018) 0.00 
    8.1174844E-4 = product of:
  0.0048704906 = sum of:
    0.0048704906 = product of:
      0.024352452 = sum of:
        0.024352452 = weight(_text_:28 in 5087) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024352452 = score(doc=5087,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12305808 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03435205 = queryNorm
            0.19789396 = fieldWeight in 5087, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5087)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    17. 3.2019 11:28:52
  17. Costa Carvalho, A. da; Rossi, C.; Moura, E.S. de; Silva, A.S. da; Fernandes, D.: LePrEF: Learn to precompute evidence fusion for efficient query evaluation (2012) 0.00 
    7.827461E-4 = product of:
  0.0046964767 = sum of:
    0.0046964767 = product of:
      0.023482382 = sum of:
        0.023482382 = weight(_text_:29 in 278) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023482382 = score(doc=278,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12083977 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03435205 = queryNorm
            0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 278, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=278)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    24. 6.2012 14:29:10
  18. Silva, R.M.; Gonçalves, M.A.; Veloso, A.: ¬A Two-stage active learning method for learning to rank (2014) 0.00 
    7.827461E-4 = product of:
  0.0046964767 = sum of:
    0.0046964767 = product of:
      0.023482382 = sum of:
        0.023482382 = weight(_text_:29 in 1184) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023482382 = score(doc=1184,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12083977 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03435205 = queryNorm
            0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 1184, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1184)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    26. 1.2014 20:29:57
  19. Zhu, J.; Han, L.; Gou, Z.; Yuan, X.: ¬A fuzzy clustering-based denoising model for evaluating uncertainty in collaborative filtering recommender systems (2018) 0.00 
    7.827461E-4 = product of:
  0.0046964767 = sum of:
    0.0046964767 = product of:
      0.023482382 = sum of:
        0.023482382 = weight(_text_:29 in 4460) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023482382 = score(doc=4460,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12083977 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03435205 = queryNorm
            0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 4460, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4460)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    29. 9.2018 12:32:59
  20. Baloh, P.; Desouza, K.C.; Hackney, R.: Contextualizing organizational interventions of knowledge management systems : a design science perspectiveA domain analysis (2012) 0.00 
    7.757048E-4 = product of:
  0.0046542287 = sum of:
    0.0046542287 = product of:
      0.023271143 = sum of:
        0.023271143 = weight(_text_:22 in 241) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023271143 = score(doc=241,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.120295025 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03435205 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 241, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=241)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    11. 6.2012 14:22:34

Authors

Languages

  • e 14
  • d 8

Types

  • a 20
  • el 1
  • r 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…

Themes