Search (76 results, page 1 of 4)

0.028373769 = product of:
  0.17024261 = sum of:
    0.17024261 = product of:
      0.34048522 = sum of:
        0.34048522 = weight(_text_:641 in 2703) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.34048522 = score(doc=2703,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.34993643 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.806516 = idf(docFreq=17, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03973608 = queryNorm
            0.97299165 = fieldWeight in 2703, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.806516 = idf(docFreq=17, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2703)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Footnote

Rez. in: ABI-Technik 14(1994) H.3, S.267-268 (D. Schmidmaier); ZfBB 42(1995) H.6, S.641-643 (G. Ewert)

0.019139756 = product of:
  0.057419263 = sum of:
    0.038576346 = weight(_text_:b in 3599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.038576346 = score(doc=3599,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14078343 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03973608 = queryNorm
        0.27401197 = fieldWeight in 3599, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3599)
    0.018842915 = product of:
      0.03768583 = sum of:
        0.03768583 = weight(_text_:22 in 3599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03768583 = score(doc=3599,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13914898 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03973608 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3599, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3599)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)

Date

10. 9.2000 17:38:22

Type

b

0.0146957515 = product of:
  0.08817451 = sum of:
    0.08817451 = weight(_text_:b in 2430) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08817451 = score(doc=2430,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14078343 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03973608 = queryNorm
        0.6263131 = fieldWeight in 2430, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2430)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

0.0146957515 = product of:
  0.08817451 = sum of:
    0.08817451 = weight(_text_:b in 4476) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08817451 = score(doc=4476,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14078343 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03973608 = queryNorm
        0.6263131 = fieldWeight in 4476, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4476)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Type

b

0.013671255 = product of:
  0.041013762 = sum of:
    0.027554534 = weight(_text_:b in 56) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.027554534 = score(doc=56,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14078343 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03973608 = queryNorm
        0.19572285 = fieldWeight in 56, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=56)
    0.013459226 = product of:
      0.026918452 = sum of:
        0.026918452 = weight(_text_:22 in 56) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026918452 = score(doc=56,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13914898 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03973608 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 56, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=56)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)

Abstract

The study reported here investigated the query expansion behavior of end-users interacting with a thesaurus-enhanced search system on the Web. Two groups, namely academic staff and postgraduate students, were recruited into this study. Data were collected from 90 searches performed by 30 users using the OVID interface to the CAB abstracts database. Data-gathering techniques included questionnaires, screen capturing software, and interviews. The results presented here relate to issues of search-topic and search-term characteristics, number and types of expanded queries, usefulness of thesaurus terms, and behavioral differences between academic staff and postgraduate students in their interaction. The key conclusions drawn were that (a) academic staff chose more narrow and synonymous terms than did postgraduate students, who generally selected broader and related terms; (b) topic complexity affected users' interaction with the thesaurus in that complex topics required more query expansion and search term selection; (c) users' prior topic-search experience appeared to have a significant effect on their selection and evaluation of thesaurus terms; (d) in 50% of the searches where additional terms were suggested from the thesaurus, users stated that they had not been aware of the terms at the beginning of the search; this observation was particularly noticeable in the case of postgraduate students.

Date

22. 7.2006 16:32:43

0.012858782 = product of:
  0.07715269 = sum of:
    0.07715269 = weight(_text_:b in 800) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07715269 = score(doc=800,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14078343 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03973608 = queryNorm
        0.54802394 = fieldWeight in 800, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=800)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

0.012858782 = product of:
  0.07715269 = sum of:
    0.07715269 = weight(_text_:b in 6825) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07715269 = score(doc=6825,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14078343 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03973608 = queryNorm
        0.54802394 = fieldWeight in 6825, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6825)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

0.011948761 = product of:
  0.07169256 = sum of:
    0.07169256 = weight(_text_:deutschland in 408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07169256 = score(doc=408,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19192345 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.829954 = idf(docFreq=959, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03973608 = queryNorm
        0.3735477 = fieldWeight in 408, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.829954 = idf(docFreq=959, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=408)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Abstract

Deutschland unterliegt einem demographischen Wandel, der Anteil der über 50-Jährigen nimmt deutlich zu. Internetnutzer mit einem Alter von 50 Jahren oder älter werden als Silver Surfer bezeichnet. Im Zuge der fortschreitenden Digitalisierung gilt der kompetente Umgang mit dem Internet als Schlüsselqualifikation zur Erleichterung und Bereicherung des Lebens. Es werden Ergebnisse einer Befragung vorgestellt, die zu beantworten versucht, ob und in welchem Umfang Silver Surfer über Kompetenz im Umgang mit dem Internet verfügen. Bei der Befragung findet der Persona-Ansatz aus dem Bereich der Softwareentwicklung Anwendung. Ergebnis der Studie ist, dass die Generation 50+ unterschiedliche Interneterfahrungen aufweist und nicht als homogene Gruppe betrachtet werden kann.

0.011021813 = product of:
  0.06613088 = sum of:
    0.06613088 = weight(_text_:b in 2063) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06613088 = score(doc=2063,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14078343 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03973608 = queryNorm
        0.46973482 = fieldWeight in 2063, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2063)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

0.011021813 = product of:
  0.06613088 = sum of:
    0.06613088 = weight(_text_:b in 2273) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06613088 = score(doc=2273,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14078343 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03973608 = queryNorm
        0.46973482 = fieldWeight in 2273, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2273)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

0.011021813 = product of:
  0.06613088 = sum of:
    0.06613088 = weight(_text_:b in 2275) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06613088 = score(doc=2275,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14078343 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03973608 = queryNorm
        0.46973482 = fieldWeight in 2275, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2275)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

0.0077935993 = product of:
  0.046761595 = sum of:
    0.046761595 = weight(_text_:b in 1336) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.046761595 = score(doc=1336,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.14078343 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03973608 = queryNorm
        0.3321527 = fieldWeight in 1336, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1336)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

0.0073478757 = product of:
  0.044087254 = sum of:
    0.044087254 = weight(_text_:b in 647) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.044087254 = score(doc=647,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14078343 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03973608 = queryNorm
        0.31315655 = fieldWeight in 647, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=647)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

0.0073478757 = product of:
  0.044087254 = sum of:
    0.044087254 = weight(_text_:b in 816) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.044087254 = score(doc=816,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14078343 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03973608 = queryNorm
        0.31315655 = fieldWeight in 816, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=816)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

0.0073478757 = product of:
  0.044087254 = sum of:
    0.044087254 = weight(_text_:b in 3826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.044087254 = score(doc=3826,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14078343 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03973608 = queryNorm
        0.31315655 = fieldWeight in 3826, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3826)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Source

Online information 95: Proceedings of the 19th International online information meeting, London, 5-7 December 1995. Ed.: D.I. Raitt u. B. Jeapes

0.0073478757 = product of:
  0.044087254 = sum of:
    0.044087254 = weight(_text_:b in 936) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.044087254 = score(doc=936,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14078343 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03973608 = queryNorm
        0.31315655 = fieldWeight in 936, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=936)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

0.0064946655 = product of:
  0.038967993 = sum of:
    0.038967993 = weight(_text_:b in 4129) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.038967993 = score(doc=4129,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.14078343 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03973608 = queryNorm
        0.2767939 = fieldWeight in 4129, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4129)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Abstract

This study examined how searchers interact with a web-based, faceted library catalog when conducting exploratory searches. It applied multiple methods, including eye tracking and stimulated recall interviews, to investigate important aspects of faceted search interface use, specifically: (a) searcher gaze behavior-what components of the interface searchers look at; (b) how gaze behavior differs when training is and is not provided; (c) how gaze behavior changes as searchers become familiar with the interface; and (d) how gaze behavior differs depending on the stage of the search process. The results confirm previous findings that facets account for approximately 10-30% of interface use. They show that providing a 60-second video demonstration increased searcher use of facets. However, searcher use of the facets did not evolve during the study session, which suggests that searchers may not, on their own, rapidly apply the faceted interfaces. The findings also suggest that searcher use of interface elements varied by the stage of their search during the session, with higher use of facets during decision-making stages. These findings will be of interest to librarians and interface designers who wish to maximize the value of faceted searching for patrons, as well as to researchers who study search behavior.

0.0064946655 = product of:
  0.038967993 = sum of:
    0.038967993 = weight(_text_:b in 3593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.038967993 = score(doc=3593,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.14078343 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03973608 = queryNorm
        0.2767939 = fieldWeight in 3593, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3593)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Abstract

We present the first systematic study of the influence of time on user judgements for rankings and relevance grades of web search engine results. The goal of this study is to evaluate the change in user assessment of search results and explore how users' judgements change. To this end, we conducted a large-scale user study with 86 participants who evaluated 2 different queries and 4 diverse result sets twice with an interval of 2 months. To analyze the results we investigate whether 2 types of patterns of user behavior from the theory of categorical thinking hold for the case of evaluation of search results: (a) coarseness and (b) locality. To quantify these patterns we devised 2 new measures of change in user judgements and distinguish between local (when users swap between close ranks and relevance values) and nonlocal changes. Two types of judgements were considered in this study: (a) relevance on a 4-point scale, and (b) ranking on a 10-point scale without ties. We found that users tend to change their judgements of the results over time in about 50% of cases for relevance and in 85% of cases for ranking. However, the majority of these changes were local.

0.006429391 = product of:
  0.038576346 = sum of:
    0.038576346 = weight(_text_:b in 1071) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.038576346 = score(doc=1071,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14078343 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03973608 = queryNorm
        0.27401197 = fieldWeight in 1071, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1071)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

0.006429391 = product of:
  0.038576346 = sum of:
    0.038576346 = weight(_text_:b in 1526) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.038576346 = score(doc=1526,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14078343 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03973608 = queryNorm
        0.27401197 = fieldWeight in 1526, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1526)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)