Search (433 results, page 1 of 22)

  • × theme_ss:"Informationsdienstleistungen"
  1. Meier, F.: Informationsverhalten in Social Media (2015) 0.08 
    0.080486774 = product of:
  0.107315704 = sum of:
    0.07257016 = product of:
      0.14514032 = sum of:
        0.14514032 = weight(_text_:media in 1739) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14514032 = score(doc=1739,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.17529039 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037424255 = queryNorm
            0.8279993 = fieldWeight in 1739, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1739)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.02122429 = product of:
      0.04244858 = sum of:
        0.04244858 = weight(_text_:28 in 1739) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04244858 = score(doc=1739,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13406353 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037424255 = queryNorm
            0.31663033 = fieldWeight in 1739, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1739)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.013521253 = product of:
      0.04056376 = sum of:
        0.04056376 = weight(_text_:22 in 1739) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04056376 = score(doc=1739,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13105336 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037424255 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1739, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1739)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.75 = coord(3/4)
    Abstract
    Der Beitrag plädiert für Social Media (social media) als Untersuchungsgegenstand der Informationsverhaltensforschung. Dabei wird vorgestellt, welche Charakteristika mit Facebook, Twitter und Co. als Informationsquellen verbunden sind, welche Fragestellungen für die Informationsverhaltensforschung im Kontext von social media relevant sind und welche Herausforderungen bei der Untersuchung solcher Plattformen bestehen. Studien und Forschungsarbeiten zur microblogging-Plattform Twitter, werden im Zuge einer allgemeinen Argumentation als Beispiele für konkrete Forschungsinteressen herangezogen.
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 66(2015) H.1, S.22-28
  2. Coles, C.: Information seeking behaviour of public library users : use and non-use of electronic media (1999) 0.04 
    0.03659743 = product of:
  0.04879657 = sum of:
    0.0314238 = product of:
      0.0628476 = sum of:
        0.0628476 = weight(_text_:media in 286) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0628476 = score(doc=286,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.17529039 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037424255 = queryNorm
            0.35853422 = fieldWeight in 286, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=286)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.010612145 = product of:
      0.02122429 = sum of:
        0.02122429 = weight(_text_:28 in 286) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02122429 = score(doc=286,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13406353 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037424255 = queryNorm
            0.15831517 = fieldWeight in 286, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=286)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.0067606266 = product of:
      0.02028188 = sum of:
        0.02028188 = weight(_text_:22 in 286) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02028188 = score(doc=286,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13105336 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037424255 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 286, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=286)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.75 = coord(3/4)
    Abstract
    This paper highlights some of the significant findings from author's PhD: "Factors affecting the end-use of electronic databases in public libraries." Public libraries have a wide range of different types of users who, unlike academic or special library users, are not necessarily information-trained (see Coles, 1998). Whereas the academic, special library user may have specific information needs that can be met by electronic sources, public library users do not necessarily have such specific information needs that can easily be identified and met. Most user surveys have tended to concentrate on the searching and retrieval aspect of information seeking behaviour, whereas this study's user survey focused more on how people perceived and related to Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs). It was not how people searched a particular electronic source, in this case CD-ROM, that was of prime interest but rather whether or not people actually used them at all and the reasons why people did or did not use electronic media. There were several reasons the study looked at CD-ROM specifically. Firstly, CD-ROM is a well established technology, most people should be familiar with CD-ROM/multimedia. Secondly, CD-ROM was, at the start of the study, the only open access electronic media widely available in public libraries. As well as examining why public library users chose to use electronic sources, the paper looks at the types of CD-ROM databases used both in the library and in general Also examined are what sort of searches users carried out. Where appropriate some of the problems inherent in studying end-users in public libraries and the difficulty in getting reliable data, are discussed. Several methods were used to collect the data. I wished to avoid limiting research to a small sample of library sites, the aim was to be as broad in scope as possible. There were two main groups of people 1 wished to look at: non-users as well as CD-ROM users
    Date
    22. 3.2002 8:51:28
  3. Koopmans, N.I.: What's your question? : The need for research information from the perspective of different user groups (2002) 0.03 
    0.03398084 = product of:
  0.06796168 = sum of:
    0.02721381 = product of:
      0.05442762 = sum of:
        0.05442762 = weight(_text_:media in 3612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05442762 = score(doc=3612,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17529039 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037424255 = queryNorm
            0.31049973 = fieldWeight in 3612, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3612)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.040747866 = product of:
      0.061121795 = sum of:
        0.030698977 = weight(_text_:29 in 3612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030698977 = score(doc=3612,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13164683 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037424255 = queryNorm
            0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 3612, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3612)
        0.030422818 = weight(_text_:22 in 3612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030422818 = score(doc=3612,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13105336 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037424255 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3612, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3612)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    In this paper results of a field study into the need for research information of different user groups are presented: scientists, policy makers and policy researchers, industry and media. Main questions of semi-structured interviews were: what kind of research information users need, what kind of research information resources are used and which information resources are missing at the moment. User groups are missing for a diversity of reasons the overview of research, experts and institutes in the different scientific fields. Especially for the accessibility and transparency of the scientific world these overviews are reported to be needed. Neither Google nor any of the research institutes or policy research organisations are able to present surveys for different science fields at the moment. Giving users the possibility to search, browse and navigate through accessible and more specialised layers of research information might give answers to different user groups simultaneously.
    Date
    2. 7.2005 12:22:50
    Source
    Gaining insight from research information (CRIS2002): Proceedings of the 6th International Conference an Current Research Information Systems, University of Kassel, August 29 - 31, 2002. Eds: W. Adamczak u. A. Nase
  4. Poll, R.: Informationsverhalten und Informationsbedarf der Wissenschaft : Teil 1 der Nutzungsanalyse des Systems der überregionalen Literatur- und Informationsversorgung (2004) 0.03 
    0.03397178 = product of:
  0.06794356 = sum of:
    0.018571254 = product of:
      0.037142508 = sum of:
        0.037142508 = weight(_text_:28 in 2334) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037142508 = score(doc=2334,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13406353 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037424255 = queryNorm
            0.27705154 = fieldWeight in 2334, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2334)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.049372308 = product of:
      0.14811692 = sum of:
        0.14811692 = weight(_text_:ermittelt in 2334) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14811692 = score(doc=2334,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.26771787 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037424255 = queryNorm
            0.55325747 = fieldWeight in 2334, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2334)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Die Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft fördert in 23 Universitätsbibliotheken (Sondersammelgebieten), 47 Spezialbibliotheken und 3 zentralen Fachbibliotheken ein System der überregionalen Literatur- und Informationsversorgung. Dieses System kooperativer umfassender Sammlung weltweit vorhandener wissenschaftlicher Literatur sollte erstmals aus der Nutzerperspektive evaluiert werden. Es sollten Form und Umfang der tatsächlichen wie der potentiellen Nutzung sowie jetzige und zukünftige Bedarfe ermittelt werden, und zwar beispielhaft in den Fächern Anglistik, Betriebswirtschaft, Biologie, Geschichte und Maschinenbau. Das Projekt wurde 2002/2003 von der Universitäts- und Landesbibliothek Münster zusammen mit infas-Institut für angewandte Sozialwissenschaft GmbH durchgeführt. Diese Veröffentlichung zeigt den ersten Teil der Ergebnisse, die das Informationsverhalten von Wissenschaftlern und Wissenschaftlerinnen in den fünf Fächern betreffen.
    Date
    6. 6.2004 16:28:45
  5. Lercher, A.: Efficiency of scientific communication : a survey of world science (2010) 0.03 
    0.03329561 = product of:
  0.044394143 = sum of:
    0.022678176 = product of:
      0.045356352 = sum of:
        0.045356352 = weight(_text_:media in 3997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045356352 = score(doc=3997,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17529039 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037424255 = queryNorm
            0.25874978 = fieldWeight in 3997, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3997)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.013265181 = product of:
      0.026530363 = sum of:
        0.026530363 = weight(_text_:28 in 3997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026530363 = score(doc=3997,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13406353 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037424255 = queryNorm
            0.19789396 = fieldWeight in 3997, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3997)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.008450784 = product of:
      0.02535235 = sum of:
        0.02535235 = weight(_text_:22 in 3997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02535235 = score(doc=3997,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13105336 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037424255 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3997, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3997)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.75 = coord(3/4)
    Abstract
    The aim of this study was to measure the efficiency of the system by which scientists worldwide communicate results to each other, providing one measure of the degree to which the system, including all media, functions well. A randomly selected and representative sample of 246 active research scientists worldwide was surveyed. The main measure was the reported rate of "late finds": scientific literature that would have been useful to scientists' projects if it had been found at the beginning of these projects. The main result was that 46% of the sample reported late finds (±6.25%, p0.05). Among respondents from European Union countries or other countries classified as "high income" by the World Bank, 42% reported late finds. Among respondents from low- and middle-income countries, 56% reported late finds. The 42% rate in high-income countries in 2009 can be compared with results of earlier surveys by Martyn (1964a, b, 1987). These earlier surveys found a rate of 22% late finds in 1963-1964 and a rate of 27% in 1985-1986. Respondents were also queried about search habits, but this study failed to support any explanations for this increase in the rate of late finds. This study also permits a crude estimate of the cost in time and money of the increase in late finds.
    Date
    28. 9.2010 12:47:07
  6. Hartmann, K.: Fachspezifische Vermittlung von Informationskompetenz an Biologen : Überlegungen zu zukünftigen Aufgaben von Zeitungssammlungen und -abteilungen in Bibliotheken vor dem Hintergrund der Entwicklung des Mediums (2013) 0.03 
    0.029118668 = product of:
  0.058237337 = sum of:
    0.015918218 = product of:
      0.031836435 = sum of:
        0.031836435 = weight(_text_:28 in 2458) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031836435 = score(doc=2458,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13406353 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037424255 = queryNorm
            0.23747274 = fieldWeight in 2458, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2458)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.04231912 = product of:
      0.12695736 = sum of:
        0.12695736 = weight(_text_:ermittelt in 2458) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12695736 = score(doc=2458,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.26771787 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037424255 = queryNorm
            0.4742207 = fieldWeight in 2458, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2458)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Die Vermittlung von Informationskompetenz ist an vielen Hochschulbibliotheken etabliert. Dabei existieren sowohl fachübergreifende als auch fachspezifische Vermittlungskonzepte. Dieser Artikel leistet einen Beitrag zur fachspezifischen Vermittlung von Informationskompetenz an Biologen. Hierfür wurden mittels einer Umfrage die aktuellen Angebote der deutschen Hochschulbibliotheken im Fach Biologie und ihre Verankerung im Fachbereich ermittelt. Der Schwerpunkt in der Vermittlung von Informationskompetenz liegt auf den Studienanfängern. Anhaltspunkte zur Identifizierung der für die Zielgruppe der Graduierten wesentlichen Themengebiete und ihrer Recherchestrategien im Bereich Informationskompetenz liefern bereits vorhandene fachübergreifende Umfragen. Bislang waren die Biowissenschaften hierbei allerdings unterrepräsentiert. Deswegen erfolgte im Rahmen dieser Arbeit eine Befragung von Masterstudierenden und Promovierenden im Fach Biologie. Die Ergebnisse werden mit den in der Literatur verfügbaren Umfrageergebnissen verglichen, mit den aktuellen Papieren zur Informationskompetenz sowie den fachspezifischen Besonderheiten zusammengeführt und diskutiert. Zudem werden Anhaltspunkte und Ziele für die zukünftige Vermittlung von fachspezifischer Informationskompetenz an Biologen formuliert.
    Date
    17.12.2015 13:28:12
  7. Etter, Z.: Using reference questions to analyze collections and services (1995) 0.03 
    0.028754685 = product of:
  0.05750937 = sum of:
    0.03628508 = product of:
      0.07257016 = sum of:
        0.07257016 = weight(_text_:media in 3679) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07257016 = score(doc=3679,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17529039 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037424255 = queryNorm
            0.41399965 = fieldWeight in 3679, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3679)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.02122429 = product of:
      0.04244858 = sum of:
        0.04244858 = weight(_text_:28 in 3679) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04244858 = score(doc=3679,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13406353 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037424255 = queryNorm
            0.31663033 = fieldWeight in 3679, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3679)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Presents the results of an evaluation of reference enquiries and the way they were answered, undertaken at the Media Library of the Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Jersey. 197 questions were categorized as audiovisual, computer, book/journal related, or information seeking. The degree of success in answering the enquiries was analyzed and the importance of referrals estimated
    Source
    New Jersey libraries. 28(1995) no.3, S.21-23
  8. Literaturversorgung für die Wirtschaftswissenschaften : Arbeitsteilung und Kooperation zwischen der ZBW Kiel und der USB Köln (2002) 0.03 
    0.026059158 = product of:
  0.052118316 = sum of:
    0.031836435 = product of:
      0.06367287 = sum of:
        0.06367287 = weight(_text_:28 in 5498) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06367287 = score(doc=5498,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13406353 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037424255 = queryNorm
            0.4749455 = fieldWeight in 5498, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5498)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.02028188 = product of:
      0.060845636 = sum of:
        0.060845636 = weight(_text_:22 in 5498) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.060845636 = score(doc=5498,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13105336 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037424255 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 5498, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5498)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Date
    9. 7.1996 20:34:28
    21. 2.2003 14:18:22
  9. Jeevan, V.K.J.: Information drought in research : an Indian perspective (2000) 0.03 
    0.02516035 = product of:
  0.0503207 = sum of:
    0.031749446 = product of:
      0.06349889 = sum of:
        0.06349889 = weight(_text_:media in 760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06349889 = score(doc=760,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17529039 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037424255 = queryNorm
            0.3622497 = fieldWeight in 760, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=760)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.018571254 = product of:
      0.037142508 = sum of:
        0.037142508 = weight(_text_:28 in 760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037142508 = score(doc=760,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13406353 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037424255 = queryNorm
            0.27705154 = fieldWeight in 760, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=760)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    The journal subscription data of the Central Library (CL) at the Indian Institute of Technology (IIT), Kharagpur during 1995-97 is analysed to assess the prevalent information drought experienced by researchers in less developed countries. The rationale of the study, some of the myths about electronic alternatives over print media, etc. are explained. A study conducted in 1995 at the CL by gathering subscription details from other IITs to explore the options of resource sharing is extracted to present the duplication rates of costly journals. Quantification of research publications from the IIT, Kaharagpur and India are also attempted using electronic databases like CCOD and INSPEC. The budgeting pattern of CL is presented from the IIT's Annual Report. Some possible suggestions to get over the information drought are also explored.
    Date
    23. 1.2007 11:39:28
  10. Priyanto, I.F.: Developing IT-based teaching materials to enhance information skills and knowledge awareness among students (2007) 0.02 
    0.023903623 = product of:
  0.047807246 = sum of:
    0.03927975 = product of:
      0.0785595 = sum of:
        0.0785595 = weight(_text_:media in 704) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0785595 = score(doc=704,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.17529039 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037424255 = queryNorm
            0.44816777 = fieldWeight in 704, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=704)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.008527494 = product of:
      0.025582481 = sum of:
        0.025582481 = weight(_text_:29 in 704) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025582481 = score(doc=704,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13164683 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037424255 = queryNorm
            0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 704, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=704)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Changing the teaching media from chalkboard to computer-based does not only develop IT-awareness among teaching staff but also enhance their readiness to teach and quality of teaching. As a result, the students pay more attention to the lectures and in the long run students get better knowledge and understanding about the course. In the developing countries reading habit is still a practice done by quite a few people. The changing of teaching media as well as the shift from teacher-centered learning to student-centered learning has changed the way students acquire knowledge and make use of the library and multimedia facilities. Gadjah Mada University has been working hard to change the method of teaching by helping the teaching staff develop IT-based teaching materials and put them on the intranet; making teaching material databases available through the digital library; and providing easier access to the library users. In addition, IM text messaging, blogs and mailinglist have been the media to discuss and share ideas and knowledge among lecturers and students too.
    Date
    26.12.2011 13:29:37
  11. Herrmann, C.: Partikulare Konkretion universal zugänglicher Information : Beobachtungen zur Konzeptionierung fachlicher Internet-Seiten am Beispiel der Theologie (2000) 0.02 
    0.023769587 = product of:
  0.09507835 = sum of:
    0.09507835 = product of:
      0.14261752 = sum of:
        0.07163094 = weight(_text_:29 in 4364) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07163094 = score(doc=4364,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13164683 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037424255 = queryNorm
            0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 4364, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4364)
        0.07098658 = weight(_text_:22 in 4364) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07098658 = score(doc=4364,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13105336 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037424255 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4364, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4364)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    22. 1.2000 19:29:08
  12. Schmolling, R.: Neue Kommunikationsformen mit den Bibliotheksbenutzern 2.0 der Universität : Integration von Bibliotheksinformationen und Schulungsangeboten in das Kursmanagementsystem Studip (2007) 0.02 
    0.021858357 = product of:
  0.08743343 = sum of:
    0.08743343 = product of:
      0.13115014 = sum of:
        0.10579779 = weight(_text_:ermittelt in 1279) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10579779 = score(doc=1279,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.26771787 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037424255 = queryNorm
            0.3951839 = fieldWeight in 1279, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1279)
        0.02535235 = weight(_text_:22 in 1279) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02535235 = score(doc=1279,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13105336 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037424255 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1279, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1279)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    700000 Studierende aus knapp 2000 Hochschulen in Deutschland zählte die 2005 gegründete Internetplattform StudiVZ im Oktober 2006, eine Nachnutzung des amerikanischen Facebook. StudiVZ lebt von der Vernetzung, man verlinkt auf der eigenen Homepage alle Freunde mit ebenfalls eigenem Auftritt in StudiVZ. Wer eine Reise ins Ausland plant, ermittelt in der Gemeinde die zu besuchenden In-Kneipen, sucht Mitfahrgelegenheiten, tauscht sich über den Impact-Faktor eigener Hochschulprofessoren aus. Zu unterschiedlichsten Themen gibt es derzeit 50.000 Foren. Die "Bibliothekare 2.0" waren bereits aktiv, zur Themengruppe "Bibliothek" gibt es im StudiVZ allein 15 Chatgruppen mit animierenden Titeln wie "Zweitwohnsitz Uni-Bibliothek", 52 Mitglieder, "Bibliotheksconnection Jena", 7 Mitglieder sowie die bibliothekarische Unterwelt: "Manager der leisesten Clubs der Welt: die Bibliothekare, 214 Mitglieder."
    Source
    Bibliotheksdienst. 41(2007) H.1, S.22-33
  13. Dillon, M.: Assessing Information on the Internet: : Toward Providing Library Services for Computer-Mediated Communication (2001) 0.02 
    0.021792676 = product of:
  0.043585353 = sum of:
    0.026530363 = product of:
      0.053060725 = sum of:
        0.053060725 = weight(_text_:28 in 1004) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053060725 = score(doc=1004,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13406353 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037424255 = queryNorm
            0.39578792 = fieldWeight in 1004, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1004)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.017054988 = product of:
      0.051164962 = sum of:
        0.051164962 = weight(_text_:29 in 1004) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.051164962 = score(doc=1004,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13164683 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037424255 = queryNorm
            0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 1004, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1004)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Date
    6.10.2002 13:53:29
    Source
    Journal of library administration. 34(2001) nos.1/2, S.21-28
  14. Fjällbrant, N.: EDUCATE: a networked user education project in Europe (1996) 0.02 
    0.021790272 = product of:
  0.043580543 = sum of:
    0.031749446 = product of:
      0.06349889 = sum of:
        0.06349889 = weight(_text_:media in 4842) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06349889 = score(doc=4842,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17529039 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037424255 = queryNorm
            0.3622497 = fieldWeight in 4842, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4842)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.011831096 = product of:
      0.03549329 = sum of:
        0.03549329 = weight(_text_:22 in 4842) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03549329 = score(doc=4842,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13105336 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037424255 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4842, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4842)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Describes the EDUCATE (End User Courses in Information Access through Communications Technology) project for end user training in information access. EDUCATE is a Commission of the European Communities, Libraries Programme Project, involving: Limerick University, Ireland (coordinator); and the Ecole Nationale des Ponts et Chaussees, France; Chalmers University of Technology, Sweden; Imperial College, London; and Plymouth University, UK; and Barcelona University, Spain. the aim is to produce a model self paced user education course in the selection and use of information tools. Courses have been produced within physics and electric and electronic engineering. the project started in Feb 94 and will run for 3 years. Describes the course ddesign and the media developed. Discusses the use of networks in connection with EDUCATE and notes the tools and interfaces used
    Source
    IFLA journal. 22(1996) no.1, S.31-34
  15. Johnson, P.: Selecting electronic resources : developing a local decision-making matrix (1996) 0.02 
    0.021790272 = product of:
  0.043580543 = sum of:
    0.031749446 = product of:
      0.06349889 = sum of:
        0.06349889 = weight(_text_:media in 5542) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06349889 = score(doc=5542,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17529039 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037424255 = queryNorm
            0.3622497 = fieldWeight in 5542, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5542)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.011831096 = product of:
      0.03549329 = sum of:
        0.03549329 = weight(_text_:22 in 5542) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03549329 = score(doc=5542,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13105336 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037424255 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5542, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5542)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Selecting electronic resources requires both a policy statement to guide collection development and management and procedures to manage the process of selecting and handling these resources. Both policy and procedures must be crafted in response to local priorities, resources, limitations, and organizational structure. This paper examines issues that should be addressed when developing local procedures. Particular emphasis is given to preparing a mechanism to guide selection. One possible model - a decision-making matrix to guide selection between various media and modes of information delivery - is explored.
    Series
    Cataloging and classification quarterly; vol.22, nos.3/4
  16. Limberg, L.: Information seeking and learning outcomes : a study of the interaction between two phenomena (1998) 0.02 
    0.021715965 = product of:
  0.04343193 = sum of:
    0.026530363 = product of:
      0.053060725 = sum of:
        0.053060725 = weight(_text_:28 in 3684) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053060725 = score(doc=3684,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13406353 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037424255 = queryNorm
            0.39578792 = fieldWeight in 3684, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3684)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.016901568 = product of:
      0.0507047 = sum of:
        0.0507047 = weight(_text_:22 in 3684) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0507047 = score(doc=3684,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13105336 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037424255 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3684, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3684)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Date
    22. 5.1999 18:43:51
    Source
    Scandinavian public library quarterly. 31(1998) no.3, S.28-31
  17. Klein, A.; Leichtweiß, A.: Vom Quiz zur Prüfung : der Einsatz von Testverfahren bei der Vermittlung von Informationskompetenz (2009) 0.02 
    0.021715965 = product of:
  0.04343193 = sum of:
    0.026530363 = product of:
      0.053060725 = sum of:
        0.053060725 = weight(_text_:28 in 2318) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053060725 = score(doc=2318,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13406353 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037424255 = queryNorm
            0.39578792 = fieldWeight in 2318, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2318)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.016901568 = product of:
      0.0507047 = sum of:
        0.0507047 = weight(_text_:22 in 2318) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0507047 = score(doc=2318,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13105336 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037424255 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2318, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2318)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Date
    22. 8.2009 19:51:28
  18. Oh, S.; Syn, S.Y.: Motivations for sharing information and social support in social media : a comparative analysis of Facebook, Twitter, Delicious, YouTube, and Flickr (2015) 0.02 
    0.018803747 = product of:
  0.07521499 = sum of:
    0.07521499 = product of:
      0.15042998 = sum of:
        0.15042998 = weight(_text_:media in 2217) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15042998 = score(doc=2217,freq=22.0), product of:
            0.17529039 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037424255 = queryNorm
            0.8581759 = fieldWeight in 2217, product of:
              4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                22.0 = termFreq=22.0
              4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2217)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    The success or failure of social media is highly dependent on the active participation of its users. In order to examine the influential factors that inspire dynamic and eager participation, this study investigates what motivates social media users to share their personal experiences, information, and social support with anonymous others. A variety of information-sharing activities in social media, including creating postings, photos, and videos in 5 different types of social media: Facebook, Twitter, Delicious, YouTube, and Flickr, were observed. Ten factors: enjoyment, self-efficacy, learning, personal gain, altruism, empathy, social engagement, community interest, reciprocity, and reputation, were tested to identify the motivations of social media users based on reviews of major motivation theories and models. Findings from this study indicate that all of the 10 motivations are influential in encouraging users' information sharing to some degree and strongly correlate with one another. At the same time, motivations differ across the 5 types of social media, given that they deliver different information content and serve different purposes. Understanding such differences in motivations could benefit social media developers and those organizations or institutes that would like to use social media to facilitate communication among their community members; appropriate types of social media could be chosen that would fit their own purposes and they could develop strategies that would encourage their members to contribute to their communities through social media.
  19. Savolainen, R.: Source preferences in the context of seeking problem-specific information (2008) 0.02 
    0.01797168 = product of:
  0.03594336 = sum of:
    0.022678176 = product of:
      0.045356352 = sum of:
        0.045356352 = weight(_text_:media in 2034) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045356352 = score(doc=2034,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17529039 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037424255 = queryNorm
            0.25874978 = fieldWeight in 2034, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2034)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.013265181 = product of:
      0.026530363 = sum of:
        0.026530363 = weight(_text_:28 in 2034) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026530363 = score(doc=2034,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13406353 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037424255 = queryNorm
            0.19789396 = fieldWeight in 2034, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2034)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    The study focuses on the ways in which people define their source preferences in the context of seeking problem-specific information for non-work purposes. The conceptual framework draws on two major concepts, that is, information source horizon and information pathways. The former denotes the ways information sources are mapped in preference order in an imaginary field, while information pathways refers to the sequences in which sources placed on the information source horizon are actually used. The empirical part of the study draws on semi-structured interviews with 18 individuals active in environmental issues. Human sources and the Internet were preferred most strongly in seeking for problem-based information. The major source preferences were content of information, and availability and accessibility. Usability of information sources and user characteristics were mentioned less frequently as preference criteria. Typically, information pathways consisted of the use of 3-4 sources. On average, human and networked sources were favored in the early phases of information seeking. Printed media such as magazines and organizational sources were often used to complement information received from human sources and the Internet. However, the source preferences varied considerably, depending on the requirements of the problem at hand.
    Date
    28. 7.2008 15:47:54
  20. Tenopir, C.; Ennis, L.: ¬The digital reference work of academic libraries (1998) 0.02 
    0.017651476 = product of:
  0.035302952 = sum of:
    0.018571254 = product of:
      0.037142508 = sum of:
        0.037142508 = weight(_text_:28 in 5170) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037142508 = score(doc=5170,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13406353 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037424255 = queryNorm
            0.27705154 = fieldWeight in 5170, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5170)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.016731698 = product of:
      0.05019509 = sum of:
        0.05019509 = weight(_text_:22 in 5170) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05019509 = score(doc=5170,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13105336 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037424255 = queryNorm
            0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 5170, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5170)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Source
    Online. 22(1998) no.4, S.22-28

Authors

Years

Languages

Types

  • a 380
  • m 35
  • s 19
  • el 6
  • r 3
  • b 2
  • x 2
  • u 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications