Search (24 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  • × theme_ss:"Katalogfragen allgemein"
  1. Pohl, A.: OCLC, WorldCat und die Metadaten-Kontroverse (2009) 0.01 
    0.013943157 = product of:
  0.04182947 = sum of:
    0.04182947 = product of:
      0.08365894 = sum of:
        0.08365894 = weight(_text_:kritik in 2780) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08365894 = score(doc=2780,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.29538116 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.4086204 = idf(docFreq=197, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046091225 = queryNorm
            0.2832237 = fieldWeight in 2780, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.4086204 = idf(docFreq=197, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2780)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Content
    "Hintergründe Das Online Computer Library Center (OCLC) mit Sitz in Dublin (Ohio) präsentiert sich als eine Non-Profit-Mitgliederorganisation, "die sich im öffentlichen Interesse für den breiteren, computergestützten Zugang zum weltweiten Wissen und die Senkung der damit verbundenen Kosten einsetzt." Im globalen Maßstab ist OCLC die größte Organisation im Bibliothekswesen, mit knapp 70.000 Mitgliedsbibliotheken in über 100 Ländern . Das Fundament von OCLC bildet der WorldCat, dessen Konzept dem eines Verbundkatalogs entspricht: eine bibliografische Online-Datenbank für die gemeinsame Katalogisierung, in der auch die Bestandsdaten der beteiligten Bibliotheken erfasst sind. Auf dieser Datenbank baut eine große Zahl der OCLC-Dienstleistungen auf, seien dies Katalogisierungs- und Metadatendienste, Recherchewerkzeuge für Endnutzer, Fernleihdienste oder Bestandsanalyse- und -managementwerkzeuge. Für die Teilnahme am WorldCat sowie die Fremddatenübernahme aus dem WorldCat berechnet OCLC den Mitgliedsinstitutionen nicht unbeträchtliche Summen. Die Einnahmen aus WorldCat-Gebühren und Fremddatendiensten machen mehr als ein Drittel der Gesamteinnahmen OCLCs aus: Im Steuerjahr 2007/2008 betrugen die Einnahmen OCLCs aus Metadatendiensten nach Unternehmensangaben 85,8 Millionen US-$. Das sind knapp 35% der Gesamteinnahmen von 246,4 Millionen US-$ im selben Jahr.6 Man kann OCLC also ein großes finanzielles Interesse daran unterstellen, diesen Datenpool weiterhin unter eigener Kontrolle zu halten, damit die gewohnten Gewinnströme nicht versiegen. Vor diesem Hintergrund nimmt es nicht wunder, dass OCLC versucht eine Policy einzuführen, welche die Geldströme auch in Zukunft sichern soll. Mit der Ankündigung dieser rechtsverbindlichen Regelung hat OCLC Anfang November 2008 die Gemüter kritischer Bibliothekare und von Open-Data-Verfechtern erhitzt. Viele Passagen der Policy erwecken den Eindruck, dass sich OCLC ein Monopol auf die WorldCat-Daten sichern will und Konkurrenz auszuschalten versucht. Die Reaktionen - besonders in der US-amerikanischen Blogosphäre - waren harsch, wodurch bereits einige Änderungen der Policy erreicht worden sind. Mitte Januar hat OCLC nun als Erwiderung auf die vehemente Kritik den geplanten Termin des Inkrafttretens der Policy nach hinten verlegt: von Mitte Februar auf das Dritte Quartal 2009. Mit dem Review "Board of Shared Data Creation and Stewardship" hat OCLC zudem ein Gremium einberufen, das indessen mit OCLC-Mitgliedern und anderen Beteiligten in Kontakt treten soll, um den Policy-Entwurf zu überarbeiten."
  2. Lubetzky, S.: Writings on the classical art of cataloging (2001) 0.01 
    0.012489448 = product of:
  0.037468344 = sum of:
    0.037468344 = product of:
      0.07493669 = sum of:
        0.07493669 = weight(_text_:22 in 2622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07493669 = score(doc=2622,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16140361 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046091225 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2622, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2622)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Technicalities 22(2002) no.1, S.19-20 (S.S. Intner)
  3. Aliprand, J.M.: ¬The Unicode Standard : its scope, design prin. ciples, and prospects for international cataloging (2000) 0.01 
    0.010407874 = product of:
  0.031223623 = sum of:
    0.031223623 = product of:
      0.062447246 = sum of:
        0.062447246 = weight(_text_:22 in 4608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.062447246 = score(doc=4608,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16140361 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046091225 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4608, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4608)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  4. LeBlanc, J.; Kurth, M.: ¬An operational model for library metadata maintenance (2008) 0.01 
    0.008831374 = product of:
  0.026494123 = sum of:
    0.026494123 = product of:
      0.052988246 = sum of:
        0.052988246 = weight(_text_:22 in 101) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.052988246 = score(doc=101,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16140361 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046091225 = queryNorm
            0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 101, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=101)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    19. 6.2010 19:22:28
  5. El-Sherbini, M.A.: Cataloging and classification : review of the literature 2005-06 (2008) 0.01 
    0.0083262995 = product of:
  0.024978898 = sum of:
    0.024978898 = product of:
      0.049957797 = sum of:
        0.049957797 = weight(_text_:22 in 249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049957797 = score(doc=249,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16140361 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046091225 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 249, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=249)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  6. Budd, J.: Exploring categorization : undergraduate student searching and the evolution of catalogs (2007) 0.01 
    0.0083262995 = product of:
  0.024978898 = sum of:
    0.024978898 = product of:
      0.049957797 = sum of:
        0.049957797 = weight(_text_:22 in 256) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049957797 = score(doc=256,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16140361 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046091225 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 256, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=256)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  7. Miksa, S.D.: ¬The challenges of change : a review of cataloging and classification literature, 2003-2004 (2007) 0.01 
    0.0083262995 = product of:
  0.024978898 = sum of:
    0.024978898 = product of:
      0.049957797 = sum of:
        0.049957797 = weight(_text_:22 in 266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049957797 = score(doc=266,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16140361 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046091225 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 266, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=266)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  8. Schneider, R.: OPACs, Benutzer und das Web (2009) 0.01 
    0.0083262995 = product of:
  0.024978898 = sum of:
    0.024978898 = product of:
      0.049957797 = sum of:
        0.049957797 = weight(_text_:22 in 2905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049957797 = score(doc=2905,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16140361 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046091225 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2905, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2905)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    22. 2.2009 18:50:43
  9. Erdei, K.: Kein Umzug für Zettel : Die digitalisierten Kataloge im Neubau der UB Kiel (2001) 0.01 
    0.007285512 = product of:
  0.021856535 = sum of:
    0.021856535 = product of:
      0.04371307 = sum of:
        0.04371307 = weight(_text_:22 in 5777) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04371307 = score(doc=5777,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16140361 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046091225 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5777, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5777)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    28. 4.2001 16:49:22
  10. Bowman, J.H.: ¬The catalog as barrier to retrieval : Part 1: hyphens and ampersands in titles (2000) 0.01 
    0.007285512 = product of:
  0.021856535 = sum of:
    0.021856535 = product of:
      0.04371307 = sum of:
        0.04371307 = weight(_text_:22 in 5365) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04371307 = score(doc=5365,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16140361 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046091225 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5365, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5365)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    An Internet survey of 38 different OPAC systems, at eighty different libraries, was undertaken to investigate the effect on retrieval of the presence of the hyphen or the ampersand in titles. Title and Keyword searches were performed. In Title search, 22 of the systems treat the hyphen as equivalent to a space, while in Keyword the number is 16. The other systems treat it in various different ways (even including the equivalent of NOT), which means that results of searching multiple catalogs are very inconsistent. The ampersand may be ignored, treated as a special character, or treated as "and," again with very inconsistent results. Various recommendations are made with a view to improving consistency of performance.
  11. Marcum, D.B.: ¬The future of cataloging (2006) 0.01 
    0.007285512 = product of:
  0.021856535 = sum of:
    0.021856535 = product of:
      0.04371307 = sum of:
        0.04371307 = weight(_text_:22 in 114) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04371307 = score(doc=114,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16140361 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046091225 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 114, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=114)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  12. Libraries and Google (2005) 0.01 
    0.0069715786 = product of:
  0.020914735 = sum of:
    0.020914735 = product of:
      0.04182947 = sum of:
        0.04182947 = weight(_text_:kritik in 1973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04182947 = score(doc=1973,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.29538116 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.4086204 = idf(docFreq=197, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046091225 = queryNorm
            0.14161184 = fieldWeight in 1973, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.4086204 = idf(docFreq=197, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=1973)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Footnote
    Ein besonders interessanter Aufsatz widmet sich der Frage, wie Bibliotheken ihre Web-Angebote (hier: vor allem die Seiten zu digitalisierten Werken) so optimieren können, dass sie von Google und anderen Suchmaschinen optimal indexiert werden können. Dies wird leicht verständlich erklärt und dürfte für viele Bibliotheken, deren entsprechende Websites noch suboptimal gestaltet sind, eine gute Hilfestellung sein. Auch sehr praktisch orientiert ist der letzte Beitrag des Bandes, der verschiedene Quellen vorstellt, die sich mit aktuellen Entwicklungen bei Google (bzw. bei Suchmaschinen allgemein) beschäftigen, diese einzeln bewertet und Empfehlungen abgibt, welche man regelmäßig und welche man ab und zu lesen sollte. Die Bedeutung ist hier klar: Wenn Bibliotheken sich mit Google messen (oder darüber hinaus gehen?) möchten, müssen sie die Konkurrenz und ihre aktuellen Produkte kennen. Interessant wäre gewesen, noch den einen oder anderen Beitrag zu Suchprodukten von Bibliotheksseite zu lesen. Wie sollten solche Produkte beschaffen sein, um den Google-Nutzer zu den Bibliotheksangeboten zu führen? Welche Angebote gibt es hier bereits? Wie sehen die Anbieter von OPACs und Bibliothekssystemen die Zukunft der Bibliotheksrecherche? Und auch auf die nach Meinung des Rezensenten zurzeit wohl wichtigste Frage im Google-Kontext wird nicht eingegangen: Wie kann es den Bibliotheken gelingen, ein System (oder Systeme) zu schaffen, das nicht nur versucht, die Stärken der Suchmaschinen zu adaptieren, sondern ihnen einen Schritt voraus zu sein? Diese Kritik soll aber nicht darüber hinwegtäuschen, dass es sich bei dem vorliegenden Werk um eine gut lesbare Zusammenstellung von Aufsätzen handelt, die allen empfohlen werden kann, die sich einen Überblick zur Thematik verschaffen wollen, die Diskussion in den internationalen Fachzeitschriften aber nicht sowieso minutiös verfolgen."
  13. Bates, M.J.: Speculations on browsing, directed searching, and linking in relation to the Bradford distribution (2002) 0.01 
    0.006244724 = product of:
  0.018734172 = sum of:
    0.018734172 = product of:
      0.037468344 = sum of:
        0.037468344 = weight(_text_:22 in 54) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037468344 = score(doc=54,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16140361 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046091225 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 54, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=54)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    22. 2.2007 18:56:23
  14. Neubauer, W.: Von Bibliothekskatalogen zu Wissensportalen (2006) 0.01 
    0.006244724 = product of:
  0.018734172 = sum of:
    0.018734172 = product of:
      0.037468344 = sum of:
        0.037468344 = weight(_text_:22 in 1757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037468344 = score(doc=1757,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16140361 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046091225 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1757, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1757)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    22. 3.2008 12:40:17
  15. Arsenault, C.; Ménard, E.: Searching titles with initial articles in library catalogs : a case study and search behavior analysis (2007) 0.01 
    0.006244724 = product of:
  0.018734172 = sum of:
    0.018734172 = product of:
      0.037468344 = sum of:
        0.037468344 = weight(_text_:22 in 2264) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037468344 = score(doc=2264,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16140361 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046091225 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2264, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2264)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  16. Byrum, J.D.: ¬The emerging global bibliographical network : the era of international standardization in the development of cataloging policy (2000) 0.01 
    0.005203937 = product of:
  0.015611812 = sum of:
    0.015611812 = product of:
      0.031223623 = sum of:
        0.031223623 = weight(_text_:22 in 190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031223623 = score(doc=190,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16140361 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046091225 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 190, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=190)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  17. Behrens-Neumann, R.: Aus der 55. Sitzung der Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Verbundsysteme am 5. und 6. November 2008 in Frankfurt am Main (2009) 0.01 
    0.005203937 = product of:
  0.015611812 = sum of:
    0.015611812 = product of:
      0.031223623 = sum of:
        0.031223623 = weight(_text_:22 in 2778) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031223623 = score(doc=2778,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16140361 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046091225 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2778, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2778)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    22. 2.2009 19:35:56
  18. Frâncu, V.: ¬An interpretation of the FRBR model (2004) 0.00 
    0.0041631497 = product of:
  0.012489449 = sum of:
    0.012489449 = product of:
      0.024978898 = sum of:
        0.024978898 = weight(_text_:22 in 2647) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024978898 = score(doc=2647,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16140361 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046091225 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2647, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2647)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    17. 6.2015 14:40:22
  19. Scheerer, H.: Gülich online : Die Retrokonversion des Zettelkatalogs der Bundestagsbibliothek (2007) 0.00 
    0.0041631497 = product of:
  0.012489449 = sum of:
    0.012489449 = product of:
      0.024978898 = sum of:
        0.024978898 = weight(_text_:22 in 513) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024978898 = score(doc=513,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16140361 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046091225 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 513, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=513)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    22. 8.2007 11:43:43
  20. DeZelar-Tiedman, V.: Doing the LibraryThing(TM) in an academic library catalog (2008) 0.00 
    0.0041631497 = product of:
  0.012489449 = sum of:
    0.012489449 = product of:
      0.024978898 = sum of:
        0.024978898 = weight(_text_:22 in 2666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024978898 = score(doc=2666,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16140361 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046091225 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2666, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2666)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas

Authors

Languages

  • e 15
  • d 9

Types

Themes

Subjects

Classifications