Search (56 results, page 2 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Register"
  1. Mauer, P.: Embedded indexing : pros and cons for the indexer (2000) 0.00 
    0.0025756247 = product of:
  0.030907497 = sum of:
    0.030907497 = product of:
      0.061814994 = sum of:
        0.061814994 = weight(_text_:22 in 488) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.061814994 = score(doc=488,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11412105 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032588977 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 488, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=488)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.27-28
  2. Anderson, C.R.: Indexing with a computer : past and present (2000) 0.00 
    0.0025756247 = product of:
  0.030907497 = sum of:
    0.030907497 = product of:
      0.061814994 = sum of:
        0.061814994 = weight(_text_:22 in 489) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.061814994 = score(doc=489,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11412105 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032588977 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 489, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=489)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.23-24
  3. Lee, D.: Judging indexes : the criteria for a good index (2001) 0.00 
    0.0025756247 = product of:
  0.030907497 = sum of:
    0.030907497 = product of:
      0.061814994 = sum of:
        0.061814994 = weight(_text_:22 in 4162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.061814994 = score(doc=4162,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11412105 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032588977 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4162, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4162)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2001) no.4, S.191-194
  4. Weinberg, B.H.: Predecessors of scientific indexing structures in the domain of religion (2001) 0.00 
    0.0025756247 = product of:
  0.030907497 = sum of:
    0.030907497 = product of:
      0.061814994 = sum of:
        0.061814994 = weight(_text_:22 in 4172) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.061814994 = score(doc=4172,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11412105 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032588977 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4172, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4172)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2001) no.4, S.178-180
  5. Weinberg, B.H.: Index structures in early Hebrew Biblical word lists : preludes to the first Latin concordances (2004) 0.00 
    0.0025756247 = product of:
  0.030907497 = sum of:
    0.030907497 = product of:
      0.061814994 = sum of:
        0.061814994 = weight(_text_:22 in 4180) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.061814994 = score(doc=4180,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11412105 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032588977 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4180, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4180)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
    Date
    17.10.2005 13:54:22
  6. Broccoli, K.; Ravenswaay, G.V.: Web indexing : anchors away! (2000) 0.00 
    0.0022190344 = product of:
  0.02662841 = sum of:
    0.02662841 = weight(_text_:internet in 219) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02662841 = score(doc=219,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.09621047 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032588977 = queryNorm
        0.27677247 = fieldWeight in 219, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=219)
  0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
    Abstract
    In this chapter we turn to embedded indexing for the Internet, frequently called Web indexing. We will define Web indexes; describe the structure of entries for Web indexes; present some of the challenges that Web indexers face; and compare Web indexes to search engines. One of the difficulties in defining Web indexes is their relative newness. The first pages were placed on the World Wide Web in 1991 when Tim Berners Lee, its founder, uploaded four files. We are in a period of transition, moving from using well-established forms of writing and communications to others that are still in their infancy. Paramount among these is the Web. For indexers, this is an uncharted voyage where we must jettison firmly established ideas while developing new ones. Where the voyage will end is anyone's guess.
    Theme
    Internet
  7. Bell, H.K.: Indexing biographies, and other stories of human lives (1992) 0.00 
    0.0022076783 = product of:
  0.02649214 = sum of:
    0.02649214 = product of:
      0.05298428 = sum of:
        0.05298428 = weight(_text_:22 in 5396) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05298428 = score(doc=5396,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11412105 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032588977 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 5396, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5396)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Knowledge organization 22(1995) no.1, S.46-47 (R. Fugmann)
  8. Shumaker, L.E.: Indexing the California Home Page (1997) 0.00 
    0.0020921256 = product of:
  0.025105506 = sum of:
    0.025105506 = weight(_text_:internet in 3732) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.025105506 = score(doc=3732,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09621047 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032588977 = queryNorm
        0.2609436 = fieldWeight in 3732, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3732)
  0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
    Theme
    Internet
  9. Wright, J.C.: Indexing after the millenium 1 : getting the tools right (1998) 0.00 
    0.0020921256 = product of:
  0.025105506 = sum of:
    0.025105506 = weight(_text_:internet in 4644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.025105506 = score(doc=4644,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09621047 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032588977 = queryNorm
        0.2609436 = fieldWeight in 4644, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4644)
  0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
    Theme
    Internet
  10. Weinberg, B.H.: ¬The body of a reference work in relation to its index : an analysis of wordsmanship (1996) 0.00 
    0.0020814193 = product of:
  0.02497703 = sum of:
    0.02497703 = product of:
      0.04995406 = sum of:
        0.04995406 = weight(_text_:22 in 6940) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04995406 = score(doc=6940,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.11412105 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032588977 = queryNorm
            0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 6940, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6940)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
    Date
    8. 3.1997 20:22:25
    Source
    Indexer. 20(1996) no.1, S.18-22
  11. Olason, S.C.: Let's get usable! : Usability studies for indexes (2000) 0.00 
    0.0020814193 = product of:
  0.02497703 = sum of:
    0.02497703 = product of:
      0.04995406 = sum of:
        0.04995406 = weight(_text_:22 in 882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04995406 = score(doc=882,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.11412105 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032588977 = queryNorm
            0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 882, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=882)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
    Footnote
    Vgl.: http://www.theindexer.org/files/22-2-olason.pdf.
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2000) no.2, S.91-95
  12. Diepeveen, C.; Fassbender, J.; Robertson, M.: Indexing software (2007) 0.00 
    0.0020709615 = product of:
  0.024851536 = sum of:
    0.024851536 = product of:
      0.049703073 = sum of:
        0.049703073 = weight(_text_:allgemein in 742) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049703073 = score(doc=742,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17123379 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.254347 = idf(docFreq=627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032588977 = queryNorm
            0.2902644 = fieldWeight in 742, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.254347 = idf(docFreq=627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=742)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
    Abstract
    Dieser Beitrag handelt von unterschiedlichen Arten verfügbarer Software zur Erzeugung von Registern und untersucht, ob diese dazu benutzt werden können, ein Register nach internationalen Normen zu erstellen. Da oft behauptet wird, dass die Registererstellung mit einem Computer und ohne Einsatz des Menschen durchführbar sei, untersuchen die Autoren, weshalb Indexieren eine Aktivität des Menschen sein muss und weshalb eine automatische Registererstellung kein zufriedenstellendes Register hervorbringen kann. Automatische Registererstellung kann bestenfalls einen Ausgangspunkt zur weiteren Indexierung liefern. Anschließend wird die Möglichkeit der Registererstellung mit allgemein verfügbarer Software untersucht. Dies kann akzeptable Register hervorbringen, wenngleich oft nur auf mühsame Weise. Für den professionellen Indexierer stellt daher spezielle Indexing Software die bevorzugte Option dar. Die drei am meisten benutzten speziellen Indexierungsprogramme werden kurz bewertet. Ausrichtung und Aussehen dieser Programme sind sehr unterschiedlich, aber die Merkmale und Output-Optionen sind sehr ähnlich. Website Indexing ist ein relativ neues Spezialgebiet innerhalb der Disziplin des Indexierens. Zwei Programme - eine Freeware und ein kommerzielles - zur Erstellung von Registern von Websites werden erörtert. Das Fazit insgesamt ist, dass das Registermachen eine Aktivität ist, die intellektuellen Input des Menschen benötigt. Software kann den Input hervorragend verbessern, aber nicht den Anteil des Menschen daran ersetzen.
  13. Bell, H.K.: History of societies of indexing : part VII: 1992-95 (2000) 0.00 
    0.001839732 = product of:
  0.022076784 = sum of:
    0.022076784 = product of:
      0.044153567 = sum of:
        0.044153567 = weight(_text_:22 in 113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.044153567 = score(doc=113,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11412105 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032588977 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 113, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=113)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2000) no.2, S.81-83
  14. Walker, D.: AusSI Web indexing prizewinners (1997) 0.00 
    0.0018306099 = product of:
  0.021967318 = sum of:
    0.021967318 = weight(_text_:internet in 3728) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.021967318 = score(doc=3728,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09621047 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032588977 = queryNorm
        0.22832564 = fieldWeight in 3728, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3728)
  0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
    Theme
    Internet
  15. Wright, J.C.: How to index online (1997) 0.00 
    0.0018306099 = product of:
  0.021967318 = sum of:
    0.021967318 = weight(_text_:internet in 3729) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.021967318 = score(doc=3729,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09621047 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032588977 = queryNorm
        0.22832564 = fieldWeight in 3729, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3729)
  0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
    Theme
    Internet
  16. Browne, G.: Changes in website indexing (2007) 0.00 
    0.0018306099 = product of:
  0.021967318 = sum of:
    0.021967318 = weight(_text_:internet in 747) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.021967318 = score(doc=747,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09621047 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032588977 = queryNorm
        0.22832564 = fieldWeight in 747, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=747)
  0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
    Abstract
    Website-Indexing wurde in den 1990er Jahren wichtig, als Indexierer, Bibliothekare und Web-Manager mit verschiedenen Ansätzen experimentierten, einen besseren Zugang zu Informationen zu schaffen, die sie über das Internet anboten. Die Tools, mit denen Register erstellt werden, reichten von simpler HTML-Codierung bis zu HTML Indexer und anderer spezieller Software. Neue Indexe und Software-Produkte entstanden, aber viele Website-Register sind auch wieder verschwunden. Es werden die Gründe für die Erstellung von Website-Indexen dargestellt und Beispiele von Website-Indexen und anderen Zugangsoptionen erläutert, die in den letzten 15 Jahren entstanden, die aber nicht mehr zur Verfügung stehen. Es werden einige Vermutungen über die Gründe für diese Veränderungen angestellt.
  17. Moncrief, L.: Indexing computer-related documents (2000) 0.00 
    0.0015690941 = product of:
  0.01882913 = sum of:
    0.01882913 = weight(_text_:internet in 214) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01882913 = score(doc=214,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09621047 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032588977 = queryNorm
        0.1957077 = fieldWeight in 214, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=214)
  0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
    Abstract
    The explosion in personal computing and in computer technology has brought a wealth of opportunities for indexers. Annually, traditional publishers produce numerous books on computer topics, while software and hardware companies constantly issue new products with manuals that require indexes. Indexers can find work with these high-technology publishers or can subcontract with technical documentation firms or with freelance technical writers. The range of audiences for computer-related documents is wide and varied, as is the range of topics. These documents are not limited to end-user software manuals, but include programming, Internet, and networking topics among others. Hardware companies, in addition to computer manufacturers, are also a good potential source of clients. Many hardware products have a sizeable software component that requires its own set of indexed manuals. There are advantages and disadvantages to working with high-technology companies (and their contractors) vs. working with traditional publishers. It is simply a matter of personal taste which type of client you prefer. I have truly enjoyed working with both.
  18. Connolly, D.A.: ¬The many uses of Email discussion lists (2000) 0.00 
    0.0015690941 = product of:
  0.01882913 = sum of:
    0.01882913 = weight(_text_:internet in 216) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01882913 = score(doc=216,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09621047 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032588977 = queryNorm
        0.1957077 = fieldWeight in 216, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=216)
  0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
    Theme
    Internet
  19. Rowland, M.J.: <Meta> tags (2000) 0.00 
    0.0015690941 = product of:
  0.01882913 = sum of:
    0.01882913 = weight(_text_:internet in 222) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01882913 = score(doc=222,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09621047 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032588977 = queryNorm
        0.1957077 = fieldWeight in 222, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=222)
  0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
    Theme
    Internet
  20. Rice, R.: Putting sample indexes on your Web site (2000) 0.00 
    0.0014793561 = product of:
  0.017752273 = sum of:
    0.017752273 = weight(_text_:internet in 226) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017752273 = score(doc=226,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.09621047 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032588977 = queryNorm
        0.18451498 = fieldWeight in 226, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=226)
  0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
    Abstract
    Why do you need samples of your indexing work on your Web site? Think about these situations: Scenario 1: You've contacted a potential client who says he has a project ready to be assigned. He requests some samples of your work. You fax them to him right away and call back a few hours later. "Oh," he says, "I didn't get the fax but anyway I already assigned the project. I can keep your name for future reference, though." Scenario 2: Another potential client asks you to send her some samples and if they're satisfactory, she'll put you on the freelance list. You mail them to her, or even FedEx them if you can spend the money. You wait a week and call her back. She does not remember who you are, and has not seen the samples. If she can find them, she says, she will file them for future reference. Scenario 3: You contacted a potential client who has asked to see some samples of your work. As it happens, she has a project ready to go and if your work is acceptable, you can have the job. You can FedEx her some samples, or you can fax them, she says. You think about FedEx and faxing costs, and mail and faxes that never get to her desk, and the risk of losing the assignment if she calls someone else later today, which she almost surely will, and you suggest an alternative. If she has Internet access, she can see a list of the indexes you've completed, and some samples of your indexes instantly. She is impressed that you have the know-how to create a Web site, and agrees to take a look and call you back shortly. You give her your URL and your phone number, and stand by. In five minutes she calls you back, says she is pleased with what she saw, and asks for your address so she can send the job out to you today.
    Theme
    Internet

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 53
  • d 3
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 50
  • m 5
  • s 2
  • More… Less…

Themes