Search (263 results, page 1 of 14)

  • × theme_ss:"Suchtaktik"
  1. Koopmans, N.I.: What's your question? : The need for research information from the perspective of different user groups (2002) 0.02 
    0.021360878 = product of:
  0.06408263 = sum of:
    0.022217419 = weight(_text_:information in 3612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022217419 = score(doc=3612,freq=16.0), product of:
        0.067498945 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03845047 = queryNorm
        0.3291521 = fieldWeight in 3612, product of:
          4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
            16.0 = termFreq=16.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3612)
    0.04186521 = product of:
      0.062797815 = sum of:
        0.031540774 = weight(_text_:29 in 3612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031540774 = score(doc=3612,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13525672 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03845047 = queryNorm
            0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 3612, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3612)
        0.031257045 = weight(_text_:22 in 3612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031257045 = score(doc=3612,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13464698 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03845047 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3612, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3612)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    In this paper results of a field study into the need for research information of different user groups are presented: scientists, policy makers and policy researchers, industry and media. Main questions of semi-structured interviews were: what kind of research information users need, what kind of research information resources are used and which information resources are missing at the moment. User groups are missing for a diversity of reasons the overview of research, experts and institutes in the different scientific fields. Especially for the accessibility and transparency of the scientific world these overviews are reported to be needed. Neither Google nor any of the research institutes or policy research organisations are able to present surveys for different science fields at the moment. Giving users the possibility to search, browse and navigate through accessible and more specialised layers of research information might give answers to different user groups simultaneously.
    Date
    2. 7.2005 12:22:50
    Source
    Gaining insight from research information (CRIS2002): Proceedings of the 6th International Conference an Current Research Information Systems, University of Kassel, August 29 - 31, 2002. Eds: W. Adamczak u. A. Nase
  2. Waschatz, B.: Schmökern ist schwierig : Viele Uni-Bibliotheken ordnen ihre Bücher nicht - Tipps für eine erfolgreiche Suche (2010) 0.02 
    0.020929188 = product of:
  0.06278756 = sum of:
    0.057578053 = weight(_text_:geschichte in 3206) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.057578053 = score(doc=3206,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.18274738 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.7528 = idf(docFreq=1036, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03845047 = queryNorm
        0.3150691 = fieldWeight in 3206, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          4.7528 = idf(docFreq=1036, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3206)
    0.0052095074 = product of:
      0.015628522 = sum of:
        0.015628522 = weight(_text_:22 in 3206) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015628522 = score(doc=3206,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13464698 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03845047 = queryNorm
            0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 3206, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3206)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Content
    "Ein häufiger Fehler ist auch, bei Google nach Büchern zu suchen", sagt Grau. Die Suchmaschine enthält keine Bibliotheksdaten. Außerdem sollten Studenten darauf achten, ob sie nach einem Zeitschriften-Artikel oder einer Monografie suchen. Benötigt man einen Aufsatz, muss man nach dem Titel der Zeitschrift und nicht nach dem Titel des Artikels suchen. Wichtig ist auch, den Suchschlüssel zu beachten. Wer nach dem Autor Johann Wolfgang von Goethe sucht, aber das Wort in der Titelsuche eingibt, bekommt andere Treffermengen. Studenten sollten die Suche auch nicht zu sehr eingrenzen. "Dann findet man nichts", warnt Grau. Andererseits darf man auch nicht zu allgemein suchen. Wer nach einem Buch zur deutschen Geschichte sucht, bekommt bei der Eingabe von "deutsche Geschichte" Tausende Treffer. "Da muss man den richtigen Suchschlüssel auswählen", erklärt Grau. Wer im Feld "Titelanfänge" etwa "deutsche Geschichte" eingibt, finde alle Titel mit diesen Wörtern in genau dieser Reihenfolge. Er lande also nicht beim Buch "Deutsche Naturlyrik: ihre Geschichte in Einzelanalysen". Das ist bei weit gefassten Begriffen sehr wichtig und hilfreich."
    Date
    3. 5.1997 8:44:22
  3. Branch, J.L.: Investigating the information-seeking process of adolescents : the value of using think alouds and think afters (2000) 0.02 
    0.016743787 = product of:
  0.05023136 = sum of:
    0.025920324 = weight(_text_:information in 3924) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.025920324 = score(doc=3924,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.067498945 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03845047 = queryNorm
        0.3840108 = fieldWeight in 3924, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3924)
    0.024311034 = product of:
      0.0729331 = sum of:
        0.0729331 = weight(_text_:22 in 3924) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0729331 = score(doc=3924,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13464698 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03845047 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3924, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3924)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Source
    Library and information science research. 22(2000) no.4, S.371-382
  4. Morse, P.M.: Browsing and search theory (1973) 0.02 
    0.016280917 = product of:
  0.0976855 = sum of:
    0.0976855 = product of:
      0.14652824 = sum of:
        0.07359514 = weight(_text_:29 in 3339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07359514 = score(doc=3339,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13525672 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03845047 = queryNorm
            0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 3339, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3339)
        0.0729331 = weight(_text_:22 in 3339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0729331 = score(doc=3339,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13464698 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03845047 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3339, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3339)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    22. 5.2005 19:52:29
  5. Limberg, L.: Three conceptions of information seeking and use (1999) 0.01 
    0.0132699665 = product of:
  0.039809898 = sum of:
    0.029390885 = weight(_text_:information in 281) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029390885 = score(doc=281,freq=28.0), product of:
        0.067498945 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03845047 = queryNorm
        0.4354273 = fieldWeight in 281, product of:
          5.2915025 = tf(freq=28.0), with freq of:
            28.0 = termFreq=28.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=281)
    0.010419015 = product of:
      0.031257045 = sum of:
        0.031257045 = weight(_text_:22 in 281) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031257045 = score(doc=281,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13464698 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03845047 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 281, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=281)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    This study grew out of a need for better research based understanding of information seeking and use in a specific context. Several researchers in library and information studies (LIS) pointed out the predominance of research on information needs and information seeking and expressed a need for the study of information use (i.a. Kuhlthau 1993; Vakkari 1997; Wilson 1981). The role of context for information seeking behaviour has been stressed (i.a. Dervin 1997; Wilson 1981, 1994). The complex process of information seeking and use in learning contexts needs further exploration, according to i.a. Kuhlthau (1993). My research project investigated how students used information and what they learnt from the information they retrieved and used for an assignment. The aim of the project was to study information seeking through an explorative investigation of the interaction between information seeking and use and learning outcomes.
    Date
    22. 3.2002 9:53:10
    Source
    Exploring the contexts of information behaviour: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Research in Information Needs, Seeking and Use in Different Contexts, Sheffield, UK, 1998. Ed. by D.K. Wilson u. D.K. Allen
  6. Wilson, T.D.: Exploring models of information behaviour : the 'uncertainty' project (1999) 0.01 
    0.012728727 = product of:
  0.03818618 = sum of:
    0.025920324 = weight(_text_:information in 6785) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.025920324 = score(doc=6785,freq=16.0), product of:
        0.067498945 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03845047 = queryNorm
        0.3840108 = fieldWeight in 6785, product of:
          4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
            16.0 = termFreq=16.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6785)
    0.012265856 = product of:
      0.03679757 = sum of:
        0.03679757 = weight(_text_:29 in 6785) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03679757 = score(doc=6785,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13525672 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03845047 = queryNorm
            0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 6785, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6785)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    My original intention in this Keynote Paper was to talk about models of information behaviour, and I shall do that to some extent. However, both Carol Kuhlthau and Amanda Spink address this general conceptual level of research into information-seeking behaviour and I thought it would more appropriate to present my current research.
    Content
    Enthält Grafik des Schalen-Modells: Information searching behaviour < Information seeking behaviour < Information behaviour
    Date
    23. 3.2002 9:29:18
    Source
    Exploring the contexts of information behaviour: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Research in Information Needs, Seeking and Use in Different Contexts, Sheffield, UK, 1998. Ed. by D.K. Wilson u. D.K. Allen
  7. Lin, S.-j.; Belkin, N.: Validation of a model of information seeking over multiple search sessions (2005) 0.01 
    0.012543229 = product of:
  0.037629686 = sum of:
    0.027210671 = weight(_text_:information in 3450) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.027210671 = score(doc=3450,freq=24.0), product of:
        0.067498945 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03845047 = queryNorm
        0.40312737 = fieldWeight in 3450, product of:
          4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
            24.0 = termFreq=24.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3450)
    0.010419015 = product of:
      0.031257045 = sum of:
        0.031257045 = weight(_text_:22 in 3450) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031257045 = score(doc=3450,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13464698 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03845047 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3450, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3450)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    Most information systems share a common assumption: information seeking is discrete. Such an assumption neither reflects real-life information seeking processes nor conforms to the perspective of phenomenology, "life is a journey constituted by continuous acquisition of knowledge." Thus, this study develops and validates a theoretical model that explains successive search experience for essentially the same information problem. The proposed model is called Multiple Information Seeking Episodes (MISE), which consists of four dimensions: problematic situation, information problem, information seeking process, episodes. Eight modes of multiple information seeking episodes are identified and specified with properties of the four dimensions of MISE. The results partially validate MISE by finding that the original MISE model is highly accurate, but less sufficient in characterizing successive searches; all factors in the MISE model are empirically confirmed, but new factors are identified as weIl. The revised MISE model is shifted from the user-centered to the interaction-centered perspective, taking into account factors of searcher, system, search activity, search context, information attainment, and information use activities.
    Date
    10. 4.2005 14:52:22
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 56(2005) no.4, S.393-415
  8. Heinström, J.: Broad exploration or precise specificity : two basic information seeking patterns among students (2006) 0.01 
    0.0121707 = product of:
  0.0365121 = sum of:
    0.024246242 = weight(_text_:information in 6004) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.024246242 = score(doc=6004,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.067498945 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03845047 = queryNorm
        0.3592092 = fieldWeight in 6004, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6004)
    0.012265856 = product of:
      0.03679757 = sum of:
        0.03679757 = weight(_text_:29 in 6004) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03679757 = score(doc=6004,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13525672 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03845047 = queryNorm
            0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 6004, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6004)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    This article investigates whether information seeking patterns can be related to discipline differences, study approaches, and personality traits. A quantitative study of 305 master's thesis students' information behavior found that their information seeking tended to be either exploratory or precise. Statistical analyses showed that inner traits seemed more influential than discipline characteristics an information behavior. Exploration or specificity was manifested in terms of both the level and scope of information students wished to retrieve and the way they searched for it.
    Date
    2.10.2006 13:29:01
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(2006) no.11, S.1440-1450
  9. Pejtersen, A.M.: Design of a classification scheme for fiction based on an analysis of actual user-librarian communication, and use of the scheme for control of librarians' search strategies (1980) 0.01 
    0.011959847 = product of:
  0.03587954 = sum of:
    0.018514516 = weight(_text_:information in 5835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018514516 = score(doc=5835,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.067498945 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03845047 = queryNorm
        0.27429342 = fieldWeight in 5835, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5835)
    0.017365025 = product of:
      0.052095074 = sum of:
        0.052095074 = weight(_text_:22 in 5835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.052095074 = score(doc=5835,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13464698 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03845047 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5835, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5835)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Date
    5. 8.2006 13:22:44
    Source
    Theory and application of information research. Proc. of the 2nd Int. Research Forum on Information Science, 3.-6.8.1977, Copenhagen. Ed.: O. Harbo u, L. Kajberg
  10. Bates, M.J.: Information search tactics (1979) 0.01 
    0.011654968 = product of:
  0.034964904 = sum of:
    0.020946784 = weight(_text_:information in 2407) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.020946784 = score(doc=2407,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.067498945 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03845047 = queryNorm
        0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 2407, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2407)
    0.014018122 = product of:
      0.042054366 = sum of:
        0.042054366 = weight(_text_:29 in 2407) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042054366 = score(doc=2407,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13525672 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03845047 = queryNorm
            0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 2407, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2407)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    As part of the study of human information search strategy, the concept of the search tactic, or move made to futher a search, is introduced. 29 search tactics are named, defined, and discussed in 4 categories: monitoring, file structure, search formulation, and term. Implications of the search tactics for research in search strategy are considered. The search tactics are inteded to be practically useful in information searching. This approach to searching is designed to be general, yet nontrivial; it is applicable to both bibliographic and reference searches and in both manual and on-line systems
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 30(1979), S.205-214
  11. Byström, K.: Information seekers in context : an analysis of the 'doer' in INSU studies (1999) 0.01 
    0.010452691 = product of:
  0.031358074 = sum of:
    0.02267556 = weight(_text_:information in 297) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02267556 = score(doc=297,freq=24.0), product of:
        0.067498945 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03845047 = queryNorm
        0.3359395 = fieldWeight in 297, product of:
          4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
            24.0 = termFreq=24.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=297)
    0.008682513 = product of:
      0.026047537 = sum of:
        0.026047537 = weight(_text_:22 in 297) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026047537 = score(doc=297,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13464698 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03845047 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 297, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=297)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    In information needs, seeking and use (INSU) research, individuals have most commonly been perceived as users (e.g., Kuhlthau, 1991; Dervin & Nilan, 1986; Dervin, 1989; Belkin, 1980). The concept user originates from the user of libraries and other information services and information systems. Over the years the scope of the concept has become wider and it is nowadays often understood in the sense of seekers of information (e.g., Wilson, 1981; Marchionini, 1995) and users of information (e.g., Streatfield, 1983). Nevertheless, the concept has remained ambiguous by being on the one hand universal and on the other hand extremely specific. The purpose of this paper is to map and evaluate views on people whose information behaviour has been in one way or another the core of our research area. The goal is to shed some light on various relationships between the different aspects of doers in INSU studies. The paper is inspired by Dervin's (1997) analysis of context where she identified among other themes the nature of subject by contrasting a `transcendental individual' with a `decentered subject', and Talja's (1997) presentation about constituting `information' and `user' from the discourse analytic viewpoint as opposed to the cognitive viewpoint. Instead of the metatheoretical approach applied by Dervin and Talja, a more concrete approach is valid in the present analysis where no direct arguments for or against the underlying metatheories are itemised. The focus is on doers in INSU studies leaving other, even closely-related concepts (i.e., information, information seeking, knowledge etc.), outside the scope of the paper.
    Date
    22. 3.2002 9:55:52
    Source
    Exploring the contexts of information behaviour: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Research in Information Needs, Seeking and Use in Different Contexts, Sheffield, UK, 1998. Ed. by D.K. Wilson u. D.K. Allen
  12. Whitmire, E.: Undergraduates' information seeking behavior : the role of epistemological development theories and models (1999) 0.01 
    0.010432029 = product of:
  0.031296086 = sum of:
    0.020782493 = weight(_text_:information in 599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.020782493 = score(doc=599,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.067498945 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03845047 = queryNorm
        0.3078936 = fieldWeight in 599, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=599)
    0.010513592 = product of:
      0.031540774 = sum of:
        0.031540774 = weight(_text_:29 in 599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031540774 = score(doc=599,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13525672 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03845047 = queryNorm
            0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 599, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=599)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    Researchers in the discipline of Higher Education have examined philosophical and psychological literature to develop epistemological development theories and models. They are primarily interested in understanding: "how individuals come to know, the theories and beliefs they hold about knowing, and the manner in which such epistemological premises are a part of and an influence on the cognitive processes of thinking and reasoning" (Hofer & Pintrinch, 1997). I propose to develop a theoretical framework for undergraduates' information seeking behavior based upon the insights into their knowledge construction offered through these models and theories of epistemological development. Epistemology is defined as "the philosophical study of the nature, sources, and limits of knowledge' (Moser, Mulder, & Trout, 1998). I will focus my paper on four major theories and models of undergraduates' epistemological development. I will present a new model of information seeking behavior incorporating these theories and models about how undergraduates construct knowledge and the consequent influence on their information seeking behavior
    Date
    26. 5.2002 15:29:17
    Imprint
    Medford, NJ : Information Today
    Series
    Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science; vol.36
    Source
    Knowledge: creation, organization and use. Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science, 31.10.-4.11.1999. Ed.: L. Woods
  13. Xu, Y.: ¬The dynamics of interactive information retrieval behavior : part I: an activity theory perspective (2007) 0.01 
    0.010400503 = product of:
  0.031201508 = sum of:
    0.020782493 = weight(_text_:information in 331) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.020782493 = score(doc=331,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.067498945 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03845047 = queryNorm
        0.3078936 = fieldWeight in 331, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=331)
    0.010419015 = product of:
      0.031257045 = sum of:
        0.031257045 = weight(_text_:22 in 331) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031257045 = score(doc=331,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13464698 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03845047 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 331, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=331)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    Human information-seeking behavior is a topic of increasing interest in many disciplines. However, the dynamics of this behavior remain elusive. The extant research has taken cognitive and behavioral perspectives to study information-seeking behavior, and observed its dynamics in multiple sessions. However, the underlying mechanisms that govern the dynamics of information-seeking behavior are not well understood. With a focus on interactive information retrieval behavior, this study proposes an integrated framework based on activity theory. This framework is not only comprehensive and integrated, but also offers an explanation of the mechanisms governing the interaction between users' cognitive states and their manifested behavior when using an information retrieval system. A set of four propositions are advanced to describe the mechanisms. The implications are discussed.
    Date
    27. 5.2007 13:55:22
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 58(2007) no.7, S.958-970
  14. Saastamoinen, M.; Järvelin, K.: Search task features in work tasks of varying types and complexity (2017) 0.01 
    0.010400503 = product of:
  0.031201508 = sum of:
    0.020782493 = weight(_text_:information in 3589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.020782493 = score(doc=3589,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.067498945 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03845047 = queryNorm
        0.3078936 = fieldWeight in 3589, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3589)
    0.010419015 = product of:
      0.031257045 = sum of:
        0.031257045 = weight(_text_:22 in 3589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031257045 = score(doc=3589,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13464698 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03845047 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3589, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3589)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    Information searching in practice seldom is an end in itself. In work, work task (WT) performance forms the context, which information searching should serve. Therefore, information retrieval (IR) systems development/evaluation should take the WT context into account. The present paper analyzes how WT features: task complexity and task types, affect information searching in authentic work: the types of information needs, search processes, and search media. We collected data on 22 information professionals in authentic work situations in three organization types: city administration, universities, and companies. The data comprise 286 WTs and 420 search tasks (STs). The data include transaction logs, video recordings, daily questionnaires, interviews. and observation. The data were analyzed quantitatively. Even if the participants used a range of search media, most STs were simple throughout the data, and up to 42% of WTs did not include searching. WT's effects on STs are not straightforward: different WT types react differently to WT complexity. Due to the simplicity of authentic searching, the WT/ST types in interactive IR experiments should be reconsidered.
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 68(2017) no.5, S.1111-1123
  15. Shah, G.A.; Desai, A.T.; Nagarkar, S.A.: Search strategies : their importance in IR process (1992) 0.01 
    0.010204799 = product of:
  0.030614395 = sum of:
    0.01309174 = weight(_text_:information in 3806) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01309174 = score(doc=3806,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.067498945 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03845047 = queryNorm
        0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 3806, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3806)
    0.017522654 = product of:
      0.05256796 = sum of:
        0.05256796 = weight(_text_:29 in 3806) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05256796 = score(doc=3806,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13525672 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03845047 = queryNorm
            0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 3806, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3806)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    Discusses how users' questions should be analysed and appropriate search strategies should be formulated with a view to enhancing the capabilities of a system in retrieval of the most relevant information with a high degree of precision
    Source
    Proceedings of the 15th National IASLIC Conference, Annamalainagar, Tamil Nadu, India, 26-29 December 1992. Ed. by. A. Chatterjee et al
  16. Mansourian, Y.: Contextual elements and conceptual components of information visibility on the web (2008) 0.01 
    0.010130903 = product of:
  0.030392706 = sum of:
    0.021710195 = weight(_text_:information in 2603) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.021710195 = score(doc=2603,freq=22.0), product of:
        0.067498945 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03845047 = queryNorm
        0.32163754 = fieldWeight in 2603, product of:
          4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
            22.0 = termFreq=22.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2603)
    0.008682513 = product of:
      0.026047537 = sum of:
        0.026047537 = weight(_text_:22 in 2603) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026047537 = score(doc=2603,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13464698 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03845047 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2603, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2603)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    Purpose - This paper aims to report the result of follow-up research on end-users' conceptions of information visibility on the web and their conceptualizations of success and failure in web searching. Design/methodology/approach - The data were collected by a questionnaire followed by a brief interview with the participants. The questionnaire was developed based on the information visibility model suggested by the author in the original study. Fifty-two library and information sciences students from Tarbiat Mollem University (TMU) and Iran University of Medical Sciences (IUMS) in Tehran took part in the study. Findings - The model of information visibility can enable web users to gain a better understanding of their information seeking (IS) outcomes and it can assist them to improve their information literacy skills. The model can provide a theoretical framework to investigate web users' IS behavior and can be used as a diagnostic tool to explore the contextual and conceptual elements affecting the visibility of information for end-users. Research limitations/implications - The paper suggests a visibility learning diary (VLD), which might be useful to measure the efficiency of information literacy training courses. Originality/value - The contextual and conceptual approach of the paper provides a deeper insight into the issue of information visibility, which has received little attention by IS and information retrieval researchers until now.
    Date
    1. 1.2009 10:22:40
  17. Pontis, S.; Blandford, A.; Greifeneder, E.; Attalla, H.; Neal, D.: Keeping up to date : an academic researcher's information journey (2017) 0.01 
    0.010130903 = product of:
  0.030392706 = sum of:
    0.021710195 = weight(_text_:information in 3340) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.021710195 = score(doc=3340,freq=22.0), product of:
        0.067498945 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03845047 = queryNorm
        0.32163754 = fieldWeight in 3340, product of:
          4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
            22.0 = termFreq=22.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3340)
    0.008682513 = product of:
      0.026047537 = sum of:
        0.026047537 = weight(_text_:22 in 3340) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026047537 = score(doc=3340,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13464698 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03845047 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3340, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3340)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    Keeping up to date with research developments is a central activity of academic researchers, but researchers face difficulties in managing the rapid growth of available scientific information. This study examined how researchers stay up to date, using the information journey model as a framework for analysis and investigating which dimensions influence information behaviors. We designed a 2-round study involving semistructured interviews and prototype testing with 61 researchers with 3 levels of seniority (PhD student to professor). Data were analyzed following a semistructured qualitative approach. Five key dimensions that influence information behaviors were identified: level of seniority, information sources, state of the project, level of familiarity, and how well defined the relevant community is. These dimensions are interrelated and their values determine the flow of the information journey. Across all levels of professional expertise, researchers used similar hard (formal) sources to access content, while soft (interpersonal) sources were used to filter information. An important "pain point" that future information tools should address is helping researchers filter information at the point of need.
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 68(2017) no.1, S.22-35
  18. Lee, S.-S.; Theng, Y.-L.; Goh, D.H.-L.: Creative information seeking : part II: empirical verification (2007) 0.01 
    0.009886622 = product of:
  0.029659865 = sum of:
    0.01924085 = weight(_text_:information in 813) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01924085 = score(doc=813,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.067498945 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03845047 = queryNorm
        0.2850541 = fieldWeight in 813, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=813)
    0.010419015 = product of:
      0.031257045 = sum of:
        0.031257045 = weight(_text_:22 in 813) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031257045 = score(doc=813,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13464698 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03845047 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 813, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=813)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    Purpose - This is part II of on-going research, the purpose being to establish a creative information-seeking model. Design/methodology/approach - Two studies were conducted to examine the subjects' creative information seeking behaviours and the extent to which they exhibited the proposed stages in creative information seeking when accomplishing a directed and an open-ended information-seeking task respectively. Findings - Findings seemed to indicate that all the subjects underwent the proposed stages although they seemed to embrace characteristics of these stages in varying degrees. Findings also showed that if subjects performed the proposed stages more iteratively or non-sequentially, then a greater amount of creativity was needed to accomplish the information-seeking task. Originality/value - The paper offers a discussion on the relationships between creativity, complexity of tasks, and levels of expertise in domain knowledge.
    Date
    23.12.2007 12:22:16
  19. Mohan, K.C.: Boolean and nearest neighbour text searching in a multi-strategy retrieval system (1996) 0.01 
    0.009609912 = product of:
  0.028829735 = sum of:
    0.014811614 = weight(_text_:information in 7255) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014811614 = score(doc=7255,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.067498945 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03845047 = queryNorm
        0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 7255, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7255)
    0.014018122 = product of:
      0.042054366 = sum of:
        0.042054366 = weight(_text_:29 in 7255) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042054366 = score(doc=7255,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13525672 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03845047 = queryNorm
            0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 7255, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7255)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    Information retrieval systems based on the Boolean model have been popular for some time. A major challenge to this model has come from the development of approaches based on the vector processing model. Both search strategies are explained and evaluated. Describes an experimental study in an opertational environment to compare the retrieval effectiveness of Boolean and nearest neighbour searching in a multi-strategy retrieval system based on query characteristic variables. Considers the significance of the results of the study
    Source
    Library science with a slant to documentation and information studies. 33(1996) no.1, S.29-38
  20. Hopkins, M.E.; Zavalina, O.L.: Evaluating physicians' serendipitous knowledge discovery in online discovery systems : a new approach (2019) 0.01 
    0.009440041 = product of:
  0.028320123 = sum of:
    0.019637609 = weight(_text_:information in 5842) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.019637609 = score(doc=5842,freq=18.0), product of:
        0.067498945 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03845047 = queryNorm
        0.2909321 = fieldWeight in 5842, product of:
          4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
            18.0 = termFreq=18.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5842)
    0.008682513 = product of:
      0.026047537 = sum of:
        0.026047537 = weight(_text_:22 in 5842) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026047537 = score(doc=5842,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13464698 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03845047 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5842, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5842)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    Purpose A new approach to investigate serendipitous knowledge discovery (SKD) of health information is developed and tested to evaluate the information flow-serendipitous knowledge discovery (IF-SKD) model. The purpose of this paper is to determine the degree to which IF-SKD reflects physicians' information behaviour in a clinical setting and explore how the information system, Spark, designed to support physicians' SKD, meets its goals. Design/methodology/approach The proposed pre-experimental study design employs an adapted version of the McCay-Peet's (2013) and McCay-Peet et al.'s (2015) serendipitous digital environment (SDE) questionnaire research tool to address the complexity associated with defining the way in which SKD is understood and applied in system design. To test the IF-SKD model, the new data analysis approach combining confirmatory factor analysis, data imputation and Monte Carlo simulations was developed. Findings The piloting of the proposed novel analysis approach demonstrated that small sample information behaviour survey data can be meaningfully examined using a confirmatory factor analysis technique. Research limitations/implications This method allows to improve the reliability in measuring SKD and the generalisability of findings. Originality/value This paper makes an original contribution to developing and refining methods and tools of research into information-system-supported serendipitous discovery of information by health providers.
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
    Footnote
    Beitrag in einem Special Issue: Innovative Methods in Health Information Behaviour Research.
    Source
    Aslib journal of information management. 71(2019) no.6, S.755-772

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 257
  • d 3
  • ja 1
  • slv 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 252
  • m 9
  • el 2
  • s 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications