Search (198 results, page 1 of 10)

  • × year_i:[2020 TO 2030}
  1. Griesbaum, J.; Çetta, D.: What is information literacy and how to improve it? (2021) 0.08
    0.0822789 = product of:
      0.123418346 = sum of:
        0.11172037 = weight(_text_:120 in 201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11172037 = score(doc=201,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.26851514 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.2763524 = idf(docFreq=225, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04278204 = queryNorm
            0.4160673 = fieldWeight in 201, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.2763524 = idf(docFreq=225, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=201)
        0.0116979815 = product of:
          0.035093945 = sum of:
            0.035093945 = weight(_text_:29 in 201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035093945 = score(doc=201,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15049383 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04278204 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 201, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=201)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Date
    29. 3.2021 18:55:14
    Footnote
    Mit ihrem Vortrag »What is Information Literacy and how to improve it?« eröffnete Daphné Çetta die erste Session zur ISI 2021 zum Thema "Information Behavior and Literacy I". Das Plenum fasste rund 120 Teilnehmer*innen.
  2. Hjoerland, B.: Table of contents (ToC) (2022) 0.07
    0.06850729 = product of:
      0.10276093 = sum of:
        0.09310031 = weight(_text_:120 in 1096) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09310031 = score(doc=1096,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.26851514 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.2763524 = idf(docFreq=225, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04278204 = queryNorm
            0.34672275 = fieldWeight in 1096, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.2763524 = idf(docFreq=225, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1096)
        0.009660627 = product of:
          0.02898188 = sum of:
            0.02898188 = weight(_text_:22 in 1096) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02898188 = score(doc=1096,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14981541 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04278204 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1096, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1096)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Date
    18.11.2023 13:47:22
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 49(2022) no.2, S.98 - 120
  3. Cole, C.: ¬A rebuttal of the book review of the book titled "The Consciousness' Drive: Information Need and the Search for Meaning" : mapping cognitive and document spaces (2020) 0.06
    0.062066875 = product of:
      0.18620062 = sum of:
        0.18620062 = weight(_text_:120 in 5656) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18620062 = score(doc=5656,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.26851514 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.2763524 = idf(docFreq=225, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04278204 = queryNorm
            0.6934455 = fieldWeight in 5656, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.2763524 = idf(docFreq=225, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5656)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Content
    Vgl. die Rezension in: JASIST 71(2020) no.1, S.118-120 (Heidi Julien).
  4. Expertenteams RDA-Anwendungsprofil für die verbale Inhaltserschließung (ET RAVI): Qualitätskriterien und Qualitätssicherung in der inhaltlichen Erschließung : Thesenpapier (2021) 0.05
    0.049653497 = product of:
      0.14896049 = sum of:
        0.14896049 = weight(_text_:120 in 364) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14896049 = score(doc=364,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.26851514 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.2763524 = idf(docFreq=225, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04278204 = queryNorm
            0.5547564 = fieldWeight in 364, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.2763524 = idf(docFreq=225, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=364)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Pages
    S.113-120
  5. Dietz, K.: en.wikipedia.org > 6 Mio. Artikel (2020) 0.04
    0.044248447 = product of:
      0.06637267 = sum of:
        0.05662435 = product of:
          0.16987304 = sum of:
            0.16987304 = weight(_text_:3a in 5669) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.16987304 = score(doc=5669,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3627066 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04278204 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5669, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5669)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.009748319 = product of:
          0.029244956 = sum of:
            0.029244956 = weight(_text_:29 in 5669) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029244956 = score(doc=5669,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15049383 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04278204 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 5669, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5669)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Content
    "Die Englischsprachige Wikipedia verfügt jetzt über mehr als 6 Millionen Artikel. An zweiter Stelle kommt die deutschsprachige Wikipedia mit 2.3 Millionen Artikeln, an dritter Stelle steht die französischsprachige Wikipedia mit 2.1 Millionen Artikeln (via Researchbuzz: Firehose <https://rbfirehose.com/2020/01/24/techcrunch-wikipedia-now-has-more-than-6-million-articles-in-english/> und Techcrunch <https://techcrunch.com/2020/01/23/wikipedia-english-six-million-articles/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Techcrunch+%28TechCrunch%29&guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly9yYmZpcmVob3NlLmNvbS8yMDIwLzAxLzI0L3RlY2hjcnVuY2gtd2lraXBlZGlhLW5vdy1oYXMtbW9yZS10aGFuLTYtbWlsbGlvbi1hcnRpY2xlcy1pbi1lbmdsaXNoLw&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAK0zHfjdDZ_spFZBF_z-zDjtL5iWvuKDumFTzm4HvQzkUfE2pLXQzGS6FGB_y-VISdMEsUSvkNsg2U_NWQ4lwWSvOo3jvXo1I3GtgHpP8exukVxYAnn5mJspqX50VHIWFADHhs5AerkRn3hMRtf_R3F1qmEbo8EROZXp328HMC-o>). 250120 via digithek ch = #fineBlog s.a.: Angesichts der Veröffentlichung des 6-millionsten Artikels vergangene Woche in der englischsprachigen Wikipedia hat die Community-Zeitungsseite "Wikipedia Signpost" ein Moratorium bei der Veröffentlichung von Unternehmensartikeln gefordert. Das sei kein Vorwurf gegen die Wikimedia Foundation, aber die derzeitigen Maßnahmen, um die Enzyklopädie gegen missbräuchliches undeklariertes Paid Editing zu schützen, funktionierten ganz klar nicht. *"Da die ehrenamtlichen Autoren derzeit von Werbung in Gestalt von Wikipedia-Artikeln überwältigt werden, und da die WMF nicht in der Lage zu sein scheint, dem irgendetwas entgegenzusetzen, wäre der einzige gangbare Weg für die Autoren, fürs erste die Neuanlage von Artikeln über Unternehmen zu untersagen"*, schreibt der Benutzer Smallbones in seinem Editorial <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2020-01-27/From_the_editor> zur heutigen Ausgabe."
  6. Cabanac, G.; Labbé, C.: Prevalence of nonsensical algorithmically generated papers in the scientific literature (2021) 0.03
    0.031033438 = product of:
      0.09310031 = sum of:
        0.09310031 = weight(_text_:120 in 410) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09310031 = score(doc=410,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.26851514 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.2763524 = idf(docFreq=225, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04278204 = queryNorm
            0.34672275 = fieldWeight in 410, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.2763524 = idf(docFreq=225, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=410)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    In 2014 leading publishers withdrew more than 120 nonsensical publications automatically generated with the SCIgen program. Casual observations suggested that similar problematic papers are still published and sold, without follow-up retractions. No systematic screening has been performed and the prevalence of such nonsensical publications in the scientific literature is unknown. Our contribution is 2-fold. First, we designed a detector that combs the scientific literature for grammar-based computer-generated papers. Applied to SCIgen, it has a 83.6% precision. Second, we performed a scientometric study of the 243 detected SCIgen-papers from 19 publishers. We estimate the prevalence of SCIgen-papers to be 75 per million papers in Information and Computing Sciences. Only 19% of the 243 problematic papers were dealt with: formal retraction (12) or silent removal (34). Publishers still serve and sometimes sell the remaining 197 papers without any caveat. We found evidence of citation manipulation via edited SCIgen bibliographies. This work reveals metric gaming up to the point of absurdity: fraudsters publish nonsensical algorithmically generated papers featuring genuine references. It stresses the need to screen papers for nonsense before peer-review and chase citation manipulation in published papers. Overall, this is yet another illustration of the harmful effects of the pressure to publish or perish.
  7. Cocq, C.: Revisiting the digital humanities through the lens of Indigenous studies : or how to question the cultural blindness of our technologies and practices (2022) 0.03
    0.031033438 = product of:
      0.09310031 = sum of:
        0.09310031 = weight(_text_:120 in 470) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09310031 = score(doc=470,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.26851514 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.2763524 = idf(docFreq=225, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04278204 = queryNorm
            0.34672275 = fieldWeight in 470, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.2763524 = idf(docFreq=225, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=470)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    This article examines the benefits of putting Indigenous perspectives and the digital humanities (DH) in conversation with each other in order to elaborate a DH approach that is suitable for Indigenous research and to suggest critical perspectives for a more sustainable DH. For this purpose, the article examines practices of data harvesting, categorizing, and sharing from the perspectives of groups in the margin, more specifically in relation to Sámi research. Previous research has emphasized the role of cultural and social contexts in the design, use, and adaptation of technologies in general, and digital technologies in particular (Douglas, 1987. Inventing American broadcasting; Nissenbaum, 2001. Computer, 34, 118-120; Powell & Aitken, 2011. The American literature scholar in the digital age) and several scholars have argued for how the application of critical studies make a fruitful contribution to the DH (Liu, 2012. Debates in the digital humanities; McPherson, 2012. Debates in the digital humanities). This article suggests an approach that addresses a need to acknowledge the diversity of technoscientific traditions. The perspectives of Indigenous groups bring this matter to a head. In order to make the DH more sustainable and inclusive, the development of the DH should be driven by cultural studies to a greater extent than it has been so far. A sustainable DH also means a better rendering of the plurality of the cultural values, perspectives, and ethics that characterize our fieldwork and research subjects.
  8. Noever, D.; Ciolino, M.: ¬The Turing deception (2022) 0.02
    0.02264974 = product of:
      0.06794922 = sum of:
        0.06794922 = product of:
          0.20384765 = sum of:
            0.20384765 = weight(_text_:3a in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.20384765 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3627066 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04278204 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    https%3A%2F%2Farxiv.org%2Fabs%2F2212.06721&usg=AOvVaw3i_9pZm9y_dQWoHi6uv0EN
  9. Gabler, S.: Vergabe von DDC-Sachgruppen mittels eines Schlagwort-Thesaurus (2021) 0.02
    0.018874783 = product of:
      0.05662435 = sum of:
        0.05662435 = product of:
          0.16987304 = sum of:
            0.16987304 = weight(_text_:3a in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.16987304 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3627066 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04278204 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Content
    Master thesis Master of Science (Library and Information Studies) (MSc), Universität Wien. Advisor: Christoph Steiner. Vgl.: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/371680244_Vergabe_von_DDC-Sachgruppen_mittels_eines_Schlagwort-Thesaurus. DOI: 10.25365/thesis.70030. Vgl. dazu die Präsentation unter: https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=0CAIQw7AJahcKEwjwoZzzytz_AhUAAAAAHQAAAAAQAg&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwiki.dnb.de%2Fdownload%2Fattachments%2F252121510%2FDA3%2520Workshop-Gabler.pdf%3Fversion%3D1%26modificationDate%3D1671093170000%26api%3Dv2&psig=AOvVaw0szwENK1or3HevgvIDOfjx&ust=1687719410889597&opi=89978449.
  10. Bärnreuther, K.: Informationskompetenz-Vermittlung für Schulklassen mit Wikipedia und dem Framework Informationskompetenz in der Hochschulbildung (2021) 0.02
    0.015527157 = product of:
      0.04658147 = sum of:
        0.04658147 = product of:
          0.0698722 = sum of:
            0.035093945 = weight(_text_:29 in 299) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035093945 = score(doc=299,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15049383 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04278204 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 299, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=299)
            0.034778252 = weight(_text_:22 in 299) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.034778252 = score(doc=299,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14981541 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04278204 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 299, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=299)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    30. 6.2021 16:29:52
    Source
    o-bib: Das offene Bibliotheksjournal. 8(2021) Nr.2, S.1-22
  11. Hertzum, M.: Information seeking by experimentation : trying something out to discover what happens (2023) 0.02
    0.015527157 = product of:
      0.04658147 = sum of:
        0.04658147 = product of:
          0.0698722 = sum of:
            0.035093945 = weight(_text_:29 in 915) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035093945 = score(doc=915,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15049383 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04278204 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 915, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=915)
            0.034778252 = weight(_text_:22 in 915) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.034778252 = score(doc=915,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14981541 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04278204 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 915, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=915)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    21. 3.2023 19:22:29
  12. Thelwall, M.; Thelwall, S.: ¬A thematic analysis of highly retweeted early COVID-19 tweets : consensus, information, dissent and lockdown life (2020) 0.01
    0.012939297 = product of:
      0.03881789 = sum of:
        0.03881789 = product of:
          0.058226835 = sum of:
            0.029244956 = weight(_text_:29 in 178) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029244956 = score(doc=178,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15049383 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04278204 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 178, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=178)
            0.02898188 = weight(_text_:22 in 178) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02898188 = score(doc=178,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14981541 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04278204 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 178, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=178)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose Public attitudes towards COVID-19 and social distancing are critical in reducing its spread. It is therefore important to understand public reactions and information dissemination in all major forms, including on social media. This article investigates important issues reflected on Twitter in the early stages of the public reaction to COVID-19. Design/methodology/approach A thematic analysis of the most retweeted English-language tweets mentioning COVID-19 during March 10-29, 2020. Findings The main themes identified for the 87 qualifying tweets accounting for 14 million retweets were: lockdown life; attitude towards social restrictions; politics; safety messages; people with COVID-19; support for key workers; work; and COVID-19 facts/news. Research limitations/implications Twitter played many positive roles, mainly through unofficial tweets. Users shared social distancing information, helped build support for social distancing, criticised government responses, expressed support for key workers and helped each other cope with social isolation. A few popular tweets not supporting social distancing show that government messages sometimes failed. Practical implications Public health campaigns in future may consider encouraging grass roots social web activity to support campaign goals. At a methodological level, analysing retweet counts emphasised politics and ignored practical implementation issues. Originality/value This is the first qualitative analysis of general COVID-19-related retweeting.
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  13. Barité, M.; Parentelli, V.; Rodríguez Casaballe, N.; Suárez, M.V.: Interdisciplinarity and postgraduate teaching of knowledge organization (KO) : elements for a necessary dialogue (2023) 0.01
    0.012939297 = product of:
      0.03881789 = sum of:
        0.03881789 = product of:
          0.058226835 = sum of:
            0.029244956 = weight(_text_:29 in 1125) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029244956 = score(doc=1125,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15049383 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04278204 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 1125, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1125)
            0.02898188 = weight(_text_:22 in 1125) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02898188 = score(doc=1125,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14981541 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04278204 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1125, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1125)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Interdisciplinarity implies the previous existence of disciplinary fields and not their dissolution. As a general objective, we propose to establish an initial approach to the emphasis given to interdisciplinarity in the teaching of KO, through the teaching staff responsible for postgraduate courses focused on -or related to the KO, in Ibero-American universities. For conducting the research, the framework and distribution of a survey addressed to teachers is proposed, based on four lines of action: 1. The way teachers manage the concept of interdisciplinarity. 2. The place that teachers give to interdisciplinarity in KO. 3. Assessment of interdisciplinary content that teachers incorporate into their postgraduate courses. 4. Set of teaching strategies and resources used by teachers to include interdisciplinarity in the teaching of KO. The study analyzed 22 responses. Preliminary results show that KO teachers recognize the influence of other disciplines in concepts, theories, methods, and applications, but no consensus has been reached regarding which disciplines and authors are the ones who build interdisciplinary bridges. Among other conclusions, the study strongly suggests that environmental and social tensions are reflected in subject representation, especially in the construction of friendly knowl­edge organization systems with interdisciplinary visions, and in the expressions through which information is sought.
    Date
    20.11.2023 17:29:13
  14. Barthel, J.; Ciesielski, R.: Regeln zu ChatGPT an Unis oft unklar : KI in der Bildung (2023) 0.01
    0.011256389 = product of:
      0.033769168 = sum of:
        0.033769168 = product of:
          0.1013075 = sum of:
            0.1013075 = weight(_text_:29 in 925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1013075 = score(doc=925,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.15049383 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04278204 = queryNorm
                0.6731671 = fieldWeight in 925, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=925)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    29. 3.2023 13:23:26
    29. 3.2023 13:29:19
  15. ¬Der Student aus dem Computer (2023) 0.01
    0.009016585 = product of:
      0.027049754 = sum of:
        0.027049754 = product of:
          0.08114926 = sum of:
            0.08114926 = weight(_text_:22 in 1079) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08114926 = score(doc=1079,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14981541 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04278204 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1079, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1079)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    27. 1.2023 16:22:55
  16. Hobohm, H.-C.: Zensur in der Digitalität - eine Überwindung der Moderne? : Die Rolle der Bibliotheken (2020) 0.01
    0.0077986545 = product of:
      0.023395963 = sum of:
        0.023395963 = product of:
          0.07018789 = sum of:
            0.07018789 = weight(_text_:29 in 5371) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07018789 = score(doc=5371,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15049383 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04278204 = queryNorm
                0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 5371, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5371)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Content
    Beitrag zur Tagung: "Nationalsozialismus Digital. Die Verantwortung von Bibliotheken, Archiven und Museen sowie Forschungseinrichtungen und Medien im Umgang mit der NSZeit im Netz." Österreichische Nationalbibliothek, Universität Wien, 27. - 29. November 2019
  17. Springer, M.: Ewiges Wachstum (2020) 0.01
    0.0077986545 = product of:
      0.023395963 = sum of:
        0.023395963 = product of:
          0.07018789 = sum of:
            0.07018789 = weight(_text_:29 in 5742) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07018789 = score(doc=5742,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15049383 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04278204 = queryNorm
                0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 5742, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5742)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Spektrum der Wissenschaft. 2020, H.3, S.29
  18. Springer, M.: Schwarzer Schwan im Internet (2020) 0.01
    0.0077986545 = product of:
      0.023395963 = sum of:
        0.023395963 = product of:
          0.07018789 = sum of:
            0.07018789 = weight(_text_:29 in 5903) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07018789 = score(doc=5903,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15049383 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04278204 = queryNorm
                0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 5903, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5903)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Spektrum der Wissenschaft. 2020, H.7, S.29
  19. Müller, P.: Text-Automat mit Tücken (2023) 0.01
    0.0077986545 = product of:
      0.023395963 = sum of:
        0.023395963 = product of:
          0.07018789 = sum of:
            0.07018789 = weight(_text_:29 in 481) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07018789 = score(doc=481,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15049383 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04278204 = queryNorm
                0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 481, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=481)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Pirmasenser Zeitung. Nr. 29 vom 03.02.2023, S.2
  20. Jaeger, L.: Wissenschaftler versus Wissenschaft (2020) 0.01
    0.007728501 = product of:
      0.023185503 = sum of:
        0.023185503 = product of:
          0.069556504 = sum of:
            0.069556504 = weight(_text_:22 in 4156) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.069556504 = score(doc=4156,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14981541 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04278204 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4156, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4156)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    2. 3.2020 14:08:22

Languages

  • e 128
  • d 69

Types

  • a 179
  • el 40
  • m 7
  • p 4
  • x 1
  • More… Less…