Search (8066 results, page 2 of 404)

  1. Walters, W.H.: Institutional journal costs in an open access environment (2007) 0.13
    0.1285298 = product of:
      0.2570596 = sum of:
        0.13993843 = weight(_text_:open in 89) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13993843 = score(doc=89,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.20964009 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046553567 = queryNorm
            0.66751754 = fieldWeight in 89, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=89)
        0.11712117 = sum of:
          0.07927697 = weight(_text_:access in 89) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07927697 = score(doc=89,freq=10.0), product of:
              0.15778996 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046553567 = queryNorm
              0.5024209 = fieldWeight in 89, product of:
                3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                  10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=89)
          0.037844196 = weight(_text_:22 in 89) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.037844196 = score(doc=89,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16302267 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046553567 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 89, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=89)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    This study investigates the potential impact of open access pricing on institutional journal expenditures in four subject fields at nine American colleges and universities. Three pricing models are evaluated: the conventional model (the current subscription model), the PLoS open access model (based on the fees currently charged by the Public Library of Science), and the equal-revenue open access model (which maintains current levels of total aggregate spending within each subject field). Because institutional disparities in publishing productivity are far greater than institutional disparities in library holdings, the shift from a subscription-based model to either open access model would bring dramatic cost savings for most colleges and universities. At the same time, a small number of institutions-the top research universities-would pay a far higher proportion of the total aggregate cost.
    Date
    3. 3.2007 19:44:22
  2. Farazi, M.: Faceted lightweight ontologies : a formalization and some experiments (2010) 0.12
    0.12323235 = product of:
      0.2464647 = sum of:
        0.061616175 = product of:
          0.18484852 = sum of:
            0.18484852 = weight(_text_:3a in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.18484852 = score(doc=4997,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.39468166 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046553567 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.18484852 = weight(_text_:2f in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18484852 = score(doc=4997,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.39468166 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046553567 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Content
    PhD Dissertation at International Doctorate School in Information and Communication Technology. Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Fcore.ac.uk%2Fdownload%2Fpdf%2F150083013.pdf&usg=AOvVaw2n-qisNagpyT0lli_6QbAQ.
  3. Shala, E.: ¬Die Autonomie des Menschen und der Maschine : gegenwärtige Definitionen von Autonomie zwischen philosophischem Hintergrund und technologischer Umsetzbarkeit (2014) 0.12
    0.12323235 = product of:
      0.2464647 = sum of:
        0.061616175 = product of:
          0.18484852 = sum of:
            0.18484852 = weight(_text_:3a in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.18484852 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.39468166 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046553567 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.18484852 = weight(_text_:2f in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18484852 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.39468166 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046553567 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Footnote
    Vgl. unter: https://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwizweHljdbcAhVS16QKHXcFD9QQFjABegQICRAB&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.researchgate.net%2Fpublication%2F271200105_Die_Autonomie_des_Menschen_und_der_Maschine_-_gegenwartige_Definitionen_von_Autonomie_zwischen_philosophischem_Hintergrund_und_technologischer_Umsetzbarkeit_Redigierte_Version_der_Magisterarbeit_Karls&usg=AOvVaw06orrdJmFF2xbCCp_hL26q.
  4. Donsbach, W.: Wahrheit in den Medien : über den Sinn eines methodischen Objektivitätsbegriffes (2001) 0.12
    0.12323235 = product of:
      0.2464647 = sum of:
        0.061616175 = product of:
          0.18484852 = sum of:
            0.18484852 = weight(_text_:3a in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.18484852 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.39468166 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046553567 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.18484852 = weight(_text_:2f in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18484852 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.39468166 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046553567 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Source
    Politische Meinung. 381(2001) Nr.1, S.65-74 [https%3A%2F%2Fwww.dgfe.de%2Ffileadmin%2FOrdnerRedakteure%2FSektionen%2FSek02_AEW%2FKWF%2FPublikationen_Reihe_1989-2003%2FBand_17%2FBd_17_1994_355-406_A.pdf&usg=AOvVaw2KcbRsHy5UQ9QRIUyuOLNi]
  5. Malsburg, C. von der: ¬The correlation theory of brain function (1981) 0.12
    0.12323235 = product of:
      0.2464647 = sum of:
        0.061616175 = product of:
          0.18484852 = sum of:
            0.18484852 = weight(_text_:3a in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.18484852 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.39468166 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046553567 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.18484852 = weight(_text_:2f in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18484852 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.39468166 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046553567 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Source
    http%3A%2F%2Fcogprints.org%2F1380%2F1%2FvdM_correlation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0g7DvZbQPb2U7dYb49b9v_
  6. Piros, A.: Az ETO-jelzetek automatikus interpretálásának és elemzésének kérdései (2018) 0.12
    0.12323235 = product of:
      0.2464647 = sum of:
        0.061616175 = product of:
          0.18484852 = sum of:
            0.18484852 = weight(_text_:3a in 855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.18484852 = score(doc=855,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.39468166 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046553567 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 855, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=855)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.18484852 = weight(_text_:2f in 855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18484852 = score(doc=855,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.39468166 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046553567 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 855, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=855)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Content
    Vgl. auch: New automatic interpreter for complex UDC numbers. Unter: <https%3A%2F%2Fudcc.org%2Ffiles%2FAttilaPiros_EC_36-37_2014-2015.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3kc9CwDDCWP7aArpfjrs5b>
  7. Gabler, S.: Vergabe von DDC-Sachgruppen mittels eines Schlagwort-Thesaurus (2021) 0.12
    0.12323235 = product of:
      0.2464647 = sum of:
        0.061616175 = product of:
          0.18484852 = sum of:
            0.18484852 = weight(_text_:3a in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.18484852 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.39468166 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046553567 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.18484852 = weight(_text_:2f in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18484852 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.39468166 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046553567 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Content
    Master thesis Master of Science (Library and Information Studies) (MSc), Universität Wien. Advisor: Christoph Steiner. Vgl.: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/371680244_Vergabe_von_DDC-Sachgruppen_mittels_eines_Schlagwort-Thesaurus. DOI: 10.25365/thesis.70030. Vgl. dazu die Präsentation unter: https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=0CAIQw7AJahcKEwjwoZzzytz_AhUAAAAAHQAAAAAQAg&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwiki.dnb.de%2Fdownload%2Fattachments%2F252121510%2FDA3%2520Workshop-Gabler.pdf%3Fversion%3D1%26modificationDate%3D1671093170000%26api%3Dv2&psig=AOvVaw0szwENK1or3HevgvIDOfjx&ust=1687719410889597&opi=89978449.
  8. Aspöck, E.: Moving towards an open archaeology : projects, opportunities and challenges (2019) 0.12
    0.12220284 = product of:
      0.24440569 = sum of:
        0.22076985 = weight(_text_:open in 5701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.22076985 = score(doc=5701,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.20964009 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046553567 = queryNorm
            1.0530899 = fieldWeight in 5701, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5701)
        0.023635827 = product of:
          0.047271654 = sum of:
            0.047271654 = weight(_text_:access in 5701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047271654 = score(doc=5701,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15778996 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046553567 = queryNorm
                0.29958594 = fieldWeight in 5701, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5701)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Generally, open science practices are only slowly having an impact on mainstream archaeological practice. An exception is the open access to publications, which, together with open data and open methodologies may represent those practices most relevant for archaeological researchers. This article introduces a selection of archaeology projects that embrace and facilitate open science practices. Finally there will be a discussion of some of the questions and challenges the discipline is facing in its move towards an Open Archaeology.
  9. Wolf, C.: Open Access Helper : neue Funktionen kurz vorgestellt (2021) 0.12
    0.12046385 = product of:
      0.2409277 = sum of:
        0.18774709 = weight(_text_:open in 138) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18774709 = score(doc=138,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.20964009 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046553567 = queryNorm
            0.89556867 = fieldWeight in 138, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=138)
        0.05318061 = product of:
          0.10636122 = sum of:
            0.10636122 = weight(_text_:access in 138) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10636122 = score(doc=138,freq=18.0), product of:
                0.15778996 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046553567 = queryNorm
                0.67406833 = fieldWeight in 138, product of:
                  4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                    18.0 = termFreq=18.0
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=138)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Open Access Helper <https://www.oahelper.org> ist eine Browser-Erweiterung, die es Ihren Nutzern leichter machen soll, Open Access Kopien für wissenschaftliche Literatur zu finden. Dabei prüft Open Access Helper im Hintergrund anhand der ausgezeichneten APIs von unpaywall.org and core.ac.uk. Neben der Möglichkeit Open Access Kopien zu finden, hat Open Access Helper <https://www.oahelper.org> nun einen wichtigen Schritt gemacht, Ihre Nutzer noch besser zu unterstützen. Dank der Zusammenarbeit mit einer Bibliothek in Irland, kann die Erweiterung Ihre Nutzer nun besser unterstützen. Als Bibliothek können Sie für Open Access Helper Ihren* EZProxy* und/oder ein *Anfrageformular* bzw. *Link Resolver* hinterlegen. Es entstehen Ihnen und Ihren Nutzerinnen und Nutzern hierbei keine Kosten. Open Access Helper gibt es für Chrome, Firefox, Safari (macOS) und auch für iPad & iPhone. Download Links finden Sie unter https://www.oahelper.org oder über eine Such im App / Extension Store Ihrer Wahl. Weitere Informationen finden Sie unter https://www.oahelper.org.
    Object
    Open Access Helper
  10. Huo, W.: Automatic multi-word term extraction and its application to Web-page summarization (2012) 0.12
    0.12037015 = product of:
      0.2407403 = sum of:
        0.22181821 = weight(_text_:2f in 563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.22181821 = score(doc=563,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.39468166 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046553567 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 563, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=563)
        0.018922098 = product of:
          0.037844196 = sum of:
            0.037844196 = weight(_text_:22 in 563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037844196 = score(doc=563,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16302267 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046553567 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 563, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=563)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Content
    A Thesis presented to The University of Guelph In partial fulfilment of requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Computer Science. Vgl. Unter: http://www.inf.ufrgs.br%2F~ceramisch%2Fdownload_files%2Fpublications%2F2009%2Fp01.pdf.
    Date
    10. 1.2013 19:22:47
  11. Saffady, W.: ¬The bibliographic utilities in 1993 : a survey of cataloging support and other services; the bibliographic utilities, an overview (1993) 0.12
    0.117658794 = product of:
      0.23531759 = sum of:
        0.118006445 = weight(_text_:open in 3089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.118006445 = score(doc=3089,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.20964009 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046553567 = queryNorm
            0.5629002 = fieldWeight in 3089, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3089)
        0.117311135 = sum of:
          0.06685221 = weight(_text_:access in 3089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06685221 = score(doc=3089,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.15778996 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046553567 = queryNorm
              0.4236785 = fieldWeight in 3089, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3089)
          0.050458927 = weight(_text_:22 in 3089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.050458927 = score(doc=3089,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16302267 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046553567 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3089, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3089)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Defines bibliographic utilities. The databases maintained by most bibliographic utilities are essentially online union catalogues. Describes 7 organisations that offer online, timeshared cataloguing support services in North America: OCLC; RLIN; the Western Library Network (WLN); Utlas; the AGILE 3 system; the Interactive Access System; and Open DRANET. Discusses equipment and communications; database characteristics; record retrieval; cataloguing support; output products; related products and services; and utilities versus CD-ROM
    Date
    30.11.1995 20:53:22
    Object
    Interactive Access System
    Open DRANET
  12. Wissenschaftler fordern 'Open Access' : Berliner Erklärung (2003) 0.12
    0.117658794 = product of:
      0.23531759 = sum of:
        0.118006445 = weight(_text_:open in 2013) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.118006445 = score(doc=2013,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.20964009 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046553567 = queryNorm
            0.5629002 = fieldWeight in 2013, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2013)
        0.117311135 = sum of:
          0.06685221 = weight(_text_:access in 2013) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06685221 = score(doc=2013,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.15778996 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046553567 = queryNorm
              0.4236785 = fieldWeight in 2013, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2013)
          0.050458927 = weight(_text_:22 in 2013) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.050458927 = score(doc=2013,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16302267 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046553567 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2013, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2013)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Gemeinsam mit den Repräsentanten der großen deutschen und internationalen Wissenschaftsorganisationen hat Prof. Peter Gruss, der Präsident der Max-Planck-Gesellschaft, am 22. Oktober die folgende »Berliner Erklärung über offenen Zugang zu wissenschaftlichem Wissen« (Berlin Declaration an Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities) unterzeichnet. Vorausgegangen war eine dreitägige Konferenz in Berlin. Dabei diskutierten international führende Experten über neue Zugangsmöglichkeiten zu wissenschaftlichem Wissen und kulturellem Erbe durch das Internet.
  13. Krüger, N.; Pianos, T.: Lernmaterialien für junge Forschende in den Wirtschaftswissenschaften als Open Educational Resources (OER) (2021) 0.12
    0.11576989 = product of:
      0.23153979 = sum of:
        0.14602552 = weight(_text_:open in 252) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14602552 = score(doc=252,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.20964009 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046553567 = queryNorm
            0.6965534 = fieldWeight in 252, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=252)
        0.08551426 = sum of:
          0.0413627 = weight(_text_:access in 252) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0413627 = score(doc=252,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15778996 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046553567 = queryNorm
              0.2621377 = fieldWeight in 252, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=252)
          0.04415156 = weight(_text_:22 in 252) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04415156 = score(doc=252,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16302267 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046553567 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 252, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=252)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Das EconBiz Academic Career Kit ist ein interaktives Online-Tutorial für den wissenschaftlichen Nachwuchs in den Wirtschaftswissenschaften. In drei Modulen geht es um die Themen: erste Veröffentlichung, Open Access, Predatory Journals und Urheberrecht - Wissenschaftskommunikation, kollaboratives Arbeiten, Networking und Metriken - Forschungsdatenmanagement. Angebote der Vermittlung von Informationskompetenz sind in diesen Feldern und für diese Zielgruppe in Deutschland noch nicht flächendeckend verbreitet. Darum - und weil Forschende sich zu diesen Fragen meist im Netz informieren - ist das Academic Career Kit als OER unter der Lizenz CC-BY veröffentlicht und damit zur Bearbeitung und Weiterverwendung durch Dritte freigegeben.
    Content
    Teil 1 in: Open Password. 2021, Nr.920 vom 10.05.2021.
    Date
    22. 5.2021 12:43:05
    Source
    Open Password. 2021, Nr.935 vom 16.06.2021 [https://www.password-online.de/?mailpoet_router&endpoint=view_in_browser&action=view&data=WzMwNSwiMjNiZDFkOWY4Nzg5IiwwLDAsMjc1LDFd]
  14. Open initiatives : Offenheit in der digitalen Welt und Wissenschaft (2012) 0.12
    0.11567846 = product of:
      0.23135692 = sum of:
        0.20008966 = weight(_text_:open in 567) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.20008966 = score(doc=567,freq=46.0), product of:
            0.20964009 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046553567 = queryNorm
            0.9544437 = fieldWeight in 567, product of:
              6.78233 = tf(freq=46.0), with freq of:
                46.0 = termFreq=46.0
              4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=567)
        0.03126726 = product of:
          0.06253452 = sum of:
            0.06253452 = weight(_text_:access in 567) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06253452 = score(doc=567,freq=14.0), product of:
                0.15778996 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046553567 = queryNorm
                0.39631495 = fieldWeight in 567, product of:
                  3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                    14.0 = termFreq=14.0
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=567)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Initiativen, die Transparenz, offenen und möglichst einfachen Zugang zu Informationen, etwa in Wissenschaft und Verwaltung fordern und herstellen, gewinnen rasant an Bedeutung und beginnen sich immer weiter zu differenzieren. Die Forderungen reichen von freiem (im Sinne von kostenlosem) Zugang zu Informationen bis hin zu offenem Zugang analog den Prinzipien der Open Source Community. Manche Initiativen und Phänomene fokussieren stärker auf Transparenz als auf Offenheit, wie z.B. die Whistleblower-Plattform Wikileaks, während wiederum andere (z.B. Open Government oder Open Access zu Forschungsdaten) die Forderungen nach Transparenz und Offenheit kombinieren oder sich an der Bereitstellung nicht-proprietärer Informationen versuchen (wie das Geodaten-Projekt OpenStreetMap oder die Open Metrics Konzepte im Wissenschaftskontext). Zwölf Autorinnen und Autoren aus Open Data Projekten und aus den Bereichen Open Access, Open Science, Journalismus und Recht beschreiben und analysieren die besagten und andere Open Initiatives, diskutieren deren Gemeinsamkeiten und Grenzen sowie radikale Offenheitskonzepte wie WikiLeaks und Anonymous.
    Content
    Inhalt: Offenheit und wissenschaftliche Werke: Open Access, Open Review, Open Metrics, Open Science & Open Knowledge - Ulrich Herb Offener Zugang zu Forschungsdaten - Jens Klump Wissenschaft zum Mitmachen, Wissenschaft als Prozess: Offene Wissenschaft - Daniel Mietchen Open Access hinter verschlossenen Türen oder wie sich Open Access im und mit dem Entwicklungsdiskurs arrangiert - Jutta Haider The European sciences: How "open" are they for women? - Terje Tüür-Fröhlich Wie erwirbt der Mensch Wissen, wie wendet er es an und wie behandelt das Recht diesen Vorgang? - Eckhard Höjfner Collateral Copyright: Modularisierte Urheberrechtsfreigaben für die Wissenschaft - John Hendrik Weitzmann Open Data - Am Beispiel von Informationen des öffentlichen Sektors - Nils Barnickel, Jens Kiessmann Offene Geodäten durch OpenStreetMap - Roland Ramthun Wikileaks und das Ideal der Öffentlichkeit - Christiane Schulzki-Haddouti Open Collectivity - Carolin Wiedemann
    RSWK
    Open Archives Initiative
    Open Access
    Subject
    Open Archives Initiative
    Open Access
  15. Riehm, U.; Nentwich, M.: Open Science aus Perspektive der Technikfolgenabschätzung : zu Begriff, gesellschaftlicher Einbettung und möglichen Entwicklungen eines ubiquitären Konzepts (2017) 0.11
    0.11359632 = product of:
      0.22719264 = sum of:
        0.20651129 = weight(_text_:open in 3778) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.20651129 = score(doc=3778,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.20964009 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046553567 = queryNorm
            0.98507535 = fieldWeight in 3778, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3778)
        0.02068135 = product of:
          0.0413627 = sum of:
            0.0413627 = weight(_text_:access in 3778) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0413627 = score(doc=3778,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15778996 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046553567 = queryNorm
                0.2621377 = fieldWeight in 3778, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3778)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Dieser Beitrag nähert sich dem Thema Open Science aus der Perspektive der konzeptionellen Vorbereitung einer umfassenden Technikfolgenabschätzungsstudie. Es werden vier Dimensionen des Konzepts der Offenheit von Wissenschaft unterschieden: freier Zugang, öffentliche Kommunikation, offene Kooperation und die Überwindung gesellschaftlicher Subsysteme. Es wird des Weiteren eine sinnvolle Abgrenzung des Untersuchungsgegenstandes Open Science vorgeschlagen, die bei einer TA-Studie berücksichtigt werden müsste. Nach einer kurzen Darstellung des Status Quo für drei typische Konkretisierungen von Open Science (Open Access, Open-Peer-Review, Wissenschaftsnetzwerke) werden vier Szenarien der zukünftigen Entwicklung von Open Science zur Diskussion gestellt.
    Footnote
    Beitrag innerhalb eines Themenheftes "Open Science - zwischen Hype und Disruption".
  16. Vogt, T.; Botz, G.W.: Open Access - schöne neue Welt? : Ein Interview mit Georg W. Botz, Koordinator der Open Access Poliy der Max-Planck-Gesellschaft (2013) 0.11
    0.113574415 = product of:
      0.22714883 = sum of:
        0.17700967 = weight(_text_:open in 794) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17700967 = score(doc=794,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.20964009 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046553567 = queryNorm
            0.8443503 = fieldWeight in 794, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=794)
        0.05013916 = product of:
          0.10027832 = sum of:
            0.10027832 = weight(_text_:access in 794) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10027832 = score(doc=794,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15778996 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046553567 = queryNorm
                0.6355177 = fieldWeight in 794, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=794)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
  17. Herb, U.: Wie teuer muss Open Access sein? (2016) 0.11
    0.113574415 = product of:
      0.22714883 = sum of:
        0.17700967 = weight(_text_:open in 2620) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17700967 = score(doc=2620,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.20964009 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046553567 = queryNorm
            0.8443503 = fieldWeight in 2620, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2620)
        0.05013916 = product of:
          0.10027832 = sum of:
            0.10027832 = weight(_text_:access in 2620) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10027832 = score(doc=2620,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15778996 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046553567 = queryNorm
                0.6355177 = fieldWeight in 2620, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2620)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Neuartige Workflow-Software für Open-Access-Journale verfügbar.
  18. Herb, U.: Open Access unter Ausschluss der Öffentlichkeit? (2016) 0.11
    0.113574415 = product of:
      0.22714883 = sum of:
        0.17700967 = weight(_text_:open in 2621) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17700967 = score(doc=2621,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.20964009 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046553567 = queryNorm
            0.8443503 = fieldWeight in 2621, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2621)
        0.05013916 = product of:
          0.10027832 = sum of:
            0.10027832 = weight(_text_:access in 2621) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10027832 = score(doc=2621,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15778996 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046553567 = queryNorm
                0.6355177 = fieldWeight in 2621, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2621)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Die idealistische Open-Access-Romantik tritt zusehends in den Hintergrund, heute geht es wieder um Geschäftsmodelle.
  19. Jochum, U.: Digitale Wissenschaftskontrolle (2016) 0.11
    0.113574415 = product of:
      0.22714883 = sum of:
        0.17700967 = weight(_text_:open in 3257) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17700967 = score(doc=3257,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.20964009 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046553567 = queryNorm
            0.8443503 = fieldWeight in 3257, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3257)
        0.05013916 = product of:
          0.10027832 = sum of:
            0.10027832 = weight(_text_:access in 3257) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10027832 = score(doc=3257,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15778996 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046553567 = queryNorm
                0.6355177 = fieldWeight in 3257, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3257)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Open Access läuft auf ein Kontrollsystem hinaus, das jeden Schritt von Wissenschaftlern überwacht. Die Politik verschenkt die Arbeit der Forscher an private Investoren.
    Source
    http://www.faz.net/aktuell/feuilleton/debatten/open-access-publikationssystem-laeuft-auf-kontrollsystem-aus-14538833.html
  20. Herb, U.: Rettet der Plan S den Open Access? (2018) 0.11
    0.113574415 = product of:
      0.22714883 = sum of:
        0.17700967 = weight(_text_:open in 4323) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17700967 = score(doc=4323,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.20964009 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046553567 = queryNorm
            0.8443503 = fieldWeight in 4323, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4323)
        0.05013916 = product of:
          0.10027832 = sum of:
            0.10027832 = weight(_text_:access in 4323) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10027832 = score(doc=4323,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15778996 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046553567 = queryNorm
                0.6355177 = fieldWeight in 4323, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4323)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Source
    https://www.heise.de/tp/features/Rettet-der-Plan-S-den-Open-Access-4154033.html?wt_mc=nl.tp-aktuell.woechentlich

Authors

Languages

Types

Themes

Subjects

Classifications