Search (145 results, page 1 of 8)

  • × year_i:[2020 TO 2030}
  • × language_ss:"e"
  1. Geras, A.; Siudem, G.; Gagolewski, M.: Should we introduce a dislike button for academic articles? (2020) 0.03
    0.027999477 = product of:
      0.055998955 = sum of:
        0.055998955 = sum of:
          0.018749513 = weight(_text_:h in 5620) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.018749513 = score(doc=5620,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.113842286 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045821942 = queryNorm
              0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 5620, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5620)
          0.037249442 = weight(_text_:22 in 5620) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.037249442 = score(doc=5620,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16046064 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045821942 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5620, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5620)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    There is a mutual resemblance between the behavior of users of the Stack Exchange and the dynamics of the citations accumulation process in the scientific community, which enabled us to tackle the outwardly intractable problem of assessing the impact of introducing "negative" citations. Although the most frequent reason to cite an article is to highlight the connection between the 2 publications, researchers sometimes mention an earlier work to cast a negative light. While computing citation-based scores, for instance, the h-index, information about the reason why an article was mentioned is neglected. Therefore, it can be questioned whether these indices describe scientific achievements accurately. In this article we shed insight into the problem of "negative" citations, analyzing data from Stack Exchange and, to draw more universal conclusions, we derive an approximation of citations scores. Here we show that the quantified influence of introducing negative citations is of lesser importance and that they could be used as an indicator of where the attention of the scientific community is allocated.
    Date
    6. 1.2020 18:10:22
  2. Noever, D.; Ciolino, M.: ¬The Turing deception (2022) 0.03
    0.027291521 = product of:
      0.054583043 = sum of:
        0.054583043 = product of:
          0.21833217 = sum of:
            0.21833217 = weight(_text_:3a in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.21833217 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.38847893 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045821942 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    https%3A%2F%2Farxiv.org%2Fabs%2F2212.06721&usg=AOvVaw3i_9pZm9y_dQWoHi6uv0EN
  3. Park, M.S.; Park, J.H.; Kim, H.; Lee, J.H.; Park, H.: Measuring the impacts of quantity and trustworthiness of information on COVID-19 vaccination intent (2023) 0.03
    0.02656886 = product of:
      0.05313772 = sum of:
        0.05313772 = sum of:
          0.022096515 = weight(_text_:h in 996) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.022096515 = score(doc=996,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.113842286 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045821942 = queryNorm
              0.1940976 = fieldWeight in 996, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=996)
          0.031041203 = weight(_text_:22 in 996) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.031041203 = score(doc=996,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16046064 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045821942 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 996, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=996)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2023 18:20:47
  4. Zhou, Q.; Lee, C.S.; Sin, S.-C.J.; Lin, S.; Hu, H.; Ismail, M.F.F. Bin: Understanding the use of YouTube as a learning resource : a social cognitive perspective (2020) 0.02
    0.0233329 = product of:
      0.0466658 = sum of:
        0.0466658 = sum of:
          0.015624595 = weight(_text_:h in 174) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.015624595 = score(doc=174,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.113842286 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045821942 = queryNorm
              0.13724773 = fieldWeight in 174, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=174)
          0.031041203 = weight(_text_:22 in 174) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.031041203 = score(doc=174,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16046064 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045821942 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 174, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=174)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  5. Hottenrott, H.; Rose, M.E.; Lawson, C.: ¬The rise of multiple institutional affiliations in academia (2021) 0.02
    0.0233329 = product of:
      0.0466658 = sum of:
        0.0466658 = sum of:
          0.015624595 = weight(_text_:h in 313) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.015624595 = score(doc=313,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.113842286 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045821942 = queryNorm
              0.13724773 = fieldWeight in 313, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=313)
          0.031041203 = weight(_text_:22 in 313) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.031041203 = score(doc=313,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16046064 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045821942 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 313, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=313)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This study provides the first systematic, international, large-scale evidence on the extent and nature of multiple institutional affiliations on journal publications. Studying more than 15 million authors and 22 million articles from 40 countries we document that: In 2019, almost one in three articles was (co-)authored by authors with multiple affiliations and the share of authors with multiple affiliations increased from around 10% to 16% since 1996. The growth of multiple affiliations is prevalent in all fields and it is stronger in high impact journals. About 60% of multiple affiliations are between institutions from within the academic sector. International co-affiliations, which account for about a quarter of multiple affiliations, most often involve institutions from the United States, China, Germany and the United Kingdom, suggesting a core-periphery network. Network analysis also reveals a number communities of countries that are more likely to share affiliations. We discuss potential causes and show that the timing of the rise in multiple affiliations can be linked to the introduction of more competitive funding structures such as "excellence initiatives" in a number of countries. We discuss implications for science and science policy.
  6. Oh, H.; Nam, S.; Zhu, Y.: Structured abstract summarization of scientific articles : summarization using full-text section information (2023) 0.02
    0.0233329 = product of:
      0.0466658 = sum of:
        0.0466658 = sum of:
          0.015624595 = weight(_text_:h in 889) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.015624595 = score(doc=889,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.113842286 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045821942 = queryNorm
              0.13724773 = fieldWeight in 889, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=889)
          0.031041203 = weight(_text_:22 in 889) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.031041203 = score(doc=889,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16046064 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045821942 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 889, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=889)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2023 18:57:12
  7. Yu, C.; Xue, H.; An, L.; Li, G.: ¬A lightweight semantic-enhanced interactive network for efficient short-text matching (2023) 0.02
    0.0233329 = product of:
      0.0466658 = sum of:
        0.0466658 = sum of:
          0.015624595 = weight(_text_:h in 890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.015624595 = score(doc=890,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.113842286 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045821942 = queryNorm
              0.13724773 = fieldWeight in 890, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=890)
          0.031041203 = weight(_text_:22 in 890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.031041203 = score(doc=890,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16046064 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045821942 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 890, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=890)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2023 19:05:27
  8. Cerda-Cosme, R.; Méndez, E.: Analysis of shared research data in Spanish scientific papers about COVID-19 : a first approach (2023) 0.02
    0.0233329 = product of:
      0.0466658 = sum of:
        0.0466658 = sum of:
          0.015624595 = weight(_text_:h in 916) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.015624595 = score(doc=916,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.113842286 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045821942 = queryNorm
              0.13724773 = fieldWeight in 916, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=916)
          0.031041203 = weight(_text_:22 in 916) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.031041203 = score(doc=916,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16046064 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045821942 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 916, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=916)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    During the coronavirus pandemic, changes in the way science is done and shared occurred, which motivates meta-research to help understand science communication in crises and improve its effectiveness. The objective is to study how many Spanish scientific papers on COVID-19 published during 2020 share their research data. Qualitative and descriptive study applying nine attributes: (a) availability, (b) accessibility, (c) format, (d) licensing, (e) linkage, (f) funding, (g) editorial policy, (h) content, and (i) statistics. We analyzed 1,340 papers, 1,173 (87.5%) did not have research data. A total of 12.5% share their research data of which 2.1% share their data in repositories, 5% share their data through a simple request, 0.2% do not have permission to share their data, and 5.2% share their data as supplementary material. There is a small percentage that shares their research data; however, it demonstrates the researchers' poor knowledge on how to properly share their research data and their lack of knowledge on what is research data.
    Date
    21. 3.2023 19:22:02
  9. Qin, H.; Wang, H.; Johnson, A.: Understanding the information needs and information-seeking behaviours of new-generation engineering designers for effective knowledge management (2020) 0.02
    0.021255087 = product of:
      0.042510174 = sum of:
        0.042510174 = sum of:
          0.01767721 = weight(_text_:h in 181) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.01767721 = score(doc=181,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.113842286 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045821942 = queryNorm
              0.15527807 = fieldWeight in 181, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=181)
          0.024832962 = weight(_text_:22 in 181) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.024832962 = score(doc=181,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16046064 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045821942 = queryNorm
              0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 181, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=181)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  10. Fugmann, R.: What is information? : an information veteran looks back (2022) 0.02
    0.0155206015 = product of:
      0.031041203 = sum of:
        0.031041203 = product of:
          0.062082406 = sum of:
            0.062082406 = weight(_text_:22 in 1085) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.062082406 = score(doc=1085,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16046064 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045821942 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1085, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1085)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    18. 8.2022 19:22:57
  11. Satija, M.P.: Kim H. Veltman (1948-2020) : In Memoriam (2020) 0.01
    0.013257908 = product of:
      0.026515815 = sum of:
        0.026515815 = product of:
          0.05303163 = sum of:
            0.05303163 = weight(_text_:h in 17) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05303163 = score(doc=17,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.113842286 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045821942 = queryNorm
                0.4658342 = fieldWeight in 17, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=17)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Biographed
    Veltman, Kim H.
  12. Morris, V.: Automated language identification of bibliographic resources (2020) 0.01
    0.012416481 = product of:
      0.024832962 = sum of:
        0.024832962 = product of:
          0.049665924 = sum of:
            0.049665924 = weight(_text_:22 in 5749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049665924 = score(doc=5749,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16046064 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045821942 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5749, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5749)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    2. 3.2020 19:04:22
  13. Tay, A.: ¬The next generation discovery citation indexes : a review of the landscape in 2020 (2020) 0.01
    0.010864421 = product of:
      0.021728842 = sum of:
        0.021728842 = product of:
          0.043457683 = sum of:
            0.043457683 = weight(_text_:22 in 40) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043457683 = score(doc=40,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16046064 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045821942 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 40, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=40)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    17.11.2020 12:22:59
  14. Manley, S.: Letters to the editor and the race for publication metrics (2022) 0.01
    0.010864421 = product of:
      0.021728842 = sum of:
        0.021728842 = product of:
          0.043457683 = sum of:
            0.043457683 = weight(_text_:22 in 547) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043457683 = score(doc=547,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16046064 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045821942 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 547, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=547)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    6. 4.2022 19:22:26
  15. Wu, P.F.: Veni, vidi, vici? : On the rise of scrape-and-report scholarship in online reviews research (2023) 0.01
    0.010864421 = product of:
      0.021728842 = sum of:
        0.021728842 = product of:
          0.043457683 = sum of:
            0.043457683 = weight(_text_:22 in 896) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043457683 = score(doc=896,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16046064 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045821942 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 896, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=896)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2023 18:33:53
  16. Candela, G.: ¬An automatic data quality approach to assess semantic data from cultural heritage institutions (2023) 0.01
    0.010864421 = product of:
      0.021728842 = sum of:
        0.021728842 = product of:
          0.043457683 = sum of:
            0.043457683 = weight(_text_:22 in 997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043457683 = score(doc=997,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16046064 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045821942 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 997, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=997)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2023 18:23:31
  17. Lee, Y.-Y.; Ke, H.; Yen, T.-Y.; Huang, H.-H.; Chen, H.-H.: Combining and learning word embedding with WordNet for semantic relatedness and similarity measurement (2020) 0.01
    0.010481297 = product of:
      0.020962594 = sum of:
        0.020962594 = product of:
          0.04192519 = sum of:
            0.04192519 = weight(_text_:h in 5871) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04192519 = score(doc=5871,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.113842286 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045821942 = queryNorm
                0.3682743 = fieldWeight in 5871, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5871)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  18. Bullard, J.; Dierking, A.; Grundner, A.: Centring LGBT2QIA+ subjects in knowledge organization systems (2020) 0.01
    0.009312361 = product of:
      0.018624721 = sum of:
        0.018624721 = product of:
          0.037249442 = sum of:
            0.037249442 = weight(_text_:22 in 5996) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037249442 = score(doc=5996,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16046064 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045821942 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5996, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5996)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    6.10.2020 21:22:33
  19. Lorentzen, D.G.: Bridging polarised Twitter discussions : the interactions of the users in the middle (2021) 0.01
    0.009312361 = product of:
      0.018624721 = sum of:
        0.018624721 = product of:
          0.037249442 = sum of:
            0.037249442 = weight(_text_:22 in 182) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037249442 = score(doc=182,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16046064 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045821942 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 182, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=182)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  20. Park, Y.J.: ¬A socio-technological model of search information divide in US cities (2021) 0.01
    0.009312361 = product of:
      0.018624721 = sum of:
        0.018624721 = product of:
          0.037249442 = sum of:
            0.037249442 = weight(_text_:22 in 184) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037249442 = score(doc=184,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16046064 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045821942 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 184, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=184)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22

Types

  • a 141
  • el 4
  • m 3
  • p 2
  • More… Less…