Search (1102 results, page 1 of 56)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × theme_ss:"Informationsdienstleistungen"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  1. Sühl-Strohmenger, W.: ¬Das Bibliothekswesen als eigene wissenschaftliche Disziplin : Was Studierende in »Einführungen zum wissenschaftlichen Arbeiten« über Bibliotheken und Literaturrecherche so alles erfahren (2005) 0.08
    0.07928856 = product of:
      0.23786567 = sum of:
        0.023178069 = weight(_text_:und in 1314) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023178069 = score(doc=1314,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.4848303 = fieldWeight in 1314, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1314)
        0.016574297 = product of:
          0.033148594 = sum of:
            0.033148594 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 1314) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.033148594 = score(doc=1314,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09615103 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021569785 = queryNorm
                0.34475547 = fieldWeight in 1314, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1314)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.033148594 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 1314) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033148594 = score(doc=1314,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09615103 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.34475547 = fieldWeight in 1314, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1314)
        0.033148594 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 1314) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033148594 = score(doc=1314,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09615103 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.34475547 = fieldWeight in 1314, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1314)
        0.0061733257 = weight(_text_:in in 1314) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0061733257 = score(doc=1314,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.21040362 = fieldWeight in 1314, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1314)
        0.023178069 = weight(_text_:und in 1314) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023178069 = score(doc=1314,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.4848303 = fieldWeight in 1314, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1314)
        0.033497587 = weight(_text_:bibliotheken in 1314) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033497587 = score(doc=1314,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08127756 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.41213822 = fieldWeight in 1314, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1314)
        0.033497587 = weight(_text_:bibliotheken in 1314) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033497587 = score(doc=1314,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08127756 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.41213822 = fieldWeight in 1314, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1314)
        0.033497587 = weight(_text_:bibliotheken in 1314) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033497587 = score(doc=1314,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08127756 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.41213822 = fieldWeight in 1314, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1314)
        0.0019719584 = weight(_text_:s in 1314) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0019719584 = score(doc=1314,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 1314, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1314)
      0.33333334 = coord(10/30)
    
    Abstract
    Bibliotheks- und Informationskompetenz können Studierende im Rahmen von Einführungs- und Schulungsangeboten der Hochschulbibliothek erlangen, jedoch gibt es daneben auch andere Hilfsmittel, die eventuell noch mehr Einfluss haben als die von kundigen Bibliothekar(inn)en durchgeführten Kurse. Infrage kommen dafür vor allem einschlägige Lehrbücher zur Einführung in das wissenschaftliche Arbeiten beziehungsweise zur Anfertigung von Haus- und Examensarbeiten, denn diese beinhalten mehr oder minder ausführliche Abschnitte über Bibliotheken, die Bibliotheksbenutzung und die Literaturrecherche. Ihre Bedeutung für das Studium, die Examensvorbereitung und auch die Promotion ist kaum zu überschätzen, weil sie in der Regel von Hochschuldozenten, teilweise von Professoren, verfasst sind und deshalb in der Lehre gern verwendet und empfohlen werden.
    Source
    BuB. 57(2005) H.10, S.735-743
  2. Ortwein, A.: InfoPoint (2005) 0.05
    0.050015252 = product of:
      0.1667175 = sum of:
        0.017520973 = weight(_text_:und in 4319) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017520973 = score(doc=4319,freq=28.0), product of:
            0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.36649725 = fieldWeight in 4319, product of:
              5.2915025 = tf(freq=28.0), with freq of:
                28.0 = termFreq=28.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4319)
        0.003527615 = weight(_text_:in in 4319) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.003527615 = score(doc=4319,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.120230645 = fieldWeight in 4319, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4319)
        0.02662638 = weight(_text_:einzelnen in 4319) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02662638 = score(doc=4319,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1139978 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.285069 = idf(docFreq=608, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.23356925 = fieldWeight in 4319, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.285069 = idf(docFreq=608, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4319)
        0.017520973 = weight(_text_:und in 4319) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017520973 = score(doc=4319,freq=28.0), product of:
            0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.36649725 = fieldWeight in 4319, product of:
              5.2915025 = tf(freq=28.0), with freq of:
                28.0 = termFreq=28.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4319)
        0.023443429 = weight(_text_:bibliotheken in 4319) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023443429 = score(doc=4319,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.08127756 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.28843668 = fieldWeight in 4319, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4319)
        0.030064424 = weight(_text_:deutsche in 4319) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030064424 = score(doc=4319,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.10186133 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7224083 = idf(docFreq=1068, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.29515052 = fieldWeight in 4319, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.7224083 = idf(docFreq=1068, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4319)
        0.023443429 = weight(_text_:bibliotheken in 4319) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023443429 = score(doc=4319,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.08127756 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.28843668 = fieldWeight in 4319, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4319)
        0.023443429 = weight(_text_:bibliotheken in 4319) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023443429 = score(doc=4319,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.08127756 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.28843668 = fieldWeight in 4319, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4319)
        0.0011268335 = weight(_text_:s in 4319) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0011268335 = score(doc=4319,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.048049565 = fieldWeight in 4319, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4319)
      0.3 = coord(9/30)
    
    Abstract
    Seit Oktober 2004 nimmt Die Deutsche Bibliothek als eine von fünf Institutionen am neu eingerichteten virtuellen Auskunftsdienst InfoPoint teil. Weitere Kooperationspartner sind die Stadtbücherei Frankfurt am Main, die Universitätsbibliothek Johann Christian Senckenberg, die USA-Bibliothek der Universität Mainz und die HeBIS-Verbundzentrale als Gruppenadministrator und -koordinator. InfoPoint ist Teil des globalen Informationsnetzwerks QuestionPoint. Ausgangspunkt für die Gründung dieser Onlineauskunft für die Rhein-Main-Region war ein von Diana Kresh (Leiterin der Public Service Collections der Library of Congress in Washington) im August 2003 in der Deutschen Bibliothek Frankfurt am Main gehaltener Vortrag zu dem Thema »Reference in a Digital World«, Darin stellte sie den Auskunftsservice QuestionPoint vor, der aus dem Projekt »Collaborative Digital Reference Service« der Library of Congress (LoC) hervorgegangen ist und begeisterte mit dem Thema sofort alle Anwesenden. Im Herbst 2003 gründete sich daraufhin die »QuestionPoint-Arbeitsgruppe Rhein-Main«, die im Mai 2004 ihr Konzept für einen virtuellen Auskunftsdienst den Entscheidungsträgern der einzelnen Teilnehmerbibliotheken vorlegte. Im Juni 2004 erfolgte die offizielle Gründung eines Konsortiums und im Oktober fiel der Startschuss zur Betriebsaufnahme von InfoPoint. QuestionPoint (QP) ist ein von der LoC und dem Bibliotheksdienstleister Online Computer Library Center (OCLC) gemeinschaftlich entwickelter Onlineauskunftsservice mit dem Ziel, ein weltweites Netzwerk von kooperierenden Bibliotheken zu bilden, um auf das breite Wissensspektrum der beteiligten Mitgliedsinstitutionen zugreifen zu können. Verantwortlich für die bibliothekarischen Anforderungen und Vorgaben ist die LoC, die technische Realisierung liegt bei OCLC, wo auch die Datenbank des Dienstes lokalisiert ist. Grundlage bildet eine leistungsfähige Software mit breitem Funktionsspektrum, die sowohl für die anfragenden Nutzerinnen und Nutzer als auch für die Auskunft gebenden Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare alle Stufen und Schritte eines virtuellen Auskunftsvorgangs dokumentiert und transparent macht. Darüber hinaus können auf Wunsch moderne Kommunikationstechniken wie Chat und Webcams innerhalb des Systems ergänzend eingebunden werden. Mit Stand Februar 2005 sind 955 Institutionen aus zahlreichen Ländern weltweit an QP beteiligt. Darunter befinden sich die verschiedensten Bibliothekstypen, wie Nationalbibliotheken, Hochschulbibliotheken, öffentliche Bibliotheken, Spezialbibliotheken sowie zahlreiche nicht bibliothekarische Einrichtungen. Folgende in Deutschland ansässige Institutionen sind neben dem InfoPoint-Konsortium an OP beteiligt: Die Deutsche Zentralbibliothek für Wirtschaftswissenschaften Kiel, die Niedersächsische Staats- und Universitätsbibliothek Göttingen, die Zentral- und Landesbibliothek Berlin, das Informations-, Kommunikations- und Medienzentrum Cottbus, die Universitätsbibliothek Chemnitz sowie die U.S. Army Europe Regional Library Heidelberg.
    Source
    Dialog mit Bibliotheken. 17(2005) H.2, S.14-18
  3. Richter, K.: Weimarer Schüler erobern Wissen (2007) 0.04
    0.043324597 = product of:
      0.16246723 = sum of:
        0.019650163 = weight(_text_:und in 398) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019650163 = score(doc=398,freq=46.0), product of:
            0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.41103485 = fieldWeight in 398, product of:
              6.78233 = tf(freq=46.0), with freq of:
                46.0 = termFreq=46.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=398)
        0.004880443 = weight(_text_:in in 398) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004880443 = score(doc=398,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.16633868 = fieldWeight in 398, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=398)
        0.023298083 = weight(_text_:einzelnen in 398) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023298083 = score(doc=398,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1139978 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.285069 = idf(docFreq=608, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.20437309 = fieldWeight in 398, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.285069 = idf(docFreq=608, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=398)
        0.019650163 = weight(_text_:und in 398) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019650163 = score(doc=398,freq=46.0), product of:
            0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.41103485 = fieldWeight in 398, product of:
              6.78233 = tf(freq=46.0), with freq of:
                46.0 = termFreq=46.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=398)
        0.03133413 = weight(_text_:bibliotheken in 398) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03133413 = score(doc=398,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.08127756 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.38552004 = fieldWeight in 398, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=398)
        0.03133413 = weight(_text_:bibliotheken in 398) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03133413 = score(doc=398,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.08127756 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.38552004 = fieldWeight in 398, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=398)
        0.03133413 = weight(_text_:bibliotheken in 398) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03133413 = score(doc=398,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.08127756 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.38552004 = fieldWeight in 398, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=398)
        9.859792E-4 = weight(_text_:s in 398) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          9.859792E-4 = score(doc=398,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.04204337 = fieldWeight in 398, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=398)
      0.26666668 = coord(8/30)
    
    Abstract
    Weimarer Schülern und Lehrern eine frühzeitige und kontinuierliche Orientierung bei der Informationsbeschaffung zu geben - diesen Leitgedanken verfolgen die Weimarer Bibliotheken seit Anfang 2006 in diversen Projekten.
    Content
    "Zunächst wurde ein gemeinsamer Flyer »Wissen erobern. Schüler entdecken Weimarer Bibliotheken« erarbeitet, der die wichtigsten Informationen über die Bibliotheken vor Ort enthält. Der Flyer wurde in Kooperation mit dem Staatlichen Schulamt Weimar zum Anlass genommen, um den unmittelbaren Kontakt zu Fachberatern, Seminarfachlehrern an Gymnasien und Projektlehrern an Regelschulen zu pflegen und sowohl Unterstützungsangebote als auch Kooperationsmöglichkeiten der Bibliotheken aufzuzeigen. Aus diesen Begegnungen entwickelte sich die Idee, alle Schüler der gymnasialen Oberstufe im Rahmen des in Thüringen obligatorischen Seminarfachs praktisch über die Recherchemöglichkeiten der Weimarer Bibliotheken während einer Vorlesung zu informieren. Um das Vorhaben in die Tat umzusetzen, wurde eine Projektgruppe bestehend aus Bibliothekaren und Seminarfachlehrern gebildet. In die Konzeption für diese Informationsveranstaltung wurden vor allem die Anforderungen an die Schüler im Rahmen der Seminarfacharbeit, ihre Gewohnheiten bei der Informationssuche sowie die bisherigen Erfahrungen der Zusammenarbeit von Lehrern und Bibliothekaren einbezogen. Eine wichtige Voraussetzung für die Akzeptanz der Veranstaltung bestand darin, dass das Weimarer Schulamt diese in den Stundenplan integrierte und damit die Teilnahme für die Schüler verpflichtend war.
    Am 27. März war es dann soweit: 300 Zehntklässler der Weimarer Gymnasien belebten das Audimax der Bauhaus-Universität Weimar, um die Bibliotheken der Stadt genauer unter die Lupe zu nehmen und Anregungen für potenzielle Seminarfachthemen zu erhalten. Mit den Worten des Erfinders Thomas A. Edison - dass, wenn es jemandem gelänge, die Bibliotheken und sämtliche Bücher zu vernichten, 30 Jahre später kein Schlosser mehr auch nur eine Schraube anziehen könnte - begrüßte der Direktor der Universitätsbibliothek, Frank Simon-Ritz, die Lehrer und Schüler. Für einen wichtigen Impuls sorgte im Anschluss der Prorektor für Studium und Lehre der Bauhaus-Universität Weimar, Prof. Lorenz Engell, der die Erwartungen einer Universität an die künftigen Studierenden verdeutlichte. Er beschrieb sehr anschaulich, worum es im Leben wirklich geht, und dass es dafür notwendig sei, an richtige, relevante und neue Informationen zu gelangen. In einem dritten Teil wurden die Schüler mit den Möglichkeiten der Bibliotheksrecherche bekannt gemacht. Sie erhielten mittels des fiktiven Seminarfachthemas »Graffiti« mögliche Anhaltspunkte, wie sie bei einer Recherche vorgehen können und welche Vorteile verschiede ne Quellen - von Suchmaschinen über Bibliothekskataloge bis hin zu Volltextdatenbanken - bieten. Auch ein kostenfreies Literaturverwaltungssystem wurde den Schülern nahe gebracht, damit sie auf diese Weise problemlos eine Literaturliste erstellen können.
    Kompetente Unterstützung Im weiteren Verlauf der Veranstaltung verdeutlichten die Vertreterinnen von Stadtbücherei, Herzogin Anna Amalia Bibliothek, Hochschulbibliothek der Hochschule für Musik, Bibliothek der Gedenkstätte Buchenwald, Umweltbibliothek und Universitätsbibliothek anhand der realen und virtuellen Zugänge zu den Bibliotheksbeständen zugleich die Wichtigkeit von fachkompetenter Unterstützung, damit ein Recherchethema optimal bearbeitet werden kann. Während der Veranstaltung beantworteten die Schüler einen Fragebogen, der in die Bewertung der Seminarfacharbeit einfließt. Im Anschluss an die Vorlesung, die von den Schülern und Lehrern mit viel Aufmerksamkeit und auch mit reichlich Applaus für die einzelnen Beiträge honoriert wurde, gab es in Zusammenarbeit mit dem Dezernat Studium und Lehre der Bauhaus-Unversität Weimar das fakultative Angebot, an einer Führung zu den BauhausStätten oder einer Bibliotheksbesichtigung teilzunehmen. Nach der knapp 80-minütigen Veranstaltung resümierte die 16-jährige Laura Vogt aus dem Weimarer Schillergymnasium ziemlich selbstverständlich: »Ich war heute das erste Mal in der Uni-Bibliothek und denke, dass ich mich zurecht finde.« Mit diesem Fazit geht es nun für die Weimarer Projektgruppe darum, das Potenzial der Konstellation - Schüler und Lehrer, die die Bibliotheksangebote wahrnehmen und nutzen - mit diesem Angebot zu verstetigen. Bereits am 12. Juni wird eine weitere Veranstaltung am gleichen Ort stattfinden, die sich an die Zehntklässler der Gymnasien des Weimarer Lands und die nichtstaatlichen Schulen Weimars richtet."
    Source
    BuB. 59(2007) H.6, S.406
  4. Krähwinkel, E.: Informationskompetenz als Lehrer-Fortbildung : Erfahrungen mit einem neuen Teaching-Library-Modell an der Universitätsbibliothek Marburg (2007) 0.04
    0.042892408 = product of:
      0.1838246 = sum of:
        0.018323874 = weight(_text_:und in 682) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018323874 = score(doc=682,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.38329202 = fieldWeight in 682, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=682)
        0.0030866629 = weight(_text_:in in 682) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0030866629 = score(doc=682,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.10520181 = fieldWeight in 682, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=682)
        0.018323874 = weight(_text_:und in 682) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018323874 = score(doc=682,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.38329202 = fieldWeight in 682, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=682)
        0.047372743 = weight(_text_:bibliotheken in 682) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047372743 = score(doc=682,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.08127756 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.58285147 = fieldWeight in 682, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=682)
        0.047372743 = weight(_text_:bibliotheken in 682) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047372743 = score(doc=682,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.08127756 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.58285147 = fieldWeight in 682, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=682)
        0.047372743 = weight(_text_:bibliotheken in 682) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047372743 = score(doc=682,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.08127756 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.58285147 = fieldWeight in 682, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=682)
        0.0019719584 = weight(_text_:s in 682) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0019719584 = score(doc=682,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 682, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=682)
      0.23333333 = coord(7/30)
    
    Abstract
    Auch wissenschaftliche Bibliotheken profilieren sich zunehmend als Orte der Fortbildung und des lebenslangen Lernens. Es entspricht der aktuellen Linie der Kultusministerkonferenz und des Bildungsministeriums, dass Hochschulen das Feld der Weiterbildung stärker in den Blick nehmen sollen. Bislang werden vor allem Öffentliche Bibliotheken mit Themen wie »Lebenslanges Lernen« und »Partnerschaft zu Schulen« assoziiert. Doch auch wissenschaftliche Bibliotheken entdecken auf diesen Feldern zunehmend Handlungsspielraum. Die Universitätsbibliothek Marburg zum Beispiel hat Erfahrungen mit fachübergreifenden Informationskompetenz-Fortbildungen für Lehrer von Gymnasien und Gesamtschulen gesammelt. Esther Krähwinkel skizziert den neuen Bildungsauftrag, den wissenschaftliche Bibliotheken als Teaching Library aufgreifen können, stellt das Marburger Beispiel vor und benennt Chancen, aber auch Grenzen eines solchen Angebots.
    Source
    BuB. 59(2007) H.11/12, S.803-806
  5. Renner, J.: Wer früher lehrt, ist später tot : Vom aufhaltsamen Ende der wissenschaftlichen Bibliotheken - Kommentar (2007) 0.04
    0.038074158 = product of:
      0.16317496 = sum of:
        0.01638937 = weight(_text_:und in 171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01638937 = score(doc=171,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.34282678 = fieldWeight in 171, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=171)
        0.0053462577 = weight(_text_:in in 171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0053462577 = score(doc=171,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.1822149 = fieldWeight in 171, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=171)
        0.01638937 = weight(_text_:und in 171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01638937 = score(doc=171,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.34282678 = fieldWeight in 171, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=171)
        0.041026 = weight(_text_:bibliotheken in 171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041026 = score(doc=171,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.08127756 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.5047642 = fieldWeight in 171, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=171)
        0.041026 = weight(_text_:bibliotheken in 171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041026 = score(doc=171,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.08127756 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.5047642 = fieldWeight in 171, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=171)
        0.041026 = weight(_text_:bibliotheken in 171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041026 = score(doc=171,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.08127756 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.5047642 = fieldWeight in 171, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=171)
        0.0019719584 = weight(_text_:s in 171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0019719584 = score(doc=171,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 171, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=171)
      0.23333333 = coord(7/30)
    
    Abstract
    In Zeiten fortrasender Virtualisierung sind Bibliotheken nicht mehr gottgegeben unhinterfragte Einrichtungen jeder Hochschule. Glaubt man einem sachfremden, jedoch bibliotheksaffinen Experten wie Prof. Peter Weibel, dem Vorstand des »Zentrums für Kunst und Medientechnologie« in Karlsruhe, dann werden sie nur als virtuelle Dienstleistung überleben. So lautete die These seines Vortrags anlässlich des Seminars »Die Mediengesellschaft und die Zukunft der Bibliotheken« des Berufsverbandes BIB und der ekz.bibliotheksservice GmbH in Reutlingen im Juni 2007. Doch so muss es nicht enden, wenn wir gegensteuern und uns als »Teaching Library« durch die Vermittlung von Informationskompetenz als elementaren Teil der Hochschullehre profilieren.
    Source
    BuB. 59(2007) H.11/12, S.812-813
  6. Günther, S.: Aufbruch in den virtuellen Raum : Anleitung zum Aufbau eines Web Contact Centers (2005) 0.03
    0.032505855 = product of:
      0.12189695 = sum of:
        0.010138294 = weight(_text_:und in 4207) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010138294 = score(doc=4207,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.21206908 = fieldWeight in 4207, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4207)
        0.004409519 = weight(_text_:in in 4207) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004409519 = score(doc=4207,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.15028831 = fieldWeight in 4207, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4207)
        0.010138294 = weight(_text_:und in 4207) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010138294 = score(doc=4207,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.21206908 = fieldWeight in 4207, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4207)
        0.029304285 = weight(_text_:bibliotheken in 4207) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029304285 = score(doc=4207,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.08127756 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.36054584 = fieldWeight in 4207, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4207)
        0.029304285 = weight(_text_:bibliotheken in 4207) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029304285 = score(doc=4207,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.08127756 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.36054584 = fieldWeight in 4207, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4207)
        0.029304285 = weight(_text_:bibliotheken in 4207) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029304285 = score(doc=4207,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.08127756 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.36054584 = fieldWeight in 4207, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4207)
        0.001991979 = weight(_text_:s in 4207) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.001991979 = score(doc=4207,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.08494043 = fieldWeight in 4207, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4207)
        0.0073060202 = product of:
          0.0146120405 = sum of:
            0.0146120405 = weight(_text_:22 in 4207) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0146120405 = score(doc=4207,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.07553371 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021569785 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4207, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4207)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.26666668 = coord(8/30)
    
    Abstract
    Die Weiten des Internet tendieren ins Unendliche - kaum etwas, was dort nicht vorhanden zu sein scheint. Google rühmt sich, dass jetzt die Suche auf über acht Milliarden Websites möglich ist und hat mit dem Einscannen der Bestände von US-amerikanischen und englischen Bibliotheken schon das nächste größere Projekt in Angriff genommen. Auch Microsoft schickt sich an, eine ernstzunehmende Konkurrenz in Sachen Internetrecherche zu werden. Hinzu kommt, dass das Internet eine immer größere Nutzung erfährt, 2004 lag diese bei 55,3 Prozent der Bevölkerung ab 14 Jahren - doch das alles heißt nicht, dass die Nutzer 3 im Gegenzug auch immer bessere Recherchefähigkeiten aufweisen. Es vergeht kein Tag, an dem im Informationsdienst von Bibliotheken nicht der Satz »Im Internet habe ich schon geguckt, dafind ich nix!« fällt. 100.000 Treffer zu einer Suchanfrage zu erhalten ist nicht die Kunst, aber fünf relevante Treffer zu erhalten, die noch dazu einer kritischen Bewertung standhalten (Stichwort »Information Literacy«), das bedarf eines professionellen Informationsvermittlers - eines Bibliothekars! Noch nie waren so viele Nutzer im Netz und zugleich so viele so unzufrieden. Wäre es nicht Aufgabe der Bibliotheken diese (potenziellen) Kunden aufzufangen, bevor sie in den Weiten des Internet verloren gehen? Dieses Auffangnetz existiert bereits - bekannt als Digital Reference Service, gebündelt durch die Funktionen, die das Web Contact Center bereit hält.
    Date
    22. 9.2005 20:50:31
    Source
    BuB. 57(2005) H.9, S.611-616
  7. Rösch, H.: Entwicklungsstand und Qualitätsmanagement digitaler Auskunft in Bibliotheken (2007) 0.03
    0.029784705 = product of:
      0.12764874 = sum of:
        0.019866917 = weight(_text_:und in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019866917 = score(doc=400,freq=36.0), product of:
            0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.41556883 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
              6.0 = tf(freq=36.0), with freq of:
                36.0 = termFreq=36.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
        0.0055776495 = weight(_text_:in in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0055776495 = score(doc=400,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.19010136 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
        0.019866917 = weight(_text_:und in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019866917 = score(doc=400,freq=36.0), product of:
            0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.41556883 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
              6.0 = tf(freq=36.0), with freq of:
                36.0 = termFreq=36.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
        0.027070139 = weight(_text_:bibliotheken in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027070139 = score(doc=400,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.08127756 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.33305797 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
        0.027070139 = weight(_text_:bibliotheken in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027070139 = score(doc=400,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.08127756 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.33305797 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
        0.027070139 = weight(_text_:bibliotheken in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027070139 = score(doc=400,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.08127756 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.33305797 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
        0.0011268335 = weight(_text_:s in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0011268335 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.048049565 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
      0.23333333 = coord(7/30)
    
    Abstract
    Zunächst wird die aktuelle Bedeutung digitaler Auskunft in der Informationsgesellschaft angesprochen. Anschließend folgt ein Überblick über den bislang erreichten Entwicklungsstand dieser relativ neuen Dienstleistung. Dabei werden die Vor- und Nachteile der technischen und organisatorischen Varianten erläutert. Schließlich richtet sich der Blick auf Qualitätskriterien zur Bewertung und Verbesserung digitaler Auskunft in der Praxis.
    Content
    "Die Ursprünge digitaler Auskunft reichen zurück in die 1980er Jahre. Aus bescheidenen Anfängen hat sich inzwischen eine bibliothekarische Standarddienstleistung entwickelt. Mit dem digitalen Umbruch stellten die Bibliotheken zunächst ihre Kataloge im Web für die Recherche bereit und boten FAQs zur Beantwortung von Standardfragen an. Um den vollen Umfang bibliothekarischer Dienstleistungen im Internet präsentieren zu können, bedurfte es darüber hinaus der Entwicklung eines Äquivalents für die klassische Auskunft im WWW. Die Entwicklung von digitaler Auskunft drängte sich aber nicht nur aus diesem Grund auf; das Web veränderte (und verändert) zudem die Informationskultur der Kunden; diese erwarten schnelleren und einfacheren Service. Alles soll so unmittelbar und so unkompliziert recherchierbar sein, wie man es von Google, Yahoo und anderen gewohnt ist. Außerdem hat die bibliothekarische Auskunft mit "Yahoo Clever" oder "Lycos IQ" kommerzielle Konkurrenten erhalten. Digitale Auskunft musste also als Antwort auf die Herausforderungen der kommerziellen Konkurrenz und der veränderten Benutzergewohnheiten schnell entwickelt werden. Denn nur so konnte und kann rechtzeitig unter Beweis gestellt werden, dass Bibliotheken für viele Auskunftsfälle gegenüber Suchmaschinen und Webkatalogen einen ungeheueren Vorteil besitzen: Die klassische und damit auch die digitale Auskunft zielt nicht darauf, die Fragen zu beantworten, die Benutzer stellen, sondern (idealerweise) darauf, ihnen die Informationen zu verschaffen, die sie tatsächlich benötigen.
    Schon in der ersten Hälfte des 20. Jahrhunderts war in der Praxis des Auskunftsdienstes in den USA bekannt geworden, dass Benutzer häufig nicht nach dem fragen was sie eigentlich suchen, sondern meist allgemeine und nicht selten irreführende Fragen stellen. Dafür ist die Technik des Auskunftsinterviews entwickelt worden, um gemeinsam mit dem Kunden zu ermitteln, welche Informationen exakt gesucht werden. Während Suchmaschinen nur die syntaktische und (in Ausnahmefällen) die semantische Ebene der gestellten Frage abarbeiten können, vermag bibliothekarische Auskunft einer dritten, nämlich jener pragmatischen Dimension gerecht zu werden. Anders ausgedrückt: Suchmaschinen und andere Navigationsinstrumente des Internet arbeiten objektorientiert, digitale Auskunft durch bibliothekarische Experten hingegen erbringt subjekt- bzw. kundenorientierte Dienstleistungen. Bibliotheken mit elaborierter digitaler Auskunft sind den Herausforderungen der Informationsgesellschaft damit gewachsen: ja sie sind noch unverzichtbarer als zuvor. Speziell in Deutschland allerdings ist es nicht damit getan, digitale Auskunft mit Engagement zu entwickeln. Darüber hinaus müssen große Anstrengungen unternommen werden, um die Leistungsfähigkeit dieser bibliothekarischen Dienstleistung in das Bewusstsein der realen und potentiellen Kunden zu rücken."
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 58(2007) H.4, S.197-202
  8. Buzinkay, M.: Im Reich der Auskunfts-Avatare : Bibliotheksarbeit in der virtuellen Parallelgesellschaft »Second Life« (2007) 0.03
    0.0261294 = product of:
      0.11198314 = sum of:
        0.01638937 = weight(_text_:und in 168) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01638937 = score(doc=168,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.34282678 = fieldWeight in 168, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=168)
        0.0061733257 = weight(_text_:in in 168) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0061733257 = score(doc=168,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.21040362 = fieldWeight in 168, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=168)
        0.01638937 = weight(_text_:und in 168) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01638937 = score(doc=168,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.34282678 = fieldWeight in 168, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=168)
        0.023686372 = weight(_text_:bibliotheken in 168) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023686372 = score(doc=168,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08127756 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.29142573 = fieldWeight in 168, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=168)
        0.023686372 = weight(_text_:bibliotheken in 168) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023686372 = score(doc=168,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08127756 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.29142573 = fieldWeight in 168, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=168)
        0.023686372 = weight(_text_:bibliotheken in 168) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023686372 = score(doc=168,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08127756 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.29142573 = fieldWeight in 168, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=168)
        0.0019719584 = weight(_text_:s in 168) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0019719584 = score(doc=168,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 168, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=168)
      0.23333333 = coord(7/30)
    
    Abstract
    Eine Parallelrealität in der digitalen Sphäre zu schaffen, daran wird schon seit Jahren herumexperimentiert. Das Konstrukt einer Welt, die aus Nullen und Einsen besteht, wirkt faszinierend und zieht vor allem akademisch gebildete Computerliebhaber in seinen Bann. Mit Hochdruck tüfteln Forscher, Entwickler und Softwareunternehmen an der schönen neuen Welt; nicht zuletzt, weil es hier bares Geld zu verdienen gibt. Das Spiel »Second Life« ist wohl das bekannteste Experiment. Und sogar ein paar real existierende Bibliotheken bieten dort bereits ihre Dienste an. Digitale Auskunfts-Avatare beantworten in diesem Reich auf »Info Island« Fragen der virtuellen Bibliotheksnutzer. Der Job im Drei-D-Land gehört mitunter schon zur Stellenausschreibung des realen Bibliothekars.
    Source
    BuB. 59(2007) H.2, S.107
  9. Brandorff, G.: AI@din weiß alles : Drei Jahre erfolgreicher Informationsdienst der niederländischen Bibliotheken (2005) 0.02
    0.020348556 = product of:
      0.12209134 = sum of:
        0.004988801 = weight(_text_:in in 4525) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004988801 = score(doc=4525,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.17003182 = fieldWeight in 4525, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4525)
        0.038282957 = weight(_text_:bibliotheken in 4525) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038282957 = score(doc=4525,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08127756 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.47101513 = fieldWeight in 4525, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4525)
        0.038282957 = weight(_text_:bibliotheken in 4525) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038282957 = score(doc=4525,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08127756 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.47101513 = fieldWeight in 4525, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4525)
        0.038282957 = weight(_text_:bibliotheken in 4525) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038282957 = score(doc=4525,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08127756 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.47101513 = fieldWeight in 4525, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4525)
        0.002253667 = weight(_text_:s in 4525) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.002253667 = score(doc=4525,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 4525, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4525)
      0.16666667 = coord(5/30)
    
    Abstract
    AI@din, das Informationssystem der niederländischen Bibliotheken, sorgt dafür, dass Wissbegierige auf - fast -alle Fragen eine Antwort bekommen. Landesweite Werbekampagnen, auch im Fernsehen, haben das Angebot, rasch bekanntgemacht. AI@din ist ein Erfolg - trotzdem haben die niederländischen Kollegen ein Problem: Der elektronische Informationsservice wird von den allermeisten Benutzern nicht mit der Bibliothek in Verbindung gebracht. Günter Brandorff, der seit langem in den Niederlanden lebt, beschreibt die wichtigsten Aspekte des vorbildlichen Informationssystems im Nachbarland.
    Source
    BuB. 57(2005) H.11/12, S.780-782
  10. Stock, W.G.: Themenentdeckung und -verfolgung und ihr Einsatz bei Informationsdiensten für Nachrichten (2007) 0.02
    0.016548244 = product of:
      0.09928946 = sum of:
        0.023178069 = weight(_text_:und in 151) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023178069 = score(doc=151,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.4848303 = fieldWeight in 151, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=151)
        0.004365201 = weight(_text_:in in 151) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004365201 = score(doc=151,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.14877784 = fieldWeight in 151, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=151)
        0.046596166 = weight(_text_:einzelnen in 151) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.046596166 = score(doc=151,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1139978 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.285069 = idf(docFreq=608, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.40874618 = fieldWeight in 151, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.285069 = idf(docFreq=608, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=151)
        0.023178069 = weight(_text_:und in 151) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023178069 = score(doc=151,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.4848303 = fieldWeight in 151, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=151)
        0.0019719584 = weight(_text_:s in 151) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0019719584 = score(doc=151,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 151, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=151)
      0.16666667 = coord(5/30)
    
    Abstract
    Themenentdeckung und -verfolgung (topic detection and tracking; TDT) fasst unterschiedliche Dokumente zu einem Thema zusammen und bietet dem Nutzer zunächst das Thema und erst in einem zweiten Schritt die einzelnen Dokumente zur Anzeige an. TDT ist nützlich bei Nachrichten sowie bei Blog-Einträgen. Ein bekanntes Beispiel ist Google News. Der Artikel bespricht den Forschungsstand zu TDT und diskutiert den Einsatz von TDT bei News-Informationsdiensten wie z.B. Factiva oder LexisNexis. Dort ist TDT zweifach wichtig: Erstens ist es (analog zu Google News) bei Profildiensten einsetzbar, zweitens ist es möglich, Dokumente zum gleichen Thema in einen Ordner zu klassieren, um bei einer retrospektiven Recherche die Treffermenge geordnet nach unterschiedlichen Themen anzubieten (und dies ohne Nutzung einer Dokumentationssprache).
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 58(2007) H.1, S.41-46
  11. Janes, J.: Digital reference : reference librarians' experiences and attitudes (2002) 0.02
    0.015804468 = product of:
      0.0948268 = sum of:
        0.0069998945 = weight(_text_:in in 578) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0069998945 = score(doc=578,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.23857531 = fieldWeight in 578, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=578)
        0.028712219 = weight(_text_:bibliotheken in 578) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028712219 = score(doc=578,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08127756 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.35326135 = fieldWeight in 578, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=578)
        0.028712219 = weight(_text_:bibliotheken in 578) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028712219 = score(doc=578,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08127756 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.35326135 = fieldWeight in 578, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=578)
        0.028712219 = weight(_text_:bibliotheken in 578) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028712219 = score(doc=578,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08127756 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.35326135 = fieldWeight in 578, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=578)
        0.0016902501 = weight(_text_:s in 578) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0016902501 = score(doc=578,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 578, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=578)
      0.16666667 = coord(5/30)
    
    Abstract
    This article reports the results of a survey of reference librarians in public and academic libraries of various sizes in the United States, asking them about their experiences with and attitudes towards the use of digital and networked technologies and resources in reference work. A total of 648 responded. In general, respondents were positive and optimistic in their outlook, but not unreservedly so. Among the strongest findings was a correlation between recent experience at doing digital reference and positive attitudes towards it, a clear set of opinions about what such services would be best and worst at, and differing perspectives and patterns of responses between academic and public librarians. In addition, questions asking about characteristics of librarians, their current and planned reference services, and some of their professional choices in doing reference work are reported.
    Area
    Öffentliche Bibliotheken
    Wissenschaftliche Bibliotheken
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 53(2002) no.7, S.549-566
  12. Yilmaz, B.: Social change, industrialisation and public libraries : a theoretical approach (2002) 0.01
    0.013200734 = product of:
      0.0792044 = sum of:
        0.0061733257 = weight(_text_:in in 690) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0061733257 = score(doc=690,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.21040362 = fieldWeight in 690, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=690)
        0.023686372 = weight(_text_:bibliotheken in 690) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023686372 = score(doc=690,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08127756 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.29142573 = fieldWeight in 690, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=690)
        0.023686372 = weight(_text_:bibliotheken in 690) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023686372 = score(doc=690,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08127756 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.29142573 = fieldWeight in 690, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=690)
        0.023686372 = weight(_text_:bibliotheken in 690) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023686372 = score(doc=690,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08127756 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.29142573 = fieldWeight in 690, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=690)
        0.0019719584 = weight(_text_:s in 690) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0019719584 = score(doc=690,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 690, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=690)
      0.16666667 = coord(5/30)
    
    Abstract
    In this study, industrialisation has been evaluated in the context of social change theory. Industrialisation as a period of social change is the source of public library development. The public library has emerged as a result of the changes in educational and cultural structure caused by industrialisation. Public libraries emerged as supporting elements of basic and adult diffused education effort. The change in thoughts, attitudes and values by the effect of urbanisation made public libraries a part of the new culture that is social life. The public library is a product of social change.
    Area
    Öffentliche Bibliotheken
    Source
    Aslib proceedings. 54(2002) no.5, S.326-334
  13. Parirokh, M.; Daneshgar, F.; Fattahi, R.: Identifying knowledge-sharing requirements in academic libraries (2008) 0.01
    0.01306289 = product of:
      0.078377336 = sum of:
        0.0053462577 = weight(_text_:in in 873) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0053462577 = score(doc=873,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.1822149 = fieldWeight in 873, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=873)
        0.023686372 = weight(_text_:bibliotheken in 873) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023686372 = score(doc=873,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08127756 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.29142573 = fieldWeight in 873, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=873)
        0.023686372 = weight(_text_:bibliotheken in 873) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023686372 = score(doc=873,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08127756 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.29142573 = fieldWeight in 873, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=873)
        0.023686372 = weight(_text_:bibliotheken in 873) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023686372 = score(doc=873,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08127756 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.29142573 = fieldWeight in 873, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=873)
        0.0019719584 = weight(_text_:s in 873) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0019719584 = score(doc=873,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 873, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=873)
      0.16666667 = coord(5/30)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to provide an evaluation of the existing state of practice in knowledge sharing in university libraries. Design/methodology/approach - This is survey research which is based on an electronic questionnaire. Findings - Results reveal that the majority of libraries investigated are quite friendly towards knowledge sharing, and the majority of librarians value the importance of knowledge sharing. Results also confirm that the knowledge that they mostly use is mainly intangible knowledge. Originality/value - If knowledge-sharing requirements of librarians while collaboratively performing reference and information services can be acknowledged, guidelines for enhancing conceptual collaborative process would be suggested.
    Area
    Wissenschaftliche Bibliotheken
    Source
    Library review. 57(2008) no.2, S.107-122
  14. Walter, V.A.: Public library service to children and teens : a research agenda (2003) 0.01
    0.012899379 = product of:
      0.07739627 = sum of:
        0.004365201 = weight(_text_:in in 0) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004365201 = score(doc=0,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.14877784 = fieldWeight in 0, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=0)
        0.023686372 = weight(_text_:bibliotheken in 0) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023686372 = score(doc=0,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08127756 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.29142573 = fieldWeight in 0, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=0)
        0.023686372 = weight(_text_:bibliotheken in 0) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023686372 = score(doc=0,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08127756 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.29142573 = fieldWeight in 0, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=0)
        0.023686372 = weight(_text_:bibliotheken in 0) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023686372 = score(doc=0,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08127756 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.29142573 = fieldWeight in 0, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=0)
        0.0019719584 = weight(_text_:s in 0) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0019719584 = score(doc=0,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 0, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=0)
      0.16666667 = coord(5/30)
    
    Abstract
    This paper deals with four significant unanswered questions related to children's and young adult services in public libraries: 1. How have public library services to children and young adults developed over time? 2. How and why do young people use public libraries? 3. How can we evaluate the effectiveness of public library service for young people? 4. Why should policymakers fund public library services for children and young adults? After reviewing the existing knowledge base that can serve as scaffolding for the needed research, the author suggests strategies for refining and implementing this research agenda.
    Area
    Öffentliche Bibliotheken
    Footnote
    Beitrag in einem Themenheft: Research questions for the twenty-first century
    Source
    Library trends. 51(2003) no.4, S.571-589
  15. Numminen, P.; Vakkari, P.: Question types in public libraries' digital reference service in Finland : comparing 1999 and 2006 (2009) 0.01
    0.0114190085 = product of:
      0.06851405 = sum of:
        0.005915991 = weight(_text_:in in 2850) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005915991 = score(doc=2850,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.20163295 = fieldWeight in 2850, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2850)
        0.020302603 = weight(_text_:bibliotheken in 2850) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020302603 = score(doc=2850,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08127756 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.24979347 = fieldWeight in 2850, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2850)
        0.020302603 = weight(_text_:bibliotheken in 2850) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020302603 = score(doc=2850,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08127756 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.24979347 = fieldWeight in 2850, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2850)
        0.020302603 = weight(_text_:bibliotheken in 2850) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020302603 = score(doc=2850,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08127756 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.24979347 = fieldWeight in 2850, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2850)
        0.0016902501 = weight(_text_:s in 2850) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0016902501 = score(doc=2850,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 2850, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2850)
      0.16666667 = coord(5/30)
    
    Abstract
    This study analyzes to which degree the question types addressed to a digital reference service run by a consortium of public libraries have changed between the Years 1999 and 2006. The data consist of representative samples of reference questions to a Finnish Ask a Librarian digital reference service in the years studied. Questions were classified based on a taxonomy refining earlier major taxonomies. The proportion of ready reference questions had increased from 33 to 45% whereas the proportion of subject-based research questions had decreased from 57 to 47%. Among the former, fact-finding questions had especially increased, and among the latter, topical search questions had decreased. These changes in the popularity of question types are likely related to the way people are searching on the Internet. It is concluded that the Internet has somewhat reduced the traditional role of public libraries in mediated topical searching.
    Area
    Öffentliche Bibliotheken
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.6, S.1249-1257
  16. Lewis, D.W.: Making academic reference service work (1994) 0.01
    0.011314914 = product of:
      0.06788948 = sum of:
        0.0052914224 = weight(_text_:in in 8323) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0052914224 = score(doc=8323,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 8323, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=8323)
        0.020302603 = weight(_text_:bibliotheken in 8323) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020302603 = score(doc=8323,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08127756 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.24979347 = fieldWeight in 8323, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=8323)
        0.020302603 = weight(_text_:bibliotheken in 8323) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020302603 = score(doc=8323,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08127756 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.24979347 = fieldWeight in 8323, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=8323)
        0.020302603 = weight(_text_:bibliotheken in 8323) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020302603 = score(doc=8323,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08127756 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.24979347 = fieldWeight in 8323, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=8323)
        0.0016902501 = weight(_text_:s in 8323) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0016902501 = score(doc=8323,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 8323, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=8323)
      0.16666667 = coord(5/30)
    
    Abstract
    Recent discussion of reference service in academic libraries has considered alternative approaches to service and has called on academic reference librarians to play new roles. Absent from most of the discussion is an understanding that organizational changes are required if reference librarians are to accomplish what is being asked of them. Without these organizational changes these new roles and resposibilities will be impossible. To make reference service in academic libraries effective five changes are required: (1) reference librarians must be given clear budgetary and programmatic authority; (2) the hierarchy must be flattened and reference librarians placed closer to the top of the organization; (3) support services must be provided so that reference librarians are not encumbered by nonprofessional tasks; (4) reference librarians should be brought together and not isolated in small departments; and (5) public services planning and priority setting should be done by reference librarians
    Content
    Trendartikel für den Informationsdienst in Bibliotheken
    Source
    College and research libraries. 55(1994) no.5, S.445-456
  17. Durrance, J.C.; Fisher, K.E.: Determining how libraries and librarians help (2003) 0.01
    0.011056611 = product of:
      0.066339664 = sum of:
        0.003741601 = weight(_text_:in in 33) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.003741601 = score(doc=33,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.12752387 = fieldWeight in 33, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=33)
        0.020302603 = weight(_text_:bibliotheken in 33) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020302603 = score(doc=33,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08127756 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.24979347 = fieldWeight in 33, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=33)
        0.020302603 = weight(_text_:bibliotheken in 33) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020302603 = score(doc=33,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08127756 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.24979347 = fieldWeight in 33, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=33)
        0.020302603 = weight(_text_:bibliotheken in 33) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020302603 = score(doc=33,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08127756 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.24979347 = fieldWeight in 33, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=33)
        0.0016902501 = weight(_text_:s in 33) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0016902501 = score(doc=33,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 33, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=33)
      0.16666667 = coord(5/30)
    
    Abstract
    This article examines the question, "What differences do libraries and librarians make?" primarily from the perspective of geographical communities. The article first states the reasons why this is an essential research question and describes the contributions of current public library planning tools to the determination of impact. It then takes a broad look at the framework that is essential for the intellectual development of this topic and the ability to answer the question, including methodological approaches and theoretical frameworks that will be discussed throughout. While the authors pose this research problem as an evaluation question, this article examines contributions of research in several areas--particularly professional practice, especially reference research that has been informed by qualitative methods--to its solution. Finally, the authors examine approaches to studying context as a framework for determining the impacts of library services and include a brief presentation of findings from a recent study of "How Libraries and Librarians Help: Context-Centered Methods for Evaluating Public Library Efforts at Bridging the Digital Divide and Building Community," funded by the Institute of Museums and Library Services (IMLS).
    Area
    Öffentliche Bibliotheken
    Footnote
    Beitrag in einem Themenheft: Research questions for the twenty-first century
    Source
    Library trends. 51(2003) no.4, S.541-570
  18. Baro, E.E.; Seimode, F.D.: a case study : Information literacy programmes in university libraries (2013) 0.01
    0.010117342 = product of:
      0.06070405 = sum of:
        0.008538997 = weight(_text_:in in 5067) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008538997 = score(doc=5067,freq=30.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.29103208 = fieldWeight in 5067, product of:
              5.477226 = tf(freq=30.0), with freq of:
                30.0 = termFreq=30.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5067)
        0.016918836 = weight(_text_:bibliotheken in 5067) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016918836 = score(doc=5067,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08127756 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.20816123 = fieldWeight in 5067, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5067)
        0.016918836 = weight(_text_:bibliotheken in 5067) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016918836 = score(doc=5067,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08127756 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.20816123 = fieldWeight in 5067, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5067)
        0.016918836 = weight(_text_:bibliotheken in 5067) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016918836 = score(doc=5067,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08127756 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.20816123 = fieldWeight in 5067, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5067)
        0.0014085418 = weight(_text_:s in 5067) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0014085418 = score(doc=5067,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 5067, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5067)
      0.16666667 = coord(5/30)
    
    Abstract
    This is a case study on information literacy (IL) practices in university libraries in Nigeria, the UK and the US. An online questionnaire was used for data collection. University libraries in the UK and US provide IL training in all the areas mentioned compared to university libraries in Nigeria. There are differences between university libraries in UK, US and Nigeria in IL training delivery methods. However, barriers such as lack of facilities, lack of understanding of IL, students' nonchalant attitude towards attending IL sessions, and low acceptance of the online approach were identified as factors militating against librarians' efforts when advocating and providing IL training in the university libraries in Nigeria, while barriers such as lack of time allotted for teaching IL skills, students tendency to be apathetic and bored, and a lack of understanding of what IL is were mentioned by the libraries studied in the UK and US. To have effective IL training programmes, university authorities in developing countries should see the need to provide the necessary facilities such as computers with stable Internet access in university libraries, regular power supplies, and training of librarians on IT. Most of all, librarians should collaborate with other stakeholders in their institutions to ensure an IL policy formulation and implementation in their institutions.
    Area
    Wissenschaftliche Bibliotheken
    Source
    Libri. 63(2013) no.4, S.282-294
  19. Spacey, R.; Goulding, A.: Learner support in UK public libraries (2004) 0.01
    0.010069084 = product of:
      0.060414504 = sum of:
        0.008249454 = weight(_text_:in in 663) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008249454 = score(doc=663,freq=28.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.2811637 = fieldWeight in 663, product of:
              5.2915025 = tf(freq=28.0), with freq of:
                28.0 = termFreq=28.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=663)
        0.016918836 = weight(_text_:bibliotheken in 663) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016918836 = score(doc=663,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08127756 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.20816123 = fieldWeight in 663, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=663)
        0.016918836 = weight(_text_:bibliotheken in 663) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016918836 = score(doc=663,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08127756 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.20816123 = fieldWeight in 663, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=663)
        0.016918836 = weight(_text_:bibliotheken in 663) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016918836 = score(doc=663,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08127756 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.20816123 = fieldWeight in 663, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=663)
        0.0014085418 = weight(_text_:s in 663) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0014085418 = score(doc=663,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 663, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=663)
      0.16666667 = coord(5/30)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose. To convey the initial findings of Biblio.for.mEDA, an EU project exploring lifelong learning provision for adults in public libraries set in the context of a literature review regarding support for learners in public libraries. Design/methodology/approach. A total of 20 public library authorities in England agreed to participate in a survey of the resources, support and staffing to facilitate lifelong learning in public libraries. The data were analysed manually and reported here, including current provision for learners, collaborative working, plans for the future and consideration of the impacts on staff. The findings are reported in the context of other research exploring learning in public libraries and consideration of authority's web sites, annual library plans and position statements. Findings. Depicts current lifelong learning provision in public libraries and the challenges faced by staff in supporting learners. The varying degrees of learner support provided by library services are described including assistance for adults with basic skills needs. Research limitations/implications. The findings are indicative as only 20 public library managers completed the lifelong learning survey in the UK. Practical implications. Provides an extensive review of the literature pertaining to learning in public libraries. Results of the project provide a useful snapshot of current lifelong learning activity and the ways in which services are working to support adults wishing to learn. Originality/value. This paper offers recent research results and analysis of a pressing public library issue for practitioners.
    Area
    Öffentliche Bibliotheken
    Source
    Aslib proceedings. 56(2004) no.6, S.344-355
  20. Church, J.: ¬The evolving Information Commons (2005) 0.01
    0.009737478 = product of:
      0.073031075 = sum of:
        0.023686372 = weight(_text_:bibliotheken in 2579) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023686372 = score(doc=2579,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08127756 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.29142573 = fieldWeight in 2579, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2579)
        0.023686372 = weight(_text_:bibliotheken in 2579) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023686372 = score(doc=2579,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08127756 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.29142573 = fieldWeight in 2579, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2579)
        0.023686372 = weight(_text_:bibliotheken in 2579) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023686372 = score(doc=2579,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08127756 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.29142573 = fieldWeight in 2579, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2579)
        0.0019719584 = weight(_text_:s in 2579) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0019719584 = score(doc=2579,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 2579, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2579)
      0.13333334 = coord(4/30)
    
    Area
    Wissenschaftliche Bibliotheken
    Source
    Library hi tech. 23(2005) no.1, S.75-81

Types