Search (303 results, page 1 of 16)

  • × year_i:[2020 TO 2030}
  1. Petras, V.; Womser-Hacker, C.: Evaluation im Information Retrieval (2023) 0.07 
    0.06557818 = sum of:
  0.03578743 = product of:
    0.17893714 = sum of:
      0.17893714 = weight(_text_:hacker in 808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.17893714 = score(doc=808,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.2885145 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.615483 = idf(docFreq=160, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04361201 = queryNorm
          0.6202015 = fieldWeight in 808, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            6.615483 = idf(docFreq=160, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=808)
    0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.029790748 = product of:
    0.059581496 = sum of:
      0.059581496 = weight(_text_:c in 808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.059581496 = score(doc=808,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.15043549 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04361201 = queryNorm
          0.3960601 = fieldWeight in 808, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=808)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Das Ziel einer Evaluation ist die Überprüfung, ob bzw. in welchem Ausmaß ein Informationssystem die an das System gestellten Anforderungen erfüllt. Informationssysteme können aus verschiedenen Perspektiven evaluiert werden. Für eine ganzheitliche Evaluation (als Synonym wird auch Evaluierung benutzt), die unterschiedliche Qualitätsaspekte betrachtet (z. B. wie gut ein System relevante Dokumente rankt, wie schnell ein System die Suche durchführt, wie die Ergebnispräsentation gestaltet ist oder wie Suchende durch das System geführt werden) und die Erfüllung mehrerer Anforderungen überprüft, empfiehlt es sich, sowohl eine perspektivische als auch methodische Triangulation (d. h. der Einsatz von mehreren Ansätzen zur Qualitätsüberprüfung) vorzunehmen. Im Information Retrieval (IR) konzentriert sich die Evaluation auf die Qualitätseinschätzung der Suchfunktion eines Information-Retrieval-Systems (IRS), wobei oft zwischen systemzentrierter und nutzerzentrierter Evaluation unterschieden wird. Dieses Kapitel setzt den Fokus auf die systemzentrierte Evaluation, während andere Kapitel dieses Handbuchs andere Evaluationsansätze diskutieren (s. Kapitel C 4 Interaktives Information Retrieval, C 7 Cross-Language Information Retrieval und D 1 Information Behavior).
    Source
    Grundlagen der Informationswissenschaft. Hrsg.: Rainer Kuhlen, Dirk Lewandowski, Wolfgang Semar und Christa Womser-Hacker. 7., völlig neu gefasste Ausg
  2. Lewandowski, D.; Womser-Hacker, C.: Information seeking behaviour (2023) 0.06 
    0.06181831 = sum of:
  0.041751996 = product of:
    0.20875998 = sum of:
      0.20875998 = weight(_text_:hacker in 816) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.20875998 = score(doc=816,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.2885145 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.615483 = idf(docFreq=160, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04361201 = queryNorm
          0.72356844 = fieldWeight in 816, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            6.615483 = idf(docFreq=160, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=816)
    0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.020066312 = product of:
    0.040132623 = sum of:
      0.040132623 = weight(_text_:c in 816) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.040132623 = score(doc=816,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15043549 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04361201 = queryNorm
          0.2667763 = fieldWeight in 816, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=816)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Grundlagen der Informationswissenschaft. Hrsg.: Rainer Kuhlen, Dirk Lewandowski, Wolfgang Semar und Christa Womser-Hacker. 7., völlig neu gefasste Ausg
  3. Grundlagen der Informationswissenschaft (2023) 0.06 
    0.05929964 = sum of:
  0.028292445 = product of:
    0.14146222 = sum of:
      0.14146222 = weight(_text_:hacker in 1043) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.14146222 = score(doc=1043,freq=10.0), product of:
          0.2885145 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.615483 = idf(docFreq=160, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04361201 = queryNorm
          0.49031237 = fieldWeight in 1043, product of:
            3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
              10.0 = termFreq=10.0
            6.615483 = idf(docFreq=160, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1043)
    0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.031007197 = product of:
    0.062014394 = sum of:
      0.062014394 = weight(_text_:c in 1043) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.062014394 = score(doc=1043,freq=26.0), product of:
          0.15043549 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04361201 = queryNorm
          0.41223246 = fieldWeight in 1043, product of:
            5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
              26.0 = termFreq=26.0
            3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1043)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Hans-Christian Jetter: B 13 Informationsvisualisierung und Visual Analytics - 295 / Melanie Siegel: B 14 Maschinelle Übersetzung - 307 / Ulrich Herb: B 15 Verfahren der wissenschaftlichen Qualitäts-/ Relevanzsicherung / Evaluierung - 317 / Thomas Mandl: B 16 Text Mining und Data Mining - 327 / Heike Neuroth: B 17 Forschungsdaten - 339 / Isabella Peters: B 18 Folksonomies & Social Tagging - 351 / Christa Womser-Hacker: C 1 Informationswissenschaftliche Perspektiven des Information Retrieval - 365 / Norbert Fuhr: C 2 Modelle im Information Retrieval - 379 / Dirk Lewandowski: C 3 Suchmaschinen - 391 / David Elsweiler & Udo Kruschwitz: C 4 Interaktives Information Retrieval - 403 / Thomas Mandl & Sebastian Diem: C 5 Bild- und Video-Retrieval - 413 / Maximilian Eibl, Josef Haupt, Stefan Kahl, Stefan Taubert & Thomas Wilhelm-Stein: C 6 Audio- und Musik-Retrieval - 423 / Christa Womser-Hacker: C 7 Cross-Language Information Retrieval (CLIR) - 433 / Vivien Petras & Christa Womser-Hacker: C 8 Evaluation im Information Retrieval - 443 / Philipp Schaer: C 9 Sprachmodelle und neuronale Netze im Information Retrieval - 455 / Stefanie Elbeshausen: C 10 Modellierung von Benutzer*innen, Kontextualisierung, Personalisierung - 467 / Ragna Seidler-de Alwis: C 11 Informationsrecherche - 477 / Ulrich Reimer: C 12 Empfehlungssysteme - 485 / Elke Greifeneder & Kirsten Schlebbe: D 1 Information Behaviour - 499 / Nicola Döring: D 2 Computervermittelte Kommunikation - 511 / Hans-Christian Jetter: D 3 Mensch-Computer-Interaktion, Usability und User Experience - 525 / Gabriele Irle: D 4 Emotionen im Information Seeking - 535 /
    Kirsten Schlebbe & Elke Greifeneder: D 5 Information Need, Informationsbedarf und -bedürfnis - 543 / Dirk Lewandowski & Christa Womser-Hacker: D 6 Information Seeking Behaviour - 553 / Wolfgang Semar: D 7 Informations- und Wissensmanagement - 567 / Joachim Griesbaum: D 8 Informationskompetenz - 581 / Antje Michel, Maria Gäde, Anke Wittich & Inka Tappenbeck: D 9 Informationsdidaktik - 595 / Rainer Kuhlen: E 1 Informationsmarkt - 605 / Wolfgang Semar: E 2 Plattformökonomie - 621 / Tassilo Pellegrini & Jan Krone: E 3 Medienökonomie - 633 / Christoph Bläsi: E 4 Verlage in Wissenschaft und Bildung - 643 / Irina Sens, Alexander Pöche, Dana Vosberg, Judith Ludwig & Nicola Bieg: E 5 Lizenzierungsformen - 655 / Joachim Griesbaum: E 6 Online-Marketing - 667 / Frauke Schade & Ursula Georgy: E 7 Marketing für Informationseinrichtungen - 679 / Isabella Peters: E 8 Social Media & Social Web - 691 / Klaus Tochtermann & Anna Maria Höfler: E 9 Open Science - 703 / Ulrich Herb & Heinz Pampel: E 10 Open Access - 715 / Tobias Siebenlist: E 11 Open Data - 727 / Sigrid Fahrer & Tamara Heck: E 12 Open Educational Resources - 735 / Tobias Siebenlist: E 13 Open Government - 745 / Herrmann Rösch: F 1 Informationsethik - 755 / Bernard Bekavac: F 2 Informations-, Kommunikationstechnologien- und Webtechnologien - 773 / Peter Brettschneider: F 3 Urheberrecht - 789 / Johannes Caspar: F 4 Datenschutz und Informationsfreiheit - 803 / Norman Meuschke, Nicole Walger & Bela Gipp: F 5 Plagiat - 817 / Rainer Kuhlen: F 6 Informationspathologien - Desinformation - 829 / Glossar
    Editor
    Womser-Hacker, C.
  4. Koch, C.: Was ist Bewusstsein? (2020) 0.06 
    0.058210287 = product of:
  0.116420574 = sum of:
    0.116420574 = sum of:
      0.05733232 = weight(_text_:c in 5723) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05733232 = score(doc=5723,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15043549 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04361201 = queryNorm
          0.381109 = fieldWeight in 5723, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5723)
      0.059088256 = weight(_text_:22 in 5723) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.059088256 = score(doc=5723,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15272184 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04361201 = queryNorm
          0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5723, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5723)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    17. 1.2020 22:15:11
  5. Womser-Hacker, C.: Cross-Language Information Retrieval (CLIR) (2023) 0.05 
    0.05298713 = sum of:
  0.03578743 = product of:
    0.17893714 = sum of:
      0.17893714 = weight(_text_:hacker in 806) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.17893714 = score(doc=806,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.2885145 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.615483 = idf(docFreq=160, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04361201 = queryNorm
          0.6202015 = fieldWeight in 806, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            6.615483 = idf(docFreq=160, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=806)
    0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.017199697 = product of:
    0.034399394 = sum of:
      0.034399394 = weight(_text_:c in 806) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.034399394 = score(doc=806,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15043549 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04361201 = queryNorm
          0.22866541 = fieldWeight in 806, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=806)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Grundlagen der Informationswissenschaft. Hrsg.: Rainer Kuhlen, Dirk Lewandowski, Wolfgang Semar und Christa Womser-Hacker. 7., völlig neu gefasste Ausg
  6. Hubert, M.; Griesbaum, J.; Womser-Hacker, C.: Usability von Browsererweiterungen zum Schutz vor Tracking (2020) 0.05 
    0.049589433 = sum of:
  0.02952312 = product of:
    0.1476156 = sum of:
      0.1476156 = weight(_text_:hacker in 5866) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.1476156 = score(doc=5866,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.2885145 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.615483 = idf(docFreq=160, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04361201 = queryNorm
          0.51164013 = fieldWeight in 5866, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            6.615483 = idf(docFreq=160, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5866)
    0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.020066312 = product of:
    0.040132623 = sum of:
      0.040132623 = weight(_text_:c in 5866) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.040132623 = score(doc=5866,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15043549 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04361201 = queryNorm
          0.2667763 = fieldWeight in 5866, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5866)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
  7. Hobohm, H.-C.: Theorien in der Informationswissenschaft (2023) 0.05 
    0.049589433 = sum of:
  0.02952312 = product of:
    0.1476156 = sum of:
      0.1476156 = weight(_text_:hacker in 776) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.1476156 = score(doc=776,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.2885145 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.615483 = idf(docFreq=160, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04361201 = queryNorm
          0.51164013 = fieldWeight in 776, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            6.615483 = idf(docFreq=160, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=776)
    0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.020066312 = product of:
    0.040132623 = sum of:
      0.040132623 = weight(_text_:c in 776) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.040132623 = score(doc=776,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15043549 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04361201 = queryNorm
          0.2667763 = fieldWeight in 776, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=776)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Grundlagen der Informationswissenschaft. Hrsg.: Rainer Kuhlen, Dirk Lewandowski, Wolfgang Semar und Christa Womser-Hacker. 7., völlig neu gefasste Ausg
  8. Womser-Hacker, C.: Informationswissenschaftliche Perspektiven des Information Retrieval (2023) 0.04 
    0.044155937 = sum of:
  0.029822856 = product of:
    0.14911428 = sum of:
      0.14911428 = weight(_text_:hacker in 798) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.14911428 = score(doc=798,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.2885145 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.615483 = idf(docFreq=160, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04361201 = queryNorm
          0.5168346 = fieldWeight in 798, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            6.615483 = idf(docFreq=160, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=798)
    0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.01433308 = product of:
    0.02866616 = sum of:
      0.02866616 = weight(_text_:c in 798) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.02866616 = score(doc=798,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15043549 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04361201 = queryNorm
          0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 798, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=798)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Grundlagen der Informationswissenschaft. Hrsg.: Rainer Kuhlen, Dirk Lewandowski, Wolfgang Semar und Christa Womser-Hacker. 7., völlig neu gefasste Ausg
  9. Mandl, T.; Diem, S.: Bild- und Video-Retrieval (2023) 0.04 
    0.042505227 = sum of:
  0.02530553 = product of:
    0.12652765 = sum of:
      0.12652765 = weight(_text_:hacker in 801) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.12652765 = score(doc=801,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.2885145 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.615483 = idf(docFreq=160, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04361201 = queryNorm
          0.43854868 = fieldWeight in 801, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            6.615483 = idf(docFreq=160, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=801)
    0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.017199697 = product of:
    0.034399394 = sum of:
      0.034399394 = weight(_text_:c in 801) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.034399394 = score(doc=801,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15043549 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04361201 = queryNorm
          0.22866541 = fieldWeight in 801, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=801)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Digitale Bildverarbeitung hat längst den Alltag erreicht: Automatisierte Passkontrollen, Gesichtserkennung auf dem Mobiltelefon und Apps zum Bestimmen von Pflanzen anhand von Fotos sind nur einige Beispiele für den Einsatz dieser Technologie. Digitale Bildverarbeitung zur Analyse der Inhalte von Bildern kann den Zugang zu Wissen verbessern und ist somit relevant für die Informationswissenschaft. Häufig greifen Systeme bei der Suche nach visueller Information nach wie vor auf beschreibende Metadaten zu, weil diese sprachbasierten Methoden für Massendaten meist robust funktionieren. Der Fokus liegt in diesem Beitrag auf automatischer Inhaltsanalyse von Bildern (content based image retrieval) und nicht auf reinen Metadaten-Systemen, welche Wörter für die Beschreibung von Bildern nutzen (s. Kapitel B 9 Metadaten) und somit letztlich Text-Retrieval ausführen (concept based image retrieval) (s. Kapitel C 1 Informationswissenschaftliche Perspektiven des Information Retrieval).
    Source
    Grundlagen der Informationswissenschaft. Hrsg.: Rainer Kuhlen, Dirk Lewandowski, Wolfgang Semar und Christa Womser-Hacker. 7., völlig neu gefasste Ausg
  10. Jetter, H.-C.: Mensch-Computer-Interaktion, usability und user experience (2023) 0.04 
    0.042505227 = sum of:
  0.02530553 = product of:
    0.12652765 = sum of:
      0.12652765 = weight(_text_:hacker in 813) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.12652765 = score(doc=813,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.2885145 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.615483 = idf(docFreq=160, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04361201 = queryNorm
          0.43854868 = fieldWeight in 813, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            6.615483 = idf(docFreq=160, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=813)
    0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.017199697 = product of:
    0.034399394 = sum of:
      0.034399394 = weight(_text_:c in 813) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.034399394 = score(doc=813,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15043549 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04361201 = queryNorm
          0.22866541 = fieldWeight in 813, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=813)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Grundlagen der Informationswissenschaft. Hrsg.: Rainer Kuhlen, Dirk Lewandowski, Wolfgang Semar und Christa Womser-Hacker. 7., völlig neu gefasste Ausg
  11. Jetter, H.-C.: Informationsvisualisierung und Visual Analytics (2023) 0.04 
    0.03542102 = sum of:
  0.021087943 = product of:
    0.10543971 = sum of:
      0.10543971 = weight(_text_:hacker in 791) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.10543971 = score(doc=791,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.2885145 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.615483 = idf(docFreq=160, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04361201 = queryNorm
          0.36545724 = fieldWeight in 791, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            6.615483 = idf(docFreq=160, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=791)
    0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.01433308 = product of:
    0.02866616 = sum of:
      0.02866616 = weight(_text_:c in 791) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.02866616 = score(doc=791,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15043549 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04361201 = queryNorm
          0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 791, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=791)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Grundlagen der Informationswissenschaft. Hrsg.: Rainer Kuhlen, Dirk Lewandowski, Wolfgang Semar und Christa Womser-Hacker. 7., völlig neu gefasste Ausg
  12. Zheng, X.; Chen, J.; Yan, E.; Ni, C.: Gender and country biases in Wikipedia citations to scholarly publications (2023) 0.03 
    0.034926176 = product of:
  0.06985235 = sum of:
    0.06985235 = sum of:
      0.034399394 = weight(_text_:c in 886) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.034399394 = score(doc=886,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15043549 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04361201 = queryNorm
          0.22866541 = fieldWeight in 886, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=886)
      0.035452954 = weight(_text_:22 in 886) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.035452954 = score(doc=886,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15272184 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04361201 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 886, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=886)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 1.2023 18:53:32
  13. Ma, L.: Information, platformized (2023) 0.03 
    0.034926176 = product of:
  0.06985235 = sum of:
    0.06985235 = sum of:
      0.034399394 = weight(_text_:c in 888) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.034399394 = score(doc=888,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15043549 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04361201 = queryNorm
          0.22866541 = fieldWeight in 888, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=888)
      0.035452954 = weight(_text_:22 in 888) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.035452954 = score(doc=888,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15272184 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04361201 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 888, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=888)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Scholarly publications are often regarded as "information" by default. They are collected, organized, preserved, and made accessible as knowledge records. However, the instances of article retraction, misconduct and malpractices of researchers and the replication crisis have raised concerns about the informativeness and evidential qualities of information. Among many factors, knowledge production has moved away from "normal science" under the systemic influences of platformization involving the datafication and commodification of scholarly articles, research profiles and research activities. This article aims to understand the platformization of information by examining how research practices and knowledge production are steered by market and platform mechanisms in four ways: (a) ownership of information; (b) metrics for sale; (c) relevance by metrics, and (d) market-based competition. In conclusion, the article argues that information is platformized when platforms hold the dominating power in determining what kinds of information can be disseminated and rewarded and when informativeness is decoupled from the normative agreement or consensus co-constructed and co-determined in an open and public discourse.
    Date
    22. 1.2023 19:01:47
  14. Hottenrott, H.; Rose, M.E.; Lawson, C.: ¬The rise of multiple institutional affiliations in academia (2021) 0.03 
    0.029105144 = product of:
  0.058210287 = sum of:
    0.058210287 = sum of:
      0.02866616 = weight(_text_:c in 313) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.02866616 = score(doc=313,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15043549 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04361201 = queryNorm
          0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 313, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=313)
      0.029544128 = weight(_text_:22 in 313) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.029544128 = score(doc=313,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15272184 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04361201 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 313, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=313)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    This study provides the first systematic, international, large-scale evidence on the extent and nature of multiple institutional affiliations on journal publications. Studying more than 15 million authors and 22 million articles from 40 countries we document that: In 2019, almost one in three articles was (co-)authored by authors with multiple affiliations and the share of authors with multiple affiliations increased from around 10% to 16% since 1996. The growth of multiple affiliations is prevalent in all fields and it is stronger in high impact journals. About 60% of multiple affiliations are between institutions from within the academic sector. International co-affiliations, which account for about a quarter of multiple affiliations, most often involve institutions from the United States, China, Germany and the United Kingdom, suggesting a core-periphery network. Network analysis also reveals a number communities of countries that are more likely to share affiliations. We discuss potential causes and show that the timing of the rise in multiple affiliations can be linked to the introduction of more competitive funding structures such as "excellence initiatives" in a number of countries. We discuss implications for science and science policy.
  15. Cox, A.; Fulton, C.: Geographies of information behaviour : a conceptual exploration (2022) 0.03 
    0.029105144 = product of:
  0.058210287 = sum of:
    0.058210287 = sum of:
      0.02866616 = weight(_text_:c in 678) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.02866616 = score(doc=678,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15043549 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04361201 = queryNorm
          0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 678, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=678)
      0.029544128 = weight(_text_:22 in 678) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.029544128 = score(doc=678,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15272184 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04361201 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 678, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=678)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    5. 6.2022 17:20:22
  16. Lee, D.J.; Stvilia, B.; Ha, S.; Hahn, D.: ¬The structure and priorities of researchers' scholarly profile maintenance activities : a case of institutional research information management system (2023) 0.03 
    0.029105144 = product of:
  0.058210287 = sum of:
    0.058210287 = sum of:
      0.02866616 = weight(_text_:c in 884) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.02866616 = score(doc=884,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15043549 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04361201 = queryNorm
          0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 884, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=884)
      0.029544128 = weight(_text_:22 in 884) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.029544128 = score(doc=884,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15272184 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04361201 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 884, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=884)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Research information management systems (RIMS) have become critical components of information technology infrastructure on university campuses. They are used not just for sharing and promoting faculty research, but also for conducting faculty evaluation and development, facilitating research collaborations, identifying mentors for student projects, and expert consultants for local businesses. This study is one of the first empirical investigations of the structure of researchers' scholarly profile maintenance activities in a nonmandatory institutional RIMS. By analyzing the RIMS's log data, we identified 11 tasks researchers performed when updating their profiles. These tasks were further grouped into three activities: (a) adding publication, (b) enhancing researcher identity, and (c) improving research discoverability. In addition, we found that junior researchers and female researchers were more engaged in maintaining their RIMS profiles than senior researchers and male researchers. The results provide insights for designing profile maintenance action templates for institutional RIMS that are tailored to researchers' characteristics and help enhance researchers' engagement in the curation of their research information. This also suggests that female and junior researchers can serve as early adopters of institutional RIMS.
    Date
    22. 1.2023 18:43:02
  17. Yu, C.; Xue, H.; An, L.; Li, G.: ¬A lightweight semantic-enhanced interactive network for efficient short-text matching (2023) 0.03 
    0.029105144 = product of:
  0.058210287 = sum of:
    0.058210287 = sum of:
      0.02866616 = weight(_text_:c in 890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.02866616 = score(doc=890,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15043549 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04361201 = queryNorm
          0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 890, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=890)
      0.029544128 = weight(_text_:22 in 890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.029544128 = score(doc=890,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15272184 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04361201 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 890, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=890)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 1.2023 19:05:27
  18. Cerda-Cosme, R.; Méndez, E.: Analysis of shared research data in Spanish scientific papers about COVID-19 : a first approach (2023) 0.03 
    0.029105144 = product of:
  0.058210287 = sum of:
    0.058210287 = sum of:
      0.02866616 = weight(_text_:c in 916) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.02866616 = score(doc=916,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15043549 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04361201 = queryNorm
          0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 916, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=916)
      0.029544128 = weight(_text_:22 in 916) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.029544128 = score(doc=916,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15272184 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04361201 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 916, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=916)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    During the coronavirus pandemic, changes in the way science is done and shared occurred, which motivates meta-research to help understand science communication in crises and improve its effectiveness. The objective is to study how many Spanish scientific papers on COVID-19 published during 2020 share their research data. Qualitative and descriptive study applying nine attributes: (a) availability, (b) accessibility, (c) format, (d) licensing, (e) linkage, (f) funding, (g) editorial policy, (h) content, and (i) statistics. We analyzed 1,340 papers, 1,173 (87.5%) did not have research data. A total of 12.5% share their research data of which 2.1% share their data in repositories, 5% share their data through a simple request, 0.2% do not have permission to share their data, and 5.2% share their data as supplementary material. There is a small percentage that shares their research data; however, it demonstrates the researchers' poor knowledge on how to properly share their research data and their lack of knowledge on what is research data.
    Date
    21. 3.2023 19:22:02
  19. Hocker, J.; Schindler, C.; Rittberger, M.: Participatory design for ontologies : a case study of an open science ontology for qualitative coding schemas (2020) 0.02 
    0.023284115 = product of:
  0.04656823 = sum of:
    0.04656823 = sum of:
      0.022932928 = weight(_text_:c in 179) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.022932928 = score(doc=179,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15043549 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04361201 = queryNorm
          0.1524436 = fieldWeight in 179, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=179)
      0.023635302 = weight(_text_:22 in 179) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.023635302 = score(doc=179,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15272184 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04361201 = queryNorm
          0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 179, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=179)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  20. Reimer, U.: Einführung in die Wissensorganisation (2023) 0.02 
    0.021087943 = product of:
  0.042175885 = sum of:
    0.042175885 = product of:
      0.21087942 = sum of:
        0.21087942 = weight(_text_:hacker in 779) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.21087942 = score(doc=779,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2885145 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.615483 = idf(docFreq=160, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04361201 = queryNorm
            0.7309145 = fieldWeight in 779, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.615483 = idf(docFreq=160, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=779)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Grundlagen der Informationswissenschaft. Hrsg.: Rainer Kuhlen, Dirk Lewandowski, Wolfgang Semar und Christa Womser-Hacker. 7., völlig neu gefasste Ausg

Authors

Languages

  • e 189
  • d 114
  • m 1
  • pt 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 284
  • el 45
  • m 11
  • p 3
  • s 2
  • x 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications