Search (31 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Suchtaktik"
  1. Morse, P.M.: Search theory and browsing (1970) 0.03
    0.028041592 = product of:
      0.056083184 = sum of:
        0.056083184 = product of:
          0.11216637 = sum of:
            0.11216637 = weight(_text_:22 in 1448) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11216637 = score(doc=1448,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18119352 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051742528 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 1448, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1448)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 5.2005 19:53:09
  2. Morse, P.M.: Browsing and search theory (1973) 0.02
    0.024536394 = product of:
      0.049072787 = sum of:
        0.049072787 = product of:
          0.098145574 = sum of:
            0.098145574 = weight(_text_:22 in 3339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.098145574 = score(doc=3339,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18119352 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051742528 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3339, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3339)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 5.2005 19:52:29
  3. Branch, J.L.: Investigating the information-seeking process of adolescents : the value of using think alouds and think afters (2000) 0.02
    0.024536394 = product of:
      0.049072787 = sum of:
        0.049072787 = product of:
          0.098145574 = sum of:
            0.098145574 = weight(_text_:22 in 3924) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.098145574 = score(doc=3924,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18119352 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051742528 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3924, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3924)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Library and information science research. 22(2000) no.4, S.371-382
  4. Keen, E.M.: Some aspects of proximity searching in text retrieval systems (1992) 0.02
    0.017994521 = product of:
      0.035989042 = sum of:
        0.035989042 = product of:
          0.071978085 = sum of:
            0.071978085 = weight(_text_:software in 6190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.071978085 = score(doc=6190,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20527047 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051742528 = queryNorm
                0.35064998 = fieldWeight in 6190, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6190)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Describes and evaluates the proximity search facilities in external online systems and in-house retrieval software. Discusses and illustrates capabilities, syntax and circumstances of use. Presents measurements of the overheads required by proximity for storage, record input time and search time. The search strategy narrowing effect of proximity is illustrated by recall and precision test results. Usage and problems lead to a number of design ideas for better implementation: some based on existing Boolean strategies, one on the use of weighted proximity to automatically produce ranked output. A comparison of Boolean, quorum and proximate term pairs distance is included
  5. Pejtersen, A.M.: Design of a classification scheme for fiction based on an analysis of actual user-librarian communication, and use of the scheme for control of librarians' search strategies (1980) 0.02
    0.017525995 = product of:
      0.03505199 = sum of:
        0.03505199 = product of:
          0.07010398 = sum of:
            0.07010398 = weight(_text_:22 in 5835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07010398 = score(doc=5835,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18119352 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051742528 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5835, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5835)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    5. 8.2006 13:22:44
  6. Whitmire, E.: ¬The relationship between undergraduates' epistemological beliefs, reflective judgment, and their information-seeking behavior (2004) 0.01
    0.013495891 = product of:
      0.026991783 = sum of:
        0.026991783 = product of:
          0.053983565 = sum of:
            0.053983565 = weight(_text_:software in 2561) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.053983565 = score(doc=2561,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20527047 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051742528 = queryNorm
                0.2629875 = fieldWeight in 2561, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2561)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    During the fall 2001 semester 15 first-year undergraduates were interviewed about their information-seeking behavior. Undergraduates completed a short-answer questionnaire, the Measure of Epistemological Reflection, measuring their epistemological beliefs and searched the Web and an online public access catalog using tasks from the Reflective Judgment Interview that assessed their reflective judgment level. Undergraduates talked aloud while searching digital environments about the decisions they were making about the information they encountered while transaction analyses software (Lotus ScreenCam) recorded both their search moves and their decision-making through verbal protocol analysis. Analyses included examining the relationship between undergraduates' epistemological beliefs and reflective judgment and how they searched for information in these digital environments. Results indicated that there was a relationship between epistemological beliefs and reflective judgment and information-seeking behavior. Undergraduates' at higher stages of epistemological development exhibited the ability to handle conflicting information sources and to recognize authoritative information sources.
  7. Jansen, B.J.; Booth, D.L.; Spink, A.: Determining the informational, navigational, and transactional intent of Web queries (2008) 0.01
    0.013495891 = product of:
      0.026991783 = sum of:
        0.026991783 = product of:
          0.053983565 = sum of:
            0.053983565 = weight(_text_:software in 2091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.053983565 = score(doc=2091,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20527047 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051742528 = queryNorm
                0.2629875 = fieldWeight in 2091, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2091)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    In this paper, we define and present a comprehensive classification of user intent for Web searching. The classification consists of three hierarchical levels of informational, navigational, and transactional intent. After deriving attributes of each, we then developed a software application that automatically classified queries using a Web search engine log of over a million and a half queries submitted by several hundred thousand users. Our findings show that more than 80% of Web queries are informational in nature, with about 10% each being navigational and transactional. In order to validate the accuracy of our algorithm, we manually coded 400 queries and compared the results from this manual classification to the results determined by the automated method. This comparison showed that the automatic classification has an accuracy of 74%. Of the remaining 25% of the queries, the user intent is vague or multi-faceted, pointing to the need for probabilistic classification. We discuss how search engines can use knowledge of user intent to provide more targeted and relevant results in Web searching.
  8. Hsieh-Yee, I.: Search tactics of Web users in searching for texts, graphics, known items and subjects : a search simulation study (1998) 0.01
    0.010515597 = product of:
      0.021031193 = sum of:
        0.021031193 = product of:
          0.042062387 = sum of:
            0.042062387 = weight(_text_:22 in 2404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042062387 = score(doc=2404,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18119352 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051742528 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2404, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2404)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    25.12.1998 19:22:31
  9. Limberg, L.: Three conceptions of information seeking and use (1999) 0.01
    0.010515597 = product of:
      0.021031193 = sum of:
        0.021031193 = product of:
          0.042062387 = sum of:
            0.042062387 = weight(_text_:22 in 281) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042062387 = score(doc=281,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18119352 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051742528 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 281, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=281)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2002 9:53:10
  10. Lin, S.-j.; Belkin, N.: Validation of a model of information seeking over multiple search sessions (2005) 0.01
    0.010515597 = product of:
      0.021031193 = sum of:
        0.021031193 = product of:
          0.042062387 = sum of:
            0.042062387 = weight(_text_:22 in 3450) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042062387 = score(doc=3450,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18119352 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051742528 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3450, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3450)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    10. 4.2005 14:52:22
  11. Koopmans, N.I.: What's your question? : The need for research information from the perspective of different user groups (2002) 0.01
    0.010515597 = product of:
      0.021031193 = sum of:
        0.021031193 = product of:
          0.042062387 = sum of:
            0.042062387 = weight(_text_:22 in 3612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042062387 = score(doc=3612,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18119352 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051742528 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3612, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3612)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    2. 7.2005 12:22:50
  12. Crestani, F.; Du, H.: Written versus spoken queries : a qualitative and quantitative comparative analysis (2006) 0.01
    0.010515597 = product of:
      0.021031193 = sum of:
        0.021031193 = product of:
          0.042062387 = sum of:
            0.042062387 = weight(_text_:22 in 5047) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042062387 = score(doc=5047,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18119352 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051742528 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5047, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5047)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    5. 6.2006 11:22:23
  13. Xu, Y.: ¬The dynamics of interactive information retrieval behavior : part I: an activity theory perspective (2007) 0.01
    0.010515597 = product of:
      0.021031193 = sum of:
        0.021031193 = product of:
          0.042062387 = sum of:
            0.042062387 = weight(_text_:22 in 331) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042062387 = score(doc=331,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18119352 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051742528 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 331, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=331)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    27. 5.2007 13:55:22
  14. Lee, S.-S.; Theng, Y.-L.; Goh, D.H.-L.: Creative information seeking : part II: empirical verification (2007) 0.01
    0.010515597 = product of:
      0.021031193 = sum of:
        0.021031193 = product of:
          0.042062387 = sum of:
            0.042062387 = weight(_text_:22 in 813) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042062387 = score(doc=813,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18119352 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051742528 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 813, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=813)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    23.12.2007 12:22:16
  15. Saastamoinen, M.; Järvelin, K.: Search task features in work tasks of varying types and complexity (2017) 0.01
    0.010515597 = product of:
      0.021031193 = sum of:
        0.021031193 = product of:
          0.042062387 = sum of:
            0.042062387 = weight(_text_:22 in 3589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042062387 = score(doc=3589,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18119352 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051742528 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3589, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3589)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Information searching in practice seldom is an end in itself. In work, work task (WT) performance forms the context, which information searching should serve. Therefore, information retrieval (IR) systems development/evaluation should take the WT context into account. The present paper analyzes how WT features: task complexity and task types, affect information searching in authentic work: the types of information needs, search processes, and search media. We collected data on 22 information professionals in authentic work situations in three organization types: city administration, universities, and companies. The data comprise 286 WTs and 420 search tasks (STs). The data include transaction logs, video recordings, daily questionnaires, interviews. and observation. The data were analyzed quantitatively. Even if the participants used a range of search media, most STs were simple throughout the data, and up to 42% of WTs did not include searching. WT's effects on STs are not straightforward: different WT types react differently to WT complexity. Due to the simplicity of authentic searching, the WT/ST types in interactive IR experiments should be reconsidered.
  16. Stacey, Alison; Stacey, Adrian: Effective information retrieval from the Internet : an advanced user's guide (2004) 0.01
    0.008997261 = product of:
      0.017994521 = sum of:
        0.017994521 = product of:
          0.035989042 = sum of:
            0.035989042 = weight(_text_:software in 4497) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035989042 = score(doc=4497,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20527047 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051742528 = queryNorm
                0.17532499 = fieldWeight in 4497, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4497)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Key Features - Importantly, the book enables readers to develop strategies which will continue to be useful despite the rapidly-evolving state of the Internet and Internet technologies - it is not about technological `tricks'. - Enables readers to be aware of and compensate for bias and errors which are ubiquitous an the Internet. - Provides contemporary information an the deficiencies in web skills of novice users as well as practical techniques for teaching such users. The Authors Dr Alison Stacey works at the Learning Resource Centre, Cambridge Regional College. Dr Adrian Stacey, formerly based at Cambridge University, is a software programmer. Readership The book is aimed at a wide range of librarians and other information professionals who need to retrieve information from the Internet efficiently, to evaluate their confidence in the information they retrieve and/or to train others to use the Internet. It is primarily aimed at intermediate to advanced users of the Internet. Contents Fundamentals of information retrieval from the Internet - why learn web searching technique; types of information requests; patterns for information retrieval; leveraging the technology: Search term choice: pinpointing information an the web - why choose queries carefully; making search terms work together; how to pick search terms; finding the 'unfindable': Blas an the Internet - importance of bias; sources of bias; usergenerated bias: selecting information with which you already agree; assessing and compensating for bias; case studies: Query reformulation and longer term strategies - how to interact with your search engine; foraging for information; long term information retrieval: using the Internet to find trends; automating searches: how to make your machine do your work: Assessing the quality of results- how to assess and ensure quality: The novice user and teaching internet skills - novice users and their problems with the web; case study: research in a college library; interpreting 'second hand' web information.
  17. Byström, K.: Information seekers in context : an analysis of the 'doer' in INSU studies (1999) 0.01
    0.008762998 = product of:
      0.017525995 = sum of:
        0.017525995 = product of:
          0.03505199 = sum of:
            0.03505199 = weight(_text_:22 in 297) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03505199 = score(doc=297,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18119352 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051742528 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 297, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=297)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2002 9:55:52
  18. Vakkari, P.; Pennanen, M.; Serola, S.: Changes of search terms and tactics while writing a research proposal : a longitudinal case study (2003) 0.01
    0.008762998 = product of:
      0.017525995 = sum of:
        0.017525995 = product of:
          0.03505199 = sum of:
            0.03505199 = weight(_text_:22 in 1073) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03505199 = score(doc=1073,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18119352 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051742528 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1073, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1073)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The study analyses how students' growing understanding of the topic and search experience were related to their choice of search tactics and terms while preparing a research proposal for a small empirical study. In addition to that, the findings of the study are used to test Vakkari's (2001) theory of task-based IR. The research subjects were 22 students of psychology attending a seminar for preparing the proposal. They made a search for their task in PsychINFO database at the beginning and end of the seminar. Data were collected in several ways. A pre- and post-search interview was conducted in both sessions. The students were asked to think aloud in the sessions. This was recorded as were the transaction logs. The results show that search experience was slightly related to the change of facets. Although the students' vocabulary of the topic grew generating an increased use of specific terms between the sessions, their use of search tactics and operators remained fairly constant. There was no correlation between the terms and tactics used and the total number of useful references found. By comparing these results with the findings of relevant earlier studies the conclusion was drawn that domain knowledge has an impact on searching assuming that users have a sufficient command of the system used. This implies that the tested theory of task-based IR is valid on condition that the searchers are experienced. It is suggested that the theory should be enriched by including search experience in its scope.
  19. Mansourian, Y.: Contextual elements and conceptual components of information visibility on the web (2008) 0.01
    0.008762998 = product of:
      0.017525995 = sum of:
        0.017525995 = product of:
          0.03505199 = sum of:
            0.03505199 = weight(_text_:22 in 2603) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03505199 = score(doc=2603,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18119352 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051742528 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2603, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2603)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    1. 1.2009 10:22:40
  20. Aloteibi, S.; Sanderson, M.: Analyzing geographic query reformulation : an exploratory study (2014) 0.01
    0.008762998 = product of:
      0.017525995 = sum of:
        0.017525995 = product of:
          0.03505199 = sum of:
            0.03505199 = weight(_text_:22 in 1177) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03505199 = score(doc=1177,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18119352 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051742528 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1177, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1177)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    26. 1.2014 18:48:22

Years

Languages

  • e 30
  • d 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 29
  • m 2