Search (465 results, page 1 of 24)

  • × theme_ss:"Informationsdienstleistungen"
  1. Yoo, E.-Y.; Robbins, L.S.: Understanding middle-aged women's health information seeking on the web : a theoretical approach (2008) 0.07
    0.06665209 = product of:
      0.13330418 = sum of:
        0.13330418 = sum of:
          0.048170578 = weight(_text_:science in 2973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.048170578 = score(doc=2973,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13793045 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052363027 = queryNorm
              0.34923816 = fieldWeight in 2973, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2973)
          0.085133605 = weight(_text_:22 in 2973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.085133605 = score(doc=2973,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1833664 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052363027 = queryNorm
              0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2973, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2973)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    9. 2.2008 17:52:22
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 59(2008) no.4, S.577-590
  2. Bryson, J.: Managing information services : an integrated approach (1997) 0.07
    0.06665209 = product of:
      0.13330418 = sum of:
        0.13330418 = sum of:
          0.048170578 = weight(_text_:science in 1630) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.048170578 = score(doc=1630,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13793045 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052363027 = queryNorm
              0.34923816 = fieldWeight in 1630, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1630)
          0.085133605 = weight(_text_:22 in 1630) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.085133605 = score(doc=1630,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1833664 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052363027 = queryNorm
              0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1630, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1630)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    31.12.1998 22:01:11
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Journal of librarianship and information science 30(1998) no.2, S.146-148 (S.P. Webb)
  3. Nicholas, D.: Assessing information needs : tools and techniques (1996) 0.06
    0.05554341 = product of:
      0.11108682 = sum of:
        0.11108682 = sum of:
          0.04014215 = weight(_text_:science in 5941) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04014215 = score(doc=5941,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13793045 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052363027 = queryNorm
              0.2910318 = fieldWeight in 5941, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5941)
          0.070944674 = weight(_text_:22 in 5941) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.070944674 = score(doc=5941,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1833664 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052363027 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5941, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5941)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    26. 2.2008 19:22:51
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Assignation. 14(1997) no.2, S.24 (S. Vogel); Journal of librarianship and information science 30(1998) no.1, S.68 (J. Secker)
  4. Rowley, J.: ¬The changing face of current awareness services (1998) 0.05
    0.049165577 = product of:
      0.09833115 = sum of:
        0.09833115 = sum of:
          0.028099505 = weight(_text_:science in 3043) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.028099505 = score(doc=3043,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13793045 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052363027 = queryNorm
              0.20372227 = fieldWeight in 3043, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3043)
          0.07023165 = weight(_text_:22 in 3043) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07023165 = score(doc=3043,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.1833664 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052363027 = queryNorm
              0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 3043, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3043)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    9. 2.1997 18:44:22
    22. 2.1999 17:48:45
    Source
    Journal of librarianship and information science. 30(1998) no.3, S.177-183
  5. Cromer, D.E.; Testi, A.R.: Integrated continuing education for reference librarians (1994) 0.04
    0.044699986 = product of:
      0.08939997 = sum of:
        0.08939997 = sum of:
          0.0397387 = weight(_text_:science in 211) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0397387 = score(doc=211,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.13793045 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052363027 = queryNorm
              0.2881068 = fieldWeight in 211, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=211)
          0.04966127 = weight(_text_:22 in 211) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04966127 = score(doc=211,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1833664 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052363027 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 211, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=211)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Professional librarians operate in an environment characterized by a high level of change. In order to respond to this information environment, it is essential for science and engineering librarians to keep pace with the staggering growth in research information and resources, and with the heightened expectation of the populations with which they interact. The paradox of the need for subject specificity coupled with the need for diversity of subject knowledge presents reference librarians with an unusual challenge. Continuing education programs that are woven into the fabric of job responsibilities can be utilized effectively to enhance the abilities of reference librarians and the quality of services delivered. In this article, Cromer and Testi present a model of a structured, integrated continuing education program for reference librarians utilized at the University of New Mexico's Centennial Science and Engineering Library
    Source
    Reference services review. 22(1994) no.4, S.51-58
  6. Gill, H.S.; Yates-Mercer, P.: ¬The dissemination of information by local authorities on the World Wide Web (1998) 0.04
    0.04443473 = product of:
      0.08886946 = sum of:
        0.08886946 = sum of:
          0.03211372 = weight(_text_:science in 4367) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03211372 = score(doc=4367,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13793045 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052363027 = queryNorm
              0.23282544 = fieldWeight in 4367, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4367)
          0.05675574 = weight(_text_:22 in 4367) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05675574 = score(doc=4367,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1833664 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052363027 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4367, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4367)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    10. 1.1999 17:22:49
    Source
    Journal of information science. 24(1998) no.2, S.105-112
  7. Julien, H.: Bibliographic instruction trends in Canadian academic libraries (1997) 0.04
    0.04443473 = product of:
      0.08886946 = sum of:
        0.08886946 = sum of:
          0.03211372 = weight(_text_:science in 2072) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03211372 = score(doc=2072,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13793045 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052363027 = queryNorm
              0.23282544 = fieldWeight in 2072, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2072)
          0.05675574 = weight(_text_:22 in 2072) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05675574 = score(doc=2072,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1833664 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052363027 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2072, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2072)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Canadian journal of information and library science. 22(1997) no.2, S.1-15
  8. Broady, J.E.: Costing of bibliographic services (1997) 0.04
    0.04214192 = product of:
      0.08428384 = sum of:
        0.08428384 = sum of:
          0.024085289 = weight(_text_:science in 648) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.024085289 = score(doc=648,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13793045 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052363027 = queryNorm
              0.17461908 = fieldWeight in 648, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=648)
          0.060198557 = weight(_text_:22 in 648) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.060198557 = score(doc=648,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.1833664 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052363027 = queryNorm
              0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 648, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=648)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    9. 2.1997 18:44:22
    22. 9.1997 18:41:15
    Source
    Journal of librarianship and information science. 29(1997) no.2, S.89-94
  9. Smet, E. de: Evaluation of a computerised community information system through transaction analysis and user survey (1995) 0.04
    0.03888039 = product of:
      0.07776078 = sum of:
        0.07776078 = sum of:
          0.028099505 = weight(_text_:science in 2304) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.028099505 = score(doc=2304,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13793045 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052363027 = queryNorm
              0.20372227 = fieldWeight in 2304, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2304)
          0.04966127 = weight(_text_:22 in 2304) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04966127 = score(doc=2304,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1833664 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052363027 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2304, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2304)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Reports on the results of a transaction analysis and user survey, evaluating a pilot system for computerized community information in a public library, based on the GDIS system (Gemeenschaps Informatie Documentair System). The non hierarchical and global approach to the integrated database proved to be useful for novice users. Out of many parameters only frequency of use correlates with retrieval success. The online questionnaire proved to be worthwhile although restricted in scope. The logbook transaction analysis yielded a rich amount of useful management information for the systems managers. The user survey yielded a rich set of data on which to perform statistical analyses according to social science practice, from which some interesting relations could be detected
    Date
    23.10.1995 19:22:11
  10. Shaw, D.: Challenges of information technology in improving information services (1997) 0.04
    0.03888039 = product of:
      0.07776078 = sum of:
        0.07776078 = sum of:
          0.028099505 = weight(_text_:science in 3034) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.028099505 = score(doc=3034,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13793045 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052363027 = queryNorm
              0.20372227 = fieldWeight in 3034, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3034)
          0.04966127 = weight(_text_:22 in 3034) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04966127 = score(doc=3034,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1833664 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052363027 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3034, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3034)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 2.1999 16:50:03
    Source
    Journal of information; communication; and library science. 4(1997) no.1, S.3-9
  11. Pennanen, M.; Vakkari, P.: Students' conceptual structure, search process, and outcome while preparing a research proposal : a longitudinal case study (2003) 0.04
    0.035118267 = product of:
      0.070236534 = sum of:
        0.070236534 = sum of:
          0.020071074 = weight(_text_:science in 1682) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.020071074 = score(doc=1682,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13793045 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052363027 = queryNorm
              0.1455159 = fieldWeight in 1682, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1682)
          0.05016546 = weight(_text_:22 in 1682) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05016546 = score(doc=1682,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.1833664 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052363027 = queryNorm
              0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 1682, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1682)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This article focuses an analysing students' information needs in terms of conceptual understanding of the topic they propose to study and its consequences for the search process and outcome. The research subjects were 22 undergraduates of psychology attending a seminar for preparing a research proposal for a small empirical study. They were asked to make searches in the PsycINFO database for their task in the beginning and end of the seminar. A pre- and postsearch interview was conducted in both sessions. The students were asked to think aloud in the sessions. This was recorded, as were the transaction logs. The results show that during the preparation of research proposals different features of the students' conceptual structure were connected to the search success. Students' ability to cover their conceptual construct by query terms was the major feature affecting search success during the whole process. In the beginning also the number of concepts and the proportion of subconcepts in the construct contributed indirectly via search tactics to retrieving partly useful references. Students' ability to extract new query terms from retrieved items improved search results.
    Date
    19. 6.2003 17:22:33
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 54(2003) no.8, S.759-770
  12. Lin, S.-j.; Belkin, N.: Validation of a model of information seeking over multiple search sessions (2005) 0.03
    0.033326045 = product of:
      0.06665209 = sum of:
        0.06665209 = sum of:
          0.024085289 = weight(_text_:science in 3450) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.024085289 = score(doc=3450,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13793045 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052363027 = queryNorm
              0.17461908 = fieldWeight in 3450, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3450)
          0.042566802 = weight(_text_:22 in 3450) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042566802 = score(doc=3450,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1833664 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052363027 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3450, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3450)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    10. 4.2005 14:52:22
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 56(2005) no.4, S.393-415
  13. Koopmans, N.I.: What's your question? : The need for research information from the perspective of different user groups (2002) 0.03
    0.033326045 = product of:
      0.06665209 = sum of:
        0.06665209 = sum of:
          0.024085289 = weight(_text_:science in 3612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.024085289 = score(doc=3612,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13793045 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052363027 = queryNorm
              0.17461908 = fieldWeight in 3612, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3612)
          0.042566802 = weight(_text_:22 in 3612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042566802 = score(doc=3612,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1833664 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052363027 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3612, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3612)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    In this paper results of a field study into the need for research information of different user groups are presented: scientists, policy makers and policy researchers, industry and media. Main questions of semi-structured interviews were: what kind of research information users need, what kind of research information resources are used and which information resources are missing at the moment. User groups are missing for a diversity of reasons the overview of research, experts and institutes in the different scientific fields. Especially for the accessibility and transparency of the scientific world these overviews are reported to be needed. Neither Google nor any of the research institutes or policy research organisations are able to present surveys for different science fields at the moment. Giving users the possibility to search, browse and navigate through accessible and more specialised layers of research information might give answers to different user groups simultaneously.
    Date
    2. 7.2005 12:22:50
  14. Lamb, R.; King, J.L.; Kling, R.: Informational environments : organizational contexts of online information use (2003) 0.03
    0.033326045 = product of:
      0.06665209 = sum of:
        0.06665209 = sum of:
          0.024085289 = weight(_text_:science in 5149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.024085289 = score(doc=5149,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13793045 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052363027 = queryNorm
              0.17461908 = fieldWeight in 5149, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5149)
          0.042566802 = weight(_text_:22 in 5149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042566802 = score(doc=5149,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1833664 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052363027 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5149, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5149)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    5. 7.2006 18:43:22
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 54(2003) no.2, S.97-114
  15. Kim, J.: Describing and predicting information-seeking behavior on the Web (2009) 0.03
    0.033326045 = product of:
      0.06665209 = sum of:
        0.06665209 = sum of:
          0.024085289 = weight(_text_:science in 2747) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.024085289 = score(doc=2747,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13793045 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052363027 = queryNorm
              0.17461908 = fieldWeight in 2747, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2747)
          0.042566802 = weight(_text_:22 in 2747) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042566802 = score(doc=2747,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1833664 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052363027 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2747, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2747)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2009 18:54:15
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.4, S.679-693
  16. Wilson, T.: ¬The information user : past, present and future (2009) 0.03
    0.033326045 = product of:
      0.06665209 = sum of:
        0.06665209 = sum of:
          0.024085289 = weight(_text_:science in 3654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.024085289 = score(doc=3654,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13793045 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052363027 = queryNorm
              0.17461908 = fieldWeight in 3654, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3654)
          0.042566802 = weight(_text_:22 in 3654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042566802 = score(doc=3654,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1833664 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052363027 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3654, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3654)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    8. 7.2010 19:09:22
    Source
    Information science in transition, Ed.: A. Gilchrist
  17. Zhang, X.; Wang, D.; Tang, Y.; Xiao, Q.: How question type influences knowledge withholding in social Q&A community (2023) 0.03
    0.033326045 = product of:
      0.06665209 = sum of:
        0.06665209 = sum of:
          0.024085289 = weight(_text_:science in 1067) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.024085289 = score(doc=1067,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13793045 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052363027 = queryNorm
              0.17461908 = fieldWeight in 1067, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1067)
          0.042566802 = weight(_text_:22 in 1067) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042566802 = score(doc=1067,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1833664 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052363027 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1067, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1067)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 9.2023 13:51:47
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 74(2023) no.10, S.1170-1184
  18. Lercher, A.: Efficiency of scientific communication : a survey of world science (2010) 0.03
    0.03192856 = product of:
      0.06385712 = sum of:
        0.06385712 = sum of:
          0.028384786 = weight(_text_:science in 3997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.028384786 = score(doc=3997,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.13793045 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052363027 = queryNorm
              0.20579056 = fieldWeight in 3997, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3997)
          0.035472337 = weight(_text_:22 in 3997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.035472337 = score(doc=3997,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1833664 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052363027 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3997, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3997)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The aim of this study was to measure the efficiency of the system by which scientists worldwide communicate results to each other, providing one measure of the degree to which the system, including all media, functions well. A randomly selected and representative sample of 246 active research scientists worldwide was surveyed. The main measure was the reported rate of "late finds": scientific literature that would have been useful to scientists' projects if it had been found at the beginning of these projects. The main result was that 46% of the sample reported late finds (±6.25%, p0.05). Among respondents from European Union countries or other countries classified as "high income" by the World Bank, 42% reported late finds. Among respondents from low- and middle-income countries, 56% reported late finds. The 42% rate in high-income countries in 2009 can be compared with results of earlier surveys by Martyn (1964a, b, 1987). These earlier surveys found a rate of 22% late finds in 1963-1964 and a rate of 27% in 1985-1986. Respondents were also queried about search habits, but this study failed to support any explanations for this increase in the rate of late finds. This study also permits a crude estimate of the cost in time and money of the increase in late finds.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 61(2010) no.10, S.2049-2060
  19. Covert and overt : recollecting and connecting intelligence service and information science (2005) 0.03
    0.030501653 = product of:
      0.061003305 = sum of:
        0.061003305 = sum of:
          0.04093712 = weight(_text_:science in 69) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04093712 = score(doc=69,freq=52.0), product of:
              0.13793045 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052363027 = queryNorm
              0.29679537 = fieldWeight in 69, product of:
                7.2111025 = tf(freq=52.0), with freq of:
                  52.0 = termFreq=52.0
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=69)
          0.020066185 = weight(_text_:22 in 69) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.020066185 = score(doc=69,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.1833664 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052363027 = queryNorm
              0.109432176 = fieldWeight in 69, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=69)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Classification
    327.12 22
    Content
    Intelligence work and the information professions / Robert S. Taylor -- Spies of the airwaves / Norman Horrocks -- Intelligence work and information science : two men in a boat / David Batty -- The intelligence game : seeing is believing? / Robert Lee Chartrand -- Applications of information science to U.S. naval intelligence and narcotics intelligence, 1974-1992 / Emil Levine -- A life in the information trade / Charles T. Meadow -- Information management in MI5 before the age of the computer / Alistair Black and Rodney Brunt -- Some aspects of indexing in British intelligence, 1939-1945 / Rodney Brunt -- Intelligence agencies, librarians, and information scientists / Colin Burke -- Historical note on information science in wartime : pioneer documentation activities in World War II / Pamela Spence Richards -- Technology for open source government information and business intelligence / George L. Marling -- Knowledge transfer : information science shapes intelligencein the cold war era / Lee S. Strickland -- The information science and intelligence literature : an overview / Robert V. Williams -- Defining what information science is or should be : a survey and review of a half-century of published pronouncements / Ben-Ami Lipetz -- Wanted : a definition of "intelligence" / Michael Warner -- Evidence and inference in foreign intelligence / Maurice H. Hellner -- The zoo and the jungle : a comparison of the information practices of intelligence analysts and of scientists / Harold Wooster.
    DDC
    327.12 22
    Footnote
    Rez. in: JASIST 58(2007) no.2, S.303-305 (L. Hayden): "Part history and part call to action, Covert and Overt examines the relationship between the disciplines of intelligence service and information science. The book is significant in that it captures both the rich history of partnership between the fields, and because it demonstrates clearly the incomplete nature of our understanding of that partnership. In the post-9/11 world, such understanding is increasingly important, as we struggle with the problem of transforming information into intelligence and intelligence into effective policy. Information science has an important role to play in meeting these challenges, but the sometimesambiguous nature of the field combined with similar uncertainties over what constitutes intelligence, makes any attempt at definitive answers problematic. The book is a collection of works from different contributors, in the words of one editor "not so much a created work as an aggregation" (p. 1). More than just an edited collection of papers, the book draws from the personal experiences of several prominent information scientists who also served as intelligence professionals from World War II onward. The result is a book that feels very personal and at times impassioned. The contributors attempt to shed light on an often-closed community of practice, a discipline that depends simultaneously on access to information and on secrecy. Intelligence, like information science, is also a discipline that finds itself increasingly attracted to and dependent upon technology, and an underlying question of the book is where and how technology benefits intelligence (as opposed to only masking more fundamental problems of process and analysis and providing little or no actual value).
    The role of technology in both intelligence and information science is just one question explored in Covert and Overt, which takes on more fundamental issues as well. Even the ubiquitous "What is information?" debate is revisited. But the questions asked are always subordinate to the overarching theme of bringing concepts and techniques of intelligence and information science together and examining the results. The process and lifecycle of intelligence is explored and mapped to information science methods, primarily indexing and information retrieval. In more historical explorations undertaken by contributors, it becomes apparent that intelligence and information science have always been closely aligned, but that this alignment is not always perceived by those engaged in intelligence work. Interestingly, and probably not surprisingly, a general consensus seems to be that library and information science practitioners involved in intelligence were (and are) more capable of seeing the complementary nature of the techniques information science brings to intelligence services than many intelligence professionals, who often needed demonstrations of efficacy to be convinced. Structurally, the book is divided into four parts, moving from anecdotal accounts through to discussions of definition and theory. Part 1, "Information Science and Intelligence: Reminiscences and Reflections from World War II to Today" is comprised of the personal stories of information scientists who also served as intelligence professionals at various times during and since World War II, collected from special panel presentations at the 2001 and 2002 American Society for Information Science and Technology (ASIS&T) annual conferences. These contributors include former American and British servicemen and intelligence officers who all relate a common experience of dealing with information, documents, and other records in the pursuit of intelligence goals.
    This book is a successful and realistic examination of the current state of inquiry into the relationship between intelligence and information science, and does not flinch from the limits of this inquiry to date. The book can be viewed as a deliberate attempt to stimulate further interest in these studies, and serves as an excellent roadmap for future researchers (like this reviewer) who also have moved from intelligence service into information science. Many of the stories and studies in the book could easily provide fresh and vital avenues of research to new and veteran scholars. If there are limitations to the impact of the book, most must be viewed in the context of the lack of literature from which to draw. Contributions come from a variety of sources and although some new studies are included, for the most part, the chapters are not original to this publication. This results at times in a sense of the editors taking what they could get on the topic. The reader must determine whether this is viewed as a flaw or as reinforcement of the editors' conclusion that more research into the subject matter is important and necessary. It becomes a question of whether or not one wishes to answer the call. One interesting limitation, however, is the lack of a critical stance on the part of most of the contributors. The chapters tend to describe the relationship between intelligence and information science, but few question the nature of that relationship, the social construction of the two disciplines, or moral and ethical concerns associated with spying and information operations. In general, a reader is left with the impression that intelligence service is a good thing, and that information science as a discipline can both improve it as well as learn from it. Little insight is offered into the value and direction of intelligence in the 21 st century, or the impact that our technologies may have. One exception comes from Colin Burke who, in his chapter, "Intelligence Agencies, Librarians, and Information Scientists," touches on some of these issues with his claim that library and information science practitioners must "help bring the information advances from the intelligence communities to an industry that can be committed to distributing information at the lowest cost to the most people" (p. 112). Nevertheless, no serious questions regarding issues of control, power, or resistance are raised. Given recent debates over surveillance, privacy, and the erosion of civil liberties in the wake of 9-11, it would seem that this is an area of intelligence and information studies that also deserves attention. Covert and Overt is an excellent historical overview of the close relationship between intelligence and information science. The book is also intriguing and timely in its argument for further research and study into these areas. Despite the limitations of subject matter and the challenges that come with the disciplines that it explores, it is required reading for practitioners in either world who wish to gain a greater understanding of the operations of the other."
    LCSH
    Information science
    Subject
    Information science
  20. Harnack, A. von: ¬Die Auskunftserteilung als bibliothekarische Aufgabe (1940) 0.03
    0.02837787 = product of:
      0.05675574 = sum of:
        0.05675574 = product of:
          0.11351148 = sum of:
            0.11351148 = weight(_text_:22 in 5755) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11351148 = score(doc=5755,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1833664 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052363027 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 5755, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5755)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Zentralblatt für Bibliothekswesen. 57(1940), S.16-22

Languages

  • e 390
  • d 64
  • i 3
  • f 2
  • nl 2
  • dk 1
  • ru 1
  • s 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 394
  • m 42
  • s 25
  • x 6
  • r 4
  • el 3
  • b 2
  • i 1
  • u 1
  • More… Less…

Subjects

Classifications