Search (9420 results, page 470 of 471)

  1. Lagoze, C.: Keeping Dublin Core simple : Cross-domain discovery or resource description? (2001) 0.00 
    0.0024589198 = product of:
  0.0049178395 = sum of:
    0.0049178395 = product of:
      0.014753518 = sum of:
        0.014753518 = weight(_text_:c in 1216) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014753518 = score(doc=1216,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044891298 = queryNorm
            0.09527725 = fieldWeight in 1216, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=1216)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  2. Ratzek, W.: Schwarze Löcher : Im Sog der Informations- und Wissensindustrie (2005) 0.00 
    0.0024589198 = product of:
  0.0049178395 = sum of:
    0.0049178395 = product of:
      0.014753518 = sum of:
        0.014753518 = weight(_text_:c in 1433) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014753518 = score(doc=1433,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044891298 = queryNorm
            0.09527725 = fieldWeight in 1433, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=1433)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Footnote
    1. in wörtlicher Bedeutung heißt Information also das Versehen von etwas in einer Form, Gestaltgebung 2. in übertragenem Sinne heißt Information genau das gleiche wie unser Wort Bildung welches gleichfalls übertragen gebraucht wird... informatio als Bildung differenziert sich nun wieder in zwei Unterbedeutungen: a) Bildung durch Unterrichtung aa) informatio als Vorgang und ab) informatio als Ergebnis Zur Problematik zwischen Information und Wissen führt er auch die US-Zukunftsforscher Matthias Horx und den alten weisen Josef Weizenbaum an. Dessen scharfe und pointierte Kritik an der Internet-Euphorie liest man heute noch mit Vergnügen. Damit wird einer allzu simplen nationalen Zuweisungen von Vorlieben für Informationswirtschaft als "typisch amerikanisch" und allen kritiklosen Adepten einer Computergläubigkeit eine Absage erteilt. (S.41/42). Es ist erstaunlich, dass es Ratzek gelingt, den thematischen Umfang des Buches in nur drei großen Abschnitten unterzubringen, die er Teil A: Grundlagen, Teil B: Techniksynopse und Teil C: Visionen nennt. Die unter diesen Teilen aufgeführten Kapitel folgen ohne Abweichungen den vorgegebenen Themen. Die knapp gehaltenen Zusammenfassungen werden von sehr klaren und anschaulichen Grafiken unterstrichen. Um diese sehr stringente Einteilung nicht zu unterbrechen, gibt es bisweilen Exkurse, die kleine historische oder auch philosophische Ausflüge erlauben. Dies ist notwendig, denn Ratzek versucht nicht nur die von ihm vorgegebene Problematik immer wieder aufzunehmen, sondern er will diese auch auf allen Feldern der Informationstechnologie exemplifizieren. Dazu gehören nicht nur die Informationstechnologie und ihre diversen Apparate sowie die Netzwerke wie Telefon und Fernsehen, die letztendlich zu dem immer wieder durchscheinenden Credo des Autors führen: "...weil es eine Pflicht für Informationswissenschaftler ist, zu denen der Autor gehört, diesen Unterschied zu erkennen und darauf hinzuweisen, dass nicht die Informatisierung der Gesellschaft und Wirtschaft das Ziel sein kann, sondern der sinnvolle Umgang mit Information und Wissen." (S.177)
  3. Schmölders, C.: Europa als Wunderkammer : Die EU-Kommission will eine virtuelle Arche Noah der europäischen Kulturgüter schaffen (2008) 0.00 
    0.0024589198 = product of:
  0.0049178395 = sum of:
    0.0049178395 = product of:
      0.014753518 = sum of:
        0.014753518 = weight(_text_:c in 2571) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014753518 = score(doc=2571,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044891298 = queryNorm
            0.09527725 = fieldWeight in 2571, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2571)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  4. Web 2.0 in der Unternehmenspraxis : Grundlagen, Fallstudien und Trends zum Einsatz von Social-Software (2009) 0.00 
    0.0024589198 = product of:
  0.0049178395 = sum of:
    0.0049178395 = product of:
      0.014753518 = sum of:
        0.014753518 = weight(_text_:c in 2917) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014753518 = score(doc=2917,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044891298 = queryNorm
            0.09527725 = fieldWeight in 2917, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2917)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Footnote
    Rez. in: IWP 60(1009) H.4, S.245-246 (C. Wolff): "Der von Andrea Back (St. Gallen), Norbert Gronau (Potsdam) und Klaus Tochtermann herausgegebene Sammelband "Web 2.0 in der Unternehmenspraxis" verbindet in schlüssiger Weise die systematische Einführung in die Themen Web 2.0 und social software mit der Darstellung von Möglichkeiten, solche neuen Informationssysteme für Veränderungen im Unternehmen zu nutzen und zeigt dies anhand einer ganzen Reihe einzelner Fallstudien auf. Auch zukünftige Anwendungen wie das social semantic web werden als Entwicklungschance erörtert. In einer knappen Einleitung werden kurz die wesentlichen Begriffe wie Web 2.0, social software oder "Enterprise 2.0" eingeführt und der Aufbau des Bandes wird erläutert. Das sehr viel umfangreichere zweite Kapitel führt in die wesentlichen Systemtypen der social software ein: Erläutert werden Wikis, Weblogs, Social Bookmarking, Social Tagging, Podcasting, Newsfeeds, Communities und soziale Netzwerke sowie die technischen Besonderheiten von social software. Die Aufteilung ist überzeugend, für jeden Systemtyp werden nicht nur wesentliche Funktionen, sondern auch typische Anwendungen und insbesondere das Potenzial zur Nutzung im Unternehmen, insbesondere mit Blick auf Fragen des Wissensmanagements erläutert. Teilweise können die Autoren auch aktuelle Nutzungsdaten der Systeme ergänzen. Auch wenn bei der hohen Entwicklungsdynamik der social software-Systeme ständig neue Formen an Bedeutung gewinnen, vermag die Einteilung der Autoren zu überzeugen.
  5. Good tags - bad tags : Social Tagging in der Wissensorganisation (2008) 0.00 
    0.0024589198 = product of:
  0.0049178395 = sum of:
    0.0049178395 = product of:
      0.014753518 = sum of:
        0.014753518 = weight(_text_:c in 3054) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014753518 = score(doc=3054,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044891298 = queryNorm
            0.09527725 = fieldWeight in 3054, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=3054)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Footnote
    Enthält die Beiträge der Tagung "Social Tagging in der Wissensorganisation" am 21.-22.02.2008 am Institut für Wissensmedien (IWM) in Tübingen. Volltext unter: http://www.waxmann.com/kat/inhalt/2039Volltext.pdf. Vgl. die Rez. unter: http://sehepunkte.de/2008/11/14934.html. Rez. in: IWP 60(1009) H.4, S.246-247 (C. Wolff): "Tagging-Systeme erfreuen sich in den letzten Jahren einer ungemein großen Beliebtheit, erlauben sie dem Nutzer doch die Informationserschließung "mit eigenen Worten", also ohne Rekurs auf vorgegebene Ordnungs- und Begriffsysteme und für Medien wie Bild und Video, für die herkömmliche Verfahren des Information Retrieval (noch) versagen. Die Beherrschung der Film- und Bilderfülle, wie wir sie bei Flickr oder YouTube vorfinden, ist mit anderen Mitteln als dem intellektuellen Einsatz der Nutzer nicht vorstellbar - eine professionelle Aufbereitung angesichts der Massendaten (und ihrer zu einem großen Teil auch minderen Qualität) nicht möglich und sinnvoll. Insofern hat sich Tagging als ein probates Mittel der Erschließung herausgebildet, das dort Lücken füllen kann, wo andere Verfahren (Erschließung durch information professionals, automatische Indexierung, Erschließung durch Autoren) fehlen oder nicht anwendbar sind. Unter dem Titel "Good Tags - Bad Tags. Social Tagging in der Wissensorganisation" und der Herausgeberschaft von Birgit Gaiser, Thorsten Hampel und Stefanie Panke sind in der Reihe Medien in der Wissenschaft (Bd. 47) Beiträge eines interdisziplinären Workshops der Gesellschaft für Medien in der Wissenschaft zum Thema Tagging versammelt, der im Frühjahr 2008 am Institut für Wissensmedien in Tübingen stattgefunden hat. . . .
  6. Altenhöner, R.; Gömpel, R.; Jahns, Y.; Junger, U.; Mahnke, C.; Meyer, A.; Oehlschläger, S.: Weltkongress Bibliothek und Information 75. IFLA-Generalkonferenz in Mailand, Italien : Aus den Veranstaltungen der Division IV Bibliographic Control und ihren Sektionen und der Arbeitsgruppe für die Informationsgesellschaft (2009) 0.00 
    0.0024589198 = product of:
  0.0049178395 = sum of:
    0.0049178395 = product of:
      0.014753518 = sum of:
        0.014753518 = weight(_text_:c in 3147) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014753518 = score(doc=3147,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044891298 = queryNorm
            0.09527725 = fieldWeight in 3147, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=3147)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  7. Facets: a fruitful notion in many domains : special issue on facet analysis (2008) 0.00 
    0.0024589198 = product of:
  0.0049178395 = sum of:
    0.0049178395 = product of:
      0.014753518 = sum of:
        0.014753518 = weight(_text_:c in 3262) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014753518 = score(doc=3262,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044891298 = queryNorm
            0.09527725 = fieldWeight in 3262, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=3262)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Editor
    Gnoli, C.
  8. Koch, C.: Bewusstsein : ein neurobiologisches Rätsel (2005) 0.00 
    0.0024589198 = product of:
  0.0049178395 = sum of:
    0.0049178395 = product of:
      0.014753518 = sum of:
        0.014753518 = weight(_text_:c in 4559) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014753518 = score(doc=4559,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044891298 = queryNorm
            0.09527725 = fieldWeight in 4559, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=4559)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  9. Information und Wissen : global, sozial und frei? Proceedings des 12. Internationalen Symposiums für Informationswissenschaft (ISI 2011) ; Hildesheim, 9. - 11. März 2011 (2010) 0.00 
    0.0024589198 = product of:
  0.0049178395 = sum of:
    0.0049178395 = product of:
      0.014753518 = sum of:
        0.014753518 = weight(_text_:c in 5190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014753518 = score(doc=5190,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044891298 = queryNorm
            0.09527725 = fieldWeight in 5190, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=5190)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Editor
    Griesbaum, J., T. Mandl u. C. Womser-Hacker
  10. Büssow, J.; Tauss, J.; Scheithauer, I.; Bayer, M.: ¬Ein Kampf gegen den Rechtsextrimismus - oder gegen das Internet? : Der Düsseldorfer Regierungspräsident Jürgen Büssow und der Medienexperte Jörg Tauss (beide SPD) streiten über Sperren und Filter für das Web (2002) 0.00 
    0.0023519443 = product of:
  0.0047038887 = sum of:
    0.0047038887 = product of:
      0.014111666 = sum of:
        0.014111666 = weight(_text_:i in 1738) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014111666 = score(doc=1738,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16931784 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044891298 = queryNorm
            0.083344236 = fieldWeight in 1738, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=1738)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  11. Gonzalez, L.: What is FRBR? (2005) 0.00 
    0.0023519443 = product of:
  0.0047038887 = sum of:
    0.0047038887 = product of:
      0.014111666 = sum of:
        0.014111666 = weight(_text_:i in 3401) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014111666 = score(doc=3401,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16931784 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044891298 = queryNorm
            0.083344236 = fieldWeight in 3401, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=3401)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    What are these two Beowulf translations "expressions" of? I used the term work above, an even more abstract concept in the FRBR model. In this case, the "work" is Beowulf , that ancient intellectual creation or effort that over time has been expressed in multiple ways, each manifested in several different ways itself, with one or more items in each manifestation. This is a pretty gross oversimplification of FRBR, which also details other relationships: among these entities; between these entities and various persons (such as creators, publishers, and owners); and between these entities and their subjects. It also specifies characteristics, or "attributes," of the different types of entities (such as title, physical media, date, availability, and more.). But it should be enough to grasp the possibilities. Now apply it Imagine that you have a patron who needs a copy of Heaney's translation of Beowulf . She doesn't care who published it or when, only that it's Heaney's translation. What if you (or your patron) could place an interlibrary loan call on that expression, instead of looking through multiple bibliographic records (as of March, OCLC's WorldCat had nine regular print editions) for multiple manifestations and then judging which record is the best bet on which to place a request? Combine that with functionality that lets you specify "not Braille, not large print," and it could save you time. Now imagine a patron in want of a copy, any copy, in English, of Romeo and Juliet. Saving staff time means saving money. Whether or not this actually happens depends upon what the library community decides to do with FRBR. It is not a set of cataloging rules or a system design, but it can influence both. Several library system vendors are working with FRBR ideas; VTLS's current integrated library system product Virtua incorporates FRBR concepts in its design. More vendors may follow. How the Joint Steering Committee for Revision of Anglo-American Cataloging Rules develops the Anglo-American Cataloging Rules (AACR) to incorporate FRBR will necessarily be a strong determinant of how records work in a "FRBR-ized" bibliographic database.
  12. Information und Sprache : Beiträge zu Informationswissenschaft, Computerlinguistik, Bibliothekswesen und verwandten Fächern. Festschrift für Harald H. Zimmermann. Herausgegeben von Ilse Harms, Heinz-Dirk Luckhardt und Hans W. Giessen (2006) 0.00 
    0.0023519443 = product of:
  0.0047038887 = sum of:
    0.0047038887 = product of:
      0.014111666 = sum of:
        0.014111666 = weight(_text_:i in 91) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014111666 = score(doc=91,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16931784 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044891298 = queryNorm
            0.083344236 = fieldWeight in 91, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=91)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Editor
    Harms, I. u.a.
  13. Wikipedia : das Buch : aus der freien Enzyklopädie Wikipedia ; [mit der DVD-ROM Wikipedia 2005/2006] (2005) 0.00 
    0.0023519443 = product of:
  0.0047038887 = sum of:
    0.0047038887 = product of:
      0.014111666 = sum of:
        0.014111666 = weight(_text_:i in 118) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014111666 = score(doc=118,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16931784 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044891298 = queryNorm
            0.083344236 = fieldWeight in 118, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=118)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Type
    i
  14. Design and usability of digital libraries : case studies in the Asia-Pacific (2005) 0.00 
    0.0023519443 = product of:
  0.0047038887 = sum of:
    0.0047038887 = product of:
      0.014111666 = sum of:
        0.014111666 = weight(_text_:i in 93) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014111666 = score(doc=93,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16931784 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044891298 = queryNorm
            0.083344236 = fieldWeight in 93, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=93)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Footnote
    The chapters are generally less than 20 pages, which allows for concise presentations of each case study. Each chapter contains, more or less, a brief abstract, introduction, related works section, methodology section, conclusion, and references. The chapters are further categorized into six thematic sections. Section I focuses on the history of digital libraries in the Asia Pacific. Section II, composed of four chapters, focuses on the design architecture and systems of digital libraries. The next five chapters, in section III, examine challenges in implementing digital library systems. This section is particularly interesting because issues such as multicultural and multilingual barriers are discussed. Section IV is about the use of and impact of digital libraries in a society. All four chapters in this section emphasize improvements that need to be made to digital libraries regarding different types of users. Particularly important is chapter 14, which discusses digital libraries and their effects on youth. The conclusion of this case study revealed that digital libraries need to support peer learning, as there are many social benefits for youth from interacting with peers. Section V, which focuses on users and usability, consists of five chapters. This section relates directly to the implementation challenges that are mentioned in section III, providing specific examples of cross-cultural issues among users that need to be taken into consideration. In addition, section V discusses the differences in media types and the difficulties with transforming these resources into digital formats. For example, chapter 18, which is about designing a music digital library, demonstrates the difficulties in selecting from the numerous types of technologies that can be used to digitize library collections. Finally, the chapter in section VI discusses the future trends of digital libraries. The editors successfully present diverse perspectives about digital libraries, by including case studies performed in numerous different countries throughout the Asia Pacific region. Countries represented in the case studies include Indonesia, Taiwan, India, China, Singapore, New Zealand, Hong Kong, Philippines, Japan, and Malaysia. The diversity of the users in these countries helps to illustrate the numerous differences and similarities that digital library designers need to take into consideration in the future when developing a universal digital library system. In order to create a successful digital library system that can benefit all users, there must be a sense of balance in the technology used, and the authors of the case studies in this book have definitely proved that there are distinct barriers that need to be overcome in order to achieve this harmony.
  15. Lambe, P.: Organising knowledge : taxonomies, knowledge and organisational effectiveness (2007) 0.00 
    0.0023519443 = product of:
  0.0047038887 = sum of:
    0.0047038887 = product of:
      0.014111666 = sum of:
        0.014111666 = weight(_text_:i in 1804) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014111666 = score(doc=1804,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16931784 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044891298 = queryNorm
            0.083344236 = fieldWeight in 1804, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=1804)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Footnote
    While each single paragraph of the book is packed with valuable advice and real-life experience, I consider the last chapter to be the most intriguing and ground-breaking one. It's only here that taxonomists meet folksonomists and ontologists in a fundamental attempt to write a new page on the relative position between old and emerging classification techniques. In a well-balanced and sober analysis that foregoes excessive enthusiasm in favor of more appropriate considerations about content scale, domain maturity, precision and cost, knowledge infrastructure tools are all arrayed from inexpensive and expressive folksonomies on one side, to the smart, formal, machine-readable but expensive world of ontologies on the other. In light of so many different tools, information infrastructure clearly appears more as a complex dynamic ecosystem than a static overly designed environment. Such a variety of tasks, perspectives, work activities and paradigms calls for a resilient, adaptive and flexible knowledge environment with a minimum of standardization and uniformity. The right mix of tools and approaches can only be determined case by case, by carefully considering the particular objectives and requirements of the organization while aiming to maximize its overall performance and effectiveness. Starting from the history of taxonomy-building and ending with the emerging trends in Web technologies, artificial intelligence and social computing, Organising Knowledge is thus both a guiding tool and inspirational reading, not only about taxonomies, but also about effectiveness, collaboration and finding middle ground: exactly the right principles to make your intranet, portal or document management tool a rich, evolving and long-lasting ecosystem."
  16. Broughton, V.: Essential thesaurus construction (2006) 0.00 
    0.0023519443 = product of:
  0.0047038887 = sum of:
    0.0047038887 = product of:
      0.014111666 = sum of:
        0.014111666 = weight(_text_:i in 2924) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014111666 = score(doc=2924,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16931784 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044891298 = queryNorm
            0.083344236 = fieldWeight in 2924, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=2924)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Footnote
    Weitere Rez. in: New Library World 108(2007) nos.3/4, S.190-191 (K.V. Trickey): "Vanda has provided a very useful work that will enable any reader who is prepared to follow her instruction to produce a thesaurus that will be a quality language-based subject access tool that will make the task of information retrieval easier and more effective. Once again I express my gratitude to Vanda for producing another excellent book." - Electronic Library 24(2006) no.6, S.866-867 (A.G. Smith): "Essential thesaurus construction is an ideal instructional text, with clear bullet point summaries at the ends of sections, and relevant and up to date references, putting thesauri in context with the general theory of information retrieval. But it will also be a valuable reference for any information professional developing or using a controlled vocabulary." - KO 33(2006) no.4, S.215-216 (M.P. Satija)
  17. Baker, N.: Seelenverkäufer oder Helden? : Ken Aulettas Buch über die weltbeherrschende Suchmaschine Google (2009) 0.00 
    0.0023519443 = product of:
  0.0047038887 = sum of:
    0.0047038887 = product of:
      0.014111666 = sum of:
        0.014111666 = weight(_text_:i in 3224) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014111666 = score(doc=3224,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16931784 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044891298 = queryNorm
            0.083344236 = fieldWeight in 3224, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=3224)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Denn das eine kann ich Ihnen sagen - ich erinnere mich noch, wie es früher war, vor Google. Nicht dass es ein dunkles Zeitalter gewesen wäre: Es gab schnurlose Telefone, und die Leute durften bequeme Pullis tragen. Es gab AltaVista und AskJeeves, HotBot und Excite, Infoseek und Northern Light - mit seinen tief verzweigten Ergebnislisten und dem eleganten Segelschiff im Logo. Und wenn man mal mehrere Gewässer gleichzeitig durchkämmen wollte, gab es MetaCrawler. Aber die Ausbeute war ziemlich wahllos und dauerte vor allem lange. Man saß da, mampfte seine Chips und wartete darauf, dass der Bildschirm sich füllte. 1998 kam dann Google, sauber und unglaublich schnell. Es war wie eine aufgeräumte weiße Schreibtischplatte mit einer einzelnen reifen Tomate darauf. Keine Werbung - Google war damals noch gegen Werbung eingestellt. Außerdem war es hochintelligent; man bekam fast nie einen falschen Treffer. Man musste die beiden unzertrennlichen Studenten Page und Brin, die ihre geheimen Suchalgorithmen zur Anwendung gebracht hatten, nicht kennen, um zu wissen, dass es sich um zwei geniale Computerfreaks in Turnschuhen, aber mit viel Selbstvertrauen handelte. Der weiße Bildschirm und der Button mit der Aufschrift "I´m Feeling Lucky" brachte das klar zum Ausdruck. Google würde uns allen Glück bringen; das war die Botschaft. Und so kam es dann auch.Warum sind die prominenten Geschäftsführer dann nicht zufrieden? Weil Google viel Geld mit Werbung verdient, und die Werbeetats sind begrenzt. Im letzten Jahr kam der Gewinn fast ausschließlich aus der einzig wirklich lästigen Sparte, die das Unternehmen betreibt - den kleinen, billigen Textanzeigen. Die so genannten AdWords- oder AdSense-Anzeigen sind schnell geladen und angeblich "höflich", in dem Sinne, dass sie nicht blinken und keine Popup-Fenster aufmachen, und man sieht sie jetzt überall - auf Seiten wie dem Portal der Washington Post, auf MySpace und Discovery.com und auch auf Hunderttausenden von kleinen Seiten und Blogs. "Das ist unsere eigentliche Einnahmequelle", sagte Larry Page in einer Sitzung, an der Auletta 2007 teilnahm. Geworben wird für "Laser-Haarentfernung", "Gläubige Singles", "Mit Verkehrsstaus Geld verdienen", "Haben Sie Anspruch auf Schmerzensgeld?", "Anti-Bauchfett-Rezepte", "Bloggen Sie sich reich", "Jeder kann ein Buch schreiben" und so weiter. Unzählige Internetseiten sind aufgetaucht, die nur dazu dienen, AdSense-Anzeigen zu schalten. Sie benutzen gestohlene Inhalte oder schmeißen Texte von Wikipedia und ähnlichen Seiten zusammen und säumen die Ränder mit Google-Anzeigen. Diese funktionieren pro Klick, das heißt, der Auftraggeber zahlt nur dann an Google, wenn auch tatsächlich jemand auf die Anzeige klickt. Pro Aufruf zahlt er dann 25 Cent oder einen Dollar oder (für ganz besonders beliebte Stichworte wie "Schmerzensgeldanspruch") auch zehn Dollar oder mehr.
  18. Broughton, V.: Essential classification (2004) 0.00 
    0.0023519443 = product of:
  0.0047038887 = sum of:
    0.0047038887 = product of:
      0.014111666 = sum of:
        0.014111666 = weight(_text_:i in 2824) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014111666 = score(doc=2824,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16931784 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044891298 = queryNorm
            0.083344236 = fieldWeight in 2824, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=2824)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Footnote
    Rez. in: KO 32(2005) no.1, S.47-49 (M. Hudon): "Vanda Broughton's Essential Classification is the most recent addition to a very small set of classification textbooks published over the past few years. The book's 21 chapters are based very closely an the cataloguing and classification module at the School of Library, Archive, and Information studies at University College, London. The author's main objective is clear: this is "first and foremost a book about how to classify. The emphasis throughout is an the activity of classification rather than the theory, the practical problems of the organization of collections, and the needs of the users" (p. 1). This is not a theoretical work, but a basic course in classification and classification scheme application. For this reviewer, who also teaches "Classification 101," this is also a fascinating peek into how a colleague organizes content and structures her course. "Classification is everywhere" (p. 1): the first sentence of this book is also one of the first statements in my own course, and Professor Broughton's metaphors - the supermarket, canned peas, flowers, etc. - are those that are used by our colleagues around the world. The combination of tone, writing style and content display are reader-friendly; they are in fact what make this book remarkable and what distinguishes it from more "formal" textbooks, such as The Organization of Information, the superb text written and recently updated (2004) by Professor Arlene Taylor (2nd ed. Westport, Conn.: Libraries Unlimited, 2004). Reading Essential Classification, at times, feels like being in a classroom, facing a teacher who assures you that "you don't need to worry about this at this stage" (p. 104), and reassures you that, although you now speed a long time looking for things, "you will soon speed up when you get to know the scheme better" (p. 137). This teacher uses redundancy in a productive fashion, and she is not afraid to express her own opinions ("I think that if these concepts are helpful they may be used" (p. 245); "It's annoying that LCC doesn't provide clearer instructions, but if you keep your head and take them one step at a time [i.e. the tables] they're fairly straightforward" (p. 174)). Chapters 1 to 7 present the essential theoretical concepts relating to knowledge organization and to bibliographic classification. The author is adept at making and explaining distinctions: known-item retrieval versus subject retrieval, personal versus public/shared/official classification systems, scientific versus folk classification systems, object versus aspect classification systems, semantic versus syntactic relationships, and so on. Chapters 8 and 9 discuss the practice of classification, through content analysis and subject description. A short discussion of difficult subjects, namely the treatment of unique concepts (persons, places, etc.) as subjects seems a little advanced for a beginners' class.
  19. Hassemer, W.: Haltet den geborenen Dieb! (2010) 0.00 
    0.0020273838 = product of:
  0.0040547675 = sum of:
    0.0040547675 = product of:
      0.012164302 = sum of:
        0.012164302 = weight(_text_:22 in 173) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012164302 = score(doc=173,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15720168 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044891298 = queryNorm
            0.07738023 = fieldWeight in 173, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=173)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Footnote
    Vgl. die Erwiderungs- und Fortsetzungsbeiträge: Roth, G., G. Merkel: Haltet den Richter!: Schuld und Strafe. In: Frankfurter Rundschau. Nr.xxx vom 26.06.2010, S.xx. Walter, M.: Unzulässige Überinterpretation: Schuld und Strafe. In: Frankfurter Rundschau. Nr.xxx vom 05.07.2010, S.xx. Janich, P.: Stillschweigende Hirngespinste: Die FR-Debatte zur Willensfreiheit. In: Frankfurter Rundschau. Nr.158 vom 12.07.2010, S.20-21. Lüderssen, K.: Wer determiniert die Hirnforscher?: Was ist Willensfreiheit (4). [Interview]. In: Frankfurter Rundschau. Nr.164 vom 19.07.2010, S.20-21. Pauen, M.: Das Schuldprinzip antasten, ohne es abzuschaffen: Was ist Willensfreiheit (5) oder: Wer ist verantwortlich für die Abschaffung von Verantwortung?. In: Frankfurter Rundschau. Nr.170 vom 26.07.2010, S.22-23. Vgl.: http://www.faz.net/s/RubCF3AEB154CE64960822FA5429A182360/Doc~E384DC40FFB99469F8C26751F979BFCBF~ATpl~Ecommon~Scontent~Afor~Eprint.html.
  20. Hilberer, T.: Aufwand vs. Nutzen : Wie sollen deutsche wissenschaftliche Bibliotheken künftig katalogisieren? (2003) 0.00 
    0.0020273838 = product of:
  0.0040547675 = sum of:
    0.0040547675 = product of:
      0.012164302 = sum of:
        0.012164302 = weight(_text_:22 in 1733) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012164302 = score(doc=1733,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15720168 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044891298 = queryNorm
            0.07738023 = fieldWeight in 1733, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=1733)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 6.2003 12:13:13

Authors

Years

Languages

Types

Themes

Subjects

Classifications