-
Ross, J.: ¬The impact of technology on indexing (2000)
0.03
0.027101975 = product of:
0.05420395 = sum of:
0.05420395 = product of:
0.1084079 = sum of:
0.1084079 = weight(_text_:22 in 263) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1084079 = score(doc=263,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17512208 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05000874 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 263, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=263)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.25-26
-
Walker, A.: Indexing commonplace books : John Locke's method (2001)
0.03
0.027101975 = product of:
0.05420395 = sum of:
0.05420395 = product of:
0.1084079 = sum of:
0.1084079 = weight(_text_:22 in 13) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1084079 = score(doc=13,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17512208 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05000874 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 13, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=13)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.14-18
-
Crystal, D.: Quote index unquote (2000)
0.03
0.027101975 = product of:
0.05420395 = sum of:
0.05420395 = product of:
0.1084079 = sum of:
0.1084079 = weight(_text_:22 in 487) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1084079 = score(doc=487,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17512208 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05000874 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 487, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=487)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.14-20
-
Matthews, D.: Indexing published letters (2001)
0.03
0.027101975 = product of:
0.05420395 = sum of:
0.05420395 = product of:
0.1084079 = sum of:
0.1084079 = weight(_text_:22 in 4160) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1084079 = score(doc=4160,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17512208 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05000874 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4160, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4160)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.135-141
-
Gratch, B.; Settel, B.; Atherton, P.: Characteristics of book indexes for subject retrieval in the humanities and social sciences (1978)
0.02
0.023714228 = product of:
0.047428455 = sum of:
0.047428455 = product of:
0.09485691 = sum of:
0.09485691 = weight(_text_:22 in 1061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09485691 = score(doc=1061,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17512208 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05000874 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1061, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1061)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Indexer. 11(1978), S.14-22
-
Davis, M.: Building a global legal index : a work in progress (2001)
0.02
0.023714228 = product of:
0.047428455 = sum of:
0.047428455 = product of:
0.09485691 = sum of:
0.09485691 = weight(_text_:22 in 6443) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09485691 = score(doc=6443,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17512208 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05000874 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6443, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6443)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.123-127
-
Browne, G.: ¬The definite article : acknowledging The in index entries (2001)
0.02
0.023714228 = product of:
0.047428455 = sum of:
0.047428455 = product of:
0.09485691 = sum of:
0.09485691 = weight(_text_:22 in 12) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09485691 = score(doc=12,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17512208 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05000874 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 12, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=12)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.119-122
-
Weinberg, B.H.: Book indexes in France : medieval specimens and modern practices (2000)
0.02
0.023714228 = product of:
0.047428455 = sum of:
0.047428455 = product of:
0.09485691 = sum of:
0.09485691 = weight(_text_:22 in 486) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09485691 = score(doc=486,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17512208 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05000874 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 486, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=486)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.2-13
-
Mauer, P.: Embedded indexing : pros and cons for the indexer (2000)
0.02
0.023714228 = product of:
0.047428455 = sum of:
0.047428455 = product of:
0.09485691 = sum of:
0.09485691 = weight(_text_:22 in 488) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09485691 = score(doc=488,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17512208 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05000874 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 488, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=488)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.27-28
-
Anderson, C.R.: Indexing with a computer : past and present (2000)
0.02
0.023714228 = product of:
0.047428455 = sum of:
0.047428455 = product of:
0.09485691 = sum of:
0.09485691 = weight(_text_:22 in 489) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09485691 = score(doc=489,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17512208 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05000874 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 489, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=489)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.23-24
-
Lee, D.: Judging indexes : the criteria for a good index (2001)
0.02
0.023714228 = product of:
0.047428455 = sum of:
0.047428455 = product of:
0.09485691 = sum of:
0.09485691 = weight(_text_:22 in 4162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09485691 = score(doc=4162,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17512208 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05000874 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4162, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4162)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2001) no.4, S.191-194
-
Weinberg, B.H.: Predecessors of scientific indexing structures in the domain of religion (2001)
0.02
0.023714228 = product of:
0.047428455 = sum of:
0.047428455 = product of:
0.09485691 = sum of:
0.09485691 = weight(_text_:22 in 4172) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09485691 = score(doc=4172,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17512208 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05000874 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4172, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4172)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2001) no.4, S.178-180
-
Weinberg, B.H.: Index structures in early Hebrew Biblical word lists : preludes to the first Latin concordances (2004)
0.02
0.023714228 = product of:
0.047428455 = sum of:
0.047428455 = product of:
0.09485691 = sum of:
0.09485691 = weight(_text_:22 in 4180) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09485691 = score(doc=4180,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17512208 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05000874 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4180, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4180)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 17.10.2005 13:54:22
-
Luhn, H.P.: Keyword-in-context index for technical literature (1985)
0.02
0.020347003 = product of:
0.040694006 = sum of:
0.040694006 = product of:
0.08138801 = sum of:
0.08138801 = weight(_text_:spaces in 3638) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08138801 = score(doc=3638,freq=2.0), product of:
0.32442674 = queryWeight, product of:
6.487401 = idf(docFreq=182, maxDocs=44218)
0.05000874 = queryNorm
0.25086716 = fieldWeight in 3638, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.487401 = idf(docFreq=182, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3638)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- In the optimistic 1960s the potential of the computer seemed limitless. The realization of this potential in the area of information retrieval and dissemination owes much to the creative mind of Hans Peter Luhn. A pioneer of information science, he had a mind and an imagination that could transcend the state of the art. Luhn was born in Germany, where he studied technology, physics, and accounting. He came to the United States in 1924 and in 1941, at the age of 45, he joined IBM. In the course of his twenty-year tenure at IBM, he was issued over eighty patents; at one time he held more than any other IBM employee. Luhn is credited with originating KWIC indexes, computer selective dissemination systems (SDI), computer coding schemes, and statistical techniques for automatic indexing and abstracting. Also attributed to him is the first modern use of the word "thesaurus." The selection that follows modestly presents the idea of a Keyword in Context (KWIC) index. This is the idea of automatically identifying significant or "key" words and highlighting them in context. The context in question was normally a title. Though title term or catchword indexing had been practiced for over one hundred years, the implementation of the idea in mechanized systems in the 1960s was not trivial. It required programming the computer to recognize word boundaries and then developing a means for automatically differentiating significant from nonsignificant words. Spaces were used to demarcate word boundaries and a stop list, consisting of articles, conjunctions, prepositions, auxiliary verbs, some adjectives, and some very common words, was used to differentiate significant from nonsignificant words. A difficulty with any automatic indexing limited to extracting single words from texts is the semantic indeterminancy of the extracted character strings. To disambiguate these, Luhn adopted the concordance idea, proposing to display them in the context of their titles. Specifying the meaning of an index term by couching it in "context," anticipated the later development of string index languages such as PRECIS (PREserved Context Index System). Although the selection that follows is quite short, it presents, in addition to the idea of KWIC, what at the time were two innovative ideas. One is the distinction between the dissemination and the retrieval of information, in regard to which Luhn makes a point sometimes overlooked by modern critics of KWIC. This is that different purposes require different kinds of indexes; an index that is used to disseminate information for current awareness need not be as "perfect" as one used for retrospective information retrieval. The need to alert researchers to current information quickly, and the somewhat transitory character of this information, make KWIC, albeit quick and dirty, a costeffective alternative for dissemination indexes. The second harbinger idea is a method of uniquely identifying documents for retrieval using an identification code comprising the initial characters from a document's author, title, and - interestingly - year of publication. Luhn's mind was fertile indeed and he is aptly called a pioneer of information science.
-
Bell, H.K.: Indexing biographies, and other stories of human lives (1992)
0.02
0.02032648 = product of:
0.04065296 = sum of:
0.04065296 = product of:
0.08130592 = sum of:
0.08130592 = weight(_text_:22 in 5396) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08130592 = score(doc=5396,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17512208 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05000874 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 5396, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5396)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Knowledge organization 22(1995) no.1, S.46-47 (R. Fugmann)
-
Lathrop, L.: ¬An indexer's guide to the Internet (1999)
0.02
0.02032648 = product of:
0.04065296 = sum of:
0.04065296 = product of:
0.08130592 = sum of:
0.08130592 = weight(_text_:22 in 485) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08130592 = score(doc=485,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17512208 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05000874 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 485, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=485)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Indexer 22(2000) no.1, S.51 (R. Davis)
-
Weinberg, B.H.: ¬The body of a reference work in relation to its index : an analysis of wordsmanship (1996)
0.02
0.01916399 = product of:
0.03832798 = sum of:
0.03832798 = product of:
0.07665596 = sum of:
0.07665596 = weight(_text_:22 in 6940) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07665596 = score(doc=6940,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17512208 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05000874 = queryNorm
0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 6940, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6940)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 8. 3.1997 20:22:25
- Source
- Indexer. 20(1996) no.1, S.18-22
-
Olason, S.C.: Let's get usable! : Usability studies for indexes (2000)
0.02
0.01916399 = product of:
0.03832798 = sum of:
0.03832798 = product of:
0.07665596 = sum of:
0.07665596 = weight(_text_:22 in 882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07665596 = score(doc=882,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17512208 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05000874 = queryNorm
0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 882, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=882)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Vgl.: http://www.theindexer.org/files/22-2-olason.pdf.
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.2, S.91-95
-
Bell, H.K.: History of societies of indexing : part VII: 1992-95 (2000)
0.02
0.016938735 = product of:
0.03387747 = sum of:
0.03387747 = product of:
0.06775494 = sum of:
0.06775494 = weight(_text_:22 in 113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06775494 = score(doc=113,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17512208 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05000874 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 113, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=113)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.2, S.81-83
-
Crawley, J.; Adams, C.: InfoAccess Project : comparing print, CD-ROM, and inhouse indexes (1991)
0.01
0.0135509875 = product of:
0.027101975 = sum of:
0.027101975 = product of:
0.05420395 = sum of:
0.05420395 = weight(_text_:22 in 4824) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05420395 = score(doc=4824,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17512208 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05000874 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4824, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4824)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Describes the InfoAccess Project at the Univ of Saskatchewan Libraries which compared searching of manual and automated indexes by 22 undergraduate psychology students to determine their searching preferences by ranking 'Psychological abstracts' in 3 formats: print, CD-ROM and a locally mounted tape service called InfoAccess. Their satisfaction regarding the physical environment, equipment, and instructional aids was also recorded. Users preferred to search with CD-ROM, but found InfoAccess to be an acceptable alternative
