Search (70 results, page 1 of 4)

  • × theme_ss:"Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus"
  1. Mengel, A.: Thesaurusrelationen, Konsistenz, Inferenz und Interdependenz (1991) 0.02 
    0.023416549 = product of:
  0.117082745 = sum of:
    0.117082745 = weight(_text_:91 in 4710) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.117082745 = score(doc=4710,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.19210906 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.5722036 = idf(docFreq=456, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034476317 = queryNorm
        0.60945976 = fieldWeight in 4710, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.5722036 = idf(docFreq=456, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4710)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Content
    Vgl. unter: http://andreasmengel.de/pubs/thesaurus-atlas-91.pdf.
    Series
    Forschungsbericht Nr. 91-5
  2. Hitzeroth, C.: Bibliographie zur Thesaurus-Literatur (1988) 0.01 
    0.014503214 = product of:
  0.07251607 = sum of:
    0.07251607 = weight(_text_:c in 5139) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07251607 = score(doc=5139,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.118922785 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034476317 = queryNorm
        0.6097744 = fieldWeight in 5139, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5139)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
  3. Hudon, M.: Multilingual thesaurus construction : integrating the views of different cultures in one gateway to knowledge and concepts (1997) 0.01 
    0.014192573 = product of:
  0.07096286 = sum of:
    0.07096286 = weight(_text_:91 in 475) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07096286 = score(doc=475,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19210906 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.5722036 = idf(docFreq=456, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034476317 = queryNorm
        0.3693884 = fieldWeight in 475, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.5722036 = idf(docFreq=456, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=475)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 24(1997) no.2, S.84-91
  4. Lacasta, J.; Falquet, G.; Nogueras Iso, J.N.; Zarazaga-Soria, J.: ¬A software processing chain for evaluating thesaurus quality (2017) 0.01 
    0.014192573 = product of:
  0.07096286 = sum of:
    0.07096286 = weight(_text_:91 in 3485) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07096286 = score(doc=3485,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19210906 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.5722036 = idf(docFreq=456, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034476317 = queryNorm
        0.3693884 = fieldWeight in 3485, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.5722036 = idf(docFreq=456, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3485)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Pages
    S.91-99
  5. Shiri, A.A.; Revie, C.; Chowdhury, G.: Thesaurus-enhanced search interfaces (2002) 0.01 
    0.010877411 = product of:
  0.054387055 = sum of:
    0.054387055 = weight(_text_:c in 3807) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.054387055 = score(doc=3807,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.118922785 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034476317 = queryNorm
        0.45733082 = fieldWeight in 3807, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3807)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
  6. ¬Le thésaurus aujourd'hui : Paris, 10 Janvier 1994 (1994) 0.01 
    0.010255322 = product of:
  0.05127661 = sum of:
    0.05127661 = weight(_text_:c in 8670) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05127661 = score(doc=8670,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.118922785 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034476317 = queryNorm
        0.43117565 = fieldWeight in 8670, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8670)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Content
    Enthält die Beiträge: DEGEZ, D.: Le thésaurus dans la réalité de son utilisation: les maux des mots; JULIEN, S.: Les problèmes de fusion de thésaurus: example de RESAGRI; KRUMEICH, C.: Qu'est-ce que qu'un thésaurus?; MASSE, C.: Une vision critique de L'offre logicelle pour gérer thes thésaurus; MENILLET, D.: Le thésaurus et les modes d'indexation; NORMIER, B.: Outils linguistiques et thésaurus: construction, evaluation, évolution, utilisation; REYNAUD, F.: Les problèmes de fusion de thésaurus: example d'URBANET; ROULIN, Au-delà d'un seule langue et d'un seul thésaurus: approche méthodologique
  7. Rolland-Thomas, P.: Thesaural codes : an appraisal of their use in the Library of Congress Subject Headings (1993) 0.01 
    0.009461715 = product of:
  0.04730857 = sum of:
    0.04730857 = weight(_text_:91 in 549) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04730857 = score(doc=549,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19210906 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.5722036 = idf(docFreq=456, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034476317 = queryNorm
        0.24625893 = fieldWeight in 549, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.5722036 = idf(docFreq=456, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=549)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 16(1993) no.2, S.71-91
  8. Burkart, M.: Thesaurus (2004) 0.01 
    0.009120033 = product of:
  0.022800082 = sum of:
    0.018129017 = weight(_text_:c in 2913) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018129017 = score(doc=2913,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.118922785 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034476317 = queryNorm
        0.1524436 = fieldWeight in 2913, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2913)
    0.004671065 = product of:
      0.01868426 = sum of:
        0.01868426 = weight(_text_:22 in 2913) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01868426 = score(doc=2913,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12073019 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034476317 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2913, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2913)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Der Thesaurus als Dokumentationssprache wird in der DIN 1463-1in seinen wesentlichen Merkmalen beschrieben. Dort wird der Thesaurus im informationswissenschaftlichen Sinne so definiert: "Ein Thesaurus im Bereich der Information und Dokumentation ist eine geordnete Zusammenstellung von Begriffen und ihren (vorwiegend natürlichsprachigen) Bezeichnungen, die in einem Dokumentationsgebiet zum Indexieren, Speichern und Wiederauffinden dient. Er ist durch folgende Merkmale gekennzeichnet: a) Begriffe und Bezeichnungen werden eindeutig aufeinander bezogen ("terminologische Kontrolle"), indem - Synonyme möglichst vollständig erfasst werden, - Homonyme und Polyseme besonders gekennzeichnet werden, - für jeden Begriff eine Bezeichnung (Vorzugsbenennung, Begriffsnummer oder Notation) festgelegt wird, die den Begriff eindeutig vertritt, b) Beziehungen zwischen Begriffen (repräsentiert durch ihre Bezeichnungen) werden dargestellt." Diese Definition wäre zu ergänzen um folgende: c) Der Thesaurus ist präskriptiv, indem er für seinen Geltungsbereich festlegt, welche begrifflichen Einheiten zur Verfügung gestellt werden und durch welche Bezeichnungen diese repräsentiert werden. Im Folgenden sollen die wichtigsten Elemente und Prinzipien von Thesauri und die Thesaurusmethodik vorgestellt werden. Dies kann in diesem Rahmen nur auf eine sehr kursorische und allgemeine Art und Weise geschehen. Außerdem beschränkt sich die Darstellung auf den Thesauruseinsatz im klassischen Bereich von Information und Dokumentation. Auf die Behandlung von Spezialproblemen oder auf besondere Thesaurusformen (z.B. mehrsprachige Thesauri) kann hier nicht eingegangen werden, ebenso auf die erweiterten Anforderungen, die an Thesauri im Kontext von Wissensrepräsentation oder Hypertext zu stellen sind. Allerdings überschneidet sich der klassische IuD-Bereich zunehmend mit erweiterten Formen (etwa im Rahmen von Internetanwendungen). Da der Thesaurus im dokumentarischen Sinn alle Grundelemente des Thesaurusprinzips in klarer Form aufweist, wird dieser Bereich für eine Einführung gewählt. Für eine intensivere Auseinandersetzung mit der Thematik wird die Lektüre von Wersig empfohlen, auf den sich auch die folgenden Ausführungen in weiten Teilen stützen. Eine weitere grundsätzliche Einführung in diesen Bereich, allerdings eher ausgerichtet auf die Spezifika des englischen Sprachraums, findet sich bei Lancaster.
    Date
    5. 4.2013 10:18:22
  9. Stein, R.; Saro, C.: Online-Plattform für kontrolliertes Vokabular (2006) 0.01 
    0.0090645095 = product of:
  0.045322545 = sum of:
    0.045322545 = weight(_text_:c in 3443) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.045322545 = score(doc=3443,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.118922785 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034476317 = queryNorm
        0.381109 = fieldWeight in 3443, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3443)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
  10. Naumis Pena, C.: Evaluation of educational thesauri (2006) 0.01 
    0.008973407 = product of:
  0.04486703 = sum of:
    0.04486703 = weight(_text_:c in 2257) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04486703 = score(doc=2257,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.118922785 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034476317 = queryNorm
        0.3772787 = fieldWeight in 2257, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2257)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Knowledge organization for a global learning society: Proceedings of the 9th International ISKO Conference, 4-7 July 2006, Vienna, Austria. Hrsg.: G. Budin, C. Swertz u. K. Mitgutsch
  11. Siebenkäs, A.; Markscheffel, B.: Conception of a workflow for the semi-automatic construction of a thesaurus for the German printing industry (2015) 0.01 
    0.008973407 = product of:
  0.04486703 = sum of:
    0.04486703 = weight(_text_:c in 2091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04486703 = score(doc=2091,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.118922785 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034476317 = queryNorm
        0.3772787 = fieldWeight in 2091, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2091)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Re:inventing information science in the networked society: Proceedings of the 14th International Symposium on Information Science, Zadar/Croatia, 19th-21st May 2015. Eds.: F. Pehar, C. Schloegl u. C. Wolff
  12. Mooers, C.N.: ¬The indexing language of an information retrieval system (1985) 0.01 
    0.007980029 = product of:
  0.019950071 = sum of:
    0.01586289 = weight(_text_:c in 3644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01586289 = score(doc=3644,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.118922785 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034476317 = queryNorm
        0.13338815 = fieldWeight in 3644, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3644)
    0.0040871818 = product of:
      0.016348727 = sum of:
        0.016348727 = weight(_text_:22 in 3644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016348727 = score(doc=3644,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12073019 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034476317 = queryNorm
            0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 3644, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3644)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Calvin Mooers' work toward the resolution of the problem of ambiguity in indexing went unrecognized for years. At the time he introduced the "descriptor" - a term with a very distinct meaning-indexers were, for the most part, taking index terms directly from the document, without either rationalizing them with context or normalizing them with some kind of classification. It is ironic that Mooers' term came to be attached to the popular but unsophisticated indexing methods which he was trying to root out. Simply expressed, what Mooers did was to take the dictionary definitions of terms and redefine them so clearly that they could not be used in any context except that provided by the new definition. He did, at great pains, construct such meanings for over four hundred words; disambiguation and specificity were sought after and found for these words. He proposed that all indexers adopt this method so that when the index supplied a term, it also supplied the exact meaning for that term as used in the indexed document. The same term used differently in another document would be defined differently and possibly renamed to avoid ambiguity. The disambiguation was achieved by using unabridged dictionaries and other sources of defining terminology. In practice, this tends to produce circularity in definition, that is, word A refers to word B which refers to word C which refers to word A. It was necessary, therefore, to break this chain by creating a new, definitive meaning for each word. Eventually, means such as those used by Austin (q.v.) for PRECIS achieved the same purpose, but by much more complex means than just creating a unique definition of each term. Mooers, however, was probably the first to realize how confusing undefined terminology could be. Early automatic indexers dealt with distinct disciplines and, as long as they did not stray beyond disciplinary boundaries, a quick and dirty keyword approach was satisfactory. The trouble came when attempts were made to make a combined index for two or more distinct disciplines. A number of processes have since been developed, mostly involving tagging of some kind or use of strings. Mooers' solution has rarely been considered seriously and probably would be extremely difficult to apply now because of so much interdisciplinarity. But for a specific, weIl defined field, it is still weIl worth considering. Mooers received training in mathematics and physics from the University of Minnesota and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. He was the founder of Zator Company, which developed and marketed a coded card information retrieval system, and of Rockford Research, Inc., which engages in research in information science. He is the inventor of the TRAC computer language.
    Footnote
    Original in: Information retrieval today: papers presented at an Institute conducted by the Library School and the Center for Continuation Study, University of Minnesota, Sept. 19-22, 1962. Ed. by Wesley Simonton. Minneapolis, Minn.: The Center, 1963. S.21-36.
  13. Roulin, C.: Sub-thesauri as part of a metathesaurus (1992) 0.01 
    0.007251607 = product of:
  0.036258034 = sum of:
    0.036258034 = weight(_text_:c in 2112) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.036258034 = score(doc=2112,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.118922785 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034476317 = queryNorm
        0.3048872 = fieldWeight in 2112, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2112)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
  14. Gillman, P.: Transferring text (1993) 0.01 
    0.007251607 = product of:
  0.036258034 = sum of:
    0.036258034 = weight(_text_:c in 6246) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.036258034 = score(doc=6246,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.118922785 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034476317 = queryNorm
        0.3048872 = fieldWeight in 6246, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6246)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    C and L applications. 6(1993) no.9, S.9-11
  15. Williamson, N.J.: Thesauri in the digital age : stability and dynamism in their development and use (2000) 0.01 
    0.007251607 = product of:
  0.036258034 = sum of:
    0.036258034 = weight(_text_:c in 138) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.036258034 = score(doc=138,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.118922785 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034476317 = queryNorm
        0.3048872 = fieldWeight in 138, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=138)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Dynamism and stability in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the 6th International ISKO-Conference, 10-13 July 2000, Toronto, Canada. Ed.: C. Beghtol et al
  16. Tudhope, D.; Binding, C.: Faceted thesauri (2008) 0.01 
    0.007251607 = product of:
  0.036258034 = sum of:
    0.036258034 = weight(_text_:c in 1855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.036258034 = score(doc=1855,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.118922785 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034476317 = queryNorm
        0.3048872 = fieldWeight in 1855, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1855)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
  17. Skrubbeltrang, C.: Anvendelse af brugerassociationer ved tesauruskonstruktion (1993) 0.01 
    0.006345156 = product of:
  0.03172578 = sum of:
    0.03172578 = weight(_text_:c in 7330) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03172578 = score(doc=7330,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.118922785 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034476317 = queryNorm
        0.2667763 = fieldWeight in 7330, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7330)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
  18. Petersen, T.: Information on images : the Art and Architecture Thesaurus (1989) 0.01 
    0.006345156 = product of:
  0.03172578 = sum of:
    0.03172578 = weight(_text_:c in 3565) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03172578 = score(doc=3565,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.118922785 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034476317 = queryNorm
        0.2667763 = fieldWeight in 3565, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3565)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    National Online Meeting. Proceedings 1989, New York, 9.-11.5.1989. Ed. by C. Nixon and L. Padgett
  19. Cote, C.: Creation d'un thesaurus bilingue en gerontologie et geriatrie : rapport d'etape (1997) 0.01 
    0.006345156 = product of:
  0.03172578 = sum of:
    0.03172578 = weight(_text_:c in 985) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03172578 = score(doc=985,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.118922785 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034476317 = queryNorm
        0.2667763 = fieldWeight in 985, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=985)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
  20. Keränen, S.: Equivalence and focus of translation in multicultural thesaurus construction (2006) 0.01 
    0.006345156 = product of:
  0.03172578 = sum of:
    0.03172578 = weight(_text_:c in 237) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03172578 = score(doc=237,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.118922785 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034476317 = queryNorm
        0.2667763 = fieldWeight in 237, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=237)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Knowledge organization for a global learning society: Proceedings of the 9th International ISKO Conference, 4-7 July 2006, Vienna, Austria. Hrsg.: G. Budin, C. Swertz u. K. Mitgutsch

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 48
  • d 12
  • f 6
  • dk 1
  • pt 1
  • sp 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 57
  • el 6
  • r 3
  • s 3
  • m 2
  • ? 1
  • n 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications