Search (25455 results, page 1 of 1273)

  • × type_ss:"a"
  1. Suchenwirth, L.: Sacherschliessung in Zeiten von Corona : neue Herausforderungen und Chancen (2019) 0.33
    0.33385414 = product of:
      0.89027774 = sum of:
        0.047481976 = product of:
          0.14244592 = sum of:
            0.14244592 = weight(_text_:3a in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14244592 = score(doc=484,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.25345436 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.029895496 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.20144895 = weight(_text_:2f in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.20144895 = score(doc=484,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.25345436 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029895496 = queryNorm
            0.7948135 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
        0.20144895 = weight(_text_:2f in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.20144895 = score(doc=484,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.25345436 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029895496 = queryNorm
            0.7948135 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
        0.036999997 = weight(_text_:der in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036999997 = score(doc=484,freq=28.0), product of:
            0.06677957 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029895496 = queryNorm
            0.55406165 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
              5.2915025 = tf(freq=28.0), with freq of:
                28.0 = termFreq=28.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
        0.20144895 = weight(_text_:2f in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.20144895 = score(doc=484,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.25345436 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029895496 = queryNorm
            0.7948135 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
        0.20144895 = weight(_text_:2f in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.20144895 = score(doc=484,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.25345436 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029895496 = queryNorm
            0.7948135 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
      0.375 = coord(6/16)
    
    Abstract
    Eine der wesentlichen Aufgaben als Fachreferent*in ist die inhaltliche Erschließung der neuerworbenen Literatur, sowie die Begutachtung und Auswahl der neu erschienenen Werke in den jeweiligen Fachgebieten hinsichtlich der Relevanz für die eigenen Sammlungen gemäß dem Sammlungsprofil der TU Wien Bibliothek. Im Zuge der Corona-Krise wurde die herkömmliche Arbeitsweise in der Sacherschließung beeinträchtigt, und es haben sich neue Herausforderungen, aber auch Möglichkeiten ergeben. Neben der fehlenden Autopsie der Literatur leidet auch die Sichtung und Erwerbung neuer Literatur unter der physischen Abwesenheit vom Arbeitsplatz bzw. der entsprechenden technischen Infrastruktur. Auch der persönliche Austausch mit den Kolleg*innen wurde deutlich erschwert. Neben den Schwierigkeiten wurden aber auch die neuen Handlungsoptionen auf beruflicher und individueller Ebene positiv gesehen. In dem Artikel werden unsere individuellen Erfahrungen an der TU Wien Bibliothek sowie Ausblicke in die Zukunft wiedergegeben.
    Footnote
    https%3A%2F%2Fjournals.univie.ac.at%2Findex.php%2Fvoebm%2Farticle%2Fdownload%2F5332%2F5271%2F&usg=AOvVaw2yQdFGHlmOwVls7ANCpTii.
    Source
    Mitteilungen der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare. 73(2020) H.3/4, S.496-503
  2. Axelos, C.; Flasch, K.; Schepers, H.; Kuhlen, R.; Romberg, R.; Zimmermann, R.: Allgemeines/Besonderes (1971-2007) 0.30
    0.30099022 = product of:
      0.9631687 = sum of:
        0.23502378 = weight(_text_:2f in 4031) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.23502378 = score(doc=4031,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.25345436 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029895496 = queryNorm
            0.92728245 = fieldWeight in 4031, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4031)
        0.23502378 = weight(_text_:2f in 4031) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.23502378 = score(doc=4031,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.25345436 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029895496 = queryNorm
            0.92728245 = fieldWeight in 4031, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4031)
        0.023073554 = weight(_text_:der in 4031) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023073554 = score(doc=4031,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.06677957 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029895496 = queryNorm
            0.34551817 = fieldWeight in 4031, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4031)
        0.23502378 = weight(_text_:2f in 4031) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.23502378 = score(doc=4031,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.25345436 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029895496 = queryNorm
            0.92728245 = fieldWeight in 4031, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4031)
        0.23502378 = weight(_text_:2f in 4031) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.23502378 = score(doc=4031,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.25345436 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029895496 = queryNorm
            0.92728245 = fieldWeight in 4031, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4031)
      0.3125 = coord(5/16)
    
    Abstract
    Als Erfinder des «Allgemeinen» gilt, gemäß dem Bericht des Aristoteles und seit diesem Bericht, Sokrates. Er ist es, der nicht mehr danach suchte, woraus ein Ding zu dem geworden ist, was es ist, oder wie es entstanden ist, sondern danach, «was [ein Ding] ist», und somit ist Sokrates der erste gewesen, der die Herausarbeitung des Allgemeinen (?a?????) forderte und mit seinen Fragen seine Gesprächspartner zu dieser Herausarbeitung trieb bzw. lockte; die Definition (???sµ??) war das Ziel des sokratischen Gesprächs, und die sokratische Aporie war das Vehikel.
    Footnote
    DOI: 10.24894/HWPh.5033. Vgl. unter: https://www.schwabeonline.ch/schwabe-xaveropp/elibrary/start.xav#__elibrary__%2F%2F*%5B%40attr_id%3D%27verw.allgemeinesbesonderes%27%5D__1515856414979.
    Source
    Historisches Wörterbuch der Philosophie. Hrsg.: J. Ritter, K. Gründer u. G. Gabriel
  3. Li, L.; Shang, Y.; Zhang, W.: Improvement of HITS-based algorithms on Web documents 0.27
    0.2666493 = product of:
      0.8532778 = sum of:
        0.047481976 = product of:
          0.14244592 = sum of:
            0.14244592 = weight(_text_:3a in 2514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14244592 = score(doc=2514,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.25345436 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.029895496 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2514, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2514)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.20144895 = weight(_text_:2f in 2514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.20144895 = score(doc=2514,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.25345436 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029895496 = queryNorm
            0.7948135 = fieldWeight in 2514, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2514)
        0.20144895 = weight(_text_:2f in 2514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.20144895 = score(doc=2514,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.25345436 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029895496 = queryNorm
            0.7948135 = fieldWeight in 2514, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2514)
        0.20144895 = weight(_text_:2f in 2514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.20144895 = score(doc=2514,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.25345436 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029895496 = queryNorm
            0.7948135 = fieldWeight in 2514, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2514)
        0.20144895 = weight(_text_:2f in 2514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.20144895 = score(doc=2514,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.25345436 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029895496 = queryNorm
            0.7948135 = fieldWeight in 2514, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2514)
      0.3125 = coord(5/16)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fdelab.csd.auth.gr%2F~dimitris%2Fcourses%2Fir_spring06%2Fpage_rank_computing%2Fp527-li.pdf. Vgl. auch: http://www2002.org/CDROM/refereed/643/.
  4. Schrodt, R.: Tiefen und Untiefen im wissenschaftlichen Sprachgebrauch (2008) 0.26
    0.25719404 = product of:
      0.82302094 = sum of:
        0.063309304 = product of:
          0.1899279 = sum of:
            0.1899279 = weight(_text_:3a in 140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1899279 = score(doc=140,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.25345436 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.029895496 = queryNorm
                0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 140, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=140)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.1899279 = weight(_text_:2f in 140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1899279 = score(doc=140,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25345436 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029895496 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 140, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=140)
        0.1899279 = weight(_text_:2f in 140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1899279 = score(doc=140,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25345436 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029895496 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 140, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=140)
        0.1899279 = weight(_text_:2f in 140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1899279 = score(doc=140,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25345436 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029895496 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 140, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=140)
        0.1899279 = weight(_text_:2f in 140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1899279 = score(doc=140,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25345436 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029895496 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 140, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=140)
      0.3125 = coord(5/16)
    
    Content
    Vgl. auch: https://studylibde.com/doc/13053640/richard-schrodt. Vgl. auch: http%3A%2F%2Fwww.univie.ac.at%2FGermanistik%2Fschrodt%2Fvorlesung%2Fwissenschaftssprache.doc&usg=AOvVaw1lDLDR6NFf1W0-oC9mEUJf.
  5. Popper, K.R.: Three worlds : the Tanner lecture on human values. Deliverd at the University of Michigan, April 7, 1978 (1978) 0.26
    0.25719404 = product of:
      0.82302094 = sum of:
        0.063309304 = product of:
          0.1899279 = sum of:
            0.1899279 = weight(_text_:3a in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1899279 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.25345436 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.029895496 = queryNorm
                0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.1899279 = weight(_text_:2f in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1899279 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25345436 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029895496 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
        0.1899279 = weight(_text_:2f in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1899279 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25345436 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029895496 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
        0.1899279 = weight(_text_:2f in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1899279 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25345436 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029895496 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
        0.1899279 = weight(_text_:2f in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1899279 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25345436 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029895496 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
      0.3125 = coord(5/16)
    
    Source
    https%3A%2F%2Ftannerlectures.utah.edu%2F_documents%2Fa-to-z%2Fp%2Fpopper80.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3f4QRTEH-OEBmoYr2J_c7H
  6. Herb, U.; Beucke, D.: ¬Die Zukunft der Impact-Messung : Social Media, Nutzung und Zitate im World Wide Web (2013) 0.24
    0.24323684 = product of:
      0.77835786 = sum of:
        0.1899279 = weight(_text_:2f in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1899279 = score(doc=2188,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25345436 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029895496 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
        0.1899279 = weight(_text_:2f in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1899279 = score(doc=2188,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25345436 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029895496 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
        0.018646248 = weight(_text_:der in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018646248 = score(doc=2188,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.06677957 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029895496 = queryNorm
            0.27922085 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
        0.1899279 = weight(_text_:2f in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1899279 = score(doc=2188,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25345436 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029895496 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
        0.1899279 = weight(_text_:2f in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1899279 = score(doc=2188,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25345436 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029895496 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
      0.3125 = coord(5/16)
    
    Abstract
    Wissenschaftliche Karrieren und Publikationen benötigen Reputation und möglichst viel Beachtung. Literatur, die diese Aufmerksamkeit findet, wird - so die gängige Annahme - häufig zitiert. Ausgehend von dieser Überlegung wurden Verfahren der Zitationsmessung entwickelt, die Auskunft über die Relevanz oder (wie im- und explizit oft auch postuliert wird) gar die Qualität einer Publikation oder eines Wissenschaftlers geben sollen.
    Content
    Vgl. unter: https://www.leibniz-science20.de%2Fforschung%2Fprojekte%2Faltmetrics-in-verschiedenen-wissenschaftsdisziplinen%2F&ei=2jTgVaaXGcK4Udj1qdgB&usg=AFQjCNFOPdONj4RKBDf9YDJOLuz3lkGYlg&sig2=5YI3KWIGxBmk5_kv0P_8iQ.
  7. Donsbach, W.: Wahrheit in den Medien : über den Sinn eines methodischen Objektivitätsbegriffes (2001) 0.24
    0.23746859 = product of:
      0.54278535 = sum of:
        0.039568312 = product of:
          0.11870494 = sum of:
            0.11870494 = weight(_text_:3a in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11870494 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.25345436 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.029895496 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.11870494 = weight(_text_:2f in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11870494 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25345436 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029895496 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
        0.11870494 = weight(_text_:2f in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11870494 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25345436 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029895496 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
        0.02330781 = weight(_text_:der in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02330781 = score(doc=5895,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.06677957 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029895496 = queryNorm
            0.34902605 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
        0.11870494 = weight(_text_:2f in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11870494 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25345436 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029895496 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
        0.11870494 = weight(_text_:2f in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11870494 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25345436 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029895496 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
        0.005089458 = weight(_text_:information in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005089458 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.052480884 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029895496 = queryNorm
            0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
      0.4375 = coord(7/16)
    
    Abstract
    Das Problem der Wahrnehmung und Darstellung von Wahrheit durch die Medien führt zu vier zentralen Fragen: Wie viel Wahrheit gibt es in der Welt, über die Journalisten berichten müssen? Wie ermittelt oder recherchiert man diese Wahrheit? Wie trennt man die Spreu vom Weizen? Und wie geht man als Journalist mit dem um, was man als Wahrheit erkannt hat oder erkannt zu haben glaubt? Hier gibt es ganz offensichtlich eine Parallele zwischen Journalisten und Wissenschaftlern. Journalisten und Wissenschaftler brauchen erstens Hypothesen, zweitens geeignete Hypothesentests, drittens ein gutes Abgrenzungs-Kriterium und viertens Verfahren, um die erkannten Sachverhalte auf angemessene Weise für eine Kommunikation mit anderen zu repräsentieren, das heißt sie darzustellen. Es gibt zwei große Unterschiede zwischen Journalisten und Wissenschaftlern: Journalisten sind in der Regel auf raum-zeitlich begrenzte Aussagen aus, Wissenschaftler in der Regel auf raumzeitlich unbegrenzte Gesetze. Aber diese Unterschiede sind fließend, weil Wissenschaftler raum-zeitlich begrenzte Aussagen brauchen, um ihre All-Aussagen zu überprüfen, und Journalisten sich immer häufiger auf das Feld der allgemeinen Gesetzes-Aussagen wagen oder doch zumindest Kausalinterpretationen für soziale Phänomene anbieten. Der zweite Unterschied besteht darin, dass die Wissenschaft weitgehend professionalisiert ist (zumindest gilt dies uneingeschränkt für die Naturwissenschaften und die Medizin), was ihr relativ klare Abgrenzungs- und Güte-Kriterien beschert hat. Diese fehlen weitgehend im Journalismus.
    Content
    Der Beitrag basiert auf einem Vortrag beim 9. Ethiktag "Wissenschaft und Medien" am Zentrum für Ethik und Recht in der Medizin des Universitätsklinikums Freiburg im Februar 2001.
    Source
    Politische Meinung. 381(2001) Nr.1, S.65-74 [https%3A%2F%2Fwww.dgfe.de%2Ffileadmin%2FOrdnerRedakteure%2FSektionen%2FSek02_AEW%2FKWF%2FPublikationen_Reihe_1989-2003%2FBand_17%2FBd_17_1994_355-406_A.pdf&usg=AOvVaw2KcbRsHy5UQ9QRIUyuOLNi]
    Theme
    Information
  8. Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004) 0.24
    0.23603138 = product of:
      0.629417 = sum of:
        0.047481976 = product of:
          0.14244592 = sum of:
            0.14244592 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14244592 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.25345436 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.029895496 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.14244592 = weight(_text_:2f in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14244592 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25345436 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029895496 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
        0.14244592 = weight(_text_:2f in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14244592 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25345436 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029895496 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
        0.14244592 = weight(_text_:2f in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14244592 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25345436 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029895496 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
        0.14244592 = weight(_text_:2f in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14244592 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25345436 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029895496 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
        0.01215128 = product of:
          0.02430256 = sum of:
            0.02430256 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02430256 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.104688935 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.029895496 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.375 = coord(6/16)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
    Date
    8. 1.2013 10:22:32
  9. Mas, S.; Marleau, Y.: Proposition of a faceted classification model to support corporate information organization and digital records management (2009) 0.23
    0.23471354 = product of:
      0.6259028 = sum of:
        0.047481976 = product of:
          0.14244592 = sum of:
            0.14244592 = weight(_text_:3a in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14244592 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.25345436 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.029895496 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.14244592 = weight(_text_:2f in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14244592 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25345436 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029895496 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
        0.14244592 = weight(_text_:2f in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14244592 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25345436 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029895496 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
        0.14244592 = weight(_text_:2f in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14244592 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25345436 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029895496 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
        0.14244592 = weight(_text_:2f in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14244592 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25345436 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029895496 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
        0.008637097 = weight(_text_:information in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008637097 = score(doc=2918,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.052480884 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029895496 = queryNorm
            0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
      0.375 = coord(6/16)
    
    Abstract
    The employees of an organization often use a personal hierarchical classification scheme to organize digital documents that are stored on their own workstations. As this may make it hard for other employees to retrieve these documents, there is a risk that the organization will lose track of needed documentation. Furthermore, the inherent boundaries of such a hierarchical structure require making arbitrary decisions about which specific criteria the classification will b.e based on (for instance, the administrative activity or the document type, although a document can have several attributes and require classification in several classes).A faceted classification model to support corporate information organization is proposed. Partially based on Ranganathan's facets theory, this model aims not only to standardize the organization of digital documents, but also to simplify the management of a document throughout its life cycle for both individuals and organizations, while ensuring compliance to regulatory and policy requirements.
    Footnote
    Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplore/login.jsp?reload=true&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fiel5%2F4755313%2F4755314%2F04755480.pdf%3Farnumber%3D4755480&authDecision=-203.
  10. Zeng, Q.; Yu, M.; Yu, W.; Xiong, J.; Shi, Y.; Jiang, M.: Faceted hierarchy : a new graph type to organize scientific concepts and a construction method (2019) 0.23
    0.23376489 = product of:
      0.62337303 = sum of:
        0.047481976 = product of:
          0.14244592 = sum of:
            0.14244592 = weight(_text_:3a in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14244592 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.25345436 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.029895496 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.14244592 = weight(_text_:2f in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14244592 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25345436 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029895496 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
        0.14244592 = weight(_text_:2f in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14244592 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25345436 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029895496 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
        0.14244592 = weight(_text_:2f in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14244592 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25345436 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029895496 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
        0.14244592 = weight(_text_:2f in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14244592 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25345436 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029895496 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
        0.00610735 = weight(_text_:information in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00610735 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.052480884 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029895496 = queryNorm
            0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
      0.375 = coord(6/16)
    
    Abstract
    On a scientific concept hierarchy, a parent concept may have a few attributes, each of which has multiple values being a group of child concepts. We call these attributes facets: classification has a few facets such as application (e.g., face recognition), model (e.g., svm, knn), and metric (e.g., precision). In this work, we aim at building faceted concept hierarchies from scientific literature. Hierarchy construction methods heavily rely on hypernym detection, however, the faceted relations are parent-to-child links but the hypernym relation is a multi-hop, i.e., ancestor-to-descendent link with a specific facet "type-of". We use information extraction techniques to find synonyms, sibling concepts, and ancestor-descendent relations from a data science corpus. And we propose a hierarchy growth algorithm to infer the parent-child links from the three types of relationships. It resolves conflicts by maintaining the acyclic structure of a hierarchy.
    Content
    Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Faclanthology.org%2FD19-5317.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0ZZFyq5wWTtNTvNkrvjlGA.
  11. Malsburg, C. von der: ¬The correlation theory of brain function (1981) 0.23
    0.23087665 = product of:
      0.52771807 = sum of:
        0.039568312 = product of:
          0.11870494 = sum of:
            0.11870494 = weight(_text_:3a in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11870494 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.25345436 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.029895496 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.11870494 = weight(_text_:2f in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11870494 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25345436 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029895496 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
        0.11870494 = weight(_text_:2f in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11870494 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25345436 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029895496 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
        0.008240555 = weight(_text_:der in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008240555 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06677957 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029895496 = queryNorm
            0.12339935 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
        0.11870494 = weight(_text_:2f in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11870494 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25345436 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029895496 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
        0.11870494 = weight(_text_:2f in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11870494 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25345436 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029895496 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
        0.005089458 = weight(_text_:information in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005089458 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.052480884 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029895496 = queryNorm
            0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
      0.4375 = coord(7/16)
    
    Source
    http%3A%2F%2Fcogprints.org%2F1380%2F1%2FvdM_correlation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0g7DvZbQPb2U7dYb49b9v_
    Theme
    Information
  12. Vetere, G.; Lenzerini, M.: Models for semantic interoperability in service-oriented architectures (2005) 0.23
    0.22504479 = product of:
      0.7201433 = sum of:
        0.05539564 = product of:
          0.16618691 = sum of:
            0.16618691 = weight(_text_:3a in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.16618691 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.25345436 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.029895496 = queryNorm
                0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.16618691 = weight(_text_:2f in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16618691 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25345436 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029895496 = queryNorm
            0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
        0.16618691 = weight(_text_:2f in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16618691 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25345436 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029895496 = queryNorm
            0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
        0.16618691 = weight(_text_:2f in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16618691 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25345436 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029895496 = queryNorm
            0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
        0.16618691 = weight(_text_:2f in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16618691 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25345436 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029895496 = queryNorm
            0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
      0.3125 = coord(5/16)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/login.jsp?tp=&arnumber=5386707&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fxpls%2Fabs_all.jsp%3Farnumber%3D5386707.
  13. Noever, D.; Ciolino, M.: ¬The Turing deception (2022) 0.19
    0.19289553 = product of:
      0.6172657 = sum of:
        0.047481976 = product of:
          0.14244592 = sum of:
            0.14244592 = weight(_text_:3a in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14244592 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.25345436 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.029895496 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.14244592 = weight(_text_:2f in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14244592 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25345436 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029895496 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
        0.14244592 = weight(_text_:2f in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14244592 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25345436 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029895496 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
        0.14244592 = weight(_text_:2f in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14244592 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25345436 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029895496 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
        0.14244592 = weight(_text_:2f in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14244592 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25345436 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029895496 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
      0.3125 = coord(5/16)
    
    Source
    https%3A%2F%2Farxiv.org%2Fabs%2F2212.06721&usg=AOvVaw3i_9pZm9y_dQWoHi6uv0EN
  14. Luft, A.L.: Information (1997) 0.10
    0.099625014 = product of:
      0.39850006 = sum of:
        0.13759172 = weight(_text_:informatik in 1358) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13759172 = score(doc=1358,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15254098 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.1024737 = idf(docFreq=730, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029895496 = queryNorm
            0.9019984 = fieldWeight in 1358, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.1024737 = idf(docFreq=730, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1358)
        0.026369777 = weight(_text_:der in 1358) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026369777 = score(doc=1358,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06677957 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029895496 = queryNorm
            0.3948779 = fieldWeight in 1358, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1358)
        0.2115063 = weight(_text_:datenverarbeitung in 1358) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2115063 = score(doc=1358,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18912636 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.326249 = idf(docFreq=214, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029895496 = queryNorm
            1.1183333 = fieldWeight in 1358, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.326249 = idf(docFreq=214, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1358)
        0.023032257 = weight(_text_:information in 1358) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023032257 = score(doc=1358,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.052480884 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029895496 = queryNorm
            0.43886948 = fieldWeight in 1358, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1358)
      0.25 = coord(4/16)
    
    Source
    Lexikon der Informatik und Datenverarbeitung. Hrsg.: H.-J. Scheider. 4. Aufl
    Theme
    Information
  15. Luft, A.L.: Daten (1997) 0.10
    0.097938515 = product of:
      0.39175406 = sum of:
        0.13759172 = weight(_text_:informatik in 1359) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13759172 = score(doc=1359,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15254098 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.1024737 = idf(docFreq=730, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029895496 = queryNorm
            0.9019984 = fieldWeight in 1359, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.1024737 = idf(docFreq=730, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1359)
        0.026369777 = weight(_text_:der in 1359) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026369777 = score(doc=1359,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06677957 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029895496 = queryNorm
            0.3948779 = fieldWeight in 1359, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1359)
        0.2115063 = weight(_text_:datenverarbeitung in 1359) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2115063 = score(doc=1359,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18912636 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.326249 = idf(docFreq=214, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029895496 = queryNorm
            1.1183333 = fieldWeight in 1359, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.326249 = idf(docFreq=214, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1359)
        0.016286267 = weight(_text_:information in 1359) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016286267 = score(doc=1359,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.052480884 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029895496 = queryNorm
            0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 1359, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1359)
      0.25 = coord(4/16)
    
    Source
    Lexikon der Informatik und Datenverarbeitung. Hrsg.: H.-J. Scheider. 4. Aufl
    Theme
    Information
  16. Nohr, H.: Wissensmanagement (2004) 0.07
    0.07264991 = product of:
      0.23247972 = sum of:
        0.042997412 = weight(_text_:informatik in 2924) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042997412 = score(doc=2924,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15254098 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.1024737 = idf(docFreq=730, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029895496 = queryNorm
            0.2818745 = fieldWeight in 2924, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.1024737 = idf(docFreq=730, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2924)
        0.030833334 = weight(_text_:der in 2924) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030833334 = score(doc=2924,freq=28.0), product of:
            0.06677957 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029895496 = queryNorm
            0.46171808 = fieldWeight in 2924, product of:
              5.2915025 = tf(freq=28.0), with freq of:
                28.0 = termFreq=28.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2924)
        0.09384119 = weight(_text_:wirtschaftsinformatik in 2924) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09384119 = score(doc=2924,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22535236 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.538004 = idf(docFreq=63, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029895496 = queryNorm
            0.4164198 = fieldWeight in 2924, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.538004 = idf(docFreq=63, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2924)
        0.059718326 = product of:
          0.11943665 = sum of:
            0.11943665 = weight(_text_:wissensmanagement in 2924) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11943665 = score(doc=2924,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.17977081 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.0133076 = idf(docFreq=293, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.029895496 = queryNorm
                0.6643829 = fieldWeight in 2924, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  6.0133076 = idf(docFreq=293, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2924)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.005089458 = weight(_text_:information in 2924) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005089458 = score(doc=2924,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.052480884 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029895496 = queryNorm
            0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 2924, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2924)
      0.3125 = coord(5/16)
    
    Abstract
    Das Management von Wissen wird in Anbetracht veränderter Rahmenbedingungen wie der Entwicklung zu einer Informations- und Wissensgesellschaft, sich rasch vollziehender technologischer Entwicklungen sowie der globalen Vernetzung der Wirtschaftsbeziehungen und dem unmittelbaren Zugang zu weltweit vorhandenen Informationen zu einem zentralen Faktor für Unternehmen. Gerade in den letzten Jahren ist aufgrund rascher Entwicklungen vor allem im Bereich der Informations- und Kommunikationstechnologie (Datenbanken, Wissensmanagement-Software, Internet und Intranet, Portaltechnologie) die Bedeutung der Ressource Wissen für Unternehmen erheblich gestiegen und damit der Bedarf an einem funktionierenden Wissensmanagement. Wir sprechen bereits von wissensintensiven Unternehmen", deren Wertschöpfung vor allem auf den vierten Produktionsfaktor Wissen zurückgeführt wird. Getrieben durch diese Entwicklungen ist den heutigen Ansätzen des Wissensmanagements eines gemeinsam: Es geht vorrangig um das Management des im Unternehmen bereits vorhandenen Wissens, um den Aufbau einer gemeinsamen und geteilten Wissensbasis. Im Mittelpunkt stehen Aspekte der Produktivitäts- und Effizienzsteigerung vorwiegend operativer Prozesse. Das Wissensmanagement ist ein Anliegen vieler Disziplinen. Relevante Beiträge stammen u.a. aus der Betriebswirtschafts- und Managementlehre (u.a. Strategisches Management, Organisationslehre, Human Resource), der Wirtschaftsinformatik, der Informatik, der Organisationspsychologie oder der Philosophie. Die Vielfalt der Sichtweisen sowie die vergleichsweise Neuheit des Themas sind verantwortlich dafür, dass wir keine allgemein akzeptierte Methodik präsentieren.
    Source
    Grundlagen der praktischen Information und Dokumentation. 5., völlig neu gefaßte Ausgabe. 2 Bde. Hrsg. von R. Kuhlen, Th. Seeger u. D. Strauch. Begründet von Klaus Laisiepen, Ernst Lutterbeck, Karl-Heinrich Meyer-Uhlenried. Bd.1: Handbuch zur Einführung in die Informationswissenschaft und -praxis
  17. Lustig, G.: Ranking (1991) 0.07
    0.070400216 = product of:
      0.3754678 = sum of:
        0.13759172 = weight(_text_:informatik in 1357) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13759172 = score(doc=1357,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15254098 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.1024737 = idf(docFreq=730, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029895496 = queryNorm
            0.9019984 = fieldWeight in 1357, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.1024737 = idf(docFreq=730, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1357)
        0.026369777 = weight(_text_:der in 1357) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026369777 = score(doc=1357,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06677957 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029895496 = queryNorm
            0.3948779 = fieldWeight in 1357, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1357)
        0.2115063 = weight(_text_:datenverarbeitung in 1357) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2115063 = score(doc=1357,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18912636 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.326249 = idf(docFreq=214, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029895496 = queryNorm
            1.1183333 = fieldWeight in 1357, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.326249 = idf(docFreq=214, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1357)
      0.1875 = coord(3/16)
    
    Source
    Lexikon der Informatik und Datenverarbeitung. Hrsg.: H.-J. Scheider. 3. Aufl
  18. Stoyan, H.: Information in der Informatik (2004) 0.07
    0.066317834 = product of:
      0.21221706 = sum of:
        0.11408504 = weight(_text_:informatik in 2959) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11408504 = score(doc=2959,freq=22.0), product of:
            0.15254098 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.1024737 = idf(docFreq=730, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029895496 = queryNorm
            0.7478976 = fieldWeight in 2959, product of:
              4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                22.0 = termFreq=22.0
              5.1024737 = idf(docFreq=730, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2959)
        0.027181342 = weight(_text_:der in 2959) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027181342 = score(doc=2959,freq=34.0), product of:
            0.06677957 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029895496 = queryNorm
            0.40703082 = fieldWeight in 2959, product of:
              5.8309517 = tf(freq=34.0), with freq of:
                34.0 = termFreq=34.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2959)
        0.052876577 = weight(_text_:datenverarbeitung in 2959) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.052876577 = score(doc=2959,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18912636 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.326249 = idf(docFreq=214, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029895496 = queryNorm
            0.27958333 = fieldWeight in 2959, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.326249 = idf(docFreq=214, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2959)
        0.009973261 = weight(_text_:information in 2959) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009973261 = score(doc=2959,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.052480884 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029895496 = queryNorm
            0.19003606 = fieldWeight in 2959, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2959)
        0.008100854 = product of:
          0.016201708 = sum of:
            0.016201708 = weight(_text_:22 in 2959) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.016201708 = score(doc=2959,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.104688935 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.029895496 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2959, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2959)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.3125 = coord(5/16)
    
    Abstract
    1957 hat Karl Steinbuch mit seinem Mitarbeiter Helmut Gröttrup den Begriff "Informatik" erfunden. Er gebrauchte diesen Begriff nicht zur Bezeichnung eines wissenschaftlichen Fachgebiets, sondern eher für seine Abteilung bei der Firma SEL in Stuttgart. Zu dieser Zeit standen sich in diesem Feld drei Parteien gegenüber: Die Mathematiker, die mit Rechenanlagen elektronisch rechneten, die Elektrotechniker, die Nachrichtenverarbeitung trieben und die Wirtschaftler und Lochkartenleute, die mit mechanisch-elektronischen Geräten zählten, buchten und aufsummierten. Während sich in den USA und England die Mathematiker mit dem Namen für das Gerät "Computer" durchsetzten und die Wissenschaft pragmatisch "Computer Science" genannt wurde, war in Deutschland die Diskussion bis in die 60er Jahre unentschieden: Die Abkürzung EDV hält sich noch immer gegenüber "Rechner" und "Computer"; Steinbuch selbst nannte 1962 sein Taschenbuch nicht "Taschenbuch der Informatik" sondern "Taschenbuch der Nachrichtenverarbeitung". 1955 wurde eine Informatik-Tagung in Darmstadt noch "Elektronische Rechenanlagen und Informationsverarbeitung" genannt. Die Internationale Gesellschaft hieß "International Federation for Information Processing". 1957 aber definierte Steinbuch "Informatik" als "Automatische Informationsverarbeitung" und war auf diese Art den Mathematikern entgegengegangen. Als Firmenbezeichnung schien der Begriff geschützt zu sein. Noch 1967 wurde der Fachbeirat der Bundesregierung "für Datenverarbeitung" genannt. Erst als die Franzosen die Bezeichnung "Informatique" verwendeten, war der Weg frei für die Übernahme. So wurde der Ausschuss des Fachbeirats zur Etablierung des Hochschulstudiums bereits der "Einführung von Informatik-Studiengängen" gewidmet. Man überzeugte den damaligen Forschungsminister Stoltenberg und dieser machte in einer Rede den Begriff "Informatik" publik. Ende der 60er Jahre übernahmen F. L. Bauer und andere den Begriff, nannten 1969 die Berufsgenossenschaft "Gesellschaft für Informatik" und sorgten für die entsprechende Benennung des wissenschaftlichen Fachgebiets. Die strittigen Grundbegriffe dieses Prozesses: Information/Informationen, Nachrichten und Daten scheinen heute nur Nuancen zu trennen. Damals ging es natürlich auch um Politik, um Forschungsrichtungen, um den Geist der Wissenschaft, um die Ausrichtung. Mehr Mathematik, mehr Ingenieurwissenschaft oder mehr Betriebswirtschaft, so könnte man die Grundströmungen vereinfachen. Mit der Ausrichtung der Informatik nicht versöhnte Elektrotechniker nannten sich Informationstechniker, die Datenverarbeiter sammelten sich im Lager der Wirtschaftsinformatiker. Mit den Grundbegriffen der Informatik, Nachricht, Information, Datum, hat es seitdem umfangreiche Auseinandersetzungen gegeben. Lehrbücher mussten geschrieben werden, Lexika und Nachschlagewerke wurden verfasst, Arbeitsgruppen tagten. Die Arbeiten C. Shannons zur Kommunikation, mit denen eine statistische Informationstheorie eingeführt worden war, spielten dabei nur eine geringe Rolle.
    Date
    5. 4.2013 10:22:48
    Field
    Informatik
    Source
    Grundlagen der praktischen Information und Dokumentation. 5., völlig neu gefaßte Ausgabe. 2 Bde. Hrsg. von R. Kuhlen, Th. Seeger u. D. Strauch. Begründet von Klaus Laisiepen, Ernst Lutterbeck, Karl-Heinrich Meyer-Uhlenried. Bd.1: Handbuch zur Einführung in die Informationswissenschaft und -praxis
    Theme
    Information
  19. Milchrahm, E.: Betriebliche Informationssysteme als Hauptforschungsgegenstand der Information Systems und Wirtschaftsinformatik (2009) 0.06
    0.06379226 = product of:
      0.34022537 = sum of:
        0.030523445 = weight(_text_:der in 6919) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030523445 = score(doc=6919,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.06677957 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029895496 = queryNorm
            0.4570776 = fieldWeight in 6919, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6919)
        0.2937694 = weight(_text_:wirtschaftsinformatik in 6919) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2937694 = score(doc=6919,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.22535236 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.538004 = idf(docFreq=63, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029895496 = queryNorm
            1.3036002 = fieldWeight in 6919, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              7.538004 = idf(docFreq=63, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6919)
        0.015932525 = weight(_text_:information in 6919) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015932525 = score(doc=6919,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.052480884 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029895496 = queryNorm
            0.3035872 = fieldWeight in 6919, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6919)
      0.1875 = coord(3/16)
    
    Abstract
    Im Rahmen der vorliegenden Arbeit werden die häufig als Schwesterdisziplinen bezeichneten Fachbereiche Wirtschaftsinformatik im deutschen Sprachraum und Information Systems im anglo-amerikanischen Sprachraum im Hinblick auf den Hauptforschungsgegenstand "Betriebliche Informationssysteme" untersucht. Anhand der durchgeführten Vergleichsanalysen zeigt sich, dass Management-orientierte Forschungsfragen in den Information Systems einen höheren Stellenwert als in der Wirtschaftsinformatik haben. Es gibt aber Anzeichen eines wachsenden Interesses an diesbezüglichen Forschungsthemen seitens der Wirtschaftsinformatik. Die vergleichsweise stärkere Technologie-Orientierung der Wirtschaftsinformatik geht einher mit einem starken Praxisbezug und einer eher geringen Allgemeingültigkeit der Forschungsergebnisse. Die verhaltenswissenschaftlich geprägten Information Systems zeigen einen schwächeren Praxisbezug und zeichnen sich eher durch eine theoretische Fundierung und etablierte Forschungsmodelle, wie beispielsweise Technologie-Akzeptanzmodelle, aus.
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 60(2009) H.1, S.49-54
  20. John, M.; Drescher, J.: Semantische Technologien im Informations- und Wissensmanagement : Geschichte, Anwendungen und Ausblick (2006) 0.06
    0.063238405 = product of:
      0.25295362 = sum of:
        0.16473958 = weight(_text_:anwendungen in 5797) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16473958 = score(doc=5797,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.16691269 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.583205 = idf(docFreq=451, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029895496 = queryNorm
            0.98698056 = fieldWeight in 5797, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              5.583205 = idf(docFreq=451, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5797)
        0.032296248 = weight(_text_:der in 5797) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032296248 = score(doc=5797,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.06677957 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029895496 = queryNorm
            0.4836247 = fieldWeight in 5797, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5797)
        0.04777466 = product of:
          0.09554932 = sum of:
            0.09554932 = weight(_text_:wissensmanagement in 5797) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09554932 = score(doc=5797,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17977081 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.0133076 = idf(docFreq=293, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.029895496 = queryNorm
                0.5315063 = fieldWeight in 5797, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.0133076 = idf(docFreq=293, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5797)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.0081431335 = weight(_text_:information in 5797) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0081431335 = score(doc=5797,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.052480884 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029895496 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 5797, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5797)
      0.25 = coord(4/16)
    
    Abstract
    In diesem Kapitel werden anhand der Anwendungen des betrieblichen Informationsmanagements die verschiedenen Wissens- und Informationsprozesse dargestellt, die hei der Entwicklung semantischer Anwendungen grundlegend sind. Ziel ist es aus der Entwicklungsperspektive der einzelnen Anwendungen die Notwendigkeit und den Nutzen aufzuzeigen, der sich aus dem Einsatz von semantischen Technologien ergibt. Die vorgestellten Fallbeispiele veranschaulichen die Einsatzgebiete von semantischen Technologien in der betrieblichen Anwendung.
    Theme
    Information Resources Management

Authors

Languages

Types

  • el 734
  • b 52
  • p 2
  • s 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…

Themes