Search (213 results, page 1 of 11)

  • × theme_ss:"Wissensrepräsentation"
  1. John, M.: Semantische Technologien in der betrieblichen Anwendung : Ergebnisse einer Anwenderstudie (2006) 0.06
    0.058237173 = product of:
      0.17471151 = sum of:
        0.1372013 = weight(_text_:john in 3898) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1372013 = score(doc=3898,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24518675 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.330911 = idf(docFreq=213, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03872851 = queryNorm
            0.5595788 = fieldWeight in 3898, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.330911 = idf(docFreq=213, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3898)
        0.037510216 = weight(_text_:r in 3898) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037510216 = score(doc=3898,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12820137 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03872851 = queryNorm
            0.29258826 = fieldWeight in 3898, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3898)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Type
    r
  2. Jansen, L.: Four rules for classifying social entities (2014) 0.03
    0.030403543 = product of:
      0.091210626 = sum of:
        0.06776674 = product of:
          0.13553348 = sum of:
            0.13553348 = weight(_text_:searle in 3409) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.13553348 = score(doc=3409,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.30824864 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.9592175 = idf(docFreq=41, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03872851 = queryNorm
                0.4396888 = fieldWeight in 3409, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  7.9592175 = idf(docFreq=41, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3409)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.023443883 = weight(_text_:r in 3409) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023443883 = score(doc=3409,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12820137 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03872851 = queryNorm
            0.18286766 = fieldWeight in 3409, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3409)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Many top-level ontologies like Basic Formal Ontology (BFO) have been developed as a framework for ontologies in the natural sciences. The aim of the present essay is to extend the account of BFO to a very special layer of reality, the world of social entities. While natural entities like bacteria, thunderstorms or temperatures exist independently from human action and thought, social entities like countries, hospitals or money come into being only through human collective intentions and collective actions. Recently, the regional ontology of the social world has attracted considerable research interest in philosophy - witness, e.g., the pioneering work by Gilbert, Tuomela and Searle. There is a considerable class of phenomena that require the participation of more than one human agent: nobody can tango alone, play tennis against oneself, or set up a parliamentary democracy for oneself. Through cooperation and coordination of their wills and actions, agents can act together - they can perform social actions and group actions. An important kind of social action is the establishment of an institution (e.g. a hospital, a research agency or a marriage) through mutual promise or (social) contract. Another important kind of social action is the imposition of a social status on certain entities. For example, a society can impose the status of being a 20 Euro note on certain pieces of paper or the status of being an approved medication to a certain chemical substance.
    Source
    Philosophy, computing and information science. Eds.: R. Hagengruber u. U.V. Riss
  3. Drewer, P.; Massion, F; Pulitano, D: Was haben Wissensmodellierung, Wissensstrukturierung, künstliche Intelligenz und Terminologie miteinander zu tun? (2017) 0.02
    0.024374552 = product of:
      0.073123656 = sum of:
        0.046887767 = weight(_text_:r in 5576) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.046887767 = score(doc=5576,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12820137 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03872851 = queryNorm
            0.36573532 = fieldWeight in 5576, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5576)
        0.026235892 = product of:
          0.052471783 = sum of:
            0.052471783 = weight(_text_:22 in 5576) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.052471783 = score(doc=5576,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13562064 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03872851 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5576, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5576)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Date
    13.12.2017 14:17:22
    Type
    r
  4. Zeng, Q.; Yu, M.; Yu, W.; Xiong, J.; Shi, Y.; Jiang, M.: Faceted hierarchy : a new graph type to organize scientific concepts and a construction method (2019) 0.02
    0.023654789 = product of:
      0.070964366 = sum of:
        0.06151114 = product of:
          0.18453342 = sum of:
            0.18453342 = weight(_text_:3a in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.18453342 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.32834074 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03872851 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.00945323 = product of:
          0.01890646 = sum of:
            0.01890646 = weight(_text_:4 in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.01890646 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.105097495 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03872851 = queryNorm
                0.17989448 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Faclanthology.org%2FD19-5317.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0ZZFyq5wWTtNTvNkrvjlGA.
    Source
    Graph-Based Methods for Natural Language Processing - proceedings of the Thirteenth Workshop (TextGraphs-13): November 4, 2019, Hong Kong : EMNLP-IJCNLP 2019. Ed.: Dmitry Ustalov
  5. Bringsjord, S.; Clark, M.; Taylor, J.: Sophisticated knowledge representation and reasoning requires philosophy (2014) 0.02
    0.02184669 = product of:
      0.06554007 = sum of:
        0.05242212 = weight(_text_:r in 3403) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05242212 = score(doc=3403,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.12820137 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03872851 = queryNorm
            0.40890455 = fieldWeight in 3403, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3403)
        0.013117946 = product of:
          0.026235892 = sum of:
            0.026235892 = weight(_text_:22 in 3403) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.026235892 = score(doc=3403,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13562064 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03872851 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3403, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3403)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    What is knowledge representation and reasoning (KR&R)? Alas, a thorough account would require a book, or at least a dedicated, full-length paper, but here we shall have to make do with something simpler. Since most readers are likely to have an intuitive grasp of the essence of KR&R, our simple account should suffice. The interesting thing is that this simple account itself makes reference to some of the foundational distinctions in the field of philosophy. These distinctions also play a central role in artificial intelligence (AI) and computer science. To begin with, the first distinction in KR&R is that we identify knowledge with knowledge that such-and-such holds (possibly to a degree), rather than knowing how. If you ask an expert tennis player how he manages to serve a ball at 130 miles per hour on his first serve, and then serve a safer, topspin serve on his second should the first be out, you may well receive a confession that, if truth be told, this athlete can't really tell you. He just does it; he does something he has been doing since his youth. Yet, there is no denying that he knows how to serve. In contrast, the knowledge in KR&R must be expressible in declarative statements. For example, our tennis player knows that if his first serve lands outside the service box, it's not in play. He thus knows a proposition, conditional in form.
    Date
    9. 2.2017 19:22:14
    Source
    Philosophy, computing and information science. Eds.: R. Hagengruber u. U.V. Riss
  6. Eito-Brun, R.: Ontologies and the exchange of technical information : building a knowledge repository based on ECSS standards (2014) 0.02
    0.017449377 = product of:
      0.05234813 = sum of:
        0.018755108 = weight(_text_:r in 1436) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018755108 = score(doc=1436,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12820137 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03872851 = queryNorm
            0.14629413 = fieldWeight in 1436, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1436)
        0.03359302 = sum of:
          0.012604306 = weight(_text_:4 in 1436) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.012604306 = score(doc=1436,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.105097495 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03872851 = queryNorm
              0.11992966 = fieldWeight in 1436, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1436)
          0.020988714 = weight(_text_:22 in 1436) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.020988714 = score(doc=1436,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13562064 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03872851 = queryNorm
              0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1436, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1436)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Date
    4. 9.2014 14:11:40
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  7. Tzitzikas, Y.; Spyratos, N.; Constantopoulos, P.; Analyti, A.: Extended faceted ontologies (2002) 0.02
    0.017150164 = product of:
      0.102900974 = sum of:
        0.102900974 = weight(_text_:john in 2280) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.102900974 = score(doc=2280,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24518675 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.330911 = idf(docFreq=213, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03872851 = queryNorm
            0.41968408 = fieldWeight in 2280, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.330911 = idf(docFreq=213, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2280)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Advanced Information Systems Engineering: Proceedings of the 14th Internarional Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering (CAiSE 2002), Toronto, Canada, May 27-31. Eds.: Anne Banks Pidduck, John Mylopoulos, Carson C. Woo, M. Tamer Özsu
  8. Stuart, D.: Practical ontologies for information professionals (2016) 0.02
    0.0170724 = product of:
      0.0512172 = sum of:
        0.043418683 = weight(_text_:r in 5152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.043418683 = score(doc=5152,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.12820137 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03872851 = queryNorm
            0.33867568 = fieldWeight in 5152, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=5152)
        0.0077985167 = product of:
          0.015597033 = sum of:
            0.015597033 = weight(_text_:4 in 5152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.015597033 = score(doc=5152,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.105097495 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03872851 = queryNorm
                0.14840537 = fieldWeight in 5152, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=5152)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Content
    C H A P T E R 1 What is an ontology?; Introduction; The data deluge and information overload; Defining terms; Knowledge organization systems and ontologies; Ontologies, metadata and linked data; What can an ontology do?; Ontologies and information professionals; Alternatives to ontologies; The aims of this book; The structure of this book; C H A P T E R 2 Ontologies and the semantic web; Introduction; The semantic web and linked data; Resource Description Framework (RDF); Classes, subclasses and properties; The semantic web stack; Embedded RDF; Alternative semantic visionsLibraries and the semantic web; Other cultural heritage institutions and the semantic web; Other organizations and the semantic web; Conclusion; C H A P T E R 3 Existing ontologies; Introduction; Ontology documentation; Ontologies for representing ontologies; Ontologies for libraries; Upper ontologies; Cultural heritage data models; Ontologies for the web; Conclusion; C H A P T E R 4 Adopting ontologies; Introduction; Reusing ontologies: application profiles and data models; Identifying ontologies; The ideal ontology discovery tool; Selection criteria; Conclusion C H A P T E R 5 Building ontologiesIntroduction; Approaches to building an ontology; The twelve steps; Ontology development example: Bibliometric Metrics Ontology element set; Conclusion; C H A P T E R 6 Interrogating ontologies; Introduction; Interrogating ontologies for reuse; Interrogating a knowledge base; Understanding ontology use; Conclusion; C H A P T E R 7 The future of ontologies and the information professional; Introduction; The future of ontologies for knowledge discovery; The future role of library and information professionals; The practical development of ontologies
    Isbn
    978-1-78330-062-4
  9. Falkenberg, E.; Hesse, W.; Lindgreen, P.; Nilsson, B.E.; Oei, J.L.H.; Rolland, C.; Stamper, R.K.; Van Assche, F.J.M.; Verrijn-Stuart, A.A.; Voss, K.: FRISCO - A framework of information system concepts : the FRISCO report; final draft (1996) 0.02
    0.016704842 = product of:
      0.050114524 = sum of:
        0.037510216 = weight(_text_:r in 3056) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037510216 = score(doc=3056,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12820137 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03872851 = queryNorm
            0.29258826 = fieldWeight in 3056, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3056)
        0.012604306 = product of:
          0.025208613 = sum of:
            0.025208613 = weight(_text_:4 in 3056) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025208613 = score(doc=3056,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.105097495 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03872851 = queryNorm
                0.23985931 = fieldWeight in 3056, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3056)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Isbn
    3-901882-01-4
    Type
    r
  10. Studer, R.; Studer, H.-P.; Studer, A.: Semantisches Knowledge Retrieval (2001) 0.02
    0.01641294 = product of:
      0.04923882 = sum of:
        0.03978559 = weight(_text_:r in 4322) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03978559 = score(doc=4322,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.12820137 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03872851 = queryNorm
            0.3103367 = fieldWeight in 4322, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4322)
        0.00945323 = product of:
          0.01890646 = sum of:
            0.01890646 = weight(_text_:4 in 4322) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.01890646 = score(doc=4322,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.105097495 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03872851 = queryNorm
                0.17989448 = fieldWeight in 4322, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4322)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Content
    Inhalt: 1. Einführung - 2. Wissensmanagement - 3. Information Retrieval - 3.1. Methoden und Techniken - 3.2. Information Retrieval in der Anwendung - 4. Semantische Ansätze - 4.1. Wissen modellieren - Ontologie - 4.2. Neues Wissen inferieren - 5. Knowledge Retrieval in der Anwendung - 6. Zukunftsaussichten - 7. Fazit
    Type
    r
  11. Gayathri, R.; Uma, V.: Ontology based knowledge representation technique, domain modeling languages and planners for robotic path planning : a survey (2018) 0.02
    0.01641294 = product of:
      0.04923882 = sum of:
        0.03978559 = weight(_text_:r in 5605) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03978559 = score(doc=5605,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.12820137 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03872851 = queryNorm
            0.3103367 = fieldWeight in 5605, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5605)
        0.00945323 = product of:
          0.01890646 = sum of:
            0.01890646 = weight(_text_:4 in 5605) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.01890646 = score(doc=5605,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.105097495 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03872851 = queryNorm
                0.17989448 = fieldWeight in 5605, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5605)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR & R) has become one of the promising fields of Artificial Intelligence. KR is dedicated towards representing information about the domain that can be utilized in path planning. Ontology based knowledge representation and reasoning techniques provide sophisticated knowledge about the environment for processing tasks or methods. Ontology helps in representing the knowledge about environment, events and actions that help in path planning and making robots more autonomous. Knowledge reasoning techniques can infer new conclusion and thus aids planning dynamically in a non-deterministic environment. In the initial sections, the representation of knowledge using ontology and the techniques for reasoning that could contribute in path planning are discussed in detail. In the following section, we also provide comparison of various planning domain modeling languages, ontology editors, planners and robot simulation tools.
    Source
    ICT express. 4(2018), no.2, S.69-74 [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405959518300985]
  12. Jimeno-Yepes, A.; Berlanga Llavori, R.; Rebholz-Schuhmann, D.: Ontology refinement for improved information retrieval (2010) 0.01
    0.014616735 = product of:
      0.043850206 = sum of:
        0.03282144 = weight(_text_:r in 4234) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03282144 = score(doc=4234,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12820137 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03872851 = queryNorm
            0.25601473 = fieldWeight in 4234, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4234)
        0.011028768 = product of:
          0.022057535 = sum of:
            0.022057535 = weight(_text_:4 in 4234) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.022057535 = score(doc=4234,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.105097495 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03872851 = queryNorm
                0.2098769 = fieldWeight in 4234, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4234)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 46(2010) no.4, S.426-435
  13. Green, R.: See-also relationships in the Dewey Decimal Classification (2011) 0.01
    0.014616735 = product of:
      0.043850206 = sum of:
        0.03282144 = weight(_text_:r in 4615) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03282144 = score(doc=4615,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12820137 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03872851 = queryNorm
            0.25601473 = fieldWeight in 4615, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4615)
        0.011028768 = product of:
          0.022057535 = sum of:
            0.022057535 = weight(_text_:4 in 4615) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.022057535 = score(doc=4615,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.105097495 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03872851 = queryNorm
                0.2098769 = fieldWeight in 4615, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4615)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 38(2011) no.4, S.335-341
  14. Erbarth, M.: Wissensrepräsentation mit semantischen Netzen : Grundlagen mit einem Anwendungsbeispiel für das Multi-Channel-Publishing (2006) 0.01
    0.014291803 = product of:
      0.08575082 = sum of:
        0.08575082 = weight(_text_:john in 714) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08575082 = score(doc=714,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24518675 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.330911 = idf(docFreq=213, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03872851 = queryNorm
            0.34973675 = fieldWeight in 714, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.330911 = idf(docFreq=213, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=714)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    "Wir ertrinken in Informationen, aber uns dürstet nach Wissen." Trendforscher John Naisbitt drückt hiermit aus, dass es dem Menschen heute nicht mehr möglich ist die Informationsflut, die sich über ihn ergießt, effizient zu verwerten. Er lebt in einer globalisierten Welt mit einem vielfältigen Angebot an Medien, wie Presse, Radio, Fernsehen und dem Internet. Die Problematik der mangelnden Auswertbarkeit von großen Informationsmengen ist dabei vor allem im Internet akut. Die Quantität, Verbreitung, Aktualität und Verfügbarkeit sind die großen Vorteile des World Wide Web (WWW). Die Probleme liegen in der Qualität und Dichte der Informationen. Das Information Retrieval muss effizienter gestaltet werden, um den wirtschaftlichen und kulturellen Nutzen einer vernetzten Welt zu erhalten.Matthias Erbarth beleuchtet zunächst genau diesen Themenkomplex, um im Anschluss ein Format für elektronische Dokumente, insbesondere kommerzielle Publikationen, zu entwickeln. Dieses Anwendungsbeispiel stellt eine semantische Inhaltsbeschreibung mit Metadaten mittels XML vor, wobei durch Nutzung von Verweisen und Auswertung von Zusammenhängen insbesondere eine netzförmige Darstellung berücksichtigt wird.
  15. Green, R.: Semantic types, classes, and instantiation (2006) 0.01
    0.01383385 = product of:
      0.04150155 = sum of:
        0.028132662 = weight(_text_:r in 236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028132662 = score(doc=236,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12820137 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03872851 = queryNorm
            0.2194412 = fieldWeight in 236, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=236)
        0.013368886 = product of:
          0.026737772 = sum of:
            0.026737772 = weight(_text_:4 in 236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.026737772 = score(doc=236,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.105097495 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03872851 = queryNorm
                0.25440922 = fieldWeight in 236, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=236)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Semantic types provide a level of abstraction over particulars with shared behavior, such as in the participant structure of semantic frames. The paper presents a preliminary investigation, drawing on data from WordNet and FrameNet, into the relationship between hierarchical level and the semantic types that name frame elements (a.k.a. slots). Patterns discovered include: (1) The level of abstraction of a frame is generally matched by the level of abstraction of its frame elements. (2) The roles played by persons tend to be expressed very specifically. (3) Frame elements that mirror the name of the frame tend to be expressed specifically. (4) Some frame participants tend to be expressed at a constant (general) level of abstraction, regardless of the level of abstraction of the overall frame.
    Source
    Knowledge organization for a global learning society: Proceedings of the 9th International ISKO Conference, 4-7 July 2006, Vienna, Austria. Hrsg.: G. Budin, C. Swertz u. K. Mitgutsch
  16. Rocha Souza, R.; Lemos, D.: a comparative analysis : Knowledge organization systems for the representation of multimedia resources on the Web (2020) 0.01
    0.01383385 = product of:
      0.04150155 = sum of:
        0.028132662 = weight(_text_:r in 5993) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028132662 = score(doc=5993,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12820137 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03872851 = queryNorm
            0.2194412 = fieldWeight in 5993, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5993)
        0.013368886 = product of:
          0.026737772 = sum of:
            0.026737772 = weight(_text_:4 in 5993) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.026737772 = score(doc=5993,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.105097495 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03872851 = queryNorm
                0.25440922 = fieldWeight in 5993, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5993)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Content
    DOI:10.5771/0943-7444-2020-4-300.
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 47(2020) no.4, S.300-319
  17. Sigel, A.: Was leisten Topic Maps? (2001) 0.01
    0.012528631 = product of:
      0.03758589 = sum of:
        0.028132662 = weight(_text_:r in 5855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028132662 = score(doc=5855,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12820137 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03872851 = queryNorm
            0.2194412 = fieldWeight in 5855, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5855)
        0.00945323 = product of:
          0.01890646 = sum of:
            0.01890646 = weight(_text_:4 in 5855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.01890646 = score(doc=5855,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.105097495 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03872851 = queryNorm
                0.17989448 = fieldWeight in 5855, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5855)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Series
    Tagungen der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Informationswissenschaft und Informationspraxis; 4
    Source
    Information Research & Content Management: Orientierung, Ordnung und Organisation im Wissensmarkt; 23. DGI-Online-Tagung der DGI und 53. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Informationswissenschaft und Informationspraxis e.V. DGI, Frankfurt am Main, 8.-10.5.2001. Proceedings. Hrsg.: R. Schmidt
  18. Wei, W.; Liu, Y.-P.; Wei, L-R.: Feature-level sentiment analysis based on rules and fine-grained domain ontology (2020) 0.01
    0.012528631 = product of:
      0.03758589 = sum of:
        0.028132662 = weight(_text_:r in 5876) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028132662 = score(doc=5876,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12820137 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03872851 = queryNorm
            0.2194412 = fieldWeight in 5876, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5876)
        0.00945323 = product of:
          0.01890646 = sum of:
            0.01890646 = weight(_text_:4 in 5876) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.01890646 = score(doc=5876,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.105097495 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03872851 = queryNorm
                0.17989448 = fieldWeight in 5876, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5876)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Date
    4. 3.2020 14:17:52
  19. Davies, J.; Weeks, R.: QuizRDF: search technology for the Semantic Web (2004) 0.01
    0.011528208 = product of:
      0.034584623 = sum of:
        0.023443883 = weight(_text_:r in 4320) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023443883 = score(doc=4320,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12820137 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03872851 = queryNorm
            0.18286766 = fieldWeight in 4320, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4320)
        0.011140739 = product of:
          0.022281477 = sum of:
            0.022281477 = weight(_text_:4 in 4320) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.022281477 = score(doc=4320,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.105097495 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03872851 = queryNorm
                0.21200769 = fieldWeight in 4320, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4320)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.computer.org/portal/web/csdl/proceedings/h#4.
    Source
    Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences: Proceedings of the 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'04) - Track 4, Big Island, Hawaii, January 05-January 08, 2004
  20. Semantic digital libraries (2009) 0.01
    0.011433441 = product of:
      0.06860065 = sum of:
        0.06860065 = weight(_text_:john in 3371) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06860065 = score(doc=3371,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24518675 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.330911 = idf(docFreq=213, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03872851 = queryNorm
            0.2797894 = fieldWeight in 3371, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.330911 = idf(docFreq=213, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3371)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Content
    Inhalt: Introduction to Digital Libraries and Semantic Web: Introduction / Bill McDaniel and Sebastian Ryszard Kruk - Digital Libraries and Knowledge Organization / Dagobert Soergel - Semantic Web and Ontologies / Marcin Synak, Maciej Dabrowski and Sebastian Ryszard Kruk - Social Semantic Information Spaces / John G. Breslin A Vision of Semantic Digital Libraries: Goals of Semantic Digital Libraries / Sebastian Ryszard Kruk and Bill McDaniel - Architecture of Semantic Digital Libraries / Sebastian Ryszard Kruk, Adam Westerki and Ewelina Kruk - Long-time Preservation / Markus Reis Ontologies for Semantic Digital Libraries: Bibliographic Ontology / Maciej Dabrowski, Macin Synak and Sebastian Ryszard Kruk - Community-aware Ontologies / Slawomir Grzonkowski, Sebastian Ryszard Kruk, Adam Gzella, Jakub Demczuk and Bill McDaniel Prototypes of Semantic Digital Libraries: JeromeDL: The Social Semantic Digital Library / Sebastian Ryszard Kruk, Mariusz Cygan, Adam Gzella, Tomasz Woroniecki and Maciej Dabrowski - The BRICKS Digital Library Infrastructure / Bernhard Haslhofer and Predrag Knezevié - Semantics in Greenstone / Annika Hinze, George Buchanan, David Bainbridge and Ian Witten Building the Future - Semantic Digital Libraries in Use: Hyperbooks / Gilles Falquet, Luka Nerima and Jean-Claude Ziswiler - Semantic Digital Libraries for Archiving / Bill McDaniel - Evaluation of Semantic and Social Technologies for Digital Libraries / Sebastian Ryszard Kruk, Ewelina Kruk and Katarzyna Stankiewicz - Conclusions: The Future of Semantic Digital Libraries / Sebastian Ryszard Kruk and Bill McDaniel

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 172
  • d 38

Types

  • a 147
  • el 47
  • m 22
  • x 11
  • s 10
  • r 9
  • n 2
  • p 2
  • More… Less…

Subjects

Classifications