-
Gödert, W.; Lepsky, K.: Information literacy and autonomy : a cognitive view (2023)
0.09
0.091726966 = product of:
0.18345393 = sum of:
0.18345393 = product of:
0.36690786 = sum of:
0.36690786 = weight(_text_:autonomy in 980) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.36690786 = score(doc=980,freq=4.0), product of:
0.37895662 = queryWeight, product of:
7.7456436 = idf(docFreq=51, maxDocs=44218)
0.048925128 = queryNorm
0.96820545 = fieldWeight in 980, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
7.7456436 = idf(docFreq=51, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=980)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Information literacy and autonomy have become key values for the image of man in a society that is increasingly shaped by digitalization and artificial intelligence. The purpose of this book is to describe abstraction, analogy, inference, plausibility and creativity as basic skills of cognitive information processing and prerequisites for autonomous informational action.
-
Rubel, A.; Castro, C.; Pham, A.: Algorithms and autonomy : the ethics of automated decision systems (2021)
0.08
0.081075944 = product of:
0.16215189 = sum of:
0.16215189 = product of:
0.32430378 = sum of:
0.32430378 = weight(_text_:autonomy in 671) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.32430378 = score(doc=671,freq=8.0), product of:
0.37895662 = queryWeight, product of:
7.7456436 = idf(docFreq=51, maxDocs=44218)
0.048925128 = queryNorm
0.8557808 = fieldWeight in 671, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
7.7456436 = idf(docFreq=51, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=671)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Algorithms influence every facet of modern life: criminal justice, education, housing, entertainment, elections, social media, news feeds, work... the list goes on. Delegating important decisions to machines, however, gives rise to deep moral concerns about responsibility, transparency, freedom, fairness, and democracy. Algorithms and Autonomy connects these concerns to the core human value of autonomy in the contexts of algorithmic teacher evaluation, risk assessment in criminal sentencing, predictive policing, background checks, news feeds, ride-sharing platforms, social media, and election interference. Using these case studies, the authors provide a better understanding of machine fairness and algorithmic transparency. They explain why interventions in algorithmic systems are necessary to ensure that algorithms are not used to control citizens' participation in politics and undercut democracy. This title is also available as Open Access on Cambridge Core
- Content
- Inhalt: Introduction -- Autonomy, agency, and responsibility -- What can agents reasonably endorse? -- What we informationally owe each other -- Freedom, agency, and information technology -- Epistemic paternalism and social media -- Agency laundering and information technologies -- Democratic obligations and technological threats to legitimacy -- Conclusions and caveats
-
Kang, M.: Motivational affordances and survival of new askers on social Q&A sites : the case of Stack Exchange network (2022)
0.05
0.048645567 = product of:
0.097291134 = sum of:
0.097291134 = product of:
0.19458227 = sum of:
0.19458227 = weight(_text_:autonomy in 447) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.19458227 = score(doc=447,freq=2.0), product of:
0.37895662 = queryWeight, product of:
7.7456436 = idf(docFreq=51, maxDocs=44218)
0.048925128 = queryNorm
0.51346844 = fieldWeight in 447, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.7456436 = idf(docFreq=51, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=447)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Social question-and-answer (Q&A) sites are platforms where users can freely ask, share, and rate knowledge. For the sustainable growth of social Q&A sites, maintaining askers is as critical as maintaining answerers. Based on motivational affordances theory and self-determination theory, this study explores the influence of the design elements of social Q&A sites (i.e., upvotes, downvotes, edits, user profile, and comments) on the survival of new askers. In addition, the moderating effect of having an alternative experience is examined. Online data on 25,000 new askers from the top five Q&A sites in the Technology category of the Stack Exchange network are analyzed using logistic regression. The results show that the competency- and autonomy-related design features of social Q&A sites motivate new askers to continue participating. Surprisingly, having an alternative experience shows a negative moderating effect, implying that alternative experiences increase switching costs in the Stack Exchange network. This study provides valuable insights for administrators of social Q&A sites as well as academics.
-
Xia, H.: What scholars and IRBs talk when they talk about the Belmont principles in crowd work-based research (2023)
0.05
0.048645567 = product of:
0.097291134 = sum of:
0.097291134 = product of:
0.19458227 = sum of:
0.19458227 = weight(_text_:autonomy in 843) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.19458227 = score(doc=843,freq=2.0), product of:
0.37895662 = queryWeight, product of:
7.7456436 = idf(docFreq=51, maxDocs=44218)
0.048925128 = queryNorm
0.51346844 = fieldWeight in 843, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.7456436 = idf(docFreq=51, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=843)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- How scholars and IRBs perceive and apply the Belmont principles in crowd work-based research was an open and largely neglected question. As crowd work becomes increasingly popular for scholars to implement research and collect data, such negligence, signaling a lack of attention to the ethical issues in crowd work-based research more broadly, seemed alarming. To fill this gap, we conducted a qualitative study with 32 scholars and IRB directors/analysts in the United States to inquire into their perceptions and applications of the Belmont principles in crowd work-based research. We found two dilemmas in applying the Belmont principles in crowd work-based research, namely the dilemma between the dehumanization and expected autonomy of crowd workers, and the dilemma between the monetary incentive/reputationall risks and the conventional notion of research benefits/risks. We also compared the scholars' and IRBs' ethical perspectives and proposed our research implications for future work.
-
Bossaller, J.; Million, A.J.: ¬The research data life cycle, legacy data, and dilemmas in research data management (2023)
0.05
0.048645567 = product of:
0.097291134 = sum of:
0.097291134 = product of:
0.19458227 = sum of:
0.19458227 = weight(_text_:autonomy in 966) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.19458227 = score(doc=966,freq=2.0), product of:
0.37895662 = queryWeight, product of:
7.7456436 = idf(docFreq=51, maxDocs=44218)
0.048925128 = queryNorm
0.51346844 = fieldWeight in 966, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.7456436 = idf(docFreq=51, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=966)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This paper presents findings from an interview study of research data managers in academic data archives. Our study examined policies and professional autonomy with a focus on dilemmas encountered in everyday work by data managers. We found that dilemmas arose at every stage of the research data lifecycle, and legacy data presents particularly vexing challenges. The iFields' emphasis on knowledge organization and representation provides insight into how data, used by scientists, are used to create knowledge. The iFields' disciplinary emphasis also encompasses the sociotechnical complexity of dilemmas that we found arise in research data management. Therefore, we posit that iSchools are positioned to contribute to data science education by teaching about ethics and infrastructure used to collect, organize, and disseminate data through problem-based learning.
-
Mann, M.; Mitchell, P.; Foth, M.; Anastasiu, I.: #BlockSidewalk to Barcelona : technological sovereignty and the social license to operate smart cities (2020)
0.04
0.040537972 = product of:
0.081075944 = sum of:
0.081075944 = product of:
0.16215189 = sum of:
0.16215189 = weight(_text_:autonomy in 5935) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16215189 = score(doc=5935,freq=2.0), product of:
0.37895662 = queryWeight, product of:
7.7456436 = idf(docFreq=51, maxDocs=44218)
0.048925128 = queryNorm
0.4278904 = fieldWeight in 5935, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.7456436 = idf(docFreq=51, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5935)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This article explores technological sovereignty as a way to respond to anxieties of control in digital urban contexts, and argues that this may promise a more meaningful social license to operate smart cities. First, we present an overview of smart city developments with a critical focus on corporatization and platform urbanism. We critique Alphabet's Sidewalk Labs development in Toronto, which faces public backlash from the #BlockSidewalk campaign in response to concerns over not just privacy, but also lack of community consultation, the prospect of the city losing its civic ability to self-govern, and its repossession of public land and infrastructure. Second, we explore what a more responsible smart city could look like, underpinned by technological sovereignty, which is a way to use technologies to promote individual and collective autonomy and empowerment via ownership, control, and self-governance of data and technologies. To this end, we juxtapose the Sidewalk Labs development in Toronto with the Barcelona Digital City plan. We illustrate the merits (and limits) of technological sovereignty moving toward a fairer and more equitable digital society.
-
Jones, K.M.L.; Rubel, A.; LeClere, E.: ¬A matter of trust : higher education institutions as information fiduciaries in an age of educational data mining and learning analytics (2020)
0.04
0.040537972 = product of:
0.081075944 = sum of:
0.081075944 = product of:
0.16215189 = sum of:
0.16215189 = weight(_text_:autonomy in 5968) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16215189 = score(doc=5968,freq=2.0), product of:
0.37895662 = queryWeight, product of:
7.7456436 = idf(docFreq=51, maxDocs=44218)
0.048925128 = queryNorm
0.4278904 = fieldWeight in 5968, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.7456436 = idf(docFreq=51, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5968)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Higher education institutions are mining and analyzing student data to effect educational, political, and managerial outcomes. Done under the banner of "learning analytics," this work can-and often does-surface sensitive data and information about, inter alia, a student's demographics, academic performance, offline and online movements, physical fitness, mental wellbeing, and social network. With these data, institutions and third parties are able to describe student life, predict future behaviors, and intervene to address academic or other barriers to student success (however defined). Learning analytics, consequently, raise serious issues concerning student privacy, autonomy, and the appropriate flow of student data. We argue that issues around privacy lead to valid questions about the degree to which students should trust their institution to use learning analytics data and other artifacts (algorithms, predictive scores) with their interests in mind. We argue that higher education institutions are paradigms of information fiduciaries. As such, colleges and universities have a special responsibility to their students. In this article, we use the information fiduciary concept to analyze cases when learning analytics violate an institution's responsibility to its students.
-
Noever, D.; Ciolino, M.: ¬The Turing deception (2022)
0.04
0.038853034 = product of:
0.07770607 = sum of:
0.07770607 = product of:
0.2331182 = sum of:
0.2331182 = weight(_text_:3a in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.2331182 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
0.41478777 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.048925128 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- https%3A%2F%2Farxiv.org%2Fabs%2F2212.06721&usg=AOvVaw3i_9pZm9y_dQWoHi6uv0EN
-
Dietz, K.: en.wikipedia.org > 6 Mio. Artikel (2020)
0.03
0.032377534 = product of:
0.06475507 = sum of:
0.06475507 = product of:
0.19426519 = sum of:
0.19426519 = weight(_text_:3a in 5669) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.19426519 = score(doc=5669,freq=2.0), product of:
0.41478777 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.048925128 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5669, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5669)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- "Die Englischsprachige Wikipedia verfügt jetzt über mehr als 6 Millionen Artikel. An zweiter Stelle kommt die deutschsprachige Wikipedia mit 2.3 Millionen Artikeln, an dritter Stelle steht die französischsprachige Wikipedia mit 2.1 Millionen Artikeln (via Researchbuzz: Firehose <https://rbfirehose.com/2020/01/24/techcrunch-wikipedia-now-has-more-than-6-million-articles-in-english/> und Techcrunch <https://techcrunch.com/2020/01/23/wikipedia-english-six-million-articles/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Techcrunch+%28TechCrunch%29&guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly9yYmZpcmVob3NlLmNvbS8yMDIwLzAxLzI0L3RlY2hjcnVuY2gtd2lraXBlZGlhLW5vdy1oYXMtbW9yZS10aGFuLTYtbWlsbGlvbi1hcnRpY2xlcy1pbi1lbmdsaXNoLw&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAK0zHfjdDZ_spFZBF_z-zDjtL5iWvuKDumFTzm4HvQzkUfE2pLXQzGS6FGB_y-VISdMEsUSvkNsg2U_NWQ4lwWSvOo3jvXo1I3GtgHpP8exukVxYAnn5mJspqX50VHIWFADHhs5AerkRn3hMRtf_R3F1qmEbo8EROZXp328HMC-o>). 250120 via digithek ch = #fineBlog s.a.: Angesichts der Veröffentlichung des 6-millionsten Artikels vergangene Woche in der englischsprachigen Wikipedia hat die Community-Zeitungsseite "Wikipedia Signpost" ein Moratorium bei der Veröffentlichung von Unternehmensartikeln gefordert. Das sei kein Vorwurf gegen die Wikimedia Foundation, aber die derzeitigen Maßnahmen, um die Enzyklopädie gegen missbräuchliches undeklariertes Paid Editing zu schützen, funktionierten ganz klar nicht. *"Da die ehrenamtlichen Autoren derzeit von Werbung in Gestalt von Wikipedia-Artikeln überwältigt werden, und da die WMF nicht in der Lage zu sein scheint, dem irgendetwas entgegenzusetzen, wäre der einzige gangbare Weg für die Autoren, fürs erste die Neuanlage von Artikeln über Unternehmen zu untersagen"*, schreibt der Benutzer Smallbones in seinem Editorial <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2020-01-27/From_the_editor> zur heutigen Ausgabe."
-
Gabler, S.: Vergabe von DDC-Sachgruppen mittels eines Schlagwort-Thesaurus (2021)
0.03
0.032377534 = product of:
0.06475507 = sum of:
0.06475507 = product of:
0.19426519 = sum of:
0.19426519 = weight(_text_:3a in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.19426519 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
0.41478777 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.048925128 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Master thesis Master of Science (Library and Information Studies) (MSc), Universität Wien. Advisor: Christoph Steiner. Vgl.: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/371680244_Vergabe_von_DDC-Sachgruppen_mittels_eines_Schlagwort-Thesaurus. DOI: 10.25365/thesis.70030. Vgl. dazu die Präsentation unter: https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=0CAIQw7AJahcKEwjwoZzzytz_AhUAAAAAHQAAAAAQAg&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwiki.dnb.de%2Fdownload%2Fattachments%2F252121510%2FDA3%2520Workshop-Gabler.pdf%3Fversion%3D1%26modificationDate%3D1671093170000%26api%3Dv2&psig=AOvVaw0szwENK1or3HevgvIDOfjx&ust=1687719410889597&opi=89978449.
-
¬Der Student aus dem Computer (2023)
0.02
0.023200378 = product of:
0.046400756 = sum of:
0.046400756 = product of:
0.09280151 = sum of:
0.09280151 = weight(_text_:22 in 1079) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09280151 = score(doc=1079,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17132746 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.048925128 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1079, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1079)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 27. 1.2023 16:22:55
-
Jaeger, L.: Wissenschaftler versus Wissenschaft (2020)
0.02
0.019886037 = product of:
0.039772075 = sum of:
0.039772075 = product of:
0.07954415 = sum of:
0.07954415 = weight(_text_:22 in 4156) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07954415 = score(doc=4156,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17132746 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.048925128 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4156, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4156)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 2. 3.2020 14:08:22
-
Ibrahim, G.M.; Taylor, M.: Krebszellen manipulieren Neurone : Gliome (2023)
0.02
0.019886037 = product of:
0.039772075 = sum of:
0.039772075 = product of:
0.07954415 = sum of:
0.07954415 = weight(_text_:22 in 1203) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07954415 = score(doc=1203,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17132746 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.048925128 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1203, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1203)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Spektrum der Wissenschaft. 2023, H.10, S.22-24
-
Koch, C.: Was ist Bewusstsein? (2020)
0.02
0.016571699 = product of:
0.033143397 = sum of:
0.033143397 = product of:
0.066286795 = sum of:
0.066286795 = weight(_text_:22 in 5723) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.066286795 = score(doc=5723,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17132746 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.048925128 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5723, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5723)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 17. 1.2020 22:15:11
-
Wagner, E.: Über Impfstoffe zur digitalen Identität? (2020)
0.02
0.016571699 = product of:
0.033143397 = sum of:
0.033143397 = product of:
0.066286795 = sum of:
0.066286795 = weight(_text_:22 in 5846) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.066286795 = score(doc=5846,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17132746 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.048925128 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5846, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5846)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 4. 5.2020 17:22:40
-
Engel, B.: Corona-Gesundheitszertifikat als Exitstrategie (2020)
0.02
0.016571699 = product of:
0.033143397 = sum of:
0.033143397 = product of:
0.066286795 = sum of:
0.066286795 = weight(_text_:22 in 5906) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.066286795 = score(doc=5906,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17132746 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.048925128 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5906, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5906)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 4. 5.2020 17:22:28
-
Arndt, O.: Totale Telematik (2020)
0.02
0.016571699 = product of:
0.033143397 = sum of:
0.033143397 = product of:
0.066286795 = sum of:
0.066286795 = weight(_text_:22 in 5907) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.066286795 = score(doc=5907,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17132746 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.048925128 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5907, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5907)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 6.2020 19:11:24
-
Arndt, O.: Erosion der bürgerlichen Freiheiten (2020)
0.02
0.016571699 = product of:
0.033143397 = sum of:
0.033143397 = product of:
0.066286795 = sum of:
0.066286795 = weight(_text_:22 in 82) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.066286795 = score(doc=82,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17132746 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.048925128 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 82, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=82)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 6.2020 19:16:24
-
Baecker, D.: ¬Der Frosch, die Fliege und der Mensch : zum Tod von Humberto Maturana (2021)
0.02
0.016571699 = product of:
0.033143397 = sum of:
0.033143397 = product of:
0.066286795 = sum of:
0.066286795 = weight(_text_:22 in 236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.066286795 = score(doc=236,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17132746 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.048925128 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 236, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=236)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 7. 5.2021 22:10:24
-
Eyert, F.: Mathematische Wissenschaftskommunikation in der digitalen Gesellschaft (2023)
0.02
0.016571699 = product of:
0.033143397 = sum of:
0.033143397 = product of:
0.066286795 = sum of:
0.066286795 = weight(_text_:22 in 1001) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.066286795 = score(doc=1001,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17132746 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.048925128 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1001, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1001)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Mitteilungen der Deutschen Mathematiker-Vereinigung. 2023, H.1, S.22-25
