Search (8238 results, page 412 of 412)

  1. Mostafa, J.: Bessere Suchmaschinen für das Web (2006) 0.00 
    0.0035324458 = product of:
  0.0070648915 = sum of:
    0.0070648915 = product of:
      0.014129783 = sum of:
        0.014129783 = weight(_text_:22 in 4871) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014129783 = score(doc=4871,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18260197 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052144732 = queryNorm
            0.07738023 = fieldWeight in 4871, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=4871)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 1.2006 18:34:49
  2. Ewbank, L.: Crisis in subject cataloging and retrieval (1996) 0.00 
    0.0035324458 = product of:
  0.0070648915 = sum of:
    0.0070648915 = product of:
      0.014129783 = sum of:
        0.014129783 = weight(_text_:22 in 5580) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014129783 = score(doc=5580,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18260197 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052144732 = queryNorm
            0.07738023 = fieldWeight in 5580, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=5580)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) no.2, S.90-97
  3. Roth, G.; Merkel, G.: Haltet den Richter! : Schuld und Strafe (2010) 0.00 
    0.0035324458 = product of:
  0.0070648915 = sum of:
    0.0070648915 = product of:
      0.014129783 = sum of:
        0.014129783 = weight(_text_:22 in 3682) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014129783 = score(doc=3682,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18260197 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052144732 = queryNorm
            0.07738023 = fieldWeight in 3682, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=3682)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Footnote
    Erwiderung auf: Hassemer, W.: Haltet den geborenen Dieb! In:FAZ vom 15.06.2010. Vgl. die Erwiderung: Walter, M.: Unzulässige Überinterpretation: Schuld und Strafe. In: Frankfurter Rundschau. Nr.xxx vom 05.07.2010, S.xx. Vgl. auch: Janich, P.: Stillschweigende Hirngespinste: Die FR-Debatte zur Willensfreiheit. In: Frankfurter Rundschau. Nr.158 vom 12.07.2010, S.20-21. Lüderssen, K.: Wer determiniert die Hirnforscher?: Was ist Willensfreiheit (4). [Interview]. In: Frankfurter Rundschau. Nr.164 vom 19.07.2010, S.20-21. Pauen, M.: Das Schuldprinzip antasten, ohne es abzuschaffen: Was ist Willensfreiheit (5) oder: Wer ist verantwortlich für die Abschaffung von Verantwortung?. In: Frankfurter Rundschau. Nr.170 vom 26.07.2010, S.22-23. Vgl.: http://www.fr-online.de/in_und_ausland/kultur_und_medien/themen/?em_cnt=2788472&em_loc=3643.
  4. Jörn, F.: Wie Google für uns nach der ominösen Gluonenkraft stöbert : Software-Krabbler machen sich vor der Anfrage auf die Suche - Das Netz ist etwa fünfhundertmal größer als alles Durchforschte (2001) 0.00 
    0.0035324458 = product of:
  0.0070648915 = sum of:
    0.0070648915 = product of:
      0.014129783 = sum of:
        0.014129783 = weight(_text_:22 in 3684) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014129783 = score(doc=3684,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18260197 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052144732 = queryNorm
            0.07738023 = fieldWeight in 3684, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=3684)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 6.2005 9:52:00
  5. Walter, M.: Unzulässige Überinterpretation : Schuld und Strafe (2010) 0.00 
    0.0035324458 = product of:
  0.0070648915 = sum of:
    0.0070648915 = product of:
      0.014129783 = sum of:
        0.014129783 = weight(_text_:22 in 3686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014129783 = score(doc=3686,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18260197 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052144732 = queryNorm
            0.07738023 = fieldWeight in 3686, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=3686)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Footnote
    Erwiderung auf: Roth, G., G. Merkel: Haltet den Richter!: Schuld und Strafe. In: Frankfurter Rundschau. Nr.xxx vom 26.06.2010, S.xx. Bezugnahme auf: Hassemer, W.: Haltet den geborenen Dieb! In:FAZ vom 15.06.2010. Vgl. Erwiderung: Janich, P.: Stillschweigende Hirngespinste: Die FR-Debatte zur Willensfreiheit. In: Frankfurter Rundschau. Nr.158 vom 12.07.2010, S.20-21. Vgl. Fortsetzung: Lüderssen, K.: Wer determiniert die Hirnforscher?: Was ist Willensfreiheit (4). [Interview]. In: Frankfurter Rundschau. Nr.164 vom 19.07.2010, S.20-21. Pauen, M.: Das Schuldprinzip antasten, ohne es abzuschaffen: Was ist Willensfreiheit (5) oder: Wer ist verantwortlich für die Abschaffung von Verantwortung?. In: Frankfurter Rundschau. Nr.170 vom 26.07.2010, S.22-23. Vgl.: http://www.fr-online.de/top_news/?em_cnt=2814820&em_loc=2091.
  6. Lüderssen, K.: Wer determiniert die Hirnforscher? : Was ist Willensfreiheit (4) (2010) 0.00 
    0.0035324458 = product of:
  0.0070648915 = sum of:
    0.0070648915 = product of:
      0.014129783 = sum of:
        0.014129783 = weight(_text_:22 in 3711) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014129783 = score(doc=3711,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18260197 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052144732 = queryNorm
            0.07738023 = fieldWeight in 3711, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=3711)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Footnote
    Bezugnahme auf: Hassemer, W.: Haltet den geborenen Dieb! In: FAZ vom 15.06.2010. Erwiderung auf: Roth, G., G. Merkel: Haltet den Richter!: Schuld und Strafe. In: Frankfurter Rundschau. Nr.xxx vom 26.06.2010, S.xx. Walter, M.: Unzulässige Überinterpretation: Schuld und Strafe. In: Frankfurter Rundschau. Nr.xxx vom 05.07.2010, S.xx. Janich, P.: Stillschweigende Hirngespinste: Die FR-Debatte zur Willensfreiheit. In: Frankfurter Rundschau. Nr.158 vom 12.07.2010, S.20-21. Vgl. auch: Pauen, M.: Das Schuldprinzip antasten, ohne es abzuschaffen: Was ist Willensfreiheit (5) oder: Wer ist verantwortlich für die Abschaffung von Verantwortung?. In: Frankfurter Rundschau. Nr.170 vom 26.07.2010, S.22-23. Vgl.: http://www.fr-online.de/in_und_ausland/kultur_und_medien/feuilleton/?em_cnt=2860706&em_loc=89.
  7. Janich, P.: Stillschweigende Hirngespinste : Die FR-Debatte zur Willensfreiheit (2010) 0.00 
    0.0035324458 = product of:
  0.0070648915 = sum of:
    0.0070648915 = product of:
      0.014129783 = sum of:
        0.014129783 = weight(_text_:22 in 3712) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014129783 = score(doc=3712,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18260197 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052144732 = queryNorm
            0.07738023 = fieldWeight in 3712, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=3712)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Footnote
    Bezugnahme auf: Hassemer, W.: Haltet den geborenen Dieb! In: FAZ vom 15.06.2010. Erwiderung auf: Roth, G., G. Merkel: Haltet den Richter!: Schuld und Strafe. In: Frankfurter Rundschau. Nr.xxx vom 26.06.2010, S.xx. Walter, M.: Unzulässige Überinterpretation: Schuld und Strafe. In: Frankfurter Rundschau. Nr.xxx vom 05.07.2010, S.xx. Vgl. Fortsetzung: Lüderssen, K.: Wer determiniert die Hirnforscher?: Was ist Willensfreiheit (4). [Interview]. In: Frankfurter Rundschau. Nr.164 vom 19.07.2010, S.20-21. Pauen, M.: Das Schuldprinzip antasten, ohne es abzuschaffen: Was ist Willensfreiheit (5) oder: Wer ist verantwortlich für die Abschaffung von Verantwortung?. In: Frankfurter Rundschau. Nr.170 vom 26.07.2010, S.22-23. Vgl.: http://www.fr-online.de/in_und_ausland/kultur_und_medien/feuilleton/?em_cnt=2837272&em_loc=89.
  8. Pauen, M.: ¬Das Schuldprinzip antasten, ohne es abzuschaffen : Was ist Willensfreiheit (5) oder: Wer ist verantwortlich für die Abschaffung von Verantwortung? (2010) 0.00 
    0.0035324458 = product of:
  0.0070648915 = sum of:
    0.0070648915 = product of:
      0.014129783 = sum of:
        0.014129783 = weight(_text_:22 in 3720) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014129783 = score(doc=3720,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18260197 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052144732 = queryNorm
            0.07738023 = fieldWeight in 3720, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=3720)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Frankfurter Rundschau. Nr.170 vom 26.07.2010, S.22-23
  9. Bormann, F.-J.: Verantwortung und Verdrängung : Was ist Willensfreiheit (6): Die theologische Ethik versucht, menschliche Spielräume realistisch zu vermessen (2010) 0.00 
    0.0035324458 = product of:
  0.0070648915 = sum of:
    0.0070648915 = product of:
      0.014129783 = sum of:
        0.014129783 = weight(_text_:22 in 3908) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014129783 = score(doc=3908,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18260197 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052144732 = queryNorm
            0.07738023 = fieldWeight in 3908, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=3908)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Footnote
    Bezugnahme auf: Hassemer, W.: Haltet den geborenen Dieb! In: FAZ vom 15.06.2010. Erwiderung auf: Roth, G., G. Merkel: Haltet den Richter!: Schuld und Strafe. In: Frankfurter Rundschau. Nr.xxx vom 26.06.2010, S.xx. Walter, M.: Unzulässige Überinterpretation: Schuld und Strafe. In: Frankfurter Rundschau. Nr.xxx vom 05.07.2010, S.xx. Janich, P.: Stillschweigende Hirngespinste: Die FR-Debatte zur Willensfreiheit. In: Frankfurter Rundschau. Nr.158 vom 12.07.2010, S.20-21. Lüderssen, K.: Wer determiniert die Hirnforscher?: Was ist Willensfreiheit (4) [Interview]. In: Frankfurter Rundschau. Nr.164 vom 19.07.2010, S.20-21. Pauen, M.: Das Schuldprinzip antasten, ohne es abzuschaffen: Was ist Willensfreiheit (5) oder: Wer ist verantwortlich für die Abschaffung von Verantwortung?. In: Frankfurter Rundschau. Nr.170 vom 26.07.2010, S.22-23. Fortsetzung: Wingert, L.: An der Realität vorbei: Was ist Willensfreiheit (7): Weder Oberhoheit noch Separatismus: Über die Hirnforschung und ihre Ansprüche. In: Frankfurter Rundschau. Nr.182 vom 9.8.2010, S.20-21. Vgl. auch: Dahl, E., M. Pauen: Schuld und freier Wille. In: Spektrum der Wissenschaft. 2010, H.6, S.72-79. Vgl.: http://www.fr-online.de/kultur/verantwortung-und-verdraengung/-/1472786/4522900/-/index.html.
  10. Wingert, L.: An der Realität vorbei : Was ist Willensfreiheit (7): Weder Oberhoheit noch Separatismus: Über die Hirnforschung und ihre Ansprüche (2010) 0.00 
    0.0035324458 = product of:
  0.0070648915 = sum of:
    0.0070648915 = product of:
      0.014129783 = sum of:
        0.014129783 = weight(_text_:22 in 3909) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014129783 = score(doc=3909,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18260197 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052144732 = queryNorm
            0.07738023 = fieldWeight in 3909, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=3909)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Footnote
    Bezugnahme auf: Hassemer, W.: Haltet den geborenen Dieb! In: FAZ vom 15.06.2010. Erwiderung auf: Roth, G., G. Merkel: Haltet den Richter!: Schuld und Strafe. In: Frankfurter Rundschau. Nr.xxx vom 26.06.2010, S.xx. Walter, M.: Unzulässige Überinterpretation: Schuld und Strafe. In: Frankfurter Rundschau. Nr.xxx vom 05.07.2010, S.xx. Janich, P.: Stillschweigende Hirngespinste: Die FR-Debatte zur Willensfreiheit. In: Frankfurter Rundschau. Nr.158 vom 12.07.2010, S.20-21. Lüderssen, K.: Wer determiniert die Hirnforscher?: Was ist Willensfreiheit (4) [Interview]. In: Frankfurter Rundschau. Nr.164 vom 19.07.2010, S.20-21. Pauen, M.: Das Schuldprinzip antasten, ohne es abzuschaffen: Was ist Willensfreiheit (5) oder: Wer ist verantwortlich für die Abschaffung von Verantwortung?. In: Frankfurter Rundschau. Nr.170 vom 26.07.2010, S.22-23. Bormann, F.-J.: Verantwortung und Verdrängung: Was ist Willensfreiheit (6): Die theologische Ethik versucht, menschliche Spielräume realistisch zu vermessen. In: Frankfurter Rundschau. Nr.176 vom 2.8.2010, S.20-21. Vgl. auch: Dahl, E., M. Pauen: Schuld und freier Wille. In: Spektrum der Wissenschaft. 2010, H.6, S.72-79. Vgl.: http://www.fr-online.de/kultur/an-der-realitaet-vorbei/-/1472786/4540406/-/index.html.
  11. Reinartz, B.: Zwei Augen der Erkenntnis : Gehirnforscher behaupten, das bewusste Ich als Zentrum der Persönlichkeit sei nur eine raffinierte Täuschung (2002) 0.00 
    0.0035324458 = product of:
  0.0070648915 = sum of:
    0.0070648915 = product of:
      0.014129783 = sum of:
        0.014129783 = weight(_text_:22 in 3917) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014129783 = score(doc=3917,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18260197 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052144732 = queryNorm
            0.07738023 = fieldWeight in 3917, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=3917)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    17. 7.1996 9:33:22
  12. Ratzan, L.: Understanding information systems : what they do and why we need them (2004) 0.00 
    0.0028802026 = product of:
  0.005760405 = sum of:
    0.005760405 = product of:
      0.01152081 = sum of:
        0.01152081 = weight(_text_:data in 4581) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01152081 = score(doc=4581,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16488427 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052144732 = queryNorm
            0.0698721 = fieldWeight in 4581, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=4581)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Footnote
    In "Organizing Information" various fundamental organizational schemes are compared. These include hierarchical, relational, hypertext, and random access models. Each is described initially and then expanded an by listing advantages and disadvantages. This comparative format-not found elsewhere in the book-improves access to the subject and overall understanding. The author then affords considerable space to Boolean searching in the chapter "Retrieving Information." Throughout this chapter, the intricacies and problems of pattern matching and relevance are highlighted. The author elucidates the fact that document retrieval by simple pattern matching is not the same as problem solving. Therefore, "always know the nature of the problem you are trying to solve" (p. 56). This chapter is one of the more important ones in the book, covering a large topic swiftly and concisely. Chapters 5 through 11 then delve deeper into various specific issues of information systems. The chapters an securing and concealing information are exceptionally good. Without mentioning specific technologies, Mr. Ratzan is able to clearly present fundamental aspects of information security. Principles of backup security, password management, and encryption are also discussed in some detail. The latter is illustrated with some fascinating examples, from the Navajo Code Talkers to invisible ink and others. The chapters an measuring, counting, and numbering information complement each other well. Some of the more math-centric discussions and examples are found here. "Measuring Information" begins with a brief overview of bibliometrics and then moves quickly through Lotka's law, Zipf's law, and Bradford's law. For an LIS student, exposure to these topics is invaluable. Baseball statistics and web metrics are used for illustration purposes towards the end. In "counting Information," counting devices and methods are first presented, followed by discussion of the Fibonacci sequence and golden ratio. This relatively long chapter ends with examples of the tower of Hanoi, the changes of winning the lottery, and poker odds. The bulk of "Numbering Information" centers an prime numbers and pi. This chapter reads more like something out of an arithmetic book and seems somewhat extraneous here. Three specific types of information systems are presented in the second half of the book, each afforded its own chapter. These examples are universal as not to become dated or irrelevant over time. "The Computer as an Information System" is relatively short and focuses an bits, bytes, and data compression. Considering the Internet as an information system-chapter 13-is an interesting illustration. It brings up issues of IP addressing and the "privilege-vs.-right" access issue. We are reminded that the distinction between information rights and privileges is often unclear. A highlight of this chapter is the discussion of metaphors people use to describe the Internet, derived from the author's own research. He has found that people have varying mental models of the Internet, potentially affecting its perception and subsequent use.
  13. ¬Die Google-Gesellschaft : Vom digitalen Wandel des Wissens (2005) 0.00 
    0.0028802026 = product of:
  0.005760405 = sum of:
    0.005760405 = product of:
      0.01152081 = sum of:
        0.01152081 = weight(_text_:data in 4770) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01152081 = score(doc=4770,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16488427 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052144732 = queryNorm
            0.0698721 = fieldWeight in 4770, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=4770)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    - E-Rights. Bürgerrechte in der Informationsgesellschaft Eine breite Front neuer Bürgerrechtsbewegungen versucht die neu entstandenen Freiräume im Netz gegen staatliche und ökonomische Kontrollversuche zu verteidigen. Das Kapitel skizziert den Verlauf dieser Front, markiert die Teilnehmer und sagt, mit welchem rasanten Tempo staatliche Akteure Weichenstellungen für das kommende 21. Jahrhundert vornehmen. Wer entscheidet in Zukunft über den Umgang mit Wissen, Copyright und Zensur? Welche Bürgerrechte stehen zur Disposition? Schulzki-Haddouti, C.: Bürgerrechte im Netz. Zwischen Informationsfreiheit und Datenschutz Lüttcher, B.: Eine kurze Geschichte Freier Software. Interview mit Oliver Zendel Kuhlen, R.: Creative Commons. Im Interesse der Kreativen und der Innovation Charta der Bürgerrechte. Für eine nachhaltige Wissensgesellschaft. Version 3.0 - Wa(h)re Information. Die Ökonomie des Wissens Wissensmanagement und Data-Mining versprechen Unternehmen die aktive Nutzung brachliegender Ressourcen. Wissen gilt zumindest in den ökonomischen Diskursen als grundlegender Produktionsfaktor. Wie sieht es hier in der Praxis aus? Unternehmen schauen aber nicht nur nach innen, sondern auch über den Tellerrand: Die (legale und illegale) Beschaffung von Informationen über den Markt, die Wettbewerber und das Image der eigenen Firma wird zur täglichen Aufgabe. Domsalla, M.: Wissensmanagement und neue Wirtschaftsprozesse Speck, H. u. F.P. Thiele: Goggle, Gossip & PR-ostitution. Das Geschäft einer Suchmaschine Patzwaldt, K.: Google Inside Schilp, H.: Content-Broking. Handel mit digitalen Inhalten - Orientierungmaschinen. Massenmedien online Klassische Medien wie Fernsehen und Zeitung prägen bis heute das Bild des Alltags. Sie schaffen gemeinsames Wissen, transportieren kollektive Wertvorstellungen und neue Wissensmuster. Mit dem Gang ins Internet wagen sich die Massenmedien auf ein fremdes Terrain. Viele ehrgeizige Projekte können als gescheitert gelten, andere haben sich wider Erwarten durchgesetzt. Was ist wirklich neu an Online-Medien? Und welche Rückwirkungen hat der Siegeszug des Internet auf die traditionellen Printmedien? Neuberger, C.: Das Ende des »Gatekeeper«-Zeitalters Roth, J.: Der digitale Zeitungsmarkt Lohmöller, B.: Blogs sind? Blogs sind! Lehmann, K.: Neuer Wein in neuen Schläuchen. 10 Jahre Online-Journalismus. Interview mit Markus Deggerich Wegner, J.: Die Googleisierung der Medien
  14. Mandl, T.: Tolerantes Information Retrieval : Neuronale Netze zur Erhöhung der Adaptivität und Flexibilität bei der Informationssuche (2001) 0.00 
    0.0028802026 = product of:
  0.005760405 = sum of:
    0.005760405 = product of:
      0.01152081 = sum of:
        0.01152081 = weight(_text_:data in 5965) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01152081 = score(doc=5965,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16488427 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052144732 = queryNorm
            0.0698721 = fieldWeight in 5965, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=5965)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Footnote
    Im abschließenden Kapitel des Buchs berichtet der Autor über eine Reihe von Experimenten, die im Kontext unterschiedlicher Anwendungen durchgeführt wurden. Die Evaluationen wurden sehr sorgfältig durchgeführt und werden kompetent kommentiert, so dass der Leser sich ein Bild von der Komplexität der Untersuchungen machen kann. Inhaltlich sind die Ergebnisse unterschiedlich, die Verwendung des NN-Ansatzes ist sehr abhängig von der Menge und Qualität des Trainingsmaterials (so sind die Ergebnisse auf der Cranfield-Kollektion wegen der geringen Anzahl von zur Verfügung stehenden Relevanzurteilen schlechter als die der traditionellen Verfahren). Das Experiment mit Werkstoffinformationen im Projekt WING ist eine eher traditionelle NN-Applikation: Aus Merkmalsvektoren soll auf die "Anwendungsähnlichkeit" von Werkstoffen geschlossen werden, was offenbar gut gelingt. Hier sind die konkurrierenden Verfahren aber weniger im IR zu vermuten, sondern eher im Gebiet des Data Mining. Die Versuche mit Textdaten sind Anregung, hier weitere, systematischere Untersuchungen vorzunehmen. So sollte z.B. nicht nur ein Vergleich mit klassischen One-shot IR-Verfahren durchgeführt werden, viel interessanter und aussagekräftiger ist die Gegenüberstellung von NN-Systemen und lernfähigen IR-Systemen, die z.B. über Relevance Feedback Wissen akkumulieren (vergleichbar den NN in der Trainingsphase). Am Ende könnte dann nicht nur ein einheitliches Modell stehen, sondern auch Erkenntnisse darüber, welches Lernverfahren wann vorzuziehen ist. Fazit: Das Buch ist ein hervorragendes Beispiel der "Schriften zur Informationswissenschaft", mit denen der HI (Hochschulverband für Informationswissenschaft) die Ergebnisse der informationswissenschaftlichen Forschung seit etlichen Jahren einem größerem Publikum vorstellt. Es bietet einen umfassenden Überblick zum dynamisch sich entwickelnden Gebiet der Neuronalen Netze im IR, die sich anschicken, ein "tolerantes Information Retrieval" zu ermöglichen."
  15. Lazar, J.: Web usability : a user-centered design approach (2006) 0.00 
    0.0028802026 = product of:
  0.005760405 = sum of:
    0.005760405 = product of:
      0.01152081 = sum of:
        0.01152081 = weight(_text_:data in 340) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01152081 = score(doc=340,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16488427 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052144732 = queryNorm
            0.0698721 = fieldWeight in 340, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=340)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Footnote
    Besides the major well-known software applications such as FrontPage and Dreamweaver (pp. 191-194), many useful software tools can be adopted to assist and accelerate the Web-development process, resulting in improvement of the productivity of the Web industry. Web Usability mentions such tools as the "code validator" (p. 189) to identify problematic areas of the handwritten code against spelling and usage, the tool available at a given URL address to convert portable document format (PDF) files into hypertext markup language (HTML) files (p. 201), WEBXACT, WebSAT, A-Prompt, Dottie, InFocus, and RAMP (pp. 226-227) to automate usability testing, and ClickTracks, NetTracker, WebTrends, and Spotfire (p. 263) to summarize Web-usage data and analyze the trends. Thus, Web developers are able to find these tools and benefit from them. Other strengths of the book include the layout of each page, which has a wide margin in which readers may easily place notes, and the fact that the book is easy to read and understand. Although there are many strengths in this book, a few weaknesses are evident. All chapter wrap-ups should have an identical layout. Without numbering for sections and subsections, it is very likely that readers will lose sense of where they are in the overall information architecture of the book. At present, the only solution is to frequently refer to the table of contents to confirm the location. The hands-on example on p. 39 would be better placed in chap. 4 because it focuses on a requirements gathering method, the interview. There are two similar phrases, namely "user population" and "user group," that are used widely in this book. User population is composed of user groups; however, they are not strictly used in this book. The section title "Using a Search Engine" (p. 244) should be on the same level as that of the section "Linking to a URL," and not as that of the section entitled "Marketing: Bringing Users to Your Web Site," according to what the author argued at the top of p. 236.
  16. Rogers, R.: Information politics on the Web (2004) 0.00 
    0.0028802026 = product of:
  0.005760405 = sum of:
    0.005760405 = product of:
      0.01152081 = sum of:
        0.01152081 = weight(_text_:data in 442) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01152081 = score(doc=442,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16488427 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052144732 = queryNorm
            0.0698721 = fieldWeight in 442, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=442)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Footnote
    Chapter 2 examines the politics of information retrieval in the context of collaborative filtering techniques. Rogers begins by discussing the underpinnings of modern search engine design by examining medieval practices of knowledge seeking, following up with a critique of the collaborative filtering techniques. Rogers's major contention is that collaborative filtering rids us of user idiosyncrasies as search query strings, preferences, and recommendations are shared among users and without much care for the differences among them, both in terms of their innate characteristics and also their search goals. To illustrate Rogers' critiques of collaborative filtering, he describes an information searching experiment that he conducted with students at University of Vienna and University of Amsterdam. Students were asked to search for information on Viagra. As one can imagine, depending on a number of issues, not the least of which is what sources did one extract information from, a student would find different accounts of reality about Viagra, everything from a medical drug to a black-market drug ideal for underground trade. Rogers described how information on the Web differed from official accounts for certain events. The information on the Web served as an alternative reality. Chapter 3 describes the Web as a dynamic debate-mapping tool, a political instrument. Rogers introduces the "Issue Barometer," an information instrument that measures the social pressure on a topic being debated by analyzing data available from the Web. Measures used by the Issue Barometer include temperature of the issue (cold to hot), activity level of the debate (mild to intense), and territorialization (one country to many countries). The Issues Barometer is applied to an illustrative case of the public debate surrounding food safety in the Netherlands in 2001. Chapter 4 introduces "The Web Issue Index," which provides an indication of leading societal issues discussed on the Web. The empirical research on the Web Issues Index was conducted on the Genoa G8 Summit in 1999 and the anti-globalization movement. Rogers focus here was to examine the changing nature of prominent issues over time, i.e., how issues gained and lost attention and traction over time.
  17. Fuller, M.: Media ecologies : materialist energies in art and technoculture (2005) 0.00 
    0.0028802026 = product of:
  0.005760405 = sum of:
    0.005760405 = product of:
      0.01152081 = sum of:
        0.01152081 = weight(_text_:data in 469) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01152081 = score(doc=469,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16488427 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052144732 = queryNorm
            0.0698721 = fieldWeight in 469, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=469)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Footnote
    Moving on to Web pages-Heath Bunting's cctv-world wide watch, where users watching four Webcams are encouraged to report crimes on an HTML form, which is then sent to the nearest police station-Fuller shows how cultural and technological components mesh uneasily in the project. Fuller argues that the "meme" (a kind of replicator that mutates as it passes from person to person or media to media, and works in combination with its immediate environment) or "bit" of identity constitutes a problem for surveillance. Packets of information-often the most common "meme" in Web technology-is, for Fuller, the standard object around which an ecology gets built. Networks check packets as they pass isolating passwords, URLS, credit data, and items of interest. The packet is the threshold of operations. The meme's "monitorability" enables not only dissemination through the network, but also its control. Memes, or what Fuller calls "flecks of identity" are referents in the flows of information-they "locate" and "situate" a user. Fuller's work is full of rich insights, especially into the ways in which forces of power operate within media ecologies. Even when the material/technological object, such as the camera or the Webcam turns in on itself, it is situated within a series of interrelated forces, some of which are antagonistic to the object. This insight-that contemporary media technology works within a field of antagonistic forces too-is Fuller's major contribution. Fuller is alert also to the potential within such force fields for subversion. Pirate radio and phreaking, therefore, emblematize how media ecologies create the context, possibility, and even modalities of political and social protest. Unfortunately, Fuller's style is a shade too digressive and aleatory for us to discover these insights. In his eagerness to incorporate as many theorists and philosophers of media/technology-he moves from Nietzsche to Susan Blackmore, sometimes within the space of a single paragraph-Fuller often takes a long time to get to his contribution to the debate or analysis. The problem, therefore, is mainly with style rather than content, and the arguments would have been perfectly fine if they had been couched in easier forms."
  18. Theorizing digital cultural heritage : a critical discourse (2005) 0.00 
    0.0028802026 = product of:
  0.005760405 = sum of:
    0.005760405 = product of:
      0.01152081 = sum of:
        0.01152081 = weight(_text_:data in 1929) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01152081 = score(doc=1929,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16488427 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052144732 = queryNorm
            0.0698721 = fieldWeight in 1929, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=1929)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Footnote
    The major strength of Theorizing Digital Cultural Heritage: A Critical Discourse is the balance of theory and practice achieved by its authors through the inclusion of discussion on digital culture exhibits and programs. By describing the work being done at diverse cultural institutions life is given to theoretical discussions. By relating theory to practice, the work becomes accessible to a broader range of readers. Further, these essays provide many examples of how libraries and museums could partner with each other in the realm of digital culture. The field of museum studies is dealing with the same issues as information and library science with regards to data organization, user behavior, object classification, and documentation schemas. Also, the emphasis on the users of digital cultural heritage and how individuals make meaningful connections with art, history, and geography is another asset of the book. Each chapter is well researched resulting in helpful and extensive bibliographies on various aspects of digital culture. Overall, the work is rich in discussion, description and illustrative examples that cover the subject of digital cultural heritage in terms of depth and breadth. The primary weakness of the title is on the focus on museum studies in the discourse on digital cultural heritage. There is much to be shared and discovered across other cultural institutions such as libraries and local historical societies and a more interdisciplinary approach to the essays included would have captured this. The overwhelming emphasis on museums, unfortunately, may cause some researching and studying digital cultural heritage from another perspective to overlook this work; thereby further dividing the efforts and communication of knowledge in this area. This work is highly recommended for collections on museum studies, cultural heritage, art history and documentation, library and information science, and archival science. This work would be most useful to educators and researchers interested in a theoretical understanding of cultural institutions and user interactions in view of the social and political impact of the evolving digital state of cultural heritage rather than in the specific technologies and specific user studies on the digital cultural heritage. Theorizing Digital Cultural Heritage is an insightful work that will encourage further discourse and research."

Authors

Years

Languages

Types

  • a 6982
  • m 697
  • el 511
  • s 328
  • x 63
  • r 52
  • b 39
  • i 29
  • ? 12
  • n 12
  • p 11
  • d 6
  • l 3
  • h 2
  • u 2
  • z 2
  • au 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications